DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Crewe & Nantwich in Cheshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Draft recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Crewe & Nantwich in Cheshire Further electoral review November 2006 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Boundary Committee for England: Tel: 020 7271 0500 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G 2 Contents What is the Boundary Committee for England? 5 Executive summary 7 1 Introduction 15 2 Current electoral arrangements 19 3 Submissions received 23 4 Analysis and draft recommendations 25 Electorate figures 26 Council size 26 Electoral equality 27 General analysis 28 Warding arrangements 29 Acton, Audlem, Bunbury, Englesea, Haslington, Minshull, 29 Peckforton, Wrenbury and Wybunbury wards Barony Weaver, Birchin and Wellington wards 32 Alexandra, Leighton, St Barnabas, St Mary’s, Shavington, 33 Wells Green, Willaston and Wistaston Green wards Coppenhall, Delamere, Grosvenor, Maw Green, St John’s, 36 Valley and Waldron wards Conclusions 39 Parish electoral arrangements 39 5 What happens next? 43 6 Mapping 45 Appendices A Glossary and abbreviations 47 B Code of practice on written consultation 51 3 4 What is the Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. It is responsible for conducting reviews as directed by the Electoral Commission or the Secretary of State. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Robin Gray Joan Jones CBE Ann M. Kelly Professor Colin Mellors Director: Archie Gall When conducting reviews our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. 5 6 Executive summary The Boundary Committee for England is the body responsible for conducting electoral reviews of local authorities. A further electoral review of Crewe & Nantwich is being undertaken to provide improved levels of electoral equality across the borough. It aims to ensure that the number of voters represented by each borough councillor is approximately the same. The Electoral Commission directed the Boundary Committee for England to undertake this review on 12 May 2005. Current electoral arrangements Under the existing arrangements, seven of the existing 27 wards currently have more than 10% more electors than the borough average. By 2009 two wards would have more than 30% more electors than the borough average. Englesea ward would have 42% more electors and Wybunbury ward would have 75% more electors than the borough average. This review will be conducted in four stages: Stage Stage starts Description One 6 September 2005 Submission of proposals to us Two 13 December 2005 Our analysis and deliberation Three 7 November 2006 Publication of draft recommendations and consultation on them Four 13 February 2007 Analysis of submissions received and formulation of final recommendations Submissions received During Stage One we received five submissions. Crewe & Nantwich Borough Council and Crewe & Nantwich Conservative Group put forward proposals for the whole borough. Nantwich Independent Group supported the Conservative Group’s proposals. The Liberal Democrat Group supported the Borough Council’s proposals. We also received a submission from Hankelow Parish Council. Analysis and draft recommendations Electorate figures The Borough Council is predicting electorate growth of 6% over five years from 2004. This will be spread across the borough. We note the methodology used to forecast the electorate in 2009 follows the model used by Cheshire County Council Research and Intelligence Unit. We consider the estimate provided to be the best available. Council size Crewe & Nantwich Borough Council proposed an increase in council size from 56 to 57 councillors, arguing that the new political management structure and an increased 7 contribution to Local Strategic Partnerships and increased community leadership role take up a lot of the members’ time. The Conservative Group based its borough-wide scheme on a council size of 56 but did not put forward any evidence in support of its proposed council size. Therefore, on the basis of the evidence put forward by the Borough Council, we recommend adopting a council size of 57. General analysis The Borough Council proposed boundaries based on 26 wards. In the rural area of the borough we are adopting the Borough Council’s proposals without amendment. In Nantwich we also recommend adopting the Borough Council’s proposals, while also asking for views on options for improving the boundaries and access within the town, specifically in the area to the north of Hospital Street. In Crewe we are adopting the Borough Council’s proposed wards with three amendments to improve electoral equality and strengthen ward boundaries, affecting St John’s, St Mary’s, Willaston, Wistaston Green and Valley wards. We are also inviting further views on the warding of the centre of Crewe around the existing Coppenhall, Delamere and Grosvenor wards. We are recommending a mixture of single-member, two-member and three- member wards. What happens next? There will now be a consultation period, during which we encourage comments on our draft recommendations on future electoral arrangements for Crewe & Nantwich contained in this report. We welcome views from all parts of the community and believe that the more feedback we receive, based on clear evidence, the better informed we will be in forming our final recommendations. We will take into account all submissions received by 12 February 2007. Any received after this date may not be taken into account. We have not finalised our conclusions on the electoral arrangements for Crewe & Nantwich and welcome comments from interested parties. In particular, we found our decisions regarding the centre of Crewe and the boundaries within Nantwich to involve difficult judgements, considering the lack of strong evidence provided. We would particularly welcome local views, backed up by demonstrable evidence, during Stage Three. We will consider all the evidence submitted to us during the consultation period before preparing our final recommendations. Express your views by writing directly to us: Review Manager Crewe & Nantwich Review The Boundary Committee for England Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW [email protected] The full report is available to download at www.boundarycommittee.org.uk. 8 Table 1: Draft recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas councillors 1 Acton 1 Part of the existing Acton ward (the parishes of Acton, Broomhall, Burland, Edleston, Henhull, Hurleston, Sound and Stoke); part of the existing Bunbury ward (the parish of Wardle) 2 Alexandra 3 The existing Alexandra ward (unparished and Gresty Brook parish ward of Shavington cum Gresty parish) 3 Audlem 2 The existing Audlem ward (the parishes of Newhall, Dodcott cum Wilkesley, Audlem, Buerton and Hankelow); part of the existing Acton ward (the parishes of Austerson, Baddington and Coole Pilate) 4 Barony Weaver 3 The existing Barony Weaver ward (Barony and Weaver parish wards of Nantwich parish) 5 Birchin 2 Part of the existing Birchin ward (the proposed Birchin parish ward of Nantwich parish) 6 Brine Leas 3 The existing Wellington ward and part of the existing Birchin ward (the proposed Brine Leas parish ward of Nantwich parish); part of the existing Wybunbury ward (the proposed Stapeley Urban parish ward of Stapeley parish) 7 Bunbury 1 Part of the existing Bunbury ward (the parishes of Alpraham, Bunbury and Calveley) 8 Delamere 2 Part of the existing Delamere ward (unparished); part of the existing Grosvenor ward (unparished) 9 Englesea 2 Part of the existing Englesea ward (the parishes of Crewe Green, Barthomley, Weston and Basford and the existing Oakhanger parish ward of Haslington parish); part of the existing Wybunbury ward (the parishes of Blakenhall, Checkley cum Wrinehill and Chorlton) 9 Table 1 (continued): Draft recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas councillors 10 Haslington 3 The existing Haslington ward (Haslington Village and Winterley parish wards of Haslington parish) 11 Leighton 3 The existing Leighton ward (unparished and Leighton Urban parish ward of Leighton parish) 12 Maw Green 3 The existing Maw Green ward (unparished); part of the existing Delamere ward (unparished) 13 Minshull 1 The existing Minshull ward (the parishes of Wettenhall, Cholmondeston, Aston Juxta Mondrum, Worleston, Church Minshull, Minshull Vernon, Poole and Warmingham and Leighton Rural parish ward of Leighton parish) 14 Peckforton 1 The existing Peckforton ward (the parishes of Bulkeley, Bickerton, Egerton, Peckforton, Cholmondeley, Chorley, Faddiley, Ridley, Brindley, Spurstow and Haughton) 15 St Barnabas 3 Part of the existing St Barnabas ward (unparished); part of the existing Grosvenor ward (unparished) 16 St John’s 3 Part of the
Recommended publications
  • Police Report for the Parish Councils of Haslington, Crewe Green and Barthomley

    Police Report for the Parish Councils of Haslington, Crewe Green and Barthomley

    Police Report for the Parish Councils of Haslington, Crewe Green and Barthomley 1st December 2020- 31st December 2020 These councils have been grouped together due to their geographical proximity and size. The Dingle Primary School- On 4/12 there was a bomb hoax at the school. A call was made saying a bomb was on site but it was quickly ascertained by police that it was a hoax and there was no risk to the school. The offender has been identified and is currently being dealt with by PC Martin and PCSO Jolley for the specific offence of a Bomb Hoax contrary to Section 51 Criminal Law Act 1977. The offender is a juvenile who is being bullied and this has played into the incident. In addition to the offender being dealt with, the High School where the other involved parties attend and their parents will be spoken to and dealt with. An update will hopefully be available for the Parish Council around February 2021. Old Park Road, Crewe Green- Caller has reported that he has seen four suspicious males around his property and come out to find the gate has been damaged. There appears no reason for this. There is CCTV that is currently being reviewed by the attending officer to see if there are any lines of enquiry. Stephen Taylor- On 6/10 police received a report of a male in Haslington making sexual remarks to some minors. They had managed to capture him momentarily on video and he was identified by PCSO Jolley and PCSO Barlow as a registered sex offender.
  • Application No: 12/1349N Location: HUNSTERSON FISHERIES, LAND OFF BIRCHALL MOSS LANE, HUNSTERSON, NANTWICH, CHESHIRE, CW5 7PH Pr

    Application No: 12/1349N Location: HUNSTERSON FISHERIES, LAND OFF BIRCHALL MOSS LANE, HUNSTERSON, NANTWICH, CHESHIRE, CW5 7PH Pr

    Application No: 12/1349N Location: HUNSTERSON FISHERIES, LAND OFF BIRCHALL MOSS LANE, HUNSTERSON, NANTWICH, CHESHIRE, CW5 7PH Proposal: Proposed Fishermans Retreat Building Applicant: MR F STRICKLAND Expiry Date: 27-Jun-2012 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to conditions Main issues: • The principle of the development • The impact of the design • The impact upon neighbouring amenity • The impact upon protected species REASON FOR REFERRAL Councillor J. Clowes has called in this application to Southern Planning Committee for the following reasons: • ‘Inappropriate and unsustainable intensification of activity on agricultural land in the open countryside. • Inappropriate size, structure and materials of the proposed building. • Consequent visual intrusion on a green field site in the open countryside. • Hazardous entry and exit to and from the site on Bridgemere Lane. • Inadequate preparation in terms of siting and management of proposed septic tank foul drainage system. • Current informal ‘presumptive’ car parking arrangements are inadequate for the numbers of vehicles proposed in this application.’ DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND CONTEXT The application site relates to land to the south of Bridgemere Lane, Hunsterson, Nantwich within the Open Countryside. The land relates to a section of open paddock adjacent to a large fishing pond set approximately 150 metres to the south of the road. Currently on site is an unauthorised touring caravan which appears to be being used as a makeshift ‘fisherman’s hut’. DETAILS OF PROPOSAL Revised plans have been submitted for the erection of a purpose built fisherman’s hut. The proposed unit would measure approximately 6.6 metres in length, 5 metres in width and would have a pitched roof approximately 4.1 metres in height from ground floor level.
  • A500 Dualling) (Classified Road) (Side Roads) Order 2020

    A500 Dualling) (Classified Road) (Side Roads) Order 2020

    THE CHESHIRE EAST BOROUGH COUNCIL (A500 DUALLING) (CLASSIFIED ROAD) (SIDE ROADS) ORDER 2020 AND THE CHESHIRE EAST BOROUGH COUNCIL (A500 DUALLING) COMPULSORY PURCHASE ORDER 2020 COMBINED STATEMENT OF REASONS [Page left blank intentionally] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose of Statement ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Statutory powers ............................................................................................................... 2 2 BACKGROUND AND SCHEME DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................... 3 2.1 Regional Growth ................................................................................................................ 3 2.2 Local Context ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Scheme History .................................................................................................................. 5 3 EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 6 3.1 Local Network Description ................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Travel Patterns ...............................................................................................................
  • Audlem Doddington Wybunbury Parish Profile

    Audlem Doddington Wybunbury Parish Profile

    THE BENEFICE OF AUDLEM, DODDINGTON AND WYBUNBURY. The benefice was created in February 2010. Prior to that Doddington and Wybunbury were linked but Audlem was a single parish church. On the retirement of the incumbent at Wybunbury and Doddington, the benefice was created with the in situ incumbent for Audlem being appointed Vicar to the 3 churches. Since this time, the churches have retained their own identities, services and PCC’s but also work well together. People do support events at each of the churches. 2 Lay Readers work across all 3 churches, one retired priest supports services in Audlem, the other is at Doddington most weeks with occasional services in Wybunbury. It is located near to main line train services in Crewe, close to junction 16 of the M6. What we offer to our new incumbent • welcoming and supportive congregations and communities ● our prayerful support and encouragement ● our respect for your home life, your prayer life and encouragement and support to take holidays and regular time off each week ● the support of 2 retired Priests on a regular basis, 2 Lay Readers, strong PCC’s and experienced Church Wardens. Also many volunteers are willing to lead intercessions or read in church and a group take part in ‘open the book’ school worship. ● excellent and close links with 4 caring and effective C of E primary schools ● a church band at Wybunbury that enhances worship in a modern designed church. A singing group and musicians group at Audlem. Organists in each church. ● a large 4-bedroom modern purpose-built vicarage with good size garden adjacent to St.
  • August 2019 Item 4 – Pre-Regulation 14 Draft

    August 2019 Item 4 – Pre-Regulation 14 Draft

    Hankelow Neighbourhood Plan. 2019-2030 RegulationItem 4 – Pre 14-regulation Draft – August 14 draft 201 9 Pre-reg 14 draft Page 1 of 59 Contents 1. Introduction to Neighbourhood Planning. ........................................................................... 4 2. The Planning Process. .......................................................................................................... 5 3. The Neighbourhood Plan Area of Hankelow. ....................................................................... 6 4. History of Hankelow. ........................................................................................................... 7 5. Hankelow today. ................................................................................................................. 7 5.1. Character ........................................................................................................................... 7 5.2. Architectural Heritage ........................................................................................................ 8 5.3. Natural environment and landscape. .................................................................................. 9 5.4. Population. ...................................................................................................................... 10 6. Consultation ...................................................................................................................... 11 7. Vision and Objectives for Hankelow..................................................................................
  • Wrightmarshall.Co.Uk

    Wrightmarshall.Co.Uk

    ‘THE FIRS FARMHOUSE BARN’ | WOORE ROAD | BUERTON | CHESHIRE | CW3 0DD | GUIDE PRICE £250,000 COUNTRY HOMES │ COTTAGES │ UNIQUE PROPERTIES │ CONVERSIONS │ PERIOD PROPERTIES │ LUXURY APARTMENTS wrightmarshall.co.uk ‘The Firs Farmhouse Barn’, Woore Road, Buerton, Cheshire, CW3 0DD A superb opportunity to acquire a period detached barn requiring conversion standing in a wonderful rural location with views over adjoining farmland. With the benefit of planning permission for the conversion to one dwelling (Ref: 17/3939N). The existing barn is positioned end on to the road itself, and boasts wonderful views to the side & rear. Access presently is shared with the adjoining property, 'The Firs Farmhouse', however provision has been made within the planning permission, for a separate entrance to be created in due course for the sole use of the farmhouse, therefore the barn will have its own access leading to the parking, proposed garage etc. NO CHAIN NEARBY AUDLEM VILLAGE DIRECTIONS In a county considered as prosperous as Cheshire, a village as well Take the A529 Audlem Road out of Nantwich and continue for serviced as Audlem may become complacent about the services & approximately 7 miles into Audlem village. Upon reaching the village facilities it provides but it has demonstrated that it certainly doesn't square turn left onto the A525 Woore Road, continue for take its facilities for granted. Annual events in the Village include a approximately 1.3 miles and the barn will be observed on the left hand Transport Festival, Music & Arts Festival and Open Gardens Weekend. side. Recent Awards won by Audlem Village: Regional title for North (AUDLEM 1.5 miles : NANTWICH 7 miles : NEWCASTLE UNDER England as well as overall award for Building Community Life LYME 12 miles : CREWE MAINLINE RAILWAY STATION 10 miles : (sponsored by DEFRA-Department for Environment, Food & Rural M6 JUNCTION 16, 12 miles) Affairs) in the 2005 Calor Village of the Year.
  • Gresty Lane, Crewe

    Gresty Lane, Crewe

    Mr Stephen Bell Our Ref: APP/R0660/A/13/2209335 GVA Your Ref: Norfolk House 7 Norfolk Street Manchester 19 January 2015 M2 1DW Dear Sir, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY HIMOR GROUP LIMITED LAND BOUNDED BY GRESTY LANE, ROPE LANE, CREWE ROAD AND A500, CREWE - APPLICATION REF: 13/2874N 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, Geoffrey Hill BSc DipTP MRTPI, who held a public local inquiry between 22 July and 27 August 2014 into your clients’ appeal against the failure of Cheshire East Council (“the Council”) to give notice within the prescribed period of a decision on an application for outline permission for residential development, retirement/care village, local centre, community building, primary school, public open space, allotments, structural landscaping, access arrangements and demolition of existing structures in accordance with application ref: 13/2874N, dated 12 July 2013. 2. The appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State’s determination on 17 December 2013, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 because it involves a proposal for residential development of over 150 units which would significantly impact on the Government’s objective to secure a better balance between housing demand and supply and create high quality, sustainable, mixed and inclusive communities. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommended that the appeal be dismissed, and planning permission refused. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s recommendation.
  • Application No: 10/4485N Location: WHITTAKERS GREEN FARM, PEWIT LANE, BRIDGEMERE, CW5 7PP Proposal

    Application No: 10/4485N Location: WHITTAKERS GREEN FARM, PEWIT LANE, BRIDGEMERE, CW5 7PP Proposal

    Application No: 10/4485N Location: WHITTAKERS GREEN FARM, PEWIT LANE, BRIDGEMERE, CW5 7PP Proposal: Application for Removal or Variation of a Condition following Grant of Planning Permission: 7/09/CCC/0001 Applicant: Mr Rushton Expiry Date: 14-Jan-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION: Partial approval, amended condition. MAIN ISSUES: Impact of HGV movements on residential amenity and conflict with school drop off and pick up times. Use of the site to receive green waste from Household waste and recycling centres on Bank Holidays. REASON FOR REPORT AND NATURE OF APPLICATION Due to the site area, this application is considered to be a major waste application and should therefore be determined by the Strategic Planning Board in accordance with the established terms of reference. DESCRIPTION OF SITE The application site is an existing green waste composting facility, located within the open countryside, approximately 8.5 miles south east of Nantwich and a kilometre south of Hunsterson. The surrounding countryside is slightly undulating, divided into medium sized fields utilised for arable production. There are a number of isolated properties and farm units widely spaced surrounding the compost site. The nearest residential property, Fox Moss, is 230 metres to the north east of the site, with Pewit House a further 200 metres away to the north east. The Uplands lies 440 metres and Whittakers Green Farm is located 470 metres to the north of the application site. Woodend is 350 metres to the east of the site, and Woodfall Hall Farm is 670 metres to the south west. The site has a weighbridge and small office and on-site facility building at its entrance.
  • Minutes 2.2.21 Draft 2Pdf

    Minutes 2.2.21 Draft 2Pdf

    PECKFORTON PARISH MINUTES OF MEETING TUESDAY 2nd FEBRUARY 2021 AT 7PM PRESENT Action Penny Shearer (Chairman) Laura Maddocks (Joint Vice-Chairman) Richard Edwards (Joint Vice-Chairman) Debbie Sargent (Clerk) Stan Davies (Ward Councillor) Hilary & Mike Watson; Alan Cooch: Neil & Leslie Dyer; Dan Pendlebury; Carol and Phil Maddocks; Stuart Naylor; Laurence Woodhouse; Beki Cooch; Jo Bigland; Andrew Scorer (part), Mandy Salmon; John & Amanda Doyle 1.0 APOLOGIES Apologies were received from Nick & Jean Fairclough and Pat Holmes- Henderson 2.0 MINUTES The Chairman read out an amendment to section 5.4.2 of the previous minutes as it was felt it misrepresented what was said. The minutes were then proposed as being accurate by Stuart and seconded by Dan (see attached). 3.0 FINANCIAL STATEMENT The Clerk informed the meeting that there was a healthy £1,075 in the bank. Predicted spending was for salary and expenses £250, subscription to Cheshire Community Action £20, leaving a balance by 31 March 2021 of £805. 4.0 HIGHWAYS ISSUES The Chairman stated that the main issues were, speeding, pot holes, flooding and Parking and these had all been drawn to the attention of Highways, but that due to Covid Highways were not able to attend to repairs. Residents ALL should continue to report issues to the Council. These were also highlighted in a recent independent study carried out by Peckforton resident. On speeding - one resident questioned the Ward Councillor as to why the parish was not able to establish a 30mph limit when many other villages in the ALL area had. It was suggested that residents write in to Highways to demand that something is done in the village.
  • CVD: Primary Care Intelligence Packs: NHS South

    CVD: Primary Care Intelligence Packs: NHS South

    CVD: Primary Care Intelligence Packs NHS South Cheshire CCG June 2017 Version 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. CVD prevention • The narrative 11 • The data 13 3. Hypertension • The narrative 16 • The data 17 4. Stroke • The narrative 27 • The data 28 5. Diabetes • The narrative 42 • The data 43 6. Kidney • The narrative 53 • The data 54 7. Heart • The narrative 65 • The data 66 8. Outcomes 82 9. Appendix 88 This document is valid only when viewed via the internet. If it is printed into hard copy or saved to another location, you must first check that the version number on your copy matches that of the one online. Printed copies are uncontrolled copies. 2 CVD: Primary Care Intelligence Packs Introduction 3 CVD: Primary Care Intelligence Packs This intelligence pack has been compiled by GPs and nurses and pharmacists in the Primary Care CVD Leadership Forum in collaboration with the National Cardiovascular Intelligence Network Matt Kearney Sarit Ghosh Kathryn Griffith George Kassianos Jo Whitmore Matthew Fay Chris Harris Jan Procter-King Yassir Javaid Ivan Benett Ruth Chambers Ahmet Fuat Mike Kirby Peter Green Kamlesh Khunti Helen Williams Quincy Chuhka Sheila McCorkindale Nigel Rowell Ali Morgan Stephen Kirk Sally Christie Clare Hawley Paul Wright Bruce Taylor Mike Knapton John Robson Richard Mendelsohn Chris Arden David Fitzmaurice 4 CVD: Primary Care Intelligence Packs Local intelligence as a tool for clinicians and commissioners to improve outcomes for our patients Why should we use this CVD Intelligence Pack The high risk conditions for cardiovascular disease (CVD) - such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, high cholesterol, diabetes, non-diabetic hyperglycaemia and chronic kidney disease - are the low hanging fruit for prevention in the NHS because in each case late diagnosis and suboptimal treatment is common and there is substantial variation.
  • South Cheshire Way A4

    South Cheshire Way A4

    CONTENTS The Mid-Cheshire Footpath Society Page Waymarked Walks in Central Cheshire About the South Cheshire Way 3 Using this guide (including online map links) 6 Points of interest 9 Congleton Sandbach Mow Walking eastwards 15 Cop Grindley Brook to Marbury Big Mere 17 Scholar Green Biddulph Marbury Big Mere to Aston Village 21 Crewe Aston Village to River Weaver 24 River Weaver to A51 by Lea Forge 26 Nantwich Kidsgrove A51 by Lea Forge to Weston Church 29 Weston Church to Haslington Hall 33 Haslington Hall to Thurlwood 37 Thurlwood to Little Moreton Hall (A34) 41 Little Moreton Hall (A34) to Mow Cop 43 Stoke on Trent Grindley Brook Audlem Walking westwards 45 Mow Cop to Little Moreton Hall (A34) 47 Whitchurch Little Moreton Hall (A34) to Thurlwood 49 Thurlwood to Haslington Hall 51 Haslington Hall to Weston Church 55 Weston Church to A51 by Lea Forge 59 A51 by Lea Forge to River Weaver 63 River Weaver to Aston Village 66 THE SOUTH CHESHIRE WAY Aston Village to Marbury Big Mere 69 Marbury Big Mere to Grindley Brook 73 From Grindley Brook to Mow Cop Update information (Please read before walking) 77 About The Mid-Cheshire Footpath Society 78 A 55km (34 mile) walk in the Cheshire countryside. South Cheshire Way Page 2 of 78 Links with other footpaths ABOUT THE SOUTH CHESHIRE WAY There are excellent links with other long distance footpaths at either end. At Grindley Brook there are links with the 'Shropshire Way', the 'Bishop Bennet Bridleway', the 'Sandstone Trail', the 'Maelor Way' and the (now The South Cheshire Way was originally conceived as a route in the late unsupported) 'Marches Way'.
  • Cheshire East Care Services Directory 2015

    Cheshire East Care Services Directory 2015

    Cheshire East Care Services Directory 2015 Tatton Hall The comprehensive guide to choosing and paying for your care • Home support • Housing options • Care helpline • Care homes Cheshire East Council In association with www.carechoices.co.uk Publications The Home Care Specialists Do you need a Helping Hand? “We are incredibly fortunate to have such dedicated Live-in Care... an alternative people, like the staff at Helping Hands, caring for the vulnerable and the to residential care. elderly members of the communities.” At Helping Hands we have been providing award winning Lisa Carr, Director of The quality home care since 1989. Still family run, we apply our Great British Care Awards local knowledge and 25 years of home care experience to offer ds 25th A an nn H iv one to one care that enables you or your loved one to remain g e n r i s p a l r e y at home with compassion and dignity. H Our locally based Carers are able to balance independent 25Years living with bespoke care needs by assisting with housekeeping, companionship, providing a break for an existing care giver, personal care, support with continence and hospital discharge. So if you are looking for an alternative to residential care or extra support for those everyday tasks that are becoming a little more difficult, then we’re here to help - 24 hours per day, 7 days per week. To find out how we can help you, call: 01270 861 745 or visit: www.helpinghands.co.uk Contents Introduction from Cheshire East Council 4 Paying for care 19 Healthy lifestyles 5 Protecting adults from harm