<<

The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

Professor Lasse H. Pedersen

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 1

Outline

ƒ Key questions: – What is the equilibrium required return, E(R), of a ? – What is the equilibrium price of a stock? –Which portfolios should hold in equilibrium? ƒ Answer: CAPM – Assumptions – Results: ¾Identify the tangency in equilibrium ¾Hence, identify investors’ portfolios ¾Derive equilibrium returns (and hence prices) Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 2

CAPM: Introduction

ƒ Equilibrium model that – predicts optimal portfolio choices – predicts the relationship between and – underlies much of modern theory – underlies most of real-world financial decision making ƒ Derived using Markowitz’s principles of portfolio theory, with additional simplifying assumptions. ƒ Sharpe, Lintner and Mossin are researchers credited with its development. ƒ William Sharpe won the Nobel Prize in 1990.

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 3 CAPM Assumptions ƒ Stylized Assumptions: 1. The is in a competitive equilibrium; 2. Single-period horizon; 3. All assets are tradable; 4. No frictions; 5. Investors are rational mean-variance optimizers with 6. homogeneous expectations ƒ Some assumptions can be relaxed, and CAPM still holds. ƒ An important approximation of reality in any case. ƒ If many assumptions are relaxed, generalized versions of CAPM applies. (Topic of ongoing research.)

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 4

1: The market is in a competitive equilibrium ƒ Equilibrium: – Supply = Demand – Supply of securities is fixed (in the -run). – If Demand > Supply for a particular , the excess demand drives up price and reduces expected return. – (Reverse if Demand < Supply) ƒ Competitive market: – Investors take prices as given – No can manipulate the market. – No monopolist Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 5

2: Single-period horizon

ƒ All investors agree on a horizon. ƒ Ensures that all investors are facing the same investment problem.

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 6 3: All assets are tradable

ƒ This includes in principle: – All financial assets (including international ) –Real estate – Human capital ƒ This ensures that every investor has the same assets to invest in: – all the assets in the world, the “

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 7

4: No frictions

ƒ No taxes ƒ No transaction costs (no bid-ask spread) ƒ Same interest rate for lending and borrowing ƒ All investors Investors can borrow or lend unlimited amounts. (No requirements.)

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 8

5-6: Investors are rational mean- variance optimizers with homogeneous expectations

ƒ Investors choose efficient portfolios consistent with their risk-return preferences ƒ Investors have the same views about expected returns, variances, and (and hence correlations).

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 9 What is the Equilibrium Tangency Portfolio? ƒ Recall from portfolio theory: – All investors should have a (positive or negative) fraction of their wealth invested in the risk-free security, and – The rest of their wealth is invested in the tangency portfolio. – The tangency portfolio is the same for all investors (homogeneous expectations). ƒ In equilibrium, supply=demand so: – the tangency portfolio must be the portfolio of all existing risky assets, the “market

portfolio” !! Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 10

The Market Portfolio

ƒ pi = price of one share of risky security i ƒ ni = number of for risky security i ƒ M = Market Portfolio. The portfolio in which each risky security i has the following weight: p × n ω = i i iM p × n ∑i i i of security i = total market capitalization In words, the market portfolio is the portfolio consisting of all assets (everything!). However, you also invest in the market portfolio if you buy a few shares of every security, weigthed by their market cap.

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 11

The Line (CML) ƒ Recall: The CAL with the highest is the CAL with respect to the tangency portfolio. ƒ In equilibrium, the market portfolio is the tangency portfolio. ƒ The market portfolio’s CAL is called the (CML). ƒ The CML gives the risk-return combinations achieved by forming portfolios from the risk-free security and the market portfolio:

[E(RM ) − R f ] E(R p ) = R f + σ p σ M Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 12 The E(R)-SD Frontier and The Capital Market Line

E[RM ]

Rf

σ M

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 13

The Required Return on Individual Stocks ƒ CAPM is most famous for its prediction concerning the relationship between risk and return for individual securities: E[Ri ] = R f + βi ⋅[E[RM ]− R f ]

cov[Ri , RM ] where βi = 2 σ M ƒ The model predicts that expected return of an asset is linear its ‘’. ƒ This linear relation is called the (SML). ƒ The beta measures the security’s sensitivity to

market movements. Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 14

Deriving CAPM Equation using FOC ƒ The market portfolio is the tangency portfolio and therefore it solves: E(R ) − R SR p f max p = w1 ,...wn∈R σ p where E(R ) = w E(R ) + (1− w )R p ∑i i i ∑i i f σ = w w cov(R , R ) p ∑i, j i j i j ƒ The first-order condition (FOC) is: ∂ 0 = SR that is, p w=wM ∂wi

cov(Ri , RM ) 0 = (E(Ri ) − R f )σ M − (E(RM ) − R f ) σ M Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 15 Security Market Line (SML)

E(R)  0.25 Securities with  SML 0.2 β>1    0.15 E(R )  M Securities with  0.1 0<β<1    0.05 Rf=5%

0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Beta coefficient β βM=1

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 16

E(R)-SD Frontier and the Betas

ƒ The graph relates the location of the individual securities with respect to the M-SD frontier to their betas.

0.3

0.25 CML E(R)-SD Frontier 0.2 Market Portfolio

0.15 β>1 „ „ Expected Return • β=1

0.1 „ „ „ 0<β<1 „ „„ Rf 0.05 β=0 „ „ β<0

0 0 0.05 0.1Prof. Lasse 0.15 H. Pedersen 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 17

The Capital Market Line and the Security Market Line

E[rM ] E[rM ]

E[rQ ] = E[rK ] E[rQ ] = E[rK ] r f rf

=1 σM

E[rM ]− rf E[rM ] − rf σM

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 18 Systematic and Non- ƒ The CAPM equation can be written as:

Ri = R f + β i ⋅ (RM − R f ) + error i

cov[ Ri , RM ] where β i = 2 σ M

E( error i ) = 0

cov[ error i , RM ] = 0 ƒ This implies the total risk of a security can be partitioned into two components: σ2 = β2σ2 + σ 2 {i 1i23M {i var(Ri ) market var(errori ) total risk idiosyncratic risk risk Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 19

Systematic and Non-Systematic Risk: Example ƒ ABC Internet stock has a of 90% and a beta of 3. The market portfolio has an expected return of 14% and a volatility of 15%. The risk- free rate is 7%. ƒ What is the equilibrium expected return on ABC stock? ƒ What is the proportion of ABC Internet’s variance which is diversified away in the market portfolio? 2 2 2 2 σi = βi σM + σi 2 2 2 2 (0.9) = 3 ×0.15 + σi 2 σi = 0.6075 ( σi = 0.779 ) 0.6075 Hence = 75% of variance is diversified away (0.9)2

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 20

Systematic and Non-Systematic Risk

ƒ βi measures security i’s contribution of to the total risk of a well-diversified portfolio, namely the market portfolio.

ƒ Hence, βi measures the non-diversifiable risk of the stock ƒ Investors must be compensated for holding non-diversifiable risk. This explains the CAPM equation:

E(Ri) = Rf + βi [ E(RM) - Rf ], i = 1,…,N Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 21

ƒ Recall the SML: E(Ri) = Rf + βi [ E(RM) - Rf ]

ƒ Stock i’s systematic or is: βi ƒ Investors are compensated for holding systematic risk in form of higher returns. ƒ The size of the compensation depends on the

equilibrium risk premium, [ E(RM) - Rf ]. ƒ The equilibrium risk premium is increasing in: 1. the variance of the market portfolio 2. the degree of risk aversion of average investor

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 22

Estimating Beta

An Example:

Many institutions estimate beta’s, e.g.:

−Bloomberg −Merrill Lynch −Value Line −Yahoo

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 23

Estimating Beta by Linear Regressions (OLS)

• CAPM equation: E[Ri]− Rf = βi[]E[Rm ]− Rf • Get data on “excess returns”: e e Ri (t) = Ri (t) − Rf RM (t) = RM (t) − Rf

• where Rf is the risk-free rate from time t-1 to time t.

• Estimate βi by running the regression: e e Ri (t) = αi + βi Rm (t) + errori (t)

• Typically, 60 months of data are used.

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 24 Security Characteristic Line (SCL) The SCL is the “regression line”:

Ri (t) − R f = α i + β i (RM (t) − R f ) + error i (t)

Note: ri − rf CAPM implies αi=0

rm − rf

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 25

Estimating Beta: Real Life Example, AT&T ƒ Take 5 years (1994-1998) of monthly data on AT&T returns, S&P500 returns and 1 month US T-bills. ƒ Construct excess returns ƒ Run the regression, for instance using Excel: – apply Tools, Add-ins, Analysis ToolPak –use Tools, Data Analysis, Regression ƒ The result is in the spreadsheet “betareg.xls” ƒ Excel Regression output:

Coefficients SE t Stat P-value Intercept 0.0007 0.0091 0.0748 0.9406 X Variable 1 0.9637 0.2172 4.4366 0.0000

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 26

Estimating Beta: Real-Life SCL for AT&T

AT&T vs Market Return

0.2

0.15

0.1 Actual AT&T Excess Returns 0.05

0 Predicted AT&T -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Excess Returns -0.05 AT&T return excess -0.1

-0.15

-0.2 Excess market return

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 27 Applications of the CAPM

ƒ Portfolio choice ƒ Shows what a “fair” security return is ƒ Gives benchmark for security analysis ƒ Required return used in capital budgeting to – compute NPV of risky project – or “hurdle rate” for IRR ƒ Evaluation of fund manager performance.

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 28

Stock Selection and Active Management ƒ One possible benchmark for stock selection is to find assets that are cheap relative to CAPM (or more advanced models). ƒ A security’s is defined as:

α i = E[Ri ] − R f − β i ⋅[E[RM ] − R f ]

cov[ Ri , RM ] where β i = 2 σ p ƒ Some fund managers try to buy positive-alpha stocks and sell negative-alpha stocks. ƒ CAPM predicts that all alpha’s are zero. Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 29

Stock Selection

1.40% A z SML 1.20% αˆ >0 ⇐ Underpriced A { z 1.00% M

0.80% Overpriced ⇒ αˆ <0 } B 0.60% B z

Rf 0.40%

0.20%

0.00% 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Beta Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 30 Active and Passive Strategies

ƒ An “active” strategy tries to beat the market buy stock picking, by timing, or other methods ƒ But, CAPM implies that – security analysis is not necessary – every investor should just buy a mix of the risk-free security and the market portfolio, a “passive” strategy.

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 31

Summary

ƒ The CAPM follows from equilibrium conditions in a frictionless mean-variance economy with rational investors. ƒ Prediction 1: Everyone should hold a mix of the market portfolio and the risk-free asset. (That is, everyone should hold a portfolio on the CML.)

ƒ Prediction 2: The expected return on a stock is a linear function of its beta. (That is, stocks should be on SML.)

ƒ The beta is given by: cov[Ri , RM ] βi = 2 σ M ƒ A stock’s beta can be estimated using historical data by . (That is, by estimating the SCL.)

Prof. Lasse H. Pedersen 32