DOCSLIB.ORG

Sgs Qualifor Forest Management Certification Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sgs Qualifor Forest Management Certification Report SGS QUALIFOR Doc. Number: AD 36-A-06 (Associated Document) Doc. Version date: 20 Mar. 08 Page: 1 of 50 FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT SECTION A: PUBLIC SUMMARY Project Nr: 7833-ZA Client: HM Timber Limited – Matiwane Forests Web Page: www.hansmerensky.co.za Address: HM Timber Limited – Matiwane Forests , PO Box 20, WEZA, 4685, South Africa. Country: South Africa Certificate Nr. SGS-FM/CoC-001503 Certificate Type: Forest Management Date of Issue 08 Sept 2008 Date of expiry: 07 Sept 2013 SGS Forest Management Standard (AD33) adapted for South Africa version 04 of 29 Evaluation Standard March 2010 Forest Zone: Temperate Total Certified Area 23 630 ha Scope: Forest management of plantations in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa; the production and sale of softwood and hardwood sawn timber products at Langeni Sawmill. New Scope The forest management of HM Timber Limited’s Matiwane FSC Pure hardwood and FSC Pure softwood plantations in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, for the production of timber for 26/8/2009 sale to clients; and supply to Langeni sawmill for the production of Sawn Timber and sawmill by- products for sale on the Chain of Custody Transfer system. Location of the FMUs Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, in the vicinity of Mthatha included in the scope Company Contact Bernard Bakker Person: Address: HM Timber Limited: Matiwane Forests, PO Box 20, WEZA, 4685, Rep. of South Africa. Tel: (039) 553 0401 Fax (039) 553 0425 Email: [email protected] Evaluation dates: Main Evaluation 21st – 23rd of July 2008 Surveillance 1 24th – 26th /8/2009 SGS services are rendered in accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm SGS South Africa (Qualifor Programme) 58 Melville Road, Booysens - PO Box 82582, Southdale 2185 -South Africa Systems and Services Certification Division Contact Programme Director at t. +27 11 681-2500 [email protected] www.sgs.com/forestry AD 36-A-06 Page 2 of 50 Surveillance 2 26 – 28 / 10 / 2010 Surveillance 3 Surveillance 4 Copyright: © 2010 SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd All rights reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SCOPE OF CERTIFICATE .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. COMPANY BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Ownership ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Company Key Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Company History ................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4 Organisational Structure ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Ownership and Use Rights .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.6 Other Land Uses ................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.7 Non-certified Forests ........................................................................................................................................... 9 All the land leased under this contract is certified. .......................................................................................................... 9 3. FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................................................................................... 10 3.1 History of use .................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Planning process ............................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3 Harvesting and regeneration ............................................................................................................................. 11 3.4 Monitoring processes ........................................................................................................................................ 11 4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT........................................................................ 11 4.1 Social aspects ................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Environmental aspects ...................................................................................................................................... 12 4.2.1 Bio-geographical considerations. .................................................................................................................. 12 4.2.2 Sites of Special Interest & Natural Heritage Sites. ........................................................................................ 12 4.2.3 Management for biodiversity ......................................................................................................................... 13 4.3 Administration, Legislation and Guidelines ........................................................................................................ 14 5. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT, HARVESTING, SILVICULTURE AND MONITORING .......................... 17 6. PREPARATION FOR THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................ 17 6.1 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................................... 17 6.2 Team ................................................................................................................................................................. 18 6.3 Checklist Preparation ........................................................................................................................................ 18 6.4 Stakeholder notification ..................................................................................................................................... 18 7. THE EVALUATION .................................................................................................................................... 18 7.1 Opening meeting ............................................................................................................................................... 18 7.2 Document review ............................................................................................................................................... 18 7.3 Sampling and Evaluation Approach .................................................................................................................. 19 AD 36-A-06 Page 3 of 50 7.4 Field assessments ............................................................................................................................................. 19 7.5 Stakeholder interviews ...................................................................................................................................... 19 7.6 Summing up and closing meeting ..................................................................................................................... 19 8. EVALUATION RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 20 8.1 Findings related to the general QUALIFOR Programme ................................................................................... 20 PRINCIPLE 1: Compliance with law and FSC Principles .................................................................................... 20 PRINCIPLE 2: Tenure and use rights and responsibilities .................................................................................. 21 PRINCIPLE 3: Indigenous peoples’ rights .......................................................................................................... 21 PRINCIPLE 4: Community relations and workers rights ..................................................................................... 22 PRINCIPLE 5: Benefits from the forest .............................................................................................................. 23 PRINCIPLE 6: Environmental impact ................................................................................................................. 24 PRINCIPLE 7: Management plan ....................................................................................................................... 27 PRINCIPLE 8: Monitoring and evaluation ........................................................................................................... 28 PRINCIPLE 9: High Conservation Value Forests................................................................................................ 29 PRINCIPLE 10: Plantations .................................................................................................................................. 30 9. CERTIFICATION DECISION .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exkursionen Excursions
    EXKURSIONEN EXCURSIONS 174 MITT.ÖSTERR.MINER.GES. 161 (2015) A GEOLOGICAL EXCURSION TO THE MINING AREAS OF SOUTH AFRICA by Aberra Mogessie, Christoph Hauzenberger, Sara Raic, Philip Schantl, Lukas Belohlavek, Antonio Ciriello, Donia Daghighi, Bernhard Fercher, Katja Goetschl, Hugo Graber, Magdalena Mandl, Veronika Preissegger, Gerald Raab, Felix Rauschenbusch, Theresa Sattler, Simon Schorn, Katica Simic, Michael Wedenig & Sebastian Wiesmair Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Graz, Universitaetsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz Frank Melcher, Walter Prochaska, Heinrich Mali, Heinz Binder, Marco Dietmayer-Kräutler, Franz Christian Friedman, Maximilian Mathias Haas, Ferdinand Jakob Hampl, Gustav Erwin Hanke, Wolfgang Hasenburger, Heidi Maria Kaltenböck, Peter Onuk, Andrea Roswitha Pamsl, Karin Pongratz, Thomas Schifko, Sebastian Emanuel Schilli, Sonja Schwabl, Cornelia Tauchner, Daniela Wallner & Juliane Hentschke Chair of Geology and Economic Geology, Mining University of Leoben, Peter-Tunner-Strasse 5, A-8700 Leoben Christoph Gauert Department of Geology, University of the Free State, South Africa 1. Preface Almost a year ago Aberra Mogessie planned to organize a field excursion for the students of the Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Graz. The choices were Argentina, Ethiopia (where we had organized past excursions) and South Africa. Having discussed the matter with Christoph Hauzenberger concerning geology, logistics etc. we decided to organize a field excursion to the geologically interesting mining areas of South Africa. We contacted Christoph Gauert from the University of Free State, South Africa to help us with the local organization especially to get permission from the different mining companies to visit their mining sites. We had a chance to discuss with him personally during his visit to our institute at the University of Graz in May 2014 and make the first plan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centenary of the Discovery of Platinum in the Bushveld Complex (10Th November, 1906)
    CAWTHORN, R.G. The centenary of the discovery of platinum in the Bushveld Complex (10th November, 1906). International Platinum Conference ‘Platinum Surges Ahead’, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 2006. The centenary of the discovery of platinum in the Bushveld Complex (10th November, 1906) R.G. CAWTHORN School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa The earliest authenticated scientific report of the occurrence of platinum in rocks from the Bushveld Complex appears to be by William Bettel on 10th November 1906. Thereafter, prospecting of the chromite-rich rocks for platinum proved frustrating. I suggest that the resurgence of interest shown by Dr Hans Merensky in 1924 resulted from his realization that newly-panned platinum had a different grain size from that in the chromite layers and indicated a different source rock, which he located and it became known as the Merensky Reef. Merensky’s discoveries in Johannesburg). He found it contained ‘silver, gold, The story of Dr. Hans Merensky’s discoveries of the platinum and iridium (with osmium)’. Hence, the presence platinum-rich pipes and the Merensky Reef itself in 1924 of the platinum-group elements (PGE) in South Africa in have been well documented (Cawthorn, 1999; Scoon and minor amounts was well-established by the end of the Mitchell, 2004, and references therein), but the events that nineteenth century. preceded it have not been summarized. In the probable centenary year of the first report of platinum in the In situ platinum Bushveld it is appropriate to review the events between In his article Bettel reported that he had ‘recently’ (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 358.5 Kb
    Seventy-fifth Anniversary of the Discovery of the Platiniferous MerenskvJ Reef THE LARGEST PLATINUM DEPOSITS IN THE WORLD By Professor R. Grant Cawthorn Department of Geology, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa The Merensky Reef is a thin layer of igneous rock in the Bushveld Complex in South Africa, which, with an underlying layer, the Upper Group 2 chromitite, contains 75 per cent of the world’s known platinum resources. It was discovered in September 1924 by Hans Merensky, and by early 1926 had been traced for about 150 km. However, large-scale mining of the reef did not develop until aproliferation of uses for theplatinumgroup metals in the 1950s increased demand and price. Successful extraction of metal from the Upper Group 2 chromitite had to wait until the 1970s for metallurgical developments. In 1923 platinum was discovered in the rivers. In early June 1924, a white metal was Waterberg region of South Africa, and alerted panned in a stream on a small farm called geologists to its presence there, see Figure 1. At Maandagshoek, 20 km west of Burgersfort, see that time world demand for platinum was not Figure 2, by a farmedprospector called Andries great, and the economic slump during the years Lombaard. Suspecting it was platinum, he of the Great Depression, which followed soon sent it to Dr Hans Merensky for confirmation. afterwards, reduced demand and price still fur- Hans Merensky was a consulting geologist and ther. Consequently, the discovery in 1924 was mining engineer in Johannesburg. Together, almost before its time. Lombaard and Merensky followed the “tail” of Platinum, like gold and diamonds, has a high platinum in their pan upstream into some hills density and forms stable minerals, which accu- on Maandagshoek, where they finally found mulate at the sandy bottoms of streams and platinum in solid rock on 15th August 1924.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bushveld Igneous Complex
    The Bushveld Igneous Complex THE GEOLOGY OF SOUTH AFRICA’S PLATINUM RESOURCES By C. A. Cousins, MSC. Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Company Limited A vast composite body of plutonic and volcanic rock in the central part of the Transvaal, the Bushveld igneous complex includes the platinum reef worked by Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited and constituting the world’s greatest reserve of the platinum metals. This article describes the geological and economic aspects of this unusually interesting formation. In South Africa platinum occurs chiefly in square miles. Two of these areas lie at the the Merensky Reef, which itself forms part of eastern and western ends of the Bushveld and the Bushveld igneous complex, an irregular form wide curved belts, trending parallel to oval area of some 15,000 square miles occupy- the sedimentary rocks which they overlie, and ing a roughly central position in the province dipping inwards towards the centre of the of the Transvaal. A geological map of the Bushveld at similar angles. The western belt area, which provides the largest known has a flat sheet-like extension reaching the example of this interesting type of formation, western boundary of the Transvaal. The is shown on the facing page. third area extends northwards and cuts out- The complex rests upon a floor of sedi- side the sedimentary basin. Its exact relation- mentary rocks of the Transvaal System. This ship to the other outcrops within the basin floor is structurally in the form of an immense has not as yet been solved. oval basin, three hundred miles long and a As the eastern and western belts contain hundred miles broad.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Trends in the Resource Sustainability of Platinum Group Elements
    Ore Geology Reviews 46 (2012) 106–117 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Ore Geology Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oregeorev Key trends in the resource sustainability of platinum group elements Gavin M. Mudd ⁎ Environmental Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Melbourne, Australia article info abstract Article history: Platinum group elements (PGEs) are increasingly used in a variety of environmentally-related technologies, Received 6 November 2011 such as chemical process catalysts, catalytic converters for vehicle exhaust control, hydrogen fuel cells, Received in revised form 3 February 2012 electronic components, and a variety of specialty medical uses, amongst others — almost all of which have Accepted 3 February 2012 strong expected growth to meet environmental and technological challenges this century. Economic Available online 11 February 2012 geologists have been arguing on the case of abundant geologic resources of PGEs for some time while others still raise concerns about long-term supply — yet there remains no detailed analysis of formally reported Keywords: Platinum group elements (PGEs) mineral resources and key trends in the PGEs sector. This paper presents such a detailed review of the Economic mineral resources PGEs sector, including detailed mine production statistics and mineral resources by principal ore types, pro- Mineral resource sustainability viding an authoritative case study on the resource sustainability for a group of elements which are uniquely Bushveld Complex concentrated in a select few regions of the earth. The methodology, compiled data sets and trends provide Great Dyke strong assurance on the contribution that PGEs can make to the key sustainability and technology challenges – Noril'sk Talnakh of the 21st century such as energy and pollution control.
    [Show full text]
  • Sgs Qualifor Forest Management Certification Report
    SGS QUALIFOR Doc. Number: AD 36A-12 (Associated Documents) Doc. Version date: 21 Sept. 2010 Page: 1 of 50 Approved by: Gerrit Marais FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT SECTION A: PUBLIC SUMMARY Project Nr: 7599-ZA Client: HM Timber Limited – Berg and East Griqualand Forests Web Page: www.hansmerensky.co.za Address: PO Box 20, Weza, KwaZulu-Natal, 4685 Country: South Africa Certificate Nr. SGS-FM/COC-000780 Certificate Type: Forest Management / CoC Date of Issue 29 July 2008 Date of expiry: 28 July 2013 SGS Forest Management Standard (AD33) adapted for South Africa, version 04, of 29 March Evaluation Standard 2010 Forest Zone: Temperate Total Certified Area 56,044.64ha Scope: The forest management of Singisi’s hardwood and softwood plantations in the KZN & E Cape provinces of South Africa for the production of FSC Pure timber for sale to clients or supply to Singisi and Weza sawmills for the production of Sawn Timber and sawmill by-products for sale on the Chain of Custody Transfer system Location of the FMUs The FMU’s are located in the Southern Kwa-Zulu/Natal province of South Africa near the included in the scope towns of Harding and Howick. Company Contact Hamish Whyle Person: Address: PO Box 20 Weza 4685 Tel: 039 553 0401 Fax 039 553 0425 Email: [email protected] Evaluation dates: SGS South Africa (Qualifor Programme) 58 Melville Road, BooysensBooysens--PO PO Box 82582, Southdale 21852185-- South Africa Systems and Services Certification Division Contact Programme Director at t. +27 11 681-2500- [email protected] www.agriculture-food.sgs.com/en/Forestry / AD 36A-12 Page 2 of 50 Main Evaluation 27 – 30 / 5/ 2008 Surveillance 1 4 – 6 May 2009 Surveillance 2 19 – 21 April 2010 Surveillance 3 24 – 26 May 2011 & COF 11 August 2011 Surveillance 4 Copyright: © 2011 SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd All rights reserved AD 36A-12 Page 3 of 50 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal and Chemical Characteristics of Hot Water Springs in the Northern Part of the Limpopo Province, South Africa
    Thermal and chemical characteristics of hot water springs in the northern part of the Limpopo Province, South Africa J Olivier1*, JS Venter2 and CZ Jonker1 1Department of Environmental Sciences, UNISA, Private Bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa 2Council for Geoscience, Private Bag X112, Pretoria 0001, South Africa Abstract In many countries thermal springs are utilised for a variety of purposes, such as the generation of power, direct space heating, industrial processes, aquaculture and many more. The optimal use of a thermal spring is largely dependent upon its physical and chemical characteristics. This article focuses on the thermal and chemical features of 8 thermal springs located in the northern part of the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Field data and water samples were collected from Evangelina, Tshipise, Sagole, Môreson, Siloam, Mphephu, Minwamadi and Die Eiland for analysis of physical and chemical parameters. The temperatures at source vary from 30°C to 67.5°C. The springs are associated with faults and impermeable dykes and are assumed to be of meteoric origin. The mineral composition of the thermal waters reflects the geological formations found at the depth of origin. None of the spring waters are fit for human consumption since they contain unacceptably high levels of bromide ions. Six springs do not conform to domestic water quality guidelines with respect to fluoride levels. Unacceptably high values of mercury were detected at Môreson and Die Eiland. Spring water at Evangelina is contaminated with selenium and arsenic. It is important to keep such limitations in mind when determin- ing the ultimate use of the thermal springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Special Issue on the Flatreef PGE-Ni-Cu Deposit, Northern Limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex
    Mineralium Deposita (2021) 56:1–10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-020-01027-y ARTICLE Introduction to the special issue on the Flatreef PGE-Ni-Cu deposit, northern limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex Wolfgang D. Maier1 & Marina Yudovskaya2 & Pedro Jugo3 Received: 19 June 2020 /Accepted: 4 November 2020 / Published online: 2 December 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract More than 30 years ago, Cox and Singer (1986) suggested that magmatic platinum-group element (PGE)-Ni-Cu deposits are amongst the best understood of ore deposits, yet the origin of PGE mineralization in the Bushveld Igneous Complex (BIC) remains controversial after a century of study. In the northern limb of the BIC, the unravelling of ore formation proved particularly difficult due to relatively poor outcrop, which is typically affected by contamination of the intruding magmas with the host rocks and expressed in the form of abundant xenoliths, footwall rafts and disturbance of magmatic stratigraphy. In this thematic issue, we present contributions on the Flatreef, a recently discovered world-class PGE-Ni-Cu deposit constituting a downdip extension of the mineralized unit of the Platreef of the northern limb. Two deep shafts are currently being sunk, making the Flatreef one of the most significant new mine development on the Bushveld in several decades. Stratigraphy of the Bushveld northern limb than equivalent units in the remainder of the Bushveld and definitions of the Platreef and Flatreef Igneous Complex. In the western and eastern Bushveld limbs, the The detailed stratigraphic relationship between the Platreef Marginal Zone comprises a compositionally and textur- and the Flatreef and potential stratigraphic correlations be- ally diverse suite of intrusives (gabbronorite, norite, py- tween both horizons with the Upper Critical Zone (UCZ) in roxenite, harzburgite) forming either sills in the floor or the western and eastern limbs of the Bushveld Complex have a contact layer at the base of the main Bushveld layered been debated for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet Two Rivers
    Fact Sheet Two Rivers he Two Rivers Platinum TMine (Two Rivers) is a joint venture between African Rainbow Minerals (ARM) (55%) and Impala Platinum Marula Platinum Holdings Limited (Implats) (45%). Two Rivers The operation is situated on the farm Dwarsrivier on the southern part of the eastern limb of the Bushveld Igneous Complex in Mpumalanga, South Africa. In FY2009 the operation produced 118,000 ounces of platinum in concentrate. The operation comprises two on-reef decline shafts and a concentrator. Managed by ARM, Two Rivers has a life-of-mine offtake agreement with Impala Refining Services (IRS). HISTORY Platinum was first discovered in the area by renowned explorer Hans Merensky on the nearby farm Maandagshoek (now Modikwa Platinum) in the 1920’s. During 2001, Assmang elected to dispose of its platinum interests at the Dwarsrivier Chrome mine. Two Rivers Platinum, the incorporated Joint Venture between Avmin and Implats secured the platinum rights in December of that year. Subsequent corporate activity involving Avmin, ARM and Harmony resulted in the transfer of Avmin’s share in Two Rivers to a new, empowered platinum entity, ARM Platinum, a division of ARM. The joint venture partners began development of the Two Rivers project in June 2005. The concentrator plant was commissioned early in FY2007 and in FY2008 the mine successfully made the transition from project to operation. Platinum in concentrate production for FY2010 is forecast at 130 000 ounces increasing to 150 000 ounces by FY2013. 2 GEOLOGY Both the Merensky Reef and underlying UG2 Reef occur on the property. The UG2 outcrops in the Klein Dwarsrivier valley over a north-south strike length of 7.5 kilometres and dipping generally to the west at about 10 degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Hans Merensky (16 March 1871 in Botshabelo – 21 October 1952 In
    Hans Merensky (16 March 1871 in Botshabelo – 21 October 1952 in Westfalia near Duiwelskloof) was a German South African geologist, prospector, scientist, conservationist and philanthropist. He discovered the rich deposit of alluvial diamonds at Alexander Bay in Namaqualand, vast platinum and chrome reefs at Lydenburg, Rustenburg and Potgietersrus, which led to some of the largest platinum mines in the world, phosphates and copper at Phalaborwa in the Transvaal lowveld, gold in the Free State and the world’s biggest chrome deposit at Jagdlust near Pietersburg. Hans Merensky was born on March 16, 1871 at Berlin Missionary Society station Botshabelo, near Middelburg in Transvaal, where his father, Alexander Merensky (1837–1918), a noted ethnographer and author, was the resident missionary. Keenly interested in minerals and enjoying outdoor living, he studied mining geology after finishing his schooling in Germany. He was awarded a doctorate in mining geology from the University of Charlottenburg in Berlin. He completed his practical training in coal mines in the Saarland and in Silesia and began work for the Department of Mines in East Prussia. In 1904 he came to South Africa to conduct some geological surveys in the Transvaal. He discovered tin near Pretoria and reported to the Premier Diamond Mine regarding possible mining prospects. He worked for several mining companies and Friedlaender & Co. sent him to Madagascar to investigate a reported discovery of gold, which turned out to be false. He resigned from his job in Germany and moved to Johannesburg where he became a successful consulting geologist. In 1909 he visited the diamond fields of South West Africa and controversially predicted that diamonds would be found along the West coast and south of the Orange River.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium South Africa, in Surficial Uranium Deposits, IAEA-TECDOC- Bearing Quartz-Pebble Conglomerates in 1944-45
    II TKN' INIS-mf~H405 i 15^4 i i.- i \ i /.;:; URANIUM IN SOUTH AFRICA Si--. HIGHLIGHTS OF THE URANIUM INDUSTRY IN SOUTH AFRICA 1888 Sir William Crookes shows radioactivity to be the cause 1970 Formation of the Uranium Enrichment Corporation of of the green fluorescence of minute diamonds recovered from South Africa (UCOR). Witwatersrand gold ores. 1971 Palabora Mining Company becomes the first company to 1923 R A Cooper identifies uraninite in a heavy mineral produce uranium outside the Witwatersrand Basin. concentrate from the City Deep Gold Mine. 1976 Site work started for Koeberg nuclear power station, 1944 W Bourret and F West visit South Africa, as part of the Manhattan Project, to assess the uranium potential of the 1978 Initiation of a project at Valindaba for the commercial Witwatersrand gold reefs. production of enriched uranium. 1946 Dr G Bain, consultant to the Manhattan Project, and Dr C 1979 Commencement of a programme to locate a suitable F Davidson, senior geologist for the British Atomic Energy radioactive waste disposal site. Board, visit South Africa to continue detailed investigations of reefs shown to be uraniferous by the previous sampling. 1980 Peak production of uranium in South Africa — 6 143 t U. 1948 Promulgation of the Atomic Energy Act and establishment 1981 SAFARI-1 fuelled for the first time by fuel elements of the Atomic Energy Board. manufactured from locally enriched uranium. 1949 Pilot plant erected at Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mine to 1983 The Atomic Energy Board becomes the Nuclear Develop- develop a sulphuric-acid leaching process for the extraction of ment Corporation of South Africa (NUCOR) and the Atomic Energy Corporation of South Africa (AEC) is formed to control both NUCOR and UCOR.
    [Show full text]
  • RHODES UNIVERSITY Grahamstown • 6 1 10* South Africa
    RHODES UNIVERSITY Grahamstown • 6 1 10* South Africa Characterization of the distribution of Platinum Group Elements in Sulphide Ores within the Merensky Reef at Modikwa and Two Rivers Platinum Mines, Eastern Bushveld Complex, South Africa By Nosibulelo Julie Zilibokwe A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE (Economic Geology) MSc Exploration Geology Programme Geology Department Rhodes University P.O. Box 94 Grahamstown 6140 South Africa April 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank Almighty God for keeping me healthy and energetic from the start until the end of this journey. This thesis is dedicated to my mother Dorothy Zilibokwe, thank you mama-D for providing me with a sound education. I would like to express my appreciation to my supervisor Dr Napoleon Q. Hammond, now at the University of Limpopo, for your valuable professional guidance, advice and constructive suggestions during the planning and development of this dissertation. Thank you for believing in me Doc. I remain indebted to my manager Dr Stewart Foya at the Council for Geoscience, thank you for permitting me to carry out my studies and for also taking time out of your busy schedule to attend to my queries. You provided great personal guidance, encouragement and support throughout this journey. My gratitude is boundless and I thank you for making this all possible. Special gratitude to my co-supervisor Prof. R.E. “Jock” Harmer in the Geology Department at Rhodes University, for your advice, guidance and valuable support during the writing of this dissertation. Furthermore, I wish to thank the staff of the Geology Department at Rhodes for warmly welcoming me whenever I had any questions or queries.
    [Show full text]