Assessment of Development Results: Papua New Guinea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS DEVELOPMENT OF ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS Evaluation of undp ConTRIBuTIon PAPUA NEW GUINEA PAPUA effectiveness HUMAN DEVELOPMENT COORDINATI NEW efficiency sust GUINEA COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING FOR sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivene AN DEVELOPMENT responsiveness NATIONAL OWN ISBN #: 978-92-1-126323-7 NATIONAL OWNERSHIP effectiveness COORDINATI e-ISBN: 978-92-1-054999-8 United Nations Development Programme efficiency COORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP sust Evaluation Office 220 East 42nd Street New York, NY 10017, USA NATIONAL OWNERSHIP relevance MANAGING FOR Tel. (646) 781 4200, Fax (646) 781 4213 Internet: www.undp.org/evaluation sustainability MANAGING FOR RESULTS responsivene HUMAN DEVELOPMENT effectiveness COORDINATI Assessment of development results Evaluation of undp ConTRIBuTIon pApuA neW GuIneA Evaluation Office, August 2011 United Nations Development Programme REPORTS PUbLiSHED UNDER THE ADR SER iES Afghanistan Republic of the Congo Libya Seychelles Argentina Ecuador Malawi Somalia Bangladesh Egypt Maldives Sudan Barbados and OECS El Salvador Mongolia Syrian Arab Republic Benin Ethiopia Montenegro Tajikistan Bhutan Georgia Mozambique Thailand Bosnia and Herzegovina Ghana Nicaragua Tunisia Botswana Guatemala Nigeria Turkey Brazil Guyana Papua New Guinea Uganda Bulgaria Honduras Paraguay Ukraine Burkina Faso India Peru Uzbekistan Cambodia Indonesia The Philippines Viet Nam Chile Jamaica Rwanda Yemen China Jordan Senegal Zambia Colombia Lao PDR Serbia ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENT RESULTS: EVALUATiON OF UNDP cONTRibUTiON – PAPUA NEW GUiNEA Copyright © UNDP 2011, all rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Printed on recycled paper. The analysis and recommendations of this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme, its Executive Board or the United Nations Member States. This is an independent publication by the UNDP Evaluation Office. Editing: Jeffrey Stern, Suazion (suazion.com) Graphic design: Suazion (suazion.com) Cover images provided by Rita Willaert. AcKNOWLEDGEMENTS The UNDP Evaluation Office would like to offer The evaluation would not have been possible its sincere thanks to the evaluation team. The team without the commitment demonstrated by was led by Philip Tortell and comprised Sherrill David McLachlan, UN Resident Coordinator Wittington, Ozren Runic and John Duguman. and UNDP Resident Representative, and Carol Philip Tortell and John Duguman addressed Flore, Deputy Resident Representative. We UNDP work in the area of environment and very much appreciate the cooperation received energy support, Sherrill Wittington addressed from Patrick Pee, Operations manager, and the gender equality and support to crisis preven- programme and project staff of UNDP in Port tion and recovery in the Autonomous Region Moresby and in the field. We would also like to of Bougainville, and Ozren Runic addressed the thank the UNDP Regional Bureau for Asia and areas of Millennium Development Goals, govern- the Pacific, in particular, Vineet Bhatia, Chief of ance, HIV and AIDS and disaster risk reduction. South-East Asia and Pacific division, Sergelen Thanks also go to Vijayalakshmi Vadivelu as Dambadarjaa, and Rosemary Kalapurakal, for the UNDP Evaluation Office task manager. their valuable support and contribution to the Elizabeth De León-Jones provided valuable ADR process. research support. The Evaluation Office would like to thank the entire evaluation team for their The quality enhancement and administrative dedication and hard work throughout the exercise. support provided by Evaluation Office colleagues is critical to the successful conduct of all evalua- Our thanks are extended to stakeholders and tions. As part of the quality enhancement process, partners of UNDP Papua New Guinea, including Oscar Garcia, Alan Fox and Michael Reynolds members of the government, civil society, inter- provided an important internal review of the national development community, the United draft evaluation report. The Evaluation Office Nations family and members of the communities is grateful to Christine Bradley, who provided that the team consulted during the course of the valuable comments as an external reviewer. Many evaluation. In particular, the Evaluation Office thanks are due to Michelle Sy and Thuy Hang would like to thank Ms. Ruby Zarriga, Acting To, who provided valuable management and Secretary, Ms. Juliana Kubak, Acting Deputy administrative support to the evaluation process. Secretary and Joseph Turia, First Assistant Marina Blinova and Anish Pradhan assisted in Secretary fromthe Department of National the editing and publication process with the help Planning and Monitoring. of an external editor. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i FOREWORD This is the report of an independent country- risk management responded to key national level evaluation conducted by the United Nations needs and priorities. The evaluation also identi- Development Programme (UNDP) Evaluation fied a number of areas in which UNDP needs to Office in 2011. The evaluation examines the address specific challenges. These areas include strategic relevance and positioning of UNDP ensuring national ownership and capacity devel- support and its contributions to development opment of all UNDP interventions, following a results in Papua New Guinea from 2003 to 2011. more systematic approach to programming and At the national level, the period of evaluation enhancing synergies among interventions. There coincides with important efforts by the Govern- are missed opportunities in the areas of govern- ment of Papua New Guinea. These include ance and environment, which did not identify Vision 2050, the Papua New Guinea Develop- critical gaps for long-term support. In addition, ment Strategic Plan 2010–2030, and five yearly the Assessment recommends that UNDP should Medium-Term Development Plans. Papua have a more holistic approach on macro devel- New Guinea has established many institutional opment issues, such as furthering achievement arrangements for promoting good governance, has key monitoring and accountability struc- of the Millennium Development Goals, gender tures in place, and is poised to make economic equality, and environment. progress. However, development challenges The Assessment of Development Results was remain in ensuring that many of the policies, carried out at an accelerated pace by the Evalu- laws and regulations are implemented effectively. Furthermore, the resource boom due to liquefied ation Office in order to provide timely inputs natural gas and rapid economic expansion has for the new UNDP programme following the yet to generate a human development focus. The shortening of the current programme by one year evaluation therefore comes at a critical time when in January 2011, and to meet its commitment UNDP has an opportunity to further strengthen to align with the 2011–2015 Medium-Term the contributions it has made during the period Development Plan. The evaluation has provided being examined. recommendations to allow UNDP to build on the lessons learned from its programme in the The evaluation found that UNDP contributions past years. I hope it will be useful for UNDP as have been important in terms of responding to well as its national and international partners in national priorities and government needs. During Papua New Guinea and that it will help UNDP the period covered by the evaluation, UNDP continue to make a significant contributions to technical support to the government strength- achieving national development goals. ened institutional development and enhanced policy formulation. Although some of the areas were not key government priorities, UNDP interventions in the areas of Millennium Devel- opment Goal planning and monitoring, govern- ance, HIV and AIDS, conflict prevention and Saraswathi Menon recovery, energy and environment and disaster Director, UNDP Evaluation Office ii FOREWORD cONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations v Executive Summary vi Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Objective and Scope of the Evaluation 1 1.2 Methodology 1 Chapter 2. Development Context and Challenges 5 2.1 Government Policies 5 2.2 Economic Growth 6 2.3 Poverty Reduction 6 2.4 Millennium Development Goals 7 2.5 HIV and AIDS 8 2.6 Gender Equality and Human Rights 9 2.7 Governance 11 2.8 Environment, Energy and Climate Change 12 2.9 Disaster Risk Management 14 2.10 The Role of Development Cooperation 15 Chapter 3. UNDP Response 17 3.1 The UN Programme 17 3.2 The UNDP Country Programme and its Relevance 20 3.3 Programme Delivery 21 Chapter 4. UNDP Contribution to Development Results 25 4.1 Millennium Development Goals 25 4.2 Democratic Governance 26 4.3 Environment and Energy 31 4.4 HIV and AIDS 35 4.5 Disaster Risk Management 40 4.6 Crisis Prevention and Recovery in Bougainville 42 4.7 Gender Equality 46 4.8 UNDP Strategic Positioning 50 4.9 Summary of Results Achieved 52 Chapter 5. Conclusions and Recommendations 55 5.1 Conclusions 55 5.2 Recommendations 61 Annexes 65 Annex 1. Terms of Reference 65 Annex 2. Key Evaluation Criteria and Questions 75 Annex 3. Documents Consulted 79 Annex 4. Persons Consulted 82 C ONTENTS iii Annex 5. Likelihood of Achieving MDG and Medium-Term Development Strategy Targets 87 Annex 6. UNDP Outcomes Adopted by UNDP Country Programme 2008–2012 88 Annex 7. UNDP Project Portfolio, 2003–2012 89 Boxes Box. Evaluation criteria 2 Figures Figure 1. National HIV Prevalence Rate, Through