Apéndice D 2.1 Generales

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Apéndice D 2.1 Generales 000441 APÉNDICE D 2.1 GENERALES EIA Sistema de Transporte Andino del Sur 000442 000443 000444 000445 000446 000446A 000447 APÉNDICES D 2.2 VEGETACIÓN EIA Sistema de Transporte Andino del Sur 000448 APÉNDICE D 2.2-1 METODOLOGÍA - VEGETACIÓN 1.1 EVALUACIÓN DE CAMPO La evaluación de la vegetación desarrollada en campo, tuvo como finalidad, describir y caracterizar las unidades de vegetación dentro del área de estudio. Para la identificación y registro de la vegetación de la región Moquegua se utilizó métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos. A continuación se describe brevemente la metodología empleada en los diferentes escenarios evaluados. 1.1.1 DETERMINACIÓN DE LA INTENSIDAD DE MUESTREO La intensidad de muestreo propuesta en el Plan de Investigación se mostraba conveniente para recoger la riqueza, diversidad y abundancia potencialmente presente en el área de estudio. Los puntos de Muestreo se determinó mediante el Mapa Base, las coordenadas geográficas y la ponderación de las características propias de cada unidad de vegeta- ción en base al área aproximada que ocupan, si son hábitats de especies sensibles, si se ubican dentro de un área con categoría de protección. Al área de estudio perteneciente a la Región Moquegua se le ha asignado una sola agrupación ecológica: Costa, la cual agrupa 04 unidades de vegetación: Vegetación desértica, Arbustal ribereño en valles costeros, Planicies y laderas desérticas de piedemonte con agrupaciones de tillandsia y Matorral y herbazal denso de piedemonte estacional. Se han evaluado cuantitativamente 43 parcelas (Cuadro 1) durante dos ingresos efectuados en marzo y octubre del 2009, las cuales sirvieron para el registro de información cuantitativa, mientras que recorridos a través de las unidades de vegetación sirvieron para colectar información cuantitativa de la vegetación. Cuadro 1 Esfuerzo de muestreo empleado en la evaluación de la vegetación por unidad de vegetación corres- pondiente a la costa de Moquegua para el primer y segundo ingreso a campo. Ecosistemas Primer Ingreso (pi) Segundo Ingreso (si) Unidades de Muestreo Estaciones de Unidades de Muestreo Estaciones de Muestreo (Parcelas) Muestreo (Parcelas) Unidad de Código de Vegetación la unidad de Número Código Número Código Número Código Número Código (UV) vegetación CO-Ve04- P1(pi) CO-Ve04- P2(pi) CO-Ve04- CO-Ve04- P1(si) P3(pi) Ve041 6 CO-Ve04- Planicies CO-Ve04- P2(si) y laderas P4(pi) CO-Ve04- desérticas de CO-Ve04- P3(si) UV05-CO 2 1 Ve043 6 piedemonte P5(pi) CO-Ve04- con escasa CO-Ve04- P4(si) vegetación P6(pi) CO-Ve04- CO-Ve08- P5(si) P1(pi) CO-Ve04- CO-Ve08- P6(si) Ve081 3 P2(pi) CO-Ve08- P3(pi) EIA Sistema de Transporte Andino del Sur Apéndice D 2.2 1 000449 Ecosistemas Primer Ingreso (pi) Segundo Ingreso (si) Unidades de Muestreo Estaciones de Unidades de Muestreo Estaciones de Muestreo (Parcelas) Muestreo (Parcelas) CO-Ve06- CO-Ve06- Arbustal P1(pi) P1(si) ribereño en UV03-CO 1 Ve061 2 1 Veo63 2 CO-Ve06- CO-Ve06- valles costeros P2(pi) P2(si) CO-Ve09- P1(si) Planicies CO-Ve09- CO-Ve09- y laderas P1(pi) P2(si) desérticas de CO-Ve09- CO-Ve09- piedemonte UV04-CO 1 Ve092 3 1 Ve093 5 P2(pi) P3(si) con CO-Ve09- CO-Ve09- agrupaciones P3(pi) P4(si) de tillandsia CO-Ve09- P5(si) CO-Ve02- CO-Ve02- P1(pi) P1(si) CO-Ve02- CO-Ve02- P2(pi) P2(si) Ve021 4 Ve023 4 CO-Ve02- CO-Ve02- P3(pi) P3(si) CO-Ve02- CO-Ve02- Matorral y P4(pi) P4(si) herbazal denso UV01-CO 2 2 de piedemonte CO-Ve10- estacional P1(si) CO-Ve10- CO-Ve10- P1(pi) P2(si) CO-Ve10- CO-Ve10- Ve102 3 Ve103 5 P2(pi) P3(si) CO-Ve10- CO-Ve10- P3(pi) P4(si) CO-Ve10- P5(si) TOTAL 21 22 Walsh Perú S.A., 2010. 1.1.2 MÉTODOS ESTANDARIZADOS APLICADOS 1.1.2.1 Identificación de Especies La identificación de las especies registradas y colectadas se efectuó tanto en campo como en gabinete. Con este fin los especialistas en vegetación recurrieron a bibliografía especializada (guías de campo, claves, etc.) así como consulta a herbarios nacionales como el Herbario San Marcos de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos y el Herbario HUSA de la Universidad Nacional San Agustín de Arequipa. Se siguió la taxonomía y sistemática utilizada por Missouri Botanical Garden, en Tropicos.org. Missouri Botanical Garden. <http://www.tropicos.org>. Es importante aclarar que la determinación de las especies a pesar del esfuerzo realizado, en algunos casos no se ha completado, por lo cual se hace uso de las siglas abreviadas en latín aff. y cf. antecediendo a la especie (Ejem: Quinchamalium cf. stuebelii ó Werneria aff. poposa). La abreviatura aff. denota que el ejemplar es muy afín morfológicamente a una especie (mucha similitud), mientras que cf. indica que se requiere con- 2 Apéndice D 2.2 EIA Sistema de Transporte Andino del Sur 000450 frontar con más especímenes para llegar a asegurar la determinación de la especie. Estas siglas utilizadas manifiestan un status provisional de una identificación taxonómica (Bengtson 1988). En algunos casos se han registrado especies dentro de un género como sp. debido a que el espécimen no manifes- taba aún caracteres que permitiesen la determinación completa, pero que sin embargo permitía determinar que dos especímenes de un mismo género podrían ser consideradas como especies distintas. Por ejemplo, Gentianella sp1, Gentianella sp2 ó Gentianella sp3. Para efectos de no confundir se les diferencia con numeración 1, 2, 3, etc., para lograr diferenciarlas. 1.1.2.2 Evaluación Cualitativa Durante la evaluación de campo se realizó una búsqueda y colecta intensiva en cada unidad de vegetación, dentro y fuera de las parcelas modificadas de Whittaker (Unidad de muestreo), para lograr registrar el mayor número de especies presentes y también ubicar las especies consideradas VECs, los cuales por su escasez en la mayoría de los casos ha sido de difícil ubicación. Adicionalmente, se obtuvo registros acerca del uso de las plantas, de las entrevistas realizadas por los evaluadores de campo a los pobladores y las proporcionadas en los Talleres de Evaluación Rural participativa (TERPs), especialmente apoyos locales. Estas entrevistas estuvieron enfocadas al registro de la utilidad de cada especie. Adicionalmente se ha realizado observaciones generales sobre el tipo de sustrato, vegetación y paisaje; así como eva- luación de especies más conspicuas y consideradas como importantes en el scoping. Tambien se consideró de manera complementaria el registro de las condiciones y grado de conservación de cada área estudiada, así como notas acerca de impactos que se encuentren como quema de pasturas, sobrepastoreo, deforestación, etc. Las muestras colectadas se procesaron siguiendo técnicas convencionales (Womersley, 1981), y cumpliendo los compromisos asumidos en la Resolución Directorial N° 230-2009-AG-DGFFS-DGEFFS. 1.1.2.3 Evaluación Cuantitativa Para el levantamiento cuantitativo de información de campo se empleó el método de Parcelas Modificadas de Whittaker (Campbell, et al. 2002). Este método consiste en el establecimiento de una serie de parcelas anidadas de diferentes tamaños permitiendo un acercamiento en múltiples escalas. La Parcela (P) mide 50 x 20 m (1000 m2 o 0.1 ha), incluye una subparcela central (SPC) de 20 x 5 m, dos subparcelas (SPA) de 5 x 2 m localizadas en esquinas contrarias de la parcela y diez subparcelas (H) de 2 x 0.5 m colocadas dentro de la periferia de la parcela (Figura 01). Las parcelas y subparcelas serán medidas y delimitadas con las cintas métricas (50 y 30 m), y marcadas con cinta flagging. Se registró la ubicación geográfica de las parcelas con el GPS (coordenadas UTM y altitud) y se fotografió el área evaluada. Diferentes clases de tamaño de la vegetación fueron medidas en cada subparcela: 1. En las subparcelas (H) más pequeñas (2 x 0.5 m) todas las plantas herbáceas y plántulas de menos de 40 cm de alto fueron identificadas y medidas (número de individuos y estimaciones de altura y cobertura por subparcela). 2. En las subparcelas (SPA) de las esquinas (5 x 2 m) todos los arbustos y los árboles con un diámetro a la altura del pecho (DAP) mayor o igual a 1 cm (=perímetro a la altura del pecho (PAP) de aproximadamente 3,1 cm) fueron medidos (número de individuos, altura y cobertura). También se incluyó plantines de hasta 3 m de alto. 3. En la subparcela (SPC) central (20 x 5 m) todos los árboles con DAP mayor o igual a 5 cm (PAP aprox. 16 cm) fueron identificados y medidos (número de individuos, pap, altura y cobertura). 4. Todos los árboles con DAP mayor o igual a 10 cm (PAP aprox. 31,4 cm) fueron identificados y medidos (número de individuos, pap, altura y cobertura) en la totalidad de la parcela (P) de 50 x 20 m (excepto en las áreas de las subparcelas donde ya fueron medidos). EIA Sistema de Transporte Andino del Sur Apéndice D 2.2 3 000451 Figura 1 Esquema de Parcela Modificada de Wittaker usada para la evaluación cuantitativa en las unidades muestrales. P (20x50 m) SPA1(2x5m) H1 (O.5X2.0 m) H2 (O.5X2.0 m) H3 (O.5X2.0 m) H4 (O.5X2.0 m) (O.5X2.0 H4 H10 (O.5X2.0 m) H10(O.5X2.0 SPC (5x20 m) H5 (O.5X2.0 m) (O.5X2.0 H5 H9 (O.5X2.0 m) (O.5X2.0 H9 H8 (O.5X2.0 m) H7 (O.5X2.0 m) H6 (O.5X2.0 m) SPA2(2x5m) Las parcelas fueron colocadas en los lugares que sean más representativos de una determinada Unidad de Vegetación, considerando siempre colocar el lado más largo hacia la gradiente (en los casos en los que se ha presentado) ya sea altitudinal o de cercanía a cuerpos de agua, etc.
Recommended publications
  • Broad-Tailed Hummingbird Coloration and Sun Orientation 1
    1 Broad-tailed hummingbird coloration and sun orientation 1 Two ways to display: male hummingbirds show different 2 color-display tactics based on sun orientation 3 Running header: Broad-tailed hummingbird coloration and sun orientation 4 5 Richard K. Simpson1* and Kevin J. McGraw1 6 1School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4501 7 *Corresponding Author. Email: [email protected]; Phone: (480) 965-2593 8 9 ABSTRACT 10 Animals exhibit a diversity of ornaments and courtship behaviors, which often co- 11 occur and are used for communication. The sensory drive hypothesis states that these 12 traits evolved and vary due to interactions with each other, the environment, and signal 13 receiver. However, interactions between colorful ornaments and courtship behaviors, 14 specifically in relation to environmental variation, remain poorly understood. We studied 15 male iridescent plumage (gorgets), display behavior, and sun orientation during courtship 16 flights (shuttle displays) in broad-tailed hummingbirds (Selasphorus platycercus), to 17 understand how these traits interact in both space and time to produce the perceived 18 coloration of males. We also tested how gorget coloration varies among males based on 19 their plumage, behavioral, and morphological characteristics. In contrast with previous 20 work on other animals, we found that displaying males did not directionally face the sun, 21 but instead displayed on a continuum of solar orientation angles. The gorgets of males 22 who tended to face the sun during their displays appeared flashier (i.e. exhibited greater 23 color/brightness changes), brighter, and more colorful, whereas the gorgets of males who 2 Broad-tailed hummingbird coloration and sun orientation 24 tended to not face the sun were more consistently reflective (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • N° English Name Scientific Name Status Day 1
    1 FUNDACIÓN JOCOTOCO CHECK-LIST OF THE BIRDS OF YANACOCHA N° English Name Scientific Name Status Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 1 Tawny-breasted Tinamou Nothocercus julius R 2 Curve-billed Tinamou Nothoprocta curvirostris U 3 Torrent Duck Merganetta armata 4 Andean Teal Anas andium 5 Andean Guan Penelope montagnii U 6 Sickle-winged Guan Chamaepetes goudotii 7 Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis 8 Black Vulture Coragyps atratus 9 Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura 10 Andean Condor Vultur gryphus R Sharp-shinned Hawk (Plain- 11 breasted Hawk) Accipiter striatus U 12 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus 13 Black-and-chestnut Eagle Spizaetus isidori 14 Cinereous Harrier Circus cinereus 15 Roadside Hawk Rupornis magnirostris 16 White-rumped Hawk Parabuteo leucorrhous 17 Black-chested Buzzard-Eagle Geranoaetus melanoleucus U 18 White-throated Hawk Buteo albigula R 19 Variable Hawk Geranoaetus polyosoma U 20 Andean Lapwing Vanellus resplendens VR 21 Rufous-bellied Seedsnipe Attagis gayi 22 Upland Sandpiper Bartramia longicauda R 23 Baird's Sandpiper Calidris bairdii VR 24 Andean Snipe Gallinago jamesoni FC 25 Imperial Snipe Gallinago imperialis U 26 Noble Snipe Gallinago nobilis 27 Jameson's Snipe Gallinago jamesoni 28 Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius 29 Band-tailed Pigeon Patagoienas fasciata FC 30 Plumbeous Pigeon Patagioenas plumbea 31 Common Ground-Dove Columbina passerina 32 White-tipped Dove Leptotila verreauxi R 33 White-throated Quail-Dove Zentrygon frenata U 34 Eared Dove Zenaida auriculata U 35 Barn Owl Tyto alba 36 White-throated Screech-Owl Megascops
    [Show full text]
  • Oni1,2 ∙ Juan Aguirre2
    (2018) 29: 11–18 NESTING ECOLOGY OF THE ENDANGERED CHILEAN WOODSTAR (EULIDIA YARRELLII) Cristián F. Estades1,2 ∙ Ilenia Lazzoni1,2 ∙ Juan Aguirre2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología de Vida Silvestre, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, Av. Santa Rosa 11315, La Pintana, Santiago, Chile. 2 AvesChile (Chilean Ornithologists' Union), Santiago, Chile. E-mail: Cristián F. Estades∙[email protected] Abstract ∙ The Chilean Woodstar (Eulidia yarrellii) is a critically endangered hummingbird of the Atacama desert in northern Chile, with a population estimate of around 320 individuals in 2017. To generate useful information for the design of population-recovery actions, we conducted a study of the nesting ecology of the species between 2006 and 2008. Our specific goals were to provide a quantitative descrip- tion of the species breeding habitat, to describe the basic breeding biology of the species, and to assess the current levels of nesting success. Most of our work was conducted in the valleys of Azapa and Vitor, two of the three last valleys where the species is known to persist. Alt- hough we recorded some juveniles in Azapa, we only observed the species nesting in one site in Chaca (Vitor valley), in a small (1.4 ha) olive grove where 13–20 simultaneous nests were found during the studied breeding seasons. Nesting occurs in September–October, and its tim- ing is apparently synchronized with the flowering of chañar (Geoffroea decorticans). The species has a particularly long breeding period with an average of 48 days (17 d for the egg stage, 31 d for the nestling stage).
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Natural History of Birds in Green Urban Areas of the City of Quito, Ecuador (America)
    Diversity and natural history of birds in green urban areas of the city of Quito, Ecuador (America) Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia1,2,3* & Eliana Montenegro1 1 Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Laboratorio de Zoología Terrestre. Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito, Ecuador 2 King’s College London, Department of Geography, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK 3 Aves&Conservación / BirdLife Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador * E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The diversity and ecology of urban bird communities have been extensively studied in Neartic and Paleartic areas, however, little is known about urban Neotropical areas. Quito, capital city of Ecuador, is located on a highland valley in the megadiverse tropical Andes. Founded in 1534, Quito did not increase significantly its urban area until the late 19th century, growing at an accelerated and unplanned rate during the 20th century. More than 100 species were known to inhabit in Quito at the end of the 19th century. Currently, most authors estimated that no more than 40 species occur in Quito, although no systematic bird studies have been conducted. Our research is a first approach to the avifauna of Quito, surveying the diversity living in green urban areas within the city borders. We used two field methodologies, i.e. line transects and point counts, to survey 16 green urban areas over 12 months. We recorded 65 species of birds, belonging to 20 families and 9 orders. Three species were the most common and frequent: Eared Dove Zenaida auriculata, Rufous-collared Sparrow Zonotrichia capensis, and Great Thrush Turdus fuscater, being omnivores and granivores adapted to anthropic habitats with low ecological complexity.
    [Show full text]
  • Aves Del Desierto.Pdf
    avesVíctor Pulido • Letty Salinas • Césardel Arana desierto birds from the desert DE LA COSTA CENTRAL DEL PERÚ / FROM THE CENTRAL COAST OF PERU Aves en el Perú}29 aves del desierto birds from the desert DE LA COSTA CENTRAL DEL PERÚ / FROM THE CENTRAL COAST OF PERU Ica, Barranca-Perú Autores / Authors Víctor Pulido, Letty Salinas, César Arana Editora General / Editor-in-chief Josefina Barrón Diseñador Gráfico / Graphic designer Miguel Santaya AVES DEL DESIERTO DE LA COSTA CENTRAL DEL PERÚ Primera Edición / First edition Mayo / May 2013 Equipo Editorial / Editorial team Autores / Authors Víctor Pulido Capurro Letty Salinas Sánchez César Arana Bustamante Editora General / Editor-in-chief Josefina Barrón Diseñador Gráfico / Graphic designer Miguel Santaya Fotografía / Photography César Arana Jason Sullivan Liliana Ayala Carlos Mendoza José Otero Robert Williams Traductor / Translator Simon Walter Compilador / Compiler Josefina Barrón Impresión CECOSAMI PREPRENSA E IMPRESIÓN DIGITAL S.A. Calle Los Plateros N° 142 Urb. El Artesano Ate - Lima Hecho el Depósito Legal en la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú N° 2013-06523 ISBN N° 978-612-45865-4-5 Proyecto Editorial N° 10701001300401 © Víctor Pulido, Letty Salinas, César Arana (2013) “Todos los derechos reservados de acuerdo a Ley. Prohibida la reproducción total o parcial de este libro por cualquier medio sin permiso de los propietarios de los derechos de autor.” Impreso en Perú / Printed in Peru De esta edición JOSEFINA BARRON EDITORES EIRL Foto de carátula: Para su sello editorial: BARRON EDICIONES Huerequeque en el desierto Av. Tomás Valle / Elmer Faucett s/n, Int. 124-A Cover photo: A Peruvian Thick-Knee in the desert Callao - Callao Derecha: Tiraje: 2000 ejemplares Joven turtupilín posa para la cámara Right: A young Turtupilin poses for the camera { 5 10 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Contents
    Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU CONTENTS CONTENTS PERU, THE NATURAL DESTINATION BIRDS Northern Region Lambayeque, Piura and Tumbes Amazonas and Cajamarca Cordillera Blanca Mountain Range Central Region Lima and surrounding areas Paracas Huánuco and Junín Southern Region Nazca and Abancay Cusco and Machu Picchu Puerto Maldonado and Madre de Dios Arequipa and the Colca Valley Puno and Lake Titicaca PRIMATES Small primates Tamarin Marmosets Night monkeys Dusky titi monkeys Common squirrel monkeys Medium-sized primates Capuchin monkeys Saki monkeys Large primates Howler monkeys Woolly monkeys Spider monkeys MARINE MAMMALS Main species BUTTERFLIES Areas of interest WILD FLOWERS The forests of Tumbes The dry forest The Andes The Hills The cloud forests The tropical jungle www.peru.org.pe [email protected] 1 Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU ORCHIDS Tumbes and Piura Amazonas and San Martín Huánuco and Tingo María Cordillera Blanca Chanchamayo Valley Machu Picchu Manu and Tambopata RECOMMENDATIONS LOCATION AND CLIMATE www.peru.org.pe [email protected] 2 Traveler’s Guide WILDLIFE WATCHINGTraveler’s IN PERU Guide WILDLIFE WATCHING IN PERU Peru, The Natural Destination Peru is, undoubtedly, one of the world’s top desti- For Peru, nature-tourism and eco-tourism repre- nations for nature-lovers. Blessed with the richest sent an opportunity to share its many surprises ocean in the world, largely unexplored Amazon for- and charm with the rest of the world. This guide ests and the highest tropical mountain range on provides descriptions of the main groups of species Pthe planet, the possibilities for the development of the country offers nature-lovers; trip recommen- bio-diversity in its territory are virtually unlim- dations; information on destinations; services and ited.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis and Observations of a Hybrid Hummingbird (Metallura Tyrianthina X Aglaiocercus Kingi) in the Eastern Andes of Colombia F
    Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Ex. Fis. Nat. 39(153):481-490, octubre-diciembre de 2015 Hybrid hummingbird at Rogitama, Boyacá doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.260 Ciencias naturales Diagnosis and observations of a hybrid hummingbird (Metallura tyrianthina x Aglaiocercus kingi) in the Eastern Andes of Colombia F. Gary Stiles*, José Oswaldo Cortés-Herrera Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia Abstract An unusual, strikingly colored male hummingbird present for several months in the Rogitama Biodiversity Reserve in Boyacá, Colombia created considerable media attention. It was initially suggested that the bird might represent the rediscovery of the Bogotá Sunangel, Heliangelus zusii. However, a later study of its DNA identified H. zusii as a member of a clade that includes Aglaiocercus and Taphrolesbia. Given the many differences in plumage from the Rogitama hummingbird, this hypothesis was rejected. Three hypotheses regarding its identity were examined in detail: it could represent an unusually colored male of Aglaiocercus kingi, a hybrid between two local species, or an undescribed species. We observed this bird’s foraging and interactions with other hummingbirds, recorded its song and captured it to describe in detail its plumage and take morphological measurements, after which it was released. We rejected all hypotheses except that of a hybrid, and concluded that A. kingi and Metallura tyrianthina were its probable parents. In contrast to its plumage and morphometrics, its song was unlike those of its putative parents, possibly representing a transgressive character. The same may be true of the bluish coloration (termed “hybrid bluing”) that characterized several hybrids between green-backed parental species, including the Rogitama hummingbird.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Choice for Wildlife Holidays Welcome
    HOLIDAYS WITH 100% FINANCIAL PROTECTION The natural choice for wildlife holidays Welcome After spending considerable time and effort reflecting, questioning what we do and how we do it, and scrutinising the processes within our office and the systems we use for support, I am delighted to say that we are imbued with a new vigour, undiminished enthusiasm, and greater optimism than ever. My own determination to continue building on the solid foundation of twenty years of experience in wildlife tourism, since we started from very humble beginnings – to offer what is simply the finest selection of high quality, good value, tailor-made wildlife holidays – remains undaunted, and is very much at the core of all we do. A physical move to high-tech office premises in the attractive city of Winchester leaves us much better connected to, and more closely integrated with, the outside world, and thus better able to receive visitors. Our team is leaner, tighter, more widely travelled and more knowledgeable than ever before, allowing us to focus on terrestrial, marine and – along with Dive Worldwide – submarine life without distraction. In planning this brochure we deliberately set out to whet the appetite, and make no mention of either dates or prices. As the vast majority of trips are tailored to our clients’ exact requirements – whether in terms of itinerary, duration, standard of accommodation or price – the itineraries herein serve merely as indications of what is possible. Thereafter, you can refine these suggestions in discussion with one of our experienced consultants to pin down your precise needs and wants, so we can together create the wildlife holiday of your dreams.
    [Show full text]
  • Peru: from the Cusco Andes to the Manu
    The critically endangered Royal Cinclodes - our bird-of-the-trip (all photos taken on this tour by Pete Morris) PERU: FROM THE CUSCO ANDES TO THE MANU 26 JULY – 12 AUGUST 2017 LEADERS: PETE MORRIS and GUNNAR ENGBLOM This brand new itinerary really was a tour of two halves! For the frst half of the tour we really were up on the roof of the world, exploring the Andes that surround Cusco up to altitudes in excess of 4000m. Cold clear air and fantastic snow-clad peaks were the order of the day here as we went about our task of seeking out a number of scarce, localized and seldom-seen endemics. For the second half of the tour we plunged down off of the mountains and took the long snaking Manu Road, right down to the Amazon basin. Here we traded the mountainous peaks for vistas of forest that stretched as far as the eye could see in one of the planet’s most diverse regions. Here, the temperatures rose in line with our ever growing list of sightings! In all, we amassed a grand total of 537 species of birds, including 36 which provided audio encounters only! As we all know though, it’s not necessarily the shear number of species that counts, but more the quality, and we found many high quality species. New species for the Birdquest life list included Apurimac Spinetail, Vilcabamba Thistletail, Am- pay (still to be described) and Vilcabamba Tapaculos and Apurimac Brushfnch, whilst other montane goodies included the stunning Bearded Mountaineer, White-tufted Sunbeam the critically endangered Royal Cinclodes, 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Peru: From the Cusco Andes to The Manu 2017 www.birdquest-tours.com These wonderful Blue-headed Macaws were a brilliant highlight near to Atalaya.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Sep 2018 Lists of Victims and Hosts of the Parasitic
    version: 21 Sep 2018 Lists of victims and hosts of the parasitic cowbirds (Molothrus). Peter E. Lowther, Field Museum Brood parasitism is an awkward term to describe an interaction between two species in which, as in predator-prey relationships, one species gains at the expense of the other. Brood parasites "prey" upon parental care. Victimized species usually have reduced breeding success, partly because of the additional cost of caring for alien eggs and young, and partly because of the behavior of brood parasites (both adults and young) which may directly and adversely affect the survival of the victim's own eggs or young. About 1% of all bird species, among 7 families, are brood parasites. The 5 species of brood parasitic “cowbirds” are currently all treated as members of the genus Molothrus. Host selection is an active process. Not all species co-occurring with brood parasites are equally likely to be selected nor are they of equal quality as hosts. Rather, to varying degrees, brood parasites are specialized for certain categories of hosts. Brood parasites may rely on a single host species to rear their young or may distribute their eggs among many species, seemingly without regard to any characteristics of potential hosts. Lists of species are not the best means to describe interactions between a brood parasitic species and its hosts. Such lists do not necessarily reflect the taxonomy used by the brood parasites themselves nor do they accurately reflect the complex interactions within bird communities (see Ortega 1998: 183-184). Host lists do, however, offer some insight into the process of host selection and do emphasize the wide variety of features than can impact on host selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Urban Conservation Save a Critically Endangered Bird?
    BIRDCONSERVATION The Magazine of American Bird Conservancy FALL 2017 BIRD’S EYE VIEW ABC’s New President: ABC is the Western Hemisphere’s bird conservation Putting Hope Into Action specialist—the only organization with a single and steadfast t is an enormous honor for me to take on the species are among the most heavily impacted. ABC commitment to achieving conservation results for native role of ABC President following in the footsteps will work with partners through BirdScapes and other Fall 2017 Iof George Fenwick. As we worked together for conservation tools to ensure that these birds and wild birds and their habitats more than 20 years, George and I collaborated with their habitats are adequately conserved. And we will throughout the Americas. the staff to develop American remain at the forefront to find BIRDCONSERVATION Bird Conservancy’s conservation both political and technological strategy. It has produced solutions to the main threats to A copy of the current financial statement and registration filed by the organization demonstrable results year after birds. may be obtained by contacting: ABC, P.O. 10 Airspace May Be the Final year, and I believe ABC is firmly Box 249, The Plains, VA 20198. 540-253- 5780, or by contacting the following state We will continue to conduct Ecological Frontier on the right track. agencies: our work with authenticity, Florida: Division of Consumer Services, I love birds and birding, and I want transparency, and dignity; we will toll-free number within the state: my children, and eventually their approach our partners thoughtfully 800-435-7352. 14 Can Urban Conservation children, to have the opportunity and with respect, even if we Maryland: For the cost of copies and postage: Office of the Secretary of State, Save a Rare Bird? to enjoy birds as I have.
    [Show full text]
  • Huacarpay – Acjanacu- Pillahuata – San Pedro
    Birding program – Manu National Park 08 days private service Day 01: Cusco – Huacarpay – Acjanacu- Pillahuata – San Pedro We depart from Cusco around 04:30 a.m. arriving at Lake Huarcarpay 30 minutes later. Here we take time and spend the entire day observing highland lake and marsh birds. The best is to follow the road that goes around the lake and start seeing most of the waterfowl typical of Andean wetlands including grebes, ducks, gallinules and coots. The wet grasslands in front of the marsh are good for shorebirds and Andean Negrito. We can look for occasional migrants such as the Hudsonian Godwit (rare) and Baird’s Sandpiper. The many- Coloured Rush-Tyrant and two endemic, the Rusty-fronted Canastero that can be seen around the ruins on the hillside above the Lake and a spectacular hummingbird, the Bearded Mountaineer. We continue to the interesting tombs of Ninamarca, commonly known as “Chullpas”. We continue to Paucartambo, a picturesque Spanish colonial town and walk the surrounding area and semi-humid montane scrub where a Taczanowski’s Tinamou has been reported here. Common to see around are: White-rufted Sunbeam, Creamy-crested Spintail, Cinereous Conebill, Torrent Duck. Our vehicle wll take us up to Acjanacu pass with its elfin forest marks the beginning of the Cultural Zone of Manu Biosphere Reserve. Birders stay the night here because it is possible to see White-browed chat-tyrant, the Chestnut-breasted mountain-finch, Puna Thistle tail, Paramo Pipit, Diademed Tapaculo, Puna Tapaculo, Masked flowerpiercer, Golden-colared Tanager, Drab hemispingus and small mixed flocks with among others.
    [Show full text]