For Groveland Park, Mercer Island, King County, Washington

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For Groveland Park, Mercer Island, King County, Washington Exhibit F CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR GROVELAND PARK, MERCER ISLAND, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON February 5, 2016 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS SEATTLE, WASHINGTON CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR GROVELAND PARK, MERCER ISLAND, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Report Prepared for Robert W. Droll, Landscape Architect PS 4405 7th Avenue SE Lacey, WA 98503 By Brandy A. Rinck February 5, 2016 Project No. 34197 Report No. 16-55 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION – NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 221 1st Ave W, Suite 205 Seattle, Washington 98119 CULTURAL RESOURCES REPORT COVER SHEET Author: Rinck, Brandy A. Title of Report: Cultural Resources Assessment for Groveland Park, Mercer Island, King County, Washington Date of Report: February 5, 2016 County(ies): King Section: 24 Township: 24 N Range: 4E Quad: Seattle South Acres: 1.4 PDF of report submitted (REQUIRED) Yes Historic Property Export Files submitted? Yes No Archaeological Site(s)/Isolate(s) Found or Amended? Yes No TCP(s) found? Yes No Replace a draft? Yes No Satisfy a DAHP Archaeological Excavation Permit requirement? Yes # No Were Human Remains Found? Yes DAHP Case # No SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT FOR GROVELAND PARK, MERCER ISLAND, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Mercer Island Parks and Recreation proposes a new pier surrounding the existing swimming area at Groveland Park on Mercer Island in King County, Washington (Figure 1). On behalf of Mercer Island, Landscape Architect Robert Droll retained SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to conduct a cultural resources assessment for the project. This cultural resources assessment report details the natural and cultural setting of the project area and presents the methods and results of field survey. No significant cultural materials were identified in the heavily disturbed project area during the assessment. A. PROJECT INFORMATION 1. Proposed project activities and elements: Mercer Island Parks and Recreation proposes to replace two existing piers that currently delineate the Groveland Park swim area with one new fixed pier (Figure 2). An Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lift will be added to the new pier. A floating breakwater will be installed in the water, and the sandy bottom of the swim area will slowly transition to lake bed. The project will affect approximately 360 feet (110 m) of shoreline. Shoreline restoration is proposed for portions of the pocket beach outside the swim area. Upland project elements include adding theater steps to access the beach and turf terrace to the current grassy areas near the existing restroom. The maximum depth of ground disturbance associated with these project elements is currently unknown. A portion of the new pier will overlap the footprint of the southernmost old pier. 2. Regulatory Context: The pier replacement project is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), as amended, because it will require a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The NHPA requires federal agencies to identify and assess the effects of their undertaking on historic properties. Historic properties are those that are listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and may include buildings or other structures, archaeological sites, and traditional cultural properties. To qualify for listing in the NRHP, a district, site, structure, building, or object must generally be 50 years of age, possess integrity of physical characteristics, and meet at least one of four criteria of significance (36 CFR 60.4) at the national, state, or local level. The USACE has its own regulations for meeting its responsibilities under the NHPA (33 CFR 325, Appendix C). Sites that are important enough to protect or to mitigate are termed “designated historic properties” by the USACE. A designated historic property is listed in or is eligible for listing in the NRHP by meeting the same criteria discussed above. A purpose of this report is to advise the USACE of the potential for the project to affect designated historic properties and recommend additional investigation as warranted. In addition, a State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) checklist will be filed for the project, which requires a Shoreline Permit and other permits from the Washington State Department of Ecology. The project may also receive funding from the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office. Other relevant Washington state laws address archaeological sites and Native American burials. The Archaeological Sites and Resources Act [RCW 27.53] prohibits knowingly excavating or SWCA Environmental Consultants 1 February 5, 2016 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 2 Cultural Resources Assessment for Groveland Park disturbing prehistoric and historic archaeological sites on public or private land. The Indian Graves and Records Act [RCW 27.44] prohibits knowingly destroying American Indian graves and provides that inadvertent disturbance through construction or other activities requires re-interment under supervision of the appropriate Indian tribe. This report aids the project in complying with federal and state laws and regulations by identifying historic properties and determining sensitivity for the inadvertent discovery of buried historic properties (archaeological sites), so that appropriate plans can be made to avoid or minimize damage to them. B. NATURAL AND CULTURAL SETTING 1. Geologic Setting The project is within the Puget Lowland, a geographic province that separates the Olympic Mountains from the Western Cascades. The present topography of the Puget Lowland is primarily the result of continental glaciers that extended south from what is now Canada during the Pleistocene (Booth et al. 2004). The most recent ice sheet advance occurred during the Vashon Stade of the Fraser glaciation, which reached Seattle around 17,400 calibrated years before the present (cal BP) (Booth et al. 2004; Dethier et al. 1995; Heusser 1973). The ice sheet extended as far south as Tenino before it retreated from the Puget Lowland by 16,400 cal BP (Troost and Booth 2008). Proglacial lakes formed behind the retreating ice front, connecting glacially carved meltwater channels. Hundreds of meters of unconsolidated till and outwash sediment were exposed on the newly deglaciated upland surfaces around the lakes (Alt and Hyndman 1994; Borden and Troost 2001; Dethier et al. 1995; Galster and Laprade 1991; Liesch et al. 1963; Porter and Swanson 1998; Troost and Stein 1995; Waitt and Thorson 1983; Yount et al. 1993). Lacustrine sediments were deposited in the lake bottoms. The project is on the shoreline of modern Lake Washington, which occupies one of the largest glacially carved troughs in the Puget Lowland. In some places, such as the project area, the ice carved the trough so deeply that old pre-Fraser glacial deposits are exposed in steep bluffs. Small creeks drain the glacial upland, forming small alluvial fans where they meet Lake Washington. A summary of the previous geotechnical borings completed for this project which encountered pre-Fraser glacial outwash, is in Attachment A (Levine and McCaughan 2015). Changing environmental conditions throughout the subsequent Holocene have affected the distribution of resources, suitability of particular landforms for human occupation, and archaeological site visibility and preservation (Dethier et al. 1995; Dragovich et al. 1994; Thorson 1989). For example, the surface elevation of water in what is now Lake Washington fluctuated in tandem with sea level in Puget Sound throughout the early Holocene because Lake Washington was then connected to the marine Duwamish embayment (Dragovich et al. 1994; Easterbrook 1993; Leopold 1982; Mullineaux 1970). Marine water drained from Lake Washington Bay, and the trough began to fill with freshwater by about 14,800 cal BP (Troost 2011). Rebound of the land from the weight of glacial ice was complete by 11,600 cal BP, causing the isolation of the north end of Lake Washington from the Puget Sound (Clague and James 2002; Thorson 1981, 1989). The south end of Lake Washington continued to be influenced by the Puget Sound until the Cedar River delta expanded across its outlet and completely separated Lake Washington from the rest of Puget Sound (Troost 2011). SWCA Environmental Consultants February 5, 2016 CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION NOT FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION Cultural Resources Assessment for Groveland Park 3 Evidence of relatively rapid fresh water inundation of the early and middle Holocene lakeshores is apparent from buried shorelines around Lake Washington (Thorson 1998). Heavy rainfall, drought, and tectonic activity may have also caused major fluctuations in lake levels during the middle to late Holocene (Chrzastowski 1983). Lake Washington shoreline inundation continued at a slower rate after sea level reached equilibrium in Puget Sound about 5,000 years ago. Construction of the Lake Washington Ship Canal in 1916 redirected the lake’s outflow from its south end near Renton to the west through Lake Union. The ship canal opening caused the level of Lake Washington to drop approximately 2.7 m (9 feet). The drop in lake level exposed several Native American camp sites and features along the lake’s shoreline, as well as most of the project area (Carter 1917; Thrush 2007). The drop in shoreline elevation also exacerbated erosion along the lakeshore. Adding to the complexity of the Lake Washington shoreline history is activity
Recommended publications
  • 173D Photo of the Month ~
    `- March-April 2020, Issue 91 See all issues to date at the 503rd Heritage Battalion website: Contact: [email protected] http://corregidor.org/VN2-503/newsletter/issue_index.htm ~ ~ 173d Photo of the Month “Elements of the 173d Airborne Brigade Arrive in Saigon From Okinawa, 1965” (Caption & photo source: DoD Vietnam Studies, 1989) 2/503d VIETNAM Newsletter / March-April 2020 – Issue 91 Page 1 of 68 We Dedicate this Issue of Our Newsletter in Memory and Honor of the Young Men of the 173d Airborne Brigade & Attached Units We Lost 50 Years Ago In the Months of March and April 1970 “You have done your duty, to honour you is ours.” Deandrea Hamilton Paul Vernon Adams, 20 Ralph North Bright, 22 SGT, D/1/503, 3/7/70 CPL, B/2/503, 4/21/70 (Incident date 3/3/70) 2/4/11: “We Remember. Ralph is 10/6/03: “You will always be buried at Peoria Cemetery, Orange Park, remembered. Dear Paul, I wanted to take Clay County, FL. BSM ARCOM PH.” the opportunity to just thank you for Robert Sage everything you did for our country and the people during the war. Your dedication to this country is evident and Gerald Winston Byrns, Jr., 24 you are greatly respected. I don’t know much about SSG, D/4/503, 4/27/70 you, but you’re a hero to our generation and 2/4/11: “We Remember. Ralph is generations to come. Thank you and may you rest in buried at Peoria Cemetery, Orange Park, peace. Sincerely, Ashley.” Ashley Kiefer Clay County, FL.
    [Show full text]
  • Bagley, Daniel (1818-1905) and Clarence B. Bagley (1843-1932)
    minister in 1842, he traveled the state of Illinois as a circuit preacher. It takes more than a good resume to get a In 1852, the family, including their only government contract. child, Clarence, joined others as part of the burgeoning Westward movement. Their wagon train was called "The Bethel Party," and included several individuals, such as Bagley, Daniel Dexter Horton (1825-1904) and Thomas Mercer, who would also have a profound (1818-1905) and influence on the growth of Seattle. Cholera, not Indians was the main enemy Clarence B. Bagley along the trail. Turning south to the verdant Willamette Valley, the Bagley family settled (1843-1932) near Salem, Oregon. The eager Methodist missionary, with a five-year engagement From: HistoryLink.org Essay 3470 : from the Methodist Protestant Church at $600 a year, established several churches Daniel Bagley was a Methodist preacher over an eight-year period. who traveled west in covered wagons with However, Susannah Bagley's health was his family in 1852 as part of the Bethel poor, and the couple and their son traveled Party. He and his wife Susannah Whipple north by horse-drawn buggy -- the first such Bagley (1819-1913) and son Clarence contraption to enter Seattle-- looking for the Bagley arrived in Seattle in October 1860. clean air of Puget Sound. His Willamette Daniel Bagley established the Brown Valley work had apparently been Church in Seattle in 1860 and besides recognized, for he was appointed a preaching became a key advocate for the "traveling agent" of the American Tract Territorial University and its location in Society, with duties in Puget Sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2016 VOLUME 23 NUMBER 3
    1644 43rd Avenue East, Seattle, WA 98112-3222 (206) 328-2716 https://fiskelibrary.org Fiske Genealogical Foundation INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Spring 2016 VOLUME 23 NUMBER 3 Research AROLYN LOUNT S Finding Unpublished 9-10 C B ’ Surnames FAMILY RECORD Barry J. Ewell, Genealogy 4 Blogger Curtis, Jared (2015). Carolyn Blount’s Family Record. The Mirabella Monthly”, August 2015, Vol. 7, Issue 8. Reprinted with permission. Using One Step Web 6 & 10 Pages Shake any family tree and a wide range of characters Articles will fall out, from heroes to scalawags, from Carolyn Blount’s Family 1-3 adventurers to stay-at-homes. It isn’t something many Record would do; not everyone has the interest, skill, or Karen Sipe, Newest Board 6 perseverance of Carolyn Blount, who has just published Member at the Fiske Classes Edward “Neddie” Browning Ward (Outskirts Press, 2015) after more than thirty years of research. As she relates in her introduction to this 708-page Spring Classes 4-5 book, she remembers with fondness and pride the stories told by her mother Books and grandmother of her early Seattle pioneer family that journeyed from the east coast to the Pacific Northwest in the mid-nineteenth century. Her great Spring Acquisitions 7-9 grandfather and great grandmother traveled by separate wagon trains, she Community Events directly over the Cascades to Grand Mound Prairie near Olympia and he to Conference on Jewish 9 an area in Salem. They met, married, and came to Seattle to join Judge Genealogy Thomas Mercer and the Denny party, the founders of the community on Fiske—General Puget Sound that came to be known as Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological History Oe Seattle from 1850 to 1897
    A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OE SEATTLE FROM 1850 TO 1897 PREPARED IN 1900 AND 1901 BT THOMAS W. PROSCH * * * tlBLS OF COIfJI'tS mm FAOE M*E PASS Prior to 1350 1 1875 225 1850 17 1874 251 1351 22 1875 254 1852 27 1S76 259 1855 58 1877 245 1854 47 1878 251 1SSS 65 1879 256 1356 77 1830 262 1357 87 1831 270 1358 95 1882 278 1859 105 1383 295 1360 112 1884 508 1861 121 1385 520 1862 i52 1886 5S5 1865 153 1887 542 1364 147 1888 551 1365 153 1883 562 1366 168 1390 577 1867 178 1391 595 1368 186 1892 407 1369 192 1805 424 1370 193 1894 441 1871 207 1895 457 1872 214 1896 474 Apostolus Valerianus, a Greek navigator in tho service of the Viceroy of Mexico, is supposed in 1592, to have discov­ ered and sailed through the Strait of Fuca, Gulf of Georgia, and into the Pacific Ocean north of Vancouver1 s Island. He was known by the name of Juan de Fuca, and the name was subsequently given to a portion of the waters he discovered. As far as known he made no official report of his discoveries, but he told navi­ gators, and from these men has descended to us the knowledge thereof. Richard Hakluyt, in 1600, gave some account of Fuca and his voyages and discoveries. Michael Locke, in 1625, pub­ lished the following statement in England. "I met in Venice in 1596 an old Greek mariner called Juan de Fuca, but whose real name was Apostolus Valerianus, who detailed that in 1592 he sailed in a small caravel from Mexico in the service of Spain along the coast of Mexico and California, until he came to the latitude of 47 degrees, and there finding the land trended north and northeast, and also east and south east, with a broad inlet of seas between 47 and 48 degrees of latitude, he entered therein, sailing more than twenty days, and at the entrance of said strait there is on the northwest coast thereto a great headland or island, with an exceeding high pinacle or spiral rock, like a pillar thereon." Fuca also reported find­ ing various inlets and divers islands; describes the natives as dressed in skins, and as being so hostile that he was glad to get away.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Civil War Civilized Seattle
    How the Civil War Civilized Seattle The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37736798 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA How the Civil War Civilized Seattle Paul B. Hagen A Thesis in the Field of History for a Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University November 2017 Copyright 2017 Paul B. Hagen Abstract Founded in 1851, Seattle was little more than a rough-and-tumble frontier town at the onset of the Civil War. However, by 1880 the young community had developed into a small, but prosperous city. Not only did the population grow immensely during this time, but the character of the town also changed. By 1880 Seattle was no longer just another western logging town, but rather a civilized metropolitan center. Although the rapid development of Seattle is widely accepted, the connection between it and the Civil War has not been reported. Historical data suggest that the Civil War did influence the development of Seattle. The Civil War caused Seattle’s population to grow through recruitment of unemployed war widows and orphans. These recruits brought New England culture to Seattle, which served as a civilizing force. The Civil War also led to policies that helped Seattle develop in other ways.
    [Show full text]
  • LAKE UNION Historical WALKING TOUR
    B HistoryLink.org Lake Union Walking Tour | Page 1 b Introduction: Lake Union the level of Lake Union. Two years later the waters of Salmon Bay were raised behind the his is a Cybertour of Seattle’s historic Chittenden Locks to the level of Lake Union. South Lake Union neighborhood, includ- Historical T As the Lake Washington Ship Canal’s ing the Cascade neighborhood and portions Walking tour Government Locks (now Hiram of the Denny Regrade. It was written Chittenden Locks) neared its 1917 and curated by Paula Becker with completion, the shores of Lake Union the assistance of Walt Crowley and sprouted dozens of boat yards. For Paul Dorpat. Map by Marie McCaffrey. most of the remaining years of the Preparation of this feature was under- twentieth century, Lake Union was written by Vulcan Inc., a Paul G. Allen one of the top wooden-boat building Company. This Cybertour begins at centers in the world, utilizing rot- Lake Union Park, then loosely follows resistant local Douglas fir for framing the course of the Westlake Streetcar, and Western Red Cedar for planking. with forays into the Cascade neighbor- During and after World War I, a hood and into the Seattle Center area. fleet of wooden vessels built locally for the war but never used was moored Seattle’s in the center of Lake Union. Before “Little Lake” completion of the George Washington ake Union is located just north of the Washington, Salmon Bay, and Puget Sound. Memorial Bridge (called Aurora Bridge) in L geographic center and downtown core A little more than six decades later, Mercer’s 1932, a number of tall-masted ships moored of the city of Seattle.
    [Show full text]
  • Queen Anne Historic Context Statement
    QUEEN ANNE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT Prepared by Florence K. Lentz and Mimi Sheridan For the Seattle Department of Neighborhoods, Historic Preservation Program and the Queen Anne Historical Society October 2005 The community of Queen Anne is one of Seattle’s oldest residential neighborhoods. Pioneer settler Thomas Mercer first called the forested, water-lapped district Eden Hill. By the mid-1880s, the growing suburb had acquired the name Queen Anne Town in reference to its showy domestic architecture. The character of this thoroughly urban neighborhood today is the result of several key influences, both physical and human. Natural features have both encouraged and restrained the development of Queen Anne over time. Waterways at the base of the hill virtually assured adjacent industrial growth from an early date. At the same time, steep topography limited the spread of large-scale commercial and industrial land uses on the hill itself. Instead, the hill became attractive as an early residential suburb because of its spectacular territorial and water views and its relative accessibility to the city. Queen Anne Hill was linked to Seattle by public transit in the late 1880s. Thereafter, streetcar lines fostered rapid platting, intensive residential construction, and the eventual emergence of multifamily housing – all within a brief forty-year period of time. The close-in location and unsurpassed views continue to stabilize the high value of real estate on the hill. Queen Anne’s character has been shaped as much by its human resources as by its physical features. The fact that progressive, well-educated families made the hill their home from the outset has left a lasting legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodist Pioneers, Founding Fathers of Seattle by Everett W
    Methodist Pioneers, Founding Fathers of Seattle by Everett W. Palmer Presiding Bishop of the Seattle Area, The Methodist Church. ERHAPS no major city in the United States owes quite as Pmuch to Methodist pioneers as Seattle, Washington. Most of its founders were Methodists, as were those who played a dominant role in the early and decisive years of its development. Most, if not all, of the first settlers were Methodists. The &st church established was a Methodist Church. The first school was conducted by the wife of a Methodist minister in the Methodist parsonage. The first uni- versity, now the University of Washington, was founded through the initiative of a Methodist minister supported by a loyal Method- ist laity. And this is but a sample. Let us reverse the calendar a century. It is September 25,1851. A party of three men paddle up to the shore of what is now West Seattle. It is the end of a long journey. Since early April they have traveled, first by wagon train from their homes in Illinois to the Willamette Valley, and from there by foot and Indian canoe to the "Puget Sound country." They have been sent ahead by other mem- bers of their party to explore this region and determine its promise. The oldest of the group is John Low, 31. The other two are David Denny, 19, and Lee Terry, also a teen-ager. A tribe of Indians nearby is busily engaged, fishing for salmon. Their chief, a noble man of regal bearing, strides down the beach to bid them welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insane in Washington Territory
    SEATTLE PUBLIC LIBRARY THE INSANE IN WASHINGTON TERRITORY £€/ THOMAS W. PROSCH Seattle, Wash. NORTHWEST MEDICINE April, 1914. r- cJ F THE INSANE IN WASHINGTON TERRITORY.* By MB. THOMAS W. PBOSCH, ^SEATTLE, WASH. Insanity in thQ°§|aW!,\)f, Wa^hfegtono^ales^bacte" to the coming of the first wiiite men, more 'fna'ii & century ago. In the first yea£\§Jefi t]fe 'l$§t."century, an American fur trader, ti&med'' Henry,0 was operat­ ing in the region of the Rocky Mountains. In 1808 one of his houses was attacked by Indians who killed all the men connected therewith but one. This one escaped unperceived. In a destitute condition he wandered about for several weeks, suffering greatly. The massacre of his companions, added to his later troubles, affected his mind, the disorder, however, being of harmless character. While in this condi­ tion he fell in with other Indians, in the Snake River country, who took him into their care. All over the continent the Indians regarded de­ ranged persons with superstitious awe and would help and not harm them. Fennimore Cooper and other writers made record of this fact on the At­ lantic seaboard long ago. So it was with these In­ dians and this unfortunate young man. They seemed to think that he was nearer to God than they; that God had specially visited him, and that they must be gentle and good to him. For three years they housed, fed and clothed him, giving him treatment as good as that they themselves enjoyed. In 1810 John Jacob Astor, of New York, as the head of the Pacific Fur Company, sent in two parts an expedition to the Columbia River.
    [Show full text]
  • Making History Together
    making history together Seattle heritage and cultural organizations providing year-round learning and inspiration at the water’s edge. P. 2 making history together Our beautiful city is fortunate to be defined by many diverse bodies of water. From Puget Sound to Lake Union through the Ship Canal to Lake Washington, from the Duwamish River to our four urban creek systems, these bodies of water in many ways define who we are as a city. They frame our sensibilities and priorities by providing habitat for mammals, fish, birds and insects. For people, they enable us to enjoy boating, fishing, kayaking, swimming, and endless beach activities. The development of Lake Union Park realizes a longtime city vision to revisit and present the rich history of the site and its relationship to the water. The Olmsted Brothers, who designed the nucleus of our park system, envisioned a grand urban park at this site. Through our partnerships with Seattle Parks Foundation, The Center for Wooden Boats, the United Indians of All Tribes, Northwest Seaport, South Lake Union Friends and Neighbors (SLUFAN), the Museum of History & Industry, and others, we are able to turn vision into reality. When newcomers first settled at the site, it was the home of the Duwamish people. Imagine their walking paths meandering through the timber, connecting the lake village with Native settlements to the east and west. Soon historic panels at the park will tell the whole history, from the arrival of the settlers through the building of the streetcar to the opening of the Ship Canal to the construction of The Boeing Airplane Company.
    [Show full text]
  • King County-Owned Historic Properties Survey Report
    Survey Report Survey of County-Owned Historic Properties in King County, Washington Certified Local Government Grant No. FY10-61020-001 Principal Investigators: Charlie Sundberg King County Historic Preservation Program King County Department of Natural Resoruces and Parks 201 South Jackson Street, Suite 700 Seattle, WA 98104 Submitted to: Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation 1063 S. Capitol Way, Suite 106 Olympia, WA 98501 August, 2011 This project was financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior administered by the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) and the King County Historic Preservation Program. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or DAHP. Regulations of the U.S. Department of Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally Assisted Programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. ii 2010 King County-Owned Historic Properties Survey & Inventory King County, WA Executive Summary This report presents the findings of an intensive-level survey of historic County-owned properties in King County, Washington. The project took place between October of 2009 and August of 2011. Its purpose is to provide information required for the ongoing management of County-owned historic resources.
    [Show full text]
  • The Denny Cabin
    The David T. Denny Cabin By Dick Caster The David T. Denny Cabin May 1889 Prepared for the Historical Society of Federal Way David T. Denny circa 1880 July 27, 2011 The David T. Denny Cabin before restoration Copyright © 2011 by the Historical Society of Federal Way. Denny Cabin July 27, 2011 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 David Denny Source Material...................................................................................... 4 Denny Cabin Source Material ..................................................................................... 6 David Denny Background Before Arriving in Portland, Oregon Territory ........... 6 Portland, Oregon Territory ......................................................................................... 7 Coming to Puget Sound ................................................................................................ 8 Exploring the Alki Area ............................................................................................... 9 Alki Point ..................................................................................................................... 10 Arthur Denny and Family, Borens, Lows and Bells come to Alki ......................... 13 Move to Seattle ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]