DOCSLIB.ORG

1 East Hampshire District Council Penns Place, Petersfield

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 East Hampshire District Council Penns Place, Petersfield East Hampshire District Council Penns Place, Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX Chief Executive: Sandy Hopkins East Hampshire District Council Minutes of the Licensing Sub-Committee meeting held on Friday 24 th June 2011 at 11.30am in the Council Chamber, Penns Place, Petersfield. Present: Councillors Bob Ayer, Angela Glass and Marge Harvey. Officers: Principal Licensing Officer, Solicitor, Committee Services Co-ordinator and Committee and Councillors’ Support Officer. The following were also present: Graeme Marley, Regional Manager, for Enterprise Inns, the applicants Clare Johnson, Solicitor for Enterprise Inns, the applicants; Dennis Thomas, interested party; Thelma Thomas, interested party; and Brian Griffiths, interested party. 6. Election of Chairman Resolved that Councillor Bob Ayer be elected Chairman of the Sub- Committee for the Hearing. 7. Apologies for Absence There were no apologies for absence. 8. Chairman’s Announcements The Chairman made the following announcements: • Asked that all mobile phones be switched off; and • Made all those present aware of the nearest fire exits. 9. Declarations of Interest None were declared. 1 Licensing Hearing Minutes 24.06.11 - 2 10. Licensing Act 2003 – Application for a Premises Licence – Windmill Inn, Winchester Road, Four Marks, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 5HG The Sub-Committee considered the report of the Principal Licensing Officer, EXJR.30/11, which had been previously circulated. The Principal Licensing Officer stated that the report related to an application made by Enterprise Inns for a Premises Licence for the Windmill Inn, Winchester Road, Four Marks. The report contained details of the licensing activities requested on pages five to seven of the agenda. The applicant had stated steps to be taken to promote the four licensing objectives and these were shown on page three of the agenda. The hearing had been called because a representation had been received from the responsible authority, Environment Protection and interested parties living in the vicinity of the premises. Representative extracts of the representations were shown on pages eight to eleven of the agenda and shown in full in Appendix C of the report. The application named the proposed Designated Premises Supervisor as Paul Ryan. He was a director of the company that held the previous premises licence and it was understood that he might no longer have a connection with the Windmill Inn. The applicant would be able to advise further on this point. The Principal Licensing Officer had not attempted to arrange mediation as this matter remained outstanding. The Sub-Committee was advised that in determining the application: 1. it may grant the application as asked; 2. modify the conditions of the licence, by altering, omitting, or adding to them; 3. refuse to specify a person in the licence as the premises supervisor; or 4. reject the whole or part of the application. Clare Johnson, Solicitor for Enterprise Inns PLC asked the Principal Licensing Officer if Environmental Services had withdrawn their objections following agreement by the applicant to the conditions requested. She had been in communication with Environmental Services on behalf of the applicant and on the 13 th June 2011 had confirmed the exact wording of the conditions. She had also written asking them to confirm the withdrawal of their objections. Dennis Thomas, interested party raised a concern about the procedures when informing interested parties of the hearing. He asked the Principal Licensing Officer to confirm that all interested parties had received information about the hearing. He advised the Sub-Committee that he and his wife had had to approach the Licensing Services Team as their pack of information had been misaddressed. In chance conversations with other interested parties he understood that Mr Neil Vine at 7 Hazel Road, whose objections could be found in Appendix C of the report, had not received a pack. Another resident 2 Licensing Hearing Minutes 24.06.11 - 2 at No 2 Fairlight Gardens had sent his objections by email, but it was understood that these objections had never been received. The Principal Licensing Officer in reply said that she could confirm that there was no record of any representations being received from the resident at No 2 Fairlight Gardens. She was unable to confirm that the pack had been sent to 7 Hazel Road. Cllr Ayer asked how significant it was that an interested party might not have received the pack about the hearing. Clare Johnson addressed the Sub-Committee and said that she was happy for the hearing to continue. Whether the pack had been received was irrelevant as it was deemed to have been received two days after being sent. The Sub-Committee adjourned at 11.42am to enable the Principal Licensing Officer to confirm if the pack had been sent to the correct address. The Sub-Committee reconvened at 11.55am The Principal Licensing Officer confirmed that a letter had not been sent to Mr Vine. It was a matter for the Chairman and Sub-Committee to decide whether to proceed with the hearing. The Principal Licensing Officer said that all information had been received and valid representations were included in the agenda. The Chairman said that it was regrettable but he believed that the Sub- Committee was capable of conducting the hearing, representations had been received and recorded and the Sub-Committee would look at those representations with extra care. Clare Johnson for the applicants said that they would like the hearing to go ahead as the views were echoed in other representations and therefore the concerns could be put across. Dennis Thomas said that it was worrying that there had been a need to check on the information and gave no confidence in the process. The Principal Licensing Officer apologised to all concerned. Brian Griffiths, interested party asked the Principal Licensing Officer about the conditions proposed on the licence in Appendix C to the report. In particular that noise from the premises shall be inaudible after 22.00hrs at the boundary of the nearest residential property. He lived at the nearest property and could confirm that he could hear people in the kitchen at this time. Did inaudible mean no noise should be heard? The Principal Licensing Officer confirmed that inaudible meant that the noise should not be heard. 3 Licensing Hearing Minutes 24.06.11 - 2 The EHDC Solicitor informed the meeting that the condition was frequently used in the District and nationwide. Dennis Griffiths asked about Paul Ryan, who on the application was the Designated Premises Supervisor and his association with the application. The Principal Licensing Officer said that it would be better to wait for the applicant to explain the current situation. Clare Johnson, Solicitor for the applicant addressed the Sub-Committee. She explained that she represented Enterprise Inns PLC, they were the freehold owners and landlord of the premises. Enterprise Inns PLC owned properties around the country and let them out to tenants who then ran the business under terms and leases. If the lease was being breached then the company would take action. This was an application for a brand new premises licence, the premises had held a premises licence before and there had been a public house on the site for 100 years, it was the only one in the village. The licence for this premises had lapsed, it had been held by a company called “R&R Leisure Management Ltd” who had been leasing the property but who had gone into liquidation in 2010. Once a business became insolvent then the licence lapsed. Enterprise Inns PLC had not been aware of the situation. The applicants had inherited Paul Ryan who had been the Designated Premises Supervisor, (DPS) this could only be removed if the holder had a criminal conviction or was unfit to hold the licence due to a financial situation. She confirmed that Paul Ryan was no longer the DPS for the premises. Enterprise Inns had not been aware of the issues involving the premises until they had received correspondence from the Relevant Authority and residents in the area. This was not unusual as they were only the landlords and not the premises licence holder. Clearly they were aware now and if they were granted the licence her clients would ensure that the premises would be run correctly. Graeme Marley, Regional Manager, for Enterprise Inns PLC was responsible for the premises and if the application was granted he would be vetting the next tenant very carefully. The aspiration for the premises was that it would be a family friendly dining pub. She acknowledged that there was a need for a community pubic house which residents of the village could enjoy and attend. The application before the Sub-Committee was identical to the previous licence, except for timings over Christmas and the New Year and there was no request for a licence for adult entertainment. Clare Johnson then referred to the representations made by Environmental Services against the application and the request by Environmental Services for three conditions to be added to the licence. In respect of inaudibility of noise there were tests that could be done. If issues were so extreme then 4 Licensing Hearing Minutes 24.06.11 - 2 residents should contact the Licensing Authority or Environmental Services. They would carry out checks and tests on the noise levels. She believed that this was the time to forget the past and move forward. It was not so much a premises issue, but the way in which the premises had been run in the past. Her clients had taken on board all the comments by Environmental Services and had put in place measures to reduce public nuisance to an acceptable amount, taking into consideration comments by them and residents.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SITUATION of POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency
    SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS UK Parliamentary East Hampshire Constituency Date of Election: Thursday 8 June 2017 Hours of Poll: 7:00 am to 10:00 pm Notice is hereby given that: The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Ranges of electoral Ranges of electoral Station register numbers of Station register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote Number persons entitled to vote thereat thereat Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy 1 AA-1 to AA-1848 2 AB-1 to AB-1961 Alton Street, Alton St Mary`s R C Church Hall, 59 Normandy Holybourne Village Hall, Church Lane, 3 AC-1 to AC-2083 4 AD-1 to AD-1558 Street, Alton Holybourne, Alton Alton Community Centre, Amery Street, 5 AE-1 to AE-2380 All Saints Parish Hall, Queens Road, Alton 6 AF-1 to AF-2418 Alton St John Ambulance Hq, Edgar Hall, Anstey Beech Village Hall, Wellhouse Road, 7 AG-1 to AG-1775/1 8 AH-1 to AH-484/4 Lane Beech Bentworth Jubilee Hall, Church Street, Bentley Memorial Hall, Hole Lane, Bentley 9 AI-1 to AI-892 10 AJ-1 to AJ-465 Bentworth Binsted Sports Pavillion, The Sports Jolly Farmer Public House (Skittle Alley), 11 AKA-1 to AKA-562 12 AKB-1 to AKB-893 Pavillion, The Street, Binsted Binsted Road, Blacknest Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, Liphook Church Centre, Portsmouth Road, 13 AL-1 to AL-1802 14 AL-1803 to AL-3605/5 Liphook Liphook Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario Way, Liphook Millennium Centre, 2 Ontario
    [Show full text]
  • Chawton Park
    What is being proposed? Enhancing Alton’s vitality and viability EHDC Retail Study Destination 2018 Turnover Benchmark Turnover Surplus/Deficit Bentworth Alton 63.47 80.83 -17.36 Chawton Park Whitehill & Bordon 36.89 27.34 +9.55 Large Development Site Alton Liphook 38.17 27.12 +11.05 Clanfield 3.41 1.57 +1.84 Beech Four Marks 4.99 6.78 -1.79 A31 Grayshott 5.89 5.94 -0.05 Chawton Horndean 25.99 31.25 -5.26 A31 Other East Hampshire 4.11 4.11 n/a Total 182.92 184.93 -2.01 Railway Line Convenience goods actual/benchmark turnover in 2018 (£ millions) Source: EHDC 2018 Site Location Plan Employment Allocation The above table is taken from the East Hampshire Retail and Main • 1200 homes including up to 480 affordable homes Town Centre Uses Study Final Report (October 2018): Table 4.4. It • Homes at an average density of 37 dwellings per hectare shows that despite convenience goods retail sales floorspace in • Local centre of up to 1 Ha with pub, shop, community the District collectively trading just under the expected average centre and employment space (-£2.01 million) in 2018, the performance in Alton is significantly below the benchmark turnover by some £17.36million. Key design themes of proposed development: Development at Chawton Park Farm would be sure to increase • High Quality Design • Sustainable Travel Choices footfall, and therefore provide great benefit to the retail economy of • Local Distinctiveness • Civic Pride the town. Proposed Aerial View • Good connections to Nature • Use of Technology • Enhancement of Historic Context • Long-term Management Chawton Park is located less than two miles from the centre • Green Infrastructure Summary of Alton, which is ranked as the No.1 settlement in the East Hampshire District Council Settlement Hierarchy Background How has Alton grown? • The land at Chawton Park is a suitable and appropriate site Paper, December 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Walk Four Marks to Medstead
    Walk No. 5 A Circular Walk from Four Marks to Medstead 5¼ miles. Time 3 hours. GR. 672361 OS Explorer Map 132 By car: take the A31 from Alton to the village of Four Marks. Just after Charters Close turn right into Boyneswood Road and in about 1/3mile turn right into Chawton Park Wood. There is a free car park. By bus: take the 64 from Alton towards Alresford and alight just past the Four Marks sign at Telegraph Lane bus stop. Walk towards the village and at Boyneswood Road follow car directions above. By train: take the Watercress Line from Alton and alight at Medstead & Four Marks station. At the Alton end of the platform a gate (if locked ask staff to open it) leads to a footpath to Boyneswood Road. Turn left and walk mile along Boyneswood Road to Chawton ParkW ood. The Walk starts at Chawton Park grassy track to level out again and Car Park in Boyneswood Road, then descending to another grassy Medstead. The walk is on public track. footpaths although there is a small amount of road walking on Turn left along this track and in quiet lanes. The walk is mostly on about 150 yards at cross tracks level ground except for one or two (sign posted), take the path on the inclines, but no steep climbs. right which climbs uphill through Most of the stiles are sound and trees to a barrier / gate on the edge in a good state except for one or of the wood. Go through the gate two in Medstead that are broken and walk along a path between a or missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Four Marks Annual
    FOUR MARKS PARISH COUNCIL Minutes of the ANNUAL PARISH MEETING Held on Wednesday 8TH APRIL 2015, commencing at 7.30pm At the Village Hall, Four Marks __________________________________________________________________________ Four Marks’ Annual Parish Meeting was held in the Village Hall on Wednesday 8th April 2015 commencing at 7.30pm The Chairman opened the meeting by welcoming everyone, and introduced our speaker for the evening, Robin Jarman, Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner Hampshire and Isle of Wight. Following a very interesting presentation by Robin Jarman the following questions were asked: Q. Cllr Thomas, are other District Council’s funding additional PCSO’S, as East Hampshire District Council are planning to do? A. Not that he was aware of, however Simon Hayes was keen to increase them where possible. Q. Cllr Sensier. Would the priorities listed have taken place without this change? A. Mr Jarman responded by saying that they had taken on the existing police authority staff, which had been an interesting experience, staff had not increased but had changed, a good deal of networking was taking place to find out what was needed, and a communications team brought in. Q. Cllr Timms. Can you please reiterate how important is CCTV? A. Extremely important, and with its inception, the police are able to use technology to their advantage and for capturing evidence. Q. Cllr Foster. You spoke about youth engagement, how are you doing this? And, are Street pastors relevant? A. A group of youths has been compiled, although keeps changing, from all walks of life and areas, such as Winchester, Southampton and Portsmouth, and new head co-ordinator is just about to start.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 -W2W Data
    Wheels to work hirers - East Hampshire District Council August 2009 - August 2014 Rider Age Length of Referred by Urban Purpose of Did they Location End Start After loan loan or loan find destination date (months) Rural work? 1 17 11 Press release Rural Work N/A Bordon Alton 12/09 Moped/motorbike 2 19 11 Alton JCP Urban Job seeking Yes East Worldham Various 02/10 3 21 11 Employer Rural Work N/A Liss Milland 02/10 Moped/motorbike 4 22 7 Alton JCP Rural Work N/A Alton Basingstoke 04/10 Moped/motorbike 5 19 8 Community Rural Work N/A Headley Down/ Haslemere 07/10 Moped/motorbike Centre Bordon 6 17 3 Alton JCP Rural Work N/A Upper Wield Four Marks 08/18 Public tranpsort 7 19 4 Employer Rural Work N/A Medstead / Alton 09/10 Public tranpsort / Alton moved closer to work 8 20 1 Bordon JCP Rural Job seeking No Whitehill / Various 08-Oct Moped/motorbike Bordon 9 20 4 Self referal Rural Work N/A Bordon Lindford 04/10 Public transport 10 18 3 EH Youth Rural Job seeking Yes Liphook Basingstoke 07/10 Moped/motorbike Offending 11 18 5 Info via Youth Rural Job seeking Yes Headley/ Various 11/10 Moped/motorbike Tube Bordon 12 17 4 Connexions Rural Job seeking yes Liphook Various 12/10 13 19 4 Previous hirer Urban Work N/A Alton Lasham 01/11 Moped/motorbike 14 16 2 Employer Rural Work N/A Clanfield Cosham 01/11 Moped/motorbike 15 19 1 Bordon JCP Rural Job seeking Yes Bordon Petersfield 03/10 Moped/motorbike 16 20 5 Press release Urban Work N/A Alton Alton 07/10 Moped/motorbike 17 20 3 Alton JCP Rural Job seeking Yes Ropley Alton 02/10 Car 18 20 2 Employer
    [Show full text]
  • Objections to the Proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site
    11/1/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook Objections to the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site Sun 13/10/2019 07:31 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]> 1 attachments (249 KB) 0 OBJECTION to Four Marks South Large Development Site.docx; Dear Sir or Madam, Please find aached, as Word file <0 OBJECTION to Four Marks South Large Development Site.docx>, my submission of objecons to the Four Marks South Large Development Site proposal. Kind regards, ___________________________ https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/1 Objections to the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site Objections concerning Large Development Sites (Regulation 18) Consultation Questionnaire (3 September – 15 October 2019) Objection submitted by: Name: Email: Address Line 1: Post Town: Post Code: Objections submitted by email to: [email protected] And also, by post to: Planning Policy, East Hampshire District Council, Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire GU31 4EX 1 Proposed Four Marks South Large Development - Comments & Objections A Brief Summary of objections to the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site, with greater detail, fuller argumentation and source references shown below: A) General Comments and Objections based on relevant local, Council and UK Government documentation Local, East Hampshire District Council and UK Government documentation all confirm that the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site is inappropriate and contravenes, conflicts with or violates local, Council and UK Government policies (see more detailed argumentation in the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site ‘Objections in Greater Detail’ section below this ‘Brief Summary’): • The Four Marks settlement boundary does not include the land designated for the proposed Four Marks South Large Development Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Marks South Information Pack
    FOUR MARKS SOUTH LARGE DEVELOPMENT SITE INFORMATION PACK Contents Introduction 2 Site Promotion Team 2 Map of Four Marks South Large Development Site 3 Site Considerations 4 Proposed Development Opportunities 5 Understanding constraints & considerations to identify proposed development opportunities 6 Delivery and timescales 6 Meeting identified needs in a sustainable way 7 Local Communities 12 1 Introduction Four Marks South Consortium comprises a team of locally and nationally known developers. This mix brings a breadth of experience and unique balance of strategic expertise alongside a real focus on localism and community involvement. The proposals drawn together by the Consortium seek to deliver a development that reflects the national objective to provide housing in sustainable locations whilst also delivering improvements that reflect local aspirations. The delivery of community benefits has been at the forefront of the masterplanning and design approach. The relocated school will be located to enable parents and children to walk to and from it together with space for safe access for bikes and cars to be designed in, including parking for drop off and pick up. Employment land to provide space for small and start-up businesses and new jobs for local people will be provided in a location where people can walk to work. A community facility will provide space for local residents to enjoy and open space will be provided including an improved right of way and new links. The masterplan includes a care home, extra care housing and land for self-build projects to provide a diversity of new offerings and housing options. This will provide Four Marks with a wider variety of housing options and deliver space for new residents to support the viability of existing services.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Roads in Central Hants by C
    324 OLD ROADS IN CENTRAL HANTS BY C. F. C. HAWKES. Although many of the roads to be found in this country are of very great age, yet none of them are older than the earliest settlements. Villages and camps were not established, along the line of already existing roads, but roads grew up as links between settlements. Before the Saxon invasion all the villages were oh the uplands, and hence the roads followed the lines of the ridges from one to another. This was the best way for several reasons:—It was the driest, and generally avoided streams, and it lay over open ground; moreover, the safest route for travel . is always that with the widest view. But the principal reason was that the uplands were the centres of population. The oldest prehistoric roads are the long trade routes stretch- ing right across the country, which form the skeleton of the whole system: they keep, wherever possible, to the high ridge tops or just on the south brow, and where a ridge has to be crossed it is usually at a saddle with an easy gradient: for the crossing of a river valley, they generally descend by some spur with a gentle slope, and always choose a place as high up the river as possible, where the difficult wet valley is narrow. But later there grew up parallel roads beside them, which kept to the lower slopes of the ridges, and were used in dry summer weather, when travellers were not forced to get right to the crest of a ridge to find a passable road.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipers Corner
    Pipers Corner UPPER WIELD I ALRESFORD I HAMPSHIRE I SO24 9RT 4 Bedrooms | 2 Bathrooms (1 En Suite) | Entrance Hall | Kitchen/Breakfast Room with AGA | Drawing Room | Study | Utility Room | Double Garage | Mature Garden with rural rear aspect Mileages: Alton 6.5 miles, Alresford 5.3 miles, Basingstoke 11.5 miles, Winchester 12.6 miles. Stations at Alton or Basingstoke with scheduled services to London Waterloo. J7 M3 9 miles Upstairs the generous main bedroom (with en suite) has a lovely view over the garden and there are three further bedrooms and a family bathroom. On a practical level the integral double garage provides covered car parking and storage which is connected to the house by a useful utility room giving options for muddy dogs or those country walks. I Location Upper Wield is one of Hampshire’s hidden secrets on the edge of the Candover Valley. The village is positioned on high ground amongst gently rolling countryside which stretches for miles yet is conveniently positioned between Basingstoke, Alresford and Alton. The local village of Medstead is nearby with local shops and more extensive amenities are available nearby at either Alton or Alresford. The surrounding rural landscape has remained largely unaltered over many centuries. Pipers Corner is discreetly located in the village in a well landscaped and established courtyard setting with neighbouring I The Property houses for company, but privately positioned in a no through road. Pipers Corner is a comfortable house with a well-planned versatile interior. The lovely hall is a The extensive network of local lanes, footpaths and traditional feature and practical with a gentle turned bridleways provide amazing walks and cycling routes, staircase to one side and doors leading off to a great ideal for any country/outdoor enthusiasts.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrow Down, Boyneswood Lane, Medstead, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 5DZ
    Merrow Down, Boyneswood Lane, Medstead, Alton, Hampshire, GU34 5DZ Merrow Down, Boyneswood Lane, Medstead, £499,950 Alton, Hampshire, GU34 5DZ Beautifully set in a large garden plot, an older style detached 3/4 bedroom bungalow Outside tucked away in an unmade village lane also with the alternative of planning consent to replace with a new dwelling of about 2,300 sq ft. The outline planning permission Front given by East Hampshire District Council under Notice 29096/001 is for replacement Broad shingle and stone area directly in front of the bungalow with grass border, of the existing dwelling with 2 new dwellings and a new access dated 7th April 2016. laurel and hedge. Rockery at side with border and golden coloured evergreen. The owners are retaining the Westerly plot for their own development and occupation. The existing property is primarily within the Easterly plot and enjoys a Large Southerly Gardens large Southerly facing garden backing onto a paddock and outbuildings. In Affording sweeping green vistas, the garden has a large expanse of lawn occupation by the present owners for some 30 years, the bungalow has several commencing to the Easterly side of the bungalow and extending to the rear. There is higher ceilings, panelled internal doors, double glazing and Superdeal a path and shrubbery border adjoining the sitting room French doors. The new electric/storage heating. Westerly boundary is roughly demarcated by the long concreted path. The rear hedge backs onto a paddock. The rear garden approximately measures 130' depth Merrow Down fronts Boyneswood Lane, a semi-rural unmade lane on the South from the rear of the bungalow with a width of 80' across the rear of the bungalow.
    [Show full text]
  • EHDC Large Development Site Consultation - Objection
    11/12/2019 Mail - Woodgate, Jenny - Outlook EHDC Large Development Site Consultation - Objection Mon 14/10/2019 11:21 To: EHDC - Local Plan <[email protected]>; "victoria.potts\""@easthants.gov.uk <"victoria.potts\""@easthants.gov.uk> Cc: 2 attachments (3 MB) M&FMNP Support documentation.pdf; M&FMNP Submission to EHDC Large Development Site Consultation.pdf; Dear Sirs, Please find the attached submission to the EHDC Large Development Site Consultation from the Medstead & Four Marks Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group. The Steering Group objects to the sites: Four Marks South Land West of Lymington Bottom Road Land South of Winchester Road South Medstead Our reasons are contained in our Submission document and amplified in the supporting documentation. Regards, Secretary, Medstead and Four Marks Neighbourhood Plan https://outlook.office365.com/mail/none/id/AAMkADIxNjE3NWJlLTMxYmEtNDEwZC1iOGM4LTYxOTllYjNmN2MzZQBGAAAAAABrEkrzGtHSSpsf… 1/1 MEDSTEAD AND FOUR MARKS NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN Core Documents To Support Representations from the Steering Group Medstead and Four Marks Neighbourhood Plan October 2019 i This sheet has been intentionally left blank ii Core Documents to Support Representations from the Steering Group Medstead and Four Marks Neighbourhood Plan Contents Page CD 1. Submission from the NPSG to the appeal in the case of Land at Friars Oak Farm, 1 Boyneswood Road, Medstead, Alton. (East Hampshire District Council Reference Number: 25256/045) CD 2. Housing Review. 9 1 Summary. 11 2 Housing in Four Marks and Medstead Ward 11
    [Show full text]
  • THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION for ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW of EAST HAMPSHIRE Draft Recommendations for Ward Boundarie
    SHEET 1, MAP 1 THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF EAST HAMPSHIRE Draft recommendations for ward boundaries in the district of East Hampshire October 2017 Sheet 1 of 1 Boundary alignment and names shown on the mapping background may not be up to date. They may differ from the latest boundary information applied as part of this review. BENTLEY CP This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Keeper of Public Records © Crown copyright and database right. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and database right. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2017. FROYLE CP LASHAM CP SHALDEN CP BENTWORTH & FROYLE C ALTON BINSTED CP HOLYBOURNE B ALTON EASTBROOKE BENTWORTH CP ALTON CP WIELD CP D ALTON WESTBROOKE BINSTED & BENTLEY BEECH CP ALTON ASHDELL KINGSLEY CP A WORLDHAM CP R HEADLEY HEADLEY CP CHAWTON CP WHITEHILL PINEWOOD MEDSTEAD CP FOUR MARKS & MEDSTEAD LINDFORD G R LINDFORD CP A G Y R SH AY O SH T O T TT C FARRINGDON CP WHITEHILL P CHASE P O FOUR MARKS CP SELBORNE CP N WHITEHILL CP BRAMSHOTT & LIPHOOK NEWTON BRAMSHOTT AND VALENCE CP LIPHOOK CP WHITEHILL HOGMOOR & GREATHAM EAST Q TISTED CP ROPLEY CP ROPLEY & TISTED GREATHAM CP COLEMORE AND PRIORS DEAN CP HAWKLEY CP WEST TISTED CP LISS LISS CP FROXFIELD AND PRIVETT CP FROXFIELD & STEEP STEEP CP L P D E L S T SHEET CP IE L T E R F IL M S S H R A F L R E IE L Y T L E ' E S D KEY TO PARISH WARDS P B M K STROUD CP H PETERSFIELD CP ALTON CP PETERSFIELD LANGRISH CP
    [Show full text]