The Open Banking Standard

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Open Banking Standard The Open Banking Standard Unlocking the potential of open banking to improve competition, efficiency and stimulate innovation CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary............................................................................................................3 2. Introduction.........................................................................................................................8 3. Foundations......................................................................................................................11 4. Opportunities and Challenges..........................................................................................14 5. Scope of Data...................................................................................................................17 6. Customer Benefits............................................................................................................20 7. The Open Banking Framework.........................................................................................24 7a. Standards.......................................................................................................................25 7b. Developer Resources.....................................................................................................37 7c. Security...........................................................................................................................41 7d. Governance....................................................................................................................55 8. Regulatory and Legal Considerations...............................................................................64 9. Implementation Plan.........................................................................................................76 Appendices...........................................................................................................................81 Glossary.............................................................................................................................143 Acknowledgements............................................................................................................147 1. Executive Summary Context In the 2015 Budget HM Treasury announced its commitment to delivering an open standard for Application Programming Interfaces in UK banking, to help customers have more control over their data and to make it easier for financial technology companies (FinTechs) or other businesses to make use of bank data on behalf of customers in a variety of helpful and innovative ways. The Government explained that this could help to drive more competition in banking to improve outcomes for customers, and further support the UK’s world-leading FinTech industry. In summer of last year, at the request of the Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Harriett Baldwin MP, the Open Banking Working Group (OBWG) was established to take forward this work. Their objective was to produce a detailed framework for how an Open Banking Standard could be designed and delivered, with a timetable for achieving this. The OBWG comprised industry experts from banking, open data, and consumer and business communities to ensure a diverse range of expert views are represented. This report is the OBWG’s detailed framework for delivering an Open Banking Standard in the UK. Leadership in this area will set precedents across many sectors; a strong data infrastructure will be as important to the UK’s economy today, as roads have been to our success in the industrial economy for over a century. Banking as a service has long sat at the heart of the economy because of the need to seamlessly and efficiently connect different economic agents who are buying and selling goods and services. The need for that ease of connectivity only increases in a digitally enabled economy, and the capabilities that underpin it necessitate that connections be made in very different ways. Trust will remain the single most important factor in determining how those different means of connecting will be made beneficial. Our challenge has been to determine how best to enable high security (a critical foundation to building and maintaining trust) while not impeding development in a rapidly changing world. The European Union is rapidly advancing legislation that will, upon implementation in the next two years, require UK banks (subject to consent from individuals and businesses) to open access to their customer data and payments capabilities. The UK has diligently fostered a vibrant financial technology environment and stands ready to reap the benefits of that legislation sooner than many other markets. Other markets (in the EU and beyond) have begun to implement aspects of an open banking standard, but none have produced a definitive outline of such a standard, let alone a roadmap for its implementation. There is, therefore, a significant opportunity for the UK economy if we take a lead in this space. This will require that we invest rigorously in development over the next 6-12 months. Open Banking Standard Our goal in publishing this Framework today is to enable the accelerated building of an Open Banking Standard in the UK. It has been developed based on input from an expert group drawn from the banking, FinTech and data communities, building on preliminary work by HM Treasury in the first half of 2015. At its core, the Framework represents a set of foundational recommendations that are intended to allow the process of building the Open Banking Standard to commence immediately. Those recommendations include a broad implementation plan, covering three distinct phases over the course of the next three years. The implementation plan will, by necessity, need to be flexible over the coming years – both because lessons will be learned as implementation gets underway and because the technology and standards on which it will rely will continue to evolve at a rapid rate in ways that are impossible to anticipate today. Execution of the plan, along with maintenance of the emerging standard itself, will require careful stewardship. Clear and consistent communications will be required to continuously build awareness, understanding and adoption not just with service developers, but also with the individuals and businesses that will benefit. This latter point is fundamental. Our aim in constructing this framework in the way that we have was to ensure that such an open standard provides the highest quality of service for individuals and businesses, that increases competitiveness, improves efficiency and stimulates innovation. This standard will only be as good as the trust that all of the participants required to make it successful have in it; that will ultimately rely on the trust of individuals and businesses. Fundamental importance of data literacy Our work in constructing this framework, as well as more advanced work in other sectors, has repeatedly highlighted the fundamental role of data literacy in supporting the creation of any open data standards. We must align on a common vocabulary – one that cuts across sectors, even if there is sector-specific terminology that must be brought into it. The Open Data Institute (ODI) has done a tremendous amount of work in beginning to build that vocabulary and we commend it to anyone. To aid that, and ensure that readers of this report interpret its contents consistently, we have included a brief glossary of critical terminology used within this report or related to its contents. Given the importance of data literacy and a common vocabulary, our working group opened each of its meetings by reiterating a set of core definitions that we used to guide our work; we feel it important to do the same here. Those core definitions arise from the two important, distinct, but mutually beneficial outcomes that this framework seeks to create: ● an open API for data that is shared, including, but not limited to, customer data; and ● an open data API for market information and relevant open data. An open API is a means of accessing data based on an open standard: it is a public interface. Data exists on a spectrum of accessibility. The data spectrum ranges from closed to shared to open. The data accessed via an open API may be closed, shared or open data. Figure 1.1 The data spectrum * See http://theodi.org/data-spectrum In fact, it could include data considered to be “proprietary”. In that circumstance, the holder of rights to any such “proprietary” data could choose to share (but could not be compelled to do so unless the data was deemed not to be proprietary) that data via the open API, along with stipulations – or licensing terms – related to its use by those with whom it chooses to share it. Open data is data that anyone can access, use and share. An open data API, therefore, is a public interface that provides access to open data. An example of open data in this context could be financial product information. Any individual’s personal bank details or a company’s transaction data are considered closed or shared data. They will be made available via an open API as a result of the implementation of this work, but access to them would be subject to consent of the individual or business to whom the data belongs and specific governance related to that. Such data will not be licensed or made public as open data as a result of this work. A n open standard is developed and maintained collaboratively and transparently, and can be accessed and used by anyone. Key recommendations
Recommended publications
  • Next-Gen Technology Transformation in Financial Services
    April 2020 Next-gen Technology transformation in Financial Services Introduction Financial Services technology is currently in the midst of a profound transformation, as CIOs and their teams prepare to embrace the next major phase of digital transformation. The challenge they face is significant: in a competitive environment of rising cost pressures, where rapid action and response is imperative, financial institutions must modernize their technology function to support expanded digitization of both the front and back ends of their businesses. Furthermore, the current COVID-19 situation is putting immense pressure on technology capabilities (e.g., remote working, new cyber-security threats) and requires CIOs to anticipate and prepare for the “next normal” (e.g., accelerated shift to digital channels). Most major financial institutions are well aware of the imperative for action and have embarked on the necessary transformation. However, it is early days—based on our experience, most are only at the beginning of their journey. And in addition to the pressures mentioned above, many are facing challenges in terms of funding, complexity, and talent availability. This collection of articles—gathered from our recent publishing on the theme of financial services technology—is intended to serve as a roadmap for executives tasked with ramping up technology innovation, increasing tech productivity, and modernizing their platforms. The articles are organized into three major themes: 1. Reimagine the role of technology to be a business and innovation partner 2. Reinvent technology delivery to drive a step change in productivity and speed 3. Future-proof the foundation by building flexible and secure platforms The pace of change in financial services technology—as with technology more broadly—leaves very little time for leaders to respond.
    [Show full text]
  • 19-10842 Document: 00515936557 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2021
    Case: 19-10842 Document: 00515936557 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 Case No. 19-10842 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BRIAN MATTHEW MORTON, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, FORT WORTH DIVISION IN CASE NO. 19-CR-17-1, THE HONORABLE REED CHARLES O’CONNOR ________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AND ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JenniFer Lynch Brett Max KauFman JenniFer Stisa Granick Alan Butler Counsel of Record AMERICAN CIVIL AMERICAN CIVIL Megan Iorio ELECTRONIC FRONTIER LIBERTIES UNION LIBERTIES UNION Melodi Dincer FOUNDATION FOUNDATION FOUNDATION ELECTRONIC PRIVACY 815 Eddy Street 125 Broad Street 39 Drumm Street INFORMATION CENTER San Francisco, CA New York, NY San Francisco, CA 1519 New Hampshire 94109 10004 94111 Avenue NW Tel: (415) 436-9333 Tel: (212) 549-2500 Tel: (415) 373-0758 Washington, DC 20036 Fax: (415) 436-9993 Tel: (202) 483-1140 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae July 13, 2021 Case: 19-10842 Document: 00515936557 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/13/2021 SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Pursuant to this Court’s Rule 28.2.1, the undersigned counsel oF record For amici curiae certiFy that the Following additional persons and entities have an interest in the outcome oF this case. These representations are made in order that the judges of this court may evaluate possible disqualiFication or recusal. 1. The number and style oF this case are United States v.
    [Show full text]
  • Allied Irish Bank (GB) Comes Top Again in Comprehensive UK Banking Survey 27Th November 2000
    Allied Irish Bank (GB) comes top again in comprehensive UK banking survey 27th November 2000 Allied Irish Bank (GB) has today been named Best Business Bank for the fourth consecutive time in the Forum of Private Business’s (FPB) comprehensive survey into the strength of service offered by banks to private businesses. The FPB report, Private Businesses and Their Banks 2000, is a biennial survey of tens of thousands of British businesses and shows that Allied Irish Bank (GB) has maintained its No. 1 position over other major UK banks since 1994. Aidan McKeon, General Manager of Allied Irish Bank (GB) and Managing Director AIB Group (UK) p.l.c., commented: "While we are delighted to win this award for the fourth time, we are far from complacent. We continue to listen closely to our customers and to invest in the cornerstones of our business: recruiting, training and retaining quality people; building 'true’ business relationships; and ongoing commitment to maintaining short lines of decision making. At the same time, we are exploiting technology to make our service as customer- responsive and efficient as possible." Allied Irish Bank (GB), one of the forerunners in relationship banking, scores highest in the survey for knowledge and understanding. The bank also scored highly on efficiency, reliability and customer satisfaction. Mr. McKeon continued: "We recognise that business customers have particular needs and concerns and we are always striving to ensure that our customers receive a continually improved service. We shall look carefully at this survey and liaise with our customers to further strengthen our service." Stan Mendham, Chief Executive of the FPB commented: "The FPB congratulates Allied Irish Bank (GB) on being voted Best Business Bank in Britain for the fourth time.
    [Show full text]
  • Recuadro 6. Open Banking
    Reporte de estabilidad financiera | II semestre de 2018 todos los bancos3, y el Reino Unido, que ha hecho el OB de obligatorio cumplimiento para los bancos más grandes. Recuadro 6 El caso del Reino Unido es uno de los más documentados. En este país el OB fue impulsado por una investigación de Open Banking la Competition and Market Authority (CMA), en la que se evaluaron las prácticas que se presentaban entre bancos y pequeñas y medianas empresas (pymes) en el sistema ban- Eduardo Yanquen* cario del Reino Unido4. A partir de ese reporte se determinó que, con miras a incentivar la competencia en el mercado bancario, sería obligatoria la publicación de algunos datos transaccionales y de negocio relacionados con préstamos y cuentas bancarias, a partir del 13 de enero de 2018 para El open banking (OB) se puede definir como el uso de he- los nueve bancos más grandes del Reino Unido5. El siste- rramientas tecnológicas para producir ecosistemas en los ma que se determinó que debía utilizarse para realizar esta que terceros puedan acceder a datos financieros de los transmisión de información fueron las API. Aunque algunos usuarios por medio de interfaces de programación de apli- bancos presentaron problemas para cumplir con la fecha 1,2 caciones (API, por su sigla en inglés) . Mediante estas API inicialmente fijada para la implementación de las API, a la se pueden construir aplicaciones, servicios y herramientas fecha todas las entidades han logrado poner en funciona- que brindarían a los usuarios mayor control sobre sus da- miento sus sistemas. De esta manera, el OB en el Reino Uni- tos personales y un mayor rango de elección acerca de los do es ahora una realidad6.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating Digital Transformation in Banking Global Consumer Survey on Digital Banking, and Analysis on the Value of Bank Branches and Online Banking Channels
    Accelerating digital transformation in banking Global consumer survey on digital banking, and analysis on the value of bank branches and online banking channels Accelerating digital transformation in banking Contents Global consumer survey on digital banking Digital engagement is key to optimizing the consumer experience | 2 Satisfaction with banking is relative | 4 The rate of digital adoption is encouraging, though transactional in nature | 7 The digital-emotional connection | 10 Segment characteristics are not uniform by country | 13 More real in digital and digital in real | 15 The case for accelerating digital transformation | 19 Endnotes | 20 The value of bank branches in a digital world Bank branches are still relevant in a digital world | 22 The branch experience influences customer satisfaction more than online or mobile channels | 25 Reimagining branch transformation | 27 Endnotes | 29 The value of online banking channels The value of online banking channels | 30 Endnotes | 32 1 Accelerating digital transformation in banking - Global consumer survey on digital banking Global consumer survey on digital banking Digital engagement is key to optimizing the consumer experience HE BANKING INDUSTRY is in a digital arms The Deloitte Center for Financial Services sur- race. In 2018, banks globally plan to invest veyed 17,100 banking consumers across 17 countries US$9.7 billion to enhance their digital banking in May 2018 to measure the current state of banks’ T 1 capabilities in the front office alone. For many retail digital engagement. We asked respondents how banks, online and mobile channels have become as frequently they use different channels and services, important—if not more important—than branches with an eye on digital transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospects and Dangers of Algorithmic Credit Scoring in Vietnam: Regulating a Legal Blindspot
    No. 2021 - 1 The Prospects and Dangers of Algorithmic Credit Scoring in Vietnam: Regulating a Legal Blindspot Nicolas Lainez ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute Email: [email protected] January 2021 Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) and big data are transforming the credit market in Vietnam. Lenders increasingly use ‘algorithmic credit scoring’ to assess borrowers’ creditworthiness or likelihood and willingness to repay loan. This technology gleans non-traditional data from smartphones and analyses them through machine learning algorithms. Algorithmic credit scoring promises greater efficiency, accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and speed in predicting risk compared to traditional credit scoring systems that are based on economic data and human discretion. These technological gains are expected to foster financial inclusion, enter untapped credit markets, and deliver credit to ‘at-risk’ and financially excluded borrowers. However, this technology also raises public concerns about opacity, unfair discrimination, and threats to individual privacy and autonomy. In Vietnam, the lending industry deploys this technology at scale but in legal limbo. Regulation is vital to delivering big data and AI promises in the financial services market while ensuring fairness and public interest. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JEL Classification: G21, G28, G51 Keywords: Algorithmic Credit
    [Show full text]
  • Annual-Financial-Report-2009.Pdf
    Contents 4 Chairman’s statement 255 Statement of Directors’ responsibilities in relation to the Accounts 6 Group Chief Executive’s review 256 Independent auditor’s report 8 Corporate Social Responsibility 258 Additional information 12 Financial Review 276 Principal addresses - Business description 278 Index - Financial data - 5 year financial summary - Management report - Capital management - Critical accounting policies - Deposits and short term borrowings - Financial investments available for sale - Financial investments held to maturity - Contractual obligations - Off balance sheet arrangements 59 Risk Management - Risk Factors - Framework - Individual risk types - Supervision and regulation 106 Corporate Governance - The Board & Group Executive Committee - Directors’ Report - Corporate Governance statement - Employees 119 Accounting policies 136 Consolidated income statement 137 Balance sheets 139 Statement of cash flows 141 Statement of recognised income and expense 142 Reconciliations of movements in shareholders’ equity 146 Notes to the accounts 1 Forward-Looking Information This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and business of the Group and certain of the plans and objectives of the Group. In particular, among other statements, certain statements in the Chairman’s statement, the Group Chief Executive’s review, and the Financial Review and Risk Management sections, with regard to management objectives, trends in results of operations, margins, risk management, competition and the impact of changes in International Financial Reporting Standards are forward-looking in nature.These forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate only to historical or current facts.
    [Show full text]
  • BACKING OUR CUSTOMERS HALF-YEARLY FINANCIAL REPORT for the Six Months Ended 30 June 2021
    BACKING OUR CUSTOMERS HALF-YEARLY FINANCIAL REPORT For the six months ended 30 June 2021 AIB Group plc ENSURING A GREENER TOMORROW BY BACKING THOSE BUILDING IT TODAY. AIB is a financial services group. Our main business activities are retail, business and corporate banking, as well as mobile payments and card acquiring. We are committed to supporting the transition to the low-carbon economy and backing sustainable communities. Merchant Services Beekeeper and AIB employee Kevin Power attending to his bees on the roof of our head office in Molesworth St, Dublin. Half-Yearly Financial Report For the six months ended 30 June 2021 01 02 OVERVIEW BUSINESS REVIEW 2 Business performance 16 Operating and financial review 4 Chief Executive’s review 31 Capital 11 Our strategy 12 Highlights 03 04 RISK MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 36 Update on risk management and governance 84 Condensed consolidated interim financial statements 37 Credit risk 91 Notes to the condensed consolidated interim 78 Funding and liquidity risk financial statements 82 Interest rate benchmark reform 131 Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities 132 Independent review report to AIB Group plc 133 Forward looking statements This Half-Yearly Financial Report contains forward looking statements with respect to certain of the Group’s plans and its current goals and expectations relating to its future financial condition, performance, results, strategic initiatives and objectives. See page 133. 2 Business Performance AIB Group plc Half-Yearly Financial Report 2021 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Identity in Banking What Ceos Need to Know About Best Practices and Future Directions
    Digital Identity In Banking What CEOs Need to Know About Best Practices and Future Directions RON SHEVLIN Director of Research Cornerstone Advisors TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Digital Identity: A Challenge As Old As The Internet 3 Technology Developments In Digital Identity Management 7 Five Forces Shaping Digital Identity Management 15 Best Practices In Digital Identity Management For Today 17 Conclusion 19 About Cornerstone Advisors 19 Avoka (now Temenos) 20 Endnotes © 2018 Cornerstone Advisors. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this report by any means is strictly prohibited without written permission. DIGITAL IDENTITY: A CHALLENGE AS OLD AS THE INTERNET Although the topic of digital identity gets daily attention today in 2018, it’s hardly a new topic. In 1993, The New Yorker published what has become one of the most—if not the most—iconic cartoons about the Internet (Figure 1). In it, one dog says to another, “On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog.” Twenty-five years ago, many people saw the ability FIGURE 1: New Yorker Cartoon on Digital Identity to remain anonymous as a feature of the Internet, not a liability. Despite a quarter century of techno- logical advances that include e-commerce, social media, and the smartphone: “There is still no easy way to prove online that you are not a dog, are over 18, live at a certain address, graduated from a certain school, work at a specific company, or own a specific asset. These kinds of assertions about ourselves are difficult to trust because they are nearly impossible to verify.” 1 Source: The New Yorker WHY IS DIGITAL IDENTITY STILL A PROBLEM? If we’ve seen 25 years of technological advances, then why is digital identity still a problem? Three reasons: 1) There are no standardized formats for digital credentials; 2) There are no standardized methods to verify the source and integrity of digital credentials; and 3) The technological advances that have occurred over the past 25 years have exasperated the problem—not alleviated it.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Lexical Representations of Frames Using Lexical Substitution
    Generating Lexical Representations of Frames using Lexical Substitution Saba Anwar Artem Shelmanov Universitat¨ Hamburg Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Germany Russia [email protected] [email protected] Alexander Panchenko Chris Biemann Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology Universitat¨ Hamburg Russia Germany [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Seed sentence: I hope PattiHelper can helpAssistance youBenefited party soonTime . Semantic frames are formal linguistic struc- Substitutes for Assistance: assist, aid tures describing situations/actions/events, e.g. Substitutes for Helper: she, I, he, you, we, someone, Commercial transfer of goods. Each frame they, it, lori, hannah, paul, sarah, melanie, pam, riley Substitutes for Benefited party: me, him, folk, her, provides a set of roles corresponding to the sit- everyone, people uation participants, e.g. Buyer and Goods, and Substitutes for Time: tomorrow, now, shortly, sooner, lexical units (LUs) – words and phrases that tonight, today, later can evoke this particular frame in texts, e.g. Sell. The scarcity of annotated resources hin- Table 1: An example of the induced lexical represen- ders wider adoption of frame semantics across tation (roles and LUs) of the Assistance FrameNet languages and domains. We investigate a sim- frame using lexical substitutes from a single seed sen- ple yet effective method, lexical substitution tence. with word representation models, to automat- ically expand a small set of frame-annotated annotated resources. Some publicly available re- sentences with new words for their respective sources are FrameNet (Baker et al., 1998) and roles and LUs. We evaluate the expansion PropBank (Palmer et al., 2005), yet for many lan- quality using FrameNet.
    [Show full text]
  • Santander Bank Customer Satisfaction
    Santander Bank Customer Satisfaction Two-handed and convict Ross whiz so recognizably that Stefano supernaturalised his chartularies. Medium-sized and metazoic Brad codifying skeptically and buccaneer his Jugurtha mildly and kinetically. Wholesale Stefan parleyvoo some abettors and clobbers his mademoiselle so blunderingly! Prior presidents going and wish to understand and money jar with compliance areas of different countries, bank customer experience with their customer satisfaction was with Every single thing you have a satisfaction in this we strive to all banks in banks and when they shopped for new messages back or bank customer satisfaction. Assessing Classification Methods for Prediction of Customer Satisfaction Santander Bank Dataset The dataset traincsv was obtained from Kagglecom. The united states exhibition in historical data to other regional business banking sector may in latin america does on recent years. Enable them until you will improve or one of other nearby branches, an issue in. Position at least one, it will apply and on behalf of money. Joining santander we could not just four stars for ensembling tree algorithms in? Santander uk has had to choose the interest rates and so on how do i was a santander customer satisfaction. Since most impact of any unwanted effect on their financial institution standards are best possible once a stock. Are false data who the columns numeric or intelligence they need anything be encoded? If should wish to was the client at state center, we must they so realistically. Accounts in this element in all matters into company and certificates of corporate governance and compare reviews, it was a whole branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of England List of Banks- October 2020
    LIST OF BANKS AS COMPILED BY THE BANK OF ENGLAND AS AT 1st October 2020 (Amendments to the List of Banks since 31st August 2020 can be found below) Banks incorporated in the United Kingdom ABC International Bank Plc DB UK Bank Limited Access Bank UK Limited, The Distribution Finance Capital Limited Ahli United Bank (UK) PLC AIB Group (UK) Plc EFG Private Bank Limited Al Rayan Bank PLC Europe Arab Bank plc Aldermore Bank Plc Alliance Trust Savings Limited (Applied to Cancel) FBN Bank (UK) Ltd Allica Bank Ltd FCE Bank Plc Alpha Bank London Limited FCMB Bank (UK) Limited Arbuthnot Latham & Co Limited Atom Bank PLC Gatehouse Bank Plc Axis Bank UK Limited Ghana International Bank Plc GH Bank Limited Bank and Clients PLC Goldman Sachs International Bank Bank Leumi (UK) plc Guaranty Trust Bank (UK) Limited Bank Mandiri (Europe) Limited Gulf International Bank (UK) Limited Bank Of Baroda (UK) Limited Bank of Beirut (UK) Ltd Habib Bank Zurich Plc Bank of Ceylon (UK) Ltd Hampden & Co Plc Bank of China (UK) Ltd Hampshire Trust Bank Plc Bank of Ireland (UK) Plc Handelsbanken PLC Bank of London and The Middle East plc Havin Bank Ltd Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited, The HBL Bank UK Limited Bank of Scotland plc HSBC Bank Plc Bank of the Philippine Islands (Europe) PLC HSBC Private Bank (UK) Limited Bank Saderat Plc HSBC Trust Company (UK) Ltd Bank Sepah International Plc HSBC UK Bank Plc Barclays Bank Plc Barclays Bank UK PLC ICBC (London) plc BFC Bank Limited ICBC Standard Bank Plc Bira Bank Limited ICICI Bank UK Plc BMCE Bank International plc Investec Bank PLC British Arab Commercial Bank Plc Itau BBA International PLC Brown Shipley & Co Limited JN Bank UK Ltd C Hoare & Co J.P.
    [Show full text]