DOCSLIB.ORG

X 6 in Re Optimal U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
X 6 in Re Optimal U.S CONFIDENTIAL 1 1 ** CONFIDENTIAL ** 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 4 5 -----------------------X 6 IN RE OPTIMAL U.S. : CASE NO.: 10-cv-4095(SAS) 7 LITIGATION : 8 -----------------------X 9 10 11 12 13 14 DEPOSITION OF BERNARD L. MADOFF 15 (Taken by the Plaintiffs) 16 Butner, North Carolina 17 August 7, 2012 18 7:51 a.m. 19 20 21 22 23 24 Reported by: Lisa A. DeGroat, RPR Notary Public 25 VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY (212) 279-9424 www.veritext.com (212) 490-3430 CONFIDENTIAL 2 4 1 A P P E A R A N C E S 1 S T I P U L A T I O N S 2 Before testimony was taken, it was stipulated 2 For the Plaintiffs: by and between counsel representing the respective 3 JAVIER BLEICHMAR, Esq. 3 parties as follows: ALAN I. ELLMAN, Esq. 4 1. That any defect in the notice of the taking of this deposition, either as to time or 4 Labaton Sucharow, L.L.P. 5 place, or otherwise as required by statute is 140 Broadway expressly waived, and this deposition shall have the 6 same effect as if formal notice in all respects as 5 New York, New York 10005 required by statute had been given and served upon (212) 907-0887 7 the counsel in the manner prescribed by law. 6 [email protected] 8 2. That this deposition shall be taken for the purpose of discovery or for use as evidence in 7 9 the above-entitled action, or for both purposes. 8 For the Defendants: 10 3. That this deposition is deemed opened and 9 SHAWN PATRICK REGAN, Esq. all formalities and requirements with respect to the 11 opening of the same, expressly including notice of GUSTAVO J. MEMBIELA, Esq. the opening of this deposition, are hereby waived, 10 Hunton & Williams, L.L.P. 12 and this deposition shall have the same effect as if all formalities in respect to the opening of the 200 Park Avenue 13 same had been complied with in detail. 11 New York, New York 10166 14 4. That the undersigned, Lisa A. DeGroat, (212) 309-1046 Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public, 15 is duly qualified and constituted to take this 12 [email protected] deposition. 13 16 5. Objections to questions, except as to the 14 17 form thereof, and motions to strike answers need not 15 be made during the taking of this deposition, but 16 18 before any judge or any court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of ruling thereon, or 17 19 at any other hearing or trial of said case at which 18 DEPOSITION OF BERNARD L. MADOFF, taken by said deposition might be used, except that an 19 the Plaintiffs, at the Federal Correctional 20 objection as to the form of a question must be made at the time such a question is asked or objection is 20 Institution - Butner Medium I, Old N.C. Highway 75, 21 waived as to the form of the question. 21 Butner, North Carolina, on the 7th day of August, 22 6. That the signature of the witness to the deposition is hereby reserved. 22 2012, at 7:51 a.m., before Lisa A. DeGroat, 23 23 Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public 7. That the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 24 of the State of North Carolina. 24 shall control concerning the use of the deposition in court. 25 25 3 5 1 C O N T E N T S 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 2 Whereupon, 3 The Witness: Bernard L. Madoff Examination 3 BERNARD L. MADOFF, 4 By Mr. Bleichmar . 5 4 having been duly sworn, 5 5 was examined and testified as follows: 6 6 DIRECT EXAMINATION BY COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 7 I N D E X O F T H E E X H I B I T 7 BY MR. BLEICHMAR: 8 8 Q. All right. Good morning, Mr. Madoff. 9 Plaintiffs' Identified Marked 9 Could you, please, state your name for the 10 Exhibit 1 Picture of the board of directors 10 record? of Banco Santander, 1 pg. 166 166 11 A. Bernard Madoff. 11 12 MR. BLEICHMAR: And, because there's been 12 13 no introductions by the usual videographer, I 13 14 will lay out on the record, my name is Javier 14 15 Bleichmar. With me is Alan Ellman, from Labaton 15 16 Sucharow. 16 17 We represent the plaintiffs in the -- in 17 18 18 re: Optimal Securities litigation in the United 19 19 States Federal District Court, in the Southern 20 20 District of Manhattan. 21 21 And, Mr. Regan, if you'd like to 22 22 introduce -- 23 23 MR. REGAN: Sure. 24 24 MR. BLEICHMAR: -- counsel for the 25 25 defendants. 2 (Pages 2 to 5) VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY (212) 279-9424 www.veritext.com (212) 490-3430 CONFIDENTIAL 6 8 1 MR. REGAN: Shawn Regan, Hunton & Williams. 1 object to my questions. They're preserving their 2 We represent the defendants in this lawsuit. 2 objections. You may still answer the questions, but 3 With me is Gus Membiela, also from Hunton & 3 we need to provide defense counsel an opportunity to 4 Williams. Gus is in our Miami office. I'm in 4 object. 5 our New York office. And I think that's it. 5 One last thing. You're not represented by 6 Before we go any further, I should just 6 counsel here; correct? 7 say, we want to designate the transcript as 7 A. No. 8 confidential, subject to review. Designated as 8 Q. And you understand that I am not your 9 confidential in its entirety at this point, 9 counsel; correct? 10 subject to further review. 10 A. Correct. 11 MR. BLEICHMAR: Right. I mean, we 11 Q. Let me ask you first a few background 12 obviously object to the designation, but the 12 questions about your -- your business. 13 procedures are set -- 13 A. Uh-huh. 14 MR. REGAN: Right. 14 Q. Your former business was called Bernard L. 15 MR. BLEICHMAR: -- in the protective order. 15 Madoff Investment Securities; correct? 16 MR. REGAN: Right. 16 A. That's right. 17 BY MR. BLEICHMAR: 17 Q. And can you describe generally what -- and, 18 Q. Mr. Madoff, have you been deposed before? 18 actually, let me step back. 19 A. Yes. 19 Can we refer to that as BMIS for short? 20 Q. And when were you deposed approximately? 20 A. Yeah. 21 A. Oh, years ago. 21 Q. And can you describe briefly what BMIS did? 22 Q. Were you deposed as a -- as a party to a 22 A. Well, we originally started out as a 23 lawsuit or -- 23 market making firm and a proprietary trading 24 A. No. As a witness. 24 firm in 1960. And there was a small division 25 Q. You were a third-party witness? 25 that was a money management firm that was headed 7 9 1 A. Expert witness. Right. 1 up by myself, my sons and my brother, ran the 2 Q. An expert witness? 2 market making and proprietary side of the 3 A. Yeah. 3 business. 4 Q. And was this a civil litigation? 4 We then became a registered investment 5 A. Yes. 5 advisor in 2006, and that business was basically 6 Q. And what capacity of expert witness were 6 separate from the market making proprietary 7 you? 7 business. Although, it was under the same 8 A. Trader. As an expert trader. 8 heading and under the same umbrella. 9 Q. So you're a little bit familiar with -- 9 Q. When you referred to the market making 10 with the mechanics of a deposition; correct? 10 business, for purposes of the jury, that is not 11 A. Yes. 11 familiar with these trading terms, can you just 12 Q. I'm going to ask you to make sure that all 12 describe what market making entails? 13 of your responses are verbal. Otherwise, the court 13 A. Market making is basically a wholesale 14 reporter cannot transcribe them. 14 operation that is similar to a specialist 15 Also, please make sure you let me finish my 15 operation on the floor of an exchange. 16 question before you begin your answer. That way the 16 We actually were the largest competitor 17 court reporter doesn't have to step on itself. 17 of the New York Stock Exchange, and we 18 Do you understand? 18 transacted about 400,000 transactions a day. We 19 A. Yeah. 19 represented close to ten percent of all of the 20 Q. If you -- if you need a break, please, let 20 trading in U.S. equities. 21 us know. 21 What a market maker does is stand -- is 22 A. Uh-huh. 22 registered with the SEC and the NASD, now called 23 Q. We can take a break whenever it's 23 FINRA, as a market maker. He then is 24 convenient for you. 24 responsible for maintaining an orderly liquid 25 At some point in time defense counsel may 25 market in a list of securities that he registers 3 (Pages 6 to 9) VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY (212) 279-9424 www.veritext.com (212) 490-3430 CONFIDENTIAL 10 12 1 for. 1 advisors, as opposed to just a broker-dealer. 2 We traded the complete 500 S&P 2 The main reason that was was because 3 securities, as well as about 200 NASDAQ 3 investment -- once you register as an investment 4 securities as well.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone
    08-01789-smb Doc 8490 Filed 11/17/14 Entered 11/17/14 18:57:21 Main Document Pg 1 of 4 Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 David J. Sheehan Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC and the Estate of Bernard L. Madoff UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (SMB) Plaintiff, SIPA LIQUIDATION v. (Substantively Consolidated) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, Adv. Pro. No. ________ (SMB) Plaintiff, v. DECLARATION OF KEITH R. MURPHY IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR A & G GOLDMAN PARTNERSHIP and PAMELA ENFORCEMENT OF THE GOLDMAN, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND AUTOMATIC STAY Defendants. 08-01789-smb Doc 8490 Filed 11/17/14 Entered 11/17/14 18:57:21 Main Document Pg 2 of 4 KEITH R. MURPHY, under penalty of perjury, declares: 1. I am a member of the Bar of this Court and a partner at the firm of Baker & Hostetler LLP, counsel for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the substantively consolidated liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) under the Securities Investor Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78aaa, et seq. (“SIPA”), and the estate of Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”), individually. 2. As an attorney of record in these proceedings, I am fully familiar with the facts set forth herein.
    [Show full text]
  • 589-4201 Irving H
    Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: May 12, 2011 45 Rockefeller Plaza Hearing Time: 10:00 A.M. EST New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Objection Deadline: May 5, 2011 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Time: 4:00 P.M. EST Irving H. Picard Email: [email protected] David J. Sheehan Email: [email protected] Seanna R. Brown Email: [email protected] Jacqlyn R. Rovine Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC And Bernard L. Madoff UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) Plaintiff, SIPA Liquidation v. (Substantively Consolidated) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. SIXTH APPLICATION OF TRUSTEE AND BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP FOR ALLOWANCE OF INTERIM COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ACTUAL AND NECESSARY EXPENSES INCURRED FROM OCTOBER 1, 2010 THROUGH JANUARY 31, 2011 300147484 TO THE HONORABLE BURTON R. LIFLAND, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: Baker & Hostetler LLP (“B&H”), as counsel to Irving H. Picard, Esq., as trustee (the “Trustee”) for the substantively consolidated liquidation proceeding of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (“BLMIS”) under the Securities Investor Protection Act (“SIPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq.,1 and Bernard L. Madoff (“Madoff”), individually (collectively, “Debtor”), respectfully submits this sixth application
    [Show full text]
  • Olo.Blmis.Timelineembedvertical2.8 Copy
    BLMIS LIQUIDATION TIMELINE 2008 2008 2008 2008 DEC 11 DEC 11 DEC 15 DEC 20 Bernard Madoff is arrested by The SEC files a complaint in the The U.S. District Court for the Less than one month after the the FBI and criminally charged District Court against defen- Southern District of New York discovery of the BLMIS fraud, with a multi-billion-dollar dants Madoff and Bernard L. appoints Irving H. Picard as SIPA the SIPA Trustee and his securities fraud scheme. Madoff Investment Securities Trustee for the liquidation of the counsel announce the recovery LLC (“BLMIS”) alleging that the Bernard L. Madoff Investment of $29 million from the Bank of defendants engaged in fraud Securities brokerage firm and New York, the first of the funds through investment advisor appoints Baker & Hostetler LLP stolen through the Ponzi scheme activities. as counsel to Mr. Picard. that are recovered. 2009 2009 2009 2009 JAN 2 JAN 2 APR 28 MAY 18 More than 8,000 claims forms The Trustee publishes notices in Castor Pollux Securities wins The SIPA Trustee files a lawsuit are mailed to victims of the major newspapers to victims the Court-approved auction of seeking the return of $3.2 billion fraud, with instructions for filing and creditors regarding the the BLMIS market-making from Fairfield Greenwich Group, by initial deadlines of March 4, liquidation of BLMIS. business assets for $1 million at one of the largest alleged 2009 and July 2, 2009; claims closing and up to $24.5 million in “feeder funds.” forms are also available for deferred compensation through download from the Internet.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Madoff A
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship 12-31-2009 Evil Has a New Name (And a New Narrative): Bernard Madoff A. Christine Hurt BYU Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation A. Christine Hurt, ???? ??? ? ??? ???? (??? ? ??? ?????????): ??????? ??????, 2009 Mɪᴄʜ. Sᴛ. L. Rᴇᴠ. 947. This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVIL HAS A NEW NAME (AND A NEW NARRATIVE): BERNARD MADOFF Christine Hurt* 2009 MICH. ST. L. REV. 947 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................. ....... 947 I. MADOFF'S EXTRAORDINARY CRIME.........................951 A. The Rise and Fall of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities..951 B. Madoff's Scheme as Affinity Fraud ..................... 957 II. VICTIMS SHAPE THE MADOFF NARRATIVE ....................... 959 A. Victim Impact Statements ................... ......... 961 B. Sentencing "Extraordinary Evil " ............. ........... 965 C. Restitution, Remission, and Compensation ......... ...... 968 1. Restitution ....................................... 968 2. SIPC Compensation ............................ 969 3. Tax Relief ................ .................
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Madoff Scandal Paradigmatic?
    IS THE MADOFF SCANDAL PARADIGMATIC? Too Good to Be True Erin V. Arvedlund New York, NY: Portfolio/Penguin, 2009 Betrayal Andrew Kirtzman New York, NY: Harper, 2009 No One Would Listen Harry Markopolos New York: Wiley, 2010 Madoff With The Money Jerry Oppenheimer New York: Wiley 2009 The Madoff Chronicles Brian Ross New York, NY: Hyperion, 2009 Catastrophe Deborah and Gerald Strober Beverly Hills, CA: Phoenix Books, 2009 Madoff’s Other Secret Sheryl Weinstein New York, NY: St Martin’s Press, 2009 Reviewed by John Graham and Kevin MacDonald Initially Bernard Madoff’s record-breaking $65 billion Ponzi scheme was reported in terms of how much harm he had done fellow Jews. Subsequently discussion focused on the ineptitude of the Securi- ties and Exchange Commission in not detecting and shutting down this fraud much earlier. 4 The Occidental Quarterly, vol. 10, no. 2, Summer 2010 We contend here that the now extensive literature reveals that the Madoff phenomenon was in fact a massive shift of resources from non-Jews to Jews. Prime beneficiaries extended beyond the Madoff family to a number of other members of the Jewish elite. The scam uti- lized familiar Jewish social traits to reach the size it did. Far from be- ing protected by SEC ineptitude, it was Madoff’s perceived position as part of the Jewish Establishment that put him beyond the law — by intimidating the SEC. This was accentuated by traditional Jewish in- hibitions on reporting Jewish criminality. We suggest that Madoff’s self-destructive as well as socially damaging behavior stemmed ulti- mately from the conditionality inherent in the Jewish attitude to socie- ty at large — and is not unique to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Madoff
    Brigham Young University Law School BYU Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship 12-31-2009 Evil Has a New Name (And a New Narrative): Bernard Madoff A. Christine Hurt BYU Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Banking and Finance Law Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation A. Christine Hurt, Evil Has a New Name (And a New Narrative): Bernard Madoff, ( ,): , 2009 Mɪᴄʜ. Sᴛ. L. Rᴇᴠ. 947. This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVIL HAS A NEW NAME (AND A NEW NARRATIVE): BERNARD MADOFF Christine Hurt* 2009 MICH. ST. L. REV. 947 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................. ....... 947 I. MADOFF'S EXTRAORDINARY CRIME.........................951 A. The Rise and Fall of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities..951 B. Madoff's Scheme as Affinity Fraud ..................... 957 II. VICTIMS SHAPE THE MADOFF NARRATIVE ....................... 959 A. Victim Impact Statements ................... ......... 961 B. Sentencing "Extraordinary Evil " ............. ........... 965 C. Restitution, Remission, and Compensation ......... ...... 968 1. Restitution ....................................... 968 2. SIPC Compensation ............................ 969 3. Tax Relief ...............
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Organization of Secrecy and Deception
    STXXXX10.1177/0735275114558631Sociological TheoryGibson 558631research-article2014 Article Sociological Theory 2014, Vol. 32(4) 283 –306 Enduring Illusions: The Social © American Sociological Association 2014 DOI: 10.1177/0735275114558631 Organization of Secrecy and stx.sagepub.com Deception David R. Gibson1 Abstract Sociologists theorize that people comply with the dictates of states and other organizations out of self-interest or because of the perceived legitimacy of those in authority. Some organizations, however, are based on lies, or secrets, and it would seem that these should be very short-lived, given how easy it is for the truth to escape. This article lays the foundations of a sociology of deception, focusing on lies and secrets successfully maintained for years or even decades. The ideas of Goffman and Simmel provide a theoretical starting point. Then Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi scheme is considered as a case study. Drawing on that and other examples, the article culminates in a theory that distinguishes between barriers to knowing, barriers to asking, barriers to telling, barriers to perceiving, barriers to believing, and barriers to acting. Together, these may counter the natural entropic tendency for information to leak and diffuse, in part because the effectiveness of one sort of barrier may offset imperfections in others. Keywords deception, secrecy, organizations, interaction Social theorists often suppose that social order rests on the perceptions of the ruled, and most often these are taken to be accurate. Weber ([1921] 1978), for instance, argued that a viable political community requires leaders who are perceived as legitimate, whether by virtue of tradition (power is exercised as it always has been), charisma (the leader possesses certain extraordinary virtues), or law (office-holders were lawfully appointed, and their powers are closely circumscribed).
    [Show full text]
  • First Interim Trustee Report.DOC
    Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Irving H. Picard Email: [email protected] David J. Sheehan Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Esq. Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC And Bernard L. Madoff UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION Adv. Pro. No. 08-1789 (BRL) CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Applicant, SIPA Liquidation v. (Substantively Consolidated) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. TRUSTEE’S FIRST INTERIM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD DECEMBER 11, 2008 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2009 300016705 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................2 III. PROCEDURAL HISTORY .................................................................................5 IV. LIQUIDATION PROCEEDING..........................................................................5 V. ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE..............................................................7 A. RETENTION OF PROFESSIONALS ............................................................7 B. MARSHALLING AND LIQUIDATION OF ESTATE ASSETS ...................8 C. WIND-DOWN OF ESTATE OPERATIONS...............................................15 VI. FINANCIAL
    [Show full text]
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New
    Baker & Hostetler LLP Hearing Date: October 19, 2011 45 Rockefeller Plaza Hearing Time: 10:00 A.M. EST New York, New York 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Objection Deadline: October 5, 2011 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Time: 4:00 P.M. EST Irving H. Picard Email: [email protected] David J. Sheehan Email: [email protected] Seanna R. Brown Email: [email protected] Jacqlyn R. Rovine Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC And Bernard L. Madoff UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) Plaintiff, SIPA Liquidation v. (Substantively Consolidated) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. SEVENTH APPLICATION OF TRUSTEE AND BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP FOR ALLOWANCE OF INTERIM COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES RENDERED AND REIMBURSEMENT OF ACTUAL AND NECESSARY EXPENSES INCURRED FROM FEBRUARY 1, 2011 THROUGH MAY 31, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ....................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 6 A. THE SIPA LIQUIDATION ................................................................................... 6 B. THE TRUSTEE, COUNSEL, AND CONSULTANTS ........................................ 8 C. PRIOR COMPENSATION
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of an Alternative Remedy for Victims of Ponzi Schemes*
    NET EQUITY ONLY COMES WITH NET EQUALITY: AN EXPLORATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE REMEDY FOR * VICTIMS OF PONZI SCHEMES I. INTRODUCTION Amid the financial catastrophe that persists in the United States today, one of the most damaging contributors unmasked is the array of fraudulent investment scams that have appeared in federal courts.1 Although some justice is seen as fraudsters such as Bernard Madoff and R. Allen Stanford sit in prison,2 such a consequence does not resolve the devastating financial loss that individuals and charitable organizations have suffered as a result of such schemes. Upon the collapse of such a criminal plot, the court often appoints a trustee3 to liquidate the conspirator’s estate and recover as much of the phony investment as possible for purposes of equitable distribution among innocent investors.4 As one theorist put it, the fantasy that the trustee will locate colossal bank accounts in the Caymans to fully compensate victims is generally replaced by the stunning actuality that “the elusive ‘pot of gold’ is in the pockets of the innocent victims who invested with the schemer.”5 Consequently, compensation often involves the “clawback” of various payments made before the scheme collapses.6 Despite a long history of such schemes, the circuit courts have been unable to settle on a consistent and proper remedy for the innocent investors; in some instances, those who innocently profit from * Alex S. Weiner, J.D. Candidate, Temple University James E. Beasley School of Law, 2012. Sincere thanks to my faculty advisor, Professor William J. Woodward, Jr., and the Editorial Board of Temple Law Review for their guidance and dedication in publishing this piece.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITALISM, KINSHIP, and FRAUD the Case of Bernie Madoff
    UCLA UCLA Previously Published Works Title CAPITALISM, KINSHIP, AND FRAUD The Case of Bernie Madoff Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1kf0t8qz Journal SOCIAL ANALYSIS, 63(3) ISSN 0155-977X Author Ortner, Sherry B Publication Date 2019-09-01 DOI 10.3167/sa.2019.630301 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California CAPITALISM, KINSHIP, AND FRAUD The Case of Bernie Madoff Sherry B. Ortner Abstract: Investment broker Bernie Madoff ran what is still considered the largest Ponzi scheme in history, defrauding thousands of investors over a 20-year period of more than $20 billion. He worked his game almost entirely through kinship connections—relatives, friends of rela- tives, and relatives of friends. The relationship between kinship and capitalism has drawn renewed attention by anthropologists, part of a broader effort to rethink capitalism not as a free-standing ‘economy’ but as deeply embedded in a wide range of social relations. In this article I use the Madoff case to illustrate, and develop further, several aspects of the kinship/capitalism connection. I also consider briefly the boundary between fraud and ‘legitimate’ capitalism, which many economic historians consider a fuzzy boundary at best. Keywords: boundaries, capitalism, feminist perspective, fraud, Jewish community, kinship, patriarchy In December 2008, in the midst of what many have called the greatest American financial crisis since the crash of the stock market in 1929, a securities broker named Bernard L. Madoff (MAY-doff) was arrested for conducting what is now considered the biggest Ponzi scheme in history. It involved the largest amount of money ever seen in such a scheme, went on longer than any other known scheme, and involved more victims over more of the globe than any scheme on record.
    [Show full text]
  • April 25, 2012 Seventh Interim Report
    08-01789-brl Doc 4793 Filed 04/25/12 Entered 04/25/12 18:26:02 Main Document Pg 1 of 73 Baker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, NY 10111 Telephone: (212) 589-4200 Facsimile: (212) 589-4201 Irving H. Picard Email: [email protected] David J. Sheehan Email: [email protected] Seanna R. Brown Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Irving H. Picard, Trustee for the Substantively Consolidated SIPA Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC And Bernard L. Madoff UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) Plaintiff-Applicant, SIPA Liquidation v. (Substantively Consolidated) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES LLC, Defendant. In re: BERNARD L. MADOFF, Debtor. TRUSTEE’S SEVENTH INTERIM REPORT FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 2012 08-01789-brl Doc 4793 Filed 04/25/12 Entered 04/25/12 18:26:02 Main Document Pg 2 of 73 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 4 III. FINANCIAL CONDITION OF ESTATE ......................................................................... 4 IV. ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE .......................................................................... 5 A. Marshaling And Liquidating The Estate Assets .................................................... 5 B. Retention Of Professionals
    [Show full text]