Response Statement - Griscom’S Arnica

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Response Statement - Griscom’s Arnica December XX, 2015 Common Name: Griscom’s Arnica Scientific Name: Arnica griscomii ssp. griscomii Status assessment by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC): Threatened How the Minister of the Environment intends to respond to the assessment: The Minister of the Environment will forward the COSEWIC assessment of the Griscom’s Arnica to the Governor in Council as soon as possible following completion of the normal consultation period and analysis as appropriate. During the normal consultation period, the Minister of Environment will consult with the governments of Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador, Aboriginal peoples, stakeholders, and the public on whether or not the Griscom’s Arnica should be added to the List of Wildlife Species at Risk (Schedule 1) under the Species at Risk Act as Threatened. Once a species has been assessed by COSEWIC, further steps must be undertaken before it is added to Schedule 1 of the Species at Risk Act. For more information on this process, please view The Species Listing Process Under SARA. Reason(s) for status designation provided by COSEWIC: This mat-forming plant is a Canadian Gulf of St. Lawrence endemic found only on small, isolated calcareous cliffs and limestone barrens of Quebec and the Island of Newfoundland, is increasingly under threat due to habitat shift in response to a changing climate. The instability of some sites increases the threat of a stochastic event that could result in the loss of some small subpopulations. ATV use in limestone barrens is of some concern. Occurrence: Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador Competent Minister(s): Minister of Environment Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency Province(s) and territory (territories) to be consulted: Quebec Newfoundland and Labrador Applicable federal legislation: When the species is found within national parks of Canada or other lands administered by the Parks Canada Agency, it is protected or managed under the Canada National Parks Act or through measures or management tools available to the Parks Canada Agency under other legislation..

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Volume 2
Appendix F Species List Appendix F: Species List F. Species List F.1 Lists The following list and three tables denote the bird, mammal, fish, and plant species known to occur in Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Arctic Refuge, Refuge). F.1.1 Birds of Arctic Refuge A total of 201 bird species have been recorded on Arctic Refuge. This list describes their status and abundance. Many birds migrate outside of the Refuge in the winter, so unless otherwise noted, the information is for spring, summer, or fall. Bird names and taxonomic classification follow American Ornithologists' Union (1998). F.1.1.1 Definitions of classifications used Regions of the Refuge . Coastal Plain – The area between the coast and the Brooks Range. This area is sometimes split into coastal areas (lagoons, barrier islands, and Beaufort Sea) and inland areas (uplands near the foothills of the Brooks Range). Brooks Range – The mountains, valleys, and foothills north and south of the Continental Divide. South Side – The foothills, taiga, and boreal forest south of the Brooks Range. Status . Permanent Resident – Present throughout the year and breeds in the area. Summer Resident – Only present from May to September. Migrant – Travels through on the way to wintering or breeding areas. Breeder – Documented as a breeding species. Visitor – Present as a non-breeding species. * – Not documented. Abundance . Abundant – Very numerous in suitable habitats. Common – Very likely to be seen or heard in suitable habitats. Fairly Common – Numerous but not always present in suitable habitats. Uncommon – Occurs regularly but not always observed because of lower abundance or secretive behaviors.
[Show full text]
NL Writers/Literature – Joan Sullivan (Guest Editor)
Week of August 24 – NL Writers/Literature – Joan Sullivan (guest editor) Wikipedia Needs Assessment – NL Writers/Literature A Selection of Existing Articles to Improve: Megan Gail Coles: Can be expanded Mary Dalton: Can be expanded Stan Dragland: Can be expanded Margaret Duley: Needs more citations Percy Janes: Needs more citations Maura Hanrahan: Needs citations Michael Harrington: Needs citations and can be expanded Kenneth J. Harvey: Needs more citations and a more neutral point of view Andy Jones: Can be expanded and needs more citations Kevin Major: Can be expanded and needs more citations Elisabeth de Mariaffi: Can be expanded Janet McNaughton: Can be expanded George Murray: Needs more citations and can be updated 1 Patrick O’Flaherty: Can be expanded and needs more citations Al Pittman: Needs citations Bill Rowe: Needs more citations Dora Oake Russell: Can be expanded and needs more citations Winterset Award: Can be expanded Russell Wangersky: Needs more citations These lists could also be checked to see if any of the existing articles need expansion, improvement or citations: • Wikipedia’s list on Writers from St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador • Wikipedia’s list on Writers from Newfoundland and Labrador Suggested New Articles to Create: Smokey Elliott (poet) Carol Hobbs (poet) Charis Cotter (YA author) Running the Goat Books & Broadsides Uncle Val, Andy Jones’ fictional character Online Resources on NL Writers/Literature “Literature” in Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador Volume 3, pp. 320-333. Literature – Heritage NL Web Site Poetry Bibliography – Heritage NL Web Site Writers – Heritage NL Web Site Also consult Online Resources with Newfoundland and Labrador Content.
[Show full text]
Griscom's Arnica Arnica Griscomii
COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Griscom’s Arnica Arnica griscomii ssp. griscomii in Canada THREATENED 2014 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2014. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Griscom’s Arnica Arnica griscomii ssp. griscomii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 39 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Michael Burzynski for writing the status report on the Griscom’s Arnica (Arnica griscomii ssp. griscomii) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur lL’arnica de Griscom (Arnica griscomii ssp. griscomii) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Griscom’s Arnica — Photo by M. Burzynski. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014. Catalogue No. CW69-14/709-2015E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-23302-4 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2014 Common name Griscom’s Arnica Scientific name Arnica griscomii ssp. griscomii Status Threatened Reason for designation This mat-forming plant is a Canadian Gulf of St. Lawrence endemic found only on small, isolated calcareous cliffs and limestone barrens of Quebec and the Island of Newfoundland, is increasingly under threat due to habitat shift in response to a changing climate.
[Show full text]
Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8459 !"# $ % !& '((" !()(( * * * + , - . , / , '((", + 0 1# 2, # , 34', 56 , , 70 46"84!855&86(4'8(, - 1# 2 . * 9 10-2 . * . # 9 , * * 1 ! " #! !$ 2 1 2 .8 # * * :# 77 1%&'(2 . !6 '3, + . .8 ) / , ; < * . * ** # , * * * , 09 * . # * * 33 * != , 0- # 9 * * 1, , * 2 . * , 0 * * * * * . * , $ * 0- * % # , # 8 * * * * * * $8> # . * * !' , * * . ** , ? . 0- , +,- # # 7-0 -0 :+' 9 +# $8> ./0) . ) 1 ) 2 * 3) ) .456(7 ) , @ / '((" 700 !=5!8='!& 70 46"84!855&86(4'8( ) ))) 8"&54 1 );; ,/,; A B ) ))) 8"&542 List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
[Show full text]
Waterton Lakes National Park • Common Name(Order Family Genus Species)
Waterton Lakes National Park Flora • Common Name(Order Family Genus species) Monocotyledons • Arrow-grass, Marsh (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin palustris) • Arrow-grass, Seaside (Najadales Juncaginaceae Triglochin maritima) • Arrowhead, Northern (Alismatales Alismataceae Sagittaria cuneata) • Asphodel, Sticky False (Liliales Liliaceae Triantha glutinosa) • Barley, Foxtail (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Hordeum jubatum) • Bear-grass (Liliales Liliaceae Xerophyllum tenax) • Bentgrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Podagrostis humilis) • Bentgrass, Creeping (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis stolonifera) • Bentgrass, Green (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Calamagrostis stricta) • Bentgrass, Spike (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Agrostis exarata) • Bluegrass, Alpine (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa alpina) • Bluegrass, Annual (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa annua) • Bluegrass, Arctic (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arctica) • Bluegrass, Plains (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa arida) • Bluegrass, Bulbous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa bulbosa) • Bluegrass, Canada (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa compressa) • Bluegrass, Cusick's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa cusickii) • Bluegrass, Fendler's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa fendleriana) • Bluegrass, Glaucous (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa glauca) • Bluegrass, Inland (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa interior) • Bluegrass, Fowl (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa palustris) • Bluegrass, Patterson's (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pattersonii) • Bluegrass, Kentucky (Poales Poaceae/Gramineae Poa pratensis) • Bluegrass, Sandberg's (Poales
[Show full text]
Plant Communities of a Tussock Tundra Landscape in the Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska
Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 843-866, 1994 © IAVS; Opulus Press Uppsala. Printed in Sweden - Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape, Alaska - 843 Plant communities of a tussock tundra landscape in the Brooks Range Foothills, Alaska Walker, Marilyn D.*, Walker, Donald A. & Auerbach, Nancy A. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0450, USA; *Fax +1 303 492 6388; E-mail [email protected] Abstract. We present the first vegetation analysis from the to the physiognomy of the tussock-forming sedge Arctic Foothills of northern Alaska according to the Braun- Eriophorum vaginatum. The range of E. vaginatum Blanquet approach. The data are from the Imnavait Creek and extends throughout the Arctic, except for the eastern half Toolik Lake regions. We focus on associations of dry and of North America and Greenland. Tussock tundra has mesic upland surfaces and moderate snow accumulation sites; been described in many areas of northern Alaska (e.g. other upland plant communities, i.e. those of blockfields, non- Hanson 1951, 1953; Churchill 1955; Bliss 1956, 1962; sorted circles, and water tracks, are briefly described. Sum- mary floristic information is presented in a synoptic table. Spetzman 1959; Douglas & Tedrow 1960; Johnson et al. Five associations and 15 community types are tentatively 1966; Lambert 1968; D.A. Walker et al. 1982). Some of placed into seven existing syntaxonomical classes. The com- these studies have touched on the variation that occurs munity descriptions are arranged according to habitat: dry within tussock tundra with respect to topography, hy- exposed acidic sites, moist acidic shallow snowbeds, moist drology and soils, but there remains a general impression non-acidic snowbeds, moist acidic uplands, and moist non- that tussock tundra is a uniform vegetation type that acidic uplands.
[Show full text]
Ssacannualactivityreport2011-12
Annual Activity Report Species Status Advisory Committee 2011-2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 2 Message from the Chairperson.................................................................................................... 3 Overview of the Committee.......................................................................................................... 4 a. Key Statistics ...................................................................................................................... 4 b. Representation..................................................................................................................... 4 c. Description of Revenues and Expenditures ........................................................................ 4 d. Lines of Business ................................................................................................................ 5 e. Mandate............................................................................................................................... 5 f. Vision.................................................................................................................................. 5 g. Mission................................................................................................................................ 5 Highlights and Accomplishments ...............................................................................................
[Show full text]
CR 97-2 Pages
A Floristic Inventory and Spatial 97-23 Database for Fort Wainwright, Interior Alaska Charles Racine, Robert Lichvar, Barbara Murray, October 1997 Gerald Tande, Robert Lipkin, and Michael Duffy SPECIAL REPORT Abstract: An inventory of the vascular and ground-in- Flats and associated wetlands, 4) the upland buttes and habiting cryptogam flora of Fort Wainwright, in interior Blair Lakes area in Tanana Flats, and 5) the floodplains Alaska, was conducted during the summer of 1995 to of the Tanana and Chena Rivers. Over 100 sites were support land management needs related to the impact visited, with habitats ranging from very dry south-facing of training. Primary plant collecting, identification and slopes to forest, floodplains, wetlands, and alpine tun- verification were conducted by the Alaska Natural Heri- dra. tage Program and the University of Alaska Museum. Vascular collections represented 491 species (includ- The work was supervised and the data compiled into a ing subspecies and varieties), included about 26% of geographic information system by the USA Cold Re- Alaska’s vascular flora, and are considered to be rela- gions Research and Engineering Laboratory and the tively complete. The cryptogam collections included 219 USA Waterways Experiment Station. species, representing 92 mosses, 117 lichens, and 10 Fort Wainwright covers 370,450 hectares (915,000 liverworts. The flora is characteristic of the circumpolar acres); it was divided into five areas: 1) the valleys of boreal forest and wetlands of both North America and a cantonment area of base facilities, 2) the slopes and Eurasia, but it also contains alpine and dry-grassland alpine areas of the Yukon–Tanana Uplands, 3) Tanana and steppe species.
[Show full text]
Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Species Lists from Npspecies As of September 30, 2001 for Denali National Park and Preserve
Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Species Lists From NPSpecies as of September 30, 2001 For Denali National Park and Preserve A Supplemental Report to the Final Report – Compilation of Existing Species Data In Alaska’s National Parks By Julia Lenz, Tracey Gotthardt, Mike Kelly, and Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage For National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program Alaska Region September 30, 2001 In Partial Completion of Cooperative Agreement #9910-00-013 University of Alaska Anchorage Environment and Natural Resources Institute 707 A St. Anchorage, Alaska 9950 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES LIST ........................................................................ 2 FISH SPECIES LIST ................................................................................................ 63 BIRD SPECIES LIST................................................................................................ 64 MAMMAL SPECIES LIST ...................................................................................... 72 AMPHIBIAN SPECIES LIST................................................................................... 75 i INTRODUCTION This report contains species lists for vascular plant and vertebrate species entered in the National Park Service’s NPSpecies database, by the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP) for Denali
[Show full text]
FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords
FEIS Citation Retrieval System Keywords 29,958 entries as KEYWORD (PARENT) Descriptive phrase AB (CANADA) Alberta ABEESC (PLANTS) Abelmoschus esculentus, okra ABEGRA (PLANTS) Abelia Ã— grandiflora [chinensis Ã— uniflora], glossy abelia ABERT'S SQUIRREL (MAMMALS) Sciurus alberti ABERT'S TOWHEE (BIRDS) Pipilo aberti ABIABI (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella abietina, abietinella moss ABIALB (PLANTS) Abies alba, European silver fir ABIAMA (PLANTS) Abies amabilis, Pacific silver fir ABIBAL (PLANTS) Abies balsamea, balsam fir ABIBIF (PLANTS) Abies bifolia, subalpine fir ABIBRA (PLANTS) Abies bracteata, bristlecone fir ABICON (PLANTS) Abies concolor, white fir ABICONC (ABICON) Abies concolor var. concolor, white fir ABICONL (ABICON) Abies concolor var. lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIDUR (PLANTS) Abies durangensis, Coahuila fir ABIES SPP. (PLANTS) firs ABIETINELLA SPP. (BRYOPHYTES) Abietinella spp., mosses ABIFIR (PLANTS) Abies firma, Japanese fir ABIFRA (PLANTS) Abies fraseri, Fraser fir ABIGRA (PLANTS) Abies grandis, grand fir ABIHOL (PLANTS) Abies holophylla, Manchurian fir ABIHOM (PLANTS) Abies homolepis, Nikko fir ABILAS (PLANTS) Abies lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILASA (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. arizonica, corkbark fir ABILASB (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. bifolia, subalpine fir ABILASL (ABILAS) Abies lasiocarpa var. lasiocarpa, subalpine fir ABILOW (PLANTS) Abies lowiana, Rocky Mountain white fir ABIMAG (PLANTS) Abies magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGM (ABIMAG) Abies magnifica var. magnifica, California red fir ABIMAGS (ABIMAG) Abies
[Show full text]
The Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Citation Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
[Show full text]
Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Vascular Plant Inventory 2001 Field Season Annual Progress Report
LAKE CLARK NATIONAL PARK AND PRESERVE VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY 2001 FIELD SEASON ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT Robert Lipkin Alaska Natural Heritage Program University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street Anchorage, AK 99501 NPS Report: NPS/AKR/SWAN/NRTR-2002/01 November 2002 Southwest Alaska Network Inventory and Monitoring Program Cooperative Agreement Number 1443CA991000013 Funding Source: National Park Service, SW Alaska Network 2001 Lake Clark NP Vascular Plant Inventory- Southwest Alaska Network ABSTRACT As part of the Inventory and Monitoring effort of the National Park Service’s Southwest Alaska Network, the Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP) conducted an inventory of the vascular plants in Lake Clark National Park and Preserve. The primary goal of the inventory was to document the occurrence of 90% of the vascular plant taxa that are expected to occur in the park. Secondary goals included describing the distribution and abundance of rare taxa and other species of special concern and documenting the general distribution of vascular plants across the ecoregions of the park. We used existing collections and records to establish a list of plant species known or expected to occur in the park and we plotted the known species and collection localites on a geographic information system along with topograhic maps, park ecoregions, and aerial photography. Using this information and additional data on geology, vegetation and landforms we selected sampling sites to assure adequate representation in park ecoregions while also targetting suspected floristic hotspots. Crews of 2-4 botanists visited the sites collecting species new to the park or ecoregion or otherwise of interest for the flora of the park.
[Show full text]