DOCSLIB.ORG

South Africa's Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

South Africa’s Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas STATUS REPORT 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS THANKS TO OUR DONORS Government departments: CapeNature; City of Cape Town; Eastern Cape Parks and Tourism Acknowledgements Agency; Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife; Free State Department of Tourism, Economic Develop- ment and Environmental Affairs; Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 Limpopo Department of Economic Development, Environment and Tourism; Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency; National Department of Environmental Affairs; North West Parks and Tourism Board; and South African National Parks. ACRONYMS 3 Rupert Nature Foundation Partners: Animal Demography Unit; BirdLife International; BirdLife Partnership African Secretariat; BACKGROUND 4 Endangered Wildlife Trust; Overberg Lowlands Conservation Trust; Percy FitzPatrick Institute of Objectives of the IBA Status Report 4 African Ornithology; NCC Environmental Services; South African National Biodiversity Institute; What are IBAs? 5 University of Cape Town; Wildlife and Environment Society of South Africa; and World Wide Fund for Aims of the IBA Programme 6 Nature–South Africa. How are IBAs identified? 6 Charmaine Uys is thanked for her valuable contribution to BirdLife South Africa’s IBA Programme Monitoring the state of IBAs 7 while she was the regional conservation manager for Mpumalanga and Free State, including Key Biodiversity Areas 7 collecting data that contributed to this report. Jack MitcHELL Thank you to all the private and provincial nature reserve managers, private landowners, METHODOLOGY 9 ornithologists, birders and bird clubs, ‘Friends of’ groups, regional bird club forums and regional South Africa’s Important Bird and conservation committees who assisted with support, land access, providing information and SOUTH AFRICA’S IBAs 10 Biodiversity Areas Status Report 2015 collecting data. Without the financial support of our donors (see alongside), none of these IBA assessments would Published by BirdLife South Africa RESULTS & DISCUSSION 14 have been possible. Special thanks go to Mitsui & Co. Ltd, which funded many of the IBA assessments Compiled by Daniel Marnewick, State 14 Ernst Retief, Nicholas Theron, Dale Wright and the IBA review processes, and specifically the production of this first IBA Status Report. Edited by Leni Martin Pressure 16 Design by Bryony van Wyk Response 18 Cover photograph Knysna Turaco by BIRDLIFE SOUTH AFRICA In line with BirdLife Chris van Rooyen irdLife South Africa is a Country Partner of International, BirdLife CASE STUDIES 20 BirdLife International; is a registered Non-Profit South Africa commits: Thanks go to all the photographers who B IBAs are a tool for landscape conservation 20 have provided, at no cost, their images for Organisation and Public Benefit Organisation; and 1. To preventing extinctions in the wild. Best management practices for IBAs 21 this publication. Copyright remains with is the only dedicated bird conservation NGO in 2. To maintaining, and where possible improving, Protecting IBAs 22 the individual photographers. South Africa. BirdLife South Africa promotes the the conservation status of all bird species. conservation, enjoyment and understanding of 3. To conserving the sites and habitats important Threats to IBAs 23 Copyright © BirdLife South Africa 2015 birds and their habitats, which is achieved through for birds and other biodiversity. Supporting IBAs 24 Recommended citation a membership network of more than 6 000 4. To sustaining the vital ecological systems that Marnewick MD, Retief EF, Wright DR, members and 32 bird clubs, and through underpin human livelihoods and enrich the RECOMMENDATIONS 26 Theron NT. 2015. South Africa’s Important conservation, avitourism, lobbying, advocacy, quality of people’s lives. Bird and Biodiversity Areas Status Report Recommendations for Government 27 community conservation and education 5. In the process, BirdLife will empower people 2015. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Africa. programmes. As a BirdLife Country Partner, and contribute to the alleviation of poverty, and Contacts 28 BirdLife South Africa, Private Bag X5000, BirdLife South Africa accesses the expertise and will strive to ensure sustainability in the use of Digital Resources 28 Parklands 2121, South Africa global network of BirdLife International. natural resources. Tel. +27 11 789 1122 References 29 Fax +27 11 789 5188 E-mail [email protected] SECRETARYBIRD ALBERT FRONEMAN Website www.birdlife.org.za 1 EXECUTivE SUmmARY this publication any of the BirdLife International Country Partners use IBA assessments to generate IBA aims to provide Status and Trends reports. BirdLife International has used these country reports to “ Mpublish its own reports on the state of the IBA network across regions (such as an overview of southern Africa). This is South Africa’s first IBA Status Report and it will set the benchmark for future IBA Status and Trends reports, which will be published every four to five years. the state of the As a Country Partner to BirdLife International, BirdLife South Africa is responsible for the habitats in IBAs, management of the IBA Programme in South Africa. One of the programme’s objectives is to assess and monitor IBAs as well as coordinate and implement conservation actions within them. ALBERT FRONEMAN (5) the pressures South Africa’s revised network (2015) of 112 IBAs currently spans approximately 14 136 750 ha. Of themes, such as management, protection and monitoring. In conclusion, the report makes LEFT TO RIGHT Yellow-billed Stork is Endangered on the sites and these IBAs, only 51 (46%) are fully protected, while 33 (29%) have partial protection and 28 (25%) recommendations to stakeholders in order to guide their policy-making and management so and found in high numbers in IBAs such as Ndumo are completely unprotected. For the most part, this unprotected land is privately owned. that IBAs may be successfully protected for the conservation of birds and other biodiversity in Game Reserve and iSimangaliso Wetland Park. the conserva- IBAs are sites of global significance for bird conservation. They are identified nationally by the long term. This supports the ultimate aim of the IBA Programme, which is to mainstream Ludwig’s Bustard is also Endangered and occurs experts using globally standardised and scientifically agreed criteria. These are based on the IBAs into conservation planning, decision-making and action. The report’s target audience in drier IBAs in the Northern Cape. Southern Bald Ibis is Vulnerable and many of its breeding sites tion action significant presence of globally and regionally threatened bird species, assemblages of therefore comprises government departments and agencies, conservation organisations and are under threat. Pink-backed Pelican can be seen taken to miti- restricted-range and biome-restricted species, and large concentrations of congregatory environmental practitioners. in large numbers in the iSimangaliso Wetland species. Often, IBAs also have a significant role to play in the conservation of other biodiversity The three variables considered when monitoring the IBAs were the State (condition of the Park IBA. gate the threats and ecosystem services, including the provision of fresh water. habitats), Pressures (threats to the IBA’s habitats and birds), and the Response (management, As the first IBA Status Report for South Africa, this publication aims to provide an overview of mitigation, etc.) at the IBA. the state of the habitats in IBAs, the pressures on the sites and the conservation action taken to The habitat types found to be in the worst state are wetlands, grasslands and shrublands The Tsitsikama–Plettenberg Bay IBA was recently mitigate the threats. It gives a summary and analysis of data gathered for all 112 IBAs and (hereafter referred to as ‘fynbos’). This was true of all IBAs holding these habitats, but most notably expanded to include the Robberg peninsula.” presents these data by protection classes. It provides best-practice case studies across various in those IBAs that are partially protected or unprotected. Modification of the natural systems by excessive or unregulated fire and by grazing is a severe threat common to all IBAs. Partially protected and unprotected IBAs face high levels of pressure from agriculture and from invasive alien and other problem species (e.g. Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia in wetlands, and Eucalyptus and Pinus plantations). Invasive species also pose ACRONYMS a high level of threat to fully protected IBAs. Although conservation AEWA African-Eurasian Flyways Agreement response is, not surprisingly, higher in protected IBAs, there are signs that a BIRP Birds in Reserves Project lack of resources means that formal protection does not always result in CBD Convention on Biological Diversity effective conservation management. And while partially protected and CMS Convention on Migratory Species unprotected IBAs score low for conservation response, there are small but CWAC Co-ordinated Water Bird Counts encouraging signs that action is being taken in them nonetheless. DEA Department of Environmental Affairs Birds are good indicators of the health of ecosystems and habitats. By DEAT Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism monitoring both the presence of birds and the condition of the habitats DMR Department of Mineral Resources in IBAs, this report can demonstrate effectively which habitat types are EIA Environmental Impact Assessment most threatened
Recommended publications
  • Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton

    Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic Sedimentary Sequence Stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton

    Marine and Petroleum Geology 33 (2012) 92e116 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine and Petroleum Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpetgeo Meso-Archaean and Palaeo-Proterozoic sedimentary sequence stratigraphy of the Kaapvaal Craton Adam J. Bumby a,*, Patrick G. Eriksson a, Octavian Catuneanu b, David R. Nelson c, Martin J. Rigby a,1 a Department of Geology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa b Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Canada c SIMS Laboratory, School of Natural Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia article info abstract Article history: The Kaapvaal Craton hosts a number of Precambrian sedimentary successions which were deposited Received 31 August 2010 between 3105 Ma (Dominion Group) and 1700 Ma (Waterberg Group) Although younger Precambrian Received in revised form sedimentary sequences outcrop within southern Africa, they are restricted either to the margins of the 27 September 2011 Kaapvaal Craton, or are underlain by orogenic belts off the edge of the craton. The basins considered in Accepted 30 September 2011 this work are those which host the Witwatersrand and Pongola, Ventersdorp, Transvaal and Waterberg Available online 8 October 2011 strata. Many of these basins can be considered to have formed as a response to reactivation along lineaments, which had initially formed by accretion processes during the amalgamation of the craton Keywords: Kaapvaal during the Mid-Archaean. Faulting along these lineaments controlled sedimentation either directly by Witwatersrand controlling the basin margins, or indirectly by controlling the sediment source areas. Other basins are Ventersdorp likely to be more controlled by thermal affects associated with mantle plumes.
  • South African Schools Act: National Norms

    South African Schools Act: National Norms

    Reproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer’s Copyright Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 w ~ , ," , 'Pt . ... ,"" ... " ..., ".' 'G ~~YI PER A,ia'Dt.Ji::e o " ' ; ~S"01SCHOOL . ~18 ; . ,; -- " ' . DIS~ICT ~ft i -: aWii1l..E " : ~ ~' ~F SCHOOL.'- ~: , .',,'.: ..tu\M: =; : ,~ ~ .. f:'- • , ' :Nl!MBERS. :;'~krrl'-"'·" ~'~ . ~'~:--r:'"-" _ 0( '~.,L.. · ·JI' .·1'!,.. .. ~. ALlQCATtOH :::'~ _ ~~" ~· ~ .s~y:, 4 1 . '" ~"oER . o·C"~;:}~~;t~ _ ~-- ~ < ~~?;:J':: , -- I • 'f. , .... ;,'; • \ " ;( ~ . '" , .:••• • "1 ••• •; ~ ,~ 20ft},..... "',. £OD9" . ... , . " .... ,' ! . .... ...... • . , .. z '. ', . o 800007906 KHUPHUKANI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY RUSTFONTEIN FARM. GERT SIBANDE 2 36 R 740 w 800007898 KHUPHUKANI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY E 1874 , FERNIE A GERT SIBANDE 2 269 R 740 ...... ~ 800007963 KHUTSONG PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY STAND N02832 . NEU-HALLE NKANGALA 2 378 R 740 <0 800029652 KING MAKHOSONKE II SECONDARY SCHOOL SECONDARY 1779 MOlOTO EXT 2 , MOLOTO NORTH NKANGALA 2 1075 R 740 CO 800008003 KIWI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KIWI FARM , LYDENBURG EHLANZENI 2 122 R 740 800008029 KLEINSKUUR PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KLEINSKUUR FARM , BALFOUR GERT SIBANDE 2 22 R 740 800008417 KOBI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY MZINTI TRUST , STAND NO 496 EHLANZENI 2 502 R740 800008433 KOMATIDRAAI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY TSB FARM, KOMATIDRAAI EHLANZENI 2 43 R 740 800008441 KOME PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY MAJATLADI SECTION, LEFISWANE VILLAGE NKANGALA 2 344 R 740 800008524 KROMDRAAI PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY HLALANIKAHLE EXTENSION 4 , EMALAHLENI NKANGALA 2 743 R 740 800008532 KROMKRANS PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KROMKRANSFARM , BREYTON GERT SIBANDE 2 17 R 740 oG) 800008599 KUSILE PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY NHLALAKAHLE , KABOKWENI EHLANZENI 2 389 R 740 < 2 779 R 740 m 800034784 KWACHIBIKHULU PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY KWACHIBIKHULU TOWNSHIP, CHRISSIESMEER GERT SIBANDE J) 300008656 KWl\GUQ,A.
  • Herpetofaunal Survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the Foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

    Herpetofaunal Survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the Foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa

    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 717-730 (2020) (published online on 25 August 2020) Herpetofaunal survey of the Ongeluksnek (Malekgalonyane) Nature Reserve in the foothills of the Drakensberg, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa Werner Conradie1,2,* Brian Reeves3, Sandile Mdoko3, Lwandiso Pamla3, and Oyama Gxabhu3 Abstract. The results of a herpetofaunal survey of Ongeluksnek Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa are presented here. Combination of visual encounter survey methods and standard Y-shape trap arrays were used to conduct the survey. A total of 26 species (eight amphibians and 18 reptiles) were recorded, representing 29 quarter-degree grid cell records, of which 62% represented the first records for these units. Furthermore, we document the presence of three species of snakes (Crotaphopeltis hotamboeia, Hemachatus haemachatus and Homoroselaps lacteus) for the first time for the whole degree square of 3028 (approx. 100 km2). This study highlights the need to survey poorly known regions to enable us to understand and document the full distributional extent of species. We also discuss the impact of uncontrolled fires on the absence of grassland specialised species during our survey. Keywords. Amphibia, Reptilia, karroid, conservation, biodiversity, fire Introduction has been done in the southern and western regions (e.g. Branch and Braack, 1987), while the northern and The herpetofaunal richness of South Africa is central areas associated with the former homelands of considered to be amongst the highest in the world the Ciskei and Transkei remained poorly surveyed. In (Branch, 1998; Bates et al., 2014; Du Preez and recent years a series of rapid biodiversity studies has Carruthers, 2017; Tolley et al., 2019).
  • Tulbagh Renosterveld Project Report

    Tulbagh Renosterveld Project Report

    BP TULBAGH RENOSTERVELD PROJECT Introduction The Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is the smallest and richest floral kingdom of the world. In an area of approximately 90 000km² there are over 9 000 plant species found (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). The CFR is recognized as one of the 33 global biodiversity hotspots (Myers, 1990) and has recently received World Heritage Status. In 2002 the Cape Action Plan for the Environment (CAPE) programme identified the lowlands of the CFR as 100% irreplaceable, meaning that to achieve conservation targets all lowland fragments would have to be conserved and no further loss of habitat should be allowed. Renosterveld , an asteraceous shrubland that predominantly occurs in the lowland areas of the CFR, is the most threatened vegetation type in South Africa . Only five percent of this highly fragmented vegetation type still remains (Von Hase et al 2003). Most of these Renosterveld fragments occur on privately owned land making it the least represented vegetation type in the South African Protected Areas network. More importantly, because of the fragmented nature of Renosterveld it has a high proportion of plants that are threatened with extinction. The Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers (CREW) project, which works with civil society groups in the CFR to update information on threatened plants, has identified the Tulbagh valley as a high priority for conservation action. This is due to the relatively large amount of Renosterveld that remains in the valley and the high amount of plant endemism. The CAPE program has also identified areas in need of fine scale plans and the Tulbagh area falls within one of these: The Upper Breede River planning domain.
  • The Geology of the Olifants River Area, Transvaal

    The Geology of the Olifants River Area, Transvaal

    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VANSUID-AFRIKA· DEPARTMENT OF MINES DEPARTEMENT VAN MYNWESE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIESE OPNAME THE GEOLOGY OF THE OLIFANTS RIVER AREA, TRANSVAAL AN EXPLANATION OF SHEETS 2429B (CHUNIESPOORT) AND 2430A (WOLKBERG) by J. S. I. Sehwellnus, D.Se., L. N. J. Engelbrecht, B.Sc., F. J. Coertze, B.Sc. (Hons.), H. D. Russell, B.Sc., S. J. Malherbe, B.Sc. (Hons.), D. P. van Rooyen, B.Sc., and R. Cooke, B.Sc. Met 'n opsomming in Afrikaans onder die opskrif: DIE GEOLOGIE VAN DIE GEBIED OLIFANTSRIVIER, TRANSVAAL COPYRIGHT RESERVED/KOPIEREG VOORBEHOU (1962) Printed by and obtainable (rom Gedruk deur en verkrygbaar the Government Printer, B(ls~ van die Staatsdrukker, Bosman­ man Street, Pretoria. straat, Pretoria. Geological map in colour on a Geologiese kaart in kleur op 'n scale of I: 125,000 obtainable skaal van I: 125.000 apart ver­ separately at the price of 60c. krygbaar teen die prys van 60c. & .r.::-~ h'd'~, '!!~l p,'-' r\ f: ~ . ~) t,~ i"'-, i CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT ........................ ' ••• no ..........' ........" ... • • • • • • • • •• 1 I. INTRODUCTION........ •.••••••••.••••••••.....••...•.•..••••..• 3 II. PHYSIOGRAPHY................................................ 4 A. ToPOGRAPHY..... • • . • • . • . • • . • • • . • • . • . • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • ... 4 B. DRAINAGE.................................................... 6 C. CLIMATE ..........•.••••.•••••.••....................... ,.... 7 D. VEGETATION .••••.•••••.•.........•..... , ..............•... , . 7 III. GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS ....................
  • Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial District Ermelo Main Seat of Msukaligwa Magisterial District

    Proposed Main Seat / Sub District Within the Proposed Magisterial District Ermelo Main Seat of Msukaligwa Magisterial District

    # # !C # # ### !C^ !.C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # # # ^ # # ^ # # !C # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # !C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # #!C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # !C # !C # #^ # # # # # # ## # #!C # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # !C# ## # # # # # !C # # !C# # # # #^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # # # # ## # # # # # # ## # ## #!C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ## # # ## # # # # # # !C # # # ##!C ## ## ## # # # # # # # # # #^ # # ## # # # !C # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # ## # ##^ # !C #!C## # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # ## # # # !C# ^ ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # !C # #!C # # #!C # # !C## # # # # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # ## ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # #!C # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # ^!C # # # # # ^ # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # #!C # # !C # # !C ## # # # # #!C # # # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C# # ## # ## # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # ### #!C# # # !C !C# # !C # ## # # # # # # # # !C# # !.# # # # ## ## # #!C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ### ##^ # # # # # # # ## # # # # ^ # !C# ## # # # # # # !C## # ## # # # # ## # # # # # ## # # # # #!C## !C# # !C# ## # !C### # # ^ # # # !C ### # # # !C# ##!C # !C # # # ^ !C ## # # #!C # ## ## # # ## # # # # # # ## !C# # # # # # # # ## # # # # # !C # ## ## # # # # !C # # ^ # ## # ## # # # !.!C ## # # ## # # # # !C # # !C# # ### # # # # # # # # # # ## !C # # # # ## !C #
  • Epigaeic Invertebrate Community Structure in Two Subtropical Nature Reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for Conservation Management

    Epigaeic Invertebrate Community Structure in Two Subtropical Nature Reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for Conservation Management

    © Arachnologische Gesellschaft e.V. Frankfurt/Main; http://arages.de/ Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 52: 7-15 Karlsruhe, September 2016 Epigaeic invertebrate community structure in two subtropical nature reserves, Eastern Cape, South Africa: Implications for conservation management Augustine S. Niba & Inam Yekwayo doi: 10.5431/aramit5203 Abstract. Epigaeic invertebrates were sampled at non-invaded (‘Indigenous Forest’ and ‘Indigenous Grassland’) and alien-invaded (‘Eu- calyptus’ and ‘Mixed alien’) sub-sites in the Nduli and Luchaba Nature Reserves using pitfall traps. A total of 2054 specimens belonging to three phyla (Arthropoda, Mollusca and Annelida) was caught and sorted into seven orders, 18 families, one tribe, 45 genera (22 identified to species level) and 20 morphospecies. Higher species richness occurred in ‘Indigenous Forest’ and ‘Mixed Alien’ sub-sites while higher specimen counts were made in invaded (‘Mixed Alien’ and ‘Eucalyptus’) sub-sites during summer months, peaking in January. Canonical Correspondence Analysis results show that some measured site variables, e.g. litter depth, grazing intensity, percentage of alien vege- tation cover, and soil chemical properties accounted for invertebrate taxa composition and distribution trends at sub-sites. Although habitat-patch level characteristics (including abiotic factors) were important for determining species distributions, increased levels of infestation by invasive alien vegetation across sub-sites did not necessarily impact on epigaeic invertebrates
  • Animal Demography Unit to WHOM IT MAY

    Animal Demography Unit to WHOM IT MAY

    Animal Demography Unit Department of Biological Sciences University of Cape Town Rondebosch 7701 South Africa www.adu.org.za Tel. +27 (0)21 650 3227 [email protected] DIGITAL BIODIVERSITY•CITIZEN SCIENCE•BIODIVERSITY INFORMATICS 30 September 2015 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN The Second Southern African Bird Atlas (SABAP2) was launched in Namibia in May 2012. The project is an update and extension of the first Southern African Bird Atlas Project (SABAP1) which ran from 1987–1991, and included six countries of southern Africa, including Namibia. It culminated in the publication of the Atlas of Southern African Birds in 1997. The bird atlas project in Namibia is partnership between the Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism, the Namibia Bird Club and the Animal Demography Unit, University of Cape Town (ADU). The project plans to run indefinitely. The broad aim of the project is to determine the distribution and abundance of bird species in Namibia, and to investigate how environmental change and development have impacted bird distributions over the past quarter of a century. It also aims to promote public awareness of birds through large-scale mobilization of ‘citizen scientists’. The project entails volunteer bird- watchers recording bird species in five-minute grid cells (approx. 8 km × 9 km) called pentads. This information is then sent to the Animal Demography Unit at the University of Cape Town where the data is captured into a central database. It is important for observers to try and cover as much of the grid cells as possible in order for an accurate and comprehensive bird list to be compiled for the area.
  • Fruit Nutritional Composition and Non-Nutritive Traits of Indigenous South African Tree Species ⁎ A.-L

    Fruit Nutritional Composition and Non-Nutritive Traits of Indigenous South African Tree Species ⁎ A.-L

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 78 (2012) 30–36 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Fruit nutritional composition and non-nutritive traits of indigenous South African tree species ⁎ A.-L. Wilson, C.T. Downs School of Biological and Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa Received 12 January 2011; received in revised form 11 April 2011; accepted 13 April 2011 Abstract Frugivorous animals play a major role in dispersing tropical, and to a lesser extent, temperate tree species. In order to attract potential seed dispersers, plants generally offer a reward of fleshy fruit pulp. Criteria for fruit choice by avian frugivores are influenced by a number of non- nutritive (e.g. fruit size and colour) factors; and nutritional composition of the fruit. There is a paucity of nutritional composition and other fruit trait data of indigenous South African fruit. This information is necessary in order to determine which frugivores are likely to ingest which fruits and consequently act as potential seed dispersal agents. This information would provide us with an understanding of the inter-relationships between indigenous fruit and frugivores in South Africa. Consequently nutritional composition was investigated in various indigenous fruit species that avian frugivores feed on. Fruits were collected from 38 indigenous tree species found in KwaZulu-Natal Afromontane and coastal forests. Pulp was freeze-dried to constant mass and then analysed for sugar, lipid and protein content; and for water content determination. Fruit width in this study ranged from 4 mm (Searsia rehmanniana and Trema orientalis)to40mm(Annona senegalensis, Ficus sur and Xylotheca kraussiana).
  • Fire Management

    Fire Management

    FACT SHEET The Landowner’s Guide to FIRE MANAGEMENT eriodic natural fires have always occurred in fynbos and probably in renosterveld systems too. Many plants actually need fires to reproduce and ensure their long-term survival. The Pchallenge now is to use fire in a fragmented and highly modified modern landscape to ensure the survival of all plant and animal species that live in the landscape. Although fynbos is a fire-adapted system, just one or two inappropriate fires at the wrong time of year or wrong frequency, can cause the local extinction of many species. The most important use of fire for conservation management is to maintain viable populations of all existing plant and animal species. The use of fire to achieve other management objectives should always take this into account. These may include: reduction in fuel load to prevent unmanageable wildfires, the control of invasive alien plants, increase in water yield from catchments, promoting desirable plants for the flower picking industry, or improving grazing. Principles of Fire Management Frequency can contain a high proportion of grasses, which are fast- growing and highly flammable, renosterveld can be The interval between fires should largely be deter- burned more frequently than fynbos, possibly every mined by the growth rate of existing plants. No fire three to 10 years. However, renosterveld is far less should be permitted in fynbos until at least 50% dependent on fire than fynbos. of the population of the slowest-maturing species in an area have flowered for at least Light is important for bulb flowering and the germina- three successive seasons.
  • Recognition and Management of Ecological Refugees: a Case Study of the Cape Mountain Zebra

    Recognition and Management of Ecological Refugees: a Case Study of the Cape Mountain Zebra

    Biological Conservation 203 (2016) 207–215 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biological Conservation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bioc Recognition and management of ecological refugees: A case study of the Cape mountain zebra Jessica MD Lea a,b,⁎, Graham IH Kerley c, Halszka Hrabar c,TomJBarryd, Susanne Shultz a a Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, UK b Chester Zoo, Caughall Road, Upton-by-Chester CH2 1LH, UK c Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, PO Box 77000, NMMU, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa d Gamka Mountain Nature Reserve, Western Cape Nature Conservation Board, Oudtshoorn 6620, South Africa article info abstract Article history: Anthropogenic activities have led to long-term range contraction in many species, creating isolated populations Received 19 February 2016 in ecologically marginal and suboptimal habitats. ‘Refugee’ species have a current distribution completely re- Received in revised form 6 September 2016 stricted to suboptimal habitat. However, it is likely that many species are partial refugees, where one or more Accepted 17 September 2016 populations are managed in ecologically unsuitable habitat. Here, we develop a framework to assess potential Available online xxxx refugee populations in marginal habitats using a model species: the Cape mountain zebra. We assessed habitat quality by the abundance and palatability of grass and diet quality using proximate nutrient and element analysis. Keywords: Refugee species High grass abundance was associated with higher population growth rates and zebra density and less skewed Gap species adult sex ratios. Furthermore, faecal nutrient and dietary element quality was also positively associated with Conservation management grass abundance.
  • South Africa Mega Birding Tour I 6Th to 30Th January 2018 (25 Days) Trip Report

    South Africa Mega Birding Tour I 6Th to 30Th January 2018 (25 Days) Trip Report

    South Africa Mega Birding Tour I 6th to 30th January 2018 (25 days) Trip Report Aardvark by Mike Bacon Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Wayne Jones Rockjumper Birding Tours View more tours to South Africa Trip Report – RBT South Africa - Mega I 2018 2 Tour Summary The beauty of South Africa lies in its richness of habitats, from the coastal forests in the east, through subalpine mountain ranges and the arid Karoo to fynbos in the south. We explored all of these and more during our 25-day adventure across the country. Highlights were many and included Orange River Francolin, thousands of Cape Gannets, multiple Secretarybirds, stunning Knysna Turaco, Ground Woodpecker, Botha’s Lark, Bush Blackcap, Cape Parrot, Aardvark, Aardwolf, Caracal, Oribi and Giant Bullfrog, along with spectacular scenery, great food and excellent accommodation throughout. ___________________________________________________________________________________ Despite havoc-wreaking weather that delayed flights on the other side of the world, everyone managed to arrive (just!) in South Africa for the start of our keenly-awaited tour. We began our 25-day cross-country exploration with a drive along Zaagkuildrift Road. This unassuming stretch of dirt road is well-known in local birding circles and can offer up a wide range of species thanks to its variety of habitats – which include open grassland, acacia woodland, wetlands and a seasonal floodplain. After locating a handsome male Northern Black Korhaan and African Wattled Lapwings, a Northern Black Korhaan by Glen Valentine