DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 FURBEARER and TRAPPING FWP Montana Trapping and Hunting Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 FURBEARER and TRAPPING FWP Montana Trapping and Hunting Regulations 2020 FURBEARER AND TRAPPING FWP Montana Trapping and Hunting Regulations Bobcat Lynx Rufus TURN IN POACHERS: CALL 1-800-TIP-MONT fwp.mt.gov Regulations are Adopted by the Fish & Wildlife Commission License Availability Chart Excess Take (CR) - the take of a legally harvestable species after the Exposed Carcass or Bait (CR) – No trap or snare may be set within season is closed or an individual’s possession limit has been met. 30 feet of an exposed carcass or bait that is visible from above. Regulations for season dates, structures, and restrictions were License Requirements Cost adopted by the F&W Commission on August 13, 2020, under the Fur Dealer (MCA 87-4-301) – Any person or persons, firm, Inspection by Warden (MCA 87-1-502) - Wildlife taken must be $4 Resident company, or corporation engaging in or conducting wholly shown to FWP Enforcement personnel for inspection when requested. authority granted in MCA 87-1-301 and are valid from the date of (6-17, 62+) adoption, through June 30, 2021. The F&W Commission reserves or in part the business of buying or selling, trading or dealing Interstate Wildlife Violator Compact (IWVC) - Montana is the authority to amend the seasons, limits, and regulations herein Conservation Required Prerequisite $8 Resident within the state of Montana, in the skins or pelts of any animal a member of the IWVC. Under the compact, member states (18-62) if deemed necessary for wildlife management purposes. Statutes or animals, designated by the laws of Montana as furbearing or recognize suspensions of hunting, fishing, or trapping privileges. and other information, including other agencies’ restrictions, $10 Nonresident predatory animals. If such fur dealer resides in or the principal It is unlawful for a violator whose privilege to hunt, fish, or trap is are provided as a courtesy and do not fall under Commission Available to resident conservation place of business is within the state of Montana, that dealer shall suspended to obtain or attempt to obtain a license, tag, or permit authority. Martha Williams, Director. license holders 12 years of age or older. General be deemed a resident fur dealer. All other fur dealers should be in a member state. For more information, call 406-444-2452. Discrimination Prohibited – State and Federal laws, Title VI of Purchase by Feb. 28, 2021. Allows Trapper, $20 deemed nonresident fur dealers. Landowner Permission (MCA 87-6-415) Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act license holder to trap furbearers, hunt of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Resident Furbearers (MCA 87-6-101) – Furbearing animals are legally A resident or nonresident shall obtain permission of the landowner, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education or chase bobcat. Deadline for bobcat defined as beaver, otter, muskrat, mink, marten, fisher, wolverine, validation is Nov. 30, 2020. the lessee, or their agents before taking or attempting to take Amendments of 1972, prohibit discrimination on the basis of bobcat, swift fox, and lynx . There is currently no season for lynx or game animals, migratory game birds, nongame wildlife, predatory race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, or disability. Anyone Available to resident conservation for wolverine. Only Montana residents may hunt or trap furbearers animals, furbearers, upland game birds, or wolves while hunting believing he or she has been discriminated against (as described Youth license holders 6 through 11 years of and a license is required. Bobcats are the only furbearer that may be on private property. above) in any FWP program, activity, or facility may write to Trapper, age. Valid only for two furbearers – Free hunted in Montana. FWP Human Resources, 1420 East Sixth Avenue, PO Box 200701, Even if the land is not posted, hunters and trappers must have Resident mink and muskrat. Purchase by Feb. Ground Set (CR) – Any trap originally set in or on the land (soil, permission from the land owner, lessee, or their agent before Helena, MT 59620-0701 or the office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. 28, 2021. rock, etc.). This includes any traps elevated less than 48 inches Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. Any changes hunting or trapping on private property, regardless of whether the made to this printed publication can be found on the FWP website Applicant must give description of above the natural ground or current snow level. land is posted or not. or by inquiring at any local FWP office. owned or leased land, name, address, Nongame Wildlife (MCA 87-6-101) – means any wild mammal, Access to public land through private land requires permission of and resident ALS number. License bird, amphibian, reptile, fish, mollusk, crustacean, or other animal the private land owner, lessee, or their agent. Highlights not otherwise legally classified by Montana statute or regulation. Landowner holder restricted to trapping and Retrieval of all wildlife through private land requires permission of • Boundary change to swift fox portion of trapping district 6 Examples of nongame wildlife are badger, raccoon, and red fox. Trapper, hunting only on their owned property $1 the private landowner, lessee, or their agent. and season end date change for swift fox. Resident and leased lands. Issued only through There is no resident license required to trap nongame wildlife. • Marten harvest is now required to be called in. FWP offices. Deadline for bobcat Nonresidents must purchase a license in order to trap nongame (MCA 87-6-601) – A person may not use a snare trap for the • Marten trapping closures have been imposed to facilitate validation is Nov. 30, 2020. Purchase wildlife. purpose of snaring a fur-bearing animals, a predatory animal, or reintroduction of the species to the Little Belt Mountains see by Feb. 28, 2021. Non-target Capture (CR)- Capture of any animal that cannot be a nongame species unless the consent of the landowner has been obtained for a set on private property; and the snare trap is set in a marten regulations on page 9 for specific locations. lawfully trapped, including domestic animals. Available only to nonresident manner and at a time so that it will not unduly endanger livestock. • Two swivels, including a center swivel on the base of the trap, conservation license holders 12 years of Predatory Animals (MCA 87-6-101) – coyote, weasel, skunk, and License and Permit Possession/Use (MCA 87-6-304) are required for all ground set foothold traps. age or older, whose state of residence civet cat. There is no resident license required to trap predators. It is unlawful to: • Inspection of bobcat, fisher, otter, and swift fox harvests can has nonresident trapper licenses Nonresidents must purchase a license in order to trap predators. Nonresident • Hunt or trap or attempt to hunt or trap for any furbearing animal now be completed within 10 days of the calender close of the available to Montana trappers. Issued $250 Relaxing Snare – A relaxing snare has a snare lock that allows the Trapper unless the person is carrying the required license or permit at season. Formerly it was within 10 days of the harvest. only through FWP offices. Season snare loop to release constriction pressure on the captured animal the time. • Roads and Trails definition has been clarified, see roads and Dates: Oct. 16-Apr. 15. Valid only for when the cable is not taut (e.g., when the animal stops pulling, it • Refuse to produce a license or permit and the identification trails information under the setbacks section on page 5 predatory animals, nongame wildlife, will loosen). This means that the locking device on the snare cable used in purchasing a license or permit for inspection to a game operates both ways allowing the snare cable to move back and Reminders and wolves. Purchase by Feb. 28, 2021. warden. forth to some degree. Locks that only close or that use springs or • Alter or change a license in any material manner. • Setbacks apply to all public, federal, and state lands for the Required to trap on State School other powering devices to hold them closed are not considered Trust Lands. Contact Montana • Loan or transfer any license to another person. trapping of predatory animals and non-game wildlife as well Special DNRC relaxing snares. See page 15 for examples of relaxing snares. Department of Natural Resources • Use a license issued to another person. as furbearers at any time. Recreational Free and Conservation to apply for this Trap (MCA 87-6-101) – to take or harvest or participate in the • Have physical control over a valid and unused hunting license • Special trapping regulations in Lynx Protection Zones Use License license (406-444-9726). Apply by taking or harvesting of any wildlife protected by the laws of the or permit issued to another person while in any location that • Trapping on Fish, Wildlife & Parks lands, which includes Sep. 30, 2020. state by setting or placing any mechanical device, snare, deadfall, the species to be hunted may inhabit. This prohibition does not Wildlife Management Areas, Fishing Access Sites, and State pit, or device intended to take wildlife or to remove wildlife from Resident apply to a person who is carrying or has physical control over a Parks requires, written authorization. Available to resident conservation any of these devices. Hound license or permit issued to that person’s spouse or to any minor license holders 12 years of age or $5 • Trappers are required to obtain a free Special Recreational Training Water Set (CR)– Any trap originally set in or on any body of water. when the spouse or minor is hunting with that person. older. Purchase by Feb.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 5340 Exchanges Missoula, Ninemile, Plains/Thompson
    5340 EXCHANGES MISSOULA, NINEMILE, PLAINS/THOMPSON FALLS, SEELEY LAKE, AND SUPERIOR RANGER DISTRICTS LOLO NATIONAL FOREST MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION LAND EXCHANGE MTM 92893 MINERAL POTENTIAL REPORT Minerals Examiner: _____________________________________ Norman B. Smyers, Geologist-Lolo and Flathead National Forests _____________________________________ Date Regional Office Review: _____________________________________ Michael J. Burnside, Northern Region Certified Review Mineral Examiner _____________________________________ Date Abstract-DNRC/Lolo NF Land Exchange Mineral Report: Page A-1 ABSTRACT The non-federal and federal lands involved in the proposed Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC) Land Exchange are located across western Montana and within the exterior boundaries of the lands administered by the Lolo National Forest. The proposed land exchange includes approximately 12,123 acres of non-federal land and 10,150 acres of federal land located in six counties--Granite, Lincoln, Missoula, Mineral, Powell, and Sanders. For the Federal government, the purpose of the exchange is to improve land ownership patterns for more efficient and effective lands management by: reducing the need to locate landline and survey corners; reducing the need for issuing special-use and right-of-way authorizations; and facilitating the implementation of landscape level big game winter range vegetative treatments. With the exception of one DNRC parcel and six Federal parcels, the mineral estates of the parcels involved in the proposed land exchange are owned by either the State of Montana or the U.S. Government and can be conveyed with the corresponding surface estates. The exceptions are: the DNRC Sunrise parcel; and, for the U.S. Government, the Graham Mountain 2,Graham Mountain 10, Fourmile 10, St.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness-Watcher-Summer-2021
    Wilderness WILDERNESS WATCH eeping Wilderness Wild WATCHER The Quarterly Newsletter of Wilderness Watch Volume 32 • Number 2 • Summer 2021 Should We Poison the Scapegoat? by Gary Macfarlane he Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife review of actions that are done pursuant to section 4(c) and Parks (FWP) recently put forth a five- of the Wilderness Act. The extensive helicopter and other year plan to poison 67 miles of the North motorized equipment and transport proposed in this TFork of the Blackfoot River and three lakes in the project are activities that are presumptively prohibited Scapegoat Wilderness. The Scapegoat is the southern in Wilderness under Section 4(c). … If a CE can be used anchor of the famed Bob Marshall Wilderness Com- in Wilderness to exempt projects of this size and scope, plex, an area of 1.6 utilizing a wide array of million unbroken acres generally prohibited uses of designated Wil- and significantly altering derness that is home ecological processes, then to rare species such as one has to wonder if any grizzly bears, wolves, project ever would rise to and wolverines. the level of an EA or EIS in Wilderness no matter The proposal poses a how harmful. myriad of problems beyond poisoning The background behind streams and lakes this shows how ill-ad- and much of the life vised the plan is, beyond that lives in them. its inappropriate impacts There’s the 93 he- to Wilderness. There licopter flights and North Fork of the Blackfoot River, Scapegoat Wilderness. USFS were no trout or likely landings, plus the use other fish historically of motorboats, pumps, above the North Fork and gas-powered generators—all in a place where Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Conservation Plan Benton Lake National Wildlife
    CHAPTER 3–Refuge Resources and Description inean T inean © Jeff V Rocky Mountain Front Conservation Area This chapter describes the characteristics and re- tics include climate, climate change, geography and sources of the Benton Lake National Wildlife Ref- physiography, soils, water resources, water quality, uge Complex and how existing or past management water rights, and air quality. or other influences have affected these resources. The affected environment addresses the physical, biological, and social aspects that could be affected Climate by management under this CCP. The Service used published and unpublished data, as noted in the bib- The refuge complex covers more than 2,700 square liography, to quantify what is known about it. miles and spans the Continental Divide in north- western and north-central Montana. The Continen- tal Divide exerts a marked influence on the climate of adjacent areas. West of the Divide, the climate 3.1 Physical Environment might be termed a modified, north Pacific Coast type, while to the east, climatic characteristics are The following sections describe the physical charac- decidedly continental. On the west of the mountain teristics of the refuge complex. Physical characteris- barrier, winters are milder, precipitation is more 44 Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Benton Lake National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Montana evenly distributed throughout the year, summers There is no freeze-free period in many higher valleys are cooler in general, and winds are lighter than on of the western mountains, but hardy and nourish- the eastern side. According to the National Oceanic ing grasses thrive in such places, producing large and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), there is amounts of quality grazing for stock (NOAA 2011b).
    [Show full text]
  • June 9, 2021 by Email and Overnight Delivery Tom Vilsack Secretary U.S
    June 9, 2021 By Email and Overnight Delivery Tom Vilsack Leanne Marten Secretary Regional Forester U.S. Department of Agriculture Northern Region 1400 Independence Ave. S.W. U.S. Forest Service Washington, DC 20250 26 Fort Missoula Road [email protected] Missoula, MT 59804 [email protected] [email protected] Meryl Harrell Mary Farnsworth Deputy Under Secretary Regional Forester Natural Resources and Environment Intermountain Region U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave. S.W. 324 25th Street Washington, DC 20250 Ogden, UT 84401 [email protected] [email protected] Chris French Glenn Casamassa Acting Deputy Under Secretary Regional Forester Natural Resources and Environment Pacific Northwest Region U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave. S.W. 1220 SW 3rd Avenue Washington, DC 20250 Portland, OR 97204 [email protected] [email protected] Vicki Christiansen Chief U.S. Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 1400 Independence Ave. S.W. Washington, DC 20250 [email protected] Re: Petition for Regulatory Protection of Wilderness Character in Response to Idaho and Montana’s New Wolf Laws and Wolf-Removal Programs Dear Secretary Vilsack and Agriculture Department officials, This is a petition for regulatory action by the U.S. Forest Service pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 553(e) and 7 C.F.R. § 1.28. I am writing on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity, NORTHERN ROCKIES OFFICE 313 EAST MAIN STREET BOZEMAN, MT 59715 T: 406.586.9699 F: 406.586.9695 [email protected] WWW.EARTHJUSTICE.ORG Defenders of Wildlife, Friends of the Clearwater, Humane Society of the United States, Humane Society Legislative Fund, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, Montana Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, Western Watersheds Project, Wilderness Watch, and Wolves of the Rockies (“Petitioners”).
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness in the Northern Rockies| a Missoula-Lolo National Forest Perspective
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1993 Wilderness in the northern Rockies| A Missoula-Lolo National Forest perspective Todd L. Denison The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Denison, Todd L., "Wilderness in the northern Rockies| A Missoula-Lolo National Forest perspective" (1993). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4091. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4091 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. MontanaUniversity of WILDERNESS IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES: A MISSOULA-LOLO NATIONAL FOREST PERSPECTIVE By Todd L. Denison B.A. University of Montana, 1986 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana 1993 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School UMI Number: EP36297 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • West Zone Report Template
    Marshall Woods Restoration Project Heritage Report Prepared by: Sydney Bacon 9/30/2014 1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT Introduction This report discusses the results of the Lolo National Forest Heritage Program’s evaluation of potential impacts to cultural resources that may be caused by the proposed actions of the Marshall Woods Restoration Project. All materials referenced herein are maintained at the Heritage Program, Lolo National Forest in Missoula, Montana. Cultural resources can span both prehistoric and historic temporal periods, and may include buildings, structures, sites, areas, and objects of scientific, historic, or social value. They are irreplaceable, nonrenewable resources documenting the legacy of past human use of the area currently administered by the Forest Service. Forest Plan Direction and Regulatory Framework The primary legislation governing cultural resource management is the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended 1976, 1980, and 1992). Federal Regulations 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties), 36 CFR 296 (Protection of Archaeological Resources), and Forest Service Manual 2360 (FSM 2360, Heritage Program Management) provides the framework for consultation, identification, evaluation, and protection of cultural resources on National Forest System lands. In Montana, the Forest Service conducts cultural resources reviews of proposed actions in accordance with the “Programmatic Agreement Regarding Cultural Resources Management on National Forests in the State of Montana” (USDA 1995). Stemming from this PA is the “Site Identification Strategy Prepared for the Bitterroot, Flathead, and Lolo National Forests” (McLeod 2003), which is used to help identify cultural resources on the Lolo National Forest. Furthermore, the Lolo National Forest Plan (USDA 1986) identifies specific standards that are required for cultural resources in different management areas across the Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Posewitz
    INDUCTION 2016 Table ofof ContentsContents Table of Contents Introduction 4 Pat McVay 12 Introduction 4 Bob Munson 13 Margaret Adams 6 Bob Munson 13 Margaret Adams 6 Jim Posewitz 14 Jim Posewitz 14 BobBob Anderson Anderson 7 7 Bob Ream 15 Bob Ream 15 KenKen & &Florence Florence 8 8 Tony Schoonen 16 Baldwin Baldwin Tony Schoonen 16 George Darrow 9 Bearhead Swaney 17 George Darrow 9 Bearhead Swaney 17 Jim Goetz 10 Pat Williams 18 Jim Goetz 10 Bud Lilly 11 SponsorsPat Williams 2018 PatBud McVay Lilly 1211 Sponsors 20 22 Photo by Jesse Varnado Photo by Jesse Varnado 33 IntroductionTable of Contents Introduction 4 Bob Munson 13 Margaret Adams 6 Jim Posewitz 14 Bob Anderson 7 Bob Ream 15 Ken & Florence 8 Tony Schoonen 16 Baldwin George Darrow 9 Bearhead Swaney 17 Jim Goetz 10 Pat Williams 18 Bud Lilly 11 Sponsors 20 Pat McVay 12 424 e crossed the Rocky Mountain divide on the tenth day of October, 1857 … Instead of the gray sagebrush covered plains of Snake River, we saw smooth rounded grass that waved in “W the wind like a field of grain. A beautiful little clear stream ran northwest on its way to join the Missouri River. … Soon as we came to the divide … bands of antelope … were in sight all of the time … We also discovered as we moved down the valley to Beaverhead that there was plenty of game, consisting of blacktailed deer, big horn or mountain sheep, and also many bands of elk.” This description of Montana comes from one of Two of America’s great national parks sit as the Montana Outdoor Hall of Fame’s inductees, bookends, with the Northern Rockies sprawling Granville Stuart.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bill to Establish the Lee Metcalf Wilderness and Management Area in the State of Montana, and for Other Purposes
    98 S.96 Title: A bill to establish the Lee Metcalf Wilderness and Management Area in the State of Montana, and for other purposes. Sponsor: Sen Melcher, John [MT] (introduced 1/26/1983) Cosponsors (None) Latest Major Action: 10/31/1983 Became Public Law No: 98-140. SUMMARY AS OF: 10/6/1983--Passed House amended. (There are 4 other summaries) (Measure passed House, amended) Lee Metcalf Wilderness and Management Act of 1983 - Designates specified lands within the Beaverhead and Gallatin National Forests in Montana and within the Dillon Resource Area in Montana as the Lee Metcalf Wilderness. Provides that the area lying adjacent to the Monument Mountain and Taylor- Hilgard units of the Lee Metcalf Wilderness shall be managed to protect the wildlife and recreational values of such area. Withdraws such area from all forms of appropriations under mining, mineral leasing, and geothermal leasing laws. Provides that such area shall be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain its presently existing wilderness character, with no commercial timber harvest or additional road construction permitted. Requires that motor vehicles be allowed in the area only where they are compatible with the protection and propagation of wildlife in the area. Provides that the following areas have been adequately studied for wilderness and need not be managed to protect their suitability for wilderness designation pending revision of the initial plans required for such lands by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974: (1) the Mount Henry Wilderness Study Area in the Kootenai National Forest; (2) portions of the Taylor-Hilgard Wilderness Study Area in the Beaverhead and Gallatin National Forests; (3) certain lands in the Gallatin and Beaverhead National Forests identified as area 1549 in the Forest Service Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (II) Final Environmental Statement (dated May 3, 1979); and (4) the proposed Tongue River Breaks Wilderness in the Custer National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Strata Energy Inc.), 2016, Ross ISR Project Annual Surety Estimate, Revised March 2016, March 11, 2016
    Application for Amendment of USNRC Source Materials License SUA-1601, Ross ISR Project, for the Kendrick Expansion Area RAI Question and Answer Responses for the Kendrick Expansion Area Environmental Report Docket #40-09091 Prepared for: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Prepared by: Strata Energy, Inc. 1900 W. Warlow Drive, Bldg. A P.O. Box 2318 Gillette, WY 82717-2318 August 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS General ............................................................................................................... 1 ER RAI GEN-1(A) Response ...................................................................................... 1 ER RAI GEN-1(B) and (C) Response .......................................................................... 3 ER RAI GEN-2(A) Response .................................................................................... 15 ER RAI GEN-2(B) Response .................................................................................... 16 ER RAI GEN-2(C) Response .................................................................................... 17 ER RAI GEN-2(D) Response .................................................................................... 18 ER RAI GEN-3 Response ......................................................................................... 20 ER RAI GEN-4 Response ......................................................................................... 22 ER RAI GEN-5 Response ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Air Resource Management
    Region 1 Lake Monitoring Thomas Dzomba – Air Fire & Aviation Mark Story – Gallatin NF Jill Grenon – Bridger Teton NF (R4) Objectives Overview of Region 1 Air Program Lake Monitoring & Results – purpose, approach, when, where, lake selection, parameters, analysis, conclusions, management difference, lessons Unknowns and questions? Selway Bitterroot Wilderness Bob Marshall Wilderness Lee Metcalf Wilderness AQRV/WAQV Monitoring • Particulate Matter • Visibility • Lakes • Lichens • Snow • Precipitation USFS R1 Wilderness Air Quality Monitoring Plan Mark Story - Gallatin National Forest Thomas Dzomba - USFS R1/R4 Air Fire & Aviation Jill Grenon - Gallatin National Forest & Montana State University February 1, 2008 USFS R1 Class 1 Wilderness Areas – AQRV’s monitoring BMW SGW CMW SBW APW GMW MMW item Phase 3 Lakes Upper & Lower Libby North Kootenai & Lakes Shasta Lakes IMPROVE MONT1 & GLAC1* MONT1 CABI1 & GLAC1* SULA1 & SAWT1* SULA1 GAMO1 MONT1 & GLAC1* visibility IMPROVE site IMPROVE site IMPROVE site IMPROVE site IMPROVE IMPROVE site IMPROVE site site Lichens 12 reference sites 3 reference sites – 16 reference sites – 10 reference 3 reference sites 4 reference sites – – 2002 & 2003, 1992, 2010 1992 - 1994, 2008 sites – 1992, – 2000 - 2001, 2002, 2010 2010 2008 2008 NADP Glacier NP MT05 Glacier NP MT05* Glacier NP MT05* Lost Trail Pass MT97 Lost Trail Clancy MT07* Glacier NP MT05 NADP site* and Clancy MT07* and Priest River NADP site Pass MT97 NADP site NADP site NADP sites ExpFst ID02* NADP NADP site sites Snow USGS snow USGS snow USGS snow
    [Show full text]