Plant Biosecurity Timeline
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Final Report
Final Report Coordination of Banana Industry R&D (Panama TR4) Project leader: Jim Pekin Delivery partner: Australian Banana Growers’ Council Project code: BA14012 Hort Innovation – Final Report Project: Coordination of Banana Industry R&D (Panama TR4) – BA14012 Disclaimer: Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (Hort Innovation) makes no representations and expressly disclaims all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in this Final Report. Users of this Final Report should take independent action to confirm any information in this Final Report before relying on that information in any way. Reliance on any information provided by Hort Innovation is entirely at your own risk. Hort Innovation is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from Hort Innovation or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non‐use of the Final Report or from reliance on information contained in the Final Report or that Hort Innovation provides to you by any other means. Funding statement: This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower‐owned, not‐for‐profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. Publishing details: ISBN 978 0 7341 4433 1 Published and distributed by: Hort Innovation Level 8 1 Chifley Square -
Biosecurity in Australia: a Working Partnership and Shared Responsibility
Biosecurity in Australia: a working partnership and shared responsibility Dennis Bittisnich Biosecurity Services Group Outline • Australian agriculture in context • Biosecurity control in Australia: a brief background • PPPs in Australian biosecurity: a shared responsibility • Observations: key factors in Australian biosecurity PPPs Australian Agriculture in Context • Geographically isolated; unique flora and fauna; many climatic zones • Political federation of 8 state and territory governments under a commonwealth government • Only 10% land area is arable • 0.3% global population • 3% of global agricultural trade • Beef, wheat, wine, wool, lamb, feed, dairy Australian Agriculture in Context • Historically Australian economy “rode on the sheep’s back”; significant wool, lamb and cereal exporter • Ag nearly 30% of national GDP at peak (now 5% GDP; 60% is exported; 5:1 export:import) • Premium for “clean green” credentials; esp. from favourable animal/plant disease status • Biosecurity threats were thus high on industry, political, and trade agenda Australian Agriculture in Context • In last 10-15 years: exports levelled off; drought & international competition • Agri-food imports doubled; mostly from developing countries • International passengers and cargo doubled - globalization • Emerging/altered spread of disease • ALSO: Trading partner requirements/SPS disciplines more rigorously applied Biosecurity control in Australia • Historically public management of biosecurity (also food safety; ag R&D) seen as a government “public good” (beneficiaries -
APPS Newsletter Vol 27, No. 3 December 2014 in This Edition
APPS Newsletter Vol 27, No. 3 December 2014 In this edition: Page 2. President’s message Page 3. News from the Business Manager Page 4. New members Page 4. Dates for your Diary Page 5. Regional news from New South Wales Page 8. Regional news from Victoria Page 10. Regional news from Tasmania Page 11. Report on the 8th Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium Page 15. Report on the 11th Australasian Plant Virology Workshop APPS NEWS is the official newsletter of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society, published electronically 3 times per year. Items for inclusion should be sent to: Dr Will Cuddy, Plant Breeding Institute, University of Sydney, Private Mail Bag 4011, Narellan, NSW, 2567. Ph. 02 9351 8871, Email: [email protected] Next deadline: March 31 2015 Web Site: http://www.australasianplantpathologysociety.org.au/ 1 APPS December 2014 Vol 27 No. 3 President’s Message 2014 seems to have gone by very quickly. The Management Committee is busy preparing for the upcoming Annual General Meeting, to be held on Thursday 11 December 2014. By the time you receive this newsletter, the AGM will be over, so I hope you were able to take up the invitation to join the meeting and contribute to the running of our Society. Progress towards the goals outlined in the 2-year plan has been documented in the President’s report prepared for the AGM (see http://www.appsnet.org/members/General/AGM%202014/index.aspx). When you next visit the APPS website I hope you will appreciate the improvements implemented by the Business Manager, Peter Williamson, to make the website more user-friendly. -
Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow Et Al
Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow et al. Australasian Agribusiness Perspectives 2017, Volume 20, Paper 8 ISSN: 1442-6951 Biosecurity in Australia: An Assessment of the Current Funding Approach Ruth Ahchowa, Garry Griffithb and Susan Hesterc * a Former postgraduate student, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Director, Economics, Regulation and Policy, EY, Melbourne. b Principal Fellow, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Professorial Research Fellow, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale. c Senior Research Fellow, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale; and Chief Investigator, Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract Australian governments and industries have limited resources to tackle established pests and diseases and to prevent new incursions. As the biosecurity threats to Australia’s economy, environment and society change, it is important that the funding and governance of responses are appropriately aligned and resourced. Key decisions concern which biosecurity threats will receive funding, how much funding they will receive, and who will be responsible for providing the funding. In this paper we review the current national approach to biosecurity funding, and a high level assessment is made against economic and public policy principles for allocation of resources to biosecurity. The review finds that the primary assessment for determining funding of national biosecurity response is benefit-cost analysis. However, benefit-cost analysis is often restricted to providing a net benefit of responding to one plant or animal pest or disease. The conclusion is that an approach which considers a portfolio of pests and diseases may be more appropriate in a limited resource environment. -
Characterisation and Management of Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon
Characterisation and management of Fusarium wilt of watermelon Dr Lucy Tran-Nguyen Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries Project Number: VM12001 Authors: Lucy Tran-Nguyen Cassie McMaster 1 VM12001 Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (HIA Ltd) and the Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries make no representations and expressly disclaim all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in this Final Report. Users of this Final Report should take independent action to confirm any information in this Final Report before relying on that information in any way. Reliance on any information provided by HIA Ltd is entirely at your own risk. HIA Ltd is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from HIA Ltd or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non-use of the Final Report or from reliance on information contained in the Final Report or that HIA Ltd provides to you by any other means. R&D projects: co-investment funding This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited with co-investment from Monsanto Australia and Rijk Zwaan Australia Pty. Ltd and funds from the Australian Government. ISBN 978 0 7341 4359 4 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Innovation Australia Ltd Level 8 1 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright -
Biosecurity and Quarantine Arrangements
Biosecurity and quarantine arrangements Senate Inquiry – August 2010 Contents 1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 2 Terms of Reference...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The adequacy of current biosecurity and quarantine arrangements, including resourcing 3 2.2 Projected demand and resourcing requirements ....................................................... 5 2.3 Progress in implementation of the ‘Beale Review’ recommendations and their place in meeting projected biosecurity demand and resourcing ......................................................... 6 2.4 Any related matters ............................................................................................. 9 Biosecurity and quarantine arrangements 2 Senate Inquiry – August 2010 1 Summary The Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity (CRCNPB) started operating in November 2005 in recognition of the need to strengthen the plant biosecurity scientific capacity of Australia. The CRCNPB coordinates plant biosecurity research across all Australian states and territories and has an extensive collaborative network of researchers and educators from 24 participating organisations representing industry, universities, state and Australian governments. A key strength of the CRCNPB is the involvement of its participants who are, in many cases, end- users of research results. This ensures maximum benefit -
Plant Biosecurity in Australia
Proceedings VII World Avocado Congress 2011 (Actas VII Congreso Mundial del Aguacate 2011). Cairns, Australia. 5 – 9 September 2011 Plant biosecurity in Australia – a powerful government–industry partnership Greg Fraser Plant Health Australia Abstract The ability of governments and industries to work together and share responsibility for designing and managing the plant biosecurity system in Australia has been a crucial development over the last 15 years. Plant Health Australia (PHA) was established in 2000 as a not-for-profit company to breathe life into this partnership and support its strengthening and expansion over time. The model’s success has enabled a wide range of nationally significant challenges to be addressed and agreements to be put in place to deliver improved biosecurity outcomes. While the partnership continues to evolve there are lessons to be drawn from the experience of Australia and the potential for transfer of the approach to other countries. PHA, as the national coordinating body for plant biosecurity in Australia, services the needs of its government and industry members and acts as an independent advocate for the national plant biosecurity system. The company’s efforts help minimise new plant pest impacts, enhance Australia’s plant biosecurity status, assist trade and market access for Australia’s plant products, safeguard the livelihood of producers, support the sustainability and profitability of plant industries and the communities that rely upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. Key words Plant, biosecurity, Australia, government, industry, partnership, national Introduction Australia, in plant biosecurity terms, is the lucky country. Natural geographic isolation and a strong focus on biosecurity have ensured that Australia remains free from many plant pests that adversely affect agriculture, horticulture and forestry in other parts of the world. -
The Future of Biosecurity in Australia
Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 152, part 1, 2019, pp. 121–128. ISSN 0035-9173/19/010121-08 The future of biosecurity in Australia Eddie Holmes Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, and School of Life & Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney E-mail: [email protected] was assigned the task of talking about If it had come here, who knows what would I biosecurity, and biosecurity, it turns out, have happened. SARS was a major warning is an extremely broad term that can be used shock. in a wide variety of ways so I’m just going to At the same time as these human out- use it in the context of, as Brian notes, infec- breaks, our cultural systems face a very major tious diseases, particularly on what Australia threat too. Exactly at the same time as SARS, may need to do to prevent and respond to in the Netherlands there was an outbreak future epidemics. (which I’m sure you haven’t heard about) of H7N7 influenza, a very nasty, highly viru- SARS and other ’flu-like respiratory lent H7 strain of avian ’flu. This was com- viruses pletely concurrent with the SARS outbreak. If you wind the clock back just a few years, The Dutch authorities were so scared about you all remember the SARS outbreak of this that they basically went through a mass 2003. The numbers of people infected were culling operation of chickens in Holland to not actually that great: overall globally about eliminate the virus. -
Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers
Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers A guide to farm biosecurity measures to reduce the risks of weeds, pests and diseases impacting production Version 1.0 January 2017 © Plant Health Australia Limited 2017 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has Plant Health Australia (PHA) is the national been provided by other contributors, in which case coordinator of the government-industry partnership copyright may be owned by another person. With for plant biosecurity in Australia. As a not-for-profit the exception of any material protected by a trade company, PHA services the needs of Members and mark and except where otherwise indicated in independently advocates on behalf of the national this publication, this publication is licensed under plant biosecurity system. a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as PHA’s efforts help minimise plant pest impacts, authorised under this licence or copyright enhance Australia’s plant health status, assist trade, law, is prohibited. safeguard the livelihood of producers, support the creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ sustainability and profitability of plant industries and the communities that rely upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. planthealthaustralia.com.au This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit CANEGROWERS is the peak body for Australian to Plant Health Australia (as below). sugarcane growers. CANEGROWERS Australia In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: represents around 80% of Australia’s sugarcane Plant Health Australia Ltd (2017) Biosecurity Manual growers. -
Biosecurity Program
2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 Background ........................................................................................................................... 5 Drivers of Change .................................................................................................................. 6 National Bee Biosecurity Program ............................................................................................ 8 Aim ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 10 Code of Practice ...................................................................................................................... 10 Expected Outcomes and Benefits ........................................................................................... 11 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 12 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................... 12 National Management and Governance ................................................................................... 13 Bee Biosecurity Program Steering Committee ......................................................................... -
Australian Bananas Magazine
Australian BananasIssue 40, Summer 2013-2014 Hopeful harvest Trial blocks yield answers in the search for disease-resistant varieties Page 10 Banana Page 20 Page 22 China- Freckle eradication Retail campaign Philippines study tour editorial & advertising AUSTRALIAN Rhyll Cronin 07 3278 4786 [email protected] art direction & design ToadShow Bananas Summer 2013-2014 2 Eton Street,Toowong contents 07 3335 4000 www.toadshow.com.au publisher Regulars Australian Banana 4 Chairman’s comment Growers’ Council Inc. 5 CEO’s comment ABN: 60 381 740 734 20 Marketing – Campaign puts a smile on chief executive officer retailers’ faces Jim Pekin 38 Health – Is rating food a five-star idea? research and 39 Membership – ABGC Juliane development manager 25 PAGE Henderson Jay Anderson 12 Industry news & MeeHua Wong office manager Alix Perry 6 Regional round up administration assistant 7 Banana grower AGM discusses industry Industry development sustainability Kaylar Packer 16 Lessons from the Philippines 8 Have your say on draft industry plan BOARD OF DIRECTORS Warnings for growers from a look at TR4 in the Philippines chairman Plant health Doug Phillips 22 Tour highlights threats, opportunities 9 Committee guides our six million dollar A group studies production in China and vice-chairman plan the Philippines Adrian Crema 28 PAGE The six-member team guiding the Banana 39 Robert Mayers in reef-grants role treasurer Plant Protection Program (BPPP) ABGC’s new Reef Water Quality Grants Paul Johnston Officer directors Features Marc Darveniza 10 Taking -
Market Access of Papua New Guinea Bananas (Musa Spp.) with Particular Respect to Banana Fly (Bactrocera Musae (Tryon)) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Market Access of Papua New Guinea Bananas (Musa spp.) with Particular Respect to Banana Fly (Bactrocera musae (Tryon)) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Amanda Mararuai B.Sc Agriculture, Graduate Diploma in Applied Science A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Natural Resource Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia April 2010 Keywords Bactrocera musae, banana fly, bananas, biosecurity, host availability, invasion biology, invasive, market access, Musa spp., novel environment, Papua New Guinea, pest risk analysis, population distribution ii Abstract International market access for fresh commodities is regulated by international accepted phytosanitary guidelines, the objectives of which are to reduce the biosecurity risk of plant pest and disease movement. Papua New Guinea (PNG) has identified banana as a potential export crop and to help meet international market access requirements, this thesis provides information for the development of a pest risk analysis (PRA) for PNG banana fruit. The PRA is a three step process which first identifies the pests associated with a particular commodity or pathway, then assesses the risk associated with those pests, and finally identifies risk management options for those pests if required. As the first step of the PRA process, I collated a definitive list on the organisms associated with the banana plant in PNG using formal literature, structured interviews with local experts, grey literature and unpublished file material held in PNG field research stations. I identified 112 organisms (invertebrates, vertebrate, pathogens and weeds) associated with banana in PNG, but only 14 of these were reported as commonly requiring management. For these 14 I present detailed information summaries on their known biology and pest impact.