DOCSLIB.ORG

Central Salinas Valley Area Plan Philosophy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Central Salinas Valley Area Plan Philosophy CENTRAL SALINAS VALLEY AREA PLAN A PART OF THE MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN MONTEREY COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Sam Karas, Chairman Marc Del Piero Dusan Petrovic Barbara Shipnuck Karin Strasser Kauffman MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Calvin Reaves, Chairman Thomas Mill, 1st Vice Chairman Lynn Riddle, 2nd Vice Chairwoman Peter Cailotto Louis Calcagno Tom Glau David Hendrick Manuel Jimenez Jo Stallard GREATER SALINAS AREA PLAN CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Hans Sappok, Chairman Michael Boggiatto Ellyse Burke Donald Cranford Hardy Nielsen William Pennycook Kevin Quinn Bruno Sala The Committee dedicates this report to the memory of fellow CAC member Jack Coakley MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Robert Slimmon, Jr., Director of Planing Raymond W. Lamb, Assistant Director of Planning Project Staff: Frank E. Brunings, Project Planner Steve Early, Graphics Supervisor Steven Sigala, Project Graphics Carmelia Moon, Word Processing Approved by the Monterey County Planning Commission January 9, 1985. 1 Adopted by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors October 14, 1986. CENTRAL SALINAS VALLEY AREA PLAN PHILOSOPHY The Central Salinas Valley Area Plan was prepared under the guidance of the Central Salinas Valley Citizens' Advisory Committee (CAC), appointed by the Board of Supervisors on December 6, 1983. The thirteen member CAC represents a cross section of individuals in an area with a long tradition of working with the land. The process of developing this area plan provided a high degree of citizen involvement allowing many residents the opportunity to help shape future development. The Central Salinas Valley Area Plan reflects the values and desires of many local residents sharing common concerns for the Central Salinas Valley and Monterey County as a whole. The ideological foundation of the Central Salinas Valley Area Plan is preservation of the area's agricultural vitality and rural character. Accommodating growth within this context will maintain the economic stability and quality of life for present and future residents of Central Salinas Valley. Expansive agricultural areas, open spaces, scenic hillsides, clean air and water are among the resource attributes from which Central Salinas Valley derives its special sense of place. Protection of these resources will reinforce County efforts to conserve agricultural lands and the Planning Area's agricultural economy. The County's population will continue to grow. The rural lifestyle, relatively low cost of land, and job opportunities in the agricultural and service industries will attract families to settle in Central Salinas Valley. The Plan attempts to accommodate these often inconsistent land uses by directing growth to areas where development will have the least impact on agricultural activities. The majority of growth in the Planning Area is expected to occur within the jurisdiction of the valley cities. Specific areas are designated on the land use plan which are reserved for future expansion and growth of the cities through the annexation process. In the unincorporated area, the Plan directs growth away from remote areas and towards areas where some development has already occurred and where public services and facilities are available. The Plan provides for residential development within the unincorporated area in sufficient quantity to accommodate the housing needs of present and future County residents. The Plan also provides areas for the expansion of industries currently experiencing growth and providing jobs. Growth within the Planning Area must be accomplished within the limits of the Area's natural and constructed constraints. Fire hazards, seismic and geologic hazards, transportation system capacity, water and sewage system capacity, and environmentally sensitive areas are some of the constraints which must be evaluated before development may be authorized as shown on the land use plan. The Plan, therefore, attempts to accommodate the growth and maintenance of existing and 3 UPDATE INDEX CENTRAL SALINAS VALLEY AREA PLAN - AMENDMENTS As Adopted by the Monterey County Board of Supervisors for the following date(s): 1. August 30, 1988 - MAP CHANGE - APN 235-071-16 - Change Land Use Designation from "Farmlands, 40 Acre Minimum" to "Commercial". 2. December 12, 1989 - MAP CHANGE - APN 145-052-03, 04 - Change Land Use Designation from "High Density Residential, 10 Units/Acre" to "HDR 12 Units/Acre" 12 units or 17.5 units. 3. December 12, 1989 - MAP CHANGE - APN 418-401-23 - Change Land Use Designation from "Farmlands, 40 Acre Minimum" to "Industrial". 4. December 11, 1990 - MAP CHANGE - APN 257-031-02 - Change Land Use Designation from "Industrial" to "Farmlands, 40 Acre Mininum". 5. December 15, 1992 - MAP CHANGE - APN(s) 257-121-006; 007; 009; 011; 013; 015-023 - Change Designation for 78 acres southeast of Soledad on Metz Road from "Farmlands, 40 Acre Minimum" to "Low Density Residential, 2.5 Acres/Unit". 6. August 24, 1993 - MAP CHANGE - APN 020-021-11 - Change Land Use Designation from "Farmlands, 40 Acre Minimum" to "Industrial", Board Resolution 93-338. 7. August 24, 1993 - MAP CHANGE - APN 420-063-033-000M - Change Land Use Designation from "Permanent Grazing, 40 Acre Minimum" to "Rural Grazing, 40 Acre Minimum", Board Resolution 93-339. 8. December 14, 1993 - CHANGE LAND USE DESIGNATION - APN 137-051-028 - Change Land Use Designation from "Farmlands, 40 Acre Minimum" to "Industrial" for a 11.9 acre parcel located in the Potter Road area south of Salinas. 9. June 14, 1994 - MAP CHANGE - 145-021-001 - Change Land Use Designation from “Farmlands, 40 Acre Minimum” to “Industrial” for a 2.5 acre parcel immediately west of Chualar. 10. December 5, 1995 - MAP CHANGE - APNs 420-051-011-000; 420-051-012-000; 420-051-013- 000; 420-051-014-000 - Change land use designation from “Public/Quasi-Public” to “Resource Conservation, 40 Acre Minimum.” 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CENTRAL SALINAS VALLEY AREA PLAN PHILOSOPY .................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................6 PART I: INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS CHAPTER I: NATURAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................8 Geography and Climate ....................................................................................................9 Geology..............................................................................................................................9 Mineral Resources..............................................................................................................10 Soils and Slope ...................................................................................................................10 Farmlands..........................................................................................................................12 Water Resources.................................................................................................................12 Vegetation..........................................................................................................................17 Wildlife...............................................................................................................................18 Environmentally Sensitive Areas .......................................................................................19 Archaeological Resources ..................................................................................................19 Historic Sites ......................................................................................................................19 Scenic Resources ................................................................................................................20 CHAPTER II: ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS.............................................................24 Seismic and Geologic Hazards...........................................................................................25 Flood Hazards....................................................................................................................27 Fire Hazards.......................................................................................................................28 Miscellaneous Hazards.......................................................................................................29 Emergency Preparedness...................................................................................................31 Air Quality..........................................................................................................................33 Water Quality.....................................................................................................................33 Noise Hazards ....................................................................................................................38 CHAPTER III: HUMAN RESOURCES....................................................................................40 Demographic Analysis........................................................................................................41 Population Trends..................................................................................................42 Population Characteristics ....................................................................................42 Population Forecasts.............................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area
    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 110/Thursday, June 8, 2006/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 110 / Thursday, June 8, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 33239 request for an extension beyond the Background Background on Viticultural Areas maximum duration of the initial 12- The final regulations (TD 9254) that TTB Authority month program must be submitted are the subject of this correction are electronically in the Department of under section 1502 of the Internal Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Homeland Security’s Student and Revenue Code. Administration Act (the FAA Act, 27 Exchange Visitor Information System U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol (SEVIS). Supporting documentation Need for Correction beverage labels provide consumers with must be submitted to the Department on As published, final regulations (TD adequate information regarding product the sponsor’s organizational letterhead 9254) contains an error that may prove identity and prohibits the use of and contain the following information: to be misleading and is in need of misleading information on such labels. (1) Au pair’s name, SEVIS clarification. The FAA Act also authorizes the identification number, date of birth, the Secretary of the Treasury to issue length of the extension period being Correction of Publication regulations to carry out its provisions. requested; Accordingly, the final regulations (TD The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and (2) Verification that the au pair 9254) which was the subject of FR Doc. Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these completed the educational requirements 06–2411, is corrected as follows: regulations. of the initial program; and On page 13009, column 2, in the Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR (3) Payment of the required non- preamble, under the paragraph heading part 4) allows the establishment of refundable fee (see 22 CFR 62.90) via ‘‘Special Analyses’’, line 4 from the definitive viticultural areas and the use Pay.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Watsonville Historic Context Statement (2007)
    Historic Context Statement for the City of Watsonville FINAL REPORT Watsonville, California April 2007 Prepared by One Sutter Street Suite 910 San Francisco CA 94104 415.362.7711 ph 415.391.9647 fx Acknowledgements The Historic Context Statement for the City of Watsonville would not have been possible without the coordinated efforts of the City of Watsonville Associate Planner Suzi Aratin, and local historians and volunteers Ann Jenkins and Jane Borg whose vast knowledge and appreciation of Watsonville is paramount. Their work was tireless and dependable, and their company more than pleasant. In addition to hours of research, fact checking and editing their joint effort has become a model for other communities developing a historic context statement. We would like to thank the City of Watsonville Council members and Planning Commission members for supporting the Historic Context Statement project. It is a testimony to their appreciation and protection of local history. Thanks to all of you. Table of Contents Chapter Page 1.0 Background and Objectives 1 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Location and Boundaries of Study 1.3 Context Statement Objective 2.0 Methodology 5 2.1 Context Statement Methodology 2.2 Summary of Resources 3.0 Introduction to Historic Contexts 7 3.1 Summary of Historic Contexts 3.2 Summary of Regional History Before Incorporation 3.3 Summary of regional history from 1868 – 1960 4.0 Historic Context 1 - Municipal Development 17 4.1 Overview 4.2 History 4.2.1 Schools 4.2.2 Civic Institutions 4.2.3 Infrastructure: Water 4.2.4 Infrastructure:
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Monterey County
    Old Fisherman’s Wharf Post Ranch Inn, Big Sur Monterey County boasts 99 miles of coastline and 3,771 square miles of magnificence that begs for exploration. From submarine depths to elevations of over 5,500 feet, Monterey County invites you to grab life by the moments and discover an unlimited array Explore of things to see and do. Plan your next trip and explore more with Monterey our interactive map at SeeMonterey.com. County White-sand beach at Carmel-by-the-Sea Paragliding at Marina State Beach DESTINATION GUIDE AND MAP Carmel-by-the-Sea Monterey Big Sur Marina UNFORGETTABLE CHARM BOUNTY ON THE BAY SCENERY BEYOND COMPARE ADVENTURE ON LAND, SEA & AIR The perfect itinerary of California’s Central Coast isn’t Monterey’s never-ending activities and various attractions will With its breathtaking beauty and unparalleled scenery, Big Sur Marina is wonderfully diverse, teeming with options for food, complete without a visit to picturesque Carmel-by-the-Sea. keep you busy from the moment you wake until you rest your beckons for you to explore. Rocky cliffs, lush mountains, coastal culture, and adventure. On top of the bay, its scenic trails and This quaint town is a delightful fusion of art galleries, boutiques, head at night. Its robust and remarkable history has attracted redwood forests, and hidden beaches combine to create an epic seascapes afford endless possibilities for fun and exploration, charming hotels, a white-sand beach, diverse restaurants, and visitors since the 1700s. Today, the abundance of restaurants, backdrop for recreation, romance, and relaxed exploration. attracting bicyclists, hang gliders, paragliders, kite enthusiasts, whimsically styled architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin, Forebay Aquifer Subbasin • Groundwater Basin Number: 3-4.04 • County: Monterey • Surface Area: 94,000 Acres (147 Square Miles)
    Central Coast Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin, Forebay Aquifer Subbasin • Groundwater Basin Number: 3-4.04 • County: Monterey • Surface Area: 94,000 acres (147 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology The Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin – Forebay Aquifer Subbasin occupies the central portion of the Salinas Valley and extends from the town of Gonzales in the north to approximately three miles south of Greenfield. The subbasin is bounded to the west by the contact of Quaternary terrace deposits of the subbasin with Mesozoic metamorphic rocks (Sur Series) or middle Miocene marine sedimentary rocks (Monterey Shale) of the Sierra de Salinas. To the east, the boundary is the contact of Quaternary terrace deposits or alluvium with granitic rocks of the Gabilan Range. The northern subbasin boundary is shared with the Salinas Valley –180/400-Foot Aquifer and –Eastside Aquifer and represents the southern limit of confining conditions in the 180/400-Foot Aquifer Subbasin. The southern boundary is shared with the Salinas Valley – Upper Valley Aquifer Subbasin and generally represents the southern limit of confining conditions above the 400-Foot Aquifer (MW 1994). This boundary also represents a constriction of the Valley floor caused by encroachment from the west by the composite alluvial fan of Arroyo Seco and Monroe Creek. Intermittent streams such as Stonewall and Chalone Creeks drain the western slopes of the Gabilan Range and flow westward across the subbasin toward the Salinas River. The major tributary drainage to the Salinas River in the Salinas Valley is Arroyo Seco, which drains a large portion of the Sierra de Salinas west of Greenfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Pancho Rico Formation Salinas Valley, California
    Pancho Rico Formation Salinas Valley, California G E 0 L 0 G I CAL SURVEY P R 0 FE S S I 0 N A L PAPER 524-A Pancho Rico Formation Salinas Valley, California By DAVID L. DURHAM and WARREN 0. ADDICOTT SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 524-A A study of stratigraphy and paleontology of Pliocene marine strata in southern Salinas Vallry, California UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY PANCHO RICO FORMATION, SALINAS VALLEY, CALIFORNIA By DAVID L. DuRHAM and WARREN 0. AnniCOTT ABSTRACT northwestern part of the area are of a northern, cool-water type and may indicate interchange with Pliocene faunas to the north The Pancho Rico Formation of Pliocene age comprises sandy through a northwest-trending marine trough. marine strata and interbedded finer grainr.d rocks. It generally overlies the marine Monterey Shale of Miocene age and under­ INTRODUCTION lies the nonmarine Paso Robles Formation of Pliocene and fleistocene( ?) age in southern Monterey County, Calif. Lo­ Sandy marine strata succeed mudstone, porcelanite, ~ally it lies on the basement complex or on the Santa Mar­ and chert beds of the Monterey Shale at most places in galita Formation of upper Miocene age. It crops otrt from north the Salinas Valley, southern Monterey County, Calif. of King City southeastward for more than 50 miles to beyond the Nacimiento River and Vineyard Canyon. The Pancho Rico These sandy strata, together with interspersed finer contains sandstone, mudstone, porcelaneous mudstone, por­ grained rocks, constitute the Paneho Rico Formation celanite, diatomaceous mudstone, and conglomerate.
    [Show full text]
  • Salinas Valley Irrigation and Nutrient Management Program (Inmp)
    SALINAS VALLEY IRRIGATION AND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (INMP) 12-414-553 FINAL PROJECT REPORT Final Report California’s Proposition 84 Agricultural Water Quality Grant Program Agreement No. 12-414-553 Total Grant Funds: $1,250,000 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was made possible and the outcome successful by the combined effort and contributions of many individuals and organizations. Successful implementation was achieved through the coordinated dedicated work of project partners (CCR, CCWG, RCDMC, MBNMS, UCCE), the project manager & administrators from CCRWQCB, land owners where assessment were conducted and projects implemented (Ag Land Trust, DOLE, P,G&E, Oceanmist Farm, and USDA Research Station), permitting agencies (Monterey County and SWRCB) and the engineers and contractors who made it happen on the ground. The following individuals played important roles in the inspiration, planning, management and implementation Salinas Valley Irrigation and Nutrient Management Program Project Partners: Coastal Conservation and Research, Inc.: Jim Oakden Central Coast Wetlands Group: Ross Clark, Sierra Ryan, Jason Adelaars, Kevin O’Connor UC Cooperative Extension: Michael Cahn, Laura Murphy, Tom Lockhart MBNMS: Bridget Hoover, Pam Krone RCDMC: Paul Robins, Ben Burgoa Grant Management CCRWQCB: Katie McNeill, Stacy Denney, Karen Worcester Ocean Mist Bioreactor: Sea Mist Farms: Dale Huss Pajaro Valley Laser Leveling: Bob and Chris Peixoto CC&R Restoration Crew:Jane Echenique, Sarah Jeffries, Dorota Szuta, Niko Oliver MLML Volunteers:
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement for Agricultural Resources in the North County Planning Area, Monterey County
    Historic Context Statement for Agricultural Resources in the North County Planning Area, Monterey County The Aromas Pig Club Prepared By: Prepared For: PAST Consultants, LLC Monterey County Parks Dept. P.O. Box 283 855 E. Laurel Drive, Building G Petaluma CA 94953 Salinas CA 93905 September 2010 HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT: AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES IN THE NORTH COUNTY PLANNING AREA MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Certified Local Government Grant: 2009 – 2010 Date of Publication: September 2010 Prepared For: Prepared By: Meg Clovis, Cultural Affairs Manager PAST Consultants, LLC Monterey County Parks Department P.O. Box 283 P.O. Box 5249 Petaluma, CA 94953 Salinas, CA 93915 The activity which is the subject of this Historic Context Statement has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, through the California Office of Historic Preservation. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation, nor does mention of trade names of commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the California Office of Historic Preservation. *************************************************************************** Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color, sex, age, disability, or national origin. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Essay
    Convergence A story of people, place and opportunity at Carr Lake by Peter Forbes Cover painting by JC Gonzalez Convergence A story of people, place and opportunity at Carr Lake by Peter Forbes August, 2018 Photo by DMT Imaging, Michael Troutman con•ver•gence kәn'vәrjәns/ noun • the tendency of unrelated animals to evolve similarly. • the merging of distinct technologies, industries, or devices into a unifed whole. • progress towards equity. • the act of moving toward union. “When I have a stranger in my ofce, they almost always walk over and stare at that map on my wall and point at that big blank spot in the middle of our city and ask, “What the heck is that place? I tell them: that’s Carr Lake.” -Gary Petersen, former Salinas Public Works Director Chapter 1 Headline Here Text here “The only thing I can commit to is being alongside Big Sur Land Trust until the end. We’ll stay together and do our best. We might win less or win more, but the relationship is what matters most. The relationship is as important to us as the land. Count on me and I’ll count on you.” -Sabino Lopez, Acting Director, Center for Community Advocacy “Big Sur Land Trust has this opportunity to do something uniquely diferent. They have the opportunity to capture history and to help us make some- thing really beautiful for our community. I say this to them, ‘Don’t be afraid. If you stand by us, we will stand by you.’ ” -Juan Carlos Gonzalez, Director, Urban Arts Collaborative vii Photo by Peter Forbes Convergence Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Quality in the Monterey Bay and Salinas Valley Groundwater Basins, California
    U.S. Geological Survey and the California State Water Resources Control Board Groundwater Quality in the Monterey Bay and Salinas Valley Groundwater Basins, California Groundwater provides more than 40 percent of California’s drinking water. To protect this vital resource, the State of California created the Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment (GAMA) Program. The Priority Basin Project of the GAMA Program provides a comprehensive assessment of the State’s groundwater quality and increases public access to groundwater-quality information. The basins around Monterey Bay, and in the Salinas and Paso Robles Valleys, constitute one of the study units being evaluated. The Monterey-Salinas Study Unit Overview of Water Quality The Monterey-Salinas study unit is nearly 1,000 square miles and consists of the Santa Cruz Purisima Formation Highlands, Felton Area, Scotts Valley, Soquel Valley, West Santa Inorganic Organic constituents constituents Cruz Terrace, Salinas Valley, Pajaro Valley, and Carmel Valley groundwater basins (California Department of Water Resources, 2003; Kulongski and Belitz, 2011). These basins were grouped 15 <1 into four study areas based primarily on geography. Groundwater basins in the north were 7 grouped into the Santa Cruz study area, and those to the south were grouped into the Monterey 49 36 Bay, the Salinas Valley, and the Paso Robles study areas (Kulongoski and others, 2007). 93 The study unit has warm, dry summers and cool, moist winters. Average annual rainfall ranges from 31 inches in Santa Cruz in the north to 13 inches in Paso Robles in the south. The study areas are drained by several rivers and their principal tributaries: the Salinas, Pajaro, and CONSTITUENT CONCENTRATIONS Carmel Rivers, and San Lorenzo Creek.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Destruction in the Salinas Valley: “Food Safety” Requirements to Remove Habitat Make Leafy Greens Less Safe
    Environmental Destruction in the Salinas Valley: “Food Safety” Requirements to Remove Habitat Make Leafy Greens Less Safe California’s Salinas Valley not only holds the distinction as the nation’s salad bowl, but also as being in the heart of the leafy green food safety crisis. While head lettuce has been grown commercially in this area for over a hundred years, baby lettuce and other processed greens have come to occupy a significant portion of the acreage in the last 20 years. With these changes, consumers have experienced an increase in the number of food safety illnesses–culmi- nating in the fall of 2006 with alarming front page head- lines publicizing E. coli 0157–contaminated spinach. Huge farm and shipping losses ensued. Rather than focusing on the problems inherent to bagging fresh leafy greens–or on cattle, which are the major source of E. coli 0157 on Shippers and buyers are unreason- the landscape–buyers and shippers are targeting wildlife ably pressuring farmers to remove and their habitat as culprits. However, wildlife have not wildlife habitat such as these mature been proven to be significant vectors ofE. coli 0157. The trees that were growing adjacent to unfortunate and unscientific reaction has resulted in farm- fields along the Salinas River. Wildlife ers being required to undertake draconian measures which only makes food less safe. Scientists have known for years have not been found to be significant that non-crop vegetation can effectively filter water- and vectors of E. coli 0157. dust-borne pathogens. Moreover, U.C. Davis researchers have shown that just a few meters of grass can filterE.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Study
    LAFCO of Monterey County _ LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF MONTEREY COUNTY 2018 Municipal Service Review and Sphere of Influence Study: Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System Adopted by the Commission on March 26, 2018 COMMISSIONERS Chair Simón Salinas, County Member Vice Chair Warren E. Poitras, Special District Member Luis Alejo, County Member, Alternate Sherwood Darington, Public Member Matt Gourley, Public Member, Alternate Joe Gunter, City Member Maria Orozco, City Member, Alternate Jane Parker, County Member Ralph Rubio, City Member Graig R. Stephens, Special District Member Vacant, Special District Member, Alternate STAFF Kate McKenna, AICP, Executive Officer Darren McBain, Senior Analyst Joe A. Serrano, Senior Analyst Gail Lawrence, Clerk to the Commission Tiffany Hutchison, Administrative Assistant Leslie J. Girard, General Counsel LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF MONTEREY COUNTY 132 W. Gabilan Street, Suite 102, Salinas, CA 93901 P.O. Box 1369, Salinas, CA 93902 (831)754-5838 www.monterey.lafco.ca.gov LAFCO of Monterey County 2 Table of Contents District at a Glance ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Report Overview and Organization ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]