DOCSLIB.ORG

1.4.2 Rewritten Bible

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1.4.2 Rewritten Bible A Priest for All Generations An Investigation into the Use of the Melchizedek Figure from Genesis to the Cave of Treasures Dalgaard, Kasper Publication date: 2013 Document version Også kaldet Forlagets PDF Document license: CC BY-NC-ND Citation for published version (APA): Dalgaard, K. (2013). A Priest for All Generations: An Investigation into the Use of the Melchizedek Figure from Genesis to the Cave of Treasures. Det Teologiske Fakultet. Publikationer fra Det Teologiske Fakultet Bind 48 Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 KA ISBN 978-87-91838-64-4 S PER DALGAAR PER KASPER DALGAARD A Priest for All Generations. An Investigation into the Use Of the D Melchizedek Figure From Genesis to the Cave of Treasures A A n Investigation into the Use Of the Melchizedek Figure From From Of the Use Figure into the Melchizedek n Investigation P riest for riest for KASPER DALGAARD A ll G enerations A Priest for All Generations An Investigation into the Use Of the Melchizedek Figure From Genesis to the Cave of Treasures G enesis to the Cave of the Cave enesis to Treasures. Publikationer fra Det Teologiske Fakultet 48 KA ISBN 978-87-91838-64-4 S PER DALGAAR PER KASPER DALGAARD A Priest for All Generations. An Investigation into the Use Of the D Melchizedek Figure From Genesis to the Cave of Treasures A A n Investigation into the Use Of the Melchizedek Figure From From Of the Use Figure into the Melchizedek n Investigation P riest for riest for KASPER DALGAARD A ll G enerations A Priest for All Generations An Investigation into the Use Of the Melchizedek Figure From Genesis to the Cave of Treasures G enesis to the Cave of the Cave enesis to Treasures. Publikationer fra Det Teologiske Fakultet 48 A Priest for All Generations A Priest for All Generations An Investigation into the Use of the Melchizedek Figure from Genesis to the Cave of Treasures Kasper Dalgaard DEPARTMENT OF BIBLICAL STUDIES , FACULTY OF THEOLOGY , UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN A Priest for All Generations: An Investigation into the Use of the Melchizedek Figure from Genesis to the Cave of Treasures Publikationer fra Det Teologiske Fakultet 48 Licensed under CreativeCommons Kasper Dalgaard ISBN: 978-87-91838-64-4 (print) ISBN: 978-87-93361-42-3 (pdf) Udgivet af: Det Teologiske Fakultet Københavns Universitet Købmagergade 44–46 1150 København K Trykning og indbinding: Grafisk - Københavns Universitet Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Jesper Tang Nielsen, for his invaluable suggestions, guidance, and readiness to read each new draft. Sincere thanks are also due to all my colleagues, past and present, at the Biblical Studies Section of the University of Copenhagen, for their pleasant company and their patience with my constant references to Melchizedek. I would also thank my family and, above all, my wife Jeanne, for her endless love and support, without which this dissertation would never have reached its present stage. Finally, I dedicate this study to my father Jørn, who passed away as the final chapters were being written. He taught me that the best kind of knowledge to have is that which is learned for its own sake, and for this reason, this dissertation is dedicated to him. Table of Contents Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. xi Chapter 1. Introduction..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Aim and Scope of the Study .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Sources............................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Earlier Research: Some Remarks....................................................................... 3 1.4 Notes on Sects and Rewritten Bible................................................................... 8 1.4.1 The Anstalt and the Sectarians.................................................................... 8 1.4.2 Rewritten Bible......................................................................................... 11 Chapter 2. Melchizedek in Hebrew Scripture ................................................................ 15 2.1 Genesis............................................................................................................. 15 2.1.1 Introduction to Genesis 14:18–20 ............................................................ 15 2.1.2 Melchizedek in Genesis 14:18–20............................................................ 17 2.1.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in Genesis 14:18–20................................... 25 2.2 Psalm 110......................................................................................................... 25 2.2.1 Introduction to Psalm 110 ........................................................................ 25 2.2.2 Melchizedek in Psalm 110........................................................................ 28 2.2.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in Psalm 110............................................... 30 Chapter 3. Turn-of-the-Era Interpretations of Melchichedek......................................... 32 3.1 Greek Fragment on the Life of Abraham ........................................................ 32 3.1.1 Introduction to the Greek Fragment on the Life of Abraham ................... 32 3.1.2 Melchizedek in the Greek Fragment on the Life of Abraham .................. 37 3.1.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in the Fragment on the Life of Abraham .... 39 3.2 Book of Jubilees .............................................................................................. 40 3.2.1 Introduction to Jubilees ............................................................................ 40 3.2.2 Melchizedek in Jubilees ........................................................................... 41 3.2.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in Jubilees .................................................. 43 3.3 The Genesis Apocryphon ................................................................................. 44 3.3.1 Introduction to the Genesis Apocryphon .................................................. 44 3.3.2 Melchizedek in the Genesis Apocryphon ................................................. 45 3.3.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in the Genesis Apocryphon ........................ 46 3.4 Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice ......................................................................... 47 3.4.1 Introduction to Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice ........................................ 47 3.4.2 Melchizedek in Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice ........................................ 52 3.4.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice ............... 56 3.5 4Q ‛Amram ....................................................................................................... 57 3.5.1 Introduction to 4Q ‛Amram....................................................................... 57 3.5.2 Melchizedek in 4Q ‛Amram...................................................................... 58 3.5.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in 4Q ‛Amram ............................................. 59 3.6 4Q246............................................................................................................... 60 3.6.1 Introduction to 4Q246 .............................................................................. 60 3.6.2 Melchizedek in 4Q246.............................................................................. 60 3.6.2 Conclusions to Melchizedek in 4Q246..................................................... 61 3.7 11Q13............................................................................................................... 62 3.7.1 Introduction to 11Q13 .............................................................................. 62 3.7.2 Melchizedek in 11Q13.............................................................................. 63 3.7.3 Conclusions to Melchizedek in 11Q13..................................................... 68 3.8 Melchizedek at Qumran................................................................................... 69 3.9 Philo of Alexandria.......................................................................................... 79 3.9.1 Introduction to Philo................................................................................. 79 3.9.2 Quaestiones in Genesin ............................................................................ 81 3.9.2.1 Introduction to Quaestiones in Genesin ............................................ 81 3.9.2.2 Melchizedek in Quaestiones in Genesin ........................................... 82 3.9.3 De Abrahamo ............................................................................................ 83 3.9.3.1 Introduction to De Abrahamo ........................................................... 83 3.9.3.2 Melchizedek in De Abrahamo ........................................................... 84 3.9.4 De Congressu Eruditionis Gratia ............................................................. 85 3.9.4.1 Introduction to De Congressu Eruditionis Gratia ............................. 85 3.9.4.2 Melchizedek in De Congressu Eruditionis Gratia ............................ 86 3.9.5 Legum Allegoriae ..................................................................................... 88 3.9.5.1 Introduction to Legum Allegoriae ..................................................... 88 3.9.5.2 Melchizedek in Legum Allegoriae ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain
    Department of History and Civilization As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain Ana Avalos Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, February 2007 EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE Department of History and Civilization As Above, So Below. Astrology and the Inquisition in Seventeenth-Century New Spain Ana Avalos Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board: Prof. Peter Becker, Johannes-Kepler-Universität Linz Institut für Neuere Geschichte und Zeitgeschichte (Supervisor) Prof. Víctor Navarro Brotons, Istituto de Historia de la Ciencia y Documentación “López Piñero” (External Supervisor) Prof. Antonella Romano, European University Institute Prof. Perla Chinchilla Pawling, Universidad Iberoamericana © 2007, Ana Avalos No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author A Bernardo y Lupita. ‘That which is above is like that which is below and that which is below is like that which is above, to achieve the wonders of the one thing…’ Hermes Trismegistus Contents Acknowledgements 4 Abbreviations 5 Introduction 6 1. The place of astrology in the history of the Scientific Revolution 7 2. The place of astrology in the history of the Inquisition 13 3. Astrology and the Inquisition in seventeenth-century New Spain 17 Chapter 1. Early Modern Astrology: a Question of Discipline? 24 1.1. The astrological tradition 27 1.2. Astrological practice 32 1.3. Astrology and medicine in the New World 41 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeitschrift Für Keilschriftforschung Und Verwandte Gebiete
    ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR KEILSCHRIFTFORSCHUNG UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE UNTER MITWIRKUNG DER HERREN A-. Amiaud und E. Babelon in Paris, G. Lyon in Cambridge - Mass. und Theo. G. Pinches in London HERAUSGEGEBEN VON CARL BEZOLD UND FRITZ HOMMEL PRIVATDOZENTEN AN DER UNIVERSITÄT MÜNCHEN. ERSTER BAND. LEIPZIG OTTO SCHULZE II QUER-STRASSE II 1884. INHALT. Seite Eb. Schräder, Zur Frage nach der Aussprache der Zischlaute im Baby¬ lonisch-Assyrischen . j A. H. Sayce, Ihe origin of the Persian cuneiform alphabet ... 19 St. Guyard, Quelques remarques sur la prononciation et la transcription de la chuintante et de la sifflante en Assyrien. 27 Fr. Hommel, Zur altbabylonischen Chronologie. 32 J. Oppert, Un acte de vente conservé en deux exemplaires .... 45 J. N. Strassmaier, S. J., Fünf babylonische Verträge aus der Zeit von Nebukadnezzar. o_ St. Guyard, Questions sumero-accadiennes. Rud. Dvorak, Ueber „tinüru“ des Assyrisch-Babylonischen und die entsprechenden Formen der übrigen semitischen Sprachen A. Amiaud, Quelques observations sur les inscriptions des statues de Tell - Loh . Fr. Hommel, Die sumero-akkadische Sprache und ihre Verwandschafts¬ verhältnisse . 16119 Fb. Schrader, Nachtrag zu seinem Aufsatz „Ueber die Aussprache der Zischlaute im Babylonisch-Assyrischen“ A. H. Sayce, The literary works of Ancient Babylonia. Eb. Schrader, Kineladan und Asurbanipal . A. Amiaud, L’inscription A de Gudea. P. Jensen, De incantamentorum sumerico-assyriorum seriei quae dicitur „surbu“ tabula VI. Theo. G. Pinches, Additions and Corrections to the Fifth Volume of the Cuneiform Inscriptions of Western Asia .... SPRECHSAAL: Fr. Hommel, An die Leser und Fachgenossen statt eines Vorworts . 65 J. N. Strassmaier, Aus einem Briefe desselben an Dr. C. Bezold 70 Fr.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew George, What's New in the Gilgamesh Epic?
    What’s new in the Gilgamesh Epic? ANDREW GEORGE School of Oriental and African Studies University of London Summary. The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic exists in several different versions. There were at least two versions current during the Old Babylonian period, and no doubt a similar situation obtained later in the second millennium BC, when versions of the epic were copied out in Anatolia, Syria and Palestine, as well as in Mesopotamia proper. But the best-known version is the one called “He who saw the Deep”, which was current in the first-millennium libraries of Assyria and Babylonia. Because this text was so much copied out in antiquity we keep finding more of it, both in museums and in archaeological excavation. This means that editions and translations of the epic must regularly be brought up to date. Some of the more important new passages that are previously unpublished are presented here in translation. WHAT THERE IS It was a great pleasure to be able to share with the Society at the symposium of 20 September 1997 some of the results of my work on the epic of Gilgamesh. My paper of this title was given without a script and was essentially a commentary on the slides that accompanied it. The written paper offered here on the same subject tells the story from the standpoint of one year later. Being the written counterpart of an oral presentation, I hope it may be recognized at least as a distant cousin of the talk given in Toronto. I should say at the outset that my work has been concerned primarily with the textual material in the Akkadian language, that is to say, with the Babylonian poems.
    [Show full text]
  • Pigs and Plaques: Considering Rm
    IRAQ (2018) Page 1 of 15 Doi:10.1017/irq.2018.10 1 PIGS AND PLAQUES: CONSIDERING RM. 714 IN LIGHT OF COMPARATIVE ARTISTIC AND TEXTUAL SOURCES1 By GINA KONSTANTOPOULOS Rm. 714, a first millennium B.C.E. tablet in the collections of the British Museum, is remarkable for the fine carving of a striding pig in high relief on its obverse. Purchased by Hormuzd Rassam in Baghdad in 1877, it lacks archaeological context and must be considered in light of other textual and artistic references to pigs, the closest parallel being a sow and her piglets seen in the reliefs of Court VI from Sennacherib’s palace at Nineveh. Unlike depictions of pigs on later cylinder seals, where they are often shown as a dangerous quarry in hunting scenes, Rm. 714’s pig appears in a more neutral, non-aggressive posture, similar to the sow in the Assyrian reliefs. Although Rm. 714’s highly curved reverse would inhibit its use as a mounted or otherwise easily displayed object, the tablet may still have served as an apotropaic object or sculptor’s model, among other potential functions. Rm. 714: Introduction This article centers on the analysis of a single tablet, Rm. 714, and the fine carving of a pig found on its obverse. Mesopotamian tablets could serve as the medium for more than cuneiform, and drawings are found on tablets as early as the third millennium B.C.E. Many of these early tablets are otherwise uninscribed, but later examples feature both drawing and cuneiform writing on a single tablet.2 Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Eve - Angel of Humanity
    http://biblehub.com/hebrew/2332.htm Eve - Angel of Humanity. http://hafapea.com/angelpages/angels2.html Eve 1 Eve For other uses, see Eve (disambiguation). Eve Eve Tempted by John Roddam Spencer Stanhope, c. 1877 Spouse(s) Adam Children • Cain • Abel • Seth Further information: Adam and Eve :Tigrinya ,ܚܘܐ :Syriac ,ﺣﻮﺍء :Classical Hebrew: Ḥawwāh, Modern Israeli Hebrew: Khavah, Arabic ,חַוָּה :Eve (Hebrew ሕይዋን? or Hiywan) is a figure in the Book of Genesis in the Hebrew Bible. In Islamic tradition, Eve is known as Adam's wife though she is not specifically named in the Qur'an. According to the creation myth of Abrahamic religions, she is the first woman created by God (Yahweh, the god of Israel). Her husband was Adam, from whose rib God created her to be his companion. She succumbs to the serpent's temptation via the suggestion that to eat the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil would improve on the way God had made her, and that she would not die, and she, believing the lie of the serpent rather than the earlier instruction from God, shares the fruit with Adam. As a result, the first humans are expelled from the Garden of Eden and are cursed. Though Eve is not a saint's name, the traditional name day of Adam and Eve has been celebrated on December 24 since the Middle Ages in many European countries such as Germany, Hungary, Scandinavia, Estonia, and Lithuania. Eve 2 Etymology Eve in Hebrew is Ḥawwāh, meaning "living one" or "source of life", and is related to ḥāyâ, "to live".
    [Show full text]
  • Editing Gilgamesh, Then and Now * AR George
    Shattered tablets and tangled threads: Editing Gilgamesh, then and now * A. R. George (London) Until about one hundred and fifty years ago all that modern people knew about the Babylonian hero-king, Gilgamesh, was the story in Aelian’s De natura animalium xii. This Roman author, writing in Greek in the second century AD, illustrated his contention that animals often showed kindness to humans with a story of how an eagle swooped down to save the infant Gilgamos as he plummeted to a certain death. The baby, fathered by a phantom and born in secret to a princess, had been cast from a high tower on the orders of the king. The eagle bore him off to a gardener, who brought him up. In due course he became king of the Babylonians in place of his grandfather. As it turns out, almost nothing of this story bears any relation to the traditions handed down about Gilgamesh in the ancient corpus of Babylonian literature that is now in the process of recovery. I stress ‘in the process’ because the work has really only just begun, with most scholars working in the field as pioneers, reading cuneiform texts and researching topics that have not been treated before. The Epic of Gilgamesh, however, has been the subject of much more scholarly attention than average, certainly because it is generally recognized as a great poetic masterpiece with an established place as the first long epic narrative in the history of world literature. History of modern editing The first to make sense of the clay tablets on which the poem was written was George Smith, who was employed by the British Museum in the late 1860s to sort through the fifteen thousand or so broken fragments of Assyrian cuneiform tablets and other inscriptions sent back to the museum from Kuyunjik, the citadel mound of Nineveh, in the early 1850s, chiefly by Austen Henry Layard but also by his assistant Hormuzd Rassam and by W.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient-Knowledge-Networks.Pdf
    Ancient Knowledge Networks Ancient Knowledge Networks A Social Geography of Cuneiform Scholarship in First-Millennium Assyria and Babylonia Eleanor Robson First published in 2019 by UCL Press University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Available to download free: www.uclpress.co.uk Text © Eleanor Robson, 2019 Images © Eleanor Robson and copyright holders named in captions, 2019 The author has asserted her rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as the author of this work. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Non- derivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work for personal and non-commercial use providing author and publisher attribution is clearly stated. Attribution should include the following information: Robson, E. 2019. Ancient Knowledge Networks: A Social Geography of Cuneiform Scholarship in First-Millennium Assyria and Babylonia. London: UCL Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787355941 Further details about Creative Commons licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Any third-party material in this book is published under the book’s Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in the credit line to the material. If you would like to re-use any third-party material not covered by the book’s Creative Commons license, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. ISBN: 978-1-78735-596-5 (Hbk.) ISBN: 978-1-78735-595-8 (Pbk.) ISBN: 978-1-78735-594-1 (PDF) ISBN: 978-1-78735-597-2 (epub) ISBN: 978-1-78735-598-9 (mobi) DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787355941 In memory of Bo Treadwell (1991–2014) Contents List of illustrations ix List of tables xv Acknowledgements xvi Bibliographical abbreviations xix Museum and excavation sigla xxi Dating conventions xxii Editorial conventions xxiii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Lambert 1820.Indd
    W. G. LAMBERT Wilfred George Lambert 1926–2011 W. G. LAMBERT was one of the most important Assyriologists of the latter part of the twentieth century. He made a greater contribution to the con- tinuing task of recovering and understanding Babylonian literature than any other member of his generation. In the essential skill of reading cuneiform signs inscribed on clay tablets, he excelled above all others. In his pursuit of knowledge and meaning, he brought an uncompromising and individual intellect to the study of cuneiform texts. He was always confident in his conclusions, quick to defend them and not prone to change his mind. He was suspicious of received opinion and scornful of those whose work was not founded, like his, on the most serious engage- ment with cuneiform texts and the languages in which they were written. For him the facts extracted from textual study were the basis and starting point for all understanding of ancient Mesopotamia. Concrete evidence meant far more to him than ideas and theory. Wilfred George Lambert was born on 26 February 1926 at 62 Chudleigh Road in Erdington, a modest suburb of north Birmingham. He was the younger child of Herbert Harold Lambert (1882–1951), a railway clerk from Whitacre, Warwickshire, and his wife, Zilla (née Allton, 1886–1958), the daughter of a joiner at a railway-carriage works in Birmingham. His parents were both born Methodist but converted to Christadelphianism. He was educated at local state schools and Christadelphian Sunday School, and remembered the latter as more stim- ulating. Bible study played a formative role in his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Development of Turkish and Oriental Studies in the German Speaking Lands1
    Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, Cilt 8, Sayı 15, 2010, 7-76 Notes on the Development of Turkish and Oriental Studies in the German Speaking Lands1 Christoph HERZOG* HISTORICALLY, the academic fields of Turkology and Turkish studies2 have emerged as a part of a discipline that will be termed here “Oriental studies.”3 For the past decade, an upsurge of interest in the history of Oriental studies in Germany has been experi- enced.4 Because of the overarching character of Oriental studies, the tendency has been to treat them together. In fact, it would be hardly imaginable to delineate the field of Turkish studies without taking into account the general background of Oriental studies.5 The Birth of Turkish Studies out of Orientalist Philology In the first decades of the 19th century an evident, if undramatic, upswing of interest in Oriental themes occurred in German cultural production. In translations, travelogues, poetry, novels, but also in the opera, the imagination of the Oriental was reproduced for * Prof., Turkish Studies at the University of Bamberg, Germany. 1 Special thanks to Wayne Brittenden, Werner Ende, Barbara Henning and Klaus Kreiser for help with this article. Of course, any remaining errors are still mine. 2 Both expressions can be used synonymously, but there is a tendency to confine the term “Turkish studies” to the study of Turkey and its history, including the Ottoman Empire. The expression “Turkic studies” refers to the purely linguistic field of study of the Turkic languages. In German no equivalent of this term exists. 3 The German term “Orientalische Studien” was used already in the 1830s, while the word “Orientalistik” seems to have been coined only at the end of the 19th century; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Exploration in Mesopotamia
    Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser, bind 33, nr. 6 Dan. Hist. Filol. Medd. 33, no. 6 (1954) EARLY EXPLORATION IN MESOPOTAMIA With a List of the Assyro-Babylonian Cuneiform Texts Published before 1851 BY SVEND AAGE PALLIS København i kommission hos Ejnar Munksgaard 1954 Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab udgiver følgende publikationsrækker : U Académie Royale des Sciences et des Lettres de Danemark publie les séries suivantes: Bibliografisk forkortelse Abréviation bibliographique Oversigt over selskabets virksomhed (8®) Dan. Vid. Selsk. Overs. (Annuaire) Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser (8®) Dan. Hist. Filol. Medd. Historisk-filologiske Skrifter (4®) Dan. Hist. Filol. Skr. (Histoire et Philologie) Arkæologisk-kunsthistoriske Meddelelser (8®) Dan. Arkæol. Kunsthist. Medd. -Arkæologisk-kunsthistoriske Skrifter (4®) Dan. Arkæol. Kunsthist. Skr. (Archéologie et Histoire de l’Art) Filosofiske Meddelelser (8®) Dan. Filos. Medd. (Philosophie) Matematisk-fysiske Meddelelser (8®) Dan. Mat. Fys. Medd. (Mathématiques et Physique) Biologiske Meddelelser (8®) Dan. Biol. Medd. Biologiske Skrifter (4®) Dan. Biol. Skr. (Biologie) Selskabets sekretariat og postadresse: Ny vestergade 23, København V. Uadresse postale du secrétariat de l’Académie est: Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Ny vestergade 23, Copenhague V, Danemark. Selskabets kommissionær: E jnar Munksgaard’s forlag, Nørregade 6, København K. ’ Les publications sont en vente chez le commissionnaire: Ejnar Munksgaard, éditeur. Nørregade 6, Copenhague K, Danemark. HISTORISK-FILOLOGISKE MEDDELELSER UDGIVET AF DET KGL. DANSKE VIDENSKABERNES SELSKAB BIND 33 KØBENHAVN 1950-54 I KOMMISSION HOS EJNAR MUNKSGAARD INDHOLD Side 1. Blinkenberg, Andreas: Le problème de l’accord en français moderne. Essai d’une typologie. 1950 ........................................ 1—180 2. Friis, Aage: Kong Oscar II’s Forhold til Danmark, det nord­ slesvigske Spørgsmaal og danske Venner.
    [Show full text]
  • Babylonian Astral Science in the Hellenistic World: Reception and Transmission
    CAS® e SERIES Nummer 4 / 2010 Francesca Rochberg (Berkeley) Babylonian Astral Science in the Hellenistic World: Reception and Transmission Herausgegeben von Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Center for Advanced Studies®, Seestr. 13, 80802 München www.cas.lmu.de/publikationen/eseries Nummer 4 / 2010 Babylonian Astral Science in the Hellenistic World: Reception and Transmission Francesca Rochberg (Berkeley) In his astrological work the Tetrabiblos, the astronomer such as in Strabo’s Geography, as well as in an astro- Ptolemy describes the effects of geography on ethnic nomical text from Oxyrhynchus in the second century character, claiming, for example, that due to their specific of our era roughly contemporary with Ptolemy [P.Oxy. geographical location „The ...Chaldeans and Orchinians 4139:8; see Jones 1999, I 97-99 and II 22-23]. This have familiarity with Leo and the sun, so that they are astronomical papyrus fragment refers to the Orchenoi, simpler, kindly, addicted to astrology.” [Tetr. 2.3] or Urukeans, in direct connection with a lunar parame- Ptolemy was correct in putting the Chaldeans and ter identifiable as a Babylonian period for lunar ano- Orchinians together geographically, as the Chaldeans, or maly preserved on cuneiform tablets from Uruk. The Kaldayu, were once West Semitic tribal groups located Babylonian, or Chaldean, literati, including those from in the parts of southern and western Babylonia known Uruk were rightly famed for astronomy and astrology, as Kaldu, and the Orchinians, or Urukayu, were the „addicted,” as Ptolemy put it, and eventually, in Greco- inhabitants of the southern Babylonian city of Uruk. He Roman works, the term Chaldean came to be interchan- was also correct in that he was transmitting a tradition geable with „astrologer.” from the Babylonians themselves, which, according to a Hellenistic Greek writers seeking to claim an authorita- Hellenistic tablet from Uruk [VAT 7847 obv.
    [Show full text]
  • LAW and RELIGIOUS MINORITIES in MEDIEVAL SOCIETIES: BETWEEN THEORY and PRAXIS Religion and Law in Medieval Christian and Muslim Societies 9
    LAW AND RELIGIOUS MINORITIES IN MEDIEVAL SOCIETIES: BETWEEN THEORY AND PRAXIS Religion and Law in Medieval Christian and Muslim Societies 9 Series Editor John Tolan Editorial Board: Camilla Adang, Tel Aviv University Nora Berend, Cambridge University Nicolas De Lange, Cambridge University Maribel Fierro, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Christian Müller, Institut de Recherches et d’Histoire des Textes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Kenneth Pennington, Catholic University of America Cette publication est réalisée dans le cadre du projet de recherche RELMIN « Le statut légal des minorités religieuses dans l’espace Euro-méditerranéen (ve – xve siècles) » La recherche qui a abouti à cette publication a été financée par le Conseil européen de la recherche sous le septième programme cadre de l’Union Européenne (FP7/2007‒2013) / ERC contrat no 249416. This publication is part of the research project RELMIN ““The Legal Status of Religious Minorities in the Euro-Mediterranean World (5th – 15th centuries)” The research leading to this publication has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Progamme (FP7/2007‒2013) /ERC grant agreement no 249416. Cette publication a reçu le soutien du projet de recherche Dynamiques Citoyennes en Europe (DCIE), financé par la région Pays de la Loire. Il a reçu le soutien également des universités du Mans et de Nantes, du CIERL (Centre interdisciplinaire d’étude des religions et de la laïcité, ULB) et le Zentrum für Mittelmeerstudien de l’Université de Bochum. © BREPOLS PUBLISHERS THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE PRINTED FOR PRIVATE USE ONLY. IT MAY NOT BE DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLISHER.
    [Show full text]