DOCSLIB.ORG

Professionalism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Professionalism Masters of the CourtroomSM Professionalism The Hon. Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, USDC - EDLA Pauline F. Hardin, Jones Walker LLP Roma Kent, Federal Public Defender - EDLA Course Number: 0200131212 1 Hour of Professionalism CLE December 12, 2013 4 pm – 5 pm Helen "Ginger" Berrigan is a United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Louisiana and a New York native. She was appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton in March of 1994. She served as Chief Judge of the Eastern District from 2001 until 2008. Prior to her appointment as a federal judge, she was a criminal defense attorney for sixteen years. She was also a staff attorney to the Governor's Pardon, Parole and Rehabilitation Commission, and Press Secretary to Mississippi civil rights leader, Charles Evers. Prior to coming South, she served as a Legislative Aide to Senator Joseph Biden and as a free-lance staff reporter to many regional publications. Judge Berrigan is the author of Louisiana Criminal Trial Practice, 2nd and 3rd Editions. In addition to her experience as a journalist and lawyer, she has served on the boards or as a member of several legal organizations, including as President of the Louisiana American Civil Liberties Union, President of the Criminal Law Section of the Louisiana State Bar Association and as a member of the Louisiana Association for Criminal Defense Lawyers, New Orleans Association for Women Attorneys, the Louisiana Sentencing Commission, and the Federal Bar Association. She is an Adjunct Professor at LSU & Loyola Schools of Law. She is regular speaker at Continuing Legal Education programs sponsored by area law schools, bar associations and other professional organizations. Among her awards are the Louisiana State Bar Association’s Pro Bono Publico Award; the Special Achievement Award from the Louisiana Council for Equal Rights; the Louisiana Capital Defense Project Special Achievement Award; the Justice Albert Tate, Jr. Award from the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; the YWCA Role Model Award and the _Elaine R. Fisher Award_ presented by the Federal Bar Association for exemplary community, public & charitable service. In recent years, Judge Berrigan has participated in numerous international “rule of law” programs, sponsored by the State Department, in the area of criminal and human rights law. She has made multiple trips to Pakistan, Azerbaijan,and Bangladesh, as well as single trips to Malawi, and the Republic of Georgia, training judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers. She also has taken part in a death penalty program in China and lectured at several laws schools in Beijing. Judge Berrigan received her Juris Doctor in 1977 from Louisiana State University Law School, an M.A. in Communication from American University in Washington, D.C. and her undergraduate degree from University of Wisconsin. Pauline Hardin is a partner at Jones Walker LLP. in the firm's Business & Commercial Litigation Practice Group, litigating criminal and commercial issues. She has served as the head of the Business & Commercial Litigation Practice Group at Jones Walker. She frequently represents individuals and entities in complex litigation involving parallel civil, regulatory and criminal issues. Ms. Hardin previously worked for the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Louisiana and served as both First Assistant United States Attorney and Chief of the Criminal Division. Prior to that time, she served as an Assistant District Attorney in charge of the Orleans Parish Fraud Unit. A fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers since 1994, she has served on its Federal Criminal Procedure Committee. Roma Kent is a 1982 graduate of Loyola Law School. She has been an Assistant Federal Public Defender since July 1987. She was with the staff attorney’s office of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals from September 1984 to September 1986 and with the central staff of the Louisiana Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal from September 1982 to September 1984. Roma retired from the New Orleans Police Department as a lieutenant-platoon commander in the 5th District (upper and lower 9th Ward). She is also a graduate of Louisiana State University and the Academy of the Sacred Heart. Professionalism Panel "Lawyers in Wonderland" Judge Helen G. Berrigan Roma Kent Pauline F. Hardin You have a bench trial coming up in a maritime case. Several disputed issues of law are involved and have been briefed, but no ruling has been issued. You learn that the trial judge, who is not well-versed in maritime law, recently went on an all-day fishing trip with a maritime law professor from a local law school. You are familiar with this professor's views on maritime law and they are contrary to your arguments on the issues in this particular case. You are concerned that the judge may have discussed the case with the professor on the fishing trip. What do you do? What should the judge do, if anything? Assume the above, but add that the trial judge advises all the parties to the case that there was a discussion with the professor about "the law" that relates to the case, but that they should be assured the judge will draw independent conclusions. What do you do? What should the judge do, if anything more? Assume the above, but instead of a law professor, you learn the judge has gone on the fishing trip with another judge from the same court who is experienced in maritime law and likewise holds views adverse to the positions you are taking in the case. What do you do? You are a prosecutor in a capital case. The defendant is indigent and has appointed counsel. The defense files a motion for an ex parte hearing to request funding for various unnamed experts. The defense argues the prosecution shouldn't be privy to the defendant's requests because it would reveal trial strategy and because the prosecutor isn't required to reveal to the defendant expert assistance it seeks. What should the prosecutor do, if anything? What should the judge do? In the same case, the judge contacts the prosecutor to inquire whether the prosecutor is retaining a jury selection consultant and if so, how much that consultant is costing. The judge likewise wants to know how much the prosecutor's psychological expert is being paid. The judge explains that he wants a "level playing field." You surmise that the defense has requested fees for such consultants. What do you tell the judge? Is the judge's communication appropriate? You have had several run-ins in past cases with the judge's law clerk who, it seems to you, has an imperial attitude. You have had words with this particular clerk, who has been with the judge a long time. You are concerned that this clerk is influencing the judge's attitude towards you. You have an important motion coming up and very much want to have oral argument, both because you feel it would be helpful but also because you want to address the judge directly about the issues, and not through the law clerk. What do you do? You are in trial. The judge has handled the voir dire, and told the jury the various components of a trial. It is now time for the opening statement. You begin by telling the jury that an opening statement is like a road map - but the trial judge interrupts you and says, "I have already told them what an opening statement is. Move on to what you think the evidence will show." Is the judge acting appropriately? What do you do? During the direct examination of a witness, the trial judge repeatedly interrupted the lawyer to ask a question or clarify a question or answer. None of the judge's questions or clarifications were prejudicial, but the interruptions are disrupting the attorney's concentration and rattling the witness. What should the lawyer do? A witness is testifying before the jury directly contrary to a deposition previously given. Counsel asks for a sidebar and so advises the judge, showing the judge the deposition. The lawyer wants the judge to warn the witness of the dangers of committing perjury. Assuming the judge agrees there is a direct and material conflict in the testimony, what should the judge do? A lawyer filed a motion and memorandum in support of the motion, raising several issues. When the ruling comes out, the decision is adverse. However, the lawyer's main legal points were not addressed and some of the facts set forth as established and used to justify the judge's decision were in fact disputed. Other facts, contrary to the judge's ruling, were ignored. The lawyer wants to file a motion for reconsideration but the basis is simply that the judge "blew it" - missed the issues and got the facts wrong. What should the lawyer do? It's the middle of a jury trial. There are few objections and the judge is resting in his chair, eyes closed. He is not asleep but he looks bored. A couple of the jurors have apparently noticed and have smiled and elbowed each other. Both lawyers are concerned that the judge's demeanor is sending a message to the jury that the case is not important. What should they do? The bench trial occurred six months ago and the matter was taken under advisement. No ruling has issued. The lawyer has called chambers several times, politely inquiring of the law clerk when a decision might be forthcoming. She is consistently told "any day now" but still nothing happens. Her client is exasperated with her and with the justice system. Everyone needs closure. What does she do? A lawyer has an out of town case in a small community.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS City College
    College of Music.........................................................Edward J. Kvet, D.M.E., Dean Associate Dean...................................................................Anthony DeCuir, Ph.D. UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS City College................................................................Marcel Dumestre, Ed.D., Dean Associate Dean................................................................Richard A. Lucore, Ed.D. Loyola Institute for Ministry ..................................Mark Markuly, Ph.D., Director BOARD OF TRUSTEES 2003 – 2004 School of Law ..........................................................Brian Bromberger, LL.M., Dean Chair .......................................................................................Donna D. Fraiche, L’75 Associate Dean of Academic Affairs......................Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., J.D. Vice Chair.......................................................................Jerome J. Reso, Jr., B’58, L’61 Associate Dean of Students.........................Stephanie W. Jumonville, M.Ed., J.D. President ...................................................................Rev. Bernard P. Knoth, S.J., Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Admissions................................K. Michele Allison-Davis, J.D. Secretary and Treasurer......................................Rev. Lawrence W. Moore, S.J., LL.M. University Library.....................................Mary Lee Sweat, M.S.L.S., M.B.A., Dean Admissions and Enrollment Management.....................Deborah Stieffel, M.S., Dean B.A. “Red” Adams,
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint of Judicial Misconduct
    Complaint of Judicial Misconduct Complainant arl Bernofsky The Hon. Ginger Berrigan. Ju 6478 General Diaz treet United tates District Court for the New Orleans LA 70124 Eastern District of Louisiana (504) 486-46"9 (504) 589-7515 I. Introduction The complainant was plaintiff in a serie of four lawsuits against Tulane Universit in which th Hon. Ginger Berrigan was Pr siding Judge. Relatively recent) , he learned that Judge Berrigan has had a material and continuing relationship with the defendant. Under Canon 3 of the ode of Judicial onduct, Judge Berrigan had a duty to disclose her as ociation with Tulane before sitting in any cas in which Tulane was a defendant. From Januar , 1995 onward Judge Berrigan continuously violated this Code in all of the complainant's lawsuits where she presided and failed to make any disclo ure. II. Statement of Facts A. Professorship Federal District ourt Judge Ginger Berrigan i Adjunct Associate Professor of Law at Tulane University and taught the cours Trial Advocacy during the 1995-96 academic year [1 2]. Since then, Judge Berrigan has maintained a professional association with Tulane through her continued participation in the Law School's Judicial Externship Program [3-5] and as a substitute instructor for the course, Federal Practice & Procedure: Trials [6], taught by the 76-year-old Adjunct Professor Federal District Court Judge Charles Schwartz Jr. [7]. B. Board Membership In 1990, Judge Berrigan then an attorney was appointed to the Board of Directors of Tulane University's Amistad Research Center, a position she occupied until 1997 [8]. 13 ERRIGAN.Q9C - I - The Amistad Research Center occupies a wing of Tilton Memorial Hall on the campus of Tulane University [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of a Finding
    Judge Helen “Ginger” Berrigan Papers LLA0005 Inventory Compiled by Travis H. Williams Paul M. Hebert Law Center Archival Collections Paul M. Hebert Law Center Library Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University 2017 JUDGE BERRIGAN PAPERS LLA0005 1973-2016 PAUL M. HEBERT LAW CENTER LIBRARY CONTENTS OF INVENTORY SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL NOTE .......................................................................... 5 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ....................................................................................... 6 PROCESSING NOTE ........................................................................................................ 6 SERIES DESCRIPTIONS .................................................................................................. 7 INDEX TERMS .................................................................................................................. 8 CONTAINER LIST ............................................................................................................ 8 Use of archival materials. If you wish to examine materials in this collection, consult the container list and make note of which items you wish to see. Then inquire at the circulation desk about making an appointment to view those materials. Photocopying. Should you wish to request photocopies, please consult a staff member. Do not remove items to be photocopied. The existing order and arrangement of
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, March 20, 2020
    Friday, March 20, 2020 View on the Campaign Judge Lance M. Africk Lance M. Africk received a Bachelor of Arts and Laws degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1973, and his Jurist Doctorate degree from the University of North Carolina Law School at Chapel Hill in 1975. Following a judicial clerkship, and several years in private practice, Judge Africk served as the Chief of the Career Criminal Bureau for the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s office and the Chief of the Criminal Division for the United States Attorney’s office in New Orleans. In 1990, he was appointed a United States Magistrate Judge. On April 17, 2002, he was confirmed as a United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Judge Africk is an adjunct professor of law at Tulane University Law School and former president of the Allstate Sugar Bowl. He currently serves on the 5th Circuit Committee on Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions. Judge Africk was also a reviewing author for Moore's Federal Practice/Criminal Procedure Chapters, Third Edition. Judge Africk was appointed by Chief Justice Rehnquist to the Judicial Conference Committee on Criminal Law and he was reappointed to that committee by Chief Justice Roberts, his term ended on October 1, 2011. He was inducted into the Louisiana Justice Hall of Fame in July, 2011. Judge Jane Triche Milazzo Jane Triche Milazzo was sworn in as a United States District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana on October 12, 2011. Judge Milazzo was nominated by President Obama on March 13, 2011 and was unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate on October 11, 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-205 In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2017 In re CARL BERNOFSKY, Petitoner DR. CARL BERNOFSKY, Petitioner, v. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent. APPENDIX for Petition for Writ of Mandamus CARL BERNOFSKY 109 Southfield Road, Apt. 51H Shreveport, Louisiana 71105 (318) 869-3871 Petitioner, Pro Se TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Petition of Nov. 2, 2016, “Grounds for 1 Impeaching Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, Judge, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.” Submitted to all members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. 2. Cover letter of Nov. 2, 2016 from petitioner 61 Carl Bernofsky to Hon. Carl E. Stewart, for the petition: “Grounds for Impeaching Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, Judge, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.” Similar letters, together with the petition, were submitted to all members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. 3. Order, signed Dec. 28. 2016 by Chief Judge 63 Carl E. Stewart, “IN RE: The Complaint of Carl Bernofsky Against United States Senior District Judge Helen G. Berrigan, Eastern District of Louisiana, Under the Judicial Improvements Act of 2002.” Filed Jan. 4, 2017 as “Complaint Number: 05-17-90013.” i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT.) 4. Cover letter of Jan. 4, 2017 from Fifth 70 Circuit Deputy Clerk, Shelley E. Saltzman, to Carl Bernofsky, informing him of Judge Stewart’s dismissal of “Judicial Misconduct Complaint No. 05-17-90013.” 5. Petition to the Judicial Council of the Fifth 72 Circuit for review of Judicial Misconduct Complaint No. 05-17-90013, submitted Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Suit up for the Future High School
    2014 Suit Up for the Future High School Summer Legal Institute and Intern Program Awarding Winning Diversity Pipeline Program 2013 ABA PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM AWARD RECIPIENT Strengthening diversity in the legal profession A partnership of the Louisiana State Bar Association, Just the Beginning Foundation, and Louisiana Bar Foundation A Diversity Pipeline Program New Orleans, Louisiana 2 | P a g e Suit Up for the Future - 2014 Table of Contents ABOUT Us ………………………………………………………………………………………..…………………….3 WHO IS THE LSBA? ..............................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THE JTBF? .....................................................................................................................4 WHO IS THE LBF? .................................................................................................................................5 2014 LEGAL SCHOLARS……………………………………………………………………………………..…….........6 WEEK ONE .....................................................................................................................................................7-8 Law School Summer School: Louisiana State Bar Center WEEK TWO....................................................................................................................................................9 Oral Argument Preparation: Field Placement Days WEEK THREE ............................................................................................................................................10-12
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Helen Ginger Berrigan Chief U.S. District Judge, Eastern District of Louisiana
    Published September 2005 Judicial Profile APRIL WATSON Hon. Helen Ginger Berrigan Chief U.S. District Judge, Eastern District of Louisiana “THE LAW IS A tool; a means to an end to build footsteps and attended the University of Wisconsin, obtaining a B.A. in psychology. After graduation, she a better society.” This statement defines the ap- moved to Washington, D.C., to pursue a master’s de- proach taken by Chief Judge Helen Ginger Ber- gree in journalism at American University, which she earned in 1971. From 1971 to 1972, she worked on rigan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern Capitol Hill as a volunteer legislative aide for Sen. Har- District of Louisiana. A practical problem solver old E. Hughes (D-Iowa) and then for Sen. Joseph E. Biden (D-Del.). She answered mail from the senators’ and self-described “social worker at heart,” Chief constituents and researched legislative issues. She ad- Judge Berrigan does not consider herself a legal mits that she probably never would have left Washing- ton had it not been for Charles Evers, the brother of scholar or a teacher in the traditional sense. civil rights leader Medgar Evers. In 1971, a friend told her about a volunteer oppor- tunity to work on Charles Evers’ political campaign for governor of Mississippi. She had never been to the South and longed to visit the area. Evers, the mayor of Fayette, Miss., was the first African-American to run for governor of that state. She traveled to Mississippi and volunteered to work for his campaign for a few weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Message from the Dean
    LAW BULLETIN 2007-2008 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY NEW ORLEANS COLLEGE OF LAW TABLE OF CONTENTS A MESSAGE FROM THE DEAN ........................................................................................... 1 THE UNIVERSITY AND THE COLLEGE OF LAW................................................................ 2 MISSION STATEMENT......................................................................................................... 3 STATEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE ......................................................................... 3 GOALS OF LOYOLA............................................................................................................ 5 LOYOLA CHARACTER AND COMMITMENT STATEMENT ................................................ 12 ADMISSIONS...................................................................................................................... 15 Admission Requirements.............................................................................................. 15 Application Procedure .................................................................................................. 16 Policies And Regulations.............................................................................................. 16 Transfer Applicants....................................................................................................... 17 Readmission.................................................................................................................. 17 Policy On Sexual And Other Forms Of Harassment
    [Show full text]
  • CIRCUIT COURT of APPEALS Criminal Justice Section Program
    SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT & THE 5TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS Criminal Justice Section Program Buck Files Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain & Harrison, P.C. 109 West Ferguson Street Tyler, Texas 75702-7203 (903) 595-3573 Friday, June 11, 2010 3:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. F. R. (Buck) Files, Jr. is a shareholder in the firm of Bain, Files, Jarrett, Bain and Harrison, P.C., in Tyler, Texas. He holds board certifications in criminal law from the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and in criminal trial advocacy from the National Board of Trial Advocacy. Buck is a charter member and former director of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. In 2007, he was honored by a resolution of TCDLA’s board of directors for having had more than 100 of his columns – “The Federal Corner” – published in the VOICE for the Defense. Buck is currently serving as a member of the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and as Chair of the State Bar’s Continuing Legal Education Committee. He is a former member of the State Bar’s board of directors and was named “Outstanding Third Year Director” in 2007. He also received a State Bar Presidential Citation for his work as Co-Chair of the State Bar’s Task Force on the Qualifications of Habeas Counsel in Capital Cases. In 2004, he was named the Defense Lawyer of the Year by the Criminal Justice Section of the State Bar. Buck received his B.A. degree from Austin College (1960) and his M.L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of Supreme Court Document
    No. 99-372 In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1999 In re CARL BERNOFSKY, Petitoner DR. CARL BERNOFSKY, Plaintiff - Petitioner, v. ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND (TULANE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE), Defendant - Respondent, Petition for Writ of Mandamus Petitioner’s Reply Brief CARL BERNOFSKY 6478 General Diaz Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70124 (504) 486-4639 Petitioner, Pro Se QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Respondent, Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, has called into question the relationship of the Honorable Ginger Berrigan with Tulane University. Petitioner, Dr. Carl Bernofsky, by means of the documentary evidence appended herewith, corrects errors of fact introduced by respondent. i TABLE OF CONTENTS QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW .................i TABLE OF CONTENTS............................... ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE.......................... 1 JUDGE BERRIGAN’S ADJUNCT PROFESSORSHIP...... 1 JUDGE BERRIGAN’S BOARD MEMBERSHIP ......... 2 TULANE’S AMISTAD RESEARCH CENTER .......... 3 CONCLUSION...................................... 3 SIGNATURE ................................... 4 APPENDIX....................................... A-i TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................... A-i EXHIBITS ................................... A-1 ii STATEMENT OF THE CASE I. Judge Berrigan’s Adjunct Professorship Respondent makes the claim that Judge Berrigan is not an adjunct faculty member at Tulane University and that her only involvement with teaching at Tulane was as a substitute teacher for the
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix in Re Carl Bernofsky V. Judicial Council of the United
    Appendix In re Carl Bernofsky v. Judicial Council of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Petition for Writ of Mandamus, 2017 No. Description 1 Petition of Nov. 2, 2016, “Grounds for Impeaching Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, Judge, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.” Submitted to all members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. 2 Cover letter of Nov. 2, 2016 from petitioner Carl Bernofsky to Hon. Carl E. Stewart, for the petition: “Grounds for Impeaching Helen “Ginger” Berrigan, Judge, Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.” Similar letters, together with the petition, were submitted to all members of the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit. 3 Order, signed Dec. 28. 2016 by Chief Judge Carl E. Stewart, “IN RE: The Complaint of Carl Bernofsky Against United States Senior District Judge Helen G. Berrigan, Eastern District of Louisiana, Under the Judicial Improvements Act of 2002.” Filed Jan. 4, 2017 as “Complaint Number: 05-17-90013.” 4 Cover letter of Jan. 4, 2017 from Fifth Circuit Deputy Clerk, Shelley E. Saltzman, to Carl Bernofsky, informing him of Judge Stewart’s dismissal of “Judicial Misconduct Complaint No. 05-17-90013.” 5 Petition to the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit for review of Judicial Misconduct Complaint No. 05-17-90013, submitted Jan. 18, 2017 by Carl Bernofsky to Lyle W. Cayce, Clerk, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 6 Order, signed Feb. 23, 2017 by U. S. Circuit Judge for the Judicial Council of the Fifth Circuit, Priscilla R. Owen, “No. 05-17-90013, Petition for Review by Carl Bernofsky of the Final Order Filed December 28, 2016 Dismissing Judicial Misconduct Complaint Against United States Senior District Judge Helen G.
    [Show full text]
  • Bench Bar Conference 2013
    Bench Bar Conference 2013 Professional or Not? You Be the Judge The Hon. Laurie A. White, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Moderator The Hon. Helen G. Berrigan, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of LA Robert J. David, Gainsburgh, Benjamin, David, Meunier & Warshauer, L.L.C. R. Patrick Vance, Jones Walker Sharonda R. Williams, City of New Orleans Course Number: 0200130419 1 Hour of CLE Sunday, April 21, 2013 9:00 am – 10:00 am Beau Rivage Resort and Casino Biloxi, Mississippi Biography of Judge Laurie A. White Orleans Parish Criminal District Court, Section “A” The Honorable Laurie A. White is the presiding District Court Judge at Criminal District Court in Orleans Parish, Section “A.” While she has general jurisdiction, she hears only criminal matters. Judge White was elected to the bench in November 2007 to fill a one year unexpired term and ran unopposed in July 2008 being re-elected to a six year term. Since being elected to the bench, Judge White, along with Judge Arthur Hunter of the Orleans Criminal Court, began the Orleans Re-Entry Court Workforce Development Program. Established by legislative enactment in 2010, the Re-Entry Court is an innovative model aimed at reducing recidivism in Louisiana. Before being elected to the bench, Judge White practiced in state and federal courts throughout Louisiana for twenty (20) years. She began her career as a prosecutor in Orleans and East Baton Rouge Parishes. She worked as a City Attorney defending the New Orleans Police Department in false arrest and brutality claims and general civil litigation matters.
    [Show full text]