Plant Biosecurity Timeline

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Biosecurity Timeline PLANT BIOSECURITY IN AUSTRALIA A timeline of plant biosecurity events pre 1900s. Pre 1900s William Farrer joins the New For over 60,000 years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people undertook many agricultural and land management South Wales Department of practices, e.g. fire, while maintaining soil fertility. It is Agriculture with an aim to estimated they used around 5,000 species of food, including South Australia legislates the Vines Protection produce wheat varieties that will tubers such as yams, grain such as native millet, macadamia be rust-resistant, have a higher nuts, fruits and berries. In order to manage pests, they utilised Act 1874 and bans movement of vine cuttings protein content and better milling techniques such as the burning of leaves to repel insects and and rooted vines allowing them to remain free Vineyards in Geelong, fire to maintain species diversity in the landscape of the sap-sucking insects known as phylloxera Victoria are uprooted to and baking quality 1874 manage the outbreak of 1898 phylloxera Stem rust, a devastating wheat disease, 1882 forces farmers to grow wheat inland 1840 where it is drier and hotter 1860 1788 1845 1877 1884 1890 The first wheat is The first shipments of Phylloxera spreads Colonial governments sown in Australia Following the first reported north to New South Australian grown wheat are sighting of the insect in 1875, establish a series of The First Fleet Wales after it is exported to England phylloxera is positively annual national brings orange, detected in Camden identified in Australia in conferences to address lime and lemon 1839 Geelong, Victoria after how best to fight wheat seeds to New infested grapevine planting stem rust South Wales Prickly pear is introduced material is imported from into Australia for use as a Europe 1889 natural agricultural fence A severe rust epidemic costs the 1886 wheat industry £2-3 From 1886 to 1929, rabbit barrier million in lost 1859 and check fences are erected in production 13 European wild rabbits are released Queensland. The total length of onto an estate in Victoria so they can be government, board and private hunted for sport. Rabbits go on to cause fences constructed was 47,404 km millions of dollars of crop damage PLANT BIOSECURITY IN AUSTRALIA A timeline of plant biosecurity events during 1900s-1920s. 1900s-1920s 1903 Distribution of William Farrer's 1912 Federation wheat begins. It is a 1906 Citrus canker is recorded for the first rust-resistant, high-yielding, State Premiers agree to hand over time in the Northern Territory strong straw plant administration of quarantine to the Citrus canker is eradicated from the Commonwealth. This change is Northern Territory included in Australia's Constitution, 1922 allowing each state to manage domestic trade, and the Commonwealth to manage the international border 1910 Phylloxera spreads further 1917 1901-1907 north to Queensland First recording of skeleton A rabbit proof fence is built. It extends weed. It subsequently 3,256 km north to south across Western 1909 spreads throughout the Australia The Quarantine Act 1908 south-eastern Australian comes into force wheat belt, dramatically reducing yields and The Federal Quarantine increasing production costs Service is established 1920 1926 Prickly pear covers 24 million Cactoblastis moth is ha of land in Queensland and released as a New South Wales biological control 1915 agent for prickly 1908 An Australian Wheat Board is created under the War pear plants The Quarantine Act 1908 receives royal assent. Precautions Act 1914 to administer a wheat pooling The Act provided a national approach to system, which is designed to assist wheat growers and quarantine ensure appropriate management of food during World The Commonwealth Quarantine Service comes War I. It comprises the Prime Minister and a minister into operation and takes over quarantine from each wheat growing state stations in every Australian state PLANT BIOSECURITY IN AUSTRALIA A timeline of plant biosecurity events during 1930s-1960s. 1930s-1960s The International Plant Protection Australia leads the development of quarantine procedures for cargo 1935 Convention is established. Australia is a part of it containers, which are distributed Australia introduces a internationally consolidated set of plant 1952 1968 quarantine regulations, made under the Quarantine Act 1908 The Plant Quarantine Research Station is established within Yarralumla nursery, Australian Capital Territory. It is later moved to Weston Creek, Australian Capital Territory 1965 1950 The myxoma virus is 1967 released to introduce CSIRO commences imports myxomatosis disease of of 55 species of dung beetles 1933 rabbits for release in Australia. Their Prickly pear numbers introduction has had a dramatically reduce positive impact on following the release of 1956 sustainable agriculture Cactoblastis moth in The Asia and Pacific Plant 1926 Protection Commission is Last record of phylloxera in established. Australia is a Queensland in suburban member Brisbane 1969 1937 The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (now known as the CSIRO) uses The Quarantine Facility for wheat The first commercial crops of canola are grown in Wardang Island, South Australia to conduct the variety importations is established at Australia. Farmers were seeking alternative crops first field trials of the myxoma virus that causes Tamworth, New South Wales to reduce their dependence on cereals. However, myxomatosis disease in rabbits blackleg, a fungal disease, quickly became a serious problem for canola farmers PLANT BIOSECURITY IN AUSTRALIA A timeline of plant biosecurity events during 1970s-1980s. 1970s-1980s The Northern Australian Quarantine Strategy (NAQS) is established by AQIS to monitor the presence of target pests and diseases not present The rust fungus, Puccinia The Standing Committee on in Australia but found in countries only several kilometres north of chondrillina, is introduced as a Agriculture establishes the first Australia, including exotic fruit flies, Chromolaena and black Sigatoka formal arrangements between biological control agent for 1989 skeleton weed Commonwealth and States for 1971 dealing with exotic pest incursions The review, Australian Quarantine 1976 Requirements for the Future, by New blackleg resistant varieties of canola are released Professor David Lindsay is released allowing farmers to grow high yields of canola 1988 1978-1987 1989 1980 Moko, a serious bacterial 1975 Quarantine policy and disease of bananas, is A northern surveillance detected in Cairns on 1978 procedures are developed program, primarily for exotic for the importation of tissue heliconia plants imported 1970 Computers are used for fruit flies, is established culture planting material from Hawaii. It has since Victoria sets up the first the first time by plant through cooperation between been eradicated canola breeding program, quarantine Western Australia, Northern Giant African snail, one of with one of the initial Potato cyst nematode is Territory, Queensland and the the most destructive pests to objectives being the eradicated from Western Commonwealth fruit, vegetables and native development of blackleg forests, is eradicated from Australia 1979 resistant varieties Gordonvale in far north 1977 The first Plant Queensland The giant African snail is Quarantine Officer 1986 detected in Gordonvale, is appointed to The Australian Quarantine and Inspection Queensland Thursday Island, Service (AQIS) is established to be responsible Queensland 1982 for animal, pest and plant quarantine, as well 1973 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research as border control Western Australia and (ACIAR) is established. ACIAR organises and funds research by Potato cyst nematode is first detected in New South Wales Australian and overseas researchers in developing countries in Western Australia establish canola breeding the Indo-Pacific region on livestock, cropping, horticulture, programs fisheries, forestry, land, water and climate issues PLANT BIOSECURITY IN AUSTRALIA A timeline of plant biosecurity events during 1990s. 1996 1990s Rabbits are estimated to cost at least $600 X-ray technology is trialled for 1998 screening of international million annually in lost agricultural production ACIAR funds projects evaluating the resistance of different banana cultivars to Panama passenger baggage at Cairns Australia Quarantine - a shared The public awareness Disease Tropical Race 4 (TR4). Disease-tolerant cultivars that had allowed banana Airport responsibility (the Nairn Report) is campaign, Quarantine Matters!, cultivation to continue in Taiwan are introduced as a stop-gap measure, enabling established to review and make is launched to educate the Market access to the USA for Indonesian farmers to continue some production. Despite researchers' best efforts, TR4 recommendations on Australia's animal Australian community and Australian citrus from the Fruit Fly continued to spread throughout Asia. However, this research would later inform the and plant quarantine policies and international travellers about Pest Free Areas of the Riverina and containment of TR4 in Australia programs quarantine Sunraysia is gained. It is supported by Chromolaena is detected in far north Queensland. A the Queensland Fruit Fly Code of The Torres Strait Fruit Fly Technical Advisory Citrus canker is detected in the Black Sigatoka is detected at long term, nationally funded eradication campaign is Practice Panel (TAP) is established, including Northern
Recommended publications
  • Final Report
    Final Report Coordination of Banana Industry R&D (Panama TR4) Project leader: Jim Pekin Delivery partner: Australian Banana Growers’ Council Project code: BA14012 Hort Innovation – Final Report Project: Coordination of Banana Industry R&D (Panama TR4) – BA14012 Disclaimer: Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (Hort Innovation) makes no representations and expressly disclaims all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in this Final Report. Users of this Final Report should take independent action to confirm any information in this Final Report before relying on that information in any way. Reliance on any information provided by Hort Innovation is entirely at your own risk. Hort Innovation is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from Hort Innovation or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non‐use of the Final Report or from reliance on information contained in the Final Report or that Hort Innovation provides to you by any other means. Funding statement: This project has been funded by Hort Innovation, using the banana research and development levy and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower‐owned, not‐for‐profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. Publishing details: ISBN 978 0 7341 4433 1 Published and distributed by: Hort Innovation Level 8 1 Chifley Square
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity in Australia: a Working Partnership and Shared Responsibility
    Biosecurity in Australia: a working partnership and shared responsibility Dennis Bittisnich Biosecurity Services Group Outline • Australian agriculture in context • Biosecurity control in Australia: a brief background • PPPs in Australian biosecurity: a shared responsibility • Observations: key factors in Australian biosecurity PPPs Australian Agriculture in Context • Geographically isolated; unique flora and fauna; many climatic zones • Political federation of 8 state and territory governments under a commonwealth government • Only 10% land area is arable • 0.3% global population • 3% of global agricultural trade • Beef, wheat, wine, wool, lamb, feed, dairy Australian Agriculture in Context • Historically Australian economy “rode on the sheep’s back”; significant wool, lamb and cereal exporter • Ag nearly 30% of national GDP at peak (now 5% GDP; 60% is exported; 5:1 export:import) • Premium for “clean green” credentials; esp. from favourable animal/plant disease status • Biosecurity threats were thus high on industry, political, and trade agenda Australian Agriculture in Context • In last 10-15 years: exports levelled off; drought & international competition • Agri-food imports doubled; mostly from developing countries • International passengers and cargo doubled - globalization • Emerging/altered spread of disease • ALSO: Trading partner requirements/SPS disciplines more rigorously applied Biosecurity control in Australia • Historically public management of biosecurity (also food safety; ag R&D) seen as a government “public good” (beneficiaries
    [Show full text]
  • APPS Newsletter Vol 27, No. 3 December 2014 in This Edition
    APPS Newsletter Vol 27, No. 3 December 2014 In this edition: Page 2. President’s message Page 3. News from the Business Manager Page 4. New members Page 4. Dates for your Diary Page 5. Regional news from New South Wales Page 8. Regional news from Victoria Page 10. Regional news from Tasmania Page 11. Report on the 8th Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium Page 15. Report on the 11th Australasian Plant Virology Workshop APPS NEWS is the official newsletter of the Australasian Plant Pathology Society, published electronically 3 times per year. Items for inclusion should be sent to: Dr Will Cuddy, Plant Breeding Institute, University of Sydney, Private Mail Bag 4011, Narellan, NSW, 2567. Ph. 02 9351 8871, Email: [email protected] Next deadline: March 31 2015 Web Site: http://www.australasianplantpathologysociety.org.au/ 1 APPS December 2014 Vol 27 No. 3 President’s Message 2014 seems to have gone by very quickly. The Management Committee is busy preparing for the upcoming Annual General Meeting, to be held on Thursday 11 December 2014. By the time you receive this newsletter, the AGM will be over, so I hope you were able to take up the invitation to join the meeting and contribute to the running of our Society. Progress towards the goals outlined in the 2-year plan has been documented in the President’s report prepared for the AGM (see http://www.appsnet.org/members/General/AGM%202014/index.aspx). When you next visit the APPS website I hope you will appreciate the improvements implemented by the Business Manager, Peter Williamson, to make the website more user-friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow Et Al
    Australian Biosecurity Funding Approaches Ahchow et al. Australasian Agribusiness Perspectives 2017, Volume 20, Paper 8 ISSN: 1442-6951 Biosecurity in Australia: An Assessment of the Current Funding Approach Ruth Ahchowa, Garry Griffithb and Susan Hesterc * a Former postgraduate student, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Director, Economics, Regulation and Policy, EY, Melbourne. b Principal Fellow, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville; and Professorial Research Fellow, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale. c Senior Research Fellow, UNE Business School, University of New England, Armidale; and Chief Investigator, Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract Australian governments and industries have limited resources to tackle established pests and diseases and to prevent new incursions. As the biosecurity threats to Australia’s economy, environment and society change, it is important that the funding and governance of responses are appropriately aligned and resourced. Key decisions concern which biosecurity threats will receive funding, how much funding they will receive, and who will be responsible for providing the funding. In this paper we review the current national approach to biosecurity funding, and a high level assessment is made against economic and public policy principles for allocation of resources to biosecurity. The review finds that the primary assessment for determining funding of national biosecurity response is benefit-cost analysis. However, benefit-cost analysis is often restricted to providing a net benefit of responding to one plant or animal pest or disease. The conclusion is that an approach which considers a portfolio of pests and diseases may be more appropriate in a limited resource environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation and Management of Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon
    Characterisation and management of Fusarium wilt of watermelon Dr Lucy Tran-Nguyen Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries Project Number: VM12001 Authors: Lucy Tran-Nguyen Cassie McMaster 1 VM12001 Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (HIA Ltd) and the Northern Territory Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries make no representations and expressly disclaim all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in this Final Report. Users of this Final Report should take independent action to confirm any information in this Final Report before relying on that information in any way. Reliance on any information provided by HIA Ltd is entirely at your own risk. HIA Ltd is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from HIA Ltd or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non-use of the Final Report or from reliance on information contained in the Final Report or that HIA Ltd provides to you by any other means. R&D projects: co-investment funding This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited with co-investment from Monsanto Australia and Rijk Zwaan Australia Pty. Ltd and funds from the Australian Government. ISBN 978 0 7341 4359 4 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Innovation Australia Ltd Level 8 1 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity and Quarantine Arrangements
    Biosecurity and quarantine arrangements Senate Inquiry – August 2010 Contents 1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 2 Terms of Reference...................................................................................................... 3 2.1 The adequacy of current biosecurity and quarantine arrangements, including resourcing 3 2.2 Projected demand and resourcing requirements ....................................................... 5 2.3 Progress in implementation of the ‘Beale Review’ recommendations and their place in meeting projected biosecurity demand and resourcing ......................................................... 6 2.4 Any related matters ............................................................................................. 9 Biosecurity and quarantine arrangements 2 Senate Inquiry – August 2010 1 Summary The Cooperative Research Centre for National Plant Biosecurity (CRCNPB) started operating in November 2005 in recognition of the need to strengthen the plant biosecurity scientific capacity of Australia. The CRCNPB coordinates plant biosecurity research across all Australian states and territories and has an extensive collaborative network of researchers and educators from 24 participating organisations representing industry, universities, state and Australian governments. A key strength of the CRCNPB is the involvement of its participants who are, in many cases, end- users of research results. This ensures maximum benefit
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Biosecurity in Australia
    Proceedings VII World Avocado Congress 2011 (Actas VII Congreso Mundial del Aguacate 2011). Cairns, Australia. 5 – 9 September 2011 Plant biosecurity in Australia – a powerful government–industry partnership Greg Fraser Plant Health Australia Abstract The ability of governments and industries to work together and share responsibility for designing and managing the plant biosecurity system in Australia has been a crucial development over the last 15 years. Plant Health Australia (PHA) was established in 2000 as a not-for-profit company to breathe life into this partnership and support its strengthening and expansion over time. The model’s success has enabled a wide range of nationally significant challenges to be addressed and agreements to be put in place to deliver improved biosecurity outcomes. While the partnership continues to evolve there are lessons to be drawn from the experience of Australia and the potential for transfer of the approach to other countries. PHA, as the national coordinating body for plant biosecurity in Australia, services the needs of its government and industry members and acts as an independent advocate for the national plant biosecurity system. The company’s efforts help minimise new plant pest impacts, enhance Australia’s plant biosecurity status, assist trade and market access for Australia’s plant products, safeguard the livelihood of producers, support the sustainability and profitability of plant industries and the communities that rely upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. Key words Plant, biosecurity, Australia, government, industry, partnership, national Introduction Australia, in plant biosecurity terms, is the lucky country. Natural geographic isolation and a strong focus on biosecurity have ensured that Australia remains free from many plant pests that adversely affect agriculture, horticulture and forestry in other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Biosecurity in Australia
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 152, part 1, 2019, pp. 121–128. ISSN 0035-9173/19/010121-08 The future of biosecurity in Australia Eddie Holmes Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, Charles Perkins Centre, and School of Life & Environmental Sciences and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney E-mail: [email protected] was assigned the task of talking about If it had come here, who knows what would I biosecurity, and biosecurity, it turns out, have happened. SARS was a major warning is an extremely broad term that can be used shock. in a wide variety of ways so I’m just going to At the same time as these human out- use it in the context of, as Brian notes, infec- breaks, our cultural systems face a very major tious diseases, particularly on what Australia threat too. Exactly at the same time as SARS, may need to do to prevent and respond to in the Netherlands there was an outbreak future epidemics. (which I’m sure you haven’t heard about) of H7N7 influenza, a very nasty, highly viru- SARS and other ’flu-like respiratory lent H7 strain of avian ’flu. This was com- viruses pletely concurrent with the SARS outbreak. If you wind the clock back just a few years, The Dutch authorities were so scared about you all remember the SARS outbreak of this that they basically went through a mass 2003. The numbers of people infected were culling operation of chickens in Holland to not actually that great: overall globally about eliminate the virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers
    Biosecurity Manual for Sugarcane Producers A guide to farm biosecurity measures to reduce the risks of weeds, pests and diseases impacting production Version 1.0 January 2017 © Plant Health Australia Limited 2017 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has Plant Health Australia (PHA) is the national been provided by other contributors, in which case coordinator of the government-industry partnership copyright may be owned by another person. With for plant biosecurity in Australia. As a not-for-profit the exception of any material protected by a trade company, PHA services the needs of Members and mark and except where otherwise indicated in independently advocates on behalf of the national this publication, this publication is licensed under plant biosecurity system. a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as PHA’s efforts help minimise plant pest impacts, authorised under this licence or copyright enhance Australia’s plant health status, assist trade, law, is prohibited. safeguard the livelihood of producers, support the creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ sustainability and profitability of plant industries and the communities that rely upon them, and preserve environmental health and amenity. planthealthaustralia.com.au This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit CANEGROWERS is the peak body for Australian to Plant Health Australia (as below). sugarcane growers. CANEGROWERS Australia In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: represents around 80% of Australia’s sugarcane Plant Health Australia Ltd (2017) Biosecurity Manual growers.
    [Show full text]
  • Biosecurity Program
    2 Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 Background ........................................................................................................................... 5 Drivers of Change .................................................................................................................. 6 National Bee Biosecurity Program ............................................................................................ 8 Aim ......................................................................................................................................... 9 Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 10 Code of Practice ...................................................................................................................... 10 Expected Outcomes and Benefits ........................................................................................... 11 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 12 Stakeholders ....................................................................................................................... 12 National Management and Governance ................................................................................... 13 Bee Biosecurity Program Steering Committee .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Bananas Magazine
    Australian BananasIssue 40, Summer 2013-2014 Hopeful harvest Trial blocks yield answers in the search for disease-resistant varieties Page 10 Banana Page 20 Page 22 China- Freckle eradication Retail campaign Philippines study tour editorial & advertising AUSTRALIAN Rhyll Cronin 07 3278 4786 [email protected] art direction & design ToadShow Bananas Summer 2013-2014 2 Eton Street,Toowong contents 07 3335 4000 www.toadshow.com.au publisher Regulars Australian Banana 4 Chairman’s comment Growers’ Council Inc. 5 CEO’s comment ABN: 60 381 740 734 20 Marketing – Campaign puts a smile on chief executive officer retailers’ faces Jim Pekin 38 Health – Is rating food a five-star idea? research and 39 Membership – ABGC Juliane development manager 25 PAGE Henderson Jay Anderson 12 Industry news & MeeHua Wong office manager Alix Perry 6 Regional round up administration assistant 7 Banana grower AGM discusses industry Industry development sustainability Kaylar Packer 16 Lessons from the Philippines 8 Have your say on draft industry plan BOARD OF DIRECTORS Warnings for growers from a look at TR4 in the Philippines chairman Plant health Doug Phillips 22 Tour highlights threats, opportunities 9 Committee guides our six million dollar A group studies production in China and vice-chairman plan the Philippines Adrian Crema 28 PAGE The six-member team guiding the Banana 39 Robert Mayers in reef-grants role treasurer Plant Protection Program (BPPP) ABGC’s new Reef Water Quality Grants Paul Johnston Officer directors Features Marc Darveniza 10 Taking
    [Show full text]
  • Market Access of Papua New Guinea Bananas (Musa Spp.) with Particular Respect to Banana Fly (Bactrocera Musae (Tryon)) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
    Market Access of Papua New Guinea Bananas (Musa spp.) with Particular Respect to Banana Fly (Bactrocera musae (Tryon)) (Diptera: Tephritidae) Amanda Mararuai B.Sc Agriculture, Graduate Diploma in Applied Science A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Natural Resource Sciences Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia April 2010 Keywords Bactrocera musae, banana fly, bananas, biosecurity, host availability, invasion biology, invasive, market access, Musa spp., novel environment, Papua New Guinea, pest risk analysis, population distribution ii Abstract International market access for fresh commodities is regulated by international accepted phytosanitary guidelines, the objectives of which are to reduce the biosecurity risk of plant pest and disease movement. Papua New Guinea (PNG) has identified banana as a potential export crop and to help meet international market access requirements, this thesis provides information for the development of a pest risk analysis (PRA) for PNG banana fruit. The PRA is a three step process which first identifies the pests associated with a particular commodity or pathway, then assesses the risk associated with those pests, and finally identifies risk management options for those pests if required. As the first step of the PRA process, I collated a definitive list on the organisms associated with the banana plant in PNG using formal literature, structured interviews with local experts, grey literature and unpublished file material held in PNG field research stations. I identified 112 organisms (invertebrates, vertebrate, pathogens and weeds) associated with banana in PNG, but only 14 of these were reported as commonly requiring management. For these 14 I present detailed information summaries on their known biology and pest impact.
    [Show full text]