Less Equal: LGBTI Human Rights Defenders in Armenia, Belarus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Less Equal: LGBTI Human Rights Defenders in Armenia, Belarus LESS EQUAL LGBTI HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN ARMENIA, BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND KYRGYZSTAN Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 7 million people who campaign for a world where human rights are enjoyed by all. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. © Amnesty International 2017 Except where otherwise noted, content in this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Cover photo: “Affection is not propaganda”; graffiti in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan (attribution, non-commercial, no derivatives, international 4.0) licence. © Amnesty International 2016 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode For more information please visit the permissions page on our website: www.amnesty.org Where material is attributed to a copyright owner other than Amnesty International this material is not subject to the Creative Commons licence. First published in 2017 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House, 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW, UK Index: EUR 04/7574/2017 Original language: English amnesty.org CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMMARY 8 2. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 10 2.1 SCOPE 10 2.2 METHODOLOGY 11 2.2.1 PARTICIPATORY WORKSHOPS 11 2.2.2 CASE STUDIES 11 2.2.3 FOLLOW UP WORKSHOPS 12 2.2.4 SEMI-STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS 12 2.2.5 ANONYMITY 12 3. PROTECTION OF LGBTI RIGHTS UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW 13 3.1 PRINCIPLE OF NON-DISCRIMINATION 14 3.2 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, ASSOCIATION AND PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY 15 3.3 HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS 16 3.4 GENDER IDENTITY 16 4. COUNTRY CONTEXTS 18 4.1 ARMENIA 19 4.1.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 20 4.1.2 TRANSGENDER RIGHTS 21 4.1.3 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 21 4.1.4 FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY 21 4.1.5 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION 21 4.1.6 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA ENVIRONMENT 21 4.1.7 RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST LGBTI PEOPLE 22 4.2 BELARUS 23 4.2.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 24 4.2.2 TRANSGENDER RIGHTS 24 4.2.3 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 25 4.2.4 FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY 25 LESS EQUAL LGBTI HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN ARMENIA, BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND KYRGYZSTAN Amnesty International 3 4.2.5 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION 25 4.2.6 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA ENVIRONMENT 26 4.2.7 RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST LGBTI PEOPLE 26 4.3 KAZAKHSTAN 27 4.3.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 28 4.3.2 TRANSGENDER RIGHTS 28 4.3.3 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 29 4.3.4 FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY 29 4.3.5 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION 29 4.3.6 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA ENVIRONMENT 29 4.3.7 RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST LGBTI PEOPLE 30 4.4 KYRGYZSTAN 31 4.4.1 LEGAL FRAMEWORK 31 4.4.2 TRANSGENDER RIGHTS 32 4.4.3 OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 33 4.4.4 FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY 33 4.4.5 FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION 33 4.4.6 FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND MEDIA ENVIRONMENT 33 4.4.7 RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST LGBTI PEOPLE 34 5. LGBTI RIGHTS MOVEMENTS: STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES, THREATS 37 5.1 STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES: COMMON TRENDS 37 5.1.1 RESILIENCE OF LGBTI HRDS 37 5.1.2 INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY AND SUPPORT 37 5.1.3 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS STANDARDS AND MECHANISMS 38 5.1.4 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COALITIONS 38 5.1.5 SOLIDARITY FROM SOME SECTIONS OF CIVIL SOCIETY 38 5.2 WEAKNESSES AND THREATS: COMMON TRENDS 38 5.2.1 LACK OF SOLIDARITY AND SUPPORT FROM “MAINSTREAM” HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATIONS 38 5.2.2 POLITICIZATION OF LGBTI RIGHTS 39 5.2.3 REPRESSIVE LAWS 39 5.2.4 NEGATIVE SOCIAL ATTITUDES 40 5.2.5 FAILURE TO PROSECUTE HATE CRIMES AGAINST LGBTI PEOPLE 40 5.2.6 ACTIVIST BURNOUT 41 5.2.7 “EXCLUDED FROM THE MAINSTREAM” OF HUMAN RIGHTS RHETORIC AND PRACTICE 42 6. CASE STUDY: KYRGYZSTAN “EXCLUDED FROM THE MAINSTREAM” 44 6.1 PERSPECTIVES OF LGBTI HRDS 45 6.2 PERSPECTIVES OF OTHER HRDS 46 6.2.1 FEAR OF THE CONSEQUENCES 46 6.2.2 LACK OF A UNIVERSAL APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS 47 LESS EQUAL LGBTI HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN ARMENIA, BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND KYRGYZSTAN Amnesty International 4 6.2.3 DISUNITY IN CIVIL SOCIETY 48 6.3 STATE ACTORS 48 6.3.1 OMBUDSMAN’S REPORT 48 6.4 INTERNATIONAL ACTORS 49 6.5 INTERNATIONAL MECHANISMS 49 7. CASE STUDY: ARMENIA “LESS EQUAL” 51 7.1 PERSPECTIVES OF LGBTI HRDS 52 7.2 PERSPECTIVES OF OTHER HRDS 52 7.2.1 HOMOPHOBIA 53 7.2.2 FEAR OF ATTACK 53 7.2.3 LACK OF A UNIVERSAL APPROACH TO HUMAN RIGHTS 54 7.2.4 WHAT ENABLES THOSE WHO DO SPEAK OUT? 54 7.3 STATE ACTORS 54 7.4 INTERNATIONAL ACTORS 55 7.5 INTERNATIONAL AND REGIONAL MECHANISMS 56 8. CONCLUSIONS 57 9. RECOMMENDATIONS 59 LESS EQUAL LGBTI HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN ARMENIA, BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND KYRGYZSTAN Amnesty International 5 GLOSSARY WORD DESCRIPTION BISEXUAL A person who is emotionally and sexually attracted to persons of more than one sex1 GENDER Each person’s deeply felt internal and individual experience of gender, which IDENTITY may or may not correspond with the sex assigned at birth, including the personal sense of the body (which may involve, if freely chosen, modification of bodily appearance or function by medical, surgical or other means) and other expressions of gender, including dress, speech and mannerisms2 CISGENDER Cisgender people are individuals whose gender expression or gender identity accords with conventional expectations based on the physical sex that they were assigned at birth3 DISCRIMINATION The different treatment of someone, in law or in practice, in a way that impairs or nullifies the enjoyment of their rights, because of a characteristic such as ethnic origin, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity4 GAY Refers to a man who is emotionally and/or sexually attracted to other men 5 GENDER MARKER A gender marker is a gendered designator that appears on an official document such as a passport or an identity card. It may be an explicit designation such as “male” or “female”, a gendered title such like Ms or Mr, a professional title, a gendered pronoun, or a numerical code which uses particular numbers for men and for women (for example, odd numbers and even numbers)6 HATE CRIME A “bias-motivated” crime committed against a person because of their real or perceived identity, or membership of a group, defined by personal characteristics such as disability, ethnicity, gender identity, race, sexual orientation, or social or economic status. 7 HETEROSEXUAL Refers to a person who is sexually and emotionally attracted to people of a different gender HOMOPHOBIA Unreasonable anger, intolerance or hatred toward homosexuality8 HOMOSEXUAL Refers to a person who is sexually and emotionally attracted to people of the same gender 1 ILGA Europe, “ILGA-Europe Glossary,” ILGA Europe, accessed August 25, 2017, http://old.ilga- europe.org/home/publications/glossary. 2 The Yogyakarta Principles, “The Yogyakarta Principles: Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity,” 2007, 6, http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/principles_en.htm. 3 Amnesty International, “The State Decides Who I Am: Lack of Gender Recognition for Transgender People in Europe” (London: Amnesty International, 2014), 16. 4 Amnesty International, “Armenia: No Space for Difference” (London: Amnesty International, 2013), 10. 5 ILGA Europe, “ILGA-Europe Glossary.” 6 Amnesty International, “The State Decides Who I Am: Lack of Gender Recognition for Transgender People in Europe,” 16. 7 See Amnesty International, “Targeted by Hate, Forgotten by Law: Lack of a Coherent Response to Hate Crimes in Poland” (London: Amnesty International, 2015), 9, for a detailed list of the international standards on hate crimes. 8 ILGA Europe, “ILGA-Europe Glossary.” LESS EQUAL LGBTI HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN ARMENIA, BELARUS, KAZAKHSTAN, AND KYRGYZSTAN Amnesty International 6 WORD DESCRIPTION HRD Human Rights Defender. Amnesty International considers an HRD to be any person who, individually or in association with others, acts to defend and/or promote human rights at the local, national, regional or international levels, without resorting to or advocating hatred, discrimination or violence INTERSEX An umbrella term used to describe a person whose genital, gonadal, chromosomal or hormonal characteristics do not correspond to the given standard for male or female categories of sexual or reproductive anatomy. Intersex variations may take different forms and cover a wide range of traits. The terms intersex bodied, intersexed or intersexuality can also be ways of naming the diversity of sex characteristics9 LESBIAN Refers to a woman who is sexually and emotionally attracted to other women 10 LGBTI Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex MSM Men who have sex with men (but don’t necessarily identify as gay or bisexual)11 “OUT” Being openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex. To “come out” is to reveal one’s identification as a lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans or intersex person. To be “outed” is when a person’s identification as lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans or intersex person is revealed without consent12 QUEER An umbrella term that encompasses many identities and roles that do not fit within heteronormative and cisnormative frameworks. Queer theory challenges social norms concerning gender and sexuality, and claims that gender roles are social constructions.13 SEXUAL Each person’s capacity for profound emotional, affectional and sexual ORIENTATION attraction to, and intimate and sexual relations with, individuals of a different gender or the same gender or more than one gender14 SOGI Sexual orientation and gender identity TRANSGENDER Transgender, or trans, people are individuals whose gender expression or gender identity differs from conventional expectations based on the physical sex they were assigned at birth.
Recommended publications
  • DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 Response
    DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 response Weekly situation update Date: 22 May 2020 Key statistics As of 22 May 2020 Total cases Total number of 1350 1600 confirmed cases of 1400 1350 COVID-19 1200 1111 1000 The number of new 37 906 cases from total 800 756 656 600 554 The number of human 14 400 419 losses 200 147216 0 The number of 949 recovered cases On 18 March 2020 the first three cases were recorded in the Kyrgyz Republic that were detected among those, who returned from Umra pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Kyrgyzstan’s Security Council recommended the state of emergency on 22 March, and the Government subsequently imposed stricter measures, placing checkpoints in every region and city, and shutting down facilities (cafes, cinemas, shopping malls, and other entertainment places), leaving only grocery stores, food markets, pharmacies, and medical Daily trend of COVID-19 new Confirmed cases facilities. as of 22 May 2020 As of 22 May 2020, 1,350 cases of COVID-19 100 have been confirmed in the Kyrgyz Republic 80 and 14 deaths. Please also see in the table age disaggregation among the confirmed 60 cases as of 15 May 2020. Out of total 40 confirmed cases: cases among women- 685 (51%), cases among men – 665 (49%). 20 Number of laboratory test in the last day - 2 . 0 The number of contacts with laboratory- confirmed patients with covid-19 is 6,600 and 2,150 people are on observation. The emergency state was expired on 10 May, but it was decided to leave the emergency regime and quarantine in Bishkek and Osh cities, in At-Bashi district of the Naryn region and in the rural district of Kanysh-Kiya Chatkal district of the Jalal-Abad region.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia: Confronting Independence
    THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY OF RICE UNIVERSITY UNLOCKING THE ASSETS: ENERGY AND THE FUTURE OF CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS CENTRAL ASIA: CONFRONTING INDEPENDENCE MARTHA BRILL OLCOTT SENIOR RESEARCH ASSOCIATE CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENERGY STUDY BY THE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY AND THE JAMES A. BAKER III INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RICE UNIVERSITY – APRIL 1998 CENTRAL ASIA: CONFRONTING INDEPENDENCE Introduction After the euphoria of gaining independence settles down, the elites of each new sovereign country inevitably stumble upon the challenges of building a viable state. The inexperienced governments soon venture into unfamiliar territory when they have to formulate foreign policy or when they try to forge beneficial economic ties with foreign investors. What often proves especially difficult is the process of redefining the new country's relationship with its old colonial ruler or federation partners. In addition to these often-encountered hurdles, the newly independent states of Central Asia-- Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan-- have faced a host of particular challenges. Some of these emanate from the Soviet legacy, others--from the ethnic and social fabric of each individual polity. Yet another group stems from the peculiarities of intra- regional dynamics. Finally, the fledgling states have been struggling to step out of their traditional isolation and build relations with states outside of their neighborhood. This paper seeks to offer an overview of all the challenges that the Central Asian countries have confronted in the process of consolidating their sovereignty. The Soviet Legacy and the Ensuing Internal Challenges What best distinguishes the birth of the Central Asian states from that of any other sovereign country is the incredible weakness of pro-independence movements throughout the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Poverty in Central Asia: Kazakhstan Versus Tajikistan
    Global Majority E-Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1 (June 2011), pp. 19-30 Poverty in Central Asia: Kazakhstan versus Tajikistan Gregory Chapman Abstract This article reviews the existence and nature of poverty in the two very different Central Asian nations of Kazakhstan and Tajikistan. Kazakhstan is oil-rich and agriculturally productive. Tajikistan is poor, rural, isolated and mountainous. Summarizing the nature of poverty in these two countries, this article seeks to understand some of the driving factors behind it. Though by no means comprehensive or complete, this article illustrates the vast differences between these two countries of the same ‘neighborhood’ and, sadly, one has great hope of outgrowing poverty and the other has not. I. Introduction Central Asia has long been a so-called ‘crossroads of the world’, a place where ‘east meets west’ in the narrow valleys and of the Tian Shan and on the vast plains of the Steppe.1 Although central to both the 19th century geopolitical struggle known as the ‘Great Game’ as well as to modern energy-driven geopolitics, the region remains little understood - perhaps sheltered by its high mountains and long wind-swept winters, perhaps by its long Soviet past or even by its intricate, ostensibly foreign culture. Though this region is, due to its fragile post-Soviet independence and relative richness in energy reserves, more vital to our own national interests than ever, it is safe to say that most Americans know very little of this ‘land of the Stans’. Despite the seemed wealth of some of the Central Asian nations, particularly Kazakhstan,2 in oil, natural gas and other mineral resources, as well as a relative abundance of arable 1 One of the world’s highest mountainous plateaus, stretching from western China in the east to central Kazakhstan and eastern Uzbekistan in the west.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan Found Over 2 Million Contracted Coronavirus by August
    Electronic supplementary material: The online version of this article contains supplementary material. © 2021 The Author(s) Cite as: Dzushupov K, Lucero-Prisno III DE, Vishnyakov D, Lin X, Ahmadi A. JoGH © 2021 ISGH COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan: Navitating a way out. J Glob Health 2021;11:03020. COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan: Navigating a way out VIEWPOINTS Kenesh Dzushupov1*, Don Eliseo Lucero-Prisno III2,3*, Dmitry Vishnyakov1*, Xu Lin4*, Attaullah Ahmadi5,6* 1Department of Public Health, International School of Medicine, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 2Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom 3Faculty of Management and Development Studies, University of the Philippines (Open University), Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines 4Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, PR China 5Medical Research Center, Kateb University, Kabul, Afghanistan 6Global Health Focus Asia, Kabul, Afghanistan *Equal authorship. he COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest global health crisis of our time [1]. Since the pandemic started in China, in December 2019, the disease has been creeping into almost every country across the globe T[2,3]. The pandemic has led to a global cumulative incident of 47 901 761 confirmed cases, and 1 221 479 deaths by November 4, 2020 [4]. The first case of COVID-19 in Kyrgyzstan, a mountainous land-lock country in Central Asia, was detected on March 18, 2020 [5]. Thereafter the country was plagued with the pandemic and went through a lockdown, declaration of state of emergency, steady case increase and devastating peak of the wave with total 60 279 confirmed cases, 1159 deaths and 51 288 recoveries across the country by Novem- ber 4, 2020 [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Culture and Sports in the USSR and Soviet Kazakhstan in 1940-1980
    Opción, Año 35, Especial No.19 (2019): 2337-2365 ISSN 1012-1587/ISSNe: 2477-9385 Physical Culture and Sports in the USSR and Soviet Kazakhstan in 1940-1980 Zauresh Galimzhanovna Saktaganova1, Aleksandr Anatolievich Grigorkevich1, Zhanna Sabitbekovna Mazhitova2, Assem Serikovna Sagatova3, Saule Suyundykovna Kassimova3 1Karaganda State University named after E.A. Buketov, 100028, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Universitetskaya Street, 28 2University of Astana, 010000, Astana, Kazakhstan, Abai Street, 13 3Karaganda State Technical University, 100028, Karaganda, Kazakhstan, Mira Boulevard, 56 Abstrac The present article considers the problems of physical culture and sports in the Soviet history. It emphasizes the fact that physical culture and sports had a complicated history. In the pre-war period, sports were considered to serve a narrow utilitarian purpose of establishing healthy society via doing exerci- ses and training bold fighters for the bright new dawn of communism. Later, sports were perceived as one of the key components of social and political life – an effective means to increase labor productivity and bring up a stron- ger next generation. Analyzing the government actions on establishing sports infrastructure, the authors conclude that physical culture and sports in the USSR and Soviet Kazakhstan transformed into an independent area of cultural development. The conclusion states that high achievements in conventional sports were to prove the benefits of living in a socialist country to its citizens and the rest of the world. In turn, such a circumstance led to the disregard of sports peculiarities of Kazakhstan and the gradual fallback of national sports. Keywords: Soviet history, physical culture, sports, Soviet Kazakhstan, national sports. 2338 Zauresh Galimzhanovna Saktaganova et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Energy Reserves, Pipeline Routes and the Legal Regime in the Caspian Sea
    3. Energy reserves, pipeline routes and the legal regime in the Caspian Sea John Roberts I. The energy reserves and production potential of the Caspian The issue of Caspian energy development has been dominated by four factors. The first is uncertain oil prices. These pose a challenge both to oilfield devel- opers and to the promoters of pipelines. The boom prices of 2000, coupled with supply shortages within the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), have made development of the resources of the Caspian area very attractive. By contrast, when oil prices hovered around the $10 per barrel level in late 1998 and early 1999, the price downturn threatened not only the viability of some of the more grandiose pipeline projects to carry Caspian oil to the outside world, but also the economics of basic oilfield exploration in the region. While there will be some fly-by-night operators who endeavour to secure swift returns in an era of high prices, the major energy developers, as well as the majority of smaller investors, will continue to predicate total production costs (including carriage to market) not exceeding $10–12 a barrel. The second is the geology and geography of the area. The importance of its geology was highlighted when two of the first four international consortia formed to look for oil in blocks off Azerbaijan where no wells had previously been drilled pulled out in the wake of poor results.1 The geography of the area involves the complex problem of export pipeline development and the chicken- and-egg question whether lack of pipelines is holding back oil and gas pro- duction or vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outcomes of Cooperation of Kazakhstan and Turkey in the Field of Education
    International Journal of Economics and Business Administration Volume V, Issue 4, 2017 pp. 96-103 The Outcomes of Cooperation of Kazakhstan and Turkey in the Field of Education M. Tlebaldiyeva1, T. Sadikov2, G. Kamiyeva3, Z. Moldahmetova4 Abstract: Official relations between Turkey and Kazakhstan were established in December 1990. The Minister of Culture Namik Kemal Zeybek and the Kazakh State Culture Committee signed an agreement for the carrying out of common cultural work between two countries in education system, research projects, exchange experience of experts and scholars in the practice. This agreement regained cultural ties interrupted long time ago. The official visit of the head of the Kazakh State Culture Committee paid to Turkey on the January 31, 1991, and the cooperation agreement signed by the Minister of Health on February 14 of that year strengthened cultural relations between the two countries. Before gaining the independence of Kazakhstan the official visit of the Turkish President Turgut Ozal to Kazakhstan on March 15 and signing the agreement "on the relationship of Kazakh Soviet Socialist Republic and the Republic of Turkey" led to the strengthening friendship Kazakh-Turkish relations and further development in this direction. Keywords: International cooperation, education, agreement, cultural, relationship. 1Master of History, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, [email protected] 2Doctor of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of History L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan. 3Candidate of Pedagogical Science Kazakh Humanities and Law Institute of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan 4Candidate of Pedagogical Science Kazakh Humanities and Law Institute of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Astana, Kazakhstan M.
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Violent Extremism in Kyrgyzstan
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Jacob Zenn and Kathleen Kuehnast This report offers perspectives on the national and regional dynamics of violent extremism with respect to Kyrgyzstan. Derived from a study supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) to explore the potential for violent extremism in Central Asia, it is based on extensive interviews and a Preventing Violent countrywide Peace Game with university students at Kyrgyz National University in June 2014. Extremism in Kyrgyzstan ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jacob Zenn is an analyst on Eurasian and African affairs, a legal adviser on international law and best practices related to civil society and freedom of association, and a nonresident research Summary fellow at the Center of Shanghai Cooperation Organization Studies in China, the Center of Security Programs in Kazakhstan, • Kyrgyzstan, having twice overthrown autocratic leaders in violent uprisings, in 2005 and again and The Jamestown Foundation in Washington, DC. Dr. Kathleen in 2010, is the most politically open and democratic country in Central Asia. Kuehnast is a sociocultural anthropologist and an expert on • Many Kyrgyz observers remain concerned about the country’s future. They fear that underlying Kyrgyzstan, where she conducted field work in the early 1990s. An adviser on the Central Asia Fellows Program at the socioeconomic conditions and lack of public services—combined with other factors, such as Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington drug trafficking from Afghanistan, political manipulation, regional instability in former Soviet University, she is a member of the Council on Foreign Union countries and Afghanistan, and foreign-imported religious ideologies—create an envi- Relations and has directed the Center for Gender and ronment in which violent extremism can flourish.
    [Show full text]
  • Automatic Exchange of Information: Status of Commitments
    As of 27 September 2021 AUTOMATIC EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION (AEOI): STATUS OF COMMITMENTS1 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES IN 2017 (49) Anguilla, Argentina, Belgium, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Cayman Islands, Colombia, Croatia, Cyprus2, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Faroe Islands, Finland, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Montserrat, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, San Marino, Seychelles, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2018 (51) Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan3, The Bahamas, Bahrain, Barbados, Belize, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, China, Cook Islands, Costa Rica, Curacao, Dominica4, Greenland, Grenada, Hong Kong (China), Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Lebanon, Macau (China), Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Monaco, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue4, Pakistan3, Panama, Qatar, Russia, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sint Maarten4, Switzerland, Trinidad and Tobago4, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay, Vanuatu JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2019 (2) Ghana3, Kuwait5 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2020 (3) Nigeria3, Oman5, Peru3 JURISDICTIONS UNDERTAKING FIRST EXCHANGES BY 2021 (3) Albania3, 7, Ecuador3, Kazakhstan6
    [Show full text]
  • The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: a Legacy of Soviet Imperialism
    Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 4 6-1-2021 The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism Liam Abbate Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc Recommended Citation Abbate, Liam (2021) "The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism," Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc/vol4/iss1/4 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abbate: The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism dispute, particularly in relation to the U.S.- The Kyrgyzstan- China rivalry. Uzbekistan Border: Background A Legacy of Soviet Kyrgyzstan is among the poorest of the nations of Central Asia: its per capita is a Imperialism mere tenth of its larger neighbor LIAM ABBATE Kazakhstan.1 Formerly a constituent republic of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics, the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic declared independence as Abstract Kyrgyzstan on August 31, 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Central Asia
    ENGAGING CENTRAL ASIA ENGAGING CENTRAL ASIA THE EUROPEAN UNION’S NEW STRATEGY IN THE HEART OF EURASIA EDITED BY NEIL J. MELVIN CONTRIBUTORS BHAVNA DAVE MICHAEL DENISON MATTEO FUMAGALLI MICHAEL HALL NARGIS KASSENOVA DANIEL KIMMAGE NEIL J. MELVIN EUGHENIY ZHOVTIS CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute based in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound analytical research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe today. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors writing in a personal capacity and do not necessarily reflect those of CEPS or any other institution with which the authors are associated. This study was carried out in the context of the broader work programme of CEPS on European Neighbourhood Policy, which is generously supported by the Compagnia di San Paolo and the Open Society Institute. ISBN-13: 978-92-9079-707-4 © Copyright 2008, Centre for European Policy Studies. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies. Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels Tel: 32 (0) 2 229.39.11 Fax: 32 (0) 2 219.41.51 e-mail: [email protected] internet: http://www.ceps.eu CONTENTS 1. Introduction Neil J. Melvin ................................................................................................. 1 2. Security Challenges in Central Asia: Implications for the EU’s Engagement Strategy Daniel Kimmage............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Regulatory and Procedural Barriers to Trade in Kazakhstan
    UNECE UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan - Needs Needs Assessment Assessment Information Service United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Palais des Nations UNITED NA CH - 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Telephone: +41(0)22 917 44 44 Fax: +41(0)22 917 05 05 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.unece.org TIONS Printed at United Nations, Geneva GE.14-22004–May 2014–150 UNITED NATIONS ECE/TRADE/407 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan Needs Assessment United Nations New York and Geneva, 2014 2 Regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in Kazakhstan Needs Assessment Note The designation employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the ex- pression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers of boundaries. This study is issued in English and Russian. ECE/TRADE/407 Copyright © 2014 United Nations and International Trade Centre All rights reserved Foreword 3 Foreword The International Trade Center (ITC) and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) are pleased to present the needs assessment study of regulatory and procedural barriers to trade in the Republic of Kazakhstan. We would also like to express our appreciation to Kazakhstan’s Centre for Trade Policy Development under the Ministry of Economic Development, which cooperated with both ITC and UNECE in preparing the study.
    [Show full text]