DOCSLIB.ORG

Can We Recreate Or Restore Intertidal Habitats for Shorebirds&Quest;

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Can We Recreate Or Restore Intertidal Habitats for Shorebirds&Quest; Can we recreate or restore intertidal habitats for shorebirds? PHILIP W. ATKINSON British Trust for Ornithology,The Nunnery, Thetford,Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK, e-maih phil.atkinson @bto. org Atkinson,P.W. 2003. Can we recreateor restoreintertidal habitats for shorebirds?Wader StudyGroup Bull. 100: 67-72. Lossof intertidalhabitat to developmentcontinues apace. Coupled with the long-termeffects of climatechange therewill be an increasingneed to createnew areasof intertidalhabitats if shorebirdpopulations and flyways areto be effectivelyconserved. Habitat restoration and creation efforts in the US, Europeand Japan have shown that creatingsalt marshis often a hit or miss affair as new sitestend to supportdifferent communities and a differentrange of ecologicalfunctions to surroundingareas. Creating mudflats often meets with a higherdegree of successif sedimentsupply is sufficientas benthicinvertebrates and shorebirdscolonise relatively quickly. Sitesin higherenergy environments tend to reachequilibrium quicker than lower energyenvironments. Many restorationsites tend to be small and thus factors,such as enclosure,tend to impact on the birds that use the sites.Not only do thefactors controlling the restoration need to be betterunderstood so that high quality habitats canbe producedbut alsothe impactsof creatingnew habitatson shorebirdsat the populationlevel. This will requirea muchbetter understanding of flyways,migration strategies and other factors controlling populations at a large scale. INTRODUCTION many countrieswhere this hasbeen an issue,there has been an acceptancethat lossof habitatswill needto be compen- One of the greatestthreats facing shorebirds has been the loss satedfor by the restorationor creationof new habitats. or degradationof breeding,staging and winteringhabitats. Many countriesnow have a policy of compensatingfor This has been global in extent and there is probably not a lost wetland habitats. The compensationwill vary in re- flyway that has not been affected by large-scaleloss and sponseto eachparticular situation, e.g. compensationfor a deterioration of wetland habitat. Total wetland loss world- the lossof an areathrough development will be very differ- wide has .been estimated at 50% of those that have been in ent to the strategyused to mitigatethe widespreadeffects of existencesince 1900 (Dugan 1993, OECD 1996). In north- changingclimatic conditions and accelerating sea-level rise. em countriesmuch of thisloss took place during the first half Compensationfor loss of a particularsite usually involves of thetwentieth century but during the latter part, tropical and the creation of a new site elsewhere. Solutions to sea-level sub-tropicalwetlands were increasinglybeing degradedor rise will necessarilyinclude a larger scale approachwhich lost, predominantlythrough conversion to agriculturaluse, will include a mix of maintaining current sea defences which is the major causeof wetland loss worldwide. By throughsoft or hard engineeringtechniques, abandonment 1985, it was estimated that 56-65% of wetlands had been or managedrealignment, i.e. takingback sea walls andcreat- drainedfor intensiveagriculture in Europeand North America, ing intertidalhabitats (Dixon et al. 1998).There is hugepoten- 27% in Asia, 6% in South America and 2% in Africa, a total tial to replace lost areas and create valuable habitat for of 26% lossto agricultureworldwide (OECD 1996). These waterbirds. figures mostly refer to freshwaterhabitats and the global The sciencebehind the restorationand creationof many coastalwetland resourceis generallypoorly known. How- terrestrialhabitats is well advanced.However, intertidal habi- ever, changeswithin thesehabitats (including tidal flats, salt tats posespecial problems for restorationbecause they are marshes,sea grass beds, mangroves, saline lagoons, shingle topographicallyand ecologicallycomplex and they support banks and transitional brackish-water habitats) have been many speciesof animals, some of which require specific everybit aslarge asfreshwater habitats. In the United King- habitatsand linkagesto other terrestrialor marine habitats. dom, 23% of estuaries and 50% of salt marshes have been Moreoverthey exist and evolve within dynamiccoastal set- drained since Roman times (Davidson et al. 1991, Moser et tings,subject to changingtidal levels,salinities and long term al. 1996). mechanicalprocesses that are associatedwith sea-levelrise Added to this continuinganthropogenic loss will be the andclimate change (Atkinson et al. 2001). Often thesecom- creeping effects of changing environmental conditions plexities are ignored and there is a tendencyfor created throughclimate changeand rising sea levels. As a result, coastalhabitats to lack the diversityseen in naturalareas and managersof estuarineand open shorehabitats, which sup- supportonly generalistspecies. Also, created sites rarely portimportant populations of waterbirds(defined here as any follow expectedpaths and the stablestates that are reached speciesdependent on wetlandhabitats at any time duringits often differ from what was expected,despite multi-million lifecycle),will facenew challengesto mitigatethe effectsof dollar investments(Zedler & Callaway 1999), leadingto the both direct habitat loss and thesechanging environmental conclusionthat the currentstate of restorationtheory applied conditions.The responseto thesechanges will differ, but in to coastalhabitats does not necessarilylead to predictability. 67 Bulletin100April2003 68 Wader Study Group Bulletin To effectivelymitigate this loss,there is a greatdeal to in the Wadden Sea. Although only a fraction of the area learn,not only aboutthe processesunderlying coastal habi- presentabout 2,000 yearsago, theseintertidal habitats are tat restoration or creation, but also those that control the still the largestcontiguous area of salt marshin Europe,and shorebirdpopulations that many of theseareas will be created the Wadden Sea is Europe'slargest intertidal wetland cov- for. The purposeof thispaper is to assessthe stateof know- eringsome 8,000 km 2. However,in the50 yearsto 1987, ledgeabout creating or restoringsalt marshes and tidal flats 33% of the areawas lost to embankments(Dugan 1993) and for shorebirds,and to ask what we need to know to be better new marshes formed in front of the new sea walls. Within equippedto predictthe outcomes of creationand restoration The Netherlands, there are over 17,000 ha of man-made salt effortson shorebirdpopulations. As mostresearch has been marshes,created specifically for flood defence purposes carded out on thesetwo habitats,this paper concentrateson rather than for any other environmentalbenefit (Esselink them.However, it mustbe acknowledgedthat much needs to 1998).This policyis changingand salt marshes on theNorth be doneto addressthe issuesof creatingand restoring other Seacoasts of Germany,Belgium, The Netherlandsand Den- intertidal habitatssuch as mangrovesand sea grassbeds mark,which are of high conservationimportance because of whichare alsoimportant for waterbirds(e.g. Field 1968). the large concentrationsof wintering,passage and breeding waterfowl that they support,are now increasinglybeing CURRENT STATE OF COASTAL WETLAND managedfor natureconservation purposes (Esselink 2000). RESTORATION SCIENCE Again little hasbeen published in the peer-reviewedlitera- ture althoughthe createdmarshes at Sieperdain The Neth- The scienceof restoringcoastal habitats has been developed erlandsare a notableexception (Castelijns et al. 1997, Eert- in the United States for three decades and there is now a mann et al. 2002). substantialand growingbody of literaturecovering the ex- Elsewherein the world,Japan has led the way in creating pertisethat has been acquired there on the creationand re- tidal mudflatsand, according to the EnvironmentAgency of storation of wetlands. Of most relevance to this review, are Japan,37 coveringapproximately 900 ha were createdbe- those studies that have focussed on efforts to create and re- tween 1973 and 1998 (WAVE 2001a,b). This is small com- storetidal wetlands(e.g. Broomeet al. (1988), Zedleret al. paredto the lossof nearly4,000 ha (42% to reclamation) (1988) & Zedler (1996)), despitethe fact thatmany of them over the sametime period(WAVE 2001a,b).The total area have concentratedon physicalfeatures with only limited of tidal flats in Japanis 51,443 ha (EnvironmentAgency of monitoringof plants,fish andinvertebrates. This hasculmi- Japan1997). Six of thenewly created mudflats were directed natedin the productionof practicalhandbooks for the re- towardscreating areas for birds,but there are few accessi- storationof tidal wetlands(e.g. Zedler 2001). A recentspe- ble data with which to assess success. cial issueof WetlandsEcology and Managementfocused Researchhas therefore been geographically rather limited uponthe beneficial use of dredgematerial for therestoration andfocussed on particularhabitats or ecosystems.One of the of US salt marshesand mudflats (Streever 2000). Unvege- largestissues, rarely tackled in moststudies, has been a de- tated mudflats are not classed as wetlands under S.404 of the tailed assessmentof the physical,temporal and biological US Clean Water Act and thus intertidal habitat creation work factorsthat determinethe resultinghabitats and communi- in the US has focussed on the creation of salt marshes. As a ties and how theserelate to the rangeof variationfound in consequence,mudflat creation schemes in theUS haveusu- naturalareas. Most studieshave simply describedthe bio- ally beenmotivated by a desireto
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States
    Pfego-/6^7fV SDMS DocID 463450 ^7'7/ Biological Services Program \ ^ FWS/OBS-79/31 DECEMBER 1979 Superfund Records Center ClassificaHioFF^^^ V\Aetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States KPHODtKtD BY NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFOR/V^ATION SERVICE U.S. IKPARTMEN TOF COMMERCt SPRINGMflO, VA. 22161 Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior (USDI) C # The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish . and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues which have an impact on fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the Program is as follows: 1. To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of Information on natural fish and wildlife resources, par­ ticularly with respect to environmental impact assessment. 2. To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decision­ makers in the identification and resolution of problems asso­ ciated with major land and water use changes. 3. To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relating to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process, to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Biological Services research activities and technical assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, the decisionmakers involved and their information neeids, and an evaluation of the state^f-the-art to Identify information gaps and determine priorities. This Is a strategy to assure that the products produced and disseminated will be timely and useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Stable States of Tidal Marsh Vegetation Patterns and Channel Complexity
    ECOHYDROLOGY Ecohydrol. (2016) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/eco.1755 Alternative stable states of tidal marsh vegetation patterns and channel complexity K. B. Moffett1* and S. M. Gorelick2 1 School of the Environment, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, USA 2 Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA ABSTRACT Intertidal marshes develop between uplands and mudflats, and develop vegetation zonation, via biogeomorphic feedbacks. Is the spatial configuration of vegetation and channels also biogeomorphically organized at the intermediate, marsh-scale? We used high-resolution aerial photographs and a decision-tree procedure to categorize marsh vegetation patterns and channel geometries for 113 tidal marshes in San Francisco Bay estuary and assessed these patterns’ relations to site characteristics. Interpretation was further informed by generalized linear mixed models using pattern-quantifying metrics from object-based image analysis to predict vegetation and channel pattern complexity. Vegetation pattern complexity was significantly related to marsh salinity but independent of marsh age and elevation. Channel complexity was significantly related to marsh age but independent of salinity and elevation. Vegetation pattern complexity and channel complexity were significantly related, forming two prevalent biogeomorphic states: complex versus simple vegetation-and-channel configurations. That this correspondence held across marsh ages (decades to millennia)
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Artificial Wildbird Tidal Mudflat in Fukuoka, Japan
    1 The Evolution of the MIA DOCTO + SCOTT WALLS Jacob Bintliff, Mariana Chavez, Daniela Peña Corvillon, Artificial Wildbird Tidal Johanna Hoffman, Katelyn Walker, UC Berkeley, LA 205 Studio Mudflat in Fukuoka, Japan Spring 2012 2 PRESENTATION CONTENT INTRODUCTION // SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS // WETLAND DESIGN // HUMAN INTERFACE // CONCLUSIONS 3 CONTEXT 4 5 6 CONTEXT BEFORE PRESENT 7 ISLAND CITY 8 9 ITERATIONS ORIGINAL WETLAND PLAN 10 ITERATIONS JAPAN STUDENT WORKSHOP 11 ITERATIONS 2008 Land Use Plan ~8.5 - 9 ha ~12 ha ~10 ha ~10 ~7 ha Setup of the central area ~8.75 ha ~38.25 ha We will establish a lively ~7 ha interactive space by inviting urban functions such as commercial and ~ 6.75 ha corporate functions, and dissemination of information on education, ~2.25 ha Wild Bird Park 3.9 ha 3.1 ha School and Amenities culture, and art. Further, public transportation Green Space facilities and facilities for 4.1 ha convenience are invited Assigned Facilities Teriha Town to improve the business Hospital ~18 ha environment in the area. Apartments 4.1+ ha Joint Independent Houses Spcialist Clinic 1.8 ha ~1.5 ha Commercial Elderly Elderly Center? Center Planned Subdivision 1.6 ha 1.2 ha Coporate (Sold) 0.9 ha Planned Use/Mixed Use Idustrial and hatches based on legend color code and denote use type Research & Development Currently Built Port Warf 1000 m UC BERKELEY LAND USE PLAN 12 ITERATIONS UC BERKELEY LAND USE PLAN 13 ITERATIONS 16 Hectare Wild Bird Park UC BERKELEY - JAPAN WETLAND DESIGN 14 DESIGN GOALS Provide natural habitat for migrating bird species
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 3 Unit 2 Overview Open Ocean Habitats Introduction
    G3 U2 OVR GRADE 3 UNIT 2 OVERVIEW Open Ocean Habitats Introduction The open ocean has always played a vital role in the culture, subsistence, and economic well-being of Hawai‘i’s inhabitants. The Hawaiian Islands lie in the Pacifi c Ocean, a body of water covering more than one-third of the Earth’s surface. In the following four lessons, students learn about open ocean habitats, from the ocean’s lighter surface to the darker bottom fl oor thousands of feet below the surface. Although organisms are scarce in the deep sea, there is a large diversity of organisms in addition to bottom fi sh such as polycheate worms, crustaceans, and bivalve mollusks. They come to realize that few things in the open ocean have adapted to cope with the increased pressure from the weight of the water column at that depth, in complete darkness and frigid temperatures. Students fi nd out, through instruction, presentations, and website research, that the vast open ocean is divided into zones. The pelagic zone consists of the open ocean habitat that begins at the edge of the continental shelf and extends from the surface to the ocean bottom. This zone is further sub-divided into the photic (sunlight) and disphotic (twilight) zones where most ocean organisms live. Below these two sub-zones is the aphotic (darkness) zone. In this unit, students learn about each of the ocean zones, and identify and note animals living in each zone. They also research and keep records of the evolutionary physical features and functions that animals they study have acquired to survive in harsh open ocean habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Introduction to the Shantou Intertidal Wetland, Southern China
    AA BriefBrief IntroductionIntroduction toto thethe ShantouShantou IntertidalIntertidal Wetland,Wetland, SouthernSouthern ChinaChina Y.Y. W.W. ZhouaZhoua*.*. G.G. Z.Z. ChenChen SchoolSchool ofof EnvironmentalEnvironmental ScienceScience andand Engineering,Engineering, SunSun YatYat--sensen University,University, Guangzhou,Guangzhou, ChinaChina PR;PR; ** EE--mail:mail: [email protected]@163.com 11 IntroductionIntroduction • Shantou City is one of the most developed cities in southeast coastal area of China. • It had a high population of 4,846,400 . The population density was 2,348 per km2, GDP was 1,700 US $,in 2003. • The current use of the Shantou Intertidal Wetland includes: • briny and limnetic aquaculture, • reclamation for farmland and municipal estate, • transition to the salt field or tourism park, • natural wetland as the habitat of resident and migratory wildlife. 2.2. CharacteristicsCharacteristics ofof ShantouShantou IntertidalIntertidal WetlandWetland 2.1 Environmental characteristics The total area of the Shantou Intertidal Wetland is 1,435.29 ha . The demonstration site’s area is 3,475.2 ha , including 4 parts: Fig. 1 Demonstrated content of sub demonstration sites No Demon site Demonstrated Content Area/ha 1 Hexi biodiversity of water weed 512.4 2 Sanyuwei aquiculture and the biological treatment of waste water 1639.5 3 Suaiwang secondary mangrove for birds habitat 388.7 4 Waisha Eco-tourism 934.6 2.22.2 ClimateClimate • The climate is warm all year round with high temperatures and abundant light, and clearly differentiated dry and wet seasons. • Mean annual duration of sunshine: 954.2 hrs. • Historical average air temperature : 23.1 °C. • Average high temperature :38.8 °C • Average low temperature : 15.8 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Swamp Forest (Typic Subtype)
    MARITIME SWAMP FOREST (TYPIC SUBTYPE) Concept: Maritime Swamp Forests are wetland forests of barrier islands and comparable coastal spits and back-barrier islands, dominated by tall trees of various species. The Typic Subtype includes most examples, which are not dominated by Acer, Nyssa, or Fraxinus, not by Taxodium distichum. Canopy dominants are quite variable among the few examples. Distinguishing Features: Maritime Shrub Swamps are distinguished from other barrier island wetlands by dominance by tree species of (at least potentially) large stature. The Typic Subtype is dominated by combinations of Nyssa, Fraxinus, Liquidambar, Acer, or Quercus nigra, rather than by Taxodium or Salix. Maritime Shrub Swamps are dominated by tall shrubs or small trees, particularly Salix, Persea, or wetland Cornus. Some portions of Maritime Evergreen Forest are marginally wet, but such areas are distinguished by the characteristic canopy dominants of that type, such as Quercus virginiana, Quercus hemisphaerica, or Pinus taeda. The lower strata also are distinctive, with wetland species occurring in Maritime Swamp Forest; however, some species, such as Morella cerifera, may occur in both. Synonyms: Acer rubrum - Nyssa biflora - (Liquidambar styraciflua, Fraxinus sp.) Maritime Swamp Forest (CEGL004082). Ecological Systems: Central Atlantic Coastal Plain Maritime Forest (CES203.261). Sites: Maritime Swamp Forests occur on barrier islands and comparable spits, in well-protected dune swales, edges of dune ridges, and on flats adjacent to freshwater sounds. Soils: Soils are wet sands or mucky sands, most often mapped as Duckston (Typic Psammaquent) or Conaby (Histic Humaquept). Hydrology: Most Maritime Swamp Forests have shallow seasonal standing water and nearly permanently saturated soils. Some may rarely be flooded by salt water during severe storms, but areas that are severely or repeatedly flooded do not recover to swamp forest.
    [Show full text]
  • PESHTIGO RIVER DELTA Property Owner
    NORTHEAST - 10 PESHTIGO RIVER DELTA WETLAND TYPES Drew Feldkirchner Floodplain forest, lowland hardwood, swamp, sedge meadow, marsh, shrub carr ECOLOGY & SIGNIFICANCE supports cordgrass, marsh fern, sensitive fern, northern tickseed sunflower, spotted joe-pye weed, orange This Wetland Gem site comprises a very large coastal • jewelweed, turtlehead, marsh cinquefoil, blue skullcap wetland complex along the northwest shore of Green Bay and marsh bellflower. Shrub carr habitat is dominated three miles southeast of the city of Peshtigo. The wetland by slender willow; other shrub species include alder, complex extends upstream along the Peshtigo River for MARINETTE COUNTY red osier dogwood and white meadowsweet. Floodplain two miles from its mouth. This site is significant because forest habitats are dominated by silver maple and green of its size, the diversity of wetland community types ash. Wetlands of the Peshtigo River Delta support several present, and the overall good condition of the vegetation. - rare plant species including few-flowered spikerush, The complexity of the site – including abandoned oxbow variegated horsetail and northern wild raisin. lakes and a series of sloughs and lagoons within the river delta – offers excellent habitat for waterfowl. A number This Wetland Gem provides extensive, diverse and high of rare animals and plants have been documented using quality wetland habitat for many species of waterfowl, these wetlands. The area supports a variety of recreational herons, gulls, terns and shorebirds and is an important uses, such as hunting, fishing, trapping and boating. The staging, nesting and stopover site for many migratory Peshtigo River Delta has been described as the most birds. Rare and interesting bird species documented at diverse and least disturbed wetland complex on the west the site include red-shouldered hawk, black tern, yellow shore of Green Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Oklahoma Native Plant Society, Volume 2, Number 1
    54 Oklahoma Native Plant Record Volume 2, Number 1, December 2002 Schoenoplectus hallii and S. saximontanus 2000 Wichita Mountain Wildlife Refuge Survey Dr. Lawrence K. Magrath Curator-USAO (OCLA) Herbarium Chickasha, OK 73018-5358 A survey to determine locations of populations of Schoenoplectus hallii and S. saximontanus was conducted at Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge in August and September 2000. One or both species were found at 20 of the 134 locations surveyed. A distinctive terminal achene character was found specifically that the transverse ridges of S. hallii appeared to be rounded and S. saximontanus appeared to be rounded with a projecting narrow wing. Basal macroachenes have not yet been properly described but are borne singly at the base of each culm and are about 3-4 times larger than the terminal achenes. It is speculated that amphicarpy may be related to grazing pressure, the basal macroachene being produced even if the upper portion is consumed, as a response to grazing. Both species are grazed/disturbed by bison, elk, and longhorns on the Refuge. Introduction the drawdown mud, sand, or gravel flats. A survey to determine locations of However in some places they occur in shallow populations of Schoenoplectus hallii (A. Gray) water up to a depth of about a foot [30.5cm]. S.G. Smith (Hall’s bulrush) and S. saximontanus They seem to compete with perennial emergent (Fernald) J. Raynal (Rocky Mountain bulrush) plants and with most emergent annuals. was conducted on the Wichita Mountains In addition to the 36 sites that I Wildlife Refuge during late August through personally examined, WMWR staff examined September 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts
    CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Josh Pederson / SIMoN NOAA Matt Wilson/Jay Clark, NOAA NMFS AFSC NMFS Southwest Fisheries Science Center GULF OF THE FARALLONES AND CORDELL BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES Report of a Joint Working Group of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries Advisory Councils Editors John Largier, Brian Cheng, and Kelley Higgason EXECUTIVE SUMMARY June 2010 Executive Summary On global and regional scales, the ocean is changing due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and associated global climate change. Regional physical changes include sea level rise, coastal erosion and flooding, and changes in precipitation and land runoff, ocean- atmosphere circulation, and ocean water properties. These changes in turn lead to biotic responses within ocean ecosystems, including changes in physiology, phenology, and population connectivity, as well as species range shifts. Regional habitats and ecosystems are thus affected by a combination of physical processes and biological responses. While climate change will also significantly impact human populations along the coast, this is discussed only briefly. Climate Change Impacts, developed by a joint working group of the Gulf of the Farallones (GFNMS) and Cordell Bank (CBNMS) National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Councils, identifies and synthesizes potential climate change impacts to habitats and biological communities along the north-central California coast. This report does not assess current conditions, or predict future changes. It presents scientific observations and expectations to identify potential issues related to changing climate – with an emphasis on the most likely ecological impacts and the impacts that would be most severe if they occur. Climate Change Impacts provides a foundation of information and scientific insight for each sanctuary to develop strategies for addressing climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Wetland Gross Primary Production Across the Continental
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Tidal Wetland Gross Primary Production Across 10.1029/2019GB006349 the Continental United States, 2000–2019 Special Section: R. A. Feagin1 , I. Forbrich2 , T. P. Huff1, J. G. Barr3, J. Ruiz‐Plancarte4 , J. D. Fuentes4 , Carbon cycling in tidal wet- 4 5 5 6 7 R. G. Najjar , R. Vargas , A. Vázquez‐Lule , L. Windham‐Myers , K. D. Kroeger , lands and estuaries of the con- 8 1 9 8 8 2 tiguous United States E. J. Ward , G. W. Moore , M. Leclerc , K. W. Krauss , C. L. Stagg , M. Alber , S. H. Knox10 , K. V. R. Schäfer11, T. S. Bianchi12 , J. A. Hutchings13 , H. Nahrawi9,14 , 1 1 1 1,15 6 16 Key Points: A. Noormets , B. Mitra , A. Jaimes , A. L. Hinson , B. Bergamaschi , J. S. King , and 17 • We created the Blue Carbon (BC) G. Miao model, which mapped the Gross Primary Production (GPP) of all 1Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA, 2Marine Biological tidal wetlands within the Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA, USA, 3Elder Research, Charlottesville, VA, USA, 4Department of Meteorology and continental United States 5 • Atmospheric Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, The BC model provides maps of tidal 6 7 wetland GPP at sub‐250 m scales University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA, United States 8 and at 16‐day intervals for the years Geological Survey, Woods Hole, MA, USA, United States Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, 2000‐2019 Lafayette, LA, USA, 9Atmospheric Biogeosciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA, 10Department of Geography, • 2 The average daily GPP per m was University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, USA, 11Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, 4.32 ± 2.45 g C/m2/day, and the total NJ, USA, 12Departmet of Geological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 13Department of Earth and annual GPP for the continental 14 United States was 39.65 ± 0.89 Tg Planetary Sciences, Washington University, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention
    Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: the role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity edited by A. J. Hails Ramsar Convention Bureau Ministry of Environment and Forest, India 1996 [1997] Published by the Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland, with the support of: • the General Directorate of Natural Resources and Environment, Ministry of the Walloon Region, Belgium • the Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Denmark • the National Forest and Nature Agency, Ministry of the Environment and Energy, Denmark • the Ministry of Environment and Forests, India • the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Sweden Copyright © Ramsar Convention Bureau, 1997. Reproduction of this publication for educational and other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior perinission from the copyright holder, providing that full acknowledgement is given. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The views of the authors expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect those of the Ramsar Convention Bureau or of the Ministry of the Environment of India. Note: the designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Ranasar Convention Bureau concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Citation: Halls, A.J. (ed.), 1997. Wetlands, Biodiversity and the Ramsar Convention: The Role of the Convention on Wetlands in the Conservation and Wise Use of Biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Our Wonderful Wetlands Publication
    Exploring Our Wonderful Wetlands Student Publication Grades 4–7 Dear Wetland Students: Are you ready to explore our wonderful wetlands? We hope so! To help you learn about several types of wetlands in our area, we are taking you on a series of explorations. As you move through the publication, be sure to test your wetland wit and write about wetlands before moving on to the next exploration. By exploring our wonderful wetlands, we hope that you will appreciate where you live and encourage others to help protect our precious natural resources. Let’s begin our exploration now! Southwest Florida Water Management District Exploring Our Wonderful Wetlands Exploration 1 Wading Into Our Wetlands ................................................Page 3 Exploration 2 Searching Our Saltwater Wetlands .................................Page 5 Exploration 3 Finding Out About Our Freshwater Wetlands .............Page 7 Exploration 4 Discovering What Wetlands Do .................................... Page 10 Exploration 5 Becoming Protectors of Our Wetlands ........................Page 14 Wetlands Activities .............................................................Page 17 Websites ................................................................................Page 20 Visit the Southwest Florida Water Management District’s website at WaterMatters.org. Exploration 1 Wading Into Our Wetlands What exactly is a wetland? The scientific and legal definitions of wetlands differ. In 1984, when the Florida Legislature passed a Wetlands Protection Act, they decided to use a plant list containing plants usually found in wetlands. We are very fortunate to have a lot of wetlands in Florida. In fact, Florida has the third largest wetland acreage in the United States. The term wetlands includes a wide variety of aquatic habitats. Wetland ecosystems include swamps, marshes, wet meadows, bogs and fens. Essentially, wetlands are transitional areas between dry uplands and aquatic systems such as lakes, rivers or oceans.
    [Show full text]