This Report Summarizes Nonresident Visitors to Montana During Quarter(S) 1,2,3,4, 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Report Summarizes Nonresident Visitors to Montana During Quarter(S) 1,2,3,4, 2018 This report summarizes nonresident visitors to Montana during quarter(s) 1,2,3,4, 2018. These travelers spent at least one night in the following city: Whitefish. This sample size of 141 survey respondents, which equates to 5.4% of all nonresident visitors, represents a total of 661,209 people. Sites Visited on Trip Group Characteristics 89% Glacier National Park 17% of groups with all first time visitors 33% Flathead Lake State Parks 70% of groups with all repeat visitors 28% Yellowstone National Park 13% of groups with mixed first time and repeat visitors 16% Other Montana State Parks 39% Flew on a portion of their trip 14% National Bison Range 8% Own a 2nd property in MT 6% Lewis & Clark Interpretive Ctr, Great Falls 8% Hired an outfitter 5% Hot springs 76% Plan to return within 2 years 5% Big Hole Battlefield 5% Little Bighorn Battlefield Reasons for Trip 5% Grizzly & Wolf Discovery Center, West Yellowstone primary all reasons reason 3% Lolo Pass Interpretive Center 69% Vacation/recreation/pleasure 84% 3% Missouri River Breaks Nat'l Monument Visit friends/relatives/family 3% Ghost towns 22% 36% event 2% Museum of the Rockies, Bozeman 6% Business/convention/meeting 8% 2% Missouri Headwaters State Park 1% Other 3% 2% Bob Marshall Wilderness 1% Just passing through 7% 2% Lewis & Clark Caverns State Park 1% Shopping 1% 2% MT Historical Museum, Helena 1% Virginia/Nevada City 1% CM Russell Museum, Great Falls 1% Clark Canyon Reservoir 1% Bighorn Canyon Nat'l Recreation Area 1% Fort Peck Lake 1% Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation -- Pompey's Pillar -- C.M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge -- Ft. Peck Interpertive Center & Museum Activities Average Length of Stay in MT 6.42 nights 56% Scenic driving Of Nights Spent in MT 56% Day hiking 78% of nights spent in Glacier Country 43% Recreational shopping 10% of nights spent in Yellowstone Country 29% Wildlife watching 5% of nights spent in Central Montana Region 29% Visit local brewery 28% Nature photography 3% of nights spent in Southwest Montana Region 17% Visiting other historical sites 3% of nights spent in Southeast Montana Region 15% Skiing / snowboarding 1% of nights spent in Missouri River Country 13% Visiting museums 13% Car / RV camping Percent of Nights Spent in Each Lodging Type 12% Visit farmers market 46% Hotel/motel 12% Viewing art exhibits 17% Home/condo/cabin of friend/relative 11% Attending festivals or events 10% Resort/condominium 9% Visit local distillery 7% Private campground 8% Visiting Lewis & Clark sites 7% Rented entire cabin/home 8% Attend wedding 5% My second home/condo/cabin 7% Fishing / fly fishing 2% Bed & Breakfast 7% Birding 2% Public land camping 6% Cross-country skiing 1% Other 4% River rafting / floating 1% Guest ranch 4% Canoeing / kayaking 1% Rented room in home 3% Golfing <1% Vehicle in parking area 3% Snowmobiling 3% Horseback riding 3% Bicycling Montana Entry Points 3% Backpacking 19% Kalispell Air 3% Motorcyle touring 12% Rooseville 3% Visiting Indian reservations 9% Superior 3% Sporting event 8% Targhee Pass 3% Motorboating 3% Mountain biking 5% Monida 2% Attending performing arts 5% Wibaux/Beach 1% Dinosaur attraction 4% West Yellowstone 1% Rock climbing 4% Lodge Grass 1% Rockhounding 4% Culbertson/Bainville 1% Snowshoeing 4% Troy <1% Road / tour bicycling <1% OHV / ATV 3% Bozeman Air -- Hunting 3% Alzada -- Geocaching 3% Billings Air 2% Gardiner Travel Mode to Enter MT 2% Missoula Air 63% Auto/Truck 27% Air 6% RV/Trailer 3% Motorcycle 1% Train -- Bus -- Other If on Vacation, Attracted to Montana for... Primary Attraction All Attractions 38% Glacier National Park 64% 14% Family / friends 28% 10% Mountains / forests 77% 10% Ski / Snowboard 20% 7% Special events 14% 7% Open space / uncrowded areas 48% 6% Yellowstone National Park 20% 2% Lakes 42% 2% Fish 11% 2% Camping 10% 2% Resort / guest ranch 9% 1% Other Montana history & culture 8% 1% Rivers 43% <1% Lewis & Clark history 8% -- A Montana State Park 9% -- Hiking 29% -- Hunting 1% -- Native American history & culture 7% -- Northern great plains / Badlands 6% -- Snowmobile 4% -- Wildlife 29% Satisfaction with Aspects of Montana Very Somewhat Somewhat Very Dissatisfied Satisfied N/A Mean dissatisfied dissatisfied satisfied satisfied Highway rest areas 4% 1% -- 3% 27% 24% 42% 5.07 Availability of recycling bins 7% 5% 6% 13% 24% 17% 28% 4.31 Availability of travel information 4% -- 1% 4% 39% 41% 12% 5.27 Amount of historical roadside 3% 1% 1% 5% 36% 34% 20% 5.2 information Access to public lands 3% -- 1% 3% 25% 47% 20% 5.38 Amount of open space 4% -- -- 2% 20% 71% 3% 5.58 Wildlife viewing opportunities 3% 1% <1% 2% 28% 55% 11% 5.49 Stewardship of the land 3% -- 2% 8% 25% 44% 18% 5.28 A feeling of being welcomed 4% 1% <1% 2% 24% 69% 1% 5.55 Main streets reflecting local 4% <1% -- 9% 29% 53% 5% 5.36 culture/heritage Restaurants with local products 4% -- <1% 8% 32% 51% 5% 5.32 Availability of local arts and crafts 4% <1% 2% 5% 26% 46% 17% 5.3 Residency Respondent Age 11% Washington 24 - 80 Age range 9% Alberta, Canada 56 Average age 7% Florida 60 Median age 6% Wisconsin Respondent Gender 6% Colorado 51% Male 6% California 49% Female 5% Wyoming 17% First time visitor 4% Georgia 4% Michigan Household Income 4% North Dakota 8% Less than $50,000 4% Idaho 15% $50,000 to less than $75,000 4% Ohio 16% $75,000 to less than $100,000 3% British Columbia, Canada 38% $100,000 to less than $150,000 3% New Mexico 9% $150,000 to less than $200,000 3% Minnesota 14% $200,000 or greater 2% Missouri 2% New York 2% Oregon 2% Arizona 2% Texas 1% Maryland 1% Illinois 1% Utah 1% Indiana 1% England 1% Pennsylvania 1% Quebec, Canada 1% Saskatchewan, Canada 1% New Jersey 1% Kentucky 1% Oklahoma 1% Connecticut 1% Rhode Island <1% Tennessee, Iowa Age Groups Represented 7% 0-5 years 8% 6-10 years 8% 11-17 years 2% 18-24 years 16% 25-34 years 15% 35-44 years 16% 45-54 years 41% 55-64 years 40% 65-74 years 5% 75 and over Travel Group Type Average Group Size: 2.24 19% Self Travel Group Size 53% Couple 19% 1 traveler 16% Immediate Family 62% 2 travelers 2% Family & Friends 4% 3 travelers 8% Friends 11% 4 travelers 1% Business Associates 1% 5 travelers -- Extended Family 1% 6 travelers 1% Organized Group or Club <1% 7 travelers -- 8 travelers <1% 9 travelers 1% 10 travelers -- more than 10 Info Sources Used for Trip Planning Sources Used During Trip Most All Most All Useful Used Useful Used 31% Search Engine (i.e. Google) 62% 24% Search engine (e.g., Google) 55% 14% Info. from friend/relative living in MT 27% 20% Map applications (i.e. GoogleMaps) 58% 8% Info. from previous visitor(s) to MT 19% 13% National Park brochure/book/website 44% 11% Info. from friend/relative living in MT 23% 7% Official MT website (VisitMT.com) 18% 5% Used No Sources 14% 7% Automobile club (i.e. AAA) 9% 5% Consumer online reviews (i.e. TripAdvisor) 12% 6% Consumer online reviews (i.e. TripAdvisor) 22% 3% Visitor information center staff 25% 5% Used no sources 13% 3% Regional MT travel guide(s) 10% 4% National Park brochure/book/website 27% 3% MT community travel guide(s) 6% 3% Guide book (i.e. Frommer's Lonely Planet) 7% 3% Other 7% 3% Social media (i.e. Facebook) 12% 2% Info. from private business (e.g., resort/motel/attraction) 7% 3% Other 7% 2% Brochure information rack 17% 2% Mobile apps 7% 1% Official highway information signs 20% 2% Magazine/newspaper articles 6% 1% Official MT website (VisitMT.com) 7% 1% Official MT guidebook magazine 6% 1% Mobile apps 16% 1% Professional online travel reviews 6% 1% Social media (i.e. Facebook) 7% 1% Online travel agent (e.g., Travelocity) 8% <1% Official MT guidebook magazine 4% 1% MT community travel guide(s) 2% -- "Made in Montana" website 1% -- "Made in Montana" website 4% -- Billboards 5% -- Called a MT visitor info. line/center 3% -- Guide book (i.e. Frommer's Lonely Planet) 5% -- Info. from private businesses 1% -- Motel/restaurant/gas station employee -- -- Info. from special events 3% -- State Park brochure/website 7% -- Magazine/newspaper article online 9% -- Montana advertising campaign <1% -- Online Video 8% -- Other travel websites 9% -- Regional MT travel guide(s) 8% -- State Park brochure/website 7%.
Recommended publications
  • Watkins Creek Ranch Gallatin MT Property Name County State
    NPS Form 10-900a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section ___ Page __ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 06001180 Date Listed: 12/27/2006 Watkins Creek Ranch Gallatin MT Property Name County State N/A Multiple Name This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. / Signatu^e/cof the Keeper Da&e 6f Action / U =====7I^== Amended Items in Nomination: Description: The correct Town, Range, Section notation in the first paragraph should read: Range 4 Easf. The sawed ends of the corner logs on the Isabel & Frederick Lincoln Cabin (Building #9) are not tapered, as they are on the similar Guest Duplex Cabins (#6-8), marking the slightly different form and details of the later cabin. These clarifications were confirmed with the MT SHPO office. DISTRIBUTION: National Register property file Nominating Authority (without nomination attachment) NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Oct. 1990) National Park Service RECEIVED 2280 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 3 NAT PF<N MATIAMAI OADl/ irK'k/rJ-" uco iiniruiiriL i nilM OLIIVILC 1. Name of Property historic name: Watkins Creek Ranch other name/site number: Firehole Ranch 2. Location street & number: 1207 Firehole Ranch Road not for publication: n/a vicinity: n/a city/town: West Yellowstone state: Montana code: MT county: Gallatin code: 031 zip code: 59758 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Travel Corridors:The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors Based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research 1-1-2013 Montana Travel Corridors:The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point Christine Oschell The University of Montana-Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/itrr_pubs Part of the Leisure Studies Commons, Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons, and the Tourism and Travel Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Oschell, Christine, "Montana Travel Corridors:The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point" (2013). Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications. 94. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/itrr_pubs/94 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Montana Travel Corridors: The Driving Routes of Nonresident Visitors based on Overnight Location and State Entry Point Research Report 2013-12 Prepared by: Christine Oschell, Ph.D. Institute for Tourism & Recreation Research College of Forestry and Conservation The University of Montana Missoula, MT 59812
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2020 to 09/30/2020 Lolo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 07/01/2020 to 09/30/2020 Lolo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A. Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] *UPDATED* Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations apply to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the US mining laws. More Information is available at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/science-technology/geology/minerals/locatable-minerals/current-revisions. R1 - Northern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Bob Marshall Wilderness - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:04/2015 04/2015 Debbie Mucklow Outfitter and Guide Permit - Special use management Scoping Start 03/29/2014 406-758-6464 Reissuance [email protected] CE Description: Reissuance of existing outfitter and guide permits in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=44827 Location: UNIT - Swan Lake Ranger District, Hungry Horse Ranger District, Lincoln Ranger District, Rocky Mountain Ranger District, Seeley Lake Ranger District, Spotted Bear Ranger District.
    [Show full text]
  • NW Montana Joint Information Center Fire Update August 27, 2003, 10:00 AM
    NW Montana Joint Information Center Fire Update August 27, 2003, 10:00 AM Center Hours 6 a.m. – 9 p.m. Phone # (406) 755-3910 www.fs.fed.us/nwacfire Middle Fork River from Bear Creek to West Glacier is closed. Stanton Lake area is reopened. Highway 2 is NOT closed. North Fork road from Glacier Rim to Polebridge is open but NO stopping along the road and all roads off the North Fork remain closed. The Red Meadows Road remains closed to the public. The Going-to-the-Sun Highway is open. Road #895 along the west side of Hungry Horse Reservoir is CLOSED to the junction of Road #2826 (Meadow Creek Road). Stage II Restrictions are still in effect. Blackfoot Lake Complex Includes the Beta Lake-Doris Ridge fires, Ball fire, and the Blackfoot lake complex of fires located on Flathead National Forest, south of Hungry Horse; Hungry Horse, MT. Fire Information (406) 755-3910, 892-0946. Size: unknown due to weather yesterday, a recon flight is planned for today Status: Doris Mountain Fire was active yesterday with runs in a northeast direction. Burnout operations were successful on the Beta Lake Fire. Ball Fire was very active and lines did not hold. The other fires within the complex were active but due to weather conditions information is still incoming. Road #895 from Highway 2 along the west side of Hungry Horse Reservoir to junction of Road #2826 is closed. Campgrounds along the Westside of the reservoir are also closed. Emery Campground is closed. Outlook: Burnout operations will continue today on the Beta Lake and Doris Mountain Fires as long as conditions allow.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 CURRENT HEBGEN LAKE ZONING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2002 David Klatt, Chairman Gibson Bailey Dee Rothschiller Linda Blank Bob Lindst
    CURRENT HEBGEN LAKE ZONING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2002 David Klatt, Chairman Gibson Bailey Dee Rothschiller Linda Blank Bob Lindstrom ORIGINAL HEBGEN LAKE ZONING ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1976 Richard W. Drew, Chairman Dean L. Nelson David Rightenour Raymond G. Carkeek E. L. Spainhower Daniel C. McDonald Steven Trimble Howard A. Micklewright Roland Whitman Rob Klatt - Project Coordinator GALLATIN COUNTY COMISSIONERS, 2004 John Vincent, Chairman Bill Murdock Jennifer Smith Mitchell The preparation of this plan was financed, in part, through an urban planning grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development under provisions of Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954 as amended. The revision and update of this plan was financed, in part, by Gallatin County, the Sonoran Institute, the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, the West Yellowstone Community Foundation, and the West Yellowstone Foundation. f:\zone\HL\hebgen.pn 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………………………………………...6 Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………...7 Population ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..9 Land Use ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Weather and Climate ………………………………………………………………………………………..15 Soils …………………………………………………………………………………………………………...18 Geology………………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 Topography – Slope and Vegetative Cover ………………………………………………………………35 Fish and Wildlife ……………………………………………………………………………………………..39 Water Resources……………………………………………………………………………………………..47 Ecological Evaluations ….................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 21-026-Lolo 1 of 2 LOLO NATIONAL FOREST 24 FORT MISSOULA
    21-026-Lolo LOLO NATIONAL FOREST 24 FORT MISSOULA MISSOULA, MT 59804 Forest Supervisor’s Order STAGE II FIRE RESTRICTION ORDER Pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 551, and 36 C.F.R. §261.50 (a), the following acts are prohibited on all National Forest System lands administered by the Lolo National Forest in Granite, Missoula, Mineral, Powell, Ravalli, and Sanders Counties in Montana. The Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, including the Scapegoat Wilderness, are not included in or affected by this order. PROHIBITIONS 1. 36 CFR § 261.52(a) Building, maintaining, attending, or using a fire, campfire or stove fire. 2. 36 CFR § 261.52(d) Smoking, except within an enclosed vehicle or building, a developed recreation site, or while stopped in an area at least three feet in diameter that is barren or closed of all flammable materials. 3. 36 CFR § 261.52(h) Operating an Internal Combustion Engine. 4. 36 CFR § 261.52(i) Welding or operating an acetylene or other torch with open flame. PURPOSE The purpose of this order is to reduce the probability of human-caused ignitions of wildfire during times of dry fuel conditions. STAGE II RESTRICTIONS AREA All National Forest System lands administered by the Lolo National Forest in Granite, Missoula, Mineral, Powell, Ravalli, and Sanders Counties in Montana, except for the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex, including the Scapegoat Wilderness, which are not included in or affected by this order. Please note that all Lolo National Forest system lands within the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex and the Scapegoat Wilderness are subject to a Stage I Fire Restriction Order currently in effect.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex Newsletter
    Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex VOLUME 30 2021 Newsletter Invitation from your lead Ranger We look forward to visiting with you at our annual Limits of Acceptable Change (LAC) public meeting and information-share this spring! This year, the meeting will be in a virtual format and will take place on Saturday, April 17th from 9:00am to 12:00pm. I hope you can join us to share news and exchange ideas. Please email [email protected] to obtain the virtual meeting link. I know I speak for all the Complex staff when I say that we value you leaning in with us on managing this magnificent treasure. SATURDAY, April 17th 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. Virtual meeting via Zoom Scott Snelson, 2021 BMWC Lead Ranger Spotted Bear RD, Flathead NF Sidebar photo credit: Laura Mills Nelson Introduction from your Lead Ranger, Scott Snelson This season I take over the lead Ranger position for the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. Hats off to my predecessor, District Ranger Mike Muñoz from the Rocky Mountain District. High praise to him for playing the coordination role between the Hungry Horse/Glacier View, Lincoln, Seeley Lake, Spotted Bear and Swan Lake Ranger Districts that are charged with stewarding this special place. Kind of a bit of a thankless task that Mike performed for us over the past three years. I lavishly appreciate him herein. I’ll do my best to fill the shoes. As the winter season ebbs, the Spotted Bear Ranger District (SBRD) is already in high gear getting ready for our return to the District Office at the confluence of the Southfork of the Flathead and Spotted Bear Rivers in mid-May.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Mineral resource potential of national forest RARE II and wilderness areas in Montana Compiled by Christopher E. Williams 1 and Robert C. Pearson2 Open-File Report 84-637 1984 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. 1 Present address 2 Denver, Colorado U.S. Environmental Protection Agency/NEIC Denver, Colorado CONTENTS (See also indices listings, p. 128-131) Page Introduction*........................................................... 1 Beaverhead National Forest............................................... 2 North Big Hole (1-001).............................................. 2 West Pioneer (1-006)................................................ 2 Eastern Pioneer Mountains (1-008)................................... 3 Middle Mountain-Tobacco Root (1-013)................................ 4 Potosi (1-014)...................................................... 5 Madison/Jack Creek Basin (1-549).................................... 5 West Big Hole (1-943)............................................... 6 Italian Peak (1-945)................................................ 7 Garfield Mountain (1-961)........................................... 7 Mt. Jefferson (1-962)............................................... 8 Bitterroot National Forest.............................................. 9 Stony Mountain (LI-BAD)............................................. 9 Allan Mountain (Ll-YAG)............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness-Watcher-Summer-2021
    Wilderness WILDERNESS WATCH eeping Wilderness Wild WATCHER The Quarterly Newsletter of Wilderness Watch Volume 32 • Number 2 • Summer 2021 Should We Poison the Scapegoat? by Gary Macfarlane he Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife review of actions that are done pursuant to section 4(c) and Parks (FWP) recently put forth a five- of the Wilderness Act. The extensive helicopter and other year plan to poison 67 miles of the North motorized equipment and transport proposed in this TFork of the Blackfoot River and three lakes in the project are activities that are presumptively prohibited Scapegoat Wilderness. The Scapegoat is the southern in Wilderness under Section 4(c). … If a CE can be used anchor of the famed Bob Marshall Wilderness Com- in Wilderness to exempt projects of this size and scope, plex, an area of 1.6 utilizing a wide array of million unbroken acres generally prohibited uses of designated Wil- and significantly altering derness that is home ecological processes, then to rare species such as one has to wonder if any grizzly bears, wolves, project ever would rise to and wolverines. the level of an EA or EIS in Wilderness no matter The proposal poses a how harmful. myriad of problems beyond poisoning The background behind streams and lakes this shows how ill-ad- and much of the life vised the plan is, beyond that lives in them. its inappropriate impacts There’s the 93 he- to Wilderness. There licopter flights and North Fork of the Blackfoot River, Scapegoat Wilderness. USFS were no trout or likely landings, plus the use other fish historically of motorboats, pumps, above the North Fork and gas-powered generators—all in a place where Falls.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire-On-Fire Interactions in Three Large Wilderness Areas
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2012 Fire-on-Fire Interactions in Three Large Wilderness Areas Casey Teske The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Teske, Casey, "Fire-on-Fire Interactions in Three Large Wilderness Areas" (2012). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 451. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/451 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FIRE-ON-FIRE INTERACTIONS IN THREE LARGE WILDERNESS AREAS By Casey C. Teske M.S., Forest Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 2002 B.S., Chemistry, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 1999 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forestry The University of Montana Missoula, MT February 2012 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Associate Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School LLoyd P. Queen, Chair Department of Forest Management Carl A. Seielstad Department of Forest Management Ronald H. Wakimoto Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences Anna Klene Department of Geography Colin Hardy Department of Forest Management Teske, Casey, Ph.D., Spring 2012 College of Forestry and Conservation Fire-on-Fire Interactions in Three Large Wilderness Areas Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex Newsletter 2020
    Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex VOLUME 29 2020 Newsletter A Note from your lead Ranger 2020 Limits of Acceptable Change Meeting Canceled At the USDA Forest Service, the health and well-being of our employees and the people we serve are our top priority. The LAC (Limits of Acceptable Change) Meeting scheduled for April 4, 2020 has been canceled at this time. We remain committed to public involvement in forest management. Information about the status of the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex will be provided through our website and social media. Every one of you interested in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex remains key for us as wilderness stewards in staying current on both land and social concerns, wilderness resource issues, and simply general observations. Your feedback on areas of interest remains appreciated! As such, the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex managers, Forest Service representatives from the Helena-Lewis and Clark, Lolo, and Flathead National Forests, and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks representatives still look forward to hearing from you in other formats or future events. Lastly, we do plan to hold our managers meeting, albeit virtually. Good days to you. -Michael Muñoz, Ranger Rocky Mountain Ranger District, Helena-Lewis and Clark NF Introduction The Bob Marshall Wilderness complex is comprised of the Bob Marshall, Great Bear and Scapegoat designated wildernesses and also has ties with adjacent wildlands that provide the access and trailheads to the wilderness. We the managers or stewards, if you will, really value the opportunity to meet and talk with wilderness users, supporters and advocates. 2019/2020– Although we again, on the RMRD, experienced flooding events that damaged roads on NFS lands, as well as county roads, much of the remaining season was relatively quiet.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest MONTANA Visitvisit Southwest MONTANA
    visit SouthWest MONTANA visitvisit SouthWest MONTANA 2016 OFFICIAL REGIONAL TRAVEL GUIDE SOUTHWESTMT.COM • 800-879-1159 Powwow (Lisa Wareham) Sawtooth Lake (Chuck Haney) Pronghorn Antelope (Donnie Sexton) Bannack State Park (Donnie Sexton) SouthWest MONTANABetween Yellowstone National Park and Glacier National Park lies a landscape that encapsulates the best of what Montana’s about. Here, breathtaking crags pierce the bluest sky you’ve ever seen. Vast flocks of trumpeter swans splash down on the emerald waters of high mountain lakes. Quiet ghost towns beckon you back into history. Lively communities buzz with the welcoming vibe and creative energy of today’s frontier. Whether your passion is snowboarding or golfing, microbrews or monster trout, you’ll find endless riches in Southwest Montana. You’ll also find gems of places to enjoy a hearty meal or rest your head — from friendly roadside diners to lavish Western resorts. We look forward to sharing this Rexford Yaak Eureka Westby GLACIER Whitetail Babb Sweetgrass Four Flaxville NATIONAL Opheim Buttes Fortine Polebridge Sunburst Turner remarkable place with you. Trego St. Mary PARK Loring Whitewater Peerless Scobey Plentywood Lake Cut Bank Troy Apgar McDonald Browning Chinook Medicine Lake Libby West Glacier Columbia Shelby Falls Coram Rudyard Martin City Chester Froid Whitefish East Glacier Galata Havre Fort Hinsdale Saint Hungry Saco Lustre Horse Park Valier Box Belknap Marie Elder Dodson Vandalia Kalispell Essex Agency Heart Butte Malta Culbertson Kila Dupuyer Wolf Marion Bigfork Flathead River Glasgow Nashua Poplar Heron Big Sandy Point Somers Conrad Bainville Noxon Lakeside Rollins Bynum Brady Proctor Swan Lake Fort Fairview Trout Dayton Virgelle Peck Creek Elmo Fort Benton Loma Thompson Big Arm Choteau Landusky Zortman Sidney Falls Hot Springs Polson Lambert Crane CONTENTS Condon Fairfield Great Haugan Ronan Vaughn Plains Falls Savage De Borgia Charlo Augusta Winifred Bloomfield St.
    [Show full text]