DOCSLIB.ORG

Proposal for Namibia (4)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AFB/PPRC.17/17 25 September 2015 Adaptation Fund Board Project and Programme Review Committee Seventeenth Meeting Bonn, Germany, 6-7 October 2015 Agenda Item 6 l) PROPOSAL FOR NAMIBIA (4) AFB/PPRC.17/17 Background 1. The Operational Policies and Guidelines (OPG) for Parties to Access Resources from the Adaptation Fund (the Fund), adopted by the Adaptation Fund Board (the Board), state in paragraph 45 that regular adaptation project and programme proposals, i.e. those that request funding exceeding US$ 1 million, would undergo either a one-step, or a two-step approval process. In case of the one-step process, the proponent would directly submit a fully-developed project proposal. In the two-step process, the proponent would first submit a brief project concept, which would be reviewed by the Project and Programme Review Committee (PPRC) and would have to receive the endorsement of the Board. In the second step, the fully- developed project/programme document would be reviewed by the PPRC, and would ultimately require the Board’s approval. 2. The Templates approved by the Board (OPG, Annex 4) do not include a separate template for project and programme concepts but provide that these are to be submitted using the project and programme proposal template. The section on Adaptation Fund Project Review Criteria states: For regular projects using the two-step approval process, only the first four criteria will be applied when reviewing the 1st step for regular project concept. In addition, the information provided in the 1st step approval process with respect to the review criteria for the regular project concept could be less detailed than the information in the request for approval template submitted at the 2nd step approval process. Furthermore, a final project document is required for regular projects for the 2nd step approval, in addition to the approval template. 3. The first four criteria mentioned above are: 1. Country Eligibility, 2. Project Eligibility, 3. Resource Availability, and 4. Eligibility of NIE/MIE. 4. The fifth criterion, applied when reviewing a fully-developed project document, is: 5. Implementation Arrangements. 5. It is worth noting that since the twenty-second Board meeting, the Environmental and Social (E&S) Policy of the Fund was approved and consequently compliance with the Policy has been included in the review criteria both for concept documents and fully-developed project documents. The proposals template was revised as well, to include sections requesting demonstration of compliance of the project/programme with the E&S Policy. 6. In its seventeenth meeting, the Board decided (Decision B.17/7) to approve “Instructions for preparing a request for project or programme funding from the Adaptation Fund”, contained in the Annex to document AFB/PPRC.8/4, which further outlines applicable review criteria for both concepts and fully-developed proposals. The latest version of this document was launched in conjunction with the revision of the Operational Policies and Guidelines in November 2013. 7. Based on the Board Decision B.9/2, the first call for project and programme proposals was issued and an invitation letter to eligible Parties to submit project and programme proposals to the Fund was sent out on April 8, 2010. 1 AFB/PPRC.17/17 8. According to the Board Decision B.12/10, a project or programme proposal needs to be received by the secretariat no less than nine weeks before a Board meeting, in order to be considered by the Board in that meeting. 9. The following fully-developed project document titled “Integrating climate smart land management options in Namibia: to enhance long term productivity, profitability and resilience” was submitted by the Desert research Foundation of Namibia (DRFN), which is the National Implementing Entity of the Adaptation Fund for Namibia. 10. This is the first submission of the proposal. It was received by the secretariat in time to be considered in the twenty-sixth Board meeting. The secretariat carried out a technical review of the project proposal, assigned it the diary number NAM/NIE/Rural/2015/1, and completed a review sheet. 11. In accordance with a request to the secretariat made by the Board in its 10th meeting, the secretariat shared this review sheet with DRFN, and offered it the opportunity of providing responses before the review sheet was sent to the PPRC. 12. The secretariat is submitting to the PPRC the summary and, pursuant to decision B.17/15, the final technical review of the project, both prepared by the secretariat, along with the final submission of the proposal in the following section. In accordance with decision B.25.15, the proposal is submitted with changes between the initial submission and the revised version highlighted. 2 AFB/PPRC.17/17 Project Summary Namibia – Integrating climate smart land management options in Namibia: to enhance long term productivity, profitability and resilience Implementing Entity: DRFN Project/Programme Execution Cost: USD 525,346 Total Project/Programme Cost: USD 5,529,954 Implementing Fee: USD 470,046 Financing Requested: USD 6,000,000 Project Background and Context: Despite several successes in the field of natural resources management, conservation programs implemented in Namibia have focused primarily on wildlife, tourism and sustainable utilization of resources, leaving aside the agricultural sector. Nevertheless, the majority of conservancy members practice and depend on agriculture (mostly at subsistence level), based on communal resources. This multi-sectoral initiative will build upon the work done by various stakeholders over the past years in the field of land tenure in Namibia, notably by the Ministry of Land Reform and its Integrated Regional Land Use plans. The project will create a national platform to coordinate national efforts in land tenure and implement them at different local levels. The project will take place in 12 selected sites, spread across the country. Component 1: Integrated land management planning at local level (USD 736,680) The goal of this component will be to achieve sustainable land use through participatory land use planning. Efforts will be made to inform targeted communities on the nexus between climate change and land use, and their respective impacts on communities’ livelihoods, in order to support the implementation of a coherent land use vision in the targeted region in a participatory way. To support these activities, maps of current land use and trends will be produced. Ultimately, land use plans will be developed by communities, along with an actionable roadmap for the implementation of such plans in the targeted areas. Component 2: Governance and Institutional structure (USD 250,230) The project will seek to strengthen the competences of local institutions in the target areas, in implementing the local climate-smart plans prepared in a participatory manner under component 1. The activities will consist in identifying suitable community structures at local level, recognizing their potential gaps, and reinforcing them accordingly. Component 3: Implementation of climate smart local level plans (USD 3,016,776) This component will build upon component 1 and 2 to achieve the implementation of integrated and climate-smart land use plans in cooperation with local governing bodies. The project will implement practical technologies that could include rangeland management and cultivated pastures, conservation agriculture, livestock production, forest and woodland management, indigenous natural products, wildlife utilization, fire management, tourism, fisheries, small-scale horticulture and small animal production, marketing, among others. Component 4: Learning and knowledge management (USD 500,461) 3 AFB/PPRC.17/17 The project will document and share new knowledge, as it is developed, with relevant stakeholders such as land users, farmers, decision-makers, among others, in order to replicate best practices in other areas. Component 5: Research and Development (USD 500,461) The project will foster research and development of new technologies that could be tested and applied to local contexts. Precise needs will be identified under Component 1, but potential outputs include the development of research studies related to local fodder crops, rehabilitation of degraded rangelands, desertification of arid areas, economic viability of current forestry strategies, or woodland reforestation, among others. 4 AFB/PPRC.17/17 ADAPTATION FUND BOARD SECRETARIAT TECHNICAL REVIEW OF PROJECT/PROGRAMME PROPOSAL PROJECT/PROGRAMME CATEGORY: Regular-sized Project _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Country/Region: Namibia Project Title: Integrating climate smart land management options in Namibia: to enhance long term productivity, profitability and resilience AF Project ID: NAM/NIE/Rural/2015/1 IE Project ID: Requested Financing from Adaptation Fund (US Dollars): $6,000,000 Reviewer and contact person: Hugo Remaury Co-reviewer(s): Shyla Raghav, Andrew Chilombo IE Contact Person: Dr. Martin Schneider Review Questions Comments on 21/8/15 Comments on 10/9/2015 Criteria 1. Is the country party to the Yes Kyoto Protocol? Yes, Namibia is cited as the most arid Country 2. Is the country a developing country in sub-Saharan Africa and is Eligibility country particularly vulnerable to the adverse projected to have an increase in aridity effects of climate change? and an intensification of climate variability. 1. Has the designated Yes
Recommended publications
  • Final Report #8 Stakeholder Feedback on CBNRM Policies Report 31 March 2010

    Final Report #8 Stakeholder Feedback on CBNRM Policies Report 31 March 2010

    Conservancy Needs Assessment Final Report #8 Stakeholder Feedback on CBNRM Policies Report 31 March 2010 commissioned by the Millennium Challenge Account Namibia with funding from the Millennium Challenge Corporation Prepared for the Millennium Challenge Account Namibia, MCA Contract Number MCAN/CIF/RFP P2.3.1 , Assessment of Conservancy Needs ARD Principal Contacts: Edwin Harvey Brenda Bergman Project Manager Project Director ARD, Inc. ARD, Inc. Burlington, Vermont Burlington, Vermont Tel.: 802-658-3890 Tel.: 802-658-3890 [email protected] [email protected] Cover Photos: CNA Assessment Team, 2009, ARD, Inc. Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction and Methodology ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Methodology ........................................................................................................... 1 2 Summary of Stakeholder Feedback ................................................................ 3 2.1 Conservancy Policy and Legislation ................................................................. 3 2.2 Land and Resource Tenure; Land Boards/Leases ........................................ 6 2.3 Tourism and JV issues,
  • Human Wildlife Conflict Study Namibian Case Study

    Human Wildlife Conflict Study Namibian Case Study

    Human Wildlife Conflict Study Namibian Case Study Brian T. B. Jones1 with economic analysis by Jonathan I. Barnes2 2006 1 Independent Environment and Development Consultant. E-mail: [email protected] Tel. and Fax: +264 61 237101. 2 Design and Development Services. E-mail: < [email protected] >. Tel: +264(0)61 w 226231, h 234887. Fax: +264(0)61 w 227618. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of people have contributed information and ideas that have helped shaped this report. In particular we would like to thank Bernadus “Bob” Guibeb, manager of the #Khoadi //hoas Conservancy for spending time in the field with Brian Jones and sharing his experiences of addressing human-elephant conflict in the conservancy. Further, Philip Stander of the Kunene Lion Project, Anton Esterhuizen of Integrated Rural Development and Nature Conservation and Richard Diggle of the WWF/LIFE Project provided invaluable insights on a number of HWC issues. The WWF office in Windhoek assisted with the technical production of this report. This concept design and strategic direction for the study were provided by Wendy Elliott and Amanda Nickson of the WWF Global Species Programme, Dawn Montanye, WWF Macroeconomics Programme Office, and Reimund Kube, WWF Macroeconomics Programme Office. Cover picture by Hertha Nakathingo of an elephant drinking at a water point close to a settlement in Kunene Region, Namibia; photo on this page, elephant damaged water installation in the Nyae Nyae Conservancy by Chris Weaver . 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page List of Acronyms 5 Executive Summary 6 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Human Wildlife Conflict – Why is it important? 10 1.2 Background 10 1.3 Methodology and Format 11 2.
  • An Analysis of International Law,National Legislation

    An Analysis of International Law,National Legislation

    AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, NATIONAL LEGISLATION, JUDGEMENTS, AND INSTITUTIONS AS THEY INTERRELATE WITH TERRITORIES AND AREAS CONSERVED BY INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES REPORT NO. 2 AFRICA REGIONAL “Land is the foundation of the lives and cultures of Indigenous peoples all over the world… Without access to and respect for their rights over their lands, territories and natural resources, the survival of Indigenous peoples’ particular distinct cultures is threatened.” Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues Report on the Sixth Session 25 May 2007 Authored by: Fred Nelson1, based on the reports by Brian T. B. Jones (Namibia), Fred Nelson (Kenya), and Ndiawar Dieng and Soulèye Ndiaye (Senegal) Published by: Natural Justice in Bangalore and Kalpavriksh in Pune and Delhi Date: September 2012 Cover Photo (clockwise, from left): Khwe community representatives from Namibia and Botswana participate in a workshop in the Bwabwata National Park, Namibia. © Natural Justice Artisanal fishing, Shimoni. © Richard Lamprey/Fauna & Flora International A centuries-old shell mound at Petit Kasse, Casamance, Senegal. © Christian Chatelain 1 Fred Nelson is Executive Director of Maliasili Initiatives, a US-based non-profit organization that supports natural resource conservation, sustainable development and social justice in Africa by working with leading local organizations to build their capacity and foster wider collaborative initiatives. He has lived and worked in Tanzania for a total of 11 years and is now based in Vermont, USA. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 1. ICCAS IN AFRICA: AN OVERVIEW 6 1.1 CASE STUDY COUNTRIES: KENYA, NAMIBIA, SENEGAL 7 2. LEGAL RECOGNITION AND GOVERNANCE OF ICCAS 14 2.1 LAND, NATURAL RESOURCES, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT LAW 14 2.2 FRESHWATER AND MARINE LAWS AND GOVERNANCE 18 2.3 PROTECTED AREAS, ICCAS AND SNSS 20 2.4 HUMAN RIGHTS 23 2.5 JUDGMENTS 24 3.
  • Comm Unity-Based Gonservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity

    Comm Unity-Based Gonservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity

    Comm unity-Based Gonservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity By Arthur Hoole A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies ln Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Natural Resources lnstitute University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba March, 2008 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ***** COPYRIGHT PERMISSION Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity By Arthur Hoole A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (c) 2008 Permission has been granted to the Library of the University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilms lnc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. This reproduction or copy of this thesis has been made available by authority of the copyright owner solely for the purpose of private study and research, and may only be reproduced and copied as permitted by copyright laws or with express written authorization from the copyright owner. To the memory of my parents, and for Leslie ABSTRACT This study investigates the premise that national park designations and management in Southern Africa decoupled indigenous communities from their local ecosystems. The research explores ways and means to recouple communities and national parks to promote biodiversity. The relationships are characterized between Namibia's community-based resource management program (CBNRM), conservancies, and protected areas system, with particular reference to the Ehi-rovipuka Conservancy and Etosha National Park in northern Namibia.
  • Delivering Transformative Impacts on the Ground

    Delivering Transformative Impacts on the Ground

    Ministry of Environment and Tourism Delivering transformative impacts on the ground Contribution of projects mobilized through the Ministry of Environment and Tourism from 2014-2019 1 2 MESSAGE FROM THE MINISTER 4 ABOUT THIS REPORT 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. LEVERAGING MAJOR ENVIRONMENT-RELATED FINANCING WINDOWS 7 3. OVERVIEW OF FUNDS MOBILISED 9 4. DELIVERING TRANSFORMATIVE IMPACTS 10 4.1 CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE UTILIZATION OF WILDLIFE 11 Intensifying the fight against poaching and wildlife crime 11 Supporting communities to mitigate human wildlife conflict 13 Enhancing infrastructure in national parks 13 Improving management effectiveness of national parks 13 4.2 CLIMATE RESILIENT AGRICULTURE 13 Establishment of a Centre of Excellence for climate resilient agriculture 13 Testing conservation agriculture technologies 14 Strengthening the adaptive capacity of communal farmers to climate change 14 Insuring communal farmers against drought in northeastern Namibia 14 Piloting hydroponic fodder production 15 Micro-Drip Irrigation (MDI) Gardens for vegetable production with climate smart technologies specifically for water-saving purposes 15 Use of Earth Dams and Traditional Wells 17 4.3 ENHANCING WATER SECURITY DURING THE TIME OF DROUGHT 17 Desalination Plants in the //Kharas Region 17 Taking urgent action to mitigate the drought in Ohangwena Region 18 Conservancies in Kunene Region 20 Uukwaluudhi Conservancy in Omusati Region 21 4.4 USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY TO POWER INFRASTRUCTURE IN COMMUNAL CONSERVANCIES 22 4.5 BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF
  • Africat Foundation Annual Report

    Africat Foundation Annual Report

    AfriCat Foundation Annual Report 1 March 2016 – 28 Feb 2018 1 CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 History – The Formation of AfriCat 4 What We Do Now 6 AfriCat’s Mission 6 Who and Where We Are 7 AfriCat and Okonjima – A Symbiosis at Work 22 II. 2012-2014 Annual Report 23 Programme 1: Research 23 Programme 1 - Project 1: Hobatere Lion Research Project 26 Programme 1 - Project 3: Research in the 20,000 hectare (200 km2) Okonjima Nature 39 Reserve Programme 1 - Project 4: Research in the AfriCat Carnivore Care Centre 49 Programme 2: Carnivore Care 61 Programme 3: Environmental Education 65 Programme 4: Rehabilitation, the Okonjima Nature Reserve, and Rescue and Release 69 Programme 5: Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation and Community Support 74 III. Budget and Statistics 83 2 I: Introduction Problem Statement – Why We Do What We Do Namibia is home to approximately 25% of the world’s cheetah population, of which 90% live on farmland. Namibia’s other large carnivores, namely leopards, lions, Wild Dogs, brown and spotted hyenas, are not, however, believed to make up such a large percentage of the world’s population even though they also all occur in the unique farmland ecosystem. It is the inevitable conflict with humans on commercial and communal farmland that created the necessity for the establishment of the AfriCat Foundation. Habitat loss is one of the largest threats to the large carnivore populations in Namibia. Over 7,000 commercial livestock and game farms cover approximately 355,000 km² and communal land covers an estimated area of 125,000 km² of Namibia’s total 825,418 km².
  • 2010 Progress Report

    2010 Progress Report

    2010 Progress Report Reporting Period JANUARY THROUGH DECEMBER 2010 By Dr. Laurie Marker Executive Director Cheetah Conservation Fund P.O. Box 1755 Otjiwarongo Phone: 067 306225 Fax: 067 306247 Email: [email protected] CHEETAH CONSERVATION FUND 2010 Progress Report Page Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... 6 II. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................... 7 III. RESEARCH ....................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Population Dynamics ....................................................................................................................... 8 1. CCF Cheetah Sanctuary Captive Cheetahs ................................................................................. 10 2. Medical Exams of CCF Captive Cheetahs ................................................................................... 11 3. Dental Work, Surgeries and General Health ............................................................................. 13 4. Deaths, Euthanasia, and Necropsies ......................................................................................... 14 B. Health and Reproduction ............................................................................................................... 14 1. Clinical Research: Student Intern Projects ...............................................................................
  • Namibia Desert Conservation Program September 20 – December 13, 2013 Student Information Packet Part 1

    Namibia Desert Conservation Program September 20 – December 13, 2013 Student Information Packet Part 1

    Namibia Desert Conservation Program September 20 – December 13, 2013 Student Information Packet Part 1 Congratulations on your acceptance as a student researcher for the Fall 2013 Round River Namibia Conservation Project! What follows is detailed information about the program, divided into four sections: 1) Background Information: Conservation in Namibia – Gives an overview of the conservation efforts and protected areas in Namibia as well as an introduction to the natural history of the area. 2) Academics – Discusses courses, background readings, required texts, transfer credits, etc. 3) Logistics and Pre-Program Planning – Pre-departure and upon arrival details, health and safety considerations, contact information, and a list of required equipment and supplies. 4) During the Program - Information about getting into Namibia, where you will be staying, what to expect, etc. Note: Updated project information will be sent out before your departure, including a rough program itinerary and an overview of projects you will be contributing to. By participating in this program, you will be provided with a mix of academic and field experience applying a conservation biology perspective to issues pertaining to the black rhino, mountain zebra, black-faced impala, desert elephants, and other wildlife in southwestern Africa. You will operate from a base camp at the outpost of “Wereldsend” located in the Kunene Region of northwestern Namibia. You will spend most of your time away from the base camp, doing fieldwork. Formal and informal conversations and lectures, on an array of subjects, will take place weekly. The program emphasizes an experiential learning approach and involves both group and individual activities. You will be working under the guidance of Round River program leaders, as well as our Namibian partners, and may also spend time interacting with local community members.