Climate Change Impacts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Climate Change Impacts CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS Josh Pederson / SIMoN NOAA Matt Wilson/Jay Clark, NOAA NMFS AFSC NMFSNMFS Southwest Southwest Fisheries Fisheries Science Science Center Center GULF OF THE FARALLONES AND CORDELL BANK NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES Report of a Joint Working Group of the Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries Advisory Councils Editors John Largier, Brian Cheng, and Kelley Higgason June 2010 Working Group Members Sarah Allen, Point Reyes National Seashore Bob Breen, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Jenifer Dugan, Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara Brian Gaylord, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Edwin Grosholz, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Daphne Hatch, Golden Gate National Recreation Area Tessa Hill, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Jaime Jahncke, PRBO Conservation Science; CBNMS Advisory Council Judith Kildow, Ocean Economics Program Raphael Kudela, University of California, Santa Cruz John Largier (Chair), UC Davis; Bodega Marine Lab; GFNMS Advisory Council Lance Morgan, Marine Conservation Biology Institute; CBNMS Advisory Council David Revell, Philip Williams and Associates David Reynolds, National Weather Service Frank Schwing, National Marine Fisheries Service William Sydeman, Farallon Institute John Takekawa, United States Geological Survey Staff to the Working Group Brian Cheng, Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank national marine sanctuaries; UC Davis Kelley Higgason, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Sanctuary Superintendents Maria Brown, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Dan Howard, Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary Acknowledgements The editors would like to thank the Influential Scientific Information (ISI) Reviewers who donated their time and expertise as peer reviewers of this document: Sam Johnson, United States Geological Survey Adam Parris, Bay Conservation and Development Commission Curt Storlazzi, United States Geological Survey Adrienne Sutton, Oregon State University, PISCO The editors would also like to thank NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries for providing funding support toward the coordination of this document, and all of the agencies, organizations, and institutions involved that provided numerous in-kind staff hours toward the completion of this document. i Contributors Josh Adams, United States Geological Survey Sarah Allen, Point Reyes National Seashore Dane Behrens, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Steven Bograd, National Marine Fisheries Service Russell Bradley, PRBO Conservation Science Bob Breen, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Brian Cheng, Gulf of the Farallones and Cordell Bank national marine sanctuaries; UC Davis James Cloern, United States Geological Survey Jeffrey Dorman, University of California, Berkeley Jenifer Dugan, Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara Meredith Elliot, PRBO Conservation Science Marisol Garcia-Reyes, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Brian Gaylord, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Mike Graham, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Edwin Grosholz, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Daphne Hatch, Golden Gate National Recreation Area Annaliese Hettinger, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Kelley Higgason, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Tessa Hill, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Julie Howar, PRBO Conservation Science Jaime Jahncke, PRBO Conservation Science; CBNMS Advisory Council Heather Kerkering, Central and Northern California Ocean Observing System Judith Kildow, Ocean Economics Program Raphael Kudela, University of California, Santa Cruz John Largier, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab; GFNMS Advisory Council Lance Morgan, Marine Conservation Biology Institute; CBNMS Advisory Council Kerry Nickols, University of California, Davis; Bodega Marine Lab Tim Reed, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary David Revell, Philip Williams and Associates Karen Reyna, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary David Reynolds, National Weather Service Jan Roletto, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Jennifer Roth, PRBO Conservation Science Mary Jane Schramm, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Frank Schwing, National Marine Fisheries Service William Sydeman, Farallon Institute John Takekawa, United States Geological Survey Sage Tezak, Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary Pete Warzybok, PRBO Conservation Science ii Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction................................................................................................................................. 8 2. Background............................................................................................................................... 10 3. Physical Effects of Climate Change ......................................................................................... 13 3.1 Atmosphere......................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Wind............................................................................................................................. 15 3.1.2 Storms .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.3 Clouds .......................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Precipitation and Land Runoff............................................................................................ 17 3.3 Ocean Currents and Waves................................................................................................. 19 3.3.1 Ocean Circulation ........................................................................................................ 20 3.3.2 Waves........................................................................................................................... 21 3.3.3 Coastal Upwelling........................................................................................................ 23 3.3.4 Estuarine Circulation ................................................................................................... 25 3.4 Sea Level Rise..................................................................................................................... 27 3.5 Coastal Erosion ................................................................................................................... 32 3.6 Ocean Water Properties ...................................................................................................... 34 3.6.1 Temperature ................................................................................................................. 34 3.6.2 Ocean Acidification ..................................................................................................... 37 3.6.3 Salinity ......................................................................................................................... 40 3.6.4 Nutrients....................................................................................................................... 40 3.6.5 Dissolved Oxygen........................................................................................................ 41 4. Responses in Biological Processes ........................................................................................... 43 4.1 Physiology .......................................................................................................................... 43 4.2 Range Shifts........................................................................................................................ 45 4.3 Phenology ........................................................................................................................... 47 4.4 Population Connectivity...................................................................................................... 48 4.5 Evolutionary Response ....................................................................................................... 49 5. Responses in Marine Organisms............................................................................................... 50 5.1 Plankton .............................................................................................................................. 50 5.2 Macroalgae and Plants ........................................................................................................ 53 5.3 Invertebrates........................................................................................................................ 55 5.4 Fish...................................................................................................................................... 57 5.5 Seabirds............................................................................................................................... 59 5.6 Marine Mammals................................................................................................................ 60 6. Responses in Marine Habitats..................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY of the UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This Page Intentionally Left Blank the Environmental Legacy of the Uc Natural Reserve System
    THE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGACY OF THE UC NATURAL RESERVE SYSTEM This page intentionally left blank the environmental legacy of the uc natural reserve system edited by peggy l. fiedler, susan gee rumsey, and kathleen m. wong university of california press Berkeley Los Angeles London The publisher gratefully acknowledges the generous contri- bution to this book provided by the University of California Natural Reserve System. University of California Press, one of the most distinguished university presses in the United States, enriches lives around the world by advancing scholarship in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences. Its activities are supported by the UC Press Foundation and by philanthropic contributions from individuals and institutions. For more information, visit www.ucpress.edu. University of California Press Berkeley and Los Angeles, California University of California Press, Ltd. London, England © 2013 by The Regents of the University of California Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The environmental legacy of the UC natural reserve system / edited by Peggy L. Fiedler, Susan Gee Rumsey, and Kathleen M. Wong. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-520-27200-2 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Natural areas—California. 2. University of California Natural Reserve System—History. 3. University of California (System)—Faculty. 4. Environmental protection—California. 5. Ecology—Study and teaching— California. 6. Natural history—Study and teaching—California. I. Fiedler, Peggy Lee. II. Rumsey, Susan Gee. III. Wong, Kathleen M. (Kathleen Michelle) QH76.5.C2E59 2013 333.73'1609794—dc23 2012014651 Manufactured in China 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R 2002) (Permanence of Paper).
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorology and Climate
    Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2667 2007 ECOSYSTEM OVERVIEW: PACIFIC NORTH COAST INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT AREA (PNCIMA) APPENDIX B: METEOROLOGY AND CLIMATE Authors: William Crawford1, Duncan Johannessen2, Rick Birch3, Keith Borg3, and David Fissel3 Edited by: B.G. Lucas, S. Verrin, and R. Brown 1 Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, BC V8L 4B2 2 Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of Victoria, PO Box 3055 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6 3 ASL Environmental Sciences, 1986 Mills Road, Sidney, BC V8L 5Y3 © Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, 2007. Cat. No. Fs 97-6/2667E ISSN 0706-6457 Correct citation for this publication: Crawford, W., Johannessen, D., Birch, R., Borg, K., and Fissel, D. 2007. Appendix B: Meteorology and climate. In Ecosystem overview: Pacific North Coast Integrated Management Area (PNCIMA). Edited by Lucas, B.G., Verrin, S., and Brown, R. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2667: iv + 18 p. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 KEY POINTS ................................................................................................................................1 1.2 UNCERTAINTIES, LIMITATIONS, AND VARIABILITY .....................................................................2 1.3 MAJOR SOURCES OF INFORMATION OR DATA .............................................................................2 1.4 IDENTIFIED KNOWLEDGE AND DATA GAPS .................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Status of California Monarchs
    The Legal Status of Monarch Butterflies in California International Environmental Law Project 2012 IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status The International Environmental Law Project (IELP) is a legal clinic at Lewis & Clark Law School that works to develop, implement, and enforce international environmental law. It works on a range of issues, including wildlife conservation, climate change, and issues relating to trade and the environment. This report was written by the following people from the Lewis & Clark Law School: Jennifer Amiott, Mikio Hisamatsu, Erica Lyman, Steve Moe, Toby McCartt, Jen Smith, Emily Stein, and Chris Wold. Biological information was reviewed by the following individuals from The Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation: Carly Voight, Sarina Jepsen, and Scott Hoffman Black. This report was funded by the Monarch Joint Venture and the Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. For more information, contact: Chris Wold Associate Professor of Law & Director International Environmental Law Project Lewis & Clark Law School 10015 SW Terwilliger Blvd Portland, OR 97219 USA TEL +1-503-768-6734 FX +1-503-768-6671 E-mail: [email protected] Web: law.lclark.edu/org/ielp Copyright © 2012 International Environmental Law Project and the Xerces Society Photo of overwintering monarchs (Danaus plexippus) clustering on a coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) on front cover by Carly Voight, The Xerces Society. IELP Report on Monarch Legal Status Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................v I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................1 II. Regulatory Authority of the California Department of Fish and Game ..............................5 III. Protection for Monarchs in California State Parks and on Other State Lands .....................6 A. Management of California State Parks ....................................................................6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration S
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures 2000 Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration S. L. Thornton Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists Richard E. Dodge Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] David S. Gilliam Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] R. DeVictor Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists P. Cooke Hazen and Sawyer, Environmental Engineers and Scientists Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation Thornton, S. L.; Dodge, Richard E.; Gilliam, David S.; DeVictor, R.; and Cooke, P., "Success and Growth of Corals Transplanted to Cement Armor Mat Tiles in Southeast Florida: Implications for Reef Restoration" (2000). Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures. 39. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facpresentations/39 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Proceedings, Presentations, Speeches, Lectures by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Proceedings 9" International Coral Reef Symposium, Bali, Indonesia 23-27 October 2000, Vol.2 Success and growth of corals transplanted to cement armor mat tiles in southeast Florida: implications for reef restoration ' S.L. Thornton, R.E. Dodge t , D.S. Gilliam , R. DeVictor and P. Cooke ABSTRACT In 1997, 271 scleractinian corals growing on a sewer outfall pipe were used in a transplantation study offshore from North Dade County, Florida, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather Numbers Multiple Choices I
    Weather Numbers Answer Bank A. 1 B. 2 C. 3 D. 4 E. 5 F. 25 G. 35 H. 36 I. 40 J. 46 K. 54 L. 58 M. 72 N. 74 O. 75 P. 80 Q. 100 R. 910 S. 1000 T. 1010 U. 1013 V. ½ W. ¾ 1. Minimum wind speed for a hurricane in mph N 74 mph 2. Flash-to-bang ratio. For every 10 second between lightning flash and thunder, the storm is this many miles away B 2 miles as flash to bang ratio is 5 seconds per mile 3. Minimum diameter of a hailstone in a severe storm (in inches) A 1 inch (formerly ¾ inches) 4. Standard sea level pressure in millibars U 1013.25 millibars 5. Minimum wind speed for a severe storm in mph L 58 mph 6. Minimum wind speed for a blizzard in mph G 35 mph 7. 22 degrees Celsius converted to Fahrenheit M 72 22 x 9/5 + 32 8. Increments between isobars in millibars D 4mb 9. Minimum water temperature in Fahrenheit for hurricane development P 80 F 10. Station model reports pressure as 100, what is the actual pressure in millibars T 1010 (remember to move decimal to left and then add either 10 or 9 100 become 10.0 910.0mb would be extreme low so logic would tell you it would be 1010.0mb) Multiple Choices I 1. A dry line front is also known as a: a. dew point front b. squall line front c. trough front d. Lemon front e. Kelvin front 2.
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Capstone Papers
    UC San Diego Capstone Papers Title Developing a Draft Management Plan for the Dike Rock Intertidal Area Scripps Coastal Reserve, La Jolla, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4c57b1bc Author Som, Marina Publication Date 2015-04-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California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
    [Show full text]
  • Jenner Visitor Center Sonoma Coast State Beach Docent Manual
    CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Jenner Visitor Center Sonoma Coast State Beach Docent Manual Developed by Stewards of the Coast & Redwoods Russian River District State Park Interpretive Association Jenner Visitor Center Docent Program California State Parks/Russian River District 25381 Steelhead Blvd, PO Box 123, Duncans Mills, CA 95430 (707) 865-2391, (707) 865-2046 (FAX) Stewards of the Coast and Redwoods (Stewards) PO Box 2, Duncans Mills, CA 95430 (707) 869-9177, (707) 869-8252 (FAX) [email protected], www.stewardsofthecoastandredwoods.org Stewards Executive Director Michele Luna Programs Manager Sukey Robb-Wilder State Park VIP Coordinator Mike Wisehart State Park Cooperating Association Liaison Greg Probst Sonoma Coast State Park Staff: Supervising Rangers Damien Jones Jeremy Stinson Supervising Lifeguard Tim Murphy Rangers Ben Vanden Heuvel Lexi Jones Trish Nealy Cover & Design Elements: Chris Lods Funding for this program is provided by the Fisherman’s Festival Allocation Committee, Copyright © 2004 Stewards of the Coast and Redwoods Acknowledgement page updated February 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 1 Part I The California State Park System and Volunteers The California State Park System 4 State Park Rules and Regulations 5 Role and Function of Volunteers in the State Park System 8 Volunteerism Defined 8 Volunteer Standards 9 Interpretive Principles 11 Part II Russian River District State Park Information Quick Reference to Neighboring Parks 13 Sonoma Coast State Beach Information 14 Sonoma Coast Beach Safety 17 Tide Pooling
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Aquatic Species in California Open Coastal Waters -2007
    INTRODUCED AQUATIC SPECIES IN CALIFORNIA OPEN COASTAL WATERS -2007 Final Report September 2008 California Department of Fish and Game Office of Spill Prevention and Response Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory 1 AUTHORS Erin R. Maloney, Russell Fairey, Ashleigh Lyman, Zea Walton, Marco Sigala Moss Landing Marine Laboratories/Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory This report should be cited as: Maloney, E., Fairey, R., Lyman, A., Walton, Z., Sigala, M. 2007. Introduced Aquatic Species in California’s Open Coastal Waters - 2007. Final Report. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA., 84 pp. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was completed thanks to the efforts of the following individuals: California Department of Fish and Game: Project Management and Reporting Steve Foss, Michael Sowby, Peter Ode San Jose State University Foundation- Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Marine Pollution Studies Laboratory: Project oversight, field sampling, literature review and data analysis: Russell Fairey, Erin Maloney, Ashleigh Lyman, Mark Pranger, Marco Sigala, Cassandra Lamerdin, Zea Walton, Paul Tompkins, Kim Quaranta, Aurora Alifano, Selena McMillan, Jon Walsh, Jason Felton, Lewis Barnett, Vince Christian. Marine Benthic Ecology Laboratory: Project oversight, training, sample transfer, sorting and gross taxonomy, data entry: Aurora Alifano, Stepheni Ceperley, Cori Gibble, Kamille Hammerstrom, Andy Hansen, Scott Hansen, Brian Hoover, Erin Jensen, Jim Oakden, John Oliver, Sierra Perry, Jasmine Ruvalcaba, Jared
    [Show full text]
  • Northwesterly Surface Winds Over the Eastern North Pacific Ocean in Spring and Summer
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Northerly surface wind events over the eastern North Pacific Ocean : spatial distribution, seasonality, atmospheric circulation, and forcing Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62x1f76v Author Taylor, Stephen V. Publication Date 2006 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Northerly surface wind events over the eastern North Pacific Ocean: Spatial distribution, seasonality, atmospheric circulation, and forcing A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Oceanography by Stephen V. Taylor Committee in charge: Professor Konstantine Georgakakos, Chair Professor Daniel Cayan, Co-Chair Professor Scott Ashford Professor Walter Munk Professor Joel Norris 2006 Copyright Stephen V. Taylor, 2006 All rights reserved. SIGNATURE PAGE The Dissertation of Stephen V. Taylor is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ Co-Chair ___________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2006 iii DEDICATION To all who maintain the interest and exert the effort to learn iv TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary
    Proposed Wisconsin – Lake Michigan National Marine Sanctuary Draft Environmental Impact Statement and Draft Management Plan DECEMBER 2016 | sanctuaries.noaa.gov/wisconsin/ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) U.S. Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and NOAA Administrator Kathryn D. Sullivan, Ph.D. Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management National Ocean Service W. Russell Callender, Ph.D. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries John Armor, Director Matt Brookhart, Acting Deputy Director Cover Photos: Top: The schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Tamara Thomsen, Wisconsin Historical Society. Bottom: Photomosaic of the schooner Walter B. Allen. Credit: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution - Advanced Imaging and Visualization Laboratory. 1 Abstract In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA, 16 U.S.C. 1434 et seq.), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that considers alternatives for the proposed designation of Wisconsin - Lake Michigan as a National Marine Sanctuary. The proposed action addresses NOAA’s responsibilities under the NMSA to identify, designate, and protect areas of the marine and Great Lakes environment with special national significance due to their conservation, recreational, ecological, historical, scientific, cultural, archaeological, educational, or aesthetic qualities as national marine sanctuaries. ONMS has developed five alternatives for the designation, and the DEIS evaluates the environmental consequences of each under NEPA. The DEIS also serves as a resource assessment under the NMSA, documenting present and potential uses of the areas considered in the alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • J16.1 Preliminary Assessment of Ascat Ocean Surface Vector Wind (Osvw) Retrievals at Noaa Ocean Prediction Center
    J16.1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF ASCAT OCEAN SURFACE VECTOR WIND (OSVW) RETRIEVALS AT NOAA OCEAN PREDICTION CENTER Khalil. A. Ahmad* PSGS/NOAA/NESDIS/StAR, Camp Springs, MD Joseph Sienkiewicz NOAA/NWS/NCEP/OPC, Camp Springs, MD Zorana Jelenak, and Paul Chang NOAA/NESDIS/StAR, Camp Springs, MD 1. INTRODUCTION The National Oceanic and Atmospheric The SeaWinds scatterometer onboard Administration (NOAA) Ocean Prediction Center QuikSCAT satellite was launched into space by (OPC) is responsible for issuing marine weather the National Aeronautics and Space forecasts, wind warnings, and guidance in text and Administration (NASA) in June 1999. The graphical format for maritime users operating over SeaWinds scatterometer (henceforth, referred to the North Atlantic and North Pacific high seas, and as QuikSCAT) is a conical scanning, pencil beam the offshore waters of the continental United radar operating at a Ku-band microwave States. The OPC area of responsibility (AOR) frequency of 13.4 GHz that collects the extends from subtropics to arctic from 35° West to electromagnetic backscatter return from the wind 160° East. These waters include the busy trade roughened ocean surface at multiple antenna look routes between North America and both Europe angles to estimates the magnitude and direction of and Asia, the fishing grounds of Bering Sea, and the oceanic wind vector (Hoffman and Leidner, the cruising routes to Bermuda and Hawaii. 2005). The OSVW data derived from QuikSCAT has a nominal resolution of 25 km, and post The marine warnings issued by OPC are based processing techniques have resulted in a finer upon the Beaufort wind speed scale, and fall into resolution of 12.5 km.
    [Show full text]