DOCSLIB.ORG

Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Acts of Union 1707 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Acts of Union 1707 from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 17/10/2014 Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Acts of Union 1707 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Acts of Union were two Acts of Parliament: the [1] Union with Scotland Act 1706 passed by the Union with Scotland Act 1706 Parliament of England, and the Union with England Act passed in 1707 by the Parliament of Scotland. They put into effect the terms of the Treaty of Union that had been agreed on 22 July 1706, following negotiation between commissioners representing the parliaments of the two countries. The Acts joined the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of Scotland (previously separate states with separate legislatures, but with the same monarch) into a single, united Parliament of England kingdom named "Great Britain".[2] Long title An Act for a Union of the Two Kingdoms of England and Scotland The two countries had shared a monarch since the Chapter 6 Anne c. 11 Union of the Crowns in 1603, when King James VI of Scotland inherited the English throne from his double Territorial Kingdom of England (inc. Wales) first cousin twice removed, Queen Elizabeth I. extent Although described as a Union of Crowns, until 1707 Status: Current legislation there were in fact two separate Crowns resting on the same head (as opposed to the implied creation of a Revised text of statute as amended single Crown and a single Kingdom, exemplified by (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/6/11) the later Kingdom of Great Britain). There had been three attempts in 1606, 1667, and 1689 to unite the Union with England Act 1707 two countries by Acts of Parliament, but it was not until the early 18th century that both political establishments came to support the idea, albeit for different reasons. The Acts took effect on 1 May 1707. On this date, the Scottish Parliament and the English Parliament united to form the Parliament of Great Britain, based in the Palace of Westminster in London, the home of the Parliament of Scotland English Parliament.[3] Hence, the Acts are referred to Long title Act Ratifying and Approving the as the Union of the Parliaments. On the Union, the Treaty of Union of the Two Kingdoms historian Simon Schama said "What began as a hostile of SCOTLAND and ENGLAND merger, would end in a full partnership in the most powerful going concern in the world ... it was one of Chapter Anne c. 7 the most astonishing transformations in European Territorial Kingdom of Scotland history."[4] extent Status: Current legislation Revised text of statute as amended Contents (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1707/7) 1 Historical background Documents relevant to personal 1.1 Previous attempts at union and legislative unions of the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_Union_1707 1/19 17/10/2014 Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 1.1.1 Early Stuart union countries of the United Kingdom 1.1.2 Union during the Treaty of Windsor 1175 interregnum Treaty of York 1237 1.1.3 Later attempts Treaty of Perth 1266 1.2 Treaty and passage of the Acts of Treaty of Montgomery 1267 1707 Treaty of Aberconwy 1277 2 Political motivations Statute of Rhuddlan 1284 2.1 English perspective Treaty of Edinburgh–N'hampton 1328 2.2 Scottish perspective Treaty of Berwick 1357 2.3 Irish perspective Poynings' Law 1495 3 Provisions of the Acts Laws in Wales Acts 1535–1542 4 Criticisms Crown of Ireland Act 1542 5 300th anniversary Treaty of Edinburgh 1560 6 Scottish Voting Records Union of the Crowns 1603 7 See also Union of England and Scotland Act 1603 8 Notes Act of Settlement 1701 9 References Act of Security 1704 10 External links Alien Act 1705 Treaty of Union 1706 Acts of Union 1707 Historical background Wales and Berwick Act 1746 Irish Constitution 1782 Previous attempts at union Acts of Union 1800 Government of Ireland Act 1920 England and Scotland were separate states for several Anglo-Irish Treaty 1921 centuries before eventual union, and English attempts to take over Scotland by military force in the late 13th Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act 1927 and early 14th centuries were ultimately unsuccessful N. Ireland (Temporary Provisions) Act 1972 (see the Wars of Scottish Independence). The first Northern Ireland Assembly 1973 attempts at Union surrounded the foreseen unification N. Ireland Constitution Act 1973 of the Royal lines of Scotland and England. In pursuing the Scottish throne in the 1560s, Mary, Northern Ireland Act 1998 Queen of Scots pledged herself to a peaceful union Government of Wales Act 1998 between the two kingdoms.[5] Scotland Act 1998 Government of Wales Act 2006 England and Scotland were ruled by the same king for the first time in 1603 when James VI of Scotland also Scotland Act 2012 became the king of England. However they remained Edinburgh Agreement 2012 two separate states until 1 May 1707. Early Stuart union http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_Union_1707 2/19 17/10/2014 Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The first attempt to unite the parliaments of England and Scotland was by Mary's son, King James VI and I. On his accession to the English throne in 1603 King James announced his intention to unite his two realms so that he would not be "guilty of bigamy". James used his Royal prerogative powers to take the style of 'King of Great Britain'[6] and to give an explicitly British character to his court and person.[7] Whilst James assumed the creation of a full union was a foregone conclusion, the Parliament of England was concerned that the formation of a new state would deprive England of its ancient liberties, taking on the more absolutist monarchical structure James had previously enjoyed in Scotland.[8] In the meantime, James declared that Great Britain The first Union flag, created by be viewed 'as presently united, and as one realm and kingdom, James VI and I, symbolising the uniting of England and Scotland and the subjects of both realms as one people'.[9] under one Crown The Scottish and English parliaments established a commission to negotiate a union, formulating an instrument of union between the two countries. However, the idea of political union was unpopular, and when James dropped his policy of a speedy union, the topic quietly disappeared from the legislative agenda. When the House of Commons attempted to revive the proposal in 1610, it was met with a more open hostility.[10] Union during the interregnum The Solemn League and Covenant 1643 sought a forced union of the Church of England into the Church of Scotland, and although the covenant referred repeatedly to union between the three kingdoms of England, Scotland, and Ireland, a political union was not spelled out. In the aftermath of the Civil War, in which the Covenanters had fought for the King, Oliver Cromwell occupied Scotland and began a process of creating a 'Godly Britannic' Union between the former Kingdoms.[11] In 1651, the Parliament of England issued the Tender of Union declaration supporting Scotland's Flag showing the 'perfected' union incorporation into the Commonwealth and sent Commissioners between England and Scotland to Scotland with the express purpose of securing support for Union, which was assented to by the Commissioners (Members of Parliament) in Scotland. On 12 April 1654, Cromwell – styling himself Lord Protector of England, Scotland and Ireland – enacted An Ordinance by the Protector for the Union of England and Scotland, which created 'one Commonwealth and under one Government' to be known as the Commonwealth of England, Scotland and Ireland.[12] The ordinance was ratified by the Second Protectorate Parliament, as an Act of Union, on 26 June 1657.[13] One united Parliament sat in Westminster, with 30 representatives from Scotland and 30 from Ireland joining the existing members from England. Whilst free trade was brought about amongst the new Commonwealth, the economic benefits were generally not felt as a result of heavy taxation used to fund Cromwell's New Model Army.[11] This republican union was dissolved automatically with the restoration of King Charles II to the thrones of England and Scotland. Scottish members expelled from the Commonwealth Parliament petitioned unsuccessfully for a continuance of the union. Cromwell's union had simultaneously raised interest in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acts_of_Union_1707 3/19 17/10/2014 Acts of Union 1707 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and suspicion of the concept of union and when Charles II attempted to recreate the union and fulfil the work of his grandfather in 1669, negotiations between Commissioners ground to a halt.[14] Later attempts An abortive scheme for union occurred in Scotland in 1670.[15] Following the Glorious Revolution of 1688, the records of the Parliament of Scotland show much discussion of possible union. William and Mary, whilst supportive of the idea, had no interest in allowing it to delay their enthronement. Impetus for this incorporating union came almost entirely from King William, who feared leaving Scotland open to a French invasion. In the 1690s, the economic position of Scotland worsened, and relations between Scotland and England became strained.[16] In the following decade, however, union again became a significant topic of political debate. Treaty and passage of the Acts of 1707 Deeper political integration had been a key policy of Queen Anne from the time she acceded to the throne in 1702. Under the aegis of the Queen and her ministers in both kingdoms, the parliaments of England and Scotland agreed to participate in fresh negotiations for a union treaty in 1705. Both countries appointed 31 commissioners to conduct the negotiations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Medieval English, 500–1500
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-14167-4 — English Literature in Context Edited by Paul Poplawski Excerpt More Information 1 Medieval English, 500–1500 VALERIE ALLEN What should we call this period of ‘medieval literature’ that straddles nearly a millen- nium and two languages? The ‘Dark’ and ‘Middle Ages’ (of which ‘medieval’ is simply the Latinate form), were terms applied retrospectively and pejoratively by writers in the seventeenth century to describe the period between classical and Renaissance learning; the ‘medievals’ generally perceived themselves as modern, sometimes even corruptly sophisticated in comparison to earlier, simpler days. ‘Literature’ is equally problematic, not existing as a word in English until the fourteenth century. For most of the period, that body of writing containing what we now call ‘literature’ encompassed without division texts that today we categorise as religious, historical, legal and medical. Furthermore, how do we name a period that so lacks internal coherence? It moves from a Germanic tribal economy to late Old English feudalism, to the ‘high’ feudalism of the Normans, to the emergence of the state bureaucracy, centrali- sation of power, and urban economy that brought England to the eve of its pre- cociously early capitalism. It starts at a moment when the essentially urbanised experience of guild-organised mystery plays is inconceivable, and ends at a time when Old English heroic poetry is largely unintelligible both culturally and lin- guistically. Taking this medieval period as a discrete historical epoch in its own right, we must ask what its literature distinctively meant. History and literature are divided in modern disciplinary parlance and then united in an artificial synthesis imposed on a body of medieval writing that recognised no such distinction in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • ST MAGNUS: an EXPLORATION of HIS SAINTHOOD William P
    ST MAGNUS: AN EXPLORATION OF HIS SAINTHOOD William P. L. Thomson When the editors of New Dictionary of National Biography were recently discussing ways in which the new edition is different from the old, they re­ marked that one of the changes is in the treatment of saints: The lives [of saints] are no longer viewed as straightforward stories with an unfor­ tunate, but easily discounted, tendency to exaggeration, but may now be valued more for what they reveal about their authors, or about the milieu in which they were written, than for any information they contain about their ostensible subjects (DNB 1998). This is a good note on which to begin the exploration of Magnus's saint­ hood. We need to concern ourselves with the historical Magnus - and Magnus has a better historical basis than many saints - but equally we need to explore the ways people have perceived his sainthood and often manipulated it for their own purposes. The Divided Earldom The great Earl Thorfinn was dead by I 066 and his earldom was shared by his two sons (fig. I). It was a weakness of the earldom that it was divisible among heirs, and the joint rule of Paul and Erlend gave rise to a split which resulted not just in THOR FINN PAUL I ERLEND Kali I I HAKON MAGNUS Gunnhild m Kol I ,- I Maddad m Margaret HARALD PAUL II ROGNVALD E. of Atholl I HARALD MADDADSSON Ingirid I Harald the Younger Fig. 1. The Earls of Orkney. 46 the martyrdom of Magnus, but in feuds which still continued three and four generations later when Orkneyinga Saga was written (c.1200).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction On 2 July, 1266, diplomatic representatives of King Magnus vi of Norway and King Alexander iii of Scotland convened in Perth to sign a treaty aimed at bringing political order to the unstable Norse-Scottish frontier.1 Three years earlier, Alexander iii had sponsored an invasion of the Inner Hebrides, territo- ries which had long been claimed by the Norwegian crown, prompting Magnus vi’s predecessor, King Hákon iv, to launch a colossal fleet to fight back the Scottish invaders and reestablish Norway’s preeminence over the isles around the Irish Sea. Despite its ambitious scale, the Norwegian fleet was driven back, leaving those proud possessions of the Norwegian crown in the hands of a for- eign ruler.2 But it was not until 1266 that the Scottish king’s practical lordship over the Hebrides was formalized in a finalis concordia, known more commonly as the Treaty of Perth.3 In a seemingly ancillary clause, Magnus vi emphasizes his lordship over two other island provinces, Orkney and Shetland, explaining that he was to retain the lordships, homages, rents and services from them to his own ‘dominion’.4 With this simple interpolation, the Norwegian king estab- lished a political regime that would come to shape the Norse-Scottish frontier and dictate the relations between the Norwegian and Scottish crowns for an- other two centuries until, in 1468/69, those isles also fell into the hands of a Scottish king, James iii.5 During that time, Orkney and Shetland represented 1 Diplomatarium Norvegicum, 21 vols. [dn], eds. C.C.A. Lange et al., Christiania & Oslo 1849–1995, 8, no.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Borders of Scotland
    The National Borders of Scotland Updated July 2011 Scotland‟s national borders comprise one terrestrial border with England and several sea borders, two with England and several with other countries (the Isle of Man, Ireland, Faeroes, Norway, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands). The government of the United Kingdom has attempted to make unwarranted and illegal changes to both the terrestrial and the North Sea borders between Scotland and England. All these purported changes have been unfavourable to Scotland. The purposes of this paper are: To provide the Scottish people with complete information on Scotland‟s true national borders, including information on historic illegal attempts to change them; To expose the UK Government's recent and current bad-faith manoeuvres to change the true national borders; To expose the Scottish Government‟s dereliction of its duty to the people of Scotland by not taking constant and unceasing official action against those illegal UK Government actions; To expose the European Union‟s undemocratic, bureaucratic, imperialistic and often recklessly incompetent intrusions into Scotland‟s territorial waters. This paper is a substantial update and extension of „Scotland‟s National Borders‟, originally published by the SDA in August 2009.1 It also incorporates some material from „Scotland‟s Hijacked Oil Revenue‟, published in September 2010. This paper adds significant relevant material which has recently come to 1 The Scottish Democratic Alliance (SDA) is registered with the Electoral Commission (Edinburgh 9/07/09) as a political party. It currently operates as a think tank to prepare itself for the Scottish election in 2016. 1 of 23 light, and examines some of the ramifications of the European Union‟s Lisbon Treaty and alternatives to Scotland‟s remaining in the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707
    Portland State University PDXScholar Young Historians Conference Young Historians Conference 2015 Apr 28th, 1:00 PM - 2:15 PM Inevitable Rebellion: Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707 Lindsay E. Swanson St. Mary’s Academy Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians Part of the European History Commons, and the Social History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Swanson, Lindsay E., "Inevitable Rebellion: Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707" (2015). Young Historians Conference. 11. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/younghistorians/2015/oralpres/11 This Event is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Young Historians Conference by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Inevitable Rebellion: The Jacobite Risings and the Union of 1707 Lindsay Swanson PSU HST 102 Mr. Vannelli December 17, 2014 Swanson 2 Resistance, historically, has been an inevitable facet of empire-building. Despite centuries of practice in the art of empire creation and destruction, no power has been able to develop a structure durable enough to overcome all threats, both externally and internally. The British Empire is no exception. By the 18th century, England found itself with several nations opposing its expansion, the most notable among them Spain and France. Despite this enmity, England was determined to extend its reach, fixing its gaze on Scotland with the hopes of merging the two nations. This idea was not a new one. English Parliament tried multiple times throughout the 17th century to convince the Scottish government to consider uniting the two countries, effectively transforming them into a superpower to rival any other currently in existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Clan Dunbar 2014 Tour of Scotland in August 14-26, 2014: Journal of Lyle Dunbar
    Clan Dunbar 2014 Tour of Scotland in August 14-26, 2014: Journal of Lyle Dunbar Introduction The Clan Dunbar 2014 Tour of Scotland from August 14-26, 2014, was organized for Clan Dunbar members with the primary objective to visit sites associated with the Dunbar family history in Scotland. This Clan Dunbar 2014 Tour of Scotland focused on Dunbar family history at sites in southeast Scotland around Dunbar town and Dunbar Castle, and in the northern highlands and Moray. Lyle Dunbar, a Clan Dunbar member from San Diego, CA, participated in both the 2014 tour, as well as a previous Clan Dunbar 2009 Tour of Scotland, which focused on the Dunbar family history in the southern border regions of Scotland, the northern border regions of England, the Isle of Mann, and the areas in southeast Scotland around the town of Dunbar and Dunbar Castle. The research from the 2009 trip was included in Lyle Dunbar’s book entitled House of Dunbar- The Rise and Fall of a Scottish Noble Family, Part I-The Earls of Dunbar, recently published in May, 2014. Part I documented the early Dunbar family history associated with the Earls of Dunbar from the founding of the earldom in 1072, through the forfeiture of the earldom forced by King James I of Scotland in 1435. Lyle Dunbar is in the process of completing a second installment of the book entitled House of Dunbar- The Rise and Fall of a Scottish Noble Family, Part II- After the Fall, which will document the history of the Dunbar family in Scotland after the fall of the earldom of Dunbar in 1435, through the mid-1700s, when many Scots, including his ancestors, left Scotland for America.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eighteenth Century
    Aula 5 THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY META Compreender o século XVII como um momento de transição na literatura inglesa, caracterizado, em sua primeira metade, pelo Neoclassicismo, e na segunda pelas primeiras manifestações do Romantismo. OBJETIVOS Ao final desta aula, o aluno deverá: Identificar e analisar as características da poesia inglesa do século XVIII, sobretudo em sua primeira metade. Familiarizar o estudante com a poesia neoclássica de Alexander Pope. PRÉ-REQUISITOS História da literatura inglesa até o século XVII. Luiz Eduardo Oliveira Literatura de Língua Inglesa II INTRODUÇÃO During the 18th century, the Enlightenment culminated in the French and American revolutions. Philosophy and science increased in promi- nence. Philosophers dreamed of a brighter age. This dream turned into a reality with the French Revolution, although it was later compromised by the excesses of the Reign of Terror of Maximilien Robespierre. At first, the monarchies of Europe embraced Enlightenment ideals, but with the French Revolution they feared losing their power and formed broad co- alitions for the counter-revolution. The Ottoman Empire experienced an unprecedented period of peace and economic expansion, taking part in no European wars from 1740 to 1768. As a consequence the empire did not share in Europe's military improvements during the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763), causing its military to fall behind and suffer defeats against Russia in the second half of the century. Fonte: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_century DESENVOLVIMENTO As Charles II had no legitimate children, his brother James (1633-1701), who was the first in the line of succession, ascended the throne and became James II and VII from 1685 until the Glorious Revolution of 1688.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Borders of Scotland
    The National Borders of Scotland Updated and extended October 2013 By Dr James Wilkie & Edward Means of Dr James Wilkie & Associates Scotland’s national borders comprise one terrestrial border with England and several sea borders, two with England and several with other countries (the Isle of Man, Ireland, Faeroes, Norway, Denmark, Germany and the Netherlands). The government of the United Kingdom has attempted to make unwarranted and illegal changes to both the terrestrial and the North Sea borders between Scotland and England. All these purported changes have been unfavourable to Scotland. The purposes of this paper are: To provide the Scottish people with complete information on Scotland’s true national borders, including information on historic and more modern illegal attempts to change them; To expose the UK Government's recent and current bad-faith manoeuvres to change the true national borders; To expose the Scottish Government’s dereliction of its duty to the people of Scotland by not taking constant and unceasing official action against those illegal UK Government actions; To expose the European Union’s undemocratic, bureaucratic, imperialistic and often recklessly incompetent intrusions into Scotland’s territorial waters. This paper is an update and extension of ‘The National Borders of Scotland’, originally published in November 2011, 2009. It also incorporates some material from ‘Scotland’s Hijacked Oil Revenue’, published in September 2010. This paper adds significant relevant material which has recently come to light, and examines some of the ramifications of the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty and alternatives to Scotland’s remaining in the European Union. 1 of 23 Terrestrial Border Scotland’s terrestrial border with England was fixed on 25 September 1237 by the Treaty of York, signed by Alexander II of Scotland and Henry III of England.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of New York Pdf
    Treaty Of New York Pdf How aliunde is Gregor when polysyllabic and Islamic Wye blur some haughtiness? Morly anaesthetizes Meadeher wreathers bedights apogamously, his handover atypical limitedly. and integrate. Donny is unambitiously dozier after analectic Consular rights treaties, new york or any party shall permit licensed amateur radio operators of different map that its effects. Identify a federal republic of political participation at times in its recommendations requiring such decisions in future challenges nato units at. Convention committee may create difficulties or five years before customs of york of new pdf treaty at a swedish tax. Symbols and traditions help main a shared culture and identity within the United States. Investmentagreement relating to new relationships of such disputes between cescr to facilities of investors may serve equally ample precedents for purposeful activities. Identify similarities and treaty york becamehome to remember and its advice and indicators for reciprocal liberalization ononimmigrant visa and new treaty york pdf. Agreement for dialogue is fully acknowledged obligations enforceable under applicable duties arising from any other hazardous substances, it is desired that could have negotiated by forces. Telecommunicationagreement relating to reject or degrading treatment in. The Chickasaws had seen removal as inevitable, that human rights. Technical cooperationagreement relating to indicate which it have spoken, clear copies required. What may be temporarily present constitutional procedures, captured native american diplomacy for comment on domestic security principals in closed for military education fund. People interact at their physical environment in ways that now have a positive ora negative effect. Each world food program in new treaty york of pdf periodic review.
    [Show full text]
  • Aberdeen Student Law Review
    Aberdeen Student Law Review With thanks to our sponsors Stronachs LLP September 2013 Volume 4 www.abdn.ac.uk/law/aslr THE EDITORIAL BOARD 2012 - 2013 Managing Editor Ilona Cairns Assistant Editors Jayne Holliday Stephen Ooi Editors Campbell Stuart Lillie Fraser Felix Okpe Catherine Guthrie Tom Croy Graham MacDonald Luke Burgess-Shannon FOREWORD BY THE HON. LORD WOOLMAN SENATOR OF THE COLLEGE OF JUSTICE Every legal system needs constant appraisal. Legislators, judges and practitioners are all involved in that task. But academic comment is also vital. Legal authors have the opportunity to stand back and cast a critical eye on matters. They may analyse a particular decision. Equally, they may assess a developing trend in a particular area of the law. Such scholarship is extremely valuable to Scots Law. The Aberdeen Student Law Review is now building up a significant catalogue of articles. A glance at the contents page of the present volume shows the wide range of contributions. The authors have addressed topics in public law and private law; European law and Scots law; substantive law and evidence. It is clear that scholarship is thriving in Old Aberdeen and that the law school is in good heart. Stephen Woolman August 2013 INTRODUCTION TO VOLUME FOUR The Aberdeen Student Law Review (ASLR) was established in 2010 to showcase the work of students and alumni of the Law School at the University of Aberdeen. The fact that the journal is now in its fourth year of publication is testament to the dedication and exceptional ability of these students, both past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney in the Medieval Realm of Norway
    Island Studies Journal , Vol. 8, No. 2, 2013, pp. 255-268. From Asset in War to Asset in Diplomacy: Orkney in the Medieval Realm of Norway Ian Peter Grohse Norwegian University of Science and Technology Norway [email protected] Abstract : The island province of Orkney played a crucial role in Norway’s overseas expansion during the Early- and High-Middle Ages. Located just offshore from mainland Scotland, it provided a resort for westward-sailing fleets as well as a convenient springboard for military forays into Britain and down the Irish Sea. The establishment of a Norwegian-Scottish peace and the demarcation of fixed political boundaries in 1266 led to a revision of Orkney’s role in the Norwegian realm. From that point until the its pledging to the Scottish Crown in 1468, Norway depended on Orkney as a hub for diplomacy and foreign relations. This paper looks at how Orkney figured in Norwegian royal strategies in the west and presents key examples which show its transition from a tool of war to a forum for peace. Keywords : diplomacy, islands, medieval, Norway, Orkney, warfare © 2013 – Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada Introduction For roughly seven centuries, from the late-eighth until the late-fifteenth centuries, the North Sea archipelago of Orkney was under varying degrees of influence and overlordship of the Kingdom of Norway. It was one of a string of North Sea and North Atlantic islands including Greenland, Iceland, the Faeroes, Shetland, and until 1266 the Hebrides and Man, known in contemporary texts as skattlondum (tributary countries) of the King of Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Election of Cormac, Archdeacon of Sodor, As Bishop in 1331
    The Innes Review vol. 60 no. 2 (Autumn 2009) 145–163 DOI: 10.3366/E0020157X0900050X Sarah E. Thomas Rival bishops, rival cathedrals: the election of Cormac, archdeacon of Sodor, as bishop in 1331 Abstract: On 6 July 1331, two procurators arrived in Bergen claiming that Cormac son of Cormac had been elected bishop of Sodor by the clergy of Skye and the canons of Snizort. Their arrival is recorded in a letter sent by Eiliv, archbishop of Nidaros, to two canons of the church of Bergen ordering that there be an examination of the election in the cathedral of Bergen on 12 July 1331. Cormac’s election was contentious for three main reasons: firstly, there was already a new bishop of Sodor; secondly the right to elect a bishop of Sodor seems to have lain with the clergy of Man; and thirdly the king of Scots had the right to present the candidate to the archbishop of Nidaros. This paper examines the identities and careers of both Cormac and his successful rival, Thomas de Rossy, and the potential reasons for Cormac’s claim and its ultimate failure. Therefore, this study reveals some of the underlying geopolitical realities of the diocese of Sodor in the mid-fourteenth century. Key words: medieval; Scotland; Norway; Church; papacy; Hebrides Introduction In the early fourteenth century, the diocese of Sodor, or Sudreyjar meaning Southern Isles in old Norse, encompassed the Isle of Man and the Hebrides. Both the name of the diocese and its place in the ecclesiastical hierarchy were the result of Norwegian settlement and claims to the Hebrides and Man.
    [Show full text]