DOCSLIB.ORG

Sgs Qualifor Forest Management Certification Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sgs Qualifor Forest Management Certification Report SGS QUALIFOR Doc. Number: AD 36-A-05 (Associated Document) Doc. Version date: 24 May 2007 Page: 1 of 74 FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT SECTION A: PUBLIC SUMMARY Project Nr: 6092 ZA Client: Komatiland Forests Web Page: www.safcol.co.za Private Bag X11201 Address: Nelspruit, 1200. Country: South Africa SGS-FM/CoC- Certificate Type: Certificate Nr. Forest Management 000068 Date of Issue Date of expiry: SGS Forest Management Standard (AD33) adapted for South Africa version 04 of 29 March Evaluation Standard 2010 Forest Zone: Softwood and Hardwood Plantations Total Certified Area 187 320.31 ha Scope: The management of exotic plantations in the Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-Natal and Limpopo provinces of South Africa, for the production of softwood and hardwood timber products. Location of the FMUs The FMU’s are located in the provinces of Limpopo, Mpumalanga and northern Kwa-Zulu included in the scope Natal. Company Contact Jan Huyser Person: Address: Private Bag X11201, Nelspruit 1200, South Africa. Tel: +27 (0) 83 627 8607 Fax +27 (0) 13 752 6204 Email: [email protected] Evaluation dates: Main Evaluation 6 – 13 June 2007 Re-Assessment COF 26 July 2007 Surveillance 1 6 – 10 October 2008 SGS services are rendered in accordance with the applicable SGS General Conditions of Service accessible at http://www.sgs.com/terms_and_conditions.htm SGS South Africa (Qualifor Programme) 58 Melville Road, Booysens - PO Box 82582, Southdale 2185 -SouthSouth Africa Systems and Services Certification Division Contact Programme Director at t. +27 11 681-2500 [email protected] www.sgs.co m/forestry AD 36-A-05 Page 2 of 74 Surveillance 2 26 – 30 Oct 2009 Surveillance 3 11 – 15 October 2010 Surveillance 4 Copyright: © 2010 SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd All rights reserved AD 36-A-05 Page 3 of 74 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SCOPE OF CERTIFICATE .......................................................................................................................... 5 2. COMPANY BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Ownership ......................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Company Key Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Company History ............................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Organisational Structure .................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Ownership and Use Rights ................................................................................................................................ 13 2.6 Other Land Uses ............................................................................................................................................... 13 2.7 Non-certified Forests ......................................................................................................................................... 14 3. FOREST MANAGEMENT SYSTEM .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1 Bio-physical setting ........................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2 History of use .................................................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Planning process ............................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4 Harvest and regeneration .................................................................................................................................. 16 3.5 Monitoring processes ........................................................................................................................................ 17 4. SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXT ....................................................................... 17 4.1 Social aspects ................................................................................................................................................... 17 4.2 Environmental aspects ...................................................................................................................................... 18 4.3 Administration, Legislation and Guidelines ........................................................................................................ 18 5. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT, HARVESTING, SILVICULTURE AND MONITORING .......................... 21 6. PREPARATION FOR THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................ 22 6.1 Schedule ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.2 Team ................................................................................................................................................................. 22 6.3 Checklist Preparation ........................................................................................................................................ 22 6.4 Stakeholder notification ..................................................................................................................................... 22 7. THE EVALUATION .................................................................................................................................... 22 7.1 Opening meeting ............................................................................................................................................... 22 7.2 Document review ............................................................................................................................................... 23 7.3 Sampling and Evaluation Approach................................................................................................................... 23 7.4 Field assessments ............................................................................................................................................. 23 7.5 Stakeholder interviews ...................................................................................................................................... 23 7.6 Summing up and closing meeting ..................................................................................................................... 24 8. EVALUATION RESULTS ...........................................................................................................................24 8.1 Findings related to the general QUALIFOR Programme ................................................................................... 25 PRINCIPLE 1: Compliance with law and FSC Principles .................................................................................... 25 PRINCIPLE 2: Tenure and use rights and responsibilities .................................................................................. 26 PRINCIPLE 3: Indigenous peoples’ rights ........................................................................................................... 26 PRINCIPLE 4: Community relations and workers rights ..................................................................................... 27 AD 36-A-05 Page 4 of 74 PRINCIPLE 5: Benefits from the forest .............................................................................................................. 29 PRINCIPLE 6: Environmental impact ................................................................................................................. 30 PRINCIPLE 7: Management plan ....................................................................................................................... 33 PRINCIPLE 8: Monitoring and evaluation ........................................................................................................... 35 PRINCIPLE 9: High Conservation Value Forests ................................................................................................ 36 PRINCIPLE 10: Plantations .................................................................................................................................. 37 9. CERTIFICATION DECISION...................................................................................................................... 39 10. MAINTENANCE OF CERTIFICATION ...................................................................................................... 39 11. RECORD OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUESTS (CARs) .................................................................... 42 12. RECORD OF OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................ 50 Observations raised during the last Surveillance of the previous (2nd) Certificate: ........................................................ 59 13. RECORD OF COMPLAINTS ..................................................................................................................... 74 ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS (not part of the Public Summary) AD 20: Evaluation Itinerary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forest Management Certification Report Sgs
    SGS QUALIFOR Doc. Number: AD 36-A-05 (Associated Document) Doc. Version date: 24 May 2007 Page: 1 of 61 FOREST MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION REPORT SECTION A: PUBLIC SUMMARY Project Nr: 7708-ZA York Timbers (Pty) Ltd Client: Web Page: www.york.co.za Address: P/Bag X518, Sabie, 1260 Country: South Africa SGS-FM/COC-000809 Certificate Type: Certificate Nr. Forest Management/Chain of Custody SGS-CW-000809 Date of Issue 03 June 2008 Date of expiry: 02 June 2013 SGS Forest Management Standard (AD33) adapted for South Africa version 04 of 29 March Evaluation Standard 2010 Forest Zone: Temperate Total Certified Area 94 102 ha Scope: Forest Management of exotic plantations of York Timbers (Pty) Ltd in South Africa for the production of FSC-Pure softwood and hardwood timber products, and the purchase, transport and sale of both certified and controlled wood, using the transfer system Location of the FMUs There are two main FMU’s, one located in the Highveld of Mpumalanga in the Jessivale area included in the scope and the other located in the Escarpment (Lowveld) of Mpumalanga where the Head office is also located, in the town of Sabie. Company Contact Dave Malloch Brown Person: Address: P/Bag X518, Sabie, 1260 Tel: (013) 764-9200 / 082 805 5966 Fax (013) 764-3245 / 1027 Email: [email protected] Evaluation dates: Re-Evaluation 14-18 January 2008 Surveillance 1 26-28 November 2008 Surveillance 2 23-25 November 2009; Clearance of Findings Assessment 29-30 March 2010 SGS South Africa (Qualifor Programme) 58 Melville Road, Booysens - PO Box 82582, Southdale 2185 -South Africa Systems and Services Certification Division t +27 11 681681-2500 f +27 11 681-2543 www.sgs.comwww.sgs.com/forestry AD 36-A-05 Page 2 of 61 Surveillance 3 15-18 November 2010; Clearance of Findings Assessment 14-15 February 2011 Surveillance 4 Copyright: © 2010 SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd All rights reserved AD 36-A-05 Page 3 of 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    A REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT FOR THABA CHWEU LOCAL MUNICIPALITY VELDFIRE MANAGEMENT IN MPUMALANGA PROVINCE NKHENSANI DELCY SIWELE 2004061277 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters in Disaster Management In the Disaster Management Training and Education Center for Africa At the UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE Study Leader: Ms. ALICE NCUBE 2011 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The writing of this mini dissertation has been one of the most significant academic challenges I have ever experienced in my academic career. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the All Mighty for giving me the inspiration and strength for the completion of this Master Degree. My deepest gratitude is extended to the following persons who gave me support and guidance during the difficult times of the research study: My supervisor, Ms. Alice Ncube, for being supportive, patient and willing to give me guidance that assisted me to produce good work in completing my dissertation. My mother Mrs. Ethel Siwele and siblings (Rodney, Portia, Eddy and Edwin) for their emotional and financial support. My fiancé Mr. Nkosinathi Nkwinika and my son Ndzalama, for their moral support and enduring all the sleepless nights I spent without them. Mr. Thabang Thinda, for the inputs, advice and guidance provided throughout and towards the completion of the dissertation. Mr Sakkie Van Der Merwe, Thaba Chweu Local Municipality: Chief Fire Officer. I thank you for allowing me the opportunity to conduct the research study in the municipality. Mr. John Masina, Thaba Chweu Local Municipality: Fire and Rescue Officer, I would like to thank you and the fire crew for welcoming and for accommodating me during their fire season preparations and providing me with all the necessary information.
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo Mpumalanga
    ZIMBABWE Camp Gate & Entry Gate Timetable Limpopo OPEN Mabyeni 18 H1-9 MAY- AUG- NOV- R525 Pafuri JANFEB MAR APR JUL OCT DEC Gate Picnic Site SEPT The Outpost 04:30 5:30 5:30 6:006:00 6:00 5:30 4:30 Lodge 21 Luvuvhu Pafuri Crooks Pafuri CLOSE Camp Corner Gate Matshitshinzudzi MAY- NOV- H1-8 JANFEB MAR APR AUG SEPT OCT DEC 18:30 18:30 18:00 18:00 17:30 18:00 18:00 18:30 Baobab 25 MOZAMBIQUE ENTRY GATES OPEN : JAN 5:30 NOV-DEC 5:30 PARK REGULATIONS Matekevele Speed Limit: Tarred rds-50 kph; Gravel rds 40 kph Viewpoint Only leave car at selected viewpoints Punda Stay on road and do not feed animals 25 Maria 16 Restcamp S60 H1-8 CAMP REGULATIONS Luvuvhu S99 H1-3 S59 11 There may be no noise from 21:30 & 06:00 No roller-skating, skateboarding & cycling Punda H13-1 No trading or advertising is permitted Maria Speed limit within rest camp is 10 km/h Gate 20S58 No pets allowed & fire arms must be declared Dzundwini R524 Viewpoint H1-7 21 Sandveld Communities Shitangeni Babalala Mphongolo Mopane Savannah Picnic Site Kruger Sirheni Bushveld Mopane Shrub Veld Camp S56 National Mopane/Bushwillow Woodlands 11Early Borehole Lebombo Mountain Bushveld Mooigesig Park Dam Olifants Rugged Veld Wik-'n-Weeg 7 Stunted Knob Thorn Savannah Dam S55 S135 Knob Thorn/Maroela Veld on Basalt Viewpoint Shingwedzi Restcamp H1-6 Delagoa Thorn Thicket 28 S134 Shingwedzi Bububu S52 S50 Mixed Bushwillow Woodlands S52 8 Bateleur 8 Sabie/Crocodile Thorn Thicket Bushveld Camp Pretorious Kop Sourveld/ Viewpoint Rooibosrand Krapkuil S144 Malelane Mountain Bushveld Dam Dam 14
    [Show full text]
  • Panorama Map 2020 Mpumalanga
    Panorama Portfolio Map Mariepskop 1944m Blyderivierspoort Dam Blydepoort Trails (2 to 5km) The Resort has 3 well laid out walks The Blyderivierpoort Dam was completed in 1974 in order to stabilize the water between 2 and 5km. These are the supply to the irrigators of the Blyde River Irrigation district and to provide additional Kadishi, Leopard and Guinea Fowl trails. water for the mining and industry at Phalaborwa. Drakensberg R532 Blyde Canyon, Mountains A Forever Resort View point of Three Rondawels The Three Rondavels resembles thatched huts. The Pedi Tribe named the three hills Road via the after three wives of the Pulana Tribe Chief, Maripi Mashile who conquered the Swazi Abel Erasmus Tribe. The tall peak behind them was called Mapjareng, also named after Maripi; meaning Pass to Hoedspruit Copy Right © 2020 Gerhard Brummer ‘The Chief’. +27 (0)72 664 3937 www.hoedspruit.net No part of this map shall be copied in any way or means without the permission of the copy right holder. Your Professional BOOKING GUIDE Lowveld View to Stunning views of the Lowveld beyond, Airlink connects you to Hoedspruit with direct N * Safaris flights from Johannesburg and Cape Town. Blyde River Canyon and the Blyde Dam. * Adventure Airlink connects you Skukuza Airport with direct * Accommodation flights from Johannesburg, Nelspruit & Cape Town. and Maps Airlink connects you to Nelspruit KMIA with direct flights from Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban, www.krugertocape.co.za Skukuza and Livingstone. W E Airlink links you to various Bush Lodge destinations. Blyde River Canyon POWERED BY www.flyairlink.com S Nature Reserve Drie Susters 1704m Scotland Hill The Potholes was named after Bernard Thomas 1736m Bourke, known as Tom, together with his brother Old Belvedere Hydro owned the company Bourke & Co., which fitted Electric Power Station out prospecting parties and other general dealings, such as buying property.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality and Algal Assemblages of the Sabie River and Tributaries, Including the Inyaka Dam, in Relation to Land Use Practices
    Water Quality and Algal Assemblages of the Sabie River and Tributaries, Including the Inyaka Dam, in Relation to Land Use Practices Report to the WATER RESEARCH COMMISSION by S BARNARD, TL MORGENTHAL, M STOLZ, A VENTER AND A ERASMUS North-West University WRC Report No. 2755/1/19 ISBN 978-0-6392-0091-0 October 2019 Obtainable from Water Research Commission Private Bag X03 GEZINA, 0031 [email protected] or download from www.wrc.org.za DISCLAIMER This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. © Water Research Commission ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Aquatic ecosystems across the world are under pressure due to the increasing demand for water. This increase in demand is linked to a growth in urbanization, and industrial and agricultural development. These trends are also visible in South Africa where the river systems are furthermore stressed by the dry climatic conditions. The deterioration of river water quality due to unsustainable anthropogenic activities is currently an important environmental concern worldwide. Deforestation, agricultural activities and urbanization modify land surfaces which can alter runoff volume, generate pollution and can increase algal production. The Sabie River catchment forms part of the bigger Inkomati-Usuthu Water Management Area (IUWMA) under the management of the Inkomati Usuthu Catchment Management Agency (IUCMA) in Mpumalanga Province. It covers about 6 320 square kilometres. The headwaters of the Sabie River and its tributaries such as the Sand River and Marite River arise from the upper Drakensberg escarpment, flowing eastwards into the Lowveld through changing topography, through the Kruger National Park (KNP) into Mozambique where it becomes part of the Incomati Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT for the CONSTRUCTION of a 132Kv DISTRIBUTION POWER LINE BETWEEN LYDENBURG to MERENSKY SUBSTATIONS
    DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE CO NSTRUCTION OF A 132kV DISTRIBUTION POWER LINE BETWEEN LYDENBU RG TO MERENSKY SUBSTATIONS: MPUMALANGA AND LIMPOPO PROVINCES. A REPORT FOR: ESKOM HOLDINGS SOC D A T E : JANUARY 2016 1 DRAFT BASIC ASSESSMENT REPORT (For official use only) File Reference Number: Application Number: Date Received: Basic assessment report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014, promulgated in terms of the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act No. 107 of 1998), as amended. Kindly note that: 1. This basic assessment report is a standard report that may be required by a competent authority in terms of the EIA Regulations, 2014 and is meant to streamline applications. Please make sure that it is the report used by the particular competent authority for the activity that is being applied for. 2. This report format is current as of 08 December 2014 . It is the responsibility of the applicant to ascertain whether subsequent versions of the form have been published or produced by the competent authority 3. The report must be typed within the spaces provided in the form. The size of the spaces provided is not necessarily indicative of the amount of information to be provided. The report is in the form of a table that can extend itself as each space is filled with typing. 4. Where applicable tick the boxes that are applicable in the report. 5. An incomplete report may be returned to the applicant for revision. 6. The use of “not applicable” in the report must be done with circumspection because if it is used in respect of material information that is required by the competent authority for assessing the application, it may result in the rejection of the application as provided for in the regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of South African Place Names
    DICTIONARY OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PLACE NAMES P E Raper Head, Onomastic Research Centre, HSRC CONTENTS Preface Abbreviations ix Introduction 1. Standardization of place names 1.1 Background 1.2 International standardization 1.3 National standardization 1.3.1 The National Place Names Committee 1.3.2 Principles and guidelines 1.3.2.1 General suggestions 1.3.2.2 Spelling and form A Afrikaans place names B Dutch place names C English place names D Dual forms E Khoekhoen place names F Place names from African languages 2. Structure of place names 3. Meanings of place names 3.1 Conceptual, descriptive or lexical meaning 3.2 Grammatical meaning 3.3 Connotative or pragmatic meaning 4. Reference of place names 5. Syntax of place names Dictionary Place Names Bibliography PREFACE Onomastics, or the study of names, has of late been enjoying a greater measure of attention all over the world. Nearly fifty years ago the International Committee of Onomastic Sciences (ICOS) came into being. This body has held fifteen triennial international congresses to date, the most recent being in Leipzig in 1984. With its headquarters in Louvain, Belgium, it publishes a bibliographical and information periodical, Onoma, an indispensable aid to researchers. Since 1967 the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN) has provided for co-ordination and liaison between countries to further the standardization of geographical names. To date eleven working sessions and four international conferences have been held. In most countries of the world there are institutes and centres for onomastic research, official bodies for the national standardization of place names, and names societies.
    [Show full text]
  • My Trip to South Africa (And Swaziland)
    My Trip to South Africa (and Swaziland) I first became aware of the term ‘apartheid’ after watching an episode of Saturday Night Live. It was December 13, 1975, and I was only fifteen years old. SNL was in its infancy back then, quite controversial, appealing to my teenage angst by skewering contemporary politics and culture. I loved it (and still do). On that particular night the guest host was comedian Richard Pryor. The skits were hilarious. But what I remembered most was the song ‘Johannesburg’ performed live by Gil Scott-Heron, the episode’s musical guest. The song was a protest piece in support of the struggles against apartheid, something I knew nothing about. As Gil Scott-Heron belted out his question – “What’s the word? Tell me, brother, have you heard, from Johannesburg?” – over and over again, his voice rising in an angry crescendo, I became enthralled. Suddenly, I, too, wanted to know what was going on in Johannesburg. In those pre-Internet days, though, one needed to go to the library to get information. And what I discovered was disturbing, indeed. Apartheid was the name given to an institutionalized system of racial segregation and discrimination created by the former ruling white National Party of South Africa, starting – ‘officially’, anyway – in 1948 for the purpose of maintaining their grip on power. Blacks and Coloreds (multiracial ethnic groups) were forced to live in separate neighborhoods with virtually no political or legal recourses. By the mid-seventies, the social and economic disparity between the South African races became so shockingly clear the National Party government became a pariah in the eyes of the free world.
    [Show full text]
  • HIA Thornybush
    SPECIALIST REPORT PHASE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL / HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF TRIREACH LODGE AND STAFF HOUSING on PORTION 262 OF THE FARM GUERNSEY 81KU, LIMPOPO PROVINCE REPORT PREPARED FOR EMROSS Consulting: Mr. A. Emery / [email protected] Cell: 0824678868 JUNE 2020 ADANSONIA HERITAGE CONSULTANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN PROFESSIONAL ARCHAEOLOGISTS REGISTERED WITH SAHRA C. VAN WYK ROWE E-MAIL: [email protected] Tel: 0828719553 / Fax: 0867151639 P.O. BOX 75, PILGRIM'S REST, 1290 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Phase 1 Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) regarding archaeological and other cultural heritage resources was conducted on the footprint for staff housing and six lodge units, main building, a gym and associated infrastructure on portion 262 of the farm Guernsey 81KU, near Hoedspruit, Limpopo Province. The farm was previously used for cultivation and cattle farming and has now been included within the boundary of the Thornybush Nature Reserve. The National Heritage Resources Act, no 25 (1999)(NHRA), protects all heritage resources, which are classified as national estate. The NHRA stipulates that any person who intends to undertake a development, is subjected to the provisions of the Act. The footprint of the two sections were easily accessible. The section selected for the staff housing was dry, flat and open, where visibility was excellent. The lodge units are situated on either side of the non- perennial tributary to the Klaserie River, with riparian vegetation present. This section was slightly denser, but also dry and open and visibility was good. The section is zoned as agricultural and will be rezoned to conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • GCRO Qol Survey II List of Places with Codes
    GCRO QoL Survey II List of Places with Codes Table of Contents Question List Page No. 2.4 List of Places (Other than Gauteng) Free State 2 Eastern Cape 3 Kwazulu Natal 6 Mpumalanga 9 Northern Cape 11 Limpopo 13 North West 15 Western Cape 16 2.8 and List of Places (Within Gauteng) 20 4.2 4.2 List of Places (Outside Gauteng within GCRO) 49 2.8 and Municipality Codes 50 4.2 Page | 2 List of Places (Other than Gauteng) Required for Question 2.4 FREE STATE PROVINCE Town GCROCode Town GCROCode Town GCROCode Aberfeldy 20706 Fauresmith 20598 Lindley 20699 Allandale 20641 Ferreira 20634 Lofter 20607 Allanridge 20666 Ficksburg 20689 Luckhoff 20593 Allep 20612 Florisbad 20658 Manyatseng 20649 Alma 20676 Fouriesburg 20697 Maokeng 20147 Arlington 20702 Frankfort 20725 Marquard 20685 Austin's Post 20597 Gariep Dam 20609 Maselspoort 20632 Bethlehem 20691 Geneva 20717 Meadows 20624 Bethulie 20611 Glen 20630 Meloding 20679 Bloemfontein 20631 Glenrock 20645 Memel 20710 Bloudrif 20669 Goedemoed 20617 Mirage 20682 Boesmanskop 20619 Gomvlei 20614 Mount Pelaan 20712 Bohlokong 20690 Gumtree 20688 Namahadi 20730 Boshof 20661 Harrismith 20704 Odendaalsrus 20667 Bothaville 20683 Heilbron 20149 Oppermans 20590 Botshabelo 20636 Helvetia 20618 Oranjeville 20160 Brandfort 20655 Hennenman 20675 Parys 20151 Breipaal 20615 Hertzogville 20660 Paul Roux 20695 Bronville 20678 Heuningspruit 20155 Petrus Steyn 20700 Bultfontein 20665 Hobhouse 20648 Petrusburg 20594 Clarens 20694 Hoopstad 20664 Philippolis 20605 Clocolan 20687 Jacobsdal 20589 Philippolis Road 20604 Clydesdale
    [Show full text]
  • Limpopo Mpumalanga
    ZIMBABWE Camp Gate & Entry Gate Timetable Limpopo OPEN Mabyeni 18 H1-9 MAY- AUG- NOV- R525 Pafuri JAN FEB MAR APR OCT Gate Picnic Site JUL SEPT DEC The Outpost 04:30 5:30 5:30 6:00 6:00 6:00 5:30 4:30 Lodge 21 Luvuvhu Pafuri Crooks Pafuri CLOSE Camp Corner Gate Matshitshinzudzi MAY- NOV- H1-8 JAN FEB MAR APR AUG SEPT OCT DEC 18:30 18:30 18:00 18:00 17:30 18:00 18:00 18:30 Baobab 25 MOZAMBIQUE ENTRY GATES OPEN : JAN 5:30 NOV-DEC 5:30 PARK REGULATIONS Matekevele Speed Limit: Tarred rds-50 kph; Gravel rds 40 kph Viewpoint Only leave car at selected viewpoints Punda Stay on road and do not feed animals 25 Maria 16 Restcamp S60 H1-8 CAMP REGULATIONS Luvuvhu S99 H1-3 S59 11 There may be no noise from 21:30 & 06:00 No roller-skating, skateboarding & cycling Punda H13-1 No trading or advertising is permitted Maria Speed limit within rest camp is 10 km/h Gate 20S58 No pets allowed & fire arms must be declared Dzundwini R524 Viewpoint H1-7 21 Sandveld Communities Shitangeni Babalala Mphongolo Mopane Savannah Sirheni Picnic Site Kruger Bushveld Mopane Shrub Veld CampS56 Mopane/Bushwillow Woodlands National 11Early Borehole Lebombo Mountain Bushveld Mooigesig Park Dam Olifants Rugged Veld Wik-'n-Weeg 7 Stunted Knob Thorn Savannah Dam S55 S135 Knob Thorn/Maroela Veld on Basalt Viewpoint Shingwedzi Restcamp H1-6 S134 Delagoa Thorn Thicket 28 S50 Shingwedzi Bububu S52 Mixed Bushwillow Woodlands S52 8 Bateleur 8 Sabie/Crocodile Thorn Thicket Bushveld Camp Viewpoint Pretorious Kop Sourveld/ Rooibosrand Krapkuil S144 Malelane Mountain Bushveld Dam Dam
    [Show full text]
  • A Synoptic Review of the African Genus Hesperantha (Iridaceae: Crocoideae)
    A SYNOPTIC REVIEW OF Peter Goldblatt2 THE AFRICAN GENUS HESPERANTHA (IRIDACEAE: CROCOIDEAE)1 ABSTRACT Although revised in the past 20 years for the two major centers of its range, the southern African winter-rainfall zone and the eastern southern African Drakensberg, the sub-Saharan African genus Hesperantha remains inadequately understood. Continuing botanical exploration in southern Africa has resulted in the discovery of several new species and of populations of species known only from the type or very few collections. Species are listed here in a revised taxonomic order together with keys for the genus in the southern African winter-rainfall zone and in eastern southern Africa and tropical Africa that have a summer-rainfall climate. Included here are 11 new species, a shift in the application of the name H. candida to plants called H. vernalis, recognition of H. leucantha for plants previously called H. candida, and a series of novel observations relating to species delimitation, biology, geography, and taxonomy. Important range extensions are also noted for poorly known species, among them H. ciliolata, H. ¯ava, H. quadrangula, and H. teretifolia. Including the novelties described in this account, 79 species of Hesperantha are now recognized, 4 in tropical Africa, 37 in summer-rainfall southern Africa, mostly of the Drakensberg, and 42 in winter-rainfall southern Africa. Hesperantha longicollis and H. coccinea are shared between tropical and eastern southern Africa, and H. radiata and H. bachmannii between the winter- and summer-rainfall zones of southern Africa. The new species from the southern African winter-rainfall zone are: H. decipiens, from Namaqualand, allied to H.
    [Show full text]