English Baccalaureate Research Report 2013 Web Version

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

English Baccalaureate Research Report 2013 Web Version English Baccalaureate Research January 2013 Teacher number statistics updated May 2013 Key Findings .............................................................................................................. 2 Withdrawing arts subjects ........................................................................................ 3 Children at schools with a high proportion of FSM more affected .......................... 4 Children and young people’s access to cultural activities ........................................ 5 Patterns in GCSE entries ........................................................................................... 6 Teacher numbers ...................................................................................................... 8 Initial Teacher Education numbers ....................................................................... 8 Appendix A - Analysis of the DfE Impact of the English Baccalaureate research ..... 9 Appendix B - Patterns in GCSE entries .................................................................... 14 Numbers of GCSEs sat in arts subjects 2002-2012 ............................................. 14 Number of GCSE sat 2002-2012 in arts subjects as a % of pupil numbers ......... 17 Subject percentage of total number of GCSEs sat .............................................. 19 GCSE attempts by subject by type of school ...................................................... 21 Appendix C - Information from DATA on Design and Technology GCSE entry patterns. ................................................................................................................. 23 Appendix D - Teacher numbers .............................................................................. 25 Number of teachers in schools Keystage 3 to 5 .................................................. 25 Highest level of qualification held in a relevant subject by teachers ................. 32 Percentage of hours taught a week by teachers with any relevant post A-Level qualification ........................................................................................................ 35 Percentage of hours taught a week by teachers with degree or higher ............ 36 Appendix E - Initial Teacher Education entrants .................................................... 37 Author: Sam Cairns [email protected] English Baccalaureate Research January 2013 Updated May 2013 Key Findings • Schools are withdrawing arts subjects as a result of the English Baccalaureate • Schools with a high proportion of children on free school meals are more than twice as likely to withdraw arts subjects than schools with a low proportion (21% versus 8%) • GCSE entries in arts subjects have fallen 20% in the last decade, and continue to fall The English Baccalaureate (EBacc) is having an adverse effect on arts subjects in schools. 15% of schools surveyed by Ipsos MORI in 2012 had withdrawn one or more arts subjects as a result of the EBacc. 21% of schools with a high proportion of free school meals (FSM) reported withdrawing arts subjects. This comes on the heels of a decade long fall in the number of students taking arts GCSEs. In the case of GCSEs in Art and Design subjects this fall is precisely similar to the drop in Geography GCSE entries, a drop that the government cites as one of the reasons for including Geography in the Ebacc. A further worrying trend, and one highlighted as an unintended consequence of the EBacc by the House of Commons Education Committee1, is the impact of the EBacc on children from disadvantaged backgrounds. Children at schools with a high proportion of FSM are more likely to have arts subjects withdrawn, and to have their GCSE option blocks affected; 65% of schools with high FSM reported changing their GCSE options as a result of the EBacc compared to 30% of schools with low FSM. The Committee also raised concerns that the EBacc would not only focus resources away from non-EBacc subjects, like the arts, but also away from the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children, as schools concentrated on students on the borderline of achieving the EBacc. These unintended impacts on the most disadvantaged children raise grave concerns, not least because of the evidence that arts subjects raise the attainment of children from lower socio-economic backgrounds, increase their employability and increase their chances of engaging with their communities. Research shows children from lower socio-economic backgrounds who take part in arts activities at school are three times more likely to get a degree, twice as likely to volunteer and 20% more likely to vote. Scottish research shows employability of students who study arts subjects is higher and they are more likely to stay in 1 House of Commons Education Committee, The English Baccalaureate Fifth Report of Session 2010-12 Volume I (London: The Stationary Office Limited, 2011) 2 English Baccalaureate Research January 2013 Updated May 2013 employment2. Schools provide a vital universal access point for children to the arts, and in some cases provide the only access point. DCMS Taking Part data shows that 33% of 11-15 year old boys and 20% of girls do not access arts outside of schools3 and that children from lower socio-economic backgrounds have less access to arts than children from wealthier families. Schools with a high proportion of FSM withdrawing arts subjects, narrowing children’s access to the arts should ring alarm bells. Withdrawing arts subjects In 2012 the Department for Education commissioned Ipsos MORI4 to survey schools on the impact of the Ebacc. Their sample consisted of 618 schools. See Appendix A for detailed analysis of the data. From the Ipsos MORI data5 we know in 2012: • 15% of schools surveyed withdrew one or more arts subjects6. • 21% of schools with a high proportion of FSM7 withdrew one or more arts subjects compared to 8% of schools with a low proportion of FSM. • 10% of schools with a high proportion of FSM said they had withdrawn Drama as a subject or course compared to 3% of schools with a low proportion of FSM. This correlates with the expectations of the expert witnesses at the House of Commons Education Committee held in April 2011 recorded in the report The English Baccalaureate who expected music to be damaged by the EBacc proposals8. The statistics below provide the detailed survey results from the Ipsos MORI survey which reported that 27% of schools had withdrawn any subject as a result of the 2 Cultural Learning Alliance, The Case for Cultural Learning: key research findings (London: Cultural Learning Alliance, 2011) 3 Helen Jones, Peter Millward (Knight, Kavanagh and Page) and Babatunde Buraimo (University Of Central Lancashire), Child participation in culture and sport Analysis of the 2008/09 Taking Part Survey, DCMS, London 2011, page 5-6 4 Helen Greevy, Anastasia Knox, Fay Nunney & Julia Pye, Ipsos MORI The effects of the English Baccalaureate (London: Department for Education, 2012) 5 Data acquired via a Freedom of Information request asking for the 618 survey returns the publication The effects of the English Baccalaureate was based on. 6The effects of the English Baccalaureate asked schools about subjects withdrawn. We have defined the following subjects from their list as arts subjects: Art, Drama/performing arts, Media studies, Music, Technology/Design technology, Textiles 7 High proportion of FSM-eligible pupils = above 16%, Medium proportion of FSM-eligible pupils = 6%-16%, Low proportion of FSM-eligible pupils = less than 6% 8House of Commons Education Committee, The English Baccalaureate Fifth Report of Session 2010-12 Volume I (London: The Stationary Office Limited, 2011) Q54 and Q55 3 English Baccalaureate Research January 2013 Updated May 2013 EBacc. We further analysed the data to isolate the number of schools who had withdrawn one or more arts subjects. Withdrew one or more arts subjects Proportion FSM High Medium Low All schools Withdrew non arts subjects 30 20 16 66 Withdrew one or more arts subjects 44 35 16 95 No subjects withdrawn 135 159 163 457 All schools in survey 209 214 195 618 Withdrew one or more arts subjects Proportion FSM High Medium Low All schools Withdrew non arts subjects 14% 9% 8% 11% Withdrew one or more arts subjects 21% 16% 8% 15% No subjects withdrawn 65% 74% 84% 74% What subjects or courses have been withdrawn? (Question 13b of the Ipsos MORI survey) Subject cut Proportion of FSM High Medium Low All schools Art 5% 5% 3% 4% Drama/Performing Arts 10% 5% 3% 6% Media studies 1% 1% 1% 1% Music 6% 4% 2% 4% Technology/Design technology 3% 6% 2% 4% Textiles 2% 5% 1% 3% P.E/Sport 2% 3% 3% 3% (PE has been included to provide a comparison) Children at schools with a high proportion of FSM more affected The English Baccalaureate performance measure is disproportionately affecting children at schools with a high proportion of pupils with Free School Meals9 (FSM). As set out above schools are more likely to withdraw an arts subject if they have a high proportion of FSM than schools with a low proportion (21% versus 8%). 9 Free School Meals (FSM) have been found to be a proxy for children from families: • In the bottom quartile of the income distribution • FSM status proxies “best” children in workless families and those with only one part- time worker FSM is status is statistically significant in the proxy variable regressions, so it does predict achievement in the absence of true SES (Socio-Economic Status) measures. However, FSM status does not always do a good job as a proxy
Recommended publications
  • Implementing the English Baccalaureate Government Consultation Response
    Implementing the English Baccalaureate Government consultation response July 2017 Contents Foreword from the Secretary of State for Education 4 Introduction 6 Definition of the English Baccalaureate 6 Summary of responses received and the government’s response 8 Summary of the government response 8 Question analysis 11 Question 1: What factors do you consider should be taken into account in making decisions about which pupils should not be entered for the EBacc? 11 Government response 11 Question 2: Is there any other information that should be made available about schools’ performance in the EBacc? 13 Government response 13 Question 3: How should this policy apply to university technical colleges (UTCs), studio schools and further education colleges teaching key stage 4 pupils? 15 Government response 16 Question 4: What challenges have schools experienced in teacher recruitment to EBacc subjects? 17 Question 5: What strategies have schools found useful in attracting and retaining staff in these subjects? 17 Question 8: What additional central strategies would schools like to see in place for recruiting and training teachers in EBacc subjects? 17 Government response to questions 4, 5 and 8 18 Question 6: What approaches do schools intend to take to manage challenges relating to the teaching of EBacc subjects? 19 Question 7: Other than teacher recruitment, what other issues will schools need to consider when planning for increasing the number of pupils taking the EBacc? 20 Government response to questions 6 and 7 20 Question 9: Do you think that any of the proposals have the potential to have an impact, positive or negative, on specific pupils, in particular those with ‘relevant protected characteristics’? (The relevant protected characteristics are disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex and sexual orientation).
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Accountability Measures Guidance Feb 2020
    Secondary accountability measures Guide for maintained secondary schools, academies and free schools February 2020 Contents Table of figures 5 Summary 6 Secondary accountability measures in 2019 6 Updates to the guidance in January 2020 7 Expiry or review date 8 Who is this guide for? 8 Secondary school performance measures 9 Progress 8 9 Pupils with extremely negative progress scores – change from 2018 and onwards 9 Percentage of pupils entering the English Baccalaureate 11 Percentage of pupils staying in education or going into employment after key stage 4 (pupil destinations) 11 Percentage of pupils achieving a grade 5 (strong pass) or above in English and maths 11 Attainment 8 12 English Baccalaureate average point score (APS) 12 Publication of key stage 4 secondary accountability measures 12 Schools that may benefit from support 13 Calculating Attainment 8 and Progress 8 14 Qualifications included in the measures 14 Maths qualifications 14 English qualifications 15 Qualifications in the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) subjects 15 Science and computer science qualifications 16 Qualifications in the ‘open’ element 16 Level 3 qualifications 17 Point scores 17 Discounting, pathway and first entry rules 18 Measurement of the progress of pupils with no key stage 2 test results. 18 Interpreting Progress 8 scores 19 Using performance data to predict individual pupils’ scores and sharing pupils’ progress data 19 2 Confidence intervals 20 Impact of the number of qualifications taken on a pupil’s Progress 8 score 20 Key stage 2 tests 21 Information
    [Show full text]
  • English Baccalaureate and Broadening the Curriculum Debate on 14 September 2017
    English Baccalaureate and Broadening the Curriculum Debate on 14 September 2017 Summary On 14 September 2017, the House of Lords is due to debate a motion, moved by Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative), that “this House takes note of the impact of the English Baccalaureate on the take-up of creative and technical subjects, and the case for broadening the curriculum to create a coherent and unified 14 to 19 phase”. This short briefing provides information on the introduction of the English Baccalaureate (EBacc) and recent reforms to technical education. It also provides a summary of the statistics on the take-up of different subjects by pupils. A selection of key documents is identified at the end of the briefing. English Baccalaureate The EBacc is a measure of the performance of pupils at Key Stage 4 (GCSE level). To achieve the EBacc, pupils must gain a C grade or above in the following five subjects: English; mathematics; either history or geography; the sciences; and a language.1 The Government has argued that the EBacc constitutes the core subjects of a rounded education, and that studying these subjects at GCSE, and then A-level, widens the opportunities for pupils trying to enter university.2 While take-up of the EBacc combination of subjects has increased gradually since its introduction, the EBacc is still entered by only a minority of pupils.3 In 2016, 36.8 percent of pupils in all schools did so.4 The equivalent figure for pupils in state-funded schools was 39.7 percent. In the same year, 23.1 percent of pupils in all schools achieved the EBacc, compared to 22.9 percent the previous year.5 Impact of the English Baccalaureate on GCSE Subject Groups The proportion of pupils taking individual EBacc subjects has for, the most part, increased over recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • England's Approach to School Performance Data – Lessons Learned
    By Martin Kaliszewski, Astrid Fieldsend and Tony McAleavy England’s approach to school performance data – lessons learned ENGLAND’S APPROACH TO SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DATA – LESSONS LEARNED England’s approach to school performance data – lessons learned Education Development Trust Highbridge House, 16–18 Duke Street, Reading, Berkshire RG1 4RU T +44 (0) 118 902 1000 E [email protected] W www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com 1 ENGLAND’S APPROACH TO SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DATA – LESSONS LEARNED © COPYRIGHT EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT TRUST 2017. THE VIEWS AND OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS PUBLICATION ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHORS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT TRUST. ISBN 978-1-909437-93-7 2 ENGLAND’S APPROACH TO SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DATA – LESSONS LEARNED Contents Welcome to Education Development Trust 4 About the authors 5 Foreword 8 Chapter 1: Introduction 10 Chapter 2: The lessons learned 14 Lesson 1: The school accountability system in England benefits from a data infrastructure of national tests and information about pupil characteristics, supported by technology 15 Lesson 2: English experience demonstrates the risks of an over-simplistic approach to school performance data 20 Lesson 3: In England, there has been an important and lively debate about ‘value-added’ measures which take into account the starting points of pupils 22 Lesson 4: There is a need for a national accountability system that evolves over time 25 Lesson 5: Accountability measures have played a significant role in the development of
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing the English Baccalaureate
    Consultation Response Form Consultation closing date: 29 January 2016 Your comments must reach us by that date Consultation on Implementing the English Baccalaureate If you would prefer to respond online to this consultation please use the following link: https://www.education.gov.uk/consultations The government is consulting on proposals to implement the EBacc manifesto commitment. This consultation gives the teaching profession and others with an interest in education the opportunity to help shape policy. Information provided in response to this consultation, including personal information, may be subject to publication or disclosure in accordance with the access to information regimes, primarily the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 1998. If you want all, or any part, of your response to be treated as confidential, please explain why you consider it to be confidential. If a request for disclosure of the information you have provided is received, your explanation about why you consider it to be confidential will be taken into account, but no assurance can be given that confidentiality can be maintained. An automatic confidentiality disclaimer generated by your IT system will not, of itself, be regarded as binding on the Department. The Department will process your personal data (name and address and any other identifying material) in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998, and in the majority of circumstances, this will mean that your personal data will not be disclosed to third parties. Please tick if you want us to keep your response confidential. Reason for confidentiality: Name: Cassie Chadderton Please tick if you are responding on behalf of your organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • English Baccalaureate Paul Bolton
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06045, 4 September 2017 By Robert Long English Baccalaureate Paul Bolton Inside: 1. Introduction and development: 2010-2015 2. A strengthened English Baccalaureate: Developments since the 2015 Election 3. Pupils entering and achieving the EBacc 4. English Baccalaureate Certificates www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 06045, 4 September 2017 2 Contents One page briefing 3 1. Introduction and development: 2010-2015 4 1.1 What is the English Baccalaureate? 4 1.2 Announcement and introduction 4 Rationale 5 1.3 Subject composition of the English Baccalaureate 6 Religious education 8 Creative subjects 8 1.4 Education Committee report (July 2011) 9 Government response (November 2011) 9 1.5 DfE report on the effect of the English Baccalaureate (February 2013) 10 2. A strengthened English Baccalaureate: Developments since the 2015 Election 11 2.1 Conservative Manifesto and post-election announcements (2015) 11 2.2 The 90% target and the EBacc consultation 11 2.3 Reaction and discussion 13 Concerns about subject focus and attainment 13 Debates on arts subject inclusion and petition; takeup of arts subjects at GCSE and A level 14 Teacher supply 16 Government view 17 2.4 Updated targets: Government consultation response 18 Conservative Manifesto 2017: updated targets 18 Government response to the consultation and next steps (July 2017) 18 2.5 Impact of the EBacc 19 Sutton Trust briefing 19 New Schools Network report on the EBacc and the arts 20 3. Pupils entering and achieving the EBacc 22 3.1 Pupils entering and achieving the EBacc 22 3.2 Non-EBacc subjects 23 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Policy October 2020
    Curriculum Policy Date First Published October 2020 Version 1 Last Approved Cycle Annually (October 2021) Contents Changes to this edition ......................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Curriculum Principles ...................................................................................... 2 Our Aims ....................................................................................................... 2 2. Our Curriculum Offer ...................................................................................... 4 At Key Stage 3 this will include a minimum of the National curriculum subject suite: ............................................................................................................ 4 At Key Stage 4 this will include: ...................................................................... 4 At Key Stage 5 this will include: ...................................................................... 4 Enrichment .................................................................................................... 5 Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) & SMSC ............................................... 5 Careers Advice & Guidance ............................................................................. 5 Changes to this edition First edition. Page 1 | 5 1. Introduction We firmly believe that all children, regardless of their background, circumstance
    [Show full text]
  • Key Stage 4 Options Information 2020 a Guide to the Curriculum for Years 10 and 11
    Key Stage 4 Options Information 2020 A guide to the curriculum for Years 10 and 11 Key Stage 4 (Year 10 and Year 11) Curriculum Wales High School provides a broad and balanced curriculum which engages and challenges our students to achieve the best possible range of qualifications they can. The curriculum is designed to offer students a diverse range of courses and learning experiences, and to develop skills and knowledge for life. Our students are in a rapidly changing world and the curriculum at Wales High School provides opportunities to progress and meet these challenges. This booklet provides information on the options process and individual subjects. It is an important document that should be referred to in order to make informed decisions. The information is also available on the school website. Key Information English Baccalaureate (EBacc) The EBacc is made up of the subjects which are considered essential to many degrees and open up lots of doors. Research shows that a pupil’s socio-economic background impacts the subjects they choose at GCSE, and that this determines their opportunities beyond school. A study by the UCL Institute of Education shows that studying subjects included in the EBacc provides students with greater opportunities in further education and increases the likelihood that a pupil will stay on in full-time education. Sutton Trust research reveals that studying the EBacc can help improve a young person’s performance in English and Maths. The EBacc is a set of subjects at GCSE that keeps young people’s options open for further study and future careers.
    [Show full text]
  • Researchers in Schools an Overview of the Education System in England
    Researchers in Schools An Overview of The Education System in England Contents What are the stages of education? ....................................................................................................... 2 What are Key Stages? ............................................................................................................................... 2 What is the National Curriculum? ........................................................................................................... 2 What subjects are studied at GCSE level? ............................................................................................ 3 What are EBacc subjects? ....................................................................................................................... 3 What are A Levels? .................................................................................................................................... 3 What are AS Levels? .................................................................................................................................. 3 Who sets the exams? ................................................................................................................................. 3 How are GCSEs and A Levels graded? ................................................................................................. 3 How do schools measure pupil progress? ............................................................................................. 4 How are state schools monitored? ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The English Baccalaureate (Ebacc) Curriculum
    Key Stage 4 Options Information Booklet St. Wilfrid’s R.C. College 2020 The English Baccalaureate (EBacc) Curriculum Dear Student, You are about to enter an important stage in your school life. Over the next two years you will be following a range of examination courses that will provide you with your first school certificates and, hopefully, lead to further success in the Sixth Form and beyond. In our school we want to provide you with the best possible education. To do this, we set high standards and help you do the very best you can. Our students have enjoyed considerable success in their examinations in the past and we are confident you will maintain this tradition in the future. Up to now you have been studying a wide range of subjects as part of a balanced curriculum that has provided you with a firm foundation for your GCSEs. In fact, you have followed a range of subjects that has met all of the requirements of the National Curriculum. In September you will progress to Key Stage 4, where each of the subjects taught have a specification which takes a certain amount of lesson time to get through. This makes it impossible to study an unlimited number of subjects in Years 10 and 11; you need to make some choices. To reach the best possible solution we make sure you follow courses that you have to do to fulfil the requirements of the National Curriculum and then we give you a choice of subjects to take up the rest of your time in school.
    [Show full text]
  • Welsh Independent Schools Council to Chair, 29.10.19
    P-05-888 Make GCSE Welsh Language compulsory in all schools in Wales, Correspondence - Welsh Independent Schools Council to Chair, 29.10.19 Dear Mrs Finch-Saunders RE: Petition P-05-888 Make GCSE Welsh Language compulsory in all schools in Wales Thank you for your letter of the 2nd October 2019, the contents of which are noted. Following your letter of 5th July 2019 Welsh Independent Schools Council undertook a straw poll of WISC member schools that undertook Welsh. (Please note that we now represent and support the vast majority of mainstream independent schools in Wales and just under two thirds of the country’s independent special schools, namely 53 out of 75 independent schools in Wales). 21% of schools in WISC membership offer their pupils the opportunity to learn Welsh at Key Stage 3 and optional Welsh GCSE at Key Stage 4 and Key Stage 5 A Level. Please note that this figure may be higher as not all schools responded to this poll. Also, this figure does not include those schools that teach incidental Welsh. And of course, this figure fluctuates if parents wish their children to be taught Welsh. I reiterate the contents of my initial response in my letter of the 18th July that most member schools agree with most of what you are saying in the text of your petition that every child should have ‘the chance to learn Welsh’. Schools realise the importance of and see the value of the Welsh Language and are aware of certain professions which require GCSE Welsh for our students remaining in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking General Education in the English Upper Secondary System
    London Review of Education Rethinking general education in the English upper secondary system Ann Hodgson and Ken Spours March 2011 1 Abstract The Secretary of State for Education’s recent announcement of an English Baccalaureate at 16+ has opened up a debate about the nature of general education in the English upper secondary system. Drawing on evidence from national and local studies, we argue that it is important to see general education in England, not only in terms of the curriculum, but also as the product of a range of inter-related factors, which together form a ‘model’. Using this analytical framework, we describe and analyse the two models of general education associated with the New Labour and Coalition administrations respectively. We conclude by suggesting a set of challenges and principles to inform the development of a third, curriculum-led model. Key words: general education; upper secondary education; GCSEs and A Levels; knowledge; comprehensiveness; vocational education; the English Baccalaureate 2 General education in the English system The announcement by Secretary of State for Education, Michael Gove, of an English Baccalaureate as a prime measure of secondary education performance at the age of 16 (Gove, 2010a) marked a new emphasis on the role of general education in the English upper secondary system, which is undertaken by young people between the ages of 14 and 19. As the subsequent schools White Paper - The Importance of Teaching (DfE, 2010a) – outlined, the English Baccalaureate comprises the acquisition of five ‘good’ General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) grades in English, mathematics, a science, a language and either history or geography.
    [Show full text]