Research Report 189 March 2010
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Insects of Ojibway Prairie, a Southern Ontario Tallgras Prairie
199 Chapter 9 Insects of Ojibway Prairie, a Southern Ontario Tallgrass Prairie Steve M. Paiero and Stephen A. Marshall Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada Paul D. Pratt Windsor Department of Parks Windsor, Ontario, Canada Matthias Buck Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph Guelph, Ontario, Canada Abstract. This chapter describes the insect fauna of Ojibway Prairie, a tallgrass prairie complex in southern Ontario, highlighting the tallgrass-dependent and tallgrass-associated species among the over 2,000 insect species found there so far. The presence of tallgrass-dependent and tallgrass-associated species reflects Ojibway Prairie’s status as a fragment of a formerly more continuous grassland and thus supports the prairie peninsula hypothesis. The chapter includes a discussion of insect species associated with other southern Ontario tallgrass prairie sites and compares these species with those found in Ojibway Prairie. Also discussed are rare species found at Ojibway Prairie but not associated specifically with tallgrass habitats. Forty-four insect species new to Canada or new to Ontario (1 Orthoptera, 3 Hemiptera, 10 Coleoptera, 16 Diptera, and 14 Hymenoptera) are recorded from Ojibway Prairie. Résumé. Ce chapitre décrit l’entomofaune de la prairie Ojibway, un complexe de prairies à herbes hautes du sud de l’Ontario, en portant une attention particulière aux espèces dépendantes des herbes hautes ou associées à ces dernières et qui sont au nombre des quelque 2 000 espèces d’insectes recensées jusqu’ici à cet endroit. La présence d’insectes dépendants des herbes hautes ou associés à ces dernières est un reflet de l’état actuel de la prairie Ojibway, qui n’est plus qu’un fragment d’une prairie autrefois plus continue, et vient appuyer l’hypothèse de la « péninsule de prairie ». -
The Leafhopper Vectors of Phytopathogenic Viruses (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) Taxonomy, Biology, and Virus Transmission
/«' THE LEAFHOPPER VECTORS OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC VIRUSES (HOMOPTERA, CICADELLIDAE) TAXONOMY, BIOLOGY, AND VIRUS TRANSMISSION Technical Bulletin No. 1382 Agricultural Research Service UMTED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many individuals gave valuable assistance in the preparation of this work, for which I am deeply grateful. I am especially indebted to Miss Julianne Rolfe for dissecting and preparing numerous specimens for study and for recording data from the literature on the subject matter. Sincere appreciation is expressed to James P. Kramer, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., for providing the bulk of material for study, for allowing access to type speci- mens, and for many helpful suggestions. I am also grateful to William J. Knight, British Museum (Natural History), London, for loan of valuable specimens, for comparing type material, and for giving much useful information regarding the taxonomy of many important species. I am also grateful to the following persons who allowed me to examine and study type specimens: René Beique, Laval Univer- sity, Ste. Foy, Quebec; George W. Byers, University of Kansas, Lawrence; Dwight M. DeLong and Paul H. Freytag, Ohio State University, Columbus; Jean L. LaiFoon, Iowa State University, Ames; and S. L. Tuxen, Universitetets Zoologiske Museum, Co- penhagen, Denmark. To the following individuals who provided additional valuable material for study, I give my sincere thanks: E. W. Anthon, Tree Fruit Experiment Station, Wenatchee, Wash.; L. M. Black, Uni- versity of Illinois, Urbana; W. E. China, British Museum (Natu- ral History), London; L. N. Chiykowski, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa ; G. H. L. Dicker, East Mailing Research Sta- tion, Kent, England; J. -
100 Characters
40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. -
2002 12 the Cerrados of Brazil.Pdf
00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page i The Cerrados of Brazil 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page ii 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iii The Cerrados of Brazil Ecology and Natural History of a Neotropical Savanna Editors Paulo S. Oliveira Robert J. Marquis Columbia University Press New York 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page iv Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex © 2002 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The cerrados of Brazil : ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna / Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-231-12042-7 (cloth : alk. paper)—ISBN 0-231-12043-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Cerrado ecology—Brazil. I. Oliveira, Paulo S., 1957– II. Marquis, Robert J., 1953– QH117 .C52 2002 577.4'8'0981—dc21 2002022739 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 00 oliveira fm 7/31/02 8:11 AM Page v Contents Preface vii 1 Introduction: Development of Research in the Cerrados 1 Paulo S. Oliveira and Robert J. Marquis I Historical Framework and the Abiotic Environment 2 Relation of Soils and Geomorphic Surfaces in the Brazilian Cerrado 13 Paulo E. F. Motta, Nilton Curi, and Donald P. -
Hemiptera, Cicadellidae
Acta Biol. Par., Curitiba, 35 (3-4): 89-161. 2006. 89 Catalogue of the neotropical (including north of Mexico) Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera, Cicadellidae). Part I — Athysanini and Deltocephalini excluded 1 Catálogo dos Deltocephalinae (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) neotropicais (incluíndo o norte do México). Parte I — Athysanini e Deltocephalini excluídos KETI M. R. ZANOL TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 90 Acronyms of the institutions mentioned 91 ACINOPTERINI Oman, 1943 91 CERRILLINI Linnavuori, 1975 93 CICADULINI Van Duzee, 1892 94 DORATURINI Ribaut, 1952 94 HECALINI Distant, 1908 97 LUHERIINI Linnavuori, 1959 101 MACROSTELINI Kirkaldy, 1906 101 OPSIINI Emeljanov, 1962 110 PENTHIMIINI Kirschbaum, 1868 111 PLATYMETOPIINI Haupt, 1929 112 SCAPHOIDEINI Oman, 1943 113 SCAPHYTOPIINI Oman, 1943 119 STENOMETOPIINI Baker, 1923 131 Genera Incertae Sedis 133 Resumo 134 Summary 134 Résumé 135 Bibliogography 135 Index 150 1 Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brazil. E-mail, [email protected]. Fellowship of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico -CNPq. 90 Acta Biol. Par., Curitiba, 35 (3-4): 89-161. 2006. In the General Catalogue of the Homoptera (METCALF, 1967) contains 36 genera and 215 Neotropical species, including north of Mexico distributed within 10 tribes (two genera and six species in Euscelini, one genera and one species in Colladonini, one genus and one species in Goniagnathini, four genera and 52 species in Acinopterini, one genus and one species in Cicadulini, four genera and 80 species in Scaphytopiini, five genera and 32 species in Balcluthini, one genus and one species in Macrostelini, three genera and five species in Platymetopiini and 14 genera and 82 species in Scaphoideini). -
Out Hern Lepidopterists' NEWS
out hern Lepidopterists' NEWS EST. 1978 Official Newsletter of the Southern Lepidopterists' Society Vol. 32 NO. 3 September 30, 2010 THE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS1 SOCIETY ORGANIZED TO PROMOTE SCIENTIFIC INTEREST AND KNOWLEDGE RELATED TO UNDERSTANDING THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA OF THE SOUTHERN REGION OF THE UNITED STATES (WEBSITE: www.southernlepsoc.org/) J. BARRY LOMBARDINI: EDITOR Citation: Brou Jr., Vernon A. 2010. Baron Ludwig von Reizenstein (1826-1885) Father of Louisiana Lepidopterists. South. Lepid. News 32: 120-126. SOUTHERN LEPIDOPTERISTS' NEWS VOLUME 32 NO. 3 (2010), PG.120 BARON LUDWIG VON REIZENSTEIN (1826 -1885) FATHER OF LOUISIANA LEPIDOPTERISTS BY VERNON ANTOINE BROU JR. The earliest known publication listing species of lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) occurring within the state of Louisiana is a civil war era document, dated 1863 by Ludwig von Reizenstein that myself and other researchers \ ' have cited numerous times since its publication. This typewriter recreated copy in my possession appears to have been obtained by Edward N. Lambremont who authored or coauthored several investigative articles (1954,1963,1965) in the mid-twentieth century concerning butterflies of Louisiana since von Reizenstein first, comprehensively listed all the known butterflies of the state. I obtained my copy of this document from the library of the entomology department at Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, specifically the Louisiana State Arthropod Museum (LSAM). The front page of the document states the (original) was prepared by L. von Reizenstein, printed for R.C. Kerr, librarian for the New Orleans Academy of Sciences, printed by Isaac T. Hinton, Commercial Place (New Orleans) in 1863. Examining von Reizenstein's publication reveals there are species listed consecutively 1-194, with the scientific name of each identified and collected butterfly and moth species along with the describing author's name for each. -
Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae)
311 Chapter 11 Canadian Grasslands and Their Endemic Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Cicadellidae) K.G.A. Hamilton Canadian National Collection of Insects K.W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Ave. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Abstract. The greatest numbers of leafhopper species endemic to Canada are those of grasslands, 33 of which are known. A far larger number, 263 species, are more broadly endemic to Nearctic grasslands. All 296 demonstrate strong regional differences not widely recognized in ecoregional classifi cations. Most endemics come from the open prairies (174 species). Second most numerous are the various faunas on comparatively tiny intermontane grasslands of southern British Columbia with 126 endemics, including the newly recorded Dikrella nevadensis (Lawson), here reinstated from synonymy. Of these endemics, 96 are found in the Okanagan-Similkameen valley system, 43 belong to the East Kootenays, and another 43 are found near Victoria and Vancouver, with numerous overlaps. One is known only from North Beach on the Haida Gwaii (Queen Charlotte) Islands and this is related to an endemic on Vancouver Island and the adjacent mainland. The fauna of the isolated, more northerly fescue grasslands have 80 endemics (39 in the Peace River district, 25 in the Thompson valley system and 43 in the lower Fraser River valley and its lesser tributaries), and these are similar to the fauna of aspen parkland. An additional 58 endemics are characteristic of the Prairie Peninsula, of which 21 are found on the tallgrass prairie of southernmost Ontario, as contrasted to 23 from alkaline fens, 21 from beaches, 16 from alvars, and 4 from sand plains, many of which are shared with oak savanna. -
Explorations in Central Asia and Mediterranean Basin to Select Biological Control Agents for Salsola Tragus
Explorations in Central Asia and Mediterranean basin to select biological control agents for Salsola tragus F. Lecce,1 A. Paolini,1 C. Tronci,1 L. Gültekin,2 F. Di Cristina,1 B.A. Korotyaev,3 E. Colonnelli,4 M. Cristofaro5 and L. Smith6 Summary Russian thistle, Salsola tragus L., (Chenopodiaceae), a troublesome weed complex in the drier regions of western North America, is native to Central Asia and widely distributed throughout the Palaearctic Region. Since 2003, several exploration and survey trips to discover new potential biological control agents for the weed were carried out in Italy, Russia, Turkey, Tunisia, Kazakhstan, Greece, Egypt and Morocco. Twenty-five arthropod species (one gall midge, one heteropteran, two flea beetles, three moths and 18 weevils) and two fungi were preliminarily selected during the surveys. Among them, four arthropod species (two weevils and two moths) were selected for further biology and host-specificity studies. At the moment, the most promising among these is the stem-boring weevil Anthypurinus biimpressus Brisout. Preliminary host range no-choice tests and life cycle observations showed that this species is restricted for feeding, oviposition and development to Russian thistle. Keywords: Salsola, Russian thistle, foreign exploration, tumbleweed, natural enemies. Introduction biochemical and molecular analyses are beginning to clarify the taxonomy. Similar species that are also inva- Russian thistle or tumbleweed, Salsola tragus L., sive in North America include Salsola paulsenii Litv., (Chenopodiaceae) is an invasive alien weed originating Salsola collina Pallas, Salsola ‘type B’ and various hy- from Central Asia and is the target of classical biologi- brids (Ryan and Ayres, 2000; Akers et al., 2003; Gaskin cal control in the United States (Goeden and Pember- et al., unpublished data). -
Implementation Guide to the DRAFT
2015 Implementation Guide to the DRAFT As Prescribed by The Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program and the State Wildlife Grant Program Illinois Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Implementation Guide Table of Contents I. Acknowledgments IG 1 II. Foreword IG 2 III. Introduction IG 3 IV. Species in Greatest Conservation Need SGCN 8 a. Table 1. SummaryDRAFT of Illinois’ SGCN by taxonomic group SGCN 10 V. Conservation Opportunity Areas a. Description COA 11 b. What are Conservation Opportunity Areas COA 11 c. Status as of 2015 COA 12 d. Ways to accomplish work COA 13 e. Table 2. Summary of the 2015 status of individual COAs COA 16 f. Table 3. Importance of conditions for planning and implementation COA 17 g. Table 4. Satisfaction of conditions for planning and implementation COA 18 h. Figure 1. COAs currently recognized through Illinois Wildlife Action Plan COA 19 i. Figure 2. Factors that contribute or reduce success of management COA 20 j. Figure 3. Intersection of COAs with Campaign focus areas COA 21 k. References COA 22 VI. Campaign Sections Campaign 23 a. Farmland and Prairie i. Description F&P 23 ii. Goals and Current Status as of 2015 F&P 23 iii. Stresses and Threats to Wildlife and Habitat F&P 27 iv. Focal Species F&P 30 v. Actions F&P 32 vi. Focus Areas F&P 38 vii. Management Resources F&P 40 viii. Performance Measures F&P 42 ix. References F&P 43 x. Table 5. Breeding Bird Survey Data F&P 45 xi. Figure 4. Amendment to Mason Co. Sands COA F&P 46 xii. -
Order Family Subfamily Genus Species Subspecies Author Year Series Region Units Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Acentria Ephe
Order Family Subfamily Genus species subspecies author year series region units Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Acentria ephemerella (Denis & Schiffermüller) 1C, 1D Nearctic, Palearctic trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Anydraula glycerialis (Walker) 1D Australasian trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis berthalis (Schaus) 1C Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis dodalis Schaus 1B Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis elphegalis (Schaus) 1B Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis flavalis (Warren) 1B Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis iasusalis (Walker) 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis paulalis (Schaus) 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis sp. 1C, 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis tetropalis Hampson 1D African trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractis triopalis Hampson 1D African trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractoides catenalis (Guenée 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractoides chalcistis (Dognin) 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Argyractoides gontranalis (Schaus) 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Aulacodes acroperalis Hampson 1D Australasian trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Aulacodes adiantealis (Walker) 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera Crambidae Acentropinae Aulacodes aechmialis Guenée 1D Neotropical trays Lepidoptera -
2015 Illinois Wildlife Action Plan Implementation Guide
2015 Implementation Guide to the As Prescribed by The Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program and the State Wildlife Grant Program Illinois Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Implementation Guide Table of Contents I. Acknowledgments IG vi II. Foreword IG vii III. Introduction IG 1 IV. Species in Greatest Conservation Need SGCN 6 a. Table 1. Summary of Illinois’ SGCN by taxonomic group SGCN 8 V. Conservation Opportunity Areas a. Description COA 9 b. What are Conservation Opportunity Areas COA 9 c. Status as of 2015 COA 10 d. Ways to accomplish work COA 11 e. Table 2. Summary of the 2015 status of individual COAs COA 14 f. Table 3. Importance of conditions for planning and implementation COA 15 g. Table 4. Satisfaction of conditions for planning and implementation COA 16 h. Figure 1. COAs currently recognized through Illinois Wildlife Action Plan COA 17 i. Figure 2. Factors that contribute or reduce success of management COA 18 j. Figure 3. Intersection of COAs with Campaign focus areas COA 19 k. References COA 20 VI. Campaigns Campaign 21 a. Farmland and Prairie i. Description F&P 22 ii. Goals and Current Status as of 2015 F&P 22 iii. Stresses and Threats to Wildlife and Habitat F&P 26 iv. Focal Species F&P 30 v. Actions F&P 31 vi. Focus Areas F&P 37 vii. Management Resources F&P 39 viii. Performance Measures F&P 41 ix. References F&P 42 x. Table 5. Breeding Bird Survey Data F&P 44 xi. Figure 4. Amendment to Mason Co. Sands COA F&P 45 xii. -
Importance of in Situ Survival, Recolonization, and Habitat Gaps in the Postfire Recovery of Fire-Sensitive Prairie Insect Species
Importance of In Situ Survival, Recolonization, and Habitat Gaps in the Postfire Recovery of Fire-Sensitive Prairie Insect Species RESEARCH ARTICLE ABSTRACT: I investigated the roles of in situ survival and recolonization in the postfire recovery of fire sensitive insect species within isolated tallgrass prairie remnants in lllinois, northwest Indiana, and southeast Wisconsin, USA. I examined the extent to which commonly encountered habitat gaps suppress recovery among several taxa and tested the pivotal assumption that small populations are readily extirpated when their requisite habitats are completely burned. Both in situ survival and recolonization were found to contribute appreciably to postfire recovery within the spatial and temporal • scales exaruined. Combined recovery times for 22 species separated from unburned units by roads or other barriers were not greater than those for populations in bum units abutting unburned tracts. The flightless leafhopper Aflexia rubranura (DeLong) and the sedentary moth Papaipema eryngii Bird Importance of In readily crossed habitat gaps as large as 36 m and 25 m, respectively. When 6-m gaps were covered with tar paper in the Aflexia experiment, colonization of outlying patches was reduced, but not stopped. I Situ Survival, conclude that bum unit designs that provide adjacent or nearby refugia, coupled with procedures that promote patchiness within burned units, can be expected to contribute appreciably to the rapid recovery Recolonization, and of fire-sensitive species. Importancia de la Supervivencia In Situ, la Recolonizaci6n, y los Gaps en el Habitat Gaps in the Habitat en la Recuperaci6n Posterior al Fuego de Especies de Insectos de L1anura Sensibles al Fuego Postfi re Recovery of RESUMEN: Investigue los roles de la supervivencia in situ y la recolonizaci6n en la recuperaci6n post quema de especies de insectos sensibles al fuego dentro de remanentes aislados de pastos altos en Fire-Sensitive Prairie Illinois, noroeste de Indiana, y sudeste de Wisconsin, USA.