An Introduction to Five Colleges, Incorporated
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Five Collegeink
A publication of Five Colleges, Incorporated Volume 21 2008–2009 Five College Ink Lorna Peterson and Donal O’Shea on the past, present and future of Five Colleges PLUS: African Scholars Program’s lasting impact Five Colleges names new executive director Ink 2 LORNA PETERSON RETIRES FROM A JOYFUL JOB 13 A LASTING IMPACT: AFRICAN SCHOLARS ALUMNI CONTINUE SCHOLARLY COLLABORATION 17 NEWSBREAKS LORNA PETERSON RETIRES FROM “A JOYFUL job” hen she was hired by Five Colleges, Incorpo- Notable among them are the Women’s Studies Research rated, the consortium was just 15 years old; Center, the Risk Management Office, the WORD! multicul- Wmost of its current students, and some of its tural theater event and the new postdoctoral program. Lorna faculty, hadn’t even been born. In the 29 years since, particu- recently sat down with Donal O’Shea — her longtime friend larly the last 19 with Lorna at the helm, Five Colleges has ex- and Mount Holyoke’s dean of faculty — and with Ink editor perienced a tremendous evolution, as she helped initiate doz- Kevin Kennedy to discuss her Five College experiences and ens of academic programs, committees and annual events. her thoughts on the future of the consortium. 2 Five College ence on the History of Women. I had an office up at the INCREDIBLE VISION Williston Library. Peterson: When did you come to Mount Holyoke? O’Shea: I didn’t know that. O’Shea: I came in 1980, and I think you were at Five Col- leges then. Peterson: It was a yearlong job to organize the Berkshire Conference on the History of Women. -
Corporate Governance of Company Groups: International and Latin American Experience
Corporate Governance of Company Groups: International and Latin American Experience Preliminary version for comment. Hosted by : Please send written comments to [email protected] by 5 December, 2014 Latin American Roundtable Task Force on Corporate Governance of Company Groups 17 November, 2014 Hotel Hilton Bogotá, CARRERA 7 NO. 72-41, BOGOTA, 00000, COLOMBIA http://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/latinamericanroundtableoncorporategovernance.htm With funding support of: TABLE OF CONTENTS International and Latin American Overview ............................................................................. 3 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Economic Rationale for Corporate Groups and the Role of Corporate Governance ............. 4 3. International Work on Corporate Governance of Groups ...................................................... 8 4. Economic Relevance of Company Groups in LatAm .......................................................... 12 5. What is an Economic Group in LatAm? .............................................................................. 12 6. Structure of the Regulatory and Supervisory Framework ................................................... 13 7. Protection of Minority Shareholder Rights .......................................................................... 14 8. Economic Groups and Conflicts of Interest ......................................................................... 15 9. Multinational -
Five College 50Th Anniversary Special Project Fund
Five College 50th Anniversary Special Project Fund PURPOSE To celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Five College Consortium. The consortium was founded in May 1965 as Four Colleges, Incorporated. In September 1966, the consortium welcomed the newly founded Hampshire College, amending its purpose and changing the corporate name to Five Colleges, Incorporated. “The primary purpose of the corporation is to promote the broad educational and cultural objectives of Amherst College, Hampshire College, Mount Holyoke College, Smith College and the University of Massachusetts by encouraging and fostering closer cooperation and understanding among the faculty, staff and students of the five institutions, and by promoting and developing opportunities for joint lectures, concerts, plays, games and other activities, for sharing the use of the educational and cultural facilities of the five institutions and for a better understanding of the peoples, cultures and institutions of other nations.” GUIDELINES Eligibility: Open to any Five College collaborative program or group (including, but not limited to centers, councils, committees, departments, majors, certificate programs, faculty seminars, administrative collaborations, Museums10, Learning in Retirement, and student organizations). Purpose, Goals of Grants from the Fund: • For support of an event demonstrating or featuring cross-campus collaboration (academic or administrative) that also highlights to some extent the history of this collaboration. • Funds can be used towards enhancing a previously planned or regular annual event (for example a student symposium or lecture by a visiting scholar), or a newly conceived event. • Funds must be used between May 2015 and December 2016 the period of celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the Five College Consortium. -
Evaluation of Government-Sponsored R&D Consortia in Japan
Chapter 12 EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED R&D CONSORTIA IN JAPAN by Mariko Sakakibara 1 Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles Introduction Co-operative R&D has been widely celebrated as a means of promoting private R&D, and some see it as a major tool for enhancing industry competitiveness. Co-operative R&D is defined as an agreement among a group of firms to share the costs and results of an R&D project prior to the execution of that project. Co-operative R&D can be executed in many forms, including R&D contracts, R&D consortia and research joint ventures.2 In this analysis, these forms are collectively referred to as R&D consortia or co-operative R&D projects, interchangeably. Japan is regarded as a forerunner in the practice of co-operative R&D. The most celebrated example is the VLSI (Very Large Scale Integrated circuit) project, designed to help Japan catch up in semiconductor technology. The project, conducted between 1975 to 1985 with a budget of 130 billion yen (US$591 million) of which 22 per cent was financed by the government, developed state-of-the-art semiconductor manufacturing technology. All of the major Japanese semiconductor producers participated in this project, and Japanese semiconductor companies gained world leadership after the project. It is widely believed that this success story is only one of many. The perceived success of the VLSI project has motivated other countries to emulate “Japanese- style” collaboration. The 1984 US National Co-operative Research Act was enacted to relax antitrust regulations in order to allow the formation of research joint ventures. -
5A Few Bold Institutions
THE FIVE COLLEGE CONSORTIUM A few bold 5institutions In 1965, the Pioneer Valley’s four colleges, 1. Amherst College, 2. Mount Holyoke College, 3. Smith College, and the 4. University of Massachusetts Amherst, were experimenting with innovative ideas in higher education. One of those ideas was 5. Hampshire College, a radical student-centered model. The big idea, though, was sharing resources through an inter-college consortium. So what does that mean now? Your resources are multiplied by five. You can take classes, borrow books, play club sports, eat food, join clubs, and attend events at the other four campuses. You’ll make friends all across the Pioneer Valley. And for a college where students create their own programs of study, this is especially awesome. 3 WHO WE ARE The (really, really) 4,600+ big picture cross registrations for classes this year 30,000 undergraduate students Hampshire College Amherst College Mount Holyoke College foreign- 2,200+ Smith College 4 language faculty members UMass Amherst Five College majors: 70+ offerings Architectural Studies 5 Astronomy campuses Dance Film Studies 900+ student groups 9 million volumes within the Five College Library System 6 average number of 75+ courses Hampshire 17 intercollegiate students take in the certificate programs sports teams consortium over their four years 4 5 In addition to promoting each institution’s majors and programs, Five Colleges, Inc. sponsors learning centers, collaborative programs, additional certifications, and accelerated master’s programs. FIVE COLLEGES, INC. FIVE COLLEGE MAJORS | Astronomy, Film The link across Studies, Dance, Architectural Studies CERTIFICATE PROGRAMS | Approved by a campuses committee of Five College faculty, these certificates demonstrate extensive work in your field and are awarded with your bachelor’s degree. -
Open Reinvention Jchaszar.Pdf
The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Education THE REINVENTION OF HONORS PROGRAMS IN AMERICAN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1955-1965 A Dissertation in Higher Education by Julianna K. Chaszar © 2008 Julianna K. Chaszar Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2008 The dissertation of Julianna K. Chaszar was reviewed and approved* by the following: Roger L. Geiger Distinguished Professor of Higher Education Dissertation Adviser Chair of Committee William Pencak Professor of American History David Post Professor of Higher Education Patrick T. Terenzini Distinguished Professor of Higher Education Dorothy Evensen Professor-in-Charge of the Higher Education Program *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract A wave of interest in honors programs occurred at American colleges and universities in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Although honors education emerged in the U.S. some thirty years earlier, its scope had been limited primarily to private institutions and allowed upper division students to undertake independent reading and research in their major field. In contrast, the period of revitalization and new program formation beginning in the late 1950s was characterized by expansion in several directions, including the introduction of programs for freshmen and sophomores, creation of honors options in general education, adoption of honors education by major public institutions, and collaboration between colleges and secondary schools to identify and encourage academically talented students. The Inter-University Committee on the Superior Student (ICSS), led by Joseph W. Cohen at the University of Colorado at Boulder, was a significant force behind the renewal of interest in honors work during that period. -
Making of a College
Making of the College 2.0 [Version of May 10, 2006] Anniversaries, especially round ones, are arbitrary points, but they can serve as significant moments of stocktaking and rearticulation. Hampshire College has just celebrated thirty-five years of educating students on campus; in 2006 we mark the fortieth anniversary of Franklin Patterson and Charles R. Longsworth’s The Making of a College. A New Departure in Higher Education;1 and in two years we can commemorate a fiftieth anniversary, the appearance of “The New College Plan” itself.2 As a classicist and student of Vergil, I cannot help but think: Tantae molis erat… -- “so great a task it was to found,” in this case, our college.3 And not inappropriately, for Hampshire College neither was nor is just any college. The subtitle of “The New College Plan” runs “A Proposal for a Major Departure in Higher Education.” Hampshire College was intended to be an experiment in post-secondary pedagogy, an alternative not only to the other four Pioneer Valley institutions that, since Hampshire’s founding, constitute, along with Hampshire, the Five College Consortium, but also to the then standard modes of delivering a liberal arts education. It was to embody many ideals and goals of the liberal arts, to be sure, but to do so in new ways. Students were to craft, with faculty advisors, customized concentrations, pursuing courses of study they did not merely select but created. No off the shelf majors and lists of required courses. Hampshire did away not only with the major in its traditional form and course credits or “hours”; gone were letter grades and discipline-based departments altogether. -
Curiosity As Outreach: Flipping Outreach on Its Head
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst University Librarians Publication Series University Libraries 2020 Curiosity as Outreach: Flipping Outreach on its Head Paulina Borrego Anne Graham Ellen Lutz Melanie Radik Rebecca Reznik-Zellen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/librarian_pubs Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Issues in Science and ~ Jechnology Librarianship Tips from the Experts Curiosity as Outreach: Flipping Outreach on its Head Paulina Borrego Science & Engineering Librarian University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA [email protected] Anne Graham Science & Engineering Librarian University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA [email protected] Ellen Lutz Health Sciences Librarian University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA [email protected] Melanie Radik Science & Engineering Librarian University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA [email protected] Rebecca Reznik-Zellen Head, Science & Engineering Library University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA [email protected] Abstract Science and Engineering Library staff at the University of Massachusetts Amherst visited several sites on campus in a novel outreach initiative that involved all nine staff members taking “field trips” without agendas. We demonstrate that outreach without the explicit goal of promoting a specific resource or service can be an effective use of time, and can build social capital that shares the goals of traditional outreach. Involving all staff in this outreach effort was a valuable team building experience, exposing the depth of our interests and expertise to each other and to our campus community. Introduction Curiosity is an element of librarianship that is defined by Kathleen M. Fisher as “a relentless inquisitiveness about the world around and beyond us, a continual scrutiny and questioning of experience” (Fisher 2000). -
Recent Developments in the Public-Enterprise Sector of Korea
This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Governance, Regulation, and Privatization in the Asia-Pacific Region, NBER East Asia Seminar on Economics, Volume 12 Volume Author/Editor: Takatoshi Ito and Anne O. Krueger, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-38679-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/ito_04-1 Conference Date: June 28-30, 2001 Publication Date: January 2004 Title: Recent Developments in the Public-Enterprise Sector of Korea Author: Il Chong Nam URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10186 4 Recent Developments in the Public-Enterprise Sector of Korea Il Chong Nam 4.1 Introduction The government has always been the dominant figure in the corporate landscape of Korea. This is not surprising, considering that Korea has a relatively short history of capitalism and that the government played a de- cisive role in the fast industrialization process that began in the 1960s. An important aspect of the economic development strategy of the successive administrations was the creation of large firms in modern industries that realize economies of scale and scope. Many large commercial Korean firms were established by the chaebol system, which crucially depended on the government’s intervention in the financial market. Following the heavy and chemical industry drive of the mid-1970s, the automobile, shipbuild- ing, electronics, chemical, and oil refinery industries, as well as a host of others (including construction), were erected in this manner.1 The government’s involvement has been more direct in the remaining in- dustries that require large amounts of capital to start and maintain the business. -
An Overview of EU and National Case Law
e-Competitions Antitrust Case Laws e-Bulletin Utilities & Cartels Cartels in the utility sectors: An overview of EU and national case law ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES, BID RIGGING, CARTEL, EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION, JOINT-VENTURE, UTILITIES, SANCTIONS / FINES / PENALTIES, FOREWORD, JUDICIAL REVIEW, PRICE INCREASE Peter Alexiadis e-Com petitions Special Issue Utilities & Cartels I. Introduction A number of years have passed since I was invited to write the rst edition of the Foreword in e-Competition publication. Since that time, the case-law at EU and Member State level has expanded signicantly, with an ever-wider net being drawn over anti-competitive practices such as bid rigging and information sharing, on the one hand, and those problematic commercial practices featuring the active involvement of trade associations, on the other. We have also witnessed a range of cases where the dynamics of network industries have given rise to very particular restrictions of competition and where the public policy concerns justifying those restrictions are nely balanced. Finally, we have seen the inexorable rise of cartel prosecutions taking place in utility sectors which had, at least until recently, been associated with the abusive practices of dominant rms rather than incentives to collude. The compendium of case reviews covered in this publication covers all of the above themes, and a host of important procedural issues ranging from whether Government bodies can be found guilty of distorting national law through their anti-competitive actions [1], the interaction between sector-specic regulation and competition policy [2], the extent to which the ‘single economic entity’ doctrine insulates anti-competitive agreements entered into between different members of the same corporate group [3], whether adherence to ‘standard terms’ used across an industry can be treated as collusion [4], and the roles played by sectoral enquiries [5], follow-on civil damages actions [6] and on-site inspections [7]. -
I I Give Permission for Public Access to My Thesis and for Any Copying to Be
I give permission for public access to my thesis and for any copying to be done at the discretion of the archives librarian and/or the College librarian. ____________________________________ Beier Yao May 2013 i Examining the Source and Function of Meta-stereotypes in a Five-College Context by Beier Yao A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Mount Holyoke College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors Department of Psychology and Education Mount Holyoke College South Hadley, Massachusetts ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to all the individuals who supported me through this yearlong journey. The ending product bears all the marks left by them: First, I would like to thank my thesis advisor, Jessica Salvatore, for guiding me to the right directions, providing me with the vehicles most in need (both physically and metaphorically), and giving me the liberty to walk my own way at the same time. Though the destination was not exactly what we expected, at least I had a great time all along, even with the detours, and she was the one who never failed to make the journey exciting and delightful. I would also like to thank Robert Shilkret for his meticulous reading of my drafts, constant request for clarity, and all the intellectual comments. I am grateful to Haley Hedlin for agreeing to be on my committee and safeguarding the statistical analyses in this project. Words fail me when I try to express my gratitude to Fran Deutsch. Though she was not able to stay on board, she was the one who encouraged me to embark on the journey in the first place. -
Academic Regulations
Mount Holyoke College Catalog 2015-2016 Academic Regulations Mount Holyoke students are expected to be fully acquainted with the policies affecting their academic and nonacademic lives on campus. Policies are published in this Bulletin, the Student Handbook, and in Faculty Legislation. New policies are published on the registrar’s website. Registration and Class Attendance Students register for the next semester following academic advising periods. Courses may be added only during the first ten days of classes. Students may withdraw from courses through the first ten weeks of classes. Through the fifteenth day of classes, courses from which the student has withdrawn will not appear on the student’s academic record. After the fifteenth day of classes, withdrawals from courses require the approval of the instructor and will appear on the student’s record, with the notation “W.” After the fiftieth day of classes, students may withdraw from courses only with the authorization of the director of health services, the director of the counseling service, or the dean of the College and with the approval of the instructor. Courses recorded with the notation “W” will not affect a student’s grade average. Regular class attendance is expected of all students unless an individual instructor suspends this expectation. Deadlines for adding and withdrawing from courses that begin midsemester, such as half-semester physical education courses, fall midway through the term and are listed on the academic calendar on the registrar’s website. Course Load and Credits The normal program for undergraduates is 16 academic credits per semester. Students carrying fewer than 12 credits are considered part-time.