DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Elections 92: Election Results for the U.S. President, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Elections 92: Election Results for the U.S. President, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House FEDERAL ELECTIONS 92 Election Results for the U.S. President, the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. June 1993 Commissioners Scott E. Thomas, Chairman Trevor Potter, Vice Chairman Joan D. Aikens Lee Ann Elliott Danny L. McDonald John Warren McGarry Ex Officio Commissioners Donnald K. Anderson, Clerk of the House Walter J. Stewart, Secretary of the Senate Statutory Officers John C. Surina, Staff Director Lawrence M. Noble, General Counsel Compiled by Patricia A. Klein Deputy Assistant Staff Director for Disclosure Printed by the Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. 20463 June 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface 1 I. 1992 General Election 3 • Table: 1992 General Election Votes Cast for 5 President, Senate, House A. United States President 7 • Table: 1992 Popular Vote Summary 9 • Table: 1992 Electoral and Popular Vote Summary 10 • Map: 1992 Electoral Vote Distribution 11 • Map: 1992 Popular Vote: Clinton 12 • Map: 1992 Popular Vote: Bush 13 • Map: 1992 Popular Vote: Perot 14 • Official General Election Results by State 15 B. Unites States Senate 33 • Map: 1992 Senate Victors 35 • Map: 1992 U.S. Senate Campaigns 36 • Official General Election Results by State 37 • Table: Senate Races: Six Year Cycle 43 C. United States House of Representatives 45 • Map: 1992 House Delegations 47 • Map: 1992 Redistricting for the U.S. House 48 • Official General Election Results by State 49 II. 1992 Presidential Primary 99 • Official Primary Election Results by State 101 III. Guide to Party Labels 119 .:,.. ELECTION RESULTS FOR THE U.S. PRESIDENT, U.S. SENATE AND THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES The following official election results for the U.S. Presidential, Senatorial and Congressional elections held on November 3, 1992, have been prepared by the Federal Election Commission. The Commission undertakes this project biennially in order to respond to public inquiries it receives. Recognizing a need to bring together in one place all the Federal election results, the Commission presents this publication as the sixth in a series designed to provide an accurate, historical record of Federal election results. Also included in the publication for the first time are the official election results for the U.S. Presidential primaries that 39 states, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, held in 1992. This section supercedes the publication 1992 Presidential Primary Election Results issued in August 1992. Data is based on official figures provided by State election officials, and includes several updates through June 24, 1993. If the election results are modified in the future, the Commission will supply errata supplements as necessary. The assistance provided by the State election officials and their staff in gathering this data is greatly appreciated. Notes: • For each state, the terms used in its entry are the ones that appear on the tally of the official election results. • Write-in votes are shown as disclosed by the state. Some states list the names of candidates who received write-in votes, while others provide a write-in vote total without the names of the candidates who received the votes. Still other states combine these two variations and provide the names of some candidates who received write-in votes and a total of write-in votes for all the other candidates. • Election results for the California Senate special election, New York 8th district special election and North Carolina 1st district special election, held on November 3, 1992, are included in the vote totals. • "Total Votes" represents all the valid votes cast for the candidates in the election. • The percentage of votes received by each candidate is based on the figure of total votes. This publication has been prepared as a research tool for Commission staff and State election offices. Additional copies may be ordered from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. -1- 1992 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS The following three sections present the general election results for the U.S. President, Senate and House elections held on November 3, 1993. The data shows that over 104 million people cast a vote in the Presidential election. 1992 GENERAL ELECTION VOTES CAST FOR PRESIDENT, SENATE, HOUSE State Presidential Vote Senate Vote House Vote AL 1,688,060 1,577,799 1,602,536 AK 258,506 239,714 239,116 AS 12,355 AZ 1,486,975 1,382,051 1,408,921 AR 950,653 920,008 888,521 CA 11,131,721 21,582,446 * 10,535,065 co 1,569,18 1,552,289 1,479,209 CT 1,616,332 1,500,709 1,435,163 DE 289,735 276,157 DC 227,572 196,754 FL 5,314,492 4,962,290 4,909,937 GA 2,321,125 2,251,587 2,213,987 GU 33,383 HI 372' 842 363,662 358,431 ID 482,142 478,522 472,747 IL 5,050,157 4,939,558 4,830,941 IN 2,305,871 2,211,426 2,028,976 IA 1,354,607 1,292,494 1,242,436 KS 1,157,236 1,126,447 1,124,915 KY 1,492,900 1,330,858 1,360, 911 LA 1,790,017 843,037 1,105,533 ME 679,499 669,51:11 MD 1,985,046 1,841,735 1,807,507 MA 2, 773,664 2,614,229 MI 4,274,673 3,884,403 MN 2,347,947 2,274,413 MS 981,793 964,144 MO 2,391,565 2,354,925 2,348,560 MT 410,611 403,735 NE 739,283 710,835 NV 506,318 495,887 491,949 NH 537,945 518,423 511,040 NJ 3,343,594 2,991,739 NM 569,986 555,601 NY 6,926,933 6,458,826 6,075,975 * NC 2,611,850 2,577,891 2,740,273 * ND 308,133 303,957 297,898 OH 4,939,964 4,803,956 4,576,934 OK 1,390,359 1,294,423 1,275,696 OR 1,462,643 1,376,033 1,390,754 PA 4,959,810 4,802,410 4,590,519 PR 1,858,715 RI 453,478 398,502 sc 1,202,527 1,180,438 1,115,450 SD 336,254 334,495 332,902 TN 1,982,638 1' 725,674 TX 6,154,018 5,622,472 UT 743,999 758,479 727,284 VT 289,701 285,739 281,626 VA 2,558,665 2,368,047 VI 22,997 'WA 2,288,228 2,218,802 2,223,014 w 683,711 562,706 'WI 2,531,114 2,455,124 2,387,930 'WY 200,587 197,025 Total: 104,426,659 71,828,239 98,756,123 * Total includes votes cast in special election held 11/3/92. -5- . I Z66t '£ HaHHHAON lNHG1SaHd sa~v~s aa~INn ~Od S~1flSaH N01~3H13 ~VHaNa~ ~131440 1992 POPULAR VOTE SUHKARY FOR ALL CANDIDATES LISTED ON AT LEAST ONE STATE BALLOT Candidate (Party Label) Po~ular Vote Total Percent of Po~ular Vote Bill Clinton (Democrat) 44,909,889 43.01 George Bush (Republican) 39,104,545 37.45 Ross Perot (Independent) 19,742,267 18.91 Andre Marrou (Libertarian) 291,628 .28 James "Bo" Gritz (Populist/America First) 107,002 .10 Lenora Fulani (New Alliance) 73,708 .07 Howard Phillips (U.S. Taxpayers) 43,398 .04 John Hagelin (Natural Law) 39,163 .04 Ron Daniels (Independent) 27,969 .03 Lyndon LaRouche (Independent) 26,334 .02 James Mac Yarren (Socialist Yorkers) 23,091 .02 Drew Bradford (Independent) 4,749 .00 Jack Herer (Grassroots) 3,875 .00 John Quinn Brisben (Socialist) 3,064 .00 Helen Halyard (Yorkers League) 3,050 .00 John Yiamouyiannis (Independent) 2,199 .00 Delbert Ehlers (Independent) 1,149 .00 Earl Dodge (Prohibition) 961 .00 Jim Boren (Apathy) 956 .00 Eugene Hem (Third Party) 405 .00 Isabelle Masters (Looking Back Group) 339 .00 Robert J. Smith (American) 293 .00 Gloria Estella La Riva (Yorkers Yorld) 181 .00 None of These Candidates (Nevada) 2,537 .00 Yrite-In (Miscellaneous) 13,907 .01 Total 104,426,659 100 Voting Age Population (Census Bureau estimate for November 1992): 189,044,000 Percent of voting age population casting a vote: 55.24% Notes: Party designations may vary from one state to another. Vote totals for the candidates listed above include any write-in votes they received. -9- 1992 ELECTORAL AND POPULAR VOTE SUMMARY STATE ELECTORAL VOTE POPULAR VOTE TOTAL POPULAR VOTE Bush Clinton Bush Clinton Perot AL 9 804,283 690,080 183,109 1,688,060 AK 3 102,000 78,294 73,481 258,506 AZ 8 572,086 543,050 .353,741 1,486,975 AR 6 337,324 505,823 99,132 950,653 CA 54 3,630,574 5,121,325 2,296,006 11,131,721 co 8 562,850 629,681 366,010 1,569,180 CT 8 578,313 682,318 348' 771. 1,616,332 DE 3 102,313 126,055 59,213 289,735 DC 3 20,698 192,619 9,681 227,572 FL 25 2,173,310 2 '072' 798 1,053,067 5, 314,492 GA 13 995,252 1,008,966 309,657 2,321,125 HI 4 136,822 179,310 53,003 372,842 ID 4 202,645 137,013 130,395 482,142 IL 22 1,734,096 2,453,350 840,515 5,050,157 IN 12 989,375 848,420 455,934 2,305,871 IA 7 504,891 586,353 253,468 1,354,607 KS 6 449,951 390,434 312,358 1,157,236 KY 8 617,178 665,104 203,944 1,492,900 LA 9 733,386 815,971 211,478 1,790,017 ME 4 206,504 263,420 206,820 679,499 MD 10 707,094 988,571 281,414 1,985,046 MA 12 805,039 1,318,639 630,731 2' 773' 664 MI 18 1,554,940 1,871,182 824,813 4,274,673 MN 10 747,841 1,020,997 562,506 2,347,947 MS 7 487,793 400,258 85,626 981,793 MO 11 811,159 1,053,873 518,741 2,391,565 MT 3 144,207 154,507 107,225 410,611 NE 5 344,346 217,344 174,687 739,283 NV 4 175,828 189,148 132,580 506,318 NH 4 202,484 209,040 121,337 537,945 NJ 15 1,356,865 1,436,206 521,829 3,343,594 NM 5 212,824 261,617 91,895 569,986 NY 33 2,346,649 3,444,450 1,090,721 6,926,933 NC 14 1,134,661 1, 114,042 357,864 2' 611' 850 ND 3 136,244 99,168 71,084 308,133 OH 21 1,894,310 1,984,942 1,036,426 4,939,964 OK 8 592,929 473,066 319,878 1,390,359 OR 7 475,757 621,314 354,091 1,462,643 PA 23 1,791,841 2,239,164 902,667 4,959,810 RI 4 131,605 213,302 105;051 453,478 sc 8 577,507 479,514 138,872 1,202,527 SD 3 136,718 124,888 73,295 336,254 TN 11 841,300 933,521 199,968 1,982,638 TX 32 2,496,071 2,281,815 1,354,781 6,154,018 UT 5 322,632 183,429 203,400 743,999 VT 3 88,122 133,592 65,991 289,701 VA 13 1,150,517 1,038,650 348,639 2,558,665 WA 11 731,235 993,039 541,801 2,288,228 wv 5 241,974 331,001 108,829 683' 711 WI 11 930,855 1,041,066 544,479 2,531,114 WY 3 79,347 68,160 51,263 200,587 Total: 168 370 39,104,545 44,909,889 19,742,267 104,426,659 Note: Total electoral vote = 538.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix File Anes 1988‐1992 Merged Senate File
    Version 03 Codebook ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ CODEBOOK APPENDIX FILE ANES 1988‐1992 MERGED SENATE FILE USER NOTE: Much of his file has been converted to electronic format via OCR scanning. As a result, the user is advised that some errors in character recognition may have resulted within the text. MASTER CODES: The following master codes follow in this order: PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE CAMPAIGN ISSUES MASTER CODES CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP CODE ELECTIVE OFFICE CODE RELIGIOUS PREFERENCE MASTER CODE SENATOR NAMES CODES CAMPAIGN MANAGERS AND POLLSTERS CAMPAIGN CONTENT CODES HOUSE CANDIDATES CANDIDATE CODES >> VII. MASTER CODES ‐ Survey Variables >> VII.A. Party/Candidate ('Likes/Dislikes') ? PARTY‐CANDIDATE MASTER CODE PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PEOPLE WITHIN PARTY 0001 Johnson 0002 Kennedy, John; JFK 0003 Kennedy, Robert; RFK 0004 Kennedy, Edward; "Ted" 0005 Kennedy, NA which 0006 Truman 0007 Roosevelt; "FDR" 0008 McGovern 0009 Carter 0010 Mondale 0011 McCarthy, Eugene 0012 Humphrey 0013 Muskie 0014 Dukakis, Michael 0015 Wallace 0016 Jackson, Jesse 0017 Clinton, Bill 0031 Eisenhower; Ike 0032 Nixon 0034 Rockefeller 0035 Reagan 0036 Ford 0037 Bush 0038 Connally 0039 Kissinger 0040 McCarthy, Joseph 0041 Buchanan, Pat 0051 Other national party figures (Senators, Congressman, etc.) 0052 Local party figures (city, state, etc.) 0053 Good/Young/Experienced leaders; like whole ticket 0054 Bad/Old/Inexperienced leaders; dislike whole ticket 0055 Reference to vice‐presidential candidate ? Make 0097 Other people within party reasons Card PARTY ONLY ‐‐ PARTY CHARACTERISTICS 0101 Traditional Democratic voter: always been a Democrat; just a Democrat; never been a Republican; just couldn't vote Republican 0102 Traditional Republican voter: always been a Republican; just a Republican; never been a Democrat; just couldn't vote Democratic 0111 Positive, personal, affective terms applied to party‐‐good/nice people; patriotic; etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on the Death of Representative Julian C. Dixon The
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 2000 / Dec. 9 So I’m going to try to be a good citizen, good years, but if we build on it instead of and I’m going to try to help work on the things reverse it, it’s just going to get better. that I worked on as President as a private citizen But keep in mind, I will say again: It’s more but to do it in a way that doesn’t get under important that the people be pushing toward foot of the next President. And I have loved tomorrow than who has a particular office. As doing this. But the most important thing is that long as we’re open to the proposition we have people like you stay active in our party and to keep working; and we have to keep working keep pushing us to be thinking about tomorrow. together; everybody counts; everybody deserves Just keep pushing us toward the future, keep a chance; we all do better when we work to- moving, and keep reaching out like a magnet. gether. That’s what the Democrats believe, and And again, I would like to thank Ben. I would if we keep doing it, we’re going to be just fine. like to thank Bob Kerrey for the 8 years that Thank you, and God bless you. we have worked together, President and Sen- ator, and the many years of friendship before that. I want to thank Peter Hoagland, who came down from Washington with us today, for the NOTE: The President spoke at 3:38 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Spectator
    The WA S H I N G T O N washingtonspectator.org MARCH/APRIL 2021 vol. 47, no. 2 issn 0887-428x SPECTATOR © 2021 The Public Concern Foundation washingtonspectator.org in the weeks and months leading up to the Capitol insurrection. All Enemies, Foreign and Any talk of conspiracy theories these days tends to conjure the lurid delusions of QAnon, of Satanic child sex traffickers huddled Domestic: The Road From in the basement of a Washington pizza parlor. But a major-league conspiracy theory has to rest on a much more coherent intellec- Vietnam to the Capitol Steps tual framework, one that grows out of plausible if debatable com- By George Black plaints and critiques and then thrives and mutates in the fertile soil of unacknowledged grievances. Behind the tabloid headlines atching the mob surge toward the steps about Hillary’s emails or Hunter Biden’s laptop are the machina- of the Capitol on January 6, it was hard not to wonder tions of a malignant global elite, bent on the destruction of the W whether the United States was any longer a nation or United States and the creation of a New World Order. These had degenerated into what a Turkish diplomat, speaking about ideas have their roots in the misdirected patriotism and deep the Middle East, once famously described as a warring collec- veins of paranoia in American politics, in the anti-communism tion of “tribes with flags.” The crowd seethed with flags and ban- of the John Birch Society, the radio broadcasts of Father Charles ners: Stars and Stripes Coughlin, and the as big as panel trucks, Cold War witch hunts some with the superim- of Senator Joseph posed head of Donald McCarthy.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(S)
    P-2/P-5 Document Report (George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(s) 5615 Chief of Staff to the President, Office Brady, Philip D. Memo Roger B. Porter to the President 3 P-5 of the Re: Meeting with Prime Minister Kaifu 5625 Chief of Staff to the President, Office Brady, Philip D. Note Phillip D. Brady to Patty Presock 1 P-5 of the Re: Attached Letter 8649 Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) Schmalensee, Richard Memo Dick Schmalensee to Michael Boskin 1 P-5 Re: Potential SPR Scandal 8650 Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) Schmalensee, Richard Memo Dick Schmalensee to Michael Boskin 1 P-5 Re: SPR Sales Meeting 8651 Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) Schmalensee, Richard Memo Dick Schmalensee to Michael Boskin 1 P-5 Re: Watkins/Sununu Meeting Tuesday on SPR Sales 8652 Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) Schmalensee, Richard Memo Dick Schmalensee to Michael Boskin 1 P-5 Re: Our Lack of an SPR Strategy Page 1 of 136 P-2/P-5 Document Report (George Bush Library - Staff and Office Files) NLGB Control # White House Office White House Staff Member Document Type Subject Pages Restriction(s) 9556 Counsel to the President, Office of Gray, C. Boyden Memo From Ross Starek to Jane Dannenhauer 1 P-2, P-5, (b)(6) Re: Name Checks (redaction of social security numbers and unsuccessful candidate information) [FOIA RESTRICTIONS REDACTED] 16371 Counsel to the President, Office of Liberman, Lee S. Notes Lee Liberman handwritten notes 34 P-5, (b)(6) Re: Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings [FOIA RESTRICTIONS REDACTED] 16375 Counsel to the President, Office of Liberman, Lee S.
    [Show full text]
  • Races to Watch for Supporters of Immigration Reform Senate Edition
    RACES TO WATCH FOR SUPPORTERS OF IMMIGRATION REFORM SENATE EDITION September 2012 ARIZONA (OPEN) FLORIDA (NELSON-D) MASSACHUSETTS (BROWN-R) NEVADA (HELLER-R) NEW MEXICO (OPEN) VIRGINIA (OPEN) 1 State: Arizona (open) Candidates: Richard Carmona (D) v. Rep. Jeff Flake (R) Rating: Lean Republican (Cook Political Report, 9/24/12) Latino Voters: 18.4% (see LatinoVoteMap.org) Arizona’s Jeff Flake used to be a champion of comprehensive immigration reform, leading the effort to push for common sense solutions in the U.S. House of Representatives in the mid- 2000s. However, Flake tacked right during the Senate primary, following the playbook of Senator John McCain in his transformation between the push for comprehensive reform in 2007 and the Republican presidential primary in 2008. Flake went so far as to vote against the DREAM Act in 2010. But the Congressman might not have gotten the memo: in the two years since the Arizona legislature passed SB 1070, voters have begun to realize that immigrant- bashing is distracting and destructive. SB 1070’s lead sponsor, State Senate President Russell Pearce, was kicked out of office in an unprecedented recall election in 2011—then defeated again in 2012. Furthermore, advocates and community leaders are working hard to ensure that Latinos (who measure 30.1% of Arizona’s population and 18.4% of its voter base) and immigrants in Arizona show resilience in the face of anti-immigrant bullying by showing up at the polls. If Carmona is able to beat Flake, it will be due to turnout of Latino voters. Jan Brewer and Joe Arpaio will be represented in the Senate by a vocal supporter of comprehensive immigration reform and the DREAM Act—and it might prove that the head-in-the-sand anti-immigrant fad of the last few years has finally worn out its welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jersey Hustle
    December 15, 2013 Opinion: The Jersey hustle OLDER New Jerseyans may well remember the basis of a new film — “American Hustle” — that opened last Friday. It is a fictionalized account of Abscam, the FBI stinG operation in the late 1970s and early 1980s that resulted in the conviction of three key New Jersey politicians, includinG a U.S. senator, a state senator and a member of the House of Representatives, as well as several other officials on charges including bribery and conspiracy. Abscam put New Jersey on the map as hotbed of political corruption, a reputation that we maintain today. The movie, directed by Philadelphia native David O. Russell, tells the story of a clever con man, IrvinG Rosenfeld, and his partner, Sydney Prosser, who are forced to infiltrate the wild arena of New Jersey politics and orGanized crime in the 1970s by FBI aGent Richie DiMaso. “American Hustle,” which last Thursday picked up seven Golden Globe nominations includinG best movie, actor and director, is a “fictionalized” account of “Abdul Scam” or Abscam, the FBI stinG operation, which consisted of a fictional middle eastern sheikh named Karim Abdul Rahman (thus the “Abdul” scam moniker) offerinG bribes to political leaders in eXchanGe for political asylum, money launderinG and investment opportunities. The real-life con man that the FBI hires to play the sheik, Melvin WeinberG, is the character IrvinG Rosenfeld in the film, played by Christian Bale. Included in the corruption miX were New Jersey’s Sen. Harrison A. Williams, Rep. Frank Thompson Jr., and Camden Mayor AnGelo Errichetti, all of whom were convicted and served prison time for acceptinG bribes and conspiracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cbs News/New York Times Poll the Democratic Nomination
    CBS NEWS/NEW YORK TIMES POLL THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION September 28 – October 1, 2003 q14 How much attention have you been able to pay to the 2004 Presidential campaign -- a lot, some, not much, or no attention so far? *** REGISTERED VOTERS ** Democratic **** Party ID **** Primary Total Rep Dem Ind Voters Aug03b % % % % % % A lot 18 21 16 16 18 15 Some 41 41 41 42 43 34 Not much 29 23 32 33 31 29 No attention so far 12 15 10 9 8 21 DK/NA 0 0 1 0 0 1 q1520 (I'm going to name some possible Presidential candidates and ask what you think of them. If you haven't heard much about someone I name, just tell me.) Is your opinion of Carol Moseley Braun favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Carol Mosley Braun yet to have an opinion? Is your opinion of former Senator Carol Mosley Braun favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about former Senator Carol Mosley Braun yet to have an opinion? Favorable 5 2 8 5 8 Not favorable 16 23 9 17 9 Undecided 15 13 18 13 19 Haven’t heard enough yet 64 62 64 65 63 Refused 0 0 1 0 1 q1621 Is your opinion of Wesley Clark favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Wesley Clark yet to have an opinion? Is your opinion of General Wesley Clark favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Wesley Clark yet to have an opinion? Favorable 16 17 19 11 19 Not favorable 14 24 6 13 7 Undecided 22 18 19 30 23 Haven’t heard enough 48 42 56 46 51 Refused 0 0 0 0 0 q1722 Is your opinion of Howard Dean favorable, not favorable, undecided, or haven't you heard enough about Howard Dean yet to have an opinion? Is your opinion of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 473 027 SO 034 353 AUTHOR Lupia, Arthur; Philpot, Tasha S. TITLE More Than Kids Stuff: Can News and Information Web Sites Mobilize Young Adults? SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Washington, DC. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 33p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. (Boston, MA, August 28- September 2, 2002). CONTRACT 0094964 PUB TYPE Reports Research (143) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Internet; *Mass Media Effects; Media Research; *Presidential Campaigns (United States); *Voting; *Young Adults IDENTIFIERS News Sources; Political Communication; *Web Sites ABSTRACT Many young adults are not politically active. Since 1972, their participation and interest levels have declined not only in absolute terms but also relative to other voting-age groups. This paper examines how the Internet can reverse this trend. It focuses on how leading news and political information Web sites affected young adults during the closing weeks of the 2000 presidential election campaign. The data come from a survey that exposes citizens to Web sites under varying conditions. The data are used to document how individual sites change viewers' political interest and likely participation levels. Seemingly similar sites had dramatically different effects on young viewers. The analysis documents that sites which provide information effectively increase political interest and participation for all ages, but young and old differ significantly on which sites are effective. Findings suggest that using the Internet to increase youth political engagement entails unique, but discoverable, challenges. (Contains 21 references, 7 notes, and 4 tables.)(Author/BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2000.Xls
    GENERAL ELECTION-NOVEMBER 7, 2000 O F F I C I A L R E S U L T S Precinct Counted TOTAL Early/AB 1 2 3 45678910111213141516171920 President & Vice President George W. Bush & Dick Cheney (R) 4472 1763 150 82 93 97 137 189 103 270 134 207 268 218 203 107 143 33 47 107 121 Al Gore & Joe Lieberman (D) 4208 1490 186 189 286 136 99 237 117 182 115 153 150 111 212 107 63 9 35 179 152 Harry Browne & Art Olivier (L) 73 31 7240441330514100030 John Hagelin & Nat Goldhaber (N) 14 23003001000100002020 Ralph Nader & Winona LaDuke (G) 820 226 69 52 78 29 28 57 23 28 27 36 11 14 23 16 9 1 2 43 48 Howard Phillips & J. Curtis Frazier (A) 601000100000030100000 Pat Buchanan & Ezola Foster (F) 42 18 3120010011414121020 Earl F. Dodge & W. Dean Watkins (P) 101000000000000000000 James Harris & Margaret Trowe (SW) 100000000000000010000 David McReynolds & Mary Cal Hollis (SP) 101000000000000000000 Representative to the 107th United States Congress District 3 Curtis Imrie (D) 2881 996 116 137 219 87 80 161 89 117 73 95 109 67 151 74 55 4 21 127 103 Scott McInnis (R) 5741 2229 238 131 181 148 156 244 134 333 177 265 297 255 239 125 153 35 54 176 171 Drew Sakson (L) 282 87 26 19 21 7 10 19 2 11 6 8 9 4 19 8 4 3 0 9 10 Victor A. Good (RP) 145 46 17 398685442346230177 Secretary of State - 2 year term Donetta Davidson (R) 4531 1827 165 106 113 114 142 179 115 267 147 204 247 193 172 95 125 32 44 121 123 Anthony Martinez (D) 3260 1108 143 137 228 108 92 191 86 133 87 114 125 100 171 85 64 5 22 141 120 Clyde J.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • For the Next Few Weeks, the Knoxville
    PAGE APB The Knoxville Focus May 18, 2020 May 18, 2020 www.knoxfocus.com ONLINE AUCTIONPAGE A1 FRIDAY, May 22 The Knoxvillele Over 400 lots! See pictures at fountaincityauction.com Fountain City Auction (865)474-9931 FREE OCUS Take One! www.knoxfocus.com F May 18, 2020 Phone: 865-686-9970 | PO Box 18377, Knoxville, TN 37928 | Located at 4109 Central Avenue Pike, Knoxville, Tennessee 37912 Mark Campen, Courtney Shea KSC becomes 1:1 district as honored by Fountain City proposal 8E By Mike Steely Senior Writer contributed much to Fountain League of America. [email protected] City. This year they chose two He and his wife, Emily, have passes local residents deeply involved two children and Emily owns The Honor Fountain City Day has in preserving our environment. Flower Pot florist shop. Campen By Amy Box Fellhoelter been a Memorial Day high- The Fountain City Man and continues to address conserva- light for many years. The mem- Woman of the Year 2020 are tion issues and water quality. Mark Campen Courtney Shea Last week’s Knox County bers of Fountain City Town Hall Mark Campen and Courtney Courtney Shea came to East School Board digital meeting was have hosted the celebration of Shea. Tennessee with the Office of Sur- the CHS Foundation and her filled mostly with discussion of their community but this year Campen, a former Knoxville face Mining in 1979 and loved favorite project was the Wall of the funding and wording partic- the coronavirus pandemic has City Council member, is a UT the area so much she stayed.
    [Show full text]