Salt-Desert Shrub Ranges Is Blue Grama (Bouteloua Gracilis)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salt-Desert Shrub Ranges Is Blue Grama (Bouteloua Gracilis) This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. United States Department of Agriculture Managing Forest Service Intermountain Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Ogden, UT 84401 Rangelands­ General Technical Report INT-163 June 1984 Salt-Desert :.!~ ::~ Shrub Ranges James P. Blaisdell Ralph C. Holmgren PREFACE THE AUTHORS JAMES P. BLAISDELL has retired from the position of Managers and users of salt-desert shrub rangelands Assistant Station Director for Research at the Inter­ will find this publication to be a reference summary to mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, aid in planning and decisionmaking. This is not a com­ Ogden, Utah. He earned a B.S. degree in range prehensive literature review, but rather a distillation of management from Utah State University in 1939, an some of the most useful information for on-the-ground M.S. degree in range management from the University management. Two manuals-Hutchings and Stewart of Idaho in 1942, and a Ph.D. degree in plant ecology (1953) and Hutchings (1954)-were based on the early from the University of Minnesota in 1956. During his years of grazing research at the USDA Forest Service's 35-year career in Forest Service research, he par­ Desert Experimental Range (DER). They have been ticipated in and supervised range research programs, valuable guides for managers for three decades and, mostly in the Intermountain West. although out of print, are still useful. More recent ex­ RALPH C. HOLMGREN has retired from the position of perience at the DER, as well as much research infor­ range scientist at the Intermountain Station, Provo, mation from other sources, warrants the broader Utah. He earned a B.S. degree from Brigham Young updated summary in this publication. University in botany. He served as a Forest Service Because much of the content herein derives from research scientist for 30 years, the last 20 years of work at one location in the eastern part of the Great which he specialized in studies of salt-desert shrub Basin-the DER-specific results may not all be ranges at the Desert Experimental Range. directly appl icable to other salt-desert shrub areas. Although general concepts, principles, and recommen­ CONTENTS Page dations can be extended to distant salt-desert shrub lands, caution and professional judgment should be Introduction ........................................................................ 1 exercised in extrapolating the particulars. The Resource ................................................................. 2 Problems ......................................................................... 3 Important Species of the Salt-Desert Shrub RESEARCH SUMMARY Ecosystem ........................................................................ 4 Shrubby Chenopods ...................................................... 4 Salt-desert shrub rangelands cover some 40 million Shrubby Composites .................................................... 6 acres (16 million ha) of the Intermountain West. Much Grasses ........................................................................... 7 of this land was misused and damaged by unsound Perennial Forbs ............................................................. 8 grazing practices in pioneer times and well into the Annuals ........................................................................... 8 20th century. Plant Communities ........................................................... 9 Although productivity of the desert is low, the high Climate .............................................................................. 10 quality of the range forage produced and the vastness Weather-Plant Growth Relations .............................. 11 of the area make the desert an important part of the Soil Moisture Accumulation and Depletion ............ 11 regional resource base. Its principal value is in the an­ Weather and Animals ................................................. 12 nual harvest of feed by livestock. The ecosystem is Soil-Vegetation Relations .............................................. 13 fragile and easily disrupted by improper use, but under Range Condition and Trend .......................................... 15 good management, deterioration can be reversed, con­ Vegetation Changes and Effects of dition can improve, and areas still in good condition Livestock Grazing .......................................................... 17 can remain so under grazing use. Intensity of Grazing .................................................... 35 A grazing system compatible with other values of Season of Grazing ....................................................... 35 salt-desert shrub lands is one where grazing Recommended Grazing Management .......................... 37 allotments are used as winter and early spring range, System .......................................................................... 38 with each allotment grazed as several small units, Stocking Rate .............................................................. 39 each unit to be fully and properly harvested during one Animal Distribution ..................................................... 40 short period before the animals move on to the next Animal Nutrition .............................................................. 41 one. With annual rotation of season of use of units Range Pests ..................................................................... 42 and frequent years of rest from grazing on some of Insects .......................................................................... 42 them, the harvest can be taken without detriment to Rodents and Rabbits .................................................. 42 soil stability, wildlife and game can thrive in their Annual Weeds .............................................................. 43 natural habitat, and the esthetic quality of the desert's Revegetation .................................................................... 44 vast emptiness can be enjoyed. Integration of Multiple Uses and Values .................... 45 Wildlife .......................................................................... 45 Recreation .................................................................... 46 Soil Stabilization ......................................................... 46 Conclusions and Summary ............................................ 47 The Range and the Vegetation ................................. 47 Weather and Soil ......................................................... 47 Condition and Trend ................................................... 48 Wildlife and Range Pests .......................................... 48 The Principle Use: Grazing of Livestock ................. 48 References ....................................................................... 49 Managing Intermountain Shrub Ranges James P. Blaisdell Ralph C. Holmgren INTRODUCTION THE NORTH AMERICAN DESERT Deserts of North America were described by Shreve (1942) in a comprehensive review where he recognized four major deserts: Great Basin, Mojave, Sonoran, and Chihuahuan (fig. 1).He characterized their vegetation as predominantly shrubby. The Great Basin Desert is the northernmost of the four and includes all of the Great Basin physiographic province (Fenneman 1931) as well as adjacent parts of the Columbia and Colorado Plateaus. It extends into the Harney Basin of Oregon, the Snake River Plains of Idaho, the Red Desert of southwestern Wyoming, the western border of Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, and northern Arizona The Great Basin Desert is largely above 4,000 ft (1 200 m), summers are warm and winters are cold, and annual precipitation is mostly between 4 and 10 inches (10 and 25 em). However, the absence of a protracted dry season and the presence of moderate temperatures that result from higher latitudes and altitudes provide more favorable moisture conditions than the low-precipitation indicates. The two major plant communities of the Great Basin Desert are sagebrush-grass and salt-desert shrub, which are dominated by Artemisia tridentata and Atriplex con- fertifolia, respectively. Sagebrush-grass vegetation, which occupies some 100 million acres (40 million ha) of western rangeland, has been treated recently in a com- panion publication (Blaisdell and others 1982) and will not be considered further herein. Although estimates of the area dominated by salt-desert shrub vegetation vary 'l. considerably (Branson and others 1967; Hutchings and Figure 1.-Deserts of North America (after Stewart 1953), 40 million acres (16 million ha) is a Shreve 1942). reasonable figure for this important range ecosystem (Holmgren and Hutchings 1972). General location of this vegetation type is shown in figure 2. and the Big Horn Basin and Red Desert of Wyoming are Salt-desert shrub vegetation occurs mostly in two examples. Soils derived from these formations are so kinds of situations that promote soil salinity, alkalinity, salty and fine textured that they create salt-desert shrub or both. These are either at the bottom of drainages in habitat in a climate that would normally produce enclosed basins (bolsons) or where marine shales outcrop grassland. On the other hand, Billings (1949) described a (West 1982a). The bolsons of the Great Basin, where shadscale community in western Nevada as occupying salts and fine-textured fluvials or lacustrine materials not only the dry lake sediments with
Recommended publications
  • Catch, Treat and Release with Limited Removal
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Environmental Assessments (WY) Wyoming 2011 Catch, Treat and Release with Limited Removal Red Desert Complex Wild Horse Herd Management Areas (Lost Creek, Stewart Creek, Green Mountain, Crooks Mountain, Antelope Hills) United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wyoming_enviroassess Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, "Catch, Treat and Release with Limited Removal Red Desert Complex Wild Horse Herd Management Areas (Lost Creek, Stewart Creek, Green Mountain, Crooks Mountain, Antelope Hills)" (2011). Environmental Assessments (WY). Paper 28. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wyoming_enviroassess/28 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Wyoming at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Environmental Assessments (WY) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment WY-050-EA11-78 Catch, Treat and Release with limited Removal Red Desert Complex Wild Horse Herd Management Areas (Lost Creek, Stewart Creek, Green Mountain, Crooks Mountain, Antelope Hills) Location: Rawlins & Lander, Wyoming Applicant/Address: Bureau of Land Management 1300 North Third Street, P.O. Box 2407 Rawlins, Wyoming 82301 Bureau of Land Management 1335 Main Street, P. O. Box 589 Lander, Wyoming 82520 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Rawlins & Lander Field Offices Rawlins - 307-328-4200 Fax – 307-328-4224 Lander - 307-332-8400 Fax – 307-332-8444 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Purpose and Need ................................………………………………………………………………………………………………5 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Red Desert Complex Gather EA
    Environmental Assessment Red Desert Complex Herd Management Area Gather DOI-BLM-WY-030-EA15-63 September 2017 Prepared by: U.S. Bureau of Land Management U.S. Bureau of Land Management High Desert District Wind River Big Horn Basin District Office Rawlins Field Office Lander Field Office 1300 North Third Street 1335 Main Street Rawlins, Wyoming 82301 Lander, Wyoming 83520 Mission Statement To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. DOI-BLM-WY-030-EA15-63 Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Decision to be made ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Scoping ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED .................................................................................... 5 2.1 Actions Common to Alternative 1 and Alternative 2: Proposed Action ............................ 5 2.2 Alternative 1: Remove all wild horses outside of HMA boundaries and utilize
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Growing Pains at 60
    Viewpoints Special Edition Israel: Growing Pains at 60 The Middle East Institute Washington, DC Middle East Institute The mission of the Middle East Institute is to promote knowledge of the Middle East in Amer- ica and strengthen understanding of the United States by the people and governments of the region. For more than 60 years, MEI has dealt with the momentous events in the Middle East — from the birth of the state of Israel to the invasion of Iraq. Today, MEI is a foremost authority on contemporary Middle East issues. It pro- vides a vital forum for honest and open debate that attracts politicians, scholars, government officials, and policy experts from the US, Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. MEI enjoys wide access to political and business leaders in countries throughout the region. Along with information exchanges, facilities for research, objective analysis, and thoughtful commentary, MEI’s programs and publications help counter simplistic notions about the Middle East and America. We are at the forefront of private sector public diplomacy. Viewpoints are another MEI service to audiences interested in learning more about the complexities of issues affecting the Middle East and US rela- tions with the region. To learn more about the Middle East Institute, visit our website at http://www.mideasti.org The maps on pages 96-103 are copyright The Foundation for Middle East Peace. Our thanks to the Foundation for graciously allowing the inclusion of the maps in this publication. Cover photo in the top row, middle is © Tom Spender/IRIN, as is the photo in the bottom row, extreme left.
    [Show full text]
  • Expedition 25: the Subtropics
    Expedition 25: LEVELED BOOK • R The Subtropics Expedition 25: A Reading A–Z Level R Leveled Book Word Count: 807 The Subtropics Written by Celeste Fraser Visit www.readinga-z.com www.readinga-z.com for thousands of books and materials. Photo Credits: Front cover: © Ocean/Corbis; back cover: © Matthew Weinel/Dreamstime.com; title page, page 2: © Urmas Ääro/123rf; page 3: © Frans Lanting/Terra/Corbis; pages 4, 5 (main): courtesy of Goddard Institute for Space Studies/NASA; page 5 (inset): © Penny Tweedie/Terra/Corbis; page 7: © Dreamstime.com; page 8: © REUTERS/Aladin Abdel Naby; page 9: © B. Anthony Stewart/ National Geographic Stock; page 10: Elgru/Dreamstime.com; page 11: © Kaspars Grinvalds/Dreamstime.com; page 12: © Geddy/Dreamstime.com; Expedition 25: page 13: © iStockphoto.com/Blake Ford; page 14 (top): © Tui de Roy/Minden Pictures/National Geographic Stock; page 14 (bottom): © Jim Brandenburg/ Minden Pictures/National Geographic Stock; page 15: © Annie Griffiths Belt/ The Subtropics National Geographic Stock Teacher’s note: This book is part of the Trip on a Latitude Line series of books on geography and exploration. Expedition 25: The Subtropics Level R Leveled Book © Learning A–Z Correlation Written by Celeste Fraser Written by Celeste Fraser LEVEL R Illustrated by Craig Frederick Fountas & Pinnell N All rights reserved. Reading Recovery 30 www.readinga-z.com www.readinga-z.com DRA 30 Cairo, ASIA EUROPE NORTH Sahara Egypt AMERICA Desert NORTH 25° LATITUDE AFRICA Ayers Rock Equator SOUTH Riyadh, AMERICA Saudi Arabia SOUTH 25° LATITUDE AUSTRALIA Atacama Namib Desert Desert ANTARCTICA Table of Contents Expedition 25 Expedition 25 .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming's Northern Red Desert
    Sinks Canyon’s Disappearing River Disappearing Canyon’s Sinks highway Scott Copeland Farson paved road paved gravel road gravel 191 BUTTES OREGON BUTTES HONEYCOMB HONEYCOMB Red Canyon Scenic Overlook Scenic Canyon Red CREEK Scott Copeland WHITEHORSE 445 28 Oregon Buttes Road (Fremont County Road 445). 445). Road County (Fremont Road Buttes Oregon and drive southwest for 33 miles. Turn left onto onto left Turn miles. 33 for southwest drive and 446 join WY 28 (do not turn left to remain on US 287) 287) US on remain to left turn not (do 28 WY join miles until the junction with WY 28. Stay straight to to straight Stay 28. WY with junction the until miles Rest Area Rest State Historic Site Historic State From Lander: From Drive southeast on US 287 for eight eight for 287 US on southeast Drive South Pass Pass South South Pass City City Pass South South Pass City State Historic Site Historic State City Pass South Jennie Hutchinson 445). Road County (Fremont City miles, then turn right onto Oregon Buttes Road Road Buttes Oregon onto right turn then miles, Atlantic Atlantic From Farson: From Drive northeast on WY 28 for 33 33 for 28 WY on northeast Drive from Highway 28 between Farson and Lander. and Farson between 28 Highway from S Wyoming’s Northern Red Desert is easily accessed accessed easily is Desert Red Northern Wyoming’s N here t et g to hoW I A Overlook T Road Scenic Scenic N Loop Loop is available at windriver.org at available is Red Canyon Canyon Red U More information on these driving tours tours driving these on information More O
    [Show full text]
  • North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave
    North American Deserts Chihuahuan - Great Basin Desert - Sonoran – Mojave http://www.desertusa.com/desert.html In most modern classifications, the deserts of the United States and northern Mexico are grouped into four distinct categories. These distinctions are made on the basis of floristic composition and distribution -- the species of plants growing in a particular desert region. Plant communities, in turn, are determined by the geologic history of a region, the soil and mineral conditions, the elevation and the patterns of precipitation. Three of these deserts -- the Chihuahuan, the Sonoran and the Mojave -- are called "hot deserts," because of their high temperatures during the long summer and because the evolutionary affinities of their plant life are largely with the subtropical plant communities to the south. The Great Basin Desert is called a "cold desert" because it is generally cooler and its dominant plant life is not subtropical in origin. Chihuahuan Desert: A small area of southeastern New Mexico and extreme western Texas, extending south into a vast area of Mexico. Great Basin Desert: The northern three-quarters of Nevada, western and southern Utah, to the southern third of Idaho and the southeastern corner of Oregon. According to some, it also includes small portions of western Colorado and southwestern Wyoming. Bordered on the south by the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts. Mojave Desert: A portion of southern Nevada, extreme southwestern Utah and of eastern California, north of the Sonoran Desert. Sonoran Desert: A relatively small region of extreme south-central California and most of the southern half of Arizona, east to almost the New Mexico line.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 5 Spring 2015
    Utah Shrubland Management Issue 5, Spring 2015 Page 1 The Spring 2015 Project Updates and Field Tour Information Newsletter highlights The field crew members on the Shrub Management Project are now preparing for our study site in Park their third summer of data collection after management actions were initiated in spring of 2013. It’s an exciting year to see the effects of herbicide, mowing,Page and 1 seed- Valley, UT. The ranch ing treatments on a diverse group of shrub, grass, and forb species. With two study where we work is sites per ranch, we can begin to compare how response to management varies be- tween closely related ecological sites. owned and operated The big news this season is that over the next two months, we’re hosting tours of our by Lance West- field sites to share our initial project results. All who are interested in rangelands— moreland and family; management practitioners, property owners, students, neighbors—are invited to come learn about the Utah shrub management project. Ecologists from USDA-ARS greasewood is the and Utah State University will be leading discussions about brush management meth- targeted shrub. ods and ecological sites at our four study locations (details below). The tours will also include presentations by state and county conser- vation agencies (DWR, NRCS, Utah State Extension) on topics such as exotic species control, juniper encroachment, seeding, and wildfire management. Lunches will be provided for tour attendees. This will be a great opportunity to learn about current approaches in range management, come join us! Photo: Beth Burritt CONTENTS 2015 Summer Field Tour Schedule Project Birdseye & Cedar Fort (Central UT) - See enclosed flyer May 20 1 Updates Targeted Shrubs: Rubber Rabbitbrush & Snakeweed Park Valley ranch: Partners: NRCS, DWR, UACD Zone 3 Overview of 2 Time: 9am — 4pm ecological sites Park Valley (North-Western UT) - See enclosed flyer June 2 Greasewood: Targeted Shrub: Black Greasewood Natural history 5 Partners: West Box Elder Coord.
    [Show full text]
  • Phreatophytes
    Phreatophytes By T. W. ROBINSON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1423 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. Price 40 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract ................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................ 2 Acknowledgments ......................................... 2 Use of ground water by phreatophytes ..................... 3 Evidence ............................................... 3 Effect .................................................. 3 Future considerations ..................................... 7 Definitions ................................................. 9 The hydrologic cycle ........................................ 10 Plants classified as phreatophytes ............................ 12 Scientific and common names .............................. 13 Factors affecting occurrence of phreatophytes ................ 13 Climate .................................................. 14 Depth to water ........................................... 14 Quality of ground water .................................. 15 Factors affecting the use of ground water by phreatophytes...... 16 Climatic conditions ....................................... 17 Depth to water ........................................... 22 Density of growth .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Desert-Driving-Tour-Map
    to the northeast and also marks a crossing of the panorama of desert, buttes, and wild lands. A short South Pass Historical Marker the vistas you see here are remarkably similar to Hikers can remain along the rim or drop down into Honeycomb Buttes historic freight and stage road used to haul supplies walk south reveals the mysterious Pinnacles. The South Pass area of the Red Desert has been a those viewed by thousands of travelers in the past. the basin. Keep an eye out for fossils, raptors, and The Honeycomb Buttes Wilderness Study Area is to South Pass City. See map for recommended hiking human migration pathway for millennia. The crest A side road from the county road will take you to bobcat tracks. one of the most mesmerizing and difficult-to-access access roads for hiking in this wilderness study area. The Jack Morrow Hills several historical markers memorializing South Pass of the Rocky Mountains flattens out onto high-el- landscapes in the Northern Red Desert. These The Great Divide Basin The Jack Morrow Hills, named for a 19th-century evation steppes, allowing easy passage across and the historic trails. Oregon Buttes badlands are made of colorful sedimentary rock crook and homesteader, run north-south between the Continental Divide. Native Americans and their The Oregon Buttes, another wilderness study layers shed from the rising Wind River Mountains As you drive through this central section of the the Oregon Buttes and Steamboat Mountain and ancestors crossed Indian Gap to the south and Whitehorse Creek Overlook area, stand proudly along the Continental Divide, millions of years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild God in the Wilderness: Why Does Yahweh Choose to Appear in the Wilderness in the Book of Exodus?
    WILD GOD IN THE WILDERNESS: WHY DOES YAHWEH CHOOSE TO APPEAR IN THE WILDERNESS IN THE BOOK OF EXODUS? by NARELLE JANE COETZEE A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Philosophy, Theology and Religion College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham June 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT: The wilderness is an unlikely place for Yahweh to appear; yet some of the most profound encounters between Yahweh and ancient Israel occur in this isolated, barren, arid and marginal landscape. Thus, via John A. Beck’s narrative-geography method, which prioritises the role of the geographical setting of the biblical narrative, the question of ‘why does Yahweh choose to appear in the wilderness?’ is examined in reference to four Exodus theophanic passages (Exodus 3:1-4:17, 19:1-20:21, 24:9-18 and 33:18-34). First, a biblical working definition of the wilderness is developed, and the specific geographic elements in each passage discussed. Subsequently, the characterisation of Yahweh’s appearances is investigated, via the signs Yahweh used to appear, the words Yahweh speaks and the human experience of Yahweh in the wilderness space.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Intermountain Rangelands
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. TREATMENT OF INLAND SALTGRASS AND GREASEWOOD SITES TO IMPROVE FORAGE PRODUCTION Bruce A. Roundy, Greg J. Cluff, James A. Young, and R. A. Evans ABSTRACT: Greasewood and saltgrass sites that Greasewood and saltgrass dominated plant once supported basin wildrye can be highly communities generally occur in these lowland productive after chemical brush control and floodplains and basins below the upper and forage restoration by proper management or by higher precipitation sagebrush zone that seeding. Application of 2,4-D in June, once or Billings (1945) considered edaphic climates for 2 consecutive years, effectively controls within the drier shadscale zone. These sites greasewood and salt rabbitbrush. Associated are characterized by low precipitation of 5 to saline soils can be successfully seeded to 10 inches (12 to 25 em) annually, saline and salt-tolerant grasses such as basin wildrye and fine textured soils, a shallow wa~er table and tall wheatgrass by using irrigation or on sites in some areas, seasonal flooding. Plant growth where salinity is low and in years when spring and distribution are affected by total soil precipitation is high. salinity, concentrations of specific ions, and depth of soil salts, soil areation, and depth SITE DESCRIPTION AND POTENTIAL of the watertable and salinity of ground water, total soil water potential as affected by salts The decisions of how to manage or treat a (soil osmotic potential) and water content specific site to increase forage production are (soil matric potential) and the seasonal most dependent upon the site potential and variability of these factors.
    [Show full text]