Mm LIST of Doems of the Pel3wmen

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mm LIST of Doems of the Pel3wmen PERMANENTHEKDQWTERS COWTTEE mm LIST OF Doems OF THEPEl3wmEN THEADQUARTERS COMMI!wEE, ITS sm-co~ms, AND THE INTERIM cum FOR THE SELECTION OF A SITE FOR TBE PXm HEADQUARTERSOF THE UNITES NATIONS Prepared by the Documents Index Unit A. INTRODUCTION 11 Membership- The Permanent Headquartesu Committee was established as an --ad hoc Committee upon which each member of the General Assembly had the right to be represented by Resolution No, 26 (I), adopted at the eighteenth plenary meeting, 26 January 1946. 2, -.QfP1carEl The off1cors QF the Permanent Headquarters Committee during the first sa5slon wm33: Temporary Chairman at the opening of the fir& meeting, 2 February ~$46, Mr. Arthur David Kemp men (Secretariat); Chairman, ML Eduarde Zulsta Angel (Colombia), elected at the first meeting; v&y- Chairzaan, Mr. Laolyn Dana Wz&geas (Canada), elected at the first meeting; end Rapporteur, Mr. Nasrollah Entezam (Iran), elected at the first meeting. 3s SscretarZea Mr. Huntington GLlchrist was Secretary to the Permanent Headquarters p Cozmxtttse during the London part of the sess%on, and Mr. Glenn Edmund Bennett in N0w York. 4. Sub-CollIlxrdt%ees Sub-Comttss 1, to inspect and report on proposed sites, was appointed at the seventeenth meeting, 14 November 1946, Tt was composed of the Ghatrman (Colombia), the Vice-ahabman (Canada) and the Rapportew (Iran) of f;hs Cod’k’bee, and tie IUD%W?S for Australia, Belgim, Bollvia, China, Culm, EgypZ;, France, Iraq, the Netherlands, Poland, 4the &ion of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom., the United States of America, Uruguay, and Yugo0lavta. At the first meeti=, 15 November 1946, the Chairman, b /Vice-Chaimm /) &m/53 Page 2 Vice-Chair- and Rapporteur Of the Committee W3re CdJskd. to the cOmeE3pOnai~ Off iC8S in Sub-Committee 1, a, Enteza presented its report (A/SIQ$%xb J./j, a.nd Add& Add.2) to the eighteenth meeting of the Comittee~ 4 December 1946. ~02 the check list of the docments of ‘the Sub-Comittee, see &xc% B (2 > . Sub-(&-&t-&e 2, to inspect and report on the Manhattan gast River site, qqas appointed at the twenty-fifth meeting, 11 December 1$+6, It Was composed of the nine members of the Headquarters Commission (Australia, China, France, Iraq, the Netherlands, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kixdom, Uruguay, and Yugoslavia) and the representative of the United States of &nerica, assisted by the Chairman (Colombia) t Vice-Chairman (Canada) ) and the Rapporteur (Iran) of the Committee, At its first meeting, 11 December 1346, Sub-Committee 2 elected as its chairman the Chairman of the Committee. At its second meeting, 12 December 1946, the Sub-CommZttee appointed a Drafting CommVttee consisting of the members for France, the Union of Soviet SoclaUs% Republics, the United Kingdom, and the United States of’ America, to prepare a report in co-operation with yr. Howard K. MenhinIck (Secretariat) y The draft report was presented to the thfrd meeting of the Sub-Committee, 12 December l$& Mr, Entezam presented the Sub-Conrm-ittee t s report (A/SI’JIE/Sub .2/l) to the twenty-s,ixth ’ / meeting of the Committee, 12 December I.946. For the check list of the documents of the Sub-Committee, see Part B (3). ( j 5. The Interim Corr3nittee ‘Ihe Interim. Committee for the Selectio;n of a Site for the ,Perm~~~ent Headquarters of the United Nations was appo,inted by the Preparatory Commission I of the United Natfons wi.th the adoption at its fourth plenary meeting, / 23 December l.345, of the report of Comittee 8 (PC/CD/g). The TnterIrtx Corqrtittee was composed of representatives of Australia, China, Cuba, France, Iran, Iraq, the Netherlands, Poland, the Union of Sovjet SocialZst Republics, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Yugoslavia, At its first meeting, ’ 27 December 1945, the Interim Committee elected Mr. Roberto E. Ma&achen * ) (Uruguay) as Chairman and Mr, Stoyan Gavrilovic’ (Yugoslavia) as Vice +=Chairrr-an “i” ;\yr$1 i’P /The Interim : A/SIm/53 Page 3 8 The Interim Committee appointed an Inspection Group and a Juridical Sub-Committee. For the check list of documents of the Interim Committee and ,’ its sub-committees, see Part B '(4). , The, Inspection Group, to inspect and report on proposed sites in the United States of America, was appointed at the'first meeting of the Inter-L1 Committee, 27 December 1,945. It was composed of representatives of China, France, Iraq, the Union of*Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, and Yugoslavia. At its first meeting, 29 December 1945, the Inspection Group elected Mr. Stoyan Gavrilovic' (Yugoslavia) as Chairman an' Mr. Shuhsi Hsu (China) as Vice-Chairman, Mr. Gavrilovic' presented its rey (A/SITE/2, and Ad&l, Add.2, Add.3) to the fourth meeting of the Interim Committee, 5 February 1346, when he was appointed Rapporteur, and to the E meeting of the Permanent Headquarters Committee, 6 February 1346. The Juridical Sub-Committee was appointed by the Interim Committee at second meeting, 27 December 1945, and was composed of representatives of Australia, China, Cuba, Poland (designated Chairman), the United Kingdom, Yugoslavia, The Chairman was Mr. E. Sobolewski (Pbland). Mr. WilliamEric Beckett (United Kingdom) was elected Acting Chairman at tl 3 ninth meeting, 25 January 1346. He also acted as Rapporteur to the Sub-Committee on Privileges and Immunities of the Sixth Committee of the United Nations, to which the reports df. the Juridical Sub-Committee were referred by agreement with the Chairman of the Interim Committee. The rep consisted of suggested changes (PC/ICH/W.19) in the draft of the general convention on the privileges of the United Nations recommended by the Preparatory Commission (in PC/20, Chap, VII, Appendix B), and a revised ti convention (A/ICH/W.21/Rev,l) between the United Nations and the Governme of the United States of America based upon documents PC/G/24 and PC/G/31 the Preparatory Commission. 6. Other bodies reporting to the Permanent Headquarters Cormnittee The Headquarters Commission was established by Resolution No. 25 (I adopted by the General Assembly at its thirty-third plenary meeting, * /14 February 14 February 1946, upon the first report (A/@/Rev.L) of the Permanent Headquarters Committee o The Commission was composed of representatives of 1 / ,i Australia, China, France, Iraq, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the I, Unton of Soviet Socialist Republics, Uruguay, and. Yugoslavia. At fts f-frst meting, 7 &y 1946, the Commission elected Sir @US 3xnerKU.e Fletcher (United. Hingdom) as cha-lrman. Sir Angus presented the report of the Commission, (A/63) and a note (A/104) on the fiti i3luatratl~ th$ report to the i fourteenth meetfng of the Committee, 7 November 1946, See forthcoming document A/HQC/W.56 for the check list of Cornmi.~~ion d~~m@nt&., me Committee to assist the Secretary-General to negotiate ath the competent authorit-Les of the United. States of America the arrangements , required as a result of the establishment of the seat of the UnIted. Nations in the United States of America was established on the recoznmendation of the ’ ’ Sixth Committee, to which it reported, See document ~/c.6/132, Part B (7) for the check list of the documents of the negotiating committee, The Headquarters Advisory Committee was establlshed by Resolution No, 100 (I), adopted: by the General Assembly at its sixty-PIfth plenary meeting, 14 December 1946, upon the second report of the Permanent , Headquarters Committee (A/277) IL The Headquarters Advisory Committee is composed of representatives of Australia, Bel@um, Colombia, France, Greece, India, Norway, Poland, Syria, the Union of Soviet Socialist RepubLlcs, the ’ United Kingdom, the Untted States of America, and Yugoslavia. At its first j $meeting, 6 January 1947, the Comm-Lttae elected J4r. Warren Robinson A_ustln (United States of America) as Chair-, Mr, Herschel V Johnson l 7. (United States of America) has on occasion taken the chair in Mr. Austin1 s stead, Working papers of this committee (series A/AC,‘// ) are not ~%l.uded in this check list, - ------- vu w.uu.L-u/J” ,’ lasembly which adopted the following resolution thereon Sk-acondReport (A/277). Resolution No, 100 (I), adopted 14 Dece$xa 1946 (A/bk/Add.l, ) page s ~$5 -UT 1 II * I 0 0 # The check list of documents contains the following information: Left -hand column; Ser-Les symbol and document number In series. Middle CO&XUUX Short title of document; number of pages (English or bilingual text); date of registration of basic text with Documents Control Unit * In the case of summary records of meetings, issued as Supplements to f the Jourruzl of the General Assembly (abbreviated JGA) or to the Journal of ’ the United Nations (abbreviated 2)) the numbers of Supplements and Journals l are shown. Republication of documents in the Cff-LcTal Records of the First Past of the First Session of the General Assembly (abbreviated Official Records) is indIcatea, R&ht -hand column: Language of Issue I, Single-language texts are Ukkxted as En&Tab (abbreviated E), French (F) t Chinese (C), Russian (R), or Span-ltsh (X) * BilSngual texts are Indicated as EnglPsh and French together (E&J?) I J3ocument No, Issued . 3.32 So~ias Short Title In A/STIIIE/ (1) Documents of the Permanent ffeadquarters Comm1ttse (a) General Documents and Summazy Records 1 Summery Record, 1st Meeting, 2 February E&4? 1946 (Suppl, No, 8 to JGA No. 22), 1 p. (4 February 1946) - Republished “In Permanent Eeadquarters E&F Committee Ctfficlal Records, pp. 3-4* 2 Report and Recommendatfons of the Inspection ‘E F Group on Selecting the Permanent Site and Interim Facllitfes for the Headquarters of the United Nations, 23 pp * (4 February ~46 1 Z/Add,1 Annexe s A-F.
Recommended publications
  • World War II-Related Exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art
    National Gallery of Art: Research Resources Relating to World War II World War II-Related Exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art During the war years, the National Gallery of Art presented a series of exhibitions explicitly related to the war or presenting works of art for which the museum held custody during the hostilities. Descriptions of each of the exhibitions is available in the list of past exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art. Catalogs, brochures, press releases, news reports, and photographs also may be available for examination in the Gallery Archives for some of the exhibitions. The Great Fire of London, 1940 18 December 1941-28 January 1942 American Artists’ Record of War and Defense 7 February-8 March 1942 French Government Loan 2 March 1942-1945, periodically Soldiers of Production 17 March-15 April 1942 Three Triptychs by Contemporary Artists 8-15 April 1942 Paintings, Posters, Watercolors, and Prints, Showing the Activities of the American Red Cross 2-30 May 1942 Art Exhibition by Men of the Armed Forces 5 July-2 August 1942 War Posters 17 January-18 February 1943 Belgian Government Loan 7 February 1943-January 1946 War Art 20 June-1 August 1943 Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Drawings and Watercolors from French Museums and Private Collections 8 August-5 September 1943 (second showing) Art for Bonds 12 September-10 October 1943 1DWLRQDO*DOOHU\RI$UW:DVKLQJWRQ'&*DOOHU\$UFKLYHV ::,,5HODWHG([KLELWLRQVDW1*$ Marine Watercolors and Drawings 12 September-10 October 1943 Paintings of Naval Aviation by American Artists
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd INFANTRY REGIMENT
    2nd INFANTRY REGIMENT 1110 pages (approximate) Boxes 1243-1244 The 2nd Infantry Regiment was a component part of the 5th Infantry Division. This Division was activated in 1939 but did not enter combat until it landed on Utah Beach, Normandy, three days after D-Day. For the remainder of the war in Europe the Division participated in numerous operations and engagements of the Normandy, Northern France, Rhineland, Ardennes-Alsace and Central Europe campaigns. The records of the 2nd Infantry Regiment consist mostly of after action reports and journals which provide detailed accounts of the operations of the Regiment from July 1944 to May 1945. The records also contain correspondence on the early history of the Regiment prior to World War II and to its training activities in the United States prior to entering combat. Of particular importance is a file on the work of the Regiment while serving on occupation duty in Iceland in 1942. CONTAINER LIST Box No. Folder Title 1243 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Histories January 1943-June 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Histories, July-October 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment Histories, July 1944- December 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, July-September 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, October-December 1944 2nd Infantry Regiment After Action Reports, January-May 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Casualty List, 1944-1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Unit Journal, 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment Narrative History, October 1944-May 1945 2nd Infantry Regiment History Correspondence, 1934-1936 2nd Infantry
    [Show full text]
  • War Diary of CL 57 U.S.S. Montpelier, September, 1942-December, 1945 United States Navy
    Bangor Public Library Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl World War Regimental Histories World War Collections 1945 War diary of CL 57 U.S.S. Montpelier, September, 1942-December, 1945 United States Navy Follow this and additional works at: http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his Recommended Citation United States Navy, "War diary of CL 57 U.S.S. Montpelier, September, 1942-December, 1945" (1945). World War Regimental Histories. 175. http://digicom.bpl.lib.me.us/ww_reg_his/175 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the World War Collections at Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. It has been accepted for inclusion in World War Regimental Histories by an authorized administrator of Bangor Community: Digital Commons@bpl. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PUBLISHED DECEMBER, 1945 CAPT. W. A. GORRY, USN, Commanding COMDR. R. A. MITCHELL, USN, Exec. Officer Co. Editors LIEUT . .J. B. CRALLE, II, USNR ENs . .J. R. CHADWICK, USNH Photographs By I WoRTHINGTON, C. L., PhoM 2/c, USNR TRIPP, W. W., PboM 3/ c, USNR BERERS, M. L., PhoM 1/c, USNR STEVENSON, D. L., S l / c, USNR ENs . .J . R. CHADWICK, USNR Special Contributors: BEESON, S lie, USNR LIEUT. CoMDR. R. W. FooTI-IORAP, USNR LIEUT. G. w. HESSER, USNR ' FOREWORD This so-called War Diary is an honest attempt to record a brief chapter in the young life of a gallant ship. No effort has been made to glamourize her deeds; no claim has been made that she fought the war single-handed; no single incident or group has been intentionally empha­ sized or omitted.
    [Show full text]
  • EQUAL STATUS, 1946–1948 When, in November 1946, the Canadian
    CHAPTER FOUR EQUAL STATUS, 1946–1948 When, in November 1946, the Canadian prime minister, Mackenzie King, called for talks on the of\ ce of high commissioner, Britain launched a ‘diversionary attack’1 on what she perceived to be its incumbents’ ‘weakest ank’: she suggested that ‘all troubles will be over’ if they were given the title ‘excellency’.2 Apart from Ireland, who was already addressing high commissioners in this way, none of the dominions welcomed Britain’s move. Until recently, only their governors-general (together with the British high commissioner for Bechuanaland, Basu- toland, and Swaziland) had been so styled. The arrival of an Ameri- can ambassador in Ottawa at the end of 1943 had led to Canada’s speedy adoption of what had by then become the common practice of bestowing ‘excellency’ not only on ambassadors but also on lower- ranking ministers plenipotentiary (who headed legations).3 But she was reluctant to have any more excellencies in Ottawa. Also, like Australia, she thought Britain’s proposal did not address the fundamental problem of the status of high commissioners, and was unlikely to remove confu- sion about the nature of the of\ ce. New Zealand said it ‘would detract in the minds of the public in the Dominions from the signi cance’ of using this title for the governor-general.4 Nor did South Africa like the suggestion. The British high commissioner there ‘only rarely’ functioned in his gubernatorial capacity5 (and was therefore seldom called ‘excel- lency’); the Union had not followed the fashion of addressing heads 1 Lester Pearson (under-secretary, DEA)-Norman Robertson (Canadian HC, London), 28 November 1946, DCER 12, 1496.
    [Show full text]
  • University Archives Inventory
    University Archives Inventory Record Group Number: UR001.03 Title: Burney Lynch Parkinson Presidential Records Date: 1926-1969 Bulk Date: 1932-1952 Extent: 42 boxes Creator: Burney Lynch Parkinson Administrative/Biographical Notes: Burney Lynch Parkinson (1887-1972) was an educator from Lincoln, Tennessee. He received his B.S. from Erskine College in 1909, and rose up the administrative ranks from English teacher in Laurens, South Carolina public schools. He received his M.A. from Peabody College in 1920, and Ph.D. from Peabody in 1926, after which he became president of Presbyterian College in Clinton, SC in 1927. He was employed as Director of Teacher Training, Certification, and Elementary Education at the Alabama Dept. of Education just before coming to MSCW to become president in 1932. In December 1932, the university was re-accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, ending the crisis brought on the purge of faculty under Governor Theodore Bilbo, but appropriations to the university were cut by 54 percent, and faculty and staff were reduced by 33 percent, as enrollment had declined from 1410 in 1929 to 804 in 1932. Parkinson authorized a study of MSCW by Peabody college, ultimately pursuing its recommendations to focus on liberal arts at the cost of its traditional role in industrial, vocational, and technical education. Building projects were kept to a minimum during the Parkinson years. Old Main was restored and named for Mary Calloway in 1938. Franklin Hall was converted to a dorm, and the Whitfield Gymnasium into a student center with the Golden Goose Tearoom inside. Parkinson Hall was constructed in 1951 and named for Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 52 CONSTITUTION of the UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL
    No. 52 CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISATION Signed at London, on 16 November 1945 Came into force on 4 November 1946 by acceptance. English and French official texts communicated by the Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands. The registration took place on 12 June 1947. CONVENTION CREANT UNE ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L©EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE Sign e Londres, le 16 novembre 1945 Entr e en vigueur le 4 novembre 1946 par acceptation. Textes officiels anglais et français communiqués par le ministre des Affaires étrangères des Pays-Bas. L'enregistrement a eu lieu le 12 juin 1947. 276 United Nations — Treaty Series 1947 No. 52. CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED NATIONS EDU CATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANISA TION. SIGNED AT LONDON ON 16 NOVEMBER 1945 The Governments of the States parties to this Constitution on behalf of their peoples declare, that since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed; that ignorance of each other©s ways and lives has been a common cause, throughout the history of mankind, of that suspicion and mistrust between the peoples of the world through which their differences have all too often broken into war; that the great and terrible war which has now ended was a war made pos sible by the denial of the democratic principles of the dignity, equality and mutual respect of men, and by the propagation, in their place, through ignorance and prejudice, of the doctrine of the inequality
    [Show full text]
  • International Law Documents : 1948-49
    International Law Studies – Volume 46 International Law Documents U.S. Naval War College (Editor) The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the U.S. government, the U.S. Department of the Navy or the Naval War College. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Page 1. Charter of the Organization of American States, Bogota, 30 April 1948 .. .. .. ............. .. ..... .... ......... ..... 2. American Treaty of Pacific Settlement: "Pact of Bogota," Bogota, 30 April 1948. 26 3. Treaty of Economic, Social and Cultural Collaboration and Col- lective Self-Defense (United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Luxem- bourg, and the Netherlands), Brussels, 17 March 1948.... .. 46 4. North Atlantic Defense Treaty, Washington, 4 April1949...... .. 52 5. Revised General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, Lake Success, 28 April 1949... 56 6. Statute of the Council of Europe, London, 5 May 1949.. 57 II. TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS 1. International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Indictment No. 1, 29 April 1946 (excerpts). 71 2. International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Judgment, 4-12 November 1948 (excerpts). 76 3. Tabulation of the Tokyo Sentences of Individual Defendants. 107 III. RIGHTS CLAIMED BY LITTORAL STATES IN ADJACENT SEAS 1. The Corfu Channel Case (Merits), International Court of Justice, Judgment of 9 April 1949.. 108 2. United States Laws and Regulations.......................... 156 (a) Harbors Closed to Foreign Vessels..................... 156 (b) DefensiveSeaAreas ............................. .. .. 157 (c) Maritime Control Areas.............................. 169 (d) Customs Enforcement Areas........................ 176 (e) Laws concerning Pollution of Navigable Waters....... .. 180 3. Claims to the Continental Shelf. • 182 (a) United States of America: Presidential Proclamation, 28 September 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Wavell's Breakdown Plan, 1945-47: an Appraisal
    219 Iqbal Chawla: Wavell’s Plan Wavell’s Breakdown Plan, 1945-47: an Appraisal Iqbal Chawla University of the Punjab, Lahore ________________________________________________________________ The Breakdown Plan was prepared by Lord Wavell and his closest circle of advisors to deal with the fast evolving political situation in India. Two main political tendencies had crystallized in post-War India: Keeping India as one geographic entity; the second one was diametrically opposed to it, espoused by the Muslims, who wanted an independent Muslim-majority state. Wavell’s BP was formulated with two main goals in mind: Firstly, a safe withdrawal of the British from India; secondly, to avoid a partition of India by attempting to maintain it as one geographic entity. For the first goal Wavell suggested a ‘phased withdrawal’ from India, which would be initiated from the Hindu-majority provinces of the south. The second goal was to be achieved by proposing a partition of both the Punjab and Bengal, as a bargaining tool with the Muslim League to deter from pursuing its agenda of a separate Muslim-majority homeland on religious grounds. Although Wavell’s overall plan was rejected by the HMG in London, parts of it were, however, incorporated in the final withdrawal plan laid down by Mountbatten, Wavell’s successor, in his June 3 Plan. This included the partitioning of both the Bengal and the Punjab thus dealing a blow to Muslim interests in both those provinces. This article tries to detail the overall BP and its implications for the Muslims, particularly, as it ended up shaping the future course of the history of the Punjab.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ELEANOR ROOSEVELT PAPERS: VOLUME 1 1945–1948 Vii Erpfm 9/25/06 3:28 PM Page Viii
    ERPfm 9/25/06 3:28 PM Page vii Contents Acknowledgments ..... XXV Foreword ..... XXXI Introduction ..... XXXV Editorial Principles and Practices ..... XLV Chronology ..... LI Abbreviations ..... LIX 1945: April–December Introduction: “We have to start again under our own momentum and wonder what we can achieve.” ..... 1 Leaving the White House 1. Eleanor Roosevelt to Lorena Hickok 19 April 1945 ..... 13 On Starting Over 2. My Day 19 April 1945 ..... 15 On FDR and the Founding of the United Nations 3. My Day 25 April 1945 ..... 18 On Germans and the Holocaust 4. My Day 28 April 1945 ..... 21 On the Dangers of Racial Superiority 5. My Day 30 April 1945 ..... 23 6. If You Ask Me May 1945 ..... 25 On Churchill, Stalin, and the German Surrender 7. Harry Truman to Eleanor Roosevelt 10 May 1945 ..... 27 8. Eleanor Roosevelt to Harry Truman 14 May 1945 ..... 28 On the Bretton Woods Accords 9. My Day 21 May 1945 ..... 33 On ER’s Political Future 10. Harold Ickes to Eleanor Roosevelt 21 May 1945 ..... 35 11. Eleanor Roosevelt to Harold Ickes 26 May 1945 ..... 36 On the Importance of Unions 12. My Day 26 May 1945 ..... 39 THE ELEANOR ROOSEVELT PAPERS: VOLUME 1 1945–1948 vii ERPfm 9/25/06 3:28 PM Page viii CONTENTS On Stettinius and the San Francisco Conference 13. My Day 31 May 1945 ..... 41 14. My Day 1 June 1945 ..... 42 Eleanor Roosevelt and Democratic Party Politics 15. Eleanor Roosevelt to Harry Truman 3 June 1945 ..... 46 16. Eleanor Roosevelt to Robert Hannegan 3 June 1945 ..... 47 17.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL 10
    UNITED E NATIONS Economic and Social Council Distr. GENERAL 10 December 1946 CND Res.9(I). Procedure for future appointments to the Permanent Central Opium Board On 3 October 1946,*/ the Economic and Social Council adopted a resolution requesting the Commission on Narcotic Drugs to advise the Council as to the procedure to be followed in making future appointments to the Permanent Central Opium Board created under the Convention of 19 February 1925. The Commission examined carefully this question at its meetings of 6 and 9 December 1946. In the light of past experience, and guided by the provisions of article 19 of the Geneva Convention of 19 February 1925, the Commission has formulated the following recommendations: (1) The Commission recommends that the Economic and Social Council, at its first session following the entry into force of the amendments to the Convention of 19 February 1925 as set forth in the annex to the protocol amending the agreements, conventions and protocols on narcotic drugs signed on 11 December 1946, request the Secretary-General to invite the parties to this Convention each to submit to him the names of two persons satisfying the conditions of article 19 of this Convention. This article as amended by the above-mentioned protocol reads as follows: "The Central Board shall consist of eight persons who, by their technical competence, impartiality and disinterestedness will command general confidence. "The members of the Central Board shall be appointed by the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. "In making appointments, consideration shall be given to the importance of including on the Central Board, in equitable proportion, persons possessing a knowledge of the drug situation, both in the producing and manufacturing countries on the one hand, and in the consuming countries on the other hand, and connected with such countries.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • VI. 10. Constitution of Japan, 3 November 1946
    International Law Studies – Volume 46 International Law Documents U.S. Naval War College (Editor) The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the U.S. government, the U.S. Department of the Navy or the Naval War College. 257 Nations; and Italy promotes and favors international organiza­ tions directed to this end. ARTICLE 16. .. Every citizen is free to leave and re-enter the territory of the Republic, subject only to legal obligations. ARTICLE 26. The extradition of a citizen can be consented to only where it is expressly provided for by in tern a tional con­ ventions. It cannot be allowed in any case for political offenses. ARTICLE 35. The Republic ... promotes and favors inter­ national agreements and organizations intended to strengthen and regulate the rights of labor. It recognizes freedom of emigration, except where contrary to obligations estabilshed by law in the general interest, and pro­ tects Italian labor abroad. ARTICLE 75 . ... The referendum is not allowed for laws .. granting authoriaztion to ratify international treaties. ARTICLE 80. The Chambers [Chamber of Deputies and Sen­ ate] authorize by laws the ratification of international treaties which are of a political nature, or provide for arbitrations or judicial settlements, or bring about changes of territory or bur­ dens on the finances or modifications of laws. ARTICLE 87. The President of the Republic is the head of the State and represents the national unity .... He accredits and receives diplomatic representatives and rati­ fies international treaties, with previous authorization of the Chambers when necessary. 10. Constitution of Japan, 3 November 1946 (United States Department of State Publication 2836.) [Translation] We, the Japanese people, desire peace for all time and · are deeply conscious of the high ideals con trolling human relation­ ship, and we have determined to preserve our security and ex­ istence, trusting in the justice and faith of the peace-loving peoples of the world.
    [Show full text]