Name: Terence J Land Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:4 Section Two(B)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Name: Terence J Land Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:4 Section two(b) - Site proposal: Area between Horton Brook and Poyle Quarry Section two (b): Site Proposal: Area between Horton Brook and Poyle Quarry Q17 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Support Q18 [If you support this proposal, please explain your reasons for this] It is immedietly adjacent to existing extractions, provision is planned for temporary traverse of the site and when extraction is complet the area is to be reinstated. Q22 [Are you seeking a change to the policy?] No Name: John Edwards Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:1 I wish to respond to all sections of the consultation Section 1: Q3 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q5:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q6:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Q7 [Please include your comments on how the proposal does not meet the Test of Soundness.] Health and safety wrt environment, particularly wrt young and old. Roads cannot cope with traffic now so additional HGVs is daft. Q8 [Are you seeking a change to the proposal?] Yes Q9 [What change are you seeking?] Locate no where near schools/houses with suitable road access that avoids adding to already huge congestion Section two (a) - Site Proposal: Land West of Basingstoke Road Q10 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q12:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q13:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Section two (b): Site Proposal: Area between Horton Brook and Poyle Quarry Q17 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q19:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q20:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Section three: Proposed Policy DM15: Past Operator Performance Q35 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q37:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q38:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Q40 [Are you seeking a change to the policy?] Yes Q42 [Do you have any further comments?] My first statement covers all clauses. Name: Renton Righelato Role: President Organisation: Berkshire Ornithological Club Responses: Q2:3 Section two(a) - Site proposal: Land west of Basingstoke Road Q2:6 Section four: Further comments Section two (a) - Site Proposal: Land West of Basingstoke Road Q10 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] No view either way Q42 [Do you have any further comments?] These comments refer to restoration following extraction on the land near Spencer's Wood to the west of Basinstoke Road. There is potential for creating a substantial nett gain in biodiversity by restoring all or a large part of the site as wetland nature reserve. (1) The site is close to the epicentre of the nationally significant lower Kennet Nightingale (red list) population, whose preferred habitat is scrub surrounding water bodies on old gravel workings. Creation of suitable habitat would encourage growth of this threatened population. (2) Creation of reed-beds and marshy areas would provide habitat for a wide range of other scarce and charismatic bird species and much other wildlife. The Berkshire Ornithological Club, which holds an extensive database of birds in the county, collaborates with developers and landowners on conservation work of this type. Name: Nicolas Ginder Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:3 Section two(a) - Site proposal: Land west of Basingstoke Road Section two (a) - Site Proposal: Land West of Basingstoke Road Q10 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q12:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q13:1 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The positively prepared test Q13:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Q14 [Please include your comments on how the proposal does not meet the Test of Soundness.] This would damage local environment, pollute air and the river loddon and put more traffic on the already congested basingstoke road. Name: Miao Wang Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:3 Section two(a) - Site proposal: Land west of Basingstoke Road Section two (a) - Site Proposal: Land West of Basingstoke Road Q10 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q12:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q13:1 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The positively prepared test Q13:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Q14 [Please include your comments on how the proposal does not meet the Test of Soundness.] This would damage local environment, pollute air and the river loddon and put more traffic on the already congested basingstoke road. Name: Beth hocking Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:6 Section four: Further comments Q42 [Do you have any further comments?] This proposed site is too close to areas where small children will be occupying most of their days; this can affect people with lung issues and generally is a detriment to health. Should vehicles also deviate from the basingstoke road and use Lambs lane or Back lane this poses a safety issue as the road in its current state is barely large enough for two way traffic which causes congestion issues around school mornings and afternoons. The proposal is ludicrous and should be rejected as a suitable area for A gravel guarry. Name: Helen Coulter Role: Organisation: Responses: Q2:2 Section one - Sand & Gravel Area of Search Q2:3 Section two(a) - Site proposal: Land west of Basingstoke Road Q2:6 Section four: Further comments Section 1: Q3 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q5:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q6:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Q8 [Are you seeking a change to the proposal?] Yes Q9 [What change are you seeking?] Withdrawal of the proposal Section two (a) - Site Proposal: Land West of Basingstoke Road Q10 [Into which of the following categories does your representation fall (Support/No view/Objection)] Objection Q12:2 [An objection must relate either to the Local Plan not complying with legal requirements, or it not being sound in relation of at least one of the Test of Soundness.] Not meeting the Test of Soundness Q13:2 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The justification test Q13:4 [What Test(s) of Soundness do you consider that it fails?] The test of consistency with national policy Q42 [Do you have any further comments?] Helen Coulter Dear Sirs OBJECTION to Proposed Spencers Wood Gravel Quarry I am writing to OBJECT to the proposed Spencers Wood Gravel Quarry. The proposal is in appropriate on multiple grounds. The proposed site is on the edge of two small, quiet rural villages and will impact on all members of the communities and the environment: • Air quality will be compromised – gravel particles will travel and will affect not only the communities in general, but will affect several provisions for young children and also those for the elderly. The gravel dust generated will impact the health of everyone and the environment. • Increased and inappropriate traffic – the proposed access route via the Basingstoke Road is inappropriate and impractical. The road is poor quality, narrow and already is unable to cope with the local traffic. Large lorries will make the situation even worse, add to congestion, pollution and road erosion. This will also be dangerous for pedestrians who use the narrow pavements to walk between Spencers Wood and Swallowfield – the only option for those without transport as the bus services have been greatly reduced. • Flooding – risk of flooding in this area is a real issue. This is a Flood Zone – completely inappropriate for development of any type. • Environment & Ecology – This area is farmland with footpaths. It is also adjacent to a Site of Special Scientific interest – any development of this site will have a real environmental impact.