Farming the Forest Steppe: Sustainable Land Management in Western Siberia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Farming the Forest Steppe: Sustainable Land Management in Western Siberia FARMING THE FOREST STEPPE: SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT IN WESTERN SIBERIA Results of the SASCHA project, 2011 – 2016 SASCHA: SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES TO CLIMATE CHANGE FOR THE WESTERN SIBERIAN GRAIN BELT Project results 2011 – 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 9 Western Siberia: a hotspot of global change 10 Sustainable land management in Western Siberia 11 The changing fortunes of Siberian agriculture 14 Cultural landscapes at a crossroads 17 Climate and land-use change: closely connected 19 Biodiversity: animals and plants respond to change 21 Testing solutions to challenges in land management 23 Where there is muck there is brass: Improving manure management 27 Alternative futures: Scenario planning for sustainability Scenario 1: Intensify at any cost Scenario 2: Making ends meet in the green Scenario 3: The certified among the poor Scenario 4: Rethinking the goals 32 What will last? 33 Further reading: Scientific articles onSASCHA project results Previous page: Siberia's mires – a globally important soil carbon reservoir (Tim Wertebach). 8 WESTERN SIBERIA: A HOTSPOT OF GLOBAL CHANGE region, but also in the humus layers of the Black Earth soils. When carbon is released, First-time visitors often expect little for example by drainage or cultivation for more from Siberia than freezing tempera- agriculture, it turns into CO2 and acceler- tures and perhaps polar bears. Of course, ates global warming. Land management Siberia is much more than the European in Western Siberia has thus a vital role in stereotypes might suggest. Stretching mitigating global climate change. across several climatic zones and eco-re- gions, it has breath-taking landscapes, di- Sparsely populated, Western Siberia verse peoples and culture, and even vast has also been a safe haven for biodiversity: areas under agricultural use. Populations of plants and animals that are being depleted across Europe due to Western Siberia, situated between the intensive land use and the expansion of Ural Mountains and the Yenisei River, is urban conglomerations thrive here, reach- of global significance in several respects. ing a diversity and abundance that is long It supplies a good deal of the world's en- gone from many Western European coun- ergy through its leading role in exploiting tries. large resources of fossil fuels – the West- ern Siberian gas and oil fields stretch over However, as in many other parts of the an area half the size of Europe. The south- world, the tides are changing. Production ern parts of Western Siberia, the so-called and intensity of land use are increasing. Western Siberian grain belt, makes an People abandon the traditional villag- important contribution to global food se- es and move to the cities. Fast growth is Omsk curity: the fertile Chernozem (Black Earth) observed in the exploitation of natural soils bear rich crops for human consump- resources. The associated infrastructure tion and as livestock fodder. Western Sibe- such as a new road network allows access ria is also globally important from an en- to the last wild corners. While develop- vironmental point of view. The soils in the ment is undoubtedly good news for large area store a large proportion of the global parts of the rural human population, it soil carbon, especially in the mighty peat might also affect the environment – with layers of the huge bogs and mires of the unforeseeable consequences. Map of the main ecozones of Eastern Europe and Western Siberia. Tyumen province is outlined blue (WWF Ecozones). R U S S II A ¹ U r a l s !( !( Yaroslavl Perm !( Tyumen Ekaterinburg !( Astana !( Kazan !( Moscow Ufa !( !(Omsk Samara !( K A Z A K H S T A N 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 K A Z A K H S T A N km Forest steppe Taiga Mountain forest and tundra Borders of Tyumen province Mixed forest Hemiboreal forest Steppe Border with Kazakhstan 9 SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGE- MENT IN WESTERN SIBERIA When Russian and German land-use researchers first met in 2009, they were Concerns about ‘unsustainable’ deve- quick in agreeing that there are ma- lopments are mounting in many regions jor knowledge gaps. How has land use of the world, and Western Siberia is no changed since the break-up of the Soviet exception. Future land use across the Union in 1991, and how will it change in Western Siberian grain belt needs to be the future? What does this change mean sustainable to minimize environmental for the Siberian ecosystems and biodiver- impacts. Sustainability, defined as the sity, for agricultural business and for the property of biological systems to remain people of the region? Will local change diverse and produce indefinitely, entails contribute to global climate change? Re- several components. Environmental sus- searchers and students from two Russian tainability in our case would mean the and five German universities and a Ger- maintenance of important ecosystem man remote-sensing enterprise teamed functions, such as climate regulation or up to answer these questions. soil fertility, and the conservation of West- ern Siberia's unique biodiversity. Eco- As study region, the forest steppe in nomical sustainability would be achieved the south of Russia's Tyumen province if profitability in agriculture and other was selected, a landscape characterized land uses was guaranteed on the long by a mosaic of birch forests, grassland run. Social sustainability would be met and cropfields, and part of the massive if the living standard of the rural human Western Siberian grain belt. population stayed stable or increased rather than deteriorated. Mosaic of grassland and forest is typical for the Western Siberian forest steppe. In rural areas, people still use the landscape in diverse ways, such as these villagers who harvest wild strawberries (Immo Kämpf). 10 However, when the main research of cows in Soviet times. Livestock breed- questions were answered, the project ing was hit hard by the collapse of the team did not rest. Hands-on work on the state farm system in the 1990s, and the ground started, in order to develop farm- number of cattle and sheep crashed in ing techniques with local enterprises to Tyumen province: Declines of up to 60 % make land use more sustainable. Politi- were recorded2: hundreds of thousands cians were approached with the agglom- of animals. erated knowledge to influence far-reach- ing decisions. Different scenarios of Total sown Fodder crops potential future developments were set 1500 up and discussed widely with the public and decision makers. Total sown Fodder crops 1500 The aim of this brochure is to introduce 1000 you to the research results, and to illus- trate potential future pathways to more 1000 Area (*1000 ha) sustainable land use in Western Siberia. 500 Area (*1000 ha) 500 THE CHANGING FORTUNES OF 0 SIBERIAN AGRICULTURE 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 0 Agriculture has a long history in Tyu- men province, despite the harsh climate 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 with a short growing season. The fortunes of agricultural production in the Western Siberian grain belt were varied over the All cattle 800 Subsistence past decades: In Soviet times, state-run farms produced large quantities of grain All cattle 600 and fodder, and the surplus was export- 800 Subsistence ed to many other parts of former Eastern Bloc. Millions of cattle and sheep were 400 kept for meat and dairy production. 600 Animals *1000 Political change in 1991, with the break- 200 up of the Soviet Union into independent 400 republics, resulted in disorder in econ- Animals *1000 omy and society. The Russian economy 0 200 transitioned from a centrally planned to a market-oriented system. Farms were pri- 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 vatized and are no longer affected exclu- 0 sively by Moscow's policies, but now also Trends in the area sown for crops and livestock numbers by global markets and demand1. When in Tyumen1990 province,1995 for the2000 period 19902005 – 20152010 2015 travelling the countryside of Tyumen (Tyumen Statistics Office 2016). province today, signs of change strike the eye: In many areas, derelict livestock sta- Following page: Abandoned cropfield, now used by the bles are visible, each hosting hundreds villagers as communal pasture (Immo Kämpf). 11 Soviet-time machinery is increasingly replaced with new tractors for the large Siberian fields (Insa Kühling). Russia's livestock industry is only slow- stock breeding has been modernized, ly recovering, and beef is still imported with most cattle now kept in stables year- from Brazil and other countries despite round and fed with grain and fodder the large land resources that could be crops produced on the fields. used for grazing free-ranging herds. Sim- ilarly, many crop fields of the Soviet era are not in use anymore, especially those that are too unproductive under the new CULTURAL LANDSCAPES market conditions, or are situated in ar- AT A CROSSROADS eas difficult to access with heavy trac- tors such as waterlogged depressions3. It is not only the large-scale, industri- According to official land use statistics al farming enterprises that satisfy local about 400 000 ha of crop fields were food demand. The rural communities in abandoned across the province after Tyumen province grow more potatoes in 19912, 3 – a huge land reserve. their village backyards than all big agri- cultural enterprises together2. Half of the However, during the last decade, ag- livestock is owned by the villagers, who riculture in Tyumen province has gained keep cattle and sheep for meat and dairy momentum again2: Crop production products2. Subsistence agriculture still concentrates now in the highest-yield- plays an important role in the agricultural ing areas, Soviet-period machinery is economy in Russia. gradually replaced with the latest brands allowing to farm much more efficient- The forest steppe, this mosaic of ly, and fertilizer application is also more small birch groves, wetlands and intensive leading to higher output per fields, has been shaped by man for hectare.
Recommended publications
  • Russia's Boreal Forests
    Forest Area Key Facts & Carbon Emissions Russia’s Boreal Forests from Deforestation Forest location and brief description Russia is home to more than one-fifth of the world’s forest areas (approximately 763.5 million hectares). The Russian landscape is highly diverse, including polar deserts, arctic and sub-arctic tundra, boreal and semi-tundra larch forests, boreal and temperate coniferous forests, temperate broadleaf and mixed forests, forest-steppe and steppe (temperate grasslands, savannahs, and shrub-lands), semi-deserts and deserts. Russian boreal forests (known in Russia as the taiga) represent the largest forested region on Earth (approximately 12 million km2), larger than the Amazon. These forests have relatively few tree species, and are composed mainly of birch, pine, spruce, fir, with some deciduous species. Mixed in among the forests are bogs, fens, marshes, shallow lakes, rivers and wetlands, which hold vast amounts of water. They contain more than 55 per cent of the world’s conifers, and 11 per cent of the world’s biomass. Unique qualities of forest area Russia’s boreal region includes several important Global 200 ecoregions - a science-based global ranking of the Earth’s most biologically outstanding habitats. Among these is the Eastern-Siberian Taiga, which contains the largest expanse of untouched boreal forest in the world. Russia’s largest populations of brown bear, moose, wolf, red fox, reindeer, and wolverine can be found in this region. Bird species include: the Golden eagle, Black- billed capercaillie, Siberian Spruce grouse, Siberian accentor, Great gray owl, and Naumann’s thrush. Russia’s forests are also home to the Siberian tiger and Far Eastern leopard.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KAZAKH STEPPE Conserving the World's Largest Dry
    THE KAZAKH STEPPE Conserving the world’s largest dry steppe region Photo: Chris Magin, IUCN Saryarka is an internationally significant mosaic of steppe and wetlands The Dry Steppe Region The steppe grasslands of Eurasia were once among the most extensive in the world, stretching from eastern Romania, Moldova and Ukraine in eastern Europe (often referred to as the Pontic steppe) east through Kazakhstan and western Russia). Together, the Pontic and Kazakh steppes, often collectively referred to as the Pontian steppe, comprise about 24% of the world’s temperate grasslands. They eventually link to the vast grasslands of eastern Asia extending to Mongolia, China and Siberian Russia, together creating the largest complex of temperate grasslands on earth. The remaining extent and ecological condition of these grasslands varies considerably by region. Today in eastern Europe, for example, only 3–5 % remain in a natural or near natural state, with only 0.2% protected. In contrast, the eastward extension of these steppes into Kazakhstan reveals lower levels of disturbance, where as much as 36% remain in a semi-natural or natural state. Although current levels of protection in this region are also very low, the steppes of Kazakhstan have the potential to offer significant opportunities for increased conservation and protection. The Kazakh steppe, also known as the Kirghiz steppe, is itself one of the largest dry steppe regions on the planet, covering approximately 804,500 square kilometres and extending more than 2,200 kilometres from north of the Caspian Sea east to the Altai Mountains. These grasslands lie at the southern end of the Ural Mountains, the traditional dividing line between Europe and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Ecoregions of the United States
    (iii) ~ Agrl~:::~~;~":,c ullur. Description of the ~:::;. Ecoregions of the ==-'Number 1391 United States •• .~ • /..';;\:?;;.. \ United State. (;lAn) Department of Description of the .~ Agriculture Forest Ecoregions of the Service October United States 1980 Compiled by Robert G. Bailey Formerly Regional geographer, Intermountain Region; currently geographer, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Prepared in cooperation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and originally published as an unnumbered publication by the Intermountain Region, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah In April 1979, the Agency leaders of the Bureau of Land Manage­ ment, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, Geological Survey, and Soil Conservation Service endorsed the concept of a national classification system developed by the Resources Evaluation Tech­ niques Program at the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, to be used for renewable resources evaluation. The classifica­ tion system consists of four components (vegetation, soil, landform, and water), a proposed procedure for integrating the components into ecological response units, and a programmed procedure for integrating the ecological response units into ecosystem associations. The classification system described here is the result of literature synthesis and limited field testing and evaluation. It presents one procedure for defining, describing, and displaying ecosystems with respect to geographical distribution. The system and others are undergoing rigorous evaluation to determine the most appropriate procedure for defining and describing ecosystem associations. Bailey, Robert G. 1980. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391, 77 pp. This publication briefly describes and illustrates the Nation's ecosystem regions as shown in the 1976 map, "Ecoregions of the United States." A copy of this map, described in the Introduction, can be found between the last page and the back cover of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation at the Taiga Forest–Steppe Borderline in the Western Khentey Mountains, Northern Mongolia
    Ann. Bot. Fennici 42: 411–426 ISSN 0003-3847 Helsinki 19 December 2005 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2005 Vegetation at the taiga forest–steppe borderline in the western Khentey Mountains, northern Mongolia Choimaa Dulamsuren1, Markus Hauck2 & Michael Mühlenberg1 1) Center of Nature Conservation, University of Göttingen, Von-Siebold-Straße 2, D-37075 Göttingen, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) 2) Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 31 Aug. 2004, revised version received 11 Nov. 2004, accepted 7 Jan. 2005 Dulamsuren, C., Hauck, M. & Mühlenberg, M. 2005: Vegetation at the taiga forest–steppe border- line in the western Khentey Mountains, northern Mongolia. — Ann. Bot. Fennici 42: 411–426. Vegetation of an area of 500 km2 in the western Khentey Mountains, northern Mon- golia is phytosociologically classified with the help of 254 relevés. Twenty-one main vegetation units are described. The study area is situated at the interface between the western Siberian dark taiga, the eastern Siberian light taiga and the Mongolian-Daurian forest steppe. A small-scale pattern of these three major vegetation types was found depending on site characteristics. Dark taiga forests of Pinus sibirica, Abies sibirica, Picea obovata, and Larix sibirica grow at the most humid sites. Light taiga forests dominated by Larix sibirica and Betula platyphylla occur on relatively dry northern slopes of the lower montane belt. Sun-exposed, southern slopes of the lower montane belt are covered by montane meadow and mountain steppe. DCA ordination suggests that the distribution of vegetation types depends on water supply and altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen-Based Quantitative Land-Cover Reconstruction for Northern Asia Covering the Last 40 Ka Cal BP
    Clim. Past, 15, 1503–1536, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-1503-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Pollen-based quantitative land-cover reconstruction for northern Asia covering the last 40 ka cal BP Xianyong Cao1,a, Fang Tian1, Furong Li2, Marie-José Gaillard2, Natalia Rudaya1,3,4, Qinghai Xu5, and Ulrike Herzschuh1,4,6 1Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Research Unit Potsdam, Telegrafenberg A43, Potsdam 14473, Germany 2Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Kalmar 39182, Sweden 3Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, pr. Akad. Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia 4Institute of Environmental Science and Geography, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24, 14476 Potsdam, Germany 5College of Resources and Environment Science, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China 6Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24, Potsdam 14476, Germany apresent address: Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology, CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China Correspondence: Xianyong Cao ([email protected]) and Ulrike Herzschuh ([email protected]) Received: 21 August 2018 – Discussion started: 23 October 2018 Revised: 3 July 2019 – Accepted: 8 July 2019 – Published: 8 August 2019 Abstract. We collected the available relative pollen produc- pollen producers. Comparisons with vegetation-independent tivity estimates (PPEs) for 27 major pollen taxa from Eura- climate records show that climate change is the primary fac- sia and applied them to estimate plant abundances during the tor driving land-cover changes at broad spatial and temporal last 40 ka cal BP (calibrated thousand years before present) scales.
    [Show full text]
  • A HOME for the DAURIA's RARE CREATURES Securing Steppe
    A HOME FOR THE DAURIA’S RARE CREATURES Securing steppe fauna in the Daursky Biosphere Reserve Photo: Vadim Kiriliuk Adon-Chelon, ‘The Herd of Stone Horses’ – a site targeted for Argali Sheep reintroduction Torey Lakes - Russian The Dauria Steppe Ecoregion The transboundary Dauria steppe ecoregion occurs across Mongolia, Russia and China. Within Russia, the Dauria steppe spreads across the Zabaikalsky Province in Russia’s Far East. It is renowned for its high diversity of fauna including the Great Bustard, Daurian Crane, Swan Goose, Mongolian Gazelle, Argali Sheep, Siberian Marmot, and Pallas Cat. The high zoological diversity of the region has been attributed to a number of factors including a large range of habitat types and dispersion corridors, the overlap of several zoogeographic zones, and extreme variations in climatic conditions which triggers widespread migrations in many species. Despite the high biodiversity values of the region, Zabaikalsky Province has the lowest protected areas coverage amongst Russia’s eastern provinces. One of the few protected areas in the region is the exceptional Daursky Biosphere Reserve, situated near the Mongolian and China border, which unites a cluster of reserves including the Tasucheisky Wildlife Refuge. Representing the majority of major landscape types of the Dauria, the 45,790 hectare core area of the Daursky consists of wetlands and rocky hills, while the 163,530 hectare buffer zone contains mostly grassland and pine stands. The reserve also includes the significant rocks of Adon-Chelon (‘The Herd of Stone Horses’ in Buryat language), and a stand of the rare Krylov pine which is uniquely adapted to survive the conditions of the dry steppes.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Territories and Empires: from Mongol Ulus to Russian Siberia1200-1800 Stephen Kotkin
    Defining Territories and Empires: from Mongol Ulus to Russian Siberia1200-1800 Stephen Kotkin (Princeton University) Copyright (c) 1996 by the Slavic Research Center All rights reserved. The Russian empire's eventual displacement of the thirteenth-century Mongol ulus in Eurasia seems self-evident. The overthrow of the foreign yoke, defeat of various khanates, and conquest of Siberia constitute core aspects of the narratives on the formation of Russia's identity and political institutions. To those who disavow the Mongol influence, the Byzantine tradition serves as a counterweight. But the geopolitical turnabout is not a matter of dispute. Where Chingis Khan and his many descendants once held sway, the Riurikids (succeeded by the Romanovs) moved in. *1 Rather than the shortlived but ramified Mongol hegemony, which was mostly limited to the middle and southern parts of Eurasia, longterm overviews of the lands that became known as Siberia, or of its various subregions, typically begin with a chapter on "pre-history," which extends from the paleolithic to the moment of Russian arrival in the late sixteenth, early seventeenth centuries. *2 The goal is usually to enable the reader to understand what "human material" the Russians found and what "progress" was then achieved. Inherent in the narratives -- however sympathetic they may or may not be to the native peoples -- are assumptions about the historical advance deriving from the Russian arrival and socio-economic transformation. In short, the narratives are involved in legitimating Russia's conquest without any notion of alternatives. Of course, history can also be used to show that what seems natural did not exist forever but came into being; to reveal that there were other modes of existence, which were either pushed aside or folded into what then came to seem irreversible.
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Mapping of World Grassland Types A
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2014) SYNTHESIS Distribution mapping of world grassland types A. P. Dixon1*, D. Faber-Langendoen2, C. Josse2, J. Morrison1 and C. J. Loucks1 1World Wildlife Fund – United States, 1250 ABSTRACT 24th Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, Aim National and international policy frameworks, such as the European USA, 2NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Drive, Union’s Renewable Energy Directive, increasingly seek to conserve and refer- 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, USA ence ‘highly biodiverse grasslands’. However, to date there is no systematic glo- bal characterization and distribution map for grassland types. To address this gap, we first propose a systematic definition of grassland. We then integrate International Vegetation Classification (IVC) grassland types with the map of Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW). Location Global. Methods We developed a broad definition of grassland as a distinct biotic and ecological unit, noting its similarity to savanna and distinguishing it from woodland and wetland. A grassland is defined as a non-wetland type with at least 10% vegetation cover, dominated or co-dominated by graminoid and forb growth forms, and where the trees form a single-layer canopy with either less than 10% cover and 5 m height (temperate) or less than 40% cover and 8 m height (tropical). We used the IVC division level to classify grasslands into major regional types. We developed an ecologically meaningful spatial cata- logue of IVC grassland types by listing IVC grassland formations and divisions where grassland currently occupies, or historically occupied, at least 10% of an ecoregion in the TEOW framework. Results We created a global biogeographical characterization of the Earth’s grassland types, describing approximately 75% of IVC grassland divisions with ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sibir' (Siberia)
    Ethnolinguistic 28 Lublin 2017 I. Research articles DOI: 10.17951/et.2016.28.187 Aleksandra S t a r z y ń s ka (Olomouc, Palacký University, Czech Republic) Sibir’ (Siberia) in the Russian language system∗ SIBIR’ (СИБИРЬ, SIBERIA) belongs to the concepts and words with a special status in the Russian lexis, and so in the Russian worldview. The present study reconstructs the image of SIBIR’ on the basis of the Russian language system (more precisely, on the basis of dictionaries) and with the use of the cognitive definition proposed by Jerzy Bartmiński. Discussed is the etymology of Sibir’ (Сибирь), the lexeme’s synonyms, opposites, semantic and word-formational derivatives. The analysis is complemented with a survey of fixed expressions and collocations. Thus we arrive at the cognitive definition that consists of thirty defining features organised into the following facets: category, part, opposition, location, non-physical features, size, appearance, localiser, living conditions, function, feelings and attitudes to Siberia, and the region’s inhabitants. In various contexts of the usage of Sibir’ (and its derivatives) the most conspicuous is the negative valuation of Siberia as a place of exile, harsh climate, and unwelcoming living conditions. Key words: cognitive definition, Siberia, language system, Russian ∗ The present paper is an abridged version of a fragment of my Ph.D. dissertation, prepared during my research stay at the Department of Polish Philology, Maria Curie- Skłodowska University in Lublin, Poland. The research stay for doctoral students of Palacký Univeristy Olomouc was possible thanks to an agreement between the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, the Republic of Poland, and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport, the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberia) Over the Last 8000 Years and Their Impact on the Types of Economic Life of the Population
    Quaternary Science Reviews 163 (2017) 152e161 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Environmental dynamics of the Baraba forest-steppe (Siberia) over the last 8000 years and their impact on the types of economic life of the population * Snezhana Zhilich a, c, Natalia Rudaya a, b, d, g, , Sergei Krivonogov b, c, Larisa Nazarova d, e, f, Dmitry Pozdnyakov a, g a Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS, Prospekt Ak. Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia b Novosibirsk State University, Ul. Pirogova 2, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia c Institute of Geology and Mineralogy SB RAS, Prospekt Ak. Koptyuga 3, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia d Kazan State University, Ul. Kremlyovskaya 18, Kazan, 420000, Russia e UniversitatPotsdam,€ Karl-Liebknecht-Straße 24e25, Golm, 14476, Potsdam, Germany f Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Department of Periglacial Research, 14473, Telegrafenberg A43 Potsdam, Germany g Altai State University, Str. Lenina, 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia article info abstract Article history: This article offers a reconstruction of the vegetation and climate of the south-western Siberian Baraba Received 16 February 2017 forest-steppe area during the last ca. 8000 years. The analysis of palynological data from the sediment Received in revised form core of Lake Bolshie Toroki using quantitative methods has made it possible to reconstruct changes of the 22 March 2017 dominant types of vegetation and mean July air temperatures. Coniferous forests grew in the vicinity of Accepted 22 March 2017 the lake, and mean July air temperatures were similar to present-day ones between 7.9 and 7.0 kyr BP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mammoths on Their Biome: Clash of Two Paradigms
    P. V. Putshkov Institute of Zoology,Academia of Sciences, Kiev The impact of mammoths on their biome: clash of two paradigms Putshkov, P.V., 2003 - The impact of mammoths on their biome: clash of two paradigms - in: Reumer, J.W.F., de Vos, J. & Mol, D. (eds.) - ADVANCES IN MAMMOTH RESEARCH (Proceedings of the Second International Mammoth Conference, Rotterdam, May 16-20 1999) - DEINSEA 9: 365- 379 [ISSN 0923-9308] Published 24 May 2003 Mammoths, woolly rhinoceroses, musk oxen, primitive bisons, and horses of northern races were stenobiotic cryoxerophiles living only under extreme cryoarid conditions according to the ‘steppe- tundra crash paradigm’. These animals are considered to be strict grazers on arid steppe-tundra gras- ses; hence, the possibility that mammoths maintain their pastures the way modern elephants do is rejected. Climatists claim that mammoths and their faunal satellites were killed by the Holocene warming a result of their inability to feed themselves in any of modern landscapes and to withstand the weather-caused losses. Their survival throughout interglacials is considered as resulting from climatic instability: short warm episodes are said to have alternated with very cold ones. It is belie- ved that a permanent Arctic Ocean ice-shield persisted along the Siberian coast even in summer; its cooling and aridifying influence maintained steppe-tundras and similar ecosystems throughout Northern Eurasia. On the contrary, the stable Holocene warming resulted in the disappearance of this ice-shield, in the destruction of the ecosystem of the mammoths, and in megafaunal extinctions. This conception is based mainly on the properties of Eemian Greenland ice layers.
    [Show full text]