DOCSLIB.ORG

White Unwed Mother: the Adoption Mandate in Postwar Canada Valerie Andrews a THESIS SUBMITTED to the FACULTY of GRADUATE STUDIES

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White Unwed Mother: the Adoption Mandate in Postwar Canada Valerie Andrews a THESIS SUBMITTED to the FACULTY of GRADUATE STUDIES White Unwed Mother: The Adoption Mandate in Postwar Canada Valerie Andrews A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS GRADUATE PROGRAM IN GENDER, FEMINIST AND WOMEN’S STUDIES (GFWS) TORONTO, ONTARIO March, 2017 © Valerie Andrews, 2017 ii ABSTRACT The white adoption mandate was a process of interrelated institutional power systems, which together with socio-cultural norms, ideals of gender heteronormativity, and emerging sociological and psychoanalytic theories, created historically unique conditions in the post WWII decades wherein white unmarried mothers were systematically and often violently separated from their babies by means of adoption in the hundreds of thousands in Canada. These factors, together with urbanization, eugenics, the profession of social work, and the introduction of baby formula; all within the context of two World Wars, collided as a kind of perfect storm to create an unprecedented locus in history where approximately 300,000 unmarried mothers in Canada were systematically separated from their babies at birth for adoption in an attempt to rehabilitate them for normative womanhood. iii DEDICATION For my son, Christopher (1970-2008) “Take me outside I want to feel the rain on my face,” he said, so we went outside and sat together holding hands and felt the light, warm Vancouver rain fall on our faces. We talked not about our lost past, but our lost future… I remember those days my Beloved When we danced in the teardrops of the Goddess And the only Angels I have ever seen Slid down your cheeks from the windows of your soul And the rain, the gentle rain so sweet from Heaven Fell down over the temples of our souls And we tasted the salt of Her ocean Her rain washed away our pain Pete Bernard iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………….………...ii Dedication………………………………………………………………………………………...iii Table of Contents……………………………………………………………………………..…..iv List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………………...v List of Illustrations……….……………………………..…………………………………..…….vi List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………………….vii Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Chapter One The Construction of the Characterization and Incarceration of the Fallen………………………16 Section I – Forbidding Options-The Unmarried Mother in Nineteenth Century Canada..19 Section II –The Magdalen, Rescue, Salvationist and Maternity Home Movement……...28 Chapter Two Characterizations of the Unmarried Mother in the 20th Century…………………..….………....48 Chapter Three Social Work and Sociological Theories………………………..………………………….…….79 Section I – The Profession of Social Work……………………………………………..81 Section II – The Impact of Sociological Theories on the Adoption Mandate…………...95 Chapter Four Maternity Homes in Canada……………………………………………….….………..…..…. 115 Chapter Five The Postwar Mother Imperative…………………………………………………………..…....158 Section I – Postwar Mother Imperative – A Maternalistic Ideology for Whites Only Please......................................................................................................................159 Section II – Race and Gender and the Adoption Mandate……………………………..163 Section III – The Phenomenon of Mass Surrender……………………………………..173 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………...192 References……………………………………………………………………………………...202 Appendices Appendix A – Rules & Regulations for the Industrial House of Refuge Toronto (Magdalen Laundry)…………………………………………………………………....251 Appendix B – Social Diagnosis, Mary Richmond, The Unmarried Mother, 1917….....253 Appendix C – Correspondence from Betty Graham to Victoria Leach………………..261 Appendix D – Maternity Homes in Canada- List and Images…………………………263 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Daily Schedule of Maternity Home circa 1960s…………………………134 Table 2: Number of Adoptions from Unmarried Mothers, 1942-1971 Province of Ontario……………………………………………………………….. 179 vi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Illustration Page 1. Correspondence, Sandfield MacDonald Collection 1812-1872………………………….16 2. Found Drowned. Oil on Canvas. Watts, George Frederick (1867)………………………18 3. In the Laundry’s Steam Mangle. Photograph. Ritchie, T. (2013)………………………..28 4. Feeble Minded Woman: Inmate of a Maternity Hospital. Report Upon the Care of the Feeble- Minded in Ontario, 1908……………………………………………………50 5. Unwed Mothers, Henry Gallus, 1962, Book Cover………………………………….…..67 6. With Case Worker. Photograph. Clark, E. (1951). Life Magazine………………………81 7. Humewood House, Residents Doing Laundry, Toronto, circa 1950s. ACCA…….……118 8. Armagh Maternity Home, Series of Photographs of Maternity Home Residents, PA….136 9. Babies fill a nursery at Humewood House in an archival photo from the shelter's collection. Toronto Star…………………………………………………………………….144 10. Faith Haven Outgrows Itself. Windsor, Ontario, Salvation Army. War Cry…………..147 11. Salvation Army Officers Care Lovingly for the Infants of Unmarried Mothers, SAA..159 12. An ever increasing ‘crop’ of babies born to unwed mothers in Winnipeg is…………..186 creating a backlog of babies who have nowhere to go. Winnipeg Free Press vii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACCA Anglican Church of Canada Archives ARCAT Archives of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Toronto ARENA Adoption Resource Exchange of North America ASCA Australian Senate Committee Report CAS Children’s Aid Society CCAS Catholic Children’s Aid Society CTA City of Toronto Archives HSP Historical Society of Philadelphia LAC Library and Archives Canada OCAS Ontario Children’s Aid Society Association PANB Provincial Archives of New Brunswick PA Presbyterian Church in Canada Archives SAA Salvation Army Archives SGS Sisters of the Good Shepherd SNOOLC A Short Notice on the Origin and Objective of the Sisters of the Lady of Charity Better Known as the Sisters of the Good Shepherd UCMF United Church Maternity Facilities UCCA United Church of Canada Archives WHO World Health Organization YWCA Young Women’s Christian Association 1 White Unwed Mother: The Adoption Mandate in Postwar Canada Introduction Adoption practice works on the premise that in order to ‘save’ the child - you must first destroy its mother (Wellfare, 1997). While feminist research seeks to foreground subjugated knowledge and support social justice on issues that resound in the lives of women, only recently have contemporary feminists attempted to locate adoption within feminism. Dominant ideology in mainstream Canadian society and feminist scholarship typically ascribe agency to white unmarried mothers who surrendered babies for adoption post WWII and, as I will argue, obscure the existence of an adoption mandate (Shawyer, 1979; Solinger 1992; Kunzel, 1993; Fessler, 2006; Chambers 2007; Pietsch, 2012) and the subsequent phenomenon of mass infant adoption.1 The postwar white adoption mandate might be described as a process of interrelated institutional power systems, which together with socio-cultural norms, ideals of gender heteronormativity, and emerging sociological and psychoanalytic theories, created historically unique conditions in the post WWII decades wherein white unmarried mothers were systematically and often violently separated from their babies by means of adoption in the hundreds of thousands in Australia, New Zealand, the UK, Canada and the United States. In Canada alone, approximately 300,000 unmarried mothers were impacted by the mandate from 1 The term “birthmother” will not be used in this work, except as a search tool or as revealed through research since many mothers of adoption loss reject adoption industry terminology as marginalizing, demeaning, and dismissive of their lived experience as mothers. Other terms such as “fallen woman”, “unmarried mother”, “unwed mother”, ”bastard”, “illegitimate”, “negro”, “baby-farmer”, may be used in historical context or as quoted from primary sources. The term “home” as a reference to maternity facilities is used to reflect the historical name used during the period. It is acknowledged that many mothers of the mandate reject the term “home” for the quasi-incarceral institutions where unmarried mothers resided. 2 1940 to 19702. The mandate was also influenced by urbanization, eugenics, social work, medical advances, and the introduction of baby formula; all within the context of two World Wars. These these factors came together as a kind of “perfect storm” to create an unprecedented locus in history wherein the majority of white unmarried mothers in Canada were routinely and systematically separated from their babies at birth for adoption. Was there an adoption mandate for white unmarried mothers in postwar Canada which resulted in the phenomenon of mass infant adoption? This research aims to provide evidence of the mandate in Canada, to demonstrate that mass infant adoption occurred as a result, and to explore the ways in which adoption can operate or effectively function as a form of violence against women and the maternal body (Shawyer, 1979; Davis, 1998; Roberts, 2002). This work is original in scope. Without this research, the adoption mandate in Canada and related phenomenon of mass surrender remain hidden, a secreted knowledge that continues to subjugate the women impacted, insofar as they are too frequently portrayed as agents who actively relinquished, rather than surrendered their children to adoption. This research examines the history and challenges the ways in which unmarried mothers have been constructed within adoption as pathological subjects. The postwar institution of adoption, its policies and practices which led to the production
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: Policy and Practice Barriers to Adoption
    4 Policy and practice barriers to adoption 4.1 This chapter reviews the evidence on policy and practice barriers to adoption. 4.2 It considers how past forced adoption policies and practices, as well as complex and time consuming administrative processes, create barriers to a forward looking approach to adoption. The legacy of past forced adoption policies and practices 4.3 Past forced adoption policies and practices were unethical, immoral and often illegal. They resulted in a high prevalence of forced adoptions from the 1950s to the 1980s.1 4.4 The Australian Government has issued apologies to those affected by past practices of forced removals and forced adoptions, including the 2008 National Apology to Australia’s Indigenous Peoples, the 2009 National Apology to the Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants, and the 2013 National Apology for Forced Adoptions.2 4.5 In addition, states and territories, with the exception of the Northern Territory, have also apologised for past forced adoption policies and practices.3 All have undertaken not to repeat them.4 1 Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS), ‘Forced Adoption National Practice Principles’, 2016, pp. 3, 6, <https://aifs.gov.au/sites/default/files/fass-practice-principles.pdf> viewed 3 October 2018. 2 Australian Human Rights Commission, Submission 103, p. 16. 3 Name withheld, Submission 57, p. 4; Mrs Jo Fraser, Submission 75, p. [1]; Ms Alison Anderson MLA, Minister for Children and Families, Northern Territory Government ‘Support for adoption apology on behalf of nation’, Media Release, 21 March 2013, 66 4.6 The Australian Institute of Family Studies defines forced adoption as referring: … to mothers who were forced to give up children for adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercountry Adoption in Australia
    Inter country Adoption in Australia By Damon Martin – NSW Service Coordinator – ISS Australia (NSW Office) Australian Federation It is important to begin by explaining the nature of the Australian Federation and how that affects agreements made with overseas countries in relation to adoption. First of all, Australia is a federation consisting of the Federal Government (i.e. the Australian Government which is based in our capital city, Canberra), it also known as the Commonwealth Government. There are also the governments of the six States (New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and Tasmania) and the governments of two territories (Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory). There is legislation at the Federal and State/Territory levels relating to adoption. While the adoption laws in each of the States and Territories are fairly similar, they are not identical. 1. Situation of Intercountry Adoption in Australia Agreements with Overseas Countries In the past intercountry adoption programs were established and managed by the various State or Territory Governments. Usually a state like Victoria or New South Wales would then take the lead on being responsible for the management of that program. Nowadays the Commonwealth Central Authority has now taken on the full responsibility of the management and establishment of Australia’s intercountry adoption programs. Therefore the Federal Government enters an agreement with another overseas Government on behalf of itself and each of the State and Territory Governments within Australia. It is important to note that the Commonwealth Central Authority will always consult with the States and Territories prior to establishing any new agreement with an overseas country.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination Against People with Disabilities Under Adoption Law
    laws Article Some Parents Are More Equal than Others: Discrimination against People with Disabilities under Adoption Law Blake Connell Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3053, Australia; [email protected] or [email protected] Received: 31 May 2017; Accepted: 9 August 2017; Published: 23 August 2017 Abstract: Article 23 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) explicitly includes ‘the adoption of children’ as a right to which people with disabilities are equally entitled. Despite the CRPD having been in force for over nine years, research is yet to consider whether CRPD signatory states have brought their respective adoption regimes in line with their obligations under art 23 of the CRPD. Using the laws of the Australian state of Victoria by way of case study, this article aims to shed light on the difficulties people with disabilities still face when attempting to adopt children. In terms of methodology, this article conducts an interpretive critique of Victoria’s adoption law against art 23 of the CRPD, which it interprets mainly through the lens of the social model of disability. Ultimately, this article finds that Victoria’s adoption framework closely resembles the adoption regimes of many other CRPD signatories, yet it clearly fails to uphold Australia’s obligations under the CRPD. This is both as a result of the words of the legislation as well as their implementation in practice. This article proposes a suite of changes, both legislative and cultural, to bring Victoria’s adoption framework in line with art 23, which it hopes will serve as a catalyst for change in other CRPD signatory states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Re-Marketing of the Business of Adoption
    2012 Claudia Corrigan D'Arcy http://www.MusingsoftheLame.com [RE-MARKETING ADOPTION] On a foundation of good intentions and corruption, domestic infant adoption has rebranded itself thorough strategic public relations moves, market research and a well funded legislative lobby. While the public thinks sweet thoughts about adopting all those "unwanted children", the adoption industry creates a product and cashes in on a billion dollar business. 2 Re-Marketing Adoption | http://www.MusingsoftheLame.com CONTENTS Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 5 Adoption: Applying the Business Model .................................................................................................... 5 The Orphans Trains .................................................................................................................................. 6 Baby Farms: A Brief Glimpse of Reality .................................................................................................... 7 Introducing Social Work into The Adoption Industry ................................................................................. 7 Eugenics, Genetics and Choice ................................................................................................................ 7 Eugenics: ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Nature verses Nurture:..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intercountry Adoption
    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Overseas Adoption in Australia Report on the inquiry into adoption of children from overseas House of Representatives Standing Committee on Family and Human Services November 2005 Canberra © Commonwealth of Australia 2005 ISBN 0 642 78649 6 (printed version) ISBN 0 642 78650 2 (HTML version) Front cover: Photograph by Jeff Camden, The Courier-Mail Back cover: Photograph by Rev Ted Sherrin Cover design: Publishing Office, Department of the House of Representatives Appendix H: ‘The Nature and Nurture of Economic Outcomes‘ by Bruce Sacerdote is produced with the author’s permission Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................................vii Membership of the Committee ............................................................................................................xi Terms of reference............................................................................................................................xiii List of abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................xv List of recommendations ..................................................................................................................xvii 1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................1 Attitudes to Adoption in Australia..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Justice for Magdalenes (Jfm) Ireland
    Crocknahattina, Bailieborough Co. Cavan, Ireland Telephone/Fax: (353) 86 4059491 Web: www.magdalenelaundries.com Email: [email protected] JUSTICE FOR MAGDALENES (JFM) IRELAND Submission to the United Nations Committee Against Torture 46th Session May 2011 Justice for Magdalenes (JFM) is a non-profit, all-volunteer organisation which seeks to respectfully promote equality and advocate for justice and support for the women formerly incarcerated in Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries. Many of JFM’s members are women who were in Magdalene Laundries, and its core coordinating committee, which has been working on this issue in an advocacy capacity for over twelve years, includes several daughters of women who were in Magdalene Laundries, some of whom are also adoption rights activists. JFM also has a very active advisory committee, comprised of academics, legal scholars, politicians, and survivors of child abuse. More information is available at www.magdalenelaundries.com. 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries were residential, commercial and for-profit laundries operated by four Irish orders of nunsi where between the foundation of the Irish Free State in 1922ii and 1996, when the last institution closed, a number of girls and women, estimated in the tens of thousands,iii were imprisoned, forced to carry out unpaid labour and subjected to severe psychological and physical maltreatment. 1.2 The women and girls who suffered in the Magdalene Laundries included those who were perceived to be “promiscuous”, were unmarried mothers, were the daughters of unmarried mothers, were considered a burden on their families or the State, had been sexually abused, or had grown up in the care of the Church and State.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trouble with the Christian Adoption Movement | New Republic
    2/14/2017 The Trouble With the Christian Adoption Movement | New Republic Chris Hondros / Getty Images The Trouble With the Christian Adoption Movement Evangelical Americans believed adoption could save children in the developing world from poverty—and save their souls. BY KATHRYN JOYCE January 11, 2016 In 2009 a Tennessee couple made a life-changing decision. As devout Christians, they decided to open their home to an orphaned girl from Ethiopia, whom they were told had been abandoned. They knew enough from fellow adoptive parents to expect that the process would be long and hard, but as they were waiting for their application to go through, something unexpected happened. A number of Ethiopian staff at their adoption agency were arrested for transporting children to a different region of the country where they could claim the children had been abandoned. (Following a glut of adoption cases where children were said to have been abandoned in the capital city of Addis Ababa, the court had temporarily stopped processing “abandonment adoptions” of children from the city, but were still allowing cases from elsewhere in the country.) The stories about where the children came from—whether they were abandoned orphans whose parents were unknown, or their parents were poor and had willingly given them up—seemed to change from day to day. Concerned, but by now committed to the child they’d come to think of as their future daughter, the Tennessee family went ahead with the adoption. But, as I wrote in my book The Child Catchers, after they brought the girl back to the United States and she learned https://newrepublic.com/article/127311/trouble-christian-adoption-movement 1/9 2/14/2017 The Trouble With the Christian Adoption Movement | New Republic enough English to say so, she told them she had another mother.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magdalene Laundries
    Ireland’s Silences: the Magdalene Laundries By Nathalie Sebbane Thanks to the success of Peter Mullan’s film The Magdalene Sisters, Magdalene laundries—institutions meant to punish Ireland’s “fallen” women—are now part of the country’s collective memory. Despite tremendous social advances, survivors still await reparation and an official apology. In 2016, the centenary of the 1916 Easter Rising was commemorated with great fanfare, but another anniversary went almost unnoticed. Yet it was on September 25, 1996, that Ireland’s last remaining Magdalene laundry closed its doors. These institutions, made infamous by Peter Mullan’s 2003 feature film, The Magdalene Sisters, are now part of Ireland’s collective memory. But what memory is this? And what Ireland does it relate to? It is estimated that since the creation of the Irish Free State in 1922, around 10,000 girls and women were referred to these institutions, staying there from a month up to several decades. Magdalene laundries however, had been in existence in Ireland since the 18th century under other guises and other names. Their origin can even be traced to 13th-century Italy. Yet at a time when Ireland is looking to redefine its national identity and fully embrace modernity with the legalisation of same-sex marriage in 2015 and the repeal of the 8th amendment on abortion on May 25, 2018, it seems relevant to commemorate the closure of the last laundry and revisit the history of Magdalene laundries. Though they were not an Irish invention strictly speaking, they remain one of the key elements of what historian James Smith has called “Ireland’s architecture of containment”—a system which erases vulnerable groups destined to ‘disappear’ in Irish society, whether in Magdalene laundries, Industrial Schools or Mother and Baby Homes.
    [Show full text]
  • State Involvement in the Magdalene Laundries
    This redacted version is being made available for public circulation with permission from those who submitted their testimonies State involvement in the Magdalene Laundries JFM’s principal submissions to the Inter-departmental Committee to establish the facts of State involvement with the Magdalene Laundries Compiled by1: Dr James M. Smith, Boston College & JFM Advisory Committee Member Maeve O’Rourke, JFM Advisory Committee Member 2 Raymond Hill, Barrister Claire McGettrick, JFM Co-ordinating Committee Member With Additional Input From: Dr Katherine O’Donnell, UCD & JFM Advisory Committee Member Mari Steed, JFM Co-ordinating Committee Member 16th February 2013 (originally circulated to TDs on 18th September 2012) 1. Justice for Magdalenes (JFM) is a non-profit, all-volunteer organisation which seeks to respectfully promote equality and advocate for justice and support for the women formerly incarcerated in Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries. Many of JFM’s members are women who were in Magdalene Laundries, and its core coordinating committee, which has been working on this issue in an advocacy capacity for over twelve years, includes several daughters of women who were in Magdalene Laundries, some of whom are also adoption rights activists. JFM also has a very active advisory committee, comprised of academics, legal scholars, politicians, and survivors of child abuse. 1 The named compilers assert their right to be considered authors for the purposes of the Copyright and Related Rights Act 2000. Please do not reproduce without permission from JFM (e-mail: [email protected]). 2 Of the Bar of England and Wales © JFM 2012 Acknowledgements Justice for Magdalenes (JFM) gratefully acknowledges The Ireland Fund of Great Britain for its recent grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Webinar Outline Who Are You Where You Are?
    10/18/2017 Identity Development For Webinar Outline Birth/First Parents Adopted Persons & Adoptive Parents • Influences on Identity Development November 6, 2017 • Interventions for Positive Identity Formation [email protected] (518) 281‐8884 • Transracial Adoption Issues www.adoptioncounselingny.com CULTURE PERSONAL HISTORY… COMMUNITY… Who Are You Military, medical RACE Neighborhood, language INTERESTS RELIGION VOCATION…Student, MARITAL ETHNICITY career STATUS SEXUAL FAMILY …history, ORIENTATION traditions, birth order, values FRIENDS PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS…abilities, gender, looks, values IDENTITY A Life Long Process Donaldson Adoption Institute Beyond Culture Camp: Promoting Healthy Where You Are? Identity in Adoption Home, Community, Online, Extended Family, Employment, With Individuals of Your Race/Culture, History, House of Workshop 1 10/18/2017 Foster Care & Adoption Communities Time in History Baby Scoop Era • Foster Care • Family Court 1945‐ early1970s • Residential Treatment 1951‐‐‐ 33,800 infant adoptions Center 1970 peak of BSE • Special Education 89,200 infant adoptions Options Counseling Extended Family Individualized assessment and information sharing process where women and men who are experiencing an untimely pregnancy are assisted in objectively evaluation their options for parenting, relinquishing their child for adoption, pregnancy termination, or temporarily having their child in foster care or with a relative School Assignments Kinship Adoption New Family Roles OR 2 10/18/2017 Race & Current Events Adopted Individuals Get Message that Parents Can’t Handle Race Issues Community that Reflects the Person Racial Microaggressions Microaggressions Brief and commonplace daily verbal, behavioral, or environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative…slights and insults towards [the marginalized group ‐ Derald Sue 2007 3 10/18/2017 Society’s Message Adoption is Second Rate vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Adoption Support for Adoptive Families in Australia: Is It Time for the ‘Triple-A’ Approach?
    POST-ADOPTION SUPPORT FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES IN AUSTRALIA: IS IT TIME FOR THE ‘TRIPLE-A’ APPROACH? POST-ADOPTION SUPPORT FOR ADOPTIVE FAMILIES IN AUSTRALIA: Is it time for the ‘triple A’ approach? Adopt Change Research, November 2016 Researcher: Dr Tanya Bretherton About Adopt Change About the Researcher Adopt Change believes that every child has a right to Dr Tanya Bretherton is a Sydney-based grow up in a permanent, stable and loving home, and research consultant, sociologist and writer. embraces adoption as a positive and important way Dr Bretherton has twenty years experience in the of forming that family. fields of early childhood development, education and care, organisational culture and professional Adopt Change’s mission is: development. She has published both domestically • to raise community awareness and internationally on a wide range of issues that • encourage ethical reform impact the safety and security of children and • empower Australian’s to engage with issues young people. surrounding adoption For more information contact [email protected] www.adoptchange.org.au 2 © Copyright Adopt Change Limited 2016 Executive Summary Adoption practice in Australia now stands at a cross-road. Over the past two decades researchers, lawyers and practitioners in the child protection field have aligned their efforts around the core concept of transparency in adoption. The social and emotional damage caused by the history of closed adoption in Australia is now widely acknowledged. Improved openness in adoption now represents the prevailing goal of current and emerging practice work because this is argued to yield strong benefits for children in terms of healthy attachment and identity development.
    [Show full text]
  • TITLE: General Public Perceptions and Motivations to Adopt Children From
    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Cambridge University Press in Children Australia on 19 August 2019, available online: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/children-australia/article/general-public-perceptions-and-motivations-to- adopt-children-from-outofhome-care-in-new-south-wales-australia/C3316DA7782CC8B1A682A8C9D7AF95CD TITLE: General public perceptions and motivations to adopt children from out-of-home care in New South Wales, Australia AUTHORS: Dr Betty Luu, Research Associate, Institute of Open Adoption Studies, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia [email protected] Associate Professor Amy Conley Wright, Director, Institute of Open Adoption Studies, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Australia [email protected] Professor Melanie Randle, Associate Dean (Research), School of Management, Operations and Marketing, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong [email protected] CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Betty Luu, [email protected] +61 2 8627 6575 Education Building A35, The University of Sydney NSW 2006 Abstract: Recent reforms in New South Wales, Australia, prioritise adoption over long-term foster care. While previous research has examined motivation to foster, less is known about the interest by the general public in adoption from out-of-home care. A general sample of the New South Wales public (N = 1030) completed an online survey about adoption practices and their willingness to consider adopting from out-of-home care, with background questions on perceived social support and life satisfaction. Barriers to pursuing adoption were identified, including concerns about the characteristics of the child related to their experiences of care, and personal impacts including financial costs.
    [Show full text]