The First Book of Moses Called GENESIS INTRODUCTION 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The First Book of Moses Called GENESIS INTRODUCTION 1 The First Book of Moses Called GENESIS INTRODUCTION 1. Title. The Jews designate the book of Genesis according to its word in the Hebrew text, bereshith, “in the beginning.” The Jewish Talmud, however, calls it the “Book of Creation of the World.” The name Genesis, meaning “origin” or “source,” has been adopted by English translations from the LXX, where this term was first used to indicate the contents of the book. Its subtitle, “The First Book of Moses,” was not a part of the original Hebrew text, but was added centuries later. 2. Authorship. Jews and Christians alike have considered Moses, the great lawgiver and leader of the Hebrews at the time of the Exodus, the author of the book of Genesis. This conviction was challenged by pagan opponents a few times in the early Christian period but was never seriously doubted by any Christian or Jew up to about middle of the 18th century. Beginning more than two centuries ago, traditional beliefs and opinions in every field of human thinking were questioned. Men were led to make discoveries in unknown realms and to create inventions which changed much of this world’s way of life. However, the same spirit of inquiry led men of a critical nature to question the authenticity of the Scriptures as the basis of the Christian belief. The book of Genesis was the first book subjected to a critical examination in this modern age, and that examination started the era of higher criticism of the Bible. In 1753, a French court physician, Jean Astruc, published a book, Conjectures, in which he contended that the different names of the Godhead occurring in Genesis show that the book is a collection of various source materials. Astruc retained Moses as the collector of these sources and compiler of the book, but his followers soon disposed of Moses as the editor of Genesis. Critical-minded theologians have worked for more than two centuries to separate the supposed sources of Genesis and assign them to different authors, or at least to periods in which they were supposedly composed, gathered, changed, edited, and finally put together in one book. Adhering to these critical views, the scholars agreed on one great principle; namely, that the book consists of many documents of different value, authorship, and time of origin. However, they differ widely in their opinions concerning which parts are to be attributed to a certain period and which to another. The great variance in views of the different critical schools shows how unsound the foundation of their hypotheses is. The fallacy of many critical arguments has been revealed by the archeological discoveries of the last hundred years. Critics have had to change their theories and statements continually. Nevertheless many of them retain their rejection of a Mosaic authorship of Genesis for various reasons, of which a few will be enumerated here. a. The use of three different names of God, with one name apparently preferred in a certain section and a different name in another, allegedly shows that more than one author is responsible for the composition of the book. Hence, some critical scholars have held that those sections where the name Yahweh (Heb. YHWH or JHWH), “Jehovah,” is frequently used were written by an author they call the Jahvist, abbreviated J; sections using principally the name ’Elohim, “God,” by a man they designate as the Elohist, abbreviated E. Other ancient authors who supposedly worked on Genesis were a priestly writer (P), an editor or redactor (R), and others. b. The many repetitions of stories contained in the book show, according to critical scholars, that parallel sources were used and crudely blended together into one narrative by a later editor, who was unable to hide the fact that he had used material of various origins. c. Conditions reflected in the stories of Genesis allegedly do not fit into the periods described, but into much later times. d. Place names of a much later period are given to localities when their earlier names had been different. e. The traditions about the Creation, the Flood, and the patriarchs as they existed in ancient Babylon are so similar to the Biblical record of them that most modern theologians assert the Hebrew writers borrowed these stories from the Babylonians during the Exile and edited them in a monotheistic style to make them inoffensive to their Hebrew readers. The conservative Christian cannot agree with these views for the following reasons: a. He sees that the sacred names for God, Lord, and Jehovah are used more or less indiscriminately throughout the Hebrew Bible and do not indicate different authors, as the critics maintain. The LXX and the most ancient Hebrew Bible manuscripts, including the recently discovered Isaiah scroll, show that the name “God” found in a certain passage in one copy is given in another manuscript as “Lord” or “Jehovah,” and vice versa. b. Repetitions frequently found in narratives are no sure indication of different sources for a given literary work. The defenders of the unity of the Mosaic books have shown by many non-Biblical examples that similar repetitions are found in various ancient literary works of one and the same author, and also in modern works. c. An increased knowledge of ancient history and conditions has revealed that the author of Genesis was well informed about the times he describes, and that the account of the patriarchs fits exactly into the setting of their time. d. Place names have been modernized in certain cases by copyists to enable their readers to follow the narrative. e. The fact that the Babylonians had traditions to some extent similar to the Hebrew records is no proof that one nation borrowed from the other, but finds its explanation in a common origin for both records. The inspired book of Genesis conveys divinely imparted information in an elevated and pure form, whereas the Babylonian records narrate the same events in a debased pagan setting. It is not the purpose of this introduction to refute the many claims of the higher critics made in support of their theories. It is more important to note the evidence for Mosaic authorship. The author of Exodus must have been the author of Genesis, because the second book of the Pentateuch is a continuation of the first, and evidently manifests the same spirit and intention. Inasmuch as the authorship of the book of Exodus is clearly attested by Christ Himself, who called it the “Book of Moses,” (Mark 12:26), the preceding volume, Genesis, must also have been written by Moses. The use of Egyptian words and expressions and the minute acquaintance with Egyptian life and manners displayed in the history of Joseph harmonize with the education and experience of Moses. Although the evidence in favor of a Mosaic origin of Genesis is less explicit and direct than that for the subsequent books of the Pentateuch, the linguistic peculiarities common to all five books of Moses mark it as work of one author, and the testimony of the New Testament indicates that he wrote under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. The testimony of Jesus Christ, who quoted from several texts in the book of Genesis, is a clear indication that He considered the book as part of Holy Scripture. In quoting Gen. 1:27 and 2:24 Jesus used the introductory formula, “Have ye not read” (Matt. 19:4, 5), indicating that these quotations contained truth that was still binding and valid. The context of the narrative (Mark 10:2–9) relating Jesus’ dispute with the Pharisees about the divine sanction of divorce makes it clear that He attributed to Moses the quotations taken from Genesis. When His antagonists asked Him whether they had a right to divorce their wives, Jesus parried with the question, “What did Moses command you?” In their reply the Pharisees referred to a provision made by Moses, found in Deut. 24:1–4, a passage from the fifth book of the Pentateuch. To this Christ replied that Moses had given them this precept because of the hardness of their heart, but that the earlier provisions had been different, and supported His statement by two other quotations from Moses (Gen. 1:27; 2:24). On several other occasions Christ alluded to events described only in the book of Genesis, revealing that he considered it an accurate historical record (see Luke 17:26–29; John 8:37; etc.). The numerous quotations from Genesis that are found in the writings of the apostles show clearly that they were convinced that Moses wrote the book and that it was inspired (see Rom. 4:17; Gal. 3:8; 4:30; Heb. 4:4; James 2:23). In view of this evidence the Christian may confidently believe that Moses was the author of the book of Genesis. Ellen G. White says of Moses’ sojourn in Midian: “Here, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, he wrote the book of Genesis” (PP 251). 3. Historical Setting. The book of Genesis was written about 1,500 years before Christ (GC v), while the Hebrews were in bondage in Egypt. It contains a sketch of this world’s history covering many centuries. The early chapters of Genesis cannot be placed in a historical setting, as we ordinarily think of history. We have no history of the antediluvian world, except that written by Moses. We have no archeological records, only the mute and often obscure testimony of the fossils. After the Flood the case is different. The archeologist’s spade has brought to light many records of the people, their customs, and forms of government during the period covered in the later chapters of Genesis.
Recommended publications
  • Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Maxwell Institute Publications 2011 Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown Andrew C. Skinner D. Morgan Davis Carl Griffin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi Part of the Religious Education Commons Recommended Citation Skinner, Andrew C.; Davis, D. Morgan; and Griffin,a C rl, "Bountiful Harvest: Essays in Honor of S. Kent Brown" (2011). Maxwell Institute Publications. 17. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/mi/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maxwell Institute Publications by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. bountiful harvest bountiful harvest essays in honor of s. kent brown Edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin Cover design by Stephen Hales Creative, Inc. Frontispiece by Mark A. Philbrick Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University Provo, UT 84602 maxwellinstitute.byu.edu © 2011 The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bountiful harvest : essays in honor of S. Kent Brown / edited by Andrew C. Skinner, D. Morgan Davis, and Carl Griffin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8425-2804-7 (alk. paper) 1. Theology. 2. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I. Brown, S. Kent. II. Skinner, Andrew C., 1951- III.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham – Father of Faith
    Abraham – Father Of Faith an exposition by John Edmiston consisting of 34 Eternity Daily Bible Studies © Copyright, AIBI-International 2006, this book may be freely reproduced for non- profit ministry purposes but may not be sold in any way. Abraham's Family Background Genesis 11:25-32 MKJV And after he fathered Terah, Nahor lived a hundred and nineteen years. And he fathered sons and daughters. (26) And Terah lived seventy years and fathered Abram, Nahor and Haran. (27) Now these are the generations of Terah: Terah fathered Abram, Nahor and Haran. And Haran fathered Lot. (28) And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his birth, in Ur of the Chaldeans. (29) And Abram and Nahor took wives for themselves. The name of Abram's wife was Sarai. And the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah. (30) But Sarai was barren. She had no child. (31) And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot, the son of Haran, his son's son, and Sarai his daughter-in-law, his son Abram's wife. And he went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan. And they came to Haran and lived there. (32) And the days of Terah were two hundred and five years. And Terah died in Haran. Abraham was the first real monotheist and as such is a pivotal figure in Judaism, Islam and Christianity. The Jews call Abraham “Father Abraham”, the Muslims “the Imam to the nations”, and the Christians “Father of Faith”.
    [Show full text]
  • Tzemah Yoreh
    Why did Abraham Kill Isaac - Tzemah Yoreh Isaac’s Sacrifice “O, do Thou regard the ashes of Father Isaac heaped up on top of the altar, and deal with Thy children in accordance with the Mercy Attribute” (Supplication prior to sounding the ram's horn, Heidenheim Mahzor, Vienna, 1827) Isaac said to him: "Father have no fears. May it be His will that one quarter of my blood Serve as an atonement for all Israel. (Bereshit Rabbati, ed. Albeck, p. 90) Were there sexual relations? Genesis 12:14 When Abram entered Egypt the Egyptians saw that the woman was very beautiful. 15 When the officials of Pharaoh saw her, they praised her to Pharaoh. And the woman was taken into Pharaoh’s house. 16 And for her sake he dealt well with Abram; and he had sheep, oxen, male donkeys, male and female slaves, female donkeys, and camels. 17 But the Lord afflicted Pharaoh and his house with great plagues because of Sarai, Abram’s wife. 18 So Pharaoh called Abram, and said, ‘What is this you have done to me? Why did you not tell me that she was your wife? 19 Why did you say, “She is my sister”, so that I took her for my wife? Now then, here is your wife; take her, and be gone. Isaac’s Paternity in the Midrash "[These are the generations of Isaac the son of Abraham], Abraham begat Isaac (Gen 25:19)” – For people would have said that Isaac was the son of Abimelech. Thus, the Holy One, blessed be He, made Isaac's face similar to Abraham's so that it would be known that Isaac was Abraham's son and not Abimelech's son.
    [Show full text]
  • WORD BIBLICAL COMMENTARY VOLUME 6B Deuteronomy 21:10–34:12 DUANE L
    WORD BIBLICAL COMMENTARY VOLUME 6B Deuteronomy 21:10–34:12 DUANE L. CHRISTENSEN General Editors Bruce M. Metzger † David A. Hubbard † Glenn W. Barker Old Testament Editor John D. W. Watts New Testament Editor Ralph P. Martin WORD BOOKS, PUBLISHER • DALLAS, TEXAS Word Biblical Commentary Deuteronomy 21:10–34:12 Copyright © 2002 by Thomas Nelson, inc. All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Word biblical commentary. Includes bibliographies. 1. Bible—Commentaries—Collected works. BS491.2.W67 220.7ʹ7 81-71768 ISBN 0-8499-1032-3 (v. 6B) AACR2 Scripture quotations in the body of the commentary, unless otherwise indicated, are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright 1946 (renewed 1973), 1956, and © 1971 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the USA and are used by permission. The author’s own translation of the text appears in italic type under the heading Translation. To Casper J. Labuschagne, , ס וֹ פֵ ר colleague, friend, and modern for his work on the numerical composition of the Bible Table of Contents Editorial Preface Author’s Preface Abbreviations MAIN BIBLIOGRAPHY Chronological Bibliography of Commentaries on Deuteronomy Monographs and Selected Books on Deuteronomy Festschriften (with significant articles on Deuteronomy) INTRODUCTION Text and Versions of Deuteronomy Review of Critical Research Detailed Outline of Deuteronomy EXCURSUSES Law, Poetry, and Music in Ancient Israel Deuteronomy in the Canonical Process The Triennial Cycle of Torah Readings in Palestinian Judaism The Numeruswechsel in Deuteronomy Deuteronomy as a Numerical Composition Travel Notices in Deut 1–3 and 31–34 Holy War as Celebrated Event in Ancient Israel TEXT AND COMMENTARY READING 1: The Eisodus into the Promised Land under Moses (1:1–3:22) A.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 12-50
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Brief Explanation About the Technical Resources Used in this Commentary Series .......... i Brief Definitions of Hebrew Grammatical Forms Which Impact Exegesis................. iii Abbreviations Used in This Commentary.......................................... ix The Old Testament as History................................................... xi OT Historiography Compared with Contemporary Near Eastern Cultures................ xv Genre and Interpretation: Old Testament Narrative.................................. xvi A Word From the Author: How This Commentary Can Help You..................... xviii A Guide to Good Bible Reading ................................................ xx Introduction to Genesis 11:24-12:20 ...............................................1 Genesis 12 ................................................................ 4 Genesis 13 ............................................................... 23 Genesis 14 ............................................................... 31 Genesis 15 ............................................................... 44 Genesis 16 ............................................................... 66 Genesis 17 ............................................................... 73 Genesis 18 ............................................................... 83 Genesis 19 ............................................................... 95 Genesis 20 .............................................................. 105 Genesis 21 .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Handbooks Bible Classes
    HANDBOOKS FOR BIBLE CLASSES AND PRIVATE STUDENTS. EDITED BY PROFESSOR MARCUS DODS, D.D., AND REV, ALEXANDER WHYTE, D.D. CENESIS,-MARCUS DODS, D.D. EDINBURGH: 1'. & T. CLARK, 38 GEORGE STREET. PR1NT.ED DY MORRISON AND 018B FOR T. & T. CLARK, EDINBURGH, LOlli~N: SIMPKIN. MARSHALL, HAMILTON. KENT, AND CO. LIMITED NEW YORK: CHARL"l<~S SGR!BNER 8 SONS. TORONTO Z THE WlLLARD TRACT DEPO~ITORY. THE BOOI{ OF GENESIS. fflltitb lintrolmction anb N otcs BY MARCUS DODS. D.D., rROFKSSOR OF .EXEGETICAL THEOLOGYJ NEW COLLBGB, &DINBVRGH. EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, 38 GEORGE STREET. THE BOOK OF GENESIS. INTRODUCTION. WHEN you go to see a picture, the artist is very careful to set yo.. where the right light may fall upon it ; otherwise its beauties are blurred, its figures indistinct. And unless we stand in a writer's point of view, what was perfectly lucid and definite to him is confused or vague to us. Without understanding a writer's aim, we may derive much information from his book ; but we shall certainly miss many of his points, and be at a distinct disadvantage as readers. It is not without reason, therefore, that among_ the first questions we put about a book is this, What is the author's aim ? This question cannot always be answered from one perusal, someti)lles not from many perusals. And hence it has become the familiar custom of literary men· to introduce their books to the public by means of a preface, in which they indicate their object in publishing, and put their readers in an attitude of intelligence towards what is to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interpretation of the English Bible
    AN INTERPRETATION OF THE ENGLISH BIBLE BY B. H. CARROLL Late President of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas Edited by J. B. Cranfill BAKER BOOK HOUSE Grand Rapids, Michigan New and complete edition Copyright 1948, Broadman Press Reprinted by Baker Book House with permission of Broadman Press ISBN: 0-8010-2344-0 VOLUME 1 GENESIS CONTENTS Publisher’s Preface General Forward I Introduction to an "Interpretation of the English Bible" II Introductory Studies – The Old Testament III Introductory Studies – The Pentateuch IV Creation – Part One (1:1-25) V Creation – Part Two (1:26-2:3) VI Man in Paradise (2:4-25) VII The Angels VIII The Fall of Man (Chapter 3) IX Sin X Cain and Abel (Chapter 4) XI Chronology from Adam to Noah (Chapter 5) XII Enoch – His Translation (Chapter 5) XIII Causes of the Deluge (6:1-22) XIV Lessons of the Flood (Chapter 7) XV God's Covenant with Noah (Chapters 8-9) XVI Origin of Nations and Languages (10:1-11:9) XVII Distribution and Territories of the Nations (10:1-11:9) XVIII Generations of Shem and Terah (11:10-32) XIX The Call and Migration of Abraham (Chapters 12-13) XX The Covenants with Abraham (Part One) (12:1-3; 15:1-21; 17:1-1 4 ; 22:1-19) XXI The Covenants with Abraham (Part Two) (12:1-3; 15:1-21; 17:1-14; 22:1-19) XXII Abraham, Lot, and Melchizedek (Chapter 14) XXIII Abraham's Conversion (Part One) (Chapter 15) XXIV Abraham's Conversion (Part Two) (15:1-19:28) XXV The Life of Abraham (Concluded) (19:29-25:18) XXVI Isaac and Jacob (25:19-28:9) XXVII Jacob's Conversion and Life in Haran (28:10-31:55) XXVIII Jacob's Meeting with Esau (32:1-34:31) XXIX Jacob, Joseph, and Others (Chapters 35-41) XXX Joseph in Egypt (Chapters 42-45) XXXI Jacob and Family Migrate to Egypt (46:1-47:27) XXXII The Last Days of Jacob and Joseph (47:27-50) PUBLISHER'S PREFACE At the time of its publication this set was acclaimed to constitute "the greatest commentary on the English Bible ever published" (Baptist and Reflector).
    [Show full text]
  • Dispensational Distinctions
    DISPENSATIONAL DISTINCTIONS THE PRIMAL REGENERATION: GENESIS CHAPTERS 4-50 Lesson #1 Introduction: 1. The Bible can be studied: a. Doctrinally. The basic fundamentals concerning God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, Sin, Salvation, Sanctification, Glorification, the Resurrections, The Second Coming of Christ, etc. b. Dispensationally. God‘s progressive revelation during the ages – marking additions and changes in the progress of revelation. c. Devotionally. Truth is not only for the mind; it is also for the heart. We are to be comforted, strengthened and encouraged. 2. Definition: The word ―dispensation‖ is the English translation of the Greek word oikonomia. It is made up of two words: oikos – house, and nema – to dispense or manage. Hence, ―house management,‖ and administration or stewardship. It is translated ―stewardship‖ in Luke 16:2-4; ―dispensation‖ in I Corinthians 9:17; Ephesians 1:10; 3:2; Colossians 1:25; ―fellowship‖ in Ephesians 3:9; and ―Godly living‖ in I Timothy 1:4. 3. Inspiration of the Scriptures: It is a must in any Biblical study to be absolutely sure about the inspiration of the Scriptures in the original languages. This inspiration is both verbal, extending to the very words and letters, and also plenary, extending to all the books of the Bible or canon. I Timothy 3:16 is the classic passage on inspiration. 4. ―Rightly dividing the Word of Truth,‖ This is the second fundamental of Biblical interpretation. II Timothy 2:15 is the classic passage. What was true under the Dispensation of Law may be false under the Dispensation of Grace. Romans and Galatians reveal this.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Think the New KJV Is the Same As the 1611 King James Bible, B
    Is the NKJV the inerrant and 100% true Bible? Not a Chance! If you think the New KJV is the same as the 1611 King James Bible, but with more modern English, then I hope this little study will reveal to you that they are not at all the same in hundreds of verses. Both cannot equally be the perfect and inerrant words of God at the same time when they are so different from each other. As a side note, some mistakenly think the NKJV is basically the same as the King James Bible but with all those "thee"s and "ye"s removed and replaced with the generic "you". It is not, and all those "thee"s and "ye"s are actually there for a good reason and are far more accurate. The NKJV's generic "you" ends us causing confusion and lacks accuracy in numerous passages - See this article for an explanation of the important differences between "thee, thine, thou" and "you and your" - http://brandplucked.webs.com/theeandye.htm The first error in the NKJV is found in the first verse. "In the beginning God created the HEAVEN and the earth." Notice it is the heaven - singular. This is the reading of the King James Bible, Wycliffe, 1395, Tyndale 1534 (he translated part of the O.T. before his death), Coverdale 1535, the Great Bible (Cranmer) 1540, Matthew's Bible (John Rogers) 1549, Bishops' Bible 1568, the Geneva Bible 1587, Lesser Bible 1853, Noyes Translation 1869, the Revised Version 1885, the Jewish Pub. Society translation of 1917 and Hebrew Publishing Company of 1936, Webster's 1833 translation, the Diodati and modern Italian Diodati 1991 -"Nel principio DIO creò i cieli e la terra.", the Spanish Reina Valera Gómez of 2004 - "En el principio creó Dios el cielo y la tierra.", Douay 1950, 21st Century KJV 1994, the Bible in Basic English of 1965, the Douay-Rheims bible -"In the beginning God created heaven, and earth", the New Jerusalem Bible 1985, the Third Millennium Bible 1998 and the 2009 Catholic Public Domain Version.
    [Show full text]
  • 1St Corinthians 11 & the Christian Use Of
    CCCoooveredveredvered GGlloryory Glory __________________________________________________ ST 1 CORINTHIANS 11 & THE CHRISTIAN USE OF HEADCOVERINGS ________________________ DAVID PHILLIPS Available Online At bitly.com/CoveredGlory Revision 03.08.15 CCOVEREDOVERED GGLORYLORY 1ST CORINTHIANS 11 & THE CHRISTIAN USE OF HEADCOVERINGS CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION 1. HEADCOVERINGS IN SCRIPTURE . 1 2. WHAT IS THE “HEADCOVERING”? . 3 3. NATURAL HAIR LENGTH: CULTURAL OR UNIVERSAL? . 8 ST 4. HEADCOVERINGS IN 1 CENTURY CULTURE . 9 5. SCRIPTURE'S REASONS FOR THE HEADCOVERING . 10 6. CHRISTIAN HEADCOVERINGS FOR TODAY? . 21 A. APPENDIX: HEADCOVERING THROUGHOUT CHRISTIAN HISTORY . 34 B. APPENDIX: KEY TERMS & PHRASES . 55 ST C. APPENDIX: FURTHER DETAILS ON 1 CENTURY CULTURE . 67 COPYRIGHT 2011-2014 PERMISSION FOR COPYING IS FREELY PROVIDED UNDER THE “CREATIVE COMMONS / ATTRIBUTION 3.0 LICENSE” All Scripture quotations, unless otherwise noted, are from the New American Standard Bible® (NASB). Copyright © 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation (www.lockman.org) Used by permission. Scripture identified as “NIV” is taken from the Holy Bible, New International Version. Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan. All rights reserved. Covered Glory iii Ω PREFACE The Apostle Paul: “I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying disgraces his head. But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head... For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man..
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 20: Abraham’S Relapse Into Sin Abraham’S Relapse Into Sin Genesis 20
    Life of Abraham: Genesis 12-25 Genesis 20: Abraham’s Relapse Into Sin Abraham’s Relapse into Sin Genesis 20 Abraham’s Hasty Decision Genesis 20:1-7 Abraham Feared the World: Genesis 20:1-2 Abraham’s Journey South Once again we find Abraham going south, and like the previous time, there is no indication of the LORD’S direction. Why did he go? The answer remains a mystery but he may have wanted to leave the area after the destruction of the valley, he might have looked to transact business, or he just felt like traveling. It is important to remember that he did not leave the land promised him, though he went close to the boundaries (Genesis 15:18). Whatever the case may be, he struggled with his faith and was reprimanded. He chose to dwell between Kadesh and Shur, then traveled to Gerar, which was a prominent Philistine city located on a well-traveled trade route. The Philistines were descendants of Ham (Genesis 10:14). They were from Egypt and migrated north to the coastal area of Palestine. Abimelech was the King of Gerar. Abraham’s Deception Abraham and Sarah previously decided to present themselves as brother and sister in hopes of protecting Abraham. This scheme backfired in Egypt, and they were preserved by God’s grace and mercy. But old habits are hard to break, and Abraham and Sarah held on to their little plan of deception. Any form of deception is a lie and a sin (James 4:17). Evidently Abraham feared for his life as they neared Gerar, so they returned to their old ways and introduced themselves as brother and sister.
    [Show full text]
  • The Monster Enters: COVID-19, Avian Flu and the Plagues of Capitalism
    All rights information: [email protected] Visit our website at www.orbooks.com First printing 2020 Published by OR Books, New York and London © 2020 Mike Davis Published by arrangement with The New Press, New York, NY All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher, except brief passages for review purposes. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. Typeset by Lapiz Digital Services. Printed by Bookmobile, USA, and CPI, UK. paperback ISBN 978-1-68219-303-7• ebook ISBN 978-1-68219-400-3 for Roisin, my light Lo, when the wall is fallen shall it not be said unto you, Where is the daubing wherewith ye have daubed it? Ezekiel (xiii, 3, 10–12) CONTENTS Introduction: The Monster Enters Preface: The Monster at Our Door Chapter 1: The Virulence of Poverty Chapter 2: Birds of Hong Kong Chapter 3: A Messy Story Chapter 4: Pandemic Surprise Chapter 5: The Triangle of Doom Chapter 6: Plague and Profit Chapter 7: Edge of the Abyss Chapter 8: Homeland Insecurity Chapter 9: Structural Contradictions Chapter 10: The Titanic Paradigm Conclusion: Year of the Rooster Notes About the Author INTRODUCTION: THE MONSTER ENTERS I write this in the first week of April 2020, in the eye of the hurricane, so to speak, while bunkered in my garage with innumerable cans of Chef Boyardee, a few pints of Guinness, and some virology textbooks.
    [Show full text]