DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Ecology Progress Series 607:85

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Ecology Progress Series 607:85 The following supplement accompanies the article Artificial structures versus mangrove prop roots: a general comparison of epifaunal communities within the Indian River Lagoon, Florida, USA Dean S. Janiak*, Richard W. Osman, Christopher J. Freeman, Valerie J. Paul *Corresponding author: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 607: 85–98 (2018) Figure S1. nMDS plots for each sampling event using Bray-Curtis similarity matrix. Each point represents the average of 3 replicates taken at each site. Triangles, labeled A, represent artificial habitat and open circles, labeled MG, represent mangrove habitat. Some events have two graphs, the first to include all sites and the second, a subset with outliers removed. a) b) Quarterly Sites Quarterly Samples 10/2014 01/2015 Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity 2D Stress: 0.11 2D Stress: 0.13 Habitat M_01 Habitat A A MG MG IRL_05 M_05 B_01 IRL_11 M_05 B_05M_06IRL_07M_02M_04 IRL_03IRL_09 IRL_06IRL_04IRL_02 M_02 B_04 IRL_13mgIRL_13dIRL_08 IRL_11 IRL_01B_02IRL_09IRL_12IRL_10B_07 IRL_07IRL_08IRL_06B_05 M_04M_06IRL_10 B_06alt B_06 B_04 IRL_02 IRL_04 B_03 M_01 IRL_01 IRL_13mgB_02 IRL_03 IRL_13d B_01 B_07 B_03 B_08 IRL_12 B_06 B_08 IRL_05 B_06alt c) d) Quarterly Samples Quarterly Samples - B_03 Included 04/2015 07/2015 Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity 2D Stress: 0.12 Habitat 2D Stress: 0.01 Habitat B_04 IRL_12 A A IRL_05 MG MG IRL_04IRL_10IRL_11IRL_01B_05IRL_09 B_06altIRL_08B_02 IRL_06IRL_13mgIRL_13d IRL_02IRL_07M_04B_07 B_01 B_06 M_06 IRL_03 M_02 B_08 IRL_13mgIRL_13dIRL_11B_06altIRL_01IRL_04IRL_06IRL_08IRL_03IRL_07IRL_09IRL_02IRL_05IRL_12IRL_10M_02M_06M_04M_05B_04B_07B_02B_01M_01B_05B_08B_06 B_03 M_05 B_03 M_01 1 e) f) Quarterly Samples - B_03 Removed Quarterly Samples - B_03 & IRL_03 Included 07/2015 10/2015 Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity 2D Stress: 0.13 Habitat 2D Stress: 0.01 IRL_10 B_03 Habitat A A MG MG IRL_12 IRL_09 B_05 IRL_05 IRL_02 IRL_13mg IRL_11IRL_01 B_04IRL_13dIRL_04 M_06 IRL_06B_07 M_04 B_06alt IRL_08M_05 IRL_03 IRL_13mgIRL_05IRL_13dIRL_01IRL_12IRL_09IRL_08IRL_02IRL_10IRL_11IRL_06IRL_07IRL_04M_04M_01M_05B_02B_06B_05B_04B_08M_02B_07B_01 IRL_07 B_02 B_06alt M_02 B_01 M_01 B_08 B_06 IRL_03 g) h) Quarterly Samples - B_03 & IRL_03 Removed Quarterly Samples - B_03 Inlcuded 10/2015 01/2016 Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity 2D Stress: 0.1 B_06alt Habitat 2D Stress: 0.01 Habitat A A MG MG IRL_05 IRL_01 IRL_13mg B_05 IRL_12 M_01 M_01 B_04B_07 IRL_02 IRL_13mgIRL_13dB_06altIRL_01IRL_05IRL_12IRL_06IRL_11IRL_09IRL_02IRL_08IRL_03IRL_10IRL_04M_04B_06M_02B_01B_04B_05B_08M_05M_06B_02B_07 B_03 B_08IRL_11IRL_08 B_02 IRL_06IRL_07 IRL_10 IRL_13d IRL_09 B_01 IRL_04 M_04 M_05 M_02 B_06 i) j) Quarterly Samples - B_03 Removed Quarterly Samples 01/2016 04/2016 Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity 2D Stress: 0.12 2D Stress: 0.15 B_01 Habitat Habitat A M_06M_05 A B_07 IRL_03 MG M_04 IRL_02 MG B_08 IRL_05 M_02 B_01 B_02 B_04 M_02 IRL_02 IRL_07IRL_13d IRL_06 IRL_08 IRL_06 B_07 IRL_04 IRL_11 IRL_11IRL_09 B_08 IRL_10 IRL_03 IRL_04 B_03 M_04 M_05 IRL_05 IRL_10 B_04 B_05 B_02 B_05 IRL_08 B_06alt IRL_13mg IRL_01 IRL_13d M_06 M_01 IRL_09 B_06 B_06alt IRL_13mg IRL_01 B_06 IRL_12 IRL_12 M_01 k) l) Quarterly Samples - B_03 Included Quarterly Samples - B_03 Removed 07/2016 07/2016 Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity Resemblance: S17 Bray-Curtis similarity 2D Stress: 0.01 Habitat 2D Stress: 0.07 Habitat A A MG MG M_05 B_08 IRL_02 IRL_10 IRL_09 IRL_08IRL_11 IRL_07IRL_13d IRL_13mg IRL_06M_04B_07IRL_04 IRL_13mgIRL_13dIRL_04IRL_11IRL_03IRL_07IRL_10IRL_06IRL_08IRL_09IRL_02IRL_01IRL_05B_06aIRL_12B_01B_08M_05M_04B_05M_06B_02B_06B_07M_02M_01 B_03 IRL_03 M_02 B_02 IRL_12 M_01B_01M_06IRL_01B_06a IRL_05 B_06 B_05 2 Table S1. Species list for all taxa identified at least to genus. Letters indicate species origin status (N = native, I = introduced, and U = unknown or cryptogenic) Porifera Clathrina sp. U Cliona sp. U Darwinella rosacea N Halichondria cf magniconulosa N Halichondria melanadocia N Haliclona curacaoensis N Haliclona implexiformis N Haliclona manglaris N Halisarca sp. U Hymeniacidon heliophila N Leucosolenia sp. U Mycale microsigmatosa N Suberites aurantiacus N Sycon ciliatum I Tedania ignis N Platyhelminthes Euplana gracilis N Stylochus ellipticus N Cnidaria Actinia bermudensis N Anemone sp. A U Anemone sp. B U Anemonesp. C U Bimeria vestita I Bunodeopsis antilliensis N Campanularia macroscypha N Clytia linearis I Clytia noliformis I Diadumene franciscana I Diadumene leucolena N Dynamena cornicina I Eudendrium annulatum I Eudendrium carneum I Exaiptasia pallida N Halecium sp. U Hebella scandens N Obelia bidentata I Obelia dichotoma I Obelia geniculata I Obelia sp. U Plumularia floridana N Tubularia sp. U Mollusca Anomia simplex N Arcuatula papyria N Astyris lunata N Bostrycapulus aculeatus N Brachidontes exustus N Cardotes floridanus N Cerithium sp. U Cinctura hunteria N 3 Costoanachis avara N Crassostrea virginica N Crepidula atrasolea N Crepidula depressa N Crepidula fornicata N Diodora cayenensis N Geukensia demissa N Hiatella arctica N Mytella charruana I Mytilopsis sallei N Nassarius vibex N Perna viridis I Petaloconchus varians N Urosalpinx cinerea N Sipuncula Phascolion cryptum N Annelida Alitta succinea N Bispira brunnea N Branchiomma bairdi N Cirratulus grandis N Fabricia stellaris I Ficopomatus enigmaticus I Ficopomatus miamiensis N Hydroides dianthus I Hydroides dirampha N Hydroides elegans I Hydroides floridana N Hydroides sanctaecrucis N Hydroides sp. U Janua sp. U Lumbrinereis sp. U Marphysa sanguinea N Pileolaria berkeleyana I Polydora cornuta N Sabella sp. U Salmacina huxleyi N Serpula sp. U Spirobranchus minutus I Terebella sp. A U Terebella sp. B. U Vermiliopsis infundibulum I Arthropoda Amphibalanus amphitrite I Amphibalanus eburneus N Amphibalanus improvisus N Amphibalanus reticulatus I Amphibalanus subalbidus N Amphibalanus venustus N Balanus trigonus I Caprella penantis I Chthamalus fragilis N Cirolana sp. U Erichsonella attenuata N Ericthonius brasiliensis I 4 Ericthonius punctatus N Eurypanapeus depressus N Leptochelia rapax N Libinia dubia N Megabalanus coccopoma I Menippe mercenaria N Monocorophium insidiosum N Pachygrapsus transversus I Palaemonetes pugio N Petrolisthes armatus I Sphaeroma terebrans I Bryozoa Acanthodesia savartii N Aeverrillia armata N Alcyonidium polyoum N Amathia distans I Amathia gracilis N Amathia verticillata I Amathia vidovici I Anguinella palmata N Bugula neritina I Bugula stolonifera N Conopeum chesapeakensis N Conopeum tenuissimum N Cradoscrupocellaria atlantica N Cradoscrupocellaria bertholleti I Hippoporina indica I Jellyella tuberculata I Membranipora sp. U Membranipora tenella N Nolella stipata I Parasmittina nitida N Savignyella lafonti I Schizoporella pungens I Triticella sp. U Victorella pavida I Watersipora subtorquata I Entoprocta Barentsia sp. U Echinodermata Ophiactis sp. U Chordata Aplidium antillense N Aplidium sp. A U Aplidium sp. B U Ascidia curvata N Botrylloides nigrum N Botrylloides sp. U Botryllus schlosseri N Botryllus sp. U Clavelina oblonga N Cystodytes dellechiajei N Didemnum perlucidum I Didemnum sp. U Diplosoma glandulosum N Diplosoma listerianum I 5 Diplosoma sp. U Distaplia bermudensis N Distaplia corolla N Ecteinascidia turbinata N Eudistoma clarum N Eudistoma hepaticum N Eudistoma obscuratum N Eudistoma sp. N Eusynstyela sp. U Herdmania momus N Lissoclinum fragile N Microcosmus exasperatus N Molgula manhattensis N Molgula occidentalis N Perophora viridis N Phallusia nigra N Polyandrocarpa zorritensis I Polyclinum constellatum I Pyura vittata N Styela canopus I Styela plicata I Symplegma brakenhielmi I Symplegma rubra N 6 Table S2. SIMPER analysis for established communities. 10/14 Ave Diss = 55.48 Mangrove Artificial Species Av.Abund Av.Abund Av.Diss Diss/SD Contrib% Cum.% Amphibalanus eburneus 52.37 55.52 15.62 1.57 28.16 28.16 Open Space 21.17 13.5 9.38 1.01 16.91 45.06 Mytilopsis sallei 8.33 0 3.86 0.39 6.97 52.03 Amphipod tubes 8.4 3.06 3.67 0.72 6.61 58.64 Hydroids 2.73 7.61 3.22 1.07 5.81 64.45 Diplosoma listerianum 3.93 4.15 2.84 0.69 5.12 69.56 Branchiomma bairdi 2.17 2.91 1.51 0.63 2.71 72.28 01/15 Ave Diss = 58.77 Mangrove Artificial Species Av.Abund Av.Abund Av.Diss Diss/SD Contrib% Cum.% Amphibalanus eburneus 54.83 50.48 15.88 1.14 27.02 27.02 Anemone sp. C 0 12.06 6 0.57 10.21 37.23 Amphipod tubes 8.7 1.41 4.22 0.88 7.18 44.41 Open Space 8.7 4.81 3.86 1.32 6.57 50.98 Bugula neritina 1.93 4.31 2.81 0.5 4.78 55.76 Schizoporella pungens 0 5.39 2.65 0.33 4.52 60.28 Victorella pavida 3.7 0.89 2.18 0.59 3.71 63.99 Amphibalanus improvisus 3.47 0.19 1.79 0.28 3.05 67.04 Halichondria cf magniconulosa 0.1 2.5 1.23 0.42 2.1 69.14 Molgula occidentalis 0.37 2.07 1.17 0.26 1.99 71.13 04/15 Ave Diss = 52.59 Mangrove Artificial Species Av.Abund Av.Abund Av.Diss Diss/SD Contrib% Cum.% Amphibalanus eburneus 62.17 48.96 13.3 1.31 25.28 25.28 Open Space 17.23 9.72 6.92 1.02 13.16 38.44 Amphipod tubes 5.57 2.19 2.64 0.68 5.02 43.47 Various Algae 2.27 4.33 2.51 0.66 4.77 48.23 Anemone sp. B 0 4.7 2.17 0.3 4.12 52.35 Schizoporella pungens 0 4.41 2.02 0.37 3.83 56.19 Suberites aurantiacus 0 4 1.85 0.25 3.51 59.7 Hydroids 3.33 1.67 1.76 0.82 3.34 63.04 Conopeum spp. 1.37 1.83 1.41 0.4 2.67 65.71 Halichondria cf magniconulosa 0.47 2.65 1.32 0.61 2.5 68.22 Bugula neritina 2.13 0.65 1.24 0.43 2.35 70.57 07/15 Ave Diss = 52.97 Mangrove Artificial Species Av.Abund Av.Abund Av.Diss Diss/SD Contrib% Cum.% Amphibalanus eburneus 43.4 64.44 15.07 1.45 28.45 28.45 Open Space 19.53 11.74 7.03 1.17 13.28 41.73 Amphibalanus reticulatus 5.77 0.72 2.98 0.46 5.62 47.35 Hydroids 5.23 2.13 2.66 0.85 5.02 52.38 Amphipod tubes 2.97 2.39 1.84 0.9 3.48 55.86 Various Algae 1.53 2.3 1.5 0.76 2.82 58.68 Conopeum spp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recreational Boating As a Major Vector of Spread of Nonindigenous Species Around the Mediterranean Aylin Ulman
    Recreational boating as a major vector of spread of nonindigenous species around the Mediterranean Aylin Ulman To cite this version: Aylin Ulman. Recreational boating as a major vector of spread of nonindigenous species around the Mediterranean. Ecosystems. Sorbonne Université, 2018. English. NNT : 2018SORUS222. tel- 02483397 HAL Id: tel-02483397 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02483397 Submitted on 18 Feb 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Sorbonne Université Università di Pavia Ecole doctorale CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogeochimie des Environments Benthiques, LECOB, F-66650 Banyuls-sur-Mer, France Recreational boating as a major vector of spread of non- indigenous species around the Mediterranean La navigation de plaisance, vecteur majeur de la propagation d’espèces non-indigènes autour des marinas Méditerranéenne Par Aylin Ulman Thèse de doctorat de Philosophie Dirigée par Agnese Marchini et Jean-Marc Guarini Présentée et soutenue publiquement le 6 Avril, 2018 Devant un jury composé de : Anna Occhipinti (President, University
    [Show full text]
  • Congolli (Pseudaphritis Urvillii) and Australian Salmon (Arripis Truttaceus and A
    Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 SARDI Aquatics Sciences PO Box 120 Henley Beach SA 5022 September 2015 Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong George Giatas and Qifeng Ye SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1 SARDI Research Report Series No. 858 September 2015 II Giatas and Ye (2015) Diet of three fish species in the Coorong This publication may be cited as: Giatas, G.C. and Ye, Q. (2015). Diet and trophic characteristics of mulloway (Argyrosomus japonicus), congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) and Australian salmon (Arripis truttaceus and A. trutta) in the Coorong. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), Adelaide. SARDI Publication No. F2015/000479-1. SARDI Research Report Series No. 858. 81pp. South Australian Research and Development Institute SARDI Aquatic Sciences 2 Hamra Avenue West Beach SA 5024 Telephone: (08) 8207 5400 Facsimile: (08) 8207 5406 http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/research DISCLAIMER The authors warrant that they have taken all reasonable care in producing this report. The report has been through the SARDI internal review process, and has been formally approved for release by the Research Chief, Aquatic Sciences. Although all reasonable efforts have been made to ensure quality, SARDI does not warrant that the information in this report is free from errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Marine Alien and Invasive Species
    Table 1: The list of 96 marine alien and invasive species recorded along the coastline of South Africa. Phylum Class Taxon Status Common name Natural Range ANNELIDA Polychaeta Alitta succinea Invasive pile worm or clam worm Atlantic coast ANNELIDA Polychaeta Boccardia proboscidea Invasive Shell worm Northern Pacific ANNELIDA Polychaeta Dodecaceria fewkesi Alien Black coral worm Pacific Northern America ANNELIDA Polychaeta Ficopomatus enigmaticus Invasive Estuarine tubeworm Australia ANNELIDA Polychaeta Janua pagenstecheri Alien N/A Europe ANNELIDA Polychaeta Neodexiospira brasiliensis Invasive A tubeworm West Indies, Brazil ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora websteri Alien oyster mudworm N/A ANNELIDA Polychaeta Polydora hoplura Invasive Mud worm Europe, Mediterranean ANNELIDA Polychaeta Simplaria pseudomilitaris Alien N/A Europe BRACHIOPODA Lingulata Discinisca tenuis Invasive Disc lamp shell Namibian Coast BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Virididentula dentata Invasive Blue dentate moss animal Indo-Pacific BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugulina flabellata Invasive N/A N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Bugula neritina Invasive Purple dentate mos animal N/A BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Conopeum seurati Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Cryptosula pallasiana Invasive N/A Europe BRYOZOA Gymnolaemata Watersipora subtorquata Invasive Red-rust bryozoan Caribbean CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Cladophora prolifera Invasive N/A N/A CHLOROPHYTA Ulvophyceae Codium fragile Invasive green sea fingers Korea CHORDATA Actinopterygii Cyprinus carpio Invasive Common carp Asia CHORDATA Ascidiacea
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Reef-Building, Ecosystem Engineering Polychaetes in Shallow Water Ecosystems
    diversity Review Role of Reef-Building, Ecosystem Engineering Polychaetes in Shallow Water Ecosystems Martín Bruschetti 1,2 1 Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC)-CONICET, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina; [email protected] 2 Laboratorio de Ecología, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, FCEyN, Laboratorio de Ecología 7600, Argentina Received: 15 June 2019; Accepted: 15 September 2019; Published: 17 September 2019 Abstract: Although the effect of ecosystem engineers in structuring communities is common in several systems, it is seldom as evident as in shallow marine soft-bottoms. These systems lack abiotic three-dimensional structures but host biogenic structures that play critical roles in controlling abiotic conditions and resources. Here I review how reef-building polychaetes (RBP) engineer their environment and affect habitat quality, thus regulating community structure, ecosystem functioning, and the provision of ecosystem services in shallow waters. The analysis focuses on different engineering mechanisms, such as hard substrate production, effects on hydrodynamics, and sediment transport, and impacts mediated by filter feeding and biodeposition. Finally, I deal with landscape-level topographic alteration by RBP. In conclusion, RBP have positive impacts on diversity and abundance of many species mediated by the structure of the reef. Additionally, by feeding on phytoplankton and decreasing water turbidity, RBP can control primary production, increase light penetration, and might alleviate the effects of eutrophication
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Keys for the Identification of Families and Genera of Atlantic
    Biota Neotropica ISSN: 1676-0611 [email protected] Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Brasil Moreira da Rocha, Rosana; Bastos Zanata, Thais; Moreno, Tatiane Regina Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians Biota Neotropica, vol. 12, núm. 1, enero-marzo, 2012, pp. 1-35 Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Campinas, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199123750022 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Keys for the identification of families and genera of Atlantic shallow water ascidians Rocha, R.M. et al. Biota Neotrop. 2012, 12(1): 000-000. On line version of this paper is available from: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/en/abstract?identification-key+bn01712012012 A versão on-line completa deste artigo está disponível em: http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v12n1/pt/abstract?identification-key+bn01712012012 Received/ Recebido em 16/07/2011 - Revised/ Versão reformulada recebida em 13/03/2012 - Accepted/ Publicado em 14/03/2012 ISSN 1676-0603 (on-line) Biota Neotropica is an electronic, peer-reviewed journal edited by the Program BIOTA/FAPESP: The Virtual Institute of Biodiversity. This journal’s aim is to disseminate the results of original research work, associated or not to the program, concerned with characterization, conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity within the Neotropical region. Biota Neotropica é uma revista do Programa BIOTA/FAPESP - O Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade, que publica resultados de pesquisa original, vinculada ou não ao programa, que abordem a temática caracterização, conservação e uso sustentável da biodiversidade na região Neotropical.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution and Unexpected Genetic Diversity of the Non-Indigenous Annelid Ficopomatus Enigmaticus in California
    Aquatic Invasions (2019) Volume 14, Issue 2: 250–266 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article The distribution and unexpected genetic diversity of the non-indigenous annelid Ficopomatus enigmaticus in California Alison Yee1, Joshua Mackie2 and Bruno Pernet1,* 1Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach,1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90840, USA 2Gilmac P/L, Suite G04, 1 Havelock Street, West Perth 6005, Australia Author e-mails: [email protected] (AY), [email protected] (JM), [email protected] (BP) *Corresponding author Citation: Yee A, Mackie J, Pernet B (2019) The distribution and unexpected Abstract genetic diversity of the non-indigenous annelid Ficopomatus enigmaticus in The non-indigenous annelid Ficopomatus enigmaticus has been established in San California. Aquatic Invasions 14(2): 250– Francisco Bay since at least 1921, but in the past 30 years it has also been found in 266, https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2019.14.2.06 other parts of California. In the summer of 2017 we surveyed 136 sites to determine Received: 25 October 2018 its current distribution in the state. We found F. enigmaticus at 23 sites ranging Accepted: 23 January 2019 from San Francisco Bay in the north to Newport Bay in the south. Populations were concentrated in four regions: San Francisco Bay, Monterey Bay, Santa Barbara, and Published: 29 March 2019 sites in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Presence sites did not differ systematically Handling editor: Maiju Lehtiniemi in salinity or temperature from absence sites, but all presence sites appeared to have Thematic editor: Charles W. Martin restricted exchange of water with nearby oceanic habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Study and Control of Marine Fouling Organisms, Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Reports 2-24-1967 Study and control of marine fouling organisms, Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia Morris L. Brehmer Virginia Institute of Marine Science Maynard M. Nichols Virginia Institute of Marine Science Dale R. Calder Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/reports Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Brehmer, M. L., Nichols, M. M., & Calder, D. R. (1967) Study and control of marine fouling organisms, Naval Base, Norfolk, Virginia. Virginia Institute of Marine Science, William & Mary. https://doi.org/10.25773/ 8r5a-bg73 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. v ' V v 57l0 S'TUDY l\:ORFOLK~ subrnitred to ~lantic Division, Naval Facili~ies by The Institute of Marine Science Gloucester Point) 24 196 L. Brehmer) Ph.D. ) YL A. The Institute of Marine Science inves and distribution of marine responsible for condenser of -draft vessels, Physical studies of acent Che were conducted ln the model ssiss ~Cf!.e pa"cterns and ort mechanisss of ~he area. Control rernoval s were evaluated. The biological program included removed heat s Naval personnel, 2) a sarnpling· program on the shoals and bars in the vicini of the Naval Base/ r, \ 0) and special interval moni of the Pier 12 and s:; 4) sub removal opera~ions, 5) plate studies Pier 12 and on the shoals of s The ical program and cur·ren"c Roads arec;~ in VIHS ,.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the Atlantic and Mediterranean Coasts of the Iberian Peninsula: an Annotated Checklist E
    López and Richter Helgol Mar Res (2017) 71:19 DOI 10.1186/s10152-017-0499-6 Helgoland Marine Research ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Non‑indigenous species (NIS) of polychaetes (Annelida: Polychaeta) from the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts of the Iberian Peninsula: an annotated checklist E. López* and A. Richter Abstract This study provides an updated catalogue of non-indigenous species (NIS) of polychaetes reported from the conti- nental coasts of the Iberian Peninsula based on the available literature. A list of 23 introduced species were regarded as established and other 11 were reported as casual, with 11 established and nine casual NIS in the Atlantic coast of the studied area and 14 established species and seven casual ones in the Mediterranean side. The most frequent way of transport was shipping (ballast water or hull fouling), which according to literature likely accounted for the intro- ductions of 14 established species and for the presence of another casual one. To a much lesser extent aquaculture (three established and two casual species) and bait importation (one established species) were also recorded, but for a large number of species the translocation pathway was unknown. About 25% of the reported NIS originated in the Warm Western Atlantic region, followed by the Tropical Indo West-Pacifc region (18%) and the Warm Eastern Atlantic (12%). In the Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula, nearly all the reported NIS originated from warm or tropi- cal regions, but less than half of the species recorded from the Atlantic side were native of these areas. The efects of these introductions in native marine fauna are largely unknown, except for one species (Ficopomatus enigmaticus) which was reported to cause serious environmental impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of the Non-Native Bryozoan Amathia (= Zoobotryon) Verticillata (Delle Chiaje, 1822) (Ctenostomata) in the Galápagos Islands
    BioInvasions Records (2015) Volume 4, Issue 4: 255–260 Open Access doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/bir.2015.4.4.04 © 2015 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2015 REABIC Rapid Communication First record of the non-native bryozoan Amathia (= Zoobotryon) verticillata (delle Chiaje, 1822) (Ctenostomata) in the Galápagos Islands 1 2,5 3 4 5 6 Linda McCann *, Inti Keith , James T. Carlton , Gregory M. Ruiz , Terence P. Dawson and Ken Collins 1Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 3152 Paradise Drive, Tiburon, CA 94920, USA 2Charles Darwin Foundation, Marine Science Department, Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos, Ecuador 3Maritime Studies Program, Williams College-Mystic Seaport, 75 Greenmanville Avenue, Mystic, Connecticut 06355, USA 4Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD 21037, USA 5School of the Environment, University of Dundee, Perth Road, Dundee, DD1 4HN, UK 6Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK E-mail: [email protected] (LM), [email protected] (IK), [email protected] (JC), [email protected] (GMR), [email protected] (TD), [email protected] (KC) *Corresponding author Received: 9 June 2015 / Accepted: 31 August 2015 / Published online: 18 September 2015 Handling editor: Thomas Therriault Abstract The warm water marine bryozoan Amathia (= Zoobotryon) verticillata (delle Chiaje, 1822) is reported for the first time in the Galápagos Islands based upon collections in 2015. Elsewhere, this species is a major fouling organism that can have significant negative ecological and economic effects. Comprehensive studies will be necessary to determine the extent of the distribution of A.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Heterogeneity and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Guilds in Italian Lagoons Alberto Basset, Nicola Galuppo & Letizia Sabetta
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ESE - Salento University Publishing Transitional Waters Bulletin TWB, Transit. Waters Bull. 1(2006), 48-63 ISSN 1825-229X, DOI 10.1285/i1825226Xv1n1p48 http://siba2.unile.it/ese/twb Environmental heterogeneity and benthic macroinvertebrate guilds in italian lagoons Alberto Basset, Nicola Galuppo & Letizia Sabetta Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies University of Salento S.P. Lecce-Monteroni 73100 Lecce RESEARCH ARTICLE ITALY Abstract 1 - Lagoons are ecotones between freshwater, marine and terrestrial biotopes, characterized by internal ecosystem heterogeneity, due to patchy spatial and temporal distribution of biotic and abiotic components, and inter-ecosystem heterogeneity, due to the various terrestrial-freshwater and freshwater-marine interfaces. 2 - Here, we carried out an analysis of environmental heterogeneity and benthic macro-invertebrate guilds in a sample of 26 Italian lagoons based on literature produced over a 25 year period.. 3 - In all, 944 taxonomic units, belonging to 13 phyla, 106 orders and 343 families, were recorded. Most species had a very restricted geographic distribution range. 75% of the macroinvertebrate taxa were observed in less than three of the twenty-six lagoons considered. 4 - Similarity among macroinvertebrate guilds in lagoon ecosystems was remarkably low, ranging from 10.5%±7.5% to 34.2%±14.4% depending on the level of taxonomic resolution. 5 - Taxonomic heterogeneity was due to both differences in species richness and to differences in species composition: width of seaward outlet, lagoon surface area and water salinity were the most important factors affecting species richness, together accounting for up to 75% of observed inter-lagoon heterogeneity, while distance between lagoons was the most significant factor affecting similarity of species composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Bryozoans (Ectoprocta) of the Indian River Area (Florida)
    MARINE BRYOZOANS (ECTOPROCTA) OF THE INDIAN RIVER AREA (FLORIDA) JUDITH E. WINSTON BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 173 : ARTICLE 2 NEW YORK : 1982 MARINE BRYOZOANS (ECTOPROCTA) OF THE INDIAN RIVER AREA (FLORIDA) JUDITH E. WINSTON Assistant Curator, Department of Invertebrates American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Volume 173, article 2, pages 99-176, figures 1-94, tables 1-10 Issued June 28, 1982 Price: $5.30 a copy Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 1982 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract 102 Introduction 102 Materials and Methods 103 Systematic Accounts 106 Ctenostomata 106 Alcyonidium polyoum (Hassall), 1841 106 Alcyonidium polypylum Marcus, 1941 106 Nolella stipata Gosse, 1855 106 Anguinella palmata van Beneden, 1845 108 Victorella pavida Saville Kent, 1870 108 Sundanella sibogae (Harmer), 1915 108 Amathia alternata Lamouroux, 1816 108 Amathia distans Busk, 1886 110 Amathia vidovici (Heller), 1867 110 Bowerbankia gracilis Leidy, 1855 110 Bowerbankia imbricata (Adams), 1798 Ill Bowerbankia maxima, New Species Ill Zoobotryon verticillatum (Delle Chiaje), 1828 113 Valkeria atlantica (Busk), 1886 114 Aeverrillia armata (Verrill), 1873 114 Cheilostomata 114 Aetea truncata (Landsborough), 1852 114 Aetea sica (Couch), 1844 116 Conopeum tenuissimum (Canu), 1908 116 IConopeum seurati (Canu), 1908 117 Membranipora arborescens (Canu and Bassler), 1928 117 Membranipora savartii (Audouin), 1926 119 Membranipora tuberculata (Bosc), 1802 119 Membranipora tenella Hincks,
    [Show full text]
  • A5.61A Biogenic Reefs of Ficopomatus Enigmaticus on Sheltered Upper Infralittoral Rock
    European Red List of Habitats - Marine: Black Sea Habitat Group A5.61a Biogenic reefs of Ficopomatus enigmaticus on sheltered upper infralittoral rock Summary The habitat is present throughout the Black Sea in sheltered waters, with low energy and preferably variable salinity. It is found mainly in harbours, marinas, inlets and lagoons. It is not present in the Sea of Marmara. First records of the habitat are present for all Black Sea countries. All first records occurred during the historic period (pre 1965). Quantitative data for current distribution is available for all countries except Turkey. There are no current records of this habitat from Turkey, but the species has been recorded in 1954. This may be due data gaps. The dates of first records and current distribution data show a clear expansion of this bioengineering species in the Black Sea during the historic period. Synthesis In the EU 28 the habitat type is assessed as Least Concern under Criterion A1, A2a, A2b, A3, B and C/D1. For criteria A1, A2a, A2b and A3 the habitat has expanded its range. This is based in quantitative data. For criteria B the EOO and AOO meet threatened threshold criteria but there are no continuing declines or threatening processes. For criteria C/D1 there has not been a fairly substantial reduction in quality. This is based on expert opinion. In the EU 28+ the habitat type is assessed as Least Concern under Criterion A1, A2a, A2b, A3, B and C/D1. For criteria A1, A2a, A2b and A3 the habitat has expanded its range.
    [Show full text]