DOCSLIB.ORG

ISAAA Briefs Brief 53 Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISAAA Briefs Brief 53 Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops ISAAA Briefs brief 53 Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years Up to 17 million farmers in 24 countries planted 189.8 million hectares (469 million acres) in 2017, an increase of 3% or 4.7 million hectares (11.6 million acres) from 2016. No. 53 – 2017 Over the last 21 years, ISAAA has devoted considerable effort usage of these words in different regions of the world, with to consolidate all the available data on officially approved biotech crops being used exclusively in this text because biotech crop adoption globally; it is important to note that of its growing usage worldwide. Similarly, the words corn, the database does not include plantings of biotech crops that used in North America, and maize, used more commonly are not officially approved. The database draws on a large elsewhere in the world, are synonymous, with maize being number of sources of approved biotech crops from both the used consistently in this Brief, except for common names like public and private sectors in many countries throughout the corn rootworm where global usage dictates the use of the world. The range of crops is those defined as food, feed and word corn. All $ dollar values in this Brief are US dollars unless fiber crops in the FAO database, which totaled ~10 billion otherwise noted. Some of the listed references may not be metric tons of production in 2010 (http://www.geohive.com. cited in the text – for convenience they have been included Charts/ag_crops.aspx). Data sources vary by country and because they are considered useful reading material and were include, where available, government statistics, independent used as preparatory documents for this Brief. Global totals of surveys, and estimates from commodity groups, seed millions of hectares planted with biotech crops have in some associations and other groups, plus a range of proprietary cases been rounded off to the nearest million and similarly, databases. In the interest of uniformity, continuity, and subtotals to the nearest 100,000 hectares, using both < and comparability, wherever possible, ISAAA utilizes the same > characters; hence in some cases this leads to insignificant published data source annually; for example, for Brazil, the approximations, and there may be minor variances in August biotech reports of Celeres are used; similarly, for some figures, totals, and percentage estimates that do not the US, the USDA/NASS crop acreage reports published always add up exactly to 100% due to rounding off. It is also on 30 June annually are used. Published ISAAA estimates important to note that countries in the Southern Hemisphere are, wherever possible, based on more than one source of plant their crops in the last quarter of the calendar year. The information and thus are usually not attributable to one biotech crop areas reported in this publication are planted, specific source. Multiple sources of information for the not necessarily harvested hectarage, in the year stated. Thus, same data point greatly facilitate assessment, verification, for example, the 2017 information for Argentina, Brazil, and validation of specific estimates. The “proprietary” ISAAA Australia, South Africa, and Uruguay is hectares usually database on biotech crops is unique from two points of view; planted in the last quarter of 2017 and harvested in the first, it provides a global perspective; second, it has used the first quarter of 2018, or later, with some countries like the same basic methodology, improved continuously for the last Philippines planting crops in more than one season per year. 20 years and hence provides continuity from the genesis Thus, for countries of the Southern hemisphere, such as Brazil of the commercialization of biotech crops in 1996, to the and Argentina the estimates are projections, and thus are present. The database has gained acceptance internationally always subject to change due to weather, which may increase as a reliable benchmark of the global status of biotech food, or decrease actual planted area before the end of the planting feed and fiber crops and is widely cited in the scientific season when this Brief went to press. For Brazil, the winter literature and the international press. Whereas individual maize crop (safrinha) planted at the end of December 2017 data points make-up the data base, the most valuable and more intensively through January and February 2018, is information is the trends of adoption over time, for example classified as a 2017 crop in this Brief, consistent with a policy the increasing dominance of developing countries which is which uses the first date of planting to determine the crop clearly evident. year. All biotech crop hectare estimates in this Brief, and all ISAAA publications, are only counted once, irrespective of how Note that the words rapeseed, canola, and Argentine canola many traits are incorporated in the crops. Country figures are used synonymously, as well as transgenic, genetically were sourced from The Economist, supplemented by data modified crops, GM crops, and biotech crops, reflecting the from World Bank, FAO and UNCTAD, when necessary. ISAAA Briefs brief 53 Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years No. 53 – 2017 ISAAA prepares this Brief and supports its free distribution to developing countries. The objective is to provide information and knowledge to the scientific community and society on biotech/GM crops to facilitate a more informed and transparent discussion regarding their potential role in contributing to global food, feed, fiber and fuel security, and a more sustainable agriculture. ISAAA takes full responsibility for the views expressed in this publication and for any errors of omission or misinterpretation. Published by: The International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Copyright: ISAAA 2017. All rights reserved. Whereas ISAAA encourages the global sharing of information in Brief 53, no part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the copyright owners. Reproduction of this publication, or parts thereof, for educational and non-commercial purposes is encouraged with due acknowledgment, subsequent to permission being granted by ISAAA. Citation: ISAAA. 2017. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops in 2017: Biotech Crop Adoption Surges as Economic Benefits Accumulate in 22 Years. ISAAA Brief No. 53. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY. This 2017 ISAAA Brief is the second extension of the 20 Volumes of Annual Briefs (1996 to 2015) on global status of biotech/GM crops authored by Clive James, Founder & Emeritus Chairman of ISAAA. iSBN: 978-1-892456-67-2 Publication Orders: Full Brief 53 and the Executive Summary are downloadable free of charge from the ISAAA website (http://www.isaaa.org). Please contact the ISAAA SEAsiaCenter to acquire a hard copy of the full version of Brief 53. ISAAA SEAsiaCenter c/o IRRI DAPO Box 7777 Metro Manila, Philippines info on iSAAA: For information about ISAAA, please contact the Center nearest you: ISAAA AmeriCenter ISAAA AfriCenter ISAAA SEAsiaCenter c/o IP CALs PO Box 70, ILRI Campus c/o IRRI B75 Mann Library Old Naivasha Road DAPO Box 7777 Cornell University Uthiru, Nairobi 00605 Metro Manila Ithaca NY 14853, U.S.A. Kenya Philippines Electronically: or email to [email protected] For Executive Summaries of all ISAAA Briefs, please visit http://www.isaaa.org Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures ii Biosafety Policy Developments 90 Introduction 1 Technology Demand 90 Global Area of Biotech Crops in 2017 3 Partnerships Emerging in Africa 91 Distribution of Biotech Crops in 3 European Union 92 Industrial and Developing Countries Spain 94 Distribution of Biotech Crops, by 5 Portugal 95 Country Challenges of Biotech Crops in 96 Economic Benefits of Biotech Crops 8 the EU Country Chapters Benefits from Biotech Maize in 100 Top Ten Biotech Crop Countries 9 the EU United States of America 9 Summary and Future Prospects 100 Brazil 16 in the EU Argentina 20 Distribution of Biotech Crops: by Crop 100 Canada 24 Biotech soybean area is 50% of the 100 India 29 global biotech area Paraguay 34 Biotech maize area slightly 102 Pakistan 37 decreased in 2017 China 42 Biotech cotton adoption increased 102 South Africa 46 by 8% Bolivia 50 Biotech canola area increased by 103 Latin America 52 19% Uruguay 52 Biotech alfalfa HarvXtra™ area 103 Mexico 55 increased by 295% Colombia 57 Other biotech crops 103 Honduras 60 Distribution of Biotech Crops, by Trait 104 Chile 61 Trends in Biotech Crop Approvals 1992- 106 Costa Rica 62 2017 Future Prospects for Latin 63 Biotech Crop Importing Countries 108 America Biotechnology Addresses Global Food 108 Asia and the Pacific 64 Insecurity: Now and Into the Future Australia 64 Global Value of Biotech Crop Seeds 122 Philippines 68 Soared to US$17.2 Billion, GMO Myanmar 71 Crops and Seeds Market Revenue to Vietnam 75 Increase by 10.5% in 2025 Bangladesh 77 Opportunity Costs without Global 124 Future Prospects for Asia and 82 Biotech Crops the Pacific Delayed Benefits of Public Sector 126 The African Continent 83 Biotech Crops Sudan 84 Closing Comments and Conclusion 132 Progress with Biotech Crops 86 Acknowledgments 136 Research in Other African References 137 Countries Appendix 143 i List of Tables and Figures TABlES Table 1. Global Area of Biotech Crops, 22 Years, 1996 to 2017 Table 2. Global Area of Biotech Crops, 2015 and 2017: Industrialized and Developing Countries (Million Hectares) Table 3. Global Area of Biotech Crops in 2016 and 2017: by Country (Million Hectares**) Table 4. Total and Trait Hectares of Biotech Maize in the USA, 2016-2017 Table 5. Total and Trait Hectares of Biotech Cotton in the USA, 2016-2017 Table 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mon-810-Pollen
    mon-810-pollen Organisation: Dr. Steisslinger Consulting Country: Germany Type: Consultant a. Assessment: 3. Environmental risk assessment GMO plants do not belong into the environment!!! Safety has never been properly established. I oppose vehemntly any relaease into the environment. Organisation: E3D Country: France Type: Association a. Assessment: Molecular characterisation The implanted genes are truncated and therefore their expression is not identical to that produced and expressed by Bacillus Thurigensis as an insecticide. b. Food Safety Assessment: Toxicology No studies covering a period longer than three months have ever been produced by the breeder (Monsanto). A study over at least two years should have been necessary for the maize to gain appoval. Why is the pollen not tested over two years? Allergenicity Ditto Nutritional assessment Substantial equivalence is a complete fraud, accepted by the ..... of the US Food and Drug Administration. Why? 3. Environmental risk assessment No studies have ever been produced by Monsanto. 4. Conclusions and recommendations Definitive prohibition of any GMO on which a full study spanning at least two years (rats) has not been conducted. 6. Labelling proposal Irelevant. Organisation: Conservation Engineering Ltd Country: United Kingdom Type: Individual a. Assessment: 4. Conclusions and recommendations Please keep GM pollen out of the EU. Reject this proposal and application Organisation: Testbiotech Country: Germany Type: Non Profit Organisation a. Assessment: Molecular characterisation The EFSA risk assessment suffers from a lack of data on the actual Bt content in pollen. The original data from Monsanto are around 20 years old. Since then only very few data were made available. Further, the methods for measuring the Bt content were never evaluated for reliability and comparability (Szecaks, et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance of the National Public in Vitro Potato Collection
    Maintenance of the National public in vitro potato collection Dr Nigel Crump Victorian Certified Seed Potato Authority Inc Project Number: PT12007 PT12007 This report is published by Horticulture Australia Ltd to pass on information concerning horticultural research and development undertaken for the potato industry. The research contained in this report was funded by Horticulture Australia Ltd with the financial support of: the potato industry the potato industry All expressions of opinion are not to be regarded as expressing the opinion of Horticulture Australia Ltd or any authority of the Australian Government. The Company and the Australian Government accept no responsibility for any of the opinions or the accuracy of the information contained in this report and readers should rely upon their own enquiries in making decisions concerning their own interests. ISBN 0 7341 3229 8 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Australia Ltd Level 7 179 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2013 Maintenance of the National public in vitro potato collection Horticulture Australia Project PT12007 June 2013 Horticulture Australia Project PT12007 N.S.Crump June 2013 ViCSPA Private Mail Bag 1 Healesville 3777 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the input of many industry representations including: Seed Potato Victoria, Processing Potato Association of Australia, Western Australia Seed Producers Association, Snack Brands Australia. Specially, Ian Simpson (Agtec Agriculture), Dale Spencer (WA), Colin Ayres (WA Grower), Mike Davies (APL WA), Luke Raggatt (AUSVEG), Leonie White (TIA, Tasmania), Brad Mills (HAL), David Carter, (Accredited lab – minituber producer), Kim Weir (NSW grower), Corina Horstra (VICSPA), Colin Birch (TIA, Tasmania), David Hotchkin (President VFF Thorpdale branch) Kay Spierings (Chair VICSPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the French Comimission Du Genie Biomoleculaire
    Submission to the French Comimission du Genie Biomoleculaire Application to Place on the Market Genetically Modified Higher Plants: Insect-Protected Maize (MON 810) by Monsanto Company represented by Monsanto Europe S.A. List of Abbreviations 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid APHIS Animal Plant Health Inspection Service bp, Kb Base pairs, kilobase pairs B. t.h. Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki CaMV Cauliflower mosaic virus CaMVV E35S 35S promoter with enhancer sequence from CaMV CFR U S. Code of federal regulations CP4 EPSPS EPSPS from Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4 cry JA(b) C"lass I (Lepidoptera-specific) crystal protein gene CTP Chloroplast transit peptide E. coli Escherichica colt ECB European corn borer ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPSPS 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration GLP Good Laboratory Practices GMO Genetically Modified Organism gox Gene for glyphosate oxidoreductase GOX Glyphosate oxidoreductase hsp70 Intron sequence from maize heat-shock protein 70 IPM Integrated Pest Management kD Kilodaltons N.A. Not analysed N.D. Not detected NOS 3' 3' transcriptional termination sequence from nopaline synthase NPTII Neomycin phosphotransferase II np tll Gene for neomycin phosphotransferase II 0 ri-p UC Bacterial origin of replication from the pUC plasmid PCR Polymerase chain reaction ppm parts per million SSUIA small subunit gene of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase USDA United States Department of Agriculture W/W weight/weight 2 Table of Contents PART A: GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Details of notification ................ .. 7 2. Notifier/manufacturer/importer........ ........ 7 3. Characterization of the GMOs contained in the product.....
    [Show full text]
  • Soybean Gene Zoo (2018)
    Seeds from all soybean are all edible varieties soybean from Seeds Soybean seeds are rich sources of both protein and oil. oil. and protein are both rich of sources seeds Soybean varieties Soybean T Glycine soja Demonstration of special uses special of Demonstration Demonstration the of use biotech of Demonstration soybean of he USDA began organized saturated and more than 60% than and are polyunsaturated. more saturated contains oil Soy consumption. human for used is seeds lower than normal for saturated, developed.been rations for hogs, poultry, and cattle. Many higher amounts of monounsaturated fatty acids (protein) soybean varieties. those of modern than smaller are much released under the Xtend® the under released plants. to soybean a herbicide of nonselective application emergence beans for food. food. for beans texture and strong odor and taste. taste. and odor strong and texture fermented product proteinhigh with content. Fermentation is facilitated by the bacterium or flavor clear hila. have food soybeans grade resistance trait 2Yield®) Ready Roundup and Ready® Roundup (e.g. MU Gene Zoo displays displays Zoo Gene MU Soybeanbreeding varieties. new soyb USA of 75% nearly 1944, By II. introductions Clark Glycine Soja (background) mid MG 00 fill Clark (background) and 10.7 pounds of crude oil. oil. crude of pounds 10.7 and odor is t Mukden is glabrous he wild progenitor of soybean. The plant is a vine that twines around other plants and structures for support. Leaflets China intro on its own and is often added to other foods. foods. other to added often is and own its on (LibertyLink®) early MG 1 fill The scar where the seed is attached to the pod is called a hilum.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Authorization of NK603 × MON 810 Maize for Cultivation in the European Union Under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on Genetically Modified Food and Feed
    Application for authorization of NK603 × MON 810 maize for cultivation in the European Union under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed Part II Summary October 2005 Part II - Summary A. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Details of application a) Member State of application The Netherlands b) Notification number Not known at the time of application c) Name of the product (commercial and other names) The Monsanto development code for this genetically modified maize is: NK603 × MON 810. NK603 × MON 810 varieties are marketed under the name of the hybrid variety, in association with the trademarks YieldGard ® Corn Borer with Roundup Ready ® Corn 2, indicating clearly to growers that the hybrid is protected from specific lepidopteran insect pests and that it is tolerant to Roundup ® herbicide. d) Date of acknowledgement of notification Not known at the time of application 2. Applicant a) Name of applicant Monsanto Company, represented by Monsanto Europe S.A./N.V. b) Address of applicant Monsanto Europe S.A./N.V. Monsanto Company Avenue de Tervuren 270-272 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard B-1150 Brussels St. Louis, Missouri 63167 BELGIUM U.S.A c) Name and address of the person established in the Community who is responsible for the placing on the market, whether it be the manufacturer, the importer or the distributor, if different from the applicant (Commission Decision 2004/204/EC Art 3(a)(ii)) NK603 × MON 810 maize 1 will be cultivated, traded and used in the European Union in the same manner as current commercial maize and by the same growers and operators currently involved in the planting, trade and use of traditional maize.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Monitoring Report on the Cultivation of MON 810 in 2008
    Annual Monitoring Report on the Cultivation of MON 810 in 2008 Czech Republic, Germany, Portugal, Slovakia, Poland, Romania and Spain Submitted by MONSANTO EUROPE S.A. Dept. Regulatory Affairs Avenue de Tervuren 270-272 Tervurenlaan 270-272 B-1150 Brussels BELGIUM VOLUME 1 OF 1 July 2009 Data protection. This application contains scientific data and other information which are protected in accordance with Art. 31 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003. © 2009 Monsanto Company. All Rights Reserved. This document is protected under copyright law. This document is for use only by the regulatory authority to which this has been submitted by Monsanto Company, and only in support of actions requested by Monsanto Company. Any other use of this material, without prior written consent of Monsanto Company, is strictly prohibited. By submitting this document, Monsanto Company does not grant any party or entity any right to license, or to use the information of intellectual property described in this document. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2008, Bt maize was planted in the EU on 107,719 hectares across seven countries (James, 2008). As part of stewardship of the technology, industry has implemented an Insect Resistance Management (IRM) plan to proactively avoid and/or delay the potential development of pest resistance to the Cry protein, as well as a voluntary general surveillance monitoring program. The adherence to these stewardship measures in the context of the cultivation of MON 810 maize in Europe is detailed in the Annual Monitoring Report on the Cultivation of MON 810 in 2008. The planting of MON 810 in the 2008 season was accompanied by a rigorous IRM plan involving three main elements: refuge implementation, monitoring and farmer education.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Agricultural Biotechnology Annual Canada
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Required Report - public distribution Date: 12/21/2017 GAIN Report Number: CA17042 Canada Agricultural Biotechnology Annual 2017 Approved By: Evan Mangino, Agricultural Attaché Prepared By: Erin Danielson, Agricultural Specialist Alexandrea Watters, Agricultural Specialist Report Highlights: The first commercial sales of products of a genetically engineered animal, the AquAdvantage salmon, occurred in Canada in 2017. Canadian genetically engineered crop area is estimated at 12.53 million hectares for 2017, up 17 percent from 2016. Canola area reached a record high in 2017, surpassing wheat area for the first time ever. Since the 2016 annual biotechnology report, Canada has approved five new genetically engineered crop varieties: three potatoes and two corn. Keywords: agriculture, biotechnology, CA17042, Canada, GE, genetically engineered REPORT OUTLINE Section I: Executive Summary Section II: Plant and Animal Biotechnology CHAPTER 1: PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY PART A: Production and Trade PART B: Policy PART C: Marketing CHAPTER 2: ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY PART D: Production and Trade PART E: Policy PART F: Marketing Section I. Executive Summary In 2017, Canada planted approximately12.5 million hectares of genetically engineered (GE) crops, mainly canola, soybeans, corn, sugar beets and some alfalfa. Canada ranked fourth in the most recent International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) global ranking of area planted with GE crops. In May and August 2017, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and Health Canada approved the unconfined environmental release of two Syngenta GE corn products for commercial planting purposes, livestock feed and food use.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Potato - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Log in / create account Article Talk Read View source View history Our updated Terms of Use will become effective on May 25, 2012. Find out more. Main page Potato Contents From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Featured content Current events "Irish potato" redirects here. For the confectionery, see Irish potato candy. Random article For other uses, see Potato (disambiguation). Donate to Wikipedia The potato is a starchy, tuberous crop from the perennial Solanum tuberosum Interaction of the Solanaceae family (also known as the nightshades). The word potato may Potato Help refer to the plant itself as well as the edible tuber. In the region of the Andes, About Wikipedia there are some other closely related cultivated potato species. Potatoes were Community portal first introduced outside the Andes region four centuries ago, and have become Recent changes an integral part of much of the world's cuisine. It is the world's fourth-largest Contact Wikipedia food crop, following rice, wheat and maize.[1] Long-term storage of potatoes Toolbox requires specialised care in cold warehouses.[2] Print/export Wild potato species occur throughout the Americas, from the United States to [3] Uruguay. The potato was originally believed to have been domesticated Potato cultivars appear in a huge variety of [4] Languages independently in multiple locations, but later genetic testing of the wide variety colors, shapes, and sizes Afrikaans of cultivars and wild species proved a single origin for potatoes in the area
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostic Test Kits Catalogue – 2021 Catalogue Kits Test Diagnostic Technologies Eurofins
    Catalogue 2021 EUROFINS TECHNOLOGIES DIAGNOSTIC TEST KITS CATALOGUE – 2021 CATALOGUE KITS TEST DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES EUROFINS Diagnostic Test Kits Food, Feed, Animal Health and Environmental Analysis Diagnostic Test Kits Catalogue 2021 Food, Feed, Animal Health and Environmental Analysis Dilution buffer Wash solution Stop Solution Conjugate Standards Microtiter plate Substrate EUROFINS TECHNOLOGIES | 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Eurofins Technologies Contacts and Locations ...6 MYCOTOXINS..................... 25 VETERINARY DRUG ANIMAL SPECIES .............. 65 RESIDUES AND ADDITIVES .. 49 Eurofins Technologies Mycotoxin Kits ..........25 Eurofins Technologies Animal Species Kits ..65 ALLERGENS ........................ 9 B ZERO® Quantitative ELISA Test Kits ........25 Eurofins Technologies Veterinary Drug DNAnimal Kits ..........................................66 Celer® Quantitative ELISA Test Kits ............26 Residues and Additives Kits .......................49 Meat Standards ........................................67 Eurofins Technologies Allergen Kits...............9 Water-based Quantitative ELISA Test Kits ....26 l’Screen Quantitative ELISA Test Kits..........50 Control DNAs ............................................67 SENSISpec Allergen Detection ELISA Kits ..10 l’Screen Quantitative ELISA Test Kits..........27 B ZERO® Quantitative ELISA Test Kits ........50 Supplementary Products ............................10 SENSIColumn Immunoaffinity Columns ......27 Other Kits to Detect Veterinary Drug SENSISpec Gluten Detection ELISA Kits.....11
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Arctic Apples
    An Overview of Arctic Apples: Basic Facts and Characteristics Kenong Xu Department of Horticulture Cornell University, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Geneva, NY pple fruits turn brown quickly after being sliced or bitten. How Are the Activities of PPOs Reduced in Arctic Apples? Although this is a natural phenomenon, browning has One of the commonly used methods in reducing the activity been considered as an undesirable trait that often discour- of a specific enzyme in living cells is to suppress the expression of A ages consumption mRNA from the gene targeted. There are several means scientists “Arctic Golden Delicious and Artic Granny and causes unnec- can use to achieve specific gene expression suppression. OSF took an Smith Apples, which are genetically essary waste. To approach called co-suppression, a technique that allows specifically address the long modified varieties that do not brown suppressing mRNA from one or more target genes depending upon standing issue of the DNA sequences. One required element for this technique, obvi- when cut, will be available for commercial fruit browning in ously, is DNA sequence information for gene(s) targeted. Another planting once deregulated. This article apple, Okanagan element is that a second copy (partial or complete) of the target describes the relevant scientific Specialty Fruits gene(s) is transformed into cells and expressed at high levels. Such background and facts about these apples (OSF), a Canadi- high level expression of the transgene will trigger a process called so that growers can make an informed an firm located in RNA interference (RNAi) that will chop mRNA from both the target British Columbia decision on whether or not to grow Arctic gene and the transgene into small pieces to kill the mRNA, leading that is funded by to co-suppression of their mRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.)
    United Kingdom National List / Plant Breeders’ Rights Technical Protocol for the Official Examination of Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) February 2020 Contents Section A - General Information ..................................................................................................... 1 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 1 2 Scope ................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Responsibilities ................................................................................................................. 1 4 Non Compliance with the Protocol .................................................................................... 3 5 Responsibility for GM Releases ........................................................................................ 3 6 Procedures for GM Varieties ............................................................................................. 3 7 Associated Documents ...................................................................................................... 4 Section B – Application Requirements ........................................................................................... 5 1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 5 2 Scope ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Biotechnology: Facilitating Trade for Food and Feed Sharon Bomer Lauritsen Assistant U.S
    Agricultural Biotechnology: Facilitating Trade for Food and Feed Sharon Bomer Lauritsen Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, Agriculture North American Agricultural Biotechnology Council June 2, 2015 1 Outline Agricultural Biotechnology in U.S. and Global Agriculture Issues Affecting Agricultural Trade U.S. Government Approaches to Trade and Agricultural Biotechnology 2 Biotech Crop Countries and Mega-Countries*, 2014 I S A A A 3 Global Adoption Rates (%) for Principal Biotech Crops, 2014 I S A A A M Acres 494 200 184 445 180 Conventional 395 160 Biotech 346 140 111 296 120 247 100 198 80 140 60 37 36 99 40 49 20 0 0 82% 68% 30% 25% Soybean Cotton Maize Canola 4 Source: Clive James, 2014 Hectarage based on FAO Preliminary Data for 2012. Global Area of Biotech Crops, 1996 to 2014: By Crop (Million I S A A A Hectares, Million Acres) M Acres 247 100 222 90 Soybean 198 80 Maize 173 70 Cotton Canola 148 60 124 50 99 40 74 30 49 20 25 10 0 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 5 Source: Clive James, 2014 Global Area of Biotech Crops, 1996 to 2014: Industrial and Developing Countries I S A A A M Acres 494 200 445 180 Total Industrial 395 160 Developing 346 140 296 120 247 100 198 80 148 60 99 40 49 20 00 6 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Source: Clive James, 2014 Biotechnology and Trade 120 Biotechnology: Trade in % global trade from GE producers: 2012/13 Major Crops, 2012/13 100 120 100 80 global trade 80 60 share of 60 global trade 40 from GE producers 40 20 20 0 0 soybeans corn cotton canola soybeans corn cotton canola 7 Source: Brooks and Barfoot, 2014 RTA Expansion 1975 8 Source: IDB Integration and Trade Sector based on INTrade.
    [Show full text]