DOCSLIB.ORG

Pain Management & Spine Surgery Procedures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pain Management & Spine Surgery Procedures OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) CATEGORY PROCCODE PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION Pain Management & Spine Surgery Procedures Spinal 22510 Perq cervicothoracic inject FusionSpinal 22511 Perq lumbosacral injection FusionSpinal 22512 Vertebroplasty addl inject FusionSpinal 22513 Perq vertebral augmentation FusionSpinal 22514 Perq vertebral augmentation FusionSpinal 22515 Perq vertebral augmentation FusionSpinal 22532 LAT THORAX SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22533 LAT LUMBAR SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22534 LAT THOR/LUMB ADDL SEG FusionSpinal 22548 NECK SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22551 NECK SPINE FUSE&REMOV BEL C2 FusionSpinal 22552 ADDL NECK SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22554 NECK SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22556 THORAX SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22558 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22585 ADDITIONAL SPINAL FUSION FusionSpinal 22590 SPINE & SKULL SPINAL FUSION FusionSpinal 22595 NECK SPINAL FUSION FusionSpinal 22600 NECK SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22610 THORAX SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22612 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22614 SPINE FUSION, EXTRA SEGMENT FusionSpinal 22630 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION FusionSpinal 22632 SPINE FUSION, EXTRA SEGMENT FusionSpinal 22633 LUMBAR SPINE FUSION COMBINED FusionSpinal 22634 SPINE FUSION EXTRA SEGMENT FusionSpinal 22800 FUSION OF SPINE FusionSpinal 22802 FUSION OF SPINE FusionSpinal 22804 FUSION OF SPINE FusionSpinal 22808 FUSION OF SPINE FusionSpinal 22810 FUSION OF SPINE FusionSpinal 22812 FUSION OF SPINE FusionSpinal 22818 KYPHECTOMY, 1-2 SEGMENTS FusionSpinal 22819 KYPHECTOMY, 3 OR MORE FusionSpinal 22830 EXPLORATION OF SPINAL FUSION FusionSpinal 22840 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22841 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22842 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22843 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22844 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22845 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22846 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE FusionSpinal 22847 INSERT SPINE FIXATION DEVICE January 2019 Fusion OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) Spinal Fusion 22848 INSERT PELV FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22849 REINSERT SPINAL FIXATION Spinal Fusion 22850 REMOVE SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22852 REMOVE SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22855 REMOVE SPINE FIXATION DEVICE Spinal Fusion 22856 CERV ARTIFIC DISKECTOMY Spinal Fusion 22864 REMOVE CERV ARTIF DISC Spinal Fusion 22899 SPINE SURGERY PROCEDURE Pain Pump 62350 IMPLANT SPINAL CANAL CATH Pain Pump 62351 IMPLANT SPINAL CANAL CATH Pain Pump 62360 INSERT SPINE INFUSION DEVICE Pain Pump 62361 IMPLANT SPINE INFUSION PUMP Pain Pump 62362 IMPLANT SPINE INFUSION PUMP Decompression Surgery 63001 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63003 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63005 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63011 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63012 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63015 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63016 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63017 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63020 NECK SPINE DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63030 LOW BACK DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63035 SPINAL DISK SURGERY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63040 LAMINOTOMY, SINGLE CERVICAL Decompression Surgery 63042 LAMINOTOMY, SINGLE LUMBAR Decompression Surgery 63043 LAMINOTOMY, ADDL CERVICAL Decompression Surgery 63044 LAMINOTOMY, ADDL LUMBAR Decompression Surgery 63045 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63046 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63047 REMOVAL OF SPINAL LAMINA Decompression Surgery 63048 REMOVE SPINAL LAMINA ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63050 CERVICAL LAMINOPLASTY Decompression Surgery 63051 C-LAMINOPLASTY W/GRAFT/PLATE Decompression Surgery 63055 DECOMPRESS SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63056 DECOMPRESS SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63057 DECOMPRESS SPINE CORD ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63064 DECOMPRESS SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63066 DECOMPRESS SPINE CORD ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63075 NECK SPINE DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63076 NECK SPINE DISK SURGERY Decompression Surgery 63077 SPINE DISK SURGERY, THORAX Decompression Surgery 63078 SPINE DISK SURGERY, THORAX Decompression Surgery 63081 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63082 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON January 2019 OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) Decompression Surgery 63085 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63086 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63087 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63088 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63090 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63091 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63101 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63102 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63103 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Decompression Surgery 63170 INCISE SPINAL CORD TRACT(S) Decompression Surgery 63172 DRAINAGE OF SPINAL CYST Decompression Surgery 63173 DRAINAGE OF SPINAL CYST Decompression Surgery 63180 REVISE SPINAL CORD LIGAMENTS Decompression Surgery 63182 REVISE SPINAL CORD LIGAMENTS Decompression Surgery 63185 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN/NERVES Decompression Surgery 63190 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN/NERVES Decompression Surgery 63191 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN/NERVES Decompression Surgery 63194 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63195 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63196 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63197 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63198 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63199 INCISE SPINAL COLUMN & CORD Decompression Surgery 63200 RELEASE OF SPINAL CORD Decompression Surgery 63250 REVISE SPINAL CORD VESSELS Decompression Surgery 63251 REVISE SPINAL CORD VESSELS Decompression Surgery 63252 REVISE SPINAL CORD VESSELS Decompression Surgery 63265 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63266 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63267 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63268 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63270 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63271 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63272 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63273 EXCISE INTRASPINAL LESION Decompression Surgery 63275 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63276 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63277 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63278 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63280 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63281 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63282 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63283 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63285 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63286 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR January 2019 OrthoNet PPA Code List Pain Management and Spine Surgery Procedures AND Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures (Blue Medicare HMO PPO) Decompression Surgery 63287 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63290 BIOPSY/EXCISE SPINAL TUMOR Decompression Surgery 63295 REPAIR OF LAMINECTOMY DEFECT Decompression Surgery 63300 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63301 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63302 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63303 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63304 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63305 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63306 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63307 REMOVAL OF VERTEBRAL BODY Decompression Surgery 63308 REMOVE VERTEBRAL BODY ADD-ON Spinal Cord Stimulator 63650 IMPLANT NEUROELECTRODES Spinal Cord Stimulator 63655 IMPLANT NEUROELECTRODES Spinal Cord Stimulator 63661 REMOVE SPINE ELTRD PERQ ARAY Spinal Cord Stimulator 63662 REMOVE SPINE ELTRD PLATE Spinal Cord Stimulator 63663 REVISE SPINE ELTRD PERQ ARAY Spinal Cord Stimulator 63664 REVISE SPINE ELTRD PLATE Spinal Cord Stimulator 63685 IMPLANT NEURORECEIVER Spinal Cord Stimulator 63688 REVISE/REMOVE NEURORECEIVER Spinal Fusion 22853 INSJ BIOMCHN DEV INTERVERTEBRAL DSC SPC W/ARTHRD Spinal Fusion 22854 INSJ BIOMCHN DEV VRT CORPECTOMY DEFECT W/ARTHRD Spinal Fusion 22859 INSJ BIOMCHN DEV NTRVRT DISC SPACE W/O ARTHRD Spinal Fusion 22867 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/DCMPRN LUMBAR SINGLE LEVEL Spinal Fusion 22868 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/DCMPRN LUMBAR SECOND LEVEL Spinal Fusion 22869 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/O DCMPRN LUMBAR SINGLE LEVEL Spinal Fusion 22870 INSJ STABLJ DEV W/O DCMPRN LUMBAR SECOND LEVEL Pain Pump 62324 NJX DX/THER SBST INTRLMNR CRV/THRC W/O IMG GDN Pain Pump 62325 NJX DX/THER SBST INTRLMNR CRV/THRC W/IMG GDN Pain Pump 62326 NJX DX/THER SBST INTRLMNR LMBR/SAC W/O IMG GDN Pain Pump 62327 NJX DX/THER SBST INTRLMNR LMBR/SAC W/IMG GDN Decompression Surgery 62380 NDSC DCMPRN SPINAL CORD 1 W/LAMOT NTRSPC LUMBAR Pain Pump E0782 NON-PROGRAMBLE INFUSION PUMP Pain Pump E0783 PROGRAMMABLE INFUSION PUMP Pain Pump E0785 REPLACEMENT IMPL PUMP CATHET Pain Pump E0786 IMPLANTABLE PUMP REPLACEMENT Spinal Cord Stimulator L8679 Imp neurosti pls gn any type Spinal Cord Stimulator L8680 IMPLT NEUROSTIM ELCTR EACH Spinal Cord Stimulator L8682 IMPLT NEUROSTIM RADIOFQ REC Major Joint and Foot/ Lower Extremity Procedures
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Modified Plate-Only Open-Door Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Stenotic Myelopathy
    n Feature Article Modified Plate-only Open-door Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Cervical Stenotic Myelopathy LILI YANG, MD; YIFEI GU, MD; JUEQIAN SHI, MD; RUI GAO, MD; YANG LIU, MD; JUN LI, MD; WEN YUAN, MD, PHD abstract Full article available online at Healio.com/Orthopedics. Search: 20121217-23 The purpose of this study was to compare modified plate-only laminoplasty and lami- nectomy and fusion to confirm which of the 2 surgical modalities could achieve a better decompression outcome and whether a significant difference was found in postopera- tive complications. Clinical data were retrospectively reviewed for 141 patients with cervical stenotic myelopathy who underwent plate-only laminoplasty and laminectomy and fusion between November 2007 and June 2010. The extent of decompression was assessed by measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac and the distance of spinal cord drift at the 3 most narrowed levels on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Clinical outcomes and complications were also recorded and compared. Significant en- largement of the dural sac area and spinal cord drift was achieved and well maintained in both groups, but the extent of decompression was greater in patients who underwent Figure: T2-weighted magnetic resonance image laminectomy and fusion; however, a greater decompression did not seem to produce a showing the extent of decompression assessed by better clinical outcome. No significant difference was observed in Japanese Orthopaedic measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac Association and Nurick scores between the 2 groups. Patients who underwent plate-only (arrow). laminoplasty showed a better improvement in Neck Dysfunction Index and visual ana- log scale scores.
    [Show full text]
  • Post–Vertebral Augmentation Back Pain: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Evaluation and Management
    Post–Vertebral Augmentation Back Pain: ORIGINAL RESEARCH Evaluation and Management S. Kamalian BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vertebral augmentation is an established treatment for painful osteo- R. Bordia porotic vertebral fractures of the spine. Nevertheless, patients may continue to have significant back pain afterward. The purpose of this study was to assess the source of persistent or recurrent back pain A.O. Ortiz following vertebral augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our institutional review board approved this study. We evaluated 124 consecutive patients who underwent vertebral augmentation for painful osteoporotic vertebral frac- tures. All patients were evaluated after 3 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year following their procedure. Patients with any type of back pain after their procedure were examined under fluoroscopy. RESULTS: Thirty-four of 124 (27%) patients were men, and 90/124 (73%) were women. Persistent or recurrent back pain, not due to a new fracture or a failed procedure, was present in 29/124 (23%) patients. The source of pain was most often attributed to the sacroiliac and/or lumbar facet joints (25/29 or 86%). Seventeen of 29 (59%) patients experienced immediate relief after facet joint injection of a mixture of steroid and local anesthetic agents. The remaining 12 (41%) had relief after additional injections. Ten (34%) patients ultimately required radio-frequency neurolysis for long-term relief. CONCLUSIONS: Back pain after vertebral augmentation may not be due to a failed procedure but rather to an old or a new pain generator, such as an irritated sacroiliac or lumbar facet joint. This is of importance not only for further pain management of these patients but also for designing trials to compare the efficacy of vertebral augmentation to other treatments.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
    This is a repository copy of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/120113/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Takahashi, T, Pandit, HG orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-8561 and Phil, D (2017) Unicompartmental Knee Replacement. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 4 (2). pp. 55-60. ISSN 0021-8790 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2017.08.009 © 2017 International Society for Knowledge for Surgeons on Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Accepted Manuscript Title: Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Author: Tsuneari Takahashi PII: S2214-9635(17)30041-X DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jajs.2017.08.009 Reference: JAJS 97 To appear in: Authors: Hemant G.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthroscopy - Orthoinfo - AAOS 6/10/12 3:40 PM
    Arthroscopy - OrthoInfo - AAOS 6/10/12 3:40 PM Copyright 2010 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Arthroscopy Arthroscopy is a surgical procedure orthopaedic surgeons use to visualize, diagnose, and treat problems inside a joint. The word arthroscopy comes from two Greek words, "arthro" (joint) and "skopein" (to look). The term literally means "to look within the joint." In an arthroscopic examination, an orthopaedic surgeon makes a small incision in the patient's skin and then inserts pencil-sized instruments that contain a small lens and lighting system to magnify and illuminate the structures inside the joint. Light is transmitted through fiber optics to the end of the arthroscope that is inserted into the joint. By attaching the arthroscope to a miniature television camera, the surgeon is able to see the interior of the joint through this very small incision rather than a large incision needed for surgery. The television camera attached to the arthroscope displays the image of the joint on a television screen, allowing the surgeon to look, for example, throughout the knee. This lets the surgeon see the cartilage, ligaments, and under the kneecap. The surgeon can determine the amount or type of injury and then repair Here are parts of the shoulder joint as or correct the problem, if it is necessary. seen trhough an arthroscope: the rotator cuff (RC), the head fo the humerus Why is arthroscopy necessary? (HH), and the biceps tendon (B). Diagnosing joint injuries and disease begins with a thorough medical history, physical examination, and usually X-rays. Additional tests such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) also scan may be needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Cervical Spine Alignment Following Laminoplasty and Laminectomy
    Spinal Cord (1999) 37, 20± 24 ã 1999 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/sc Analysis of the cervical spine alignment following laminoplasty and laminectomy Shunji Matsunaga1, Takashi Sakou1 and Kenji Nakanisi2 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University; 2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kagoshima University, Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima, Japan Very little detailed biomechanical examination of the alignment of the cervical spine following laminoplasty has been reported. We performed a comparative study regarding the buckling- type alignment that follows laminoplasty and laminectomy to know the mechanical changes in the alignment of the cervical spine. Lateral images of plain roentgenograms of the cervical spine were put into a computer and examined using a program we developed for analysis of the buckling-type alignment. Sixty-four patients who underwent laminoplasty and 37 patients who underwent laminectomy were reviewed retrospectively. The subjects comprised patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and those with ossi®cation of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). The postoperative observation period was 6 years and 7 months on average after laminectomy, and 5 years and 6 months on average following laminoplasty. Development of the buckling-type alignment was found in 33% of patients following laminectomy and only 6% after laminoplasty. Development of buckling-type alignment following laminoplasty appeared markedly less than following laminectomy in both CSM and OPLL patients. These results favor laminoplasty over laminectomy from the aspect of mechanics. Keywords: laminoplasty; laminectomy; buckling; kyphosis; swan-neck deformity Introduction In 1930, Eiselberg1 reported a case of postoperative of postoperative abnormal alignment from the aspect kyphosis of the spine following laminectomy from the of the presence or absence of buckling-type alignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure Codes
    NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM ORDERED AMBULATORY PROCEDURE CODES Ordered Ambulatory Procedure Codes Table of Contents GENERAL INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 LABORATORY SERVICES INFORMATION-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 RADIOLOGY INFORMATION------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 MMIS MODIFIERS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 RADIOLOGY SERVICES------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY (DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING) ------------------------------------------------------------------------7 DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND SERVICES- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20 RADIOLOGIC GUIDANCE....................................................................................................................................25 BREAST, MAMMOGRAPHY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 BONE/JOINT STUDIES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 RADIATION ONCOLOGY SERVICES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 27 NUCLEAR
    [Show full text]
  • Download Program
    38th Annual San Diego Course June 4 – 5, 2021 Interactive Virtual Shoulder Course Arthroscopy Arthroplasty Fractures Program Chairmen: James C. Esch, M.D., SDSI President and C.E.O. Patrick J. Denard, M.D., Program Chair Final Program Tornier. A trusted name. A relentless focus. Innovation Now driven by Stryker. We’re doubling down on shoulder arthroplasty and to a T. renewing our promise to you and the patients you serve. Stryker. The leader, committed to making healthcare better. Tornier. The shoulder solutions, driving industry-leading innovation. You. The surgeon, delivering better outcomes for your patients. Coming together is what sets us apart. The innovation continues Summer 2021. TM and ® denote Trademarks and Registered Trademarks of Stryker Corporation or its affiliates. ©2021 Stryker Corporation or its affiliates. AP-015176A 06-MAY-2021 Instability excellence Redefining peak performance Elevate your expertise for shoulder instability repairs. With solutions ranging from simple to complex, Smith+Nephew’s Instability Excellence portfolio is setting new standards to take you to the next level while returning your patients to peak performance. Learn more at smith-nephew.com. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 150 Minuteman Road, Andover, MA 01810, www.smith-nephew.com, T +978 749 1000, US Customer Service: +1 800 343 5717 ◊Trademark of Smith+Nephew. All trademarks acknowledged. ©2021 Smith+Nephew. All rights reserved. Printed in USA. 30280 V1 04/21 Advanced healing solutions Redefining healing potential for rotator cuff repair REGENESORB◊ Material Replaced by bone within 24 months.*1,2 at 6 months at at 18 months at Comparisons of absorption, measured via μCT, at 6 and 18 months.3 Suture Anchor Learn more at smith-nephew.com.
    [Show full text]
  • The Benefit of Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Total Knee Arthroplasty
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Arthroscopy for symptomatic total knee arthroplasty THE BENEFIT OF ARTHROSCOPY FOR SYMPTOMATIC TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY Hsiu-Peng Teng, Yi-Jiun Chou, Li-Chun Lin, and Chi-Yin Wong Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Thirty-one knees with symptomatic total knee arthroplasty were diagnosed and treated arthroscopically. There were 18 knees with soft tissue impingement and 13 knees without. There were 16 knees with painful arthroplasty and range of motion (ROM) greater than 90°. Hypertrophied synovitis with or without impingement was more easily found by arthroscopy in this group than in the other 15 knees with the chief complaint of limited ROM, where more remarkable fibrotic tissue with intra-articular adhesion was found. Overall, the average improvement in ROM was 43.1° immediately after arthroscopy, and 20° at the final follow-up. Symptoms improved in 90.3% of patients, and 58.1% were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery. Arthroscopy is helpful for intra-articular diagnosis, obtaining a specimen for histopatho- logic analysis, culture for subclinical infection, and better improvement in ROM. In our experience, arthros- copy for symptomatic knee arthroplasty is reliable, safe and effective. Key Words: arthroscopy, total knee arthroplasty (Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2004;20:473–7) Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a popular and successful detailed history review, physical examination, and radio- treatment for knee-joint problems. However, a subset of graphic studies (anteroposterior, lateral and Merchant patients will suffer from persistent pain, with or without in- views) to detect possible pathologic conditions (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebral Augmentation ICD 9 Codes: Osteoporosis 733. 0, Vertebra
    BRIGHAM AND WOMEN’S HOSPITAL Department of Rehabilitation Services Physical Therapy Standard of Care: Vertebral Augmentation ICD 9 Codes: Osteoporosis 733. 0, Vertebral Fracture closed 805.8, Pathological fracture of Vertebrae 733.13 Vertebral augmentation, known as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, is a minimally invasive procedure that is used to treat vertebral fractures. Vertebral fractures are the most common skeletal injury associated with osteoporosis, and it is estimated that more than 750,000 occur annually in the United States.1 Up to one quarter of people over 50 years of age will have at least one vertebral fracture in their life time secondary to osteoporosis.2 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the operational definition of osteoporosis is a bone density measure >2.5 standard deviations (SD) below the mean of young healthy adults of similar race and gender.3 Primary osteoporosis is related to the changes in postmenopausal women secondary to reduction of estrogen levels and related to age-related loss of bone mass. Secondary osteoporosis is the loss of bone caused by an agent or disease process. 1,4 (See Osteoporosis SOC) The severity of vertebral fractures can be assessed by the Genat semiquantitative method. Commonly used by radiologists, this scale assesses the severity of the fracture visually and has been shown to be reliable.5 Genat Semiquantitive Grading System for Vertebral Deformity5 Grade 0- normal vertebral height Grade 1- minimal fracture- 20-25% height decrease Grade 2- moderate fracture- 25-40% height decrease Grade 3-severe- >40% height decrease Standard methods of diagnosing vertebral fractures are imaging, including the following: CT scan, MRI, and radiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Procedure Name: Knee Arthroscopy Brief Description of Procedure
    Procedure Name: Knee Arthroscopy Brief Description of Procedure: Arthroscopic surgery is a common orthopedic procedure that is used to diagnose and treat problems in joints. Greek words: ‘arthro,’ meaning “joint” and ‘scope,’ meaning, “look.” When arthroscopy is per- formed, a telescope with a camera is inserted into the joint through a small incision. The camera is attached to a light source and shows a picture of the inside of the joint on a monitor. One or more incisions may be made to treat the underlying problem. This procedure can be used to diagnose a joint problem, perform surgery that repairs a joint problem, remove a loose or foreign body, or monitor a dis- ease or the effectiveness of a treatment. Arthroscopy is commonly performed on the knee, shoulder, and ankle. It also can be done on the hip, elbow, and wrist. Describe anesthesia type that typically is given: General Anesthesia is usually used for this surgery. See Anesthesia Section. What patients that smoke can expect when having surgery: After surgery your anesthesia specialist will check your breathing and lung sounds to determine if a breathing treatment is needed. Smoking increases airway irritation, which leads to wheezing and coughing. Further breathing treatments and medications are sometimes needed. Average length of surgery time: 45 minutes-1 hour Average length in immediate recovery: 30 minutes Average length for time of discharge: Expect to be here an average of one hour after surgery. During this time you may experience some discomfort. Medication can be given to make pain bearable. When can you go back to work: Depending on your occupation you and your doctor will discuss when you may return to work.
    [Show full text]
  • Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions
    Musculoskeletal Program CPT Codes and Descriptions Spine Surgery Procedure Codes CPT CODES DESCRIPTION Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition 20930 to code for primary procedure) 20931 Allograft, structural, for spine surgery only (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); local (eg, ribs, spinous process, or laminar 20936 fragments) obtained from same incision (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); morselized (through separate skin or fascial 20937 incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) Autograft for spine surgery only (includes harvesting the graft); structural, bicortical or tricortical (through separate 20938 skin or fascial incision) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) 20974 Electrical stimulation to aid bone healing; noninvasive (nonoperative) Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22206 body subtraction); thoracic Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22207 body subtraction); lumbar Osteotomy of spine, posterior or posterolateral approach, 3 columns, 1 vertebral segment (eg, pedicle/vertebral 22208 body subtraction); each additional vertebral segment (List separately in addition to code for
    [Show full text]
  • Differences Between Subtotal Corpectomy and Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Spinal Cord (2010) 48, 214–220 & 2010 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/10 $32.00 www.nature.com/sc ORIGINAL ARTICLE Differences between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy S Shibuya1, S Komatsubara1, S Oka2, Y Kanda1, N Arima1 and T Yamamoto1 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan and 2Oka Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Clinic, Kagawa, Japan Objective: This study aimed to obtain guidelines for choosing between subtotal corpectomy (SC) and laminoplasty (LP) by analysing the surgical outcomes, radiological changes and problems associated with each surgical modality. Study Design: A retrospective analysis of two interventional case series. Setting: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kagawa University, Japan. Methods: Subjects comprised 34 patients who underwent SC and 49 patients who underwent LP. SC was performed by high-speed drilling to remove vertebral bodies. Autologous strut bone grafting was used. LP was performed as an expansive open-door LP. The level of decompression was from C3 to C7. Clinical evaluations included recovery rate (RR), frequency of C5 root palsy after surgery, re-operation and axial pain. Radiographic assessments included sagittal cervical alignment and bone union. Results: Comparisons between the two groups showed no significant differences in age at surgery, preoperative factors, RR and frequency of C5 palsy. Progression of kyphotic changes, operation time and volumes of blood loss and blood transfusion were significantly greater in the SC (two- or three- level) group. Six patients in the SC group required additional surgery because of pseudoarthrosis, and four patients underwent re-operation because of adjacent level disc degeneration.
    [Show full text]