DOCSLIB.ORG

EFFECTS of SHINNERY OAK CONTROL with TEBUTHIURON on LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN POPULATIONS by CRAIG DONALD OLAWSKY, B.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EFFECTS of SHINNERY OAK CONTROL with TEBUTHIURON on LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN POPULATIONS by CRAIG DONALD OLAWSKY, B.S EFFECTS OF SHINNERY OAK CONTROL WITH TEBUTHIURON ON LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN POPULATIONS by CRAIG DONALD OLAWSKY, B.S. in Bio. Sci. A THESIS IN WILDLIFE SCIENCE Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for I the Degree of I MASTER OF SCIENCE \ \, Approved I" ' i Chairperson of~tee Accepted Graduate School December, 1987 © 1987 Craig Donald Olawsky ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my major advisor, Dr. Loren M. Smith for his assistance and advice throughout the study. I am grateful for the assistance and helpful suggestions of Drs. Russell D. Pettit, and M. Kent Rylander, who sacrificed their time to serve on my graduate committee. Sincere appreciation is extended to Dr. David B. Wester for invaluable guidance with statistical analysis. I wish to thank Paul Gray, Rosemary Heinen, Mike Davin, Susan Tsai, John Hunter, Dr. Brian Murphy, Tony Leif, Rich Casner, Denver McMurry, Jay Wipff, Martin Stein, James Jaspers, G. Allen Rasmussen, Gretchen Scott, Sheila Merrigan, Colleen Schreiber, Rich Reiner, Mary Candee, Val Sewell, David Stahlke, Ralph Godfrey, David Cook, David Price, Bill Wallace, Mark Miller, Tim Riojas, Robert Sites, David Lee, and Dan Lemkuil, all of whom contributed to the success of the project. For their friendship, encouragement, and help, I am especially indebted to Perry Grissom, Jim Bergan, David Haukos, Guy McPherson, Doug Sheeley, and Jeff Weigel. Financial support for this project was furnished by the Texas Noxious Brush and Weed Control line item. Dr. Henry A. Wright also provided financial assistance. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish supplied permits to collect ii lesser prairie-chickens. Frequent help was provided throughout this study by several members of the Soil conservation Service. Special thanks are extended to all landowners who graciously allowed the use of their lands for this research, primarily Randy Beasley, who provided the use of field station facilities. Finally, and foremost, I wish to thank my parents, Donald and Margerine Olawsky for their love, support, and encouragement. Their faith in me, especially during troubled times, made the completion of this project possible. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................... ii ABSTRACT .............................................. vi LIST OF TABLES ........................................ ix LIST OF FIGURES ....................................... xi CHAPTER I. EFFECTS OF SHINNERY OAK CONTROL ON LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN DENSITIES.. ................... 1 Introduction ............................... 1 Study Area ................................. 4 Methods .................................... 4 Weather ................................. 4 Study Plots ............................. 5 Vegetation Composition.. ................ 5 Density Estimates ....................... 6 Results ...............................•.... 9 Weather ................................. 9 Plant Composition....................... 9 Density • •••••••• 0 ••••••••••••••••••••••• 13 Discussion · ............................... 17 Management Implications. ................... 21 II. EFFECTS OF SHINNERY OAK CONTROL ON LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKEN DIET AND GUT MORPHOLOGY ....... 22 Introduction .. , ........ , , ................. 22 Study Area • ••••••••••••••••• 0 •••••••••••••• 24 iv Methods · .................................. 24 Results · .................................. 27 Precipitation..... ... ....... ..... ... .... 27 Diet .................................... 29 Gut Morphology .......................... 34 Discussion ................................. 37 Conclusions ................................ 43 III. NUTRIENT RESERVES OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS IN TREATED AND UNTREATED SHINNERY OAK RANGELAND ..................................... 45 Introduction ............................... 45 Study Area ................................. 47 Methods · .................................. 47 Results · .................................. 49 Body Weights ............................ 49 Carcass Components and Liver Weights. ... 49 Discussion 59 Conclusions ................................ 62 IV. MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS........... ......... 64 LITERATURE CITED ...................................... 66 APPENDICES A. VEGETATION OF THE STUDY AREA.................... 72 B. MORPHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTS OF LESSER PRAIRIE-CHICKENS ................................ 78 v ABSTRACT The herbicide tebuthiuron has been used in recent years to control sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) in west Texas and eastern New Mexico. However, the effects of shinnery oak control upon lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanllcblls 12allidicinctus) populations are not known. The range occupied by these birds has decreased over 90% since the 1800's. Therefore, expanding our knowledge of prairie­ chicken requirements and the impacts of various land-use practices upon the species is a high priority. Without such information, proper management of these birds is difficult. To determine the effects of shinnery oak control on lesser prairie-chickens, we made several comparisons between tebuthiuron-treated and untreated shinnery oak rangelands including: (1) vegetation composition, (2) densities of lesser prairie-chickens, (3) early summer diets and gut morphology, and (4) body condition of prairie-chickens. Forb and grass composition was higher in treated plots than in untreated plots. Densities of lesser prairie­ chickens were slightly higher in tebuthiuron-treated sites than in untreated plots for both seasons. Summer densities were 0.51 birds/ha in treated plots and 0.41 birds/ha in untreated plots. Winter densities were 0.53 birds/ha and 0.35 birds/ha in treated and untreated sites, respectively. vi prairie-chickens were also more difficult to detect in treated pastures than in untreated shinnery aCrosS seasons. Foods eaten by lesser prairie-chickens in treated pastures were different than foods eaten by prairie-chickens in untreated pastures. Shinnery oak acorns represented the major portion of the diet for birds collected in untreated shinnery, but were absent from the diet of birds in treated areas. Foliage and flowers comprised the majority of foods eaten in treated plots, but were less important to the diet of birds in untreated pastures. Prairie-chickens in untreated shinnery ate more insects than birds in treated plots during 1984. However, in 1985, insect consumption was similar between treatments. Differences in the sizes of digestive organs corresponded to differences in diet. Small intestines and caeca were longer in prairie-chickens from tebuthiuron­ treated sites than in birds from untreated plots, presumably because of the increased consumption of foliage. Conversely, gizzard weights were higher among birds from untreated shinnery, possibly as a result of greater acorn consumption in that treatment type. Lesser prairie-chickens collected from untreated shinnery had higher lipid levels than birds in treated pastures, indicating that they were in better overall condition. Higher lipid levels appeared to be correlated with consumption of acorns, seeds, and fruits. Protein vii levels of prairie-chickens increased from 1984 to 1985. Higher protein levels corresponded to increased insect consumption. Lesser prairie-chickens could most likely benefit from an interspersion of both tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangeland. viii LIST OF TABLES 1.1 Monthly precipitation (cm) and deviation from the 3D-year average (cm) for the study area, 1985-1986 ........................................ 10 1.2 Percent basal composition of vegetation in treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands ....................................... 11 1.3 Density of lesser prairie-chickens in tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands during summer (July-September) 1985 and winter (January-February) 1986 .......... 14 2.1 Monthly precipitation (cm) and deviation from the 3D-year average (cm and percent) for the study area ....................................... 28 2.2 Food items from lesser prairie-chickens (N=42) collected during summer (27 May-3 July) in tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands of west Texas and eastern New Mexico ....................................... 30 2.3 F-values from 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of lengths and weights of digestive tract parts of lesser prairie-chickens collected May-July, 1984-85 from tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands........... .......... 35 2.4 Average weights (g) and lengths (cm) of the digestive tracts' of lesser prairie-chickens collected from tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands............ ..... .... 36 3.1 F-values from 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of body weight (BW) , liver weight, and carcass components of male lesser prairie-chickens collected from tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands during summer 1984-85 .......................................... 50 3.2 Comparison of body weight, liver weight, and carcass components (g) of male lesser prairie­ chickens collected 27 May-3 July, 1984-1985 from tebuthiuron-treated and untreated sand shinnery oak rangelands of west Texas and eastern New Mexico ........................................... 51 ix F-values from 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of body weight (BW), liver weight, and carcass components of female lesser prairie-chickens collected from tebuthiuron-treated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 31295015064529.Pdf (3.477Mb)
    POPULATION DYNAMICS, REPRODUCTION, AND ACTIVITIES OF THE KANGAROO RAT, DIPODOMYS ORDII, IN WESTERN TEXAS by HERSCHEL VJHITAKER GARNER, B.S., M.S. A DISSERTATION IN ZOOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Accepted August, 1970 ACKNOWL EDGMENTS I am especially grateful to Professor Robert L. Packard for advising in research methods, aiding in collecting data, and critically reading the manuscript. Additional appreciated suggestions were made by Professors Archie C. Allen, John S. Mecham, Robert W.. Mitchell, Paul V. Prior (now at the University of Nebraska- Omaha), and Chester M. Rowell. Mr. Robert B. Wadley pro­ vided useful help in developing computer programs used in sorting and analysis of the data. An honorarium from the Department of Biology defrayed some of the cost of travel to the field. My wife, Anita, aided in making collections and recording data. Additional thanks are extended to fellow graduate students who provided help and ideas.' 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES ; . iv LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS V I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. METHODS AND MATERIALS 3 III. REPRODUCTION 15 IV. ACTIVITIES 35 V. POPULATION DYNAMICS 43 VI. SUMlvlARY AND CONCLUSIONS 72 LITERATURE CITED 76 111 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Estimation of number of D. ordii on the Kermit area 51 IV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. The intensive study area viewed from the southern periphery June, 1956 .... 5 2. Diagram of study area showing position of activity center values of animals used in the experimental activity studies 12 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report: Lesser Prairie-Chicken Survey − Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands, 2014
    Final Report: Lesser Prairie-Chicken Survey − Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands, 2014 Project Manager: Angela Dwyer, Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, 230 Cherry St., Fort Collins, CO 80521 ([email protected]) Project Director: David Hanni, Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, 230 Cherry St., Fort Collins, CO 80521 ([email protected]) Introduction The Lesser Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) (LEPC) occupies grassland habitat consisting of sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia), sand shinnery oak (Quercus havardii) and mixed grass vegetation communities of the southern Great Plains. Since the 19th century, LEPC and the habitat upon which they depend has diminished across their historical range (Crawford and Bolen 1976, Taylor and Guthery 1980a), with recent estimates of current occupied range totaling approximately 17% of the estimated area of their historical range. Causes for this reduction in occupied range are primarily attributed to habitat loss and fragmentation (USFWS 2012). Habitat loss has been caused by conversion of native prairie to cropland (Bent 1932, Copelin 1963, Taylor and Guthery 1980) and long term fire suppression (Woodward et al. 2001) leading to tree invasion (Fuhlendorf et al. 2002). Grazing management practices would help improve habitat if managed to benefit LEPC. Heavily grazed fields that leave no residual vegetation for broods can be detrimental to LEPC (Sell 1979, Hunt and Best 2010). Habitat fragmentation has resulted from a combination of habitat loss and degradation caused by oil and gas development (Hunt 2004) and suspected effects of wind energy development (Pruett et al. 2009). The LEPC is not thought to occur in Kiowa and Rita Blanca National Grasslands (KRB) (Giesen 2003), however some parcels within the grasslands are managed for LEPC.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunes Sagebrush Lizard Habitat
    TECHNICAL NOTES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE NEW MEXICO September, 2011 BIOLOGY TECHNICAL NOTE NO. 53 CRITERIA FOR BRUSH MANAGEMENT (314) in Lesser Prairie-Chicken and Dunes Sagebrush Lizard Habitat Introduction NRCS policy requires that when providing technical and financial assistance NRCS will recommend only conservation treatments that will avoid or minimize adverse effects, and to the extent practicable, provide long-term benefit to federal candidate species (General Manual 190 Part 410.22(E)(7)). This technical note provides the criteria to ensure that the NRCS practice of Brush Management (314) will avoid or minimize any adverse effects to two Candidate Species for Federal listing: the lesser prairie chicken Tympanuchus pallidicinctus (LEPC), and dunes sagebrush lizard Sceloporus arenicolus (DSL). Species Involved The lesser prairie chicken is a species of prairie grouse native to the southern high plains of the U.S.; including the sandhill rangelands of eastern New Mexico. The dunes sagebrush lizard is native only to a small area of southeastern New Mexico and west Texas, with a habitat range that overlaps the lesser prairie chicken range, but only occurs in the sand dune complexes associated with shinnery oak (Quercus havardii Rydb.). Both species’ habitat includes a component of brush: shinnery oak and/or sand sagebrush (Artemisia filifolia Torr.). See Appendix 1 and 2 for more details on each species. Geographic Area Covered by Technical Note No. 53 encompasses private and state lands within the range that supports the dunes sagebrush lizard and lesser prairie chicken habitat. This includes portions of seven counties in New Mexico: Chaves, Curry, De Baca, Eddy, Lea, Roosevelt, and Quay counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montana's Glaciated
    Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Prepared by: Stephen V. Cooper, Catherine Jean and Paul Hendricks December, 2001 Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report 2001 Montana Natural Heritage Program Montana State Library P.O. Box 201800 Helena, Montana 59620-1800 (406) 444-3009 BLM Agreement number 1422E930A960015 Task Order # 25 This document should be cited as: Cooper, S. V., C. Jean and P. Hendricks. 2001. Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains. Report to the Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Pro- gram, Helena. 24 pp. plus appendices. Executive Summary Throughout much of the Great Plains, grasslands limited number of Black-tailed Prairie Dog have been converted to agricultural production colonies that provide breeding sites for Burrow- and as a result, tall-grass prairie has been ing Owls. Swift Fox now reoccupies some reduced to mere fragments. While more intact, portions of the landscape following releases the loss of mid - and short- grass prairie has lead during the last decade in Canada. Great Plains to a significant reduction of prairie habitat Toad and Northern Leopard Frog, in decline important for grassland obligate species. During elsewhere, still occupy some wetlands and the last few decades, grassland nesting birds permanent streams. Additional surveys will have shown consistently steeper population likely reveal the presence of other vertebrate declines over a wider geographic area than any species, especially amphibians, reptiles, and other group of North American bird species small mammals, of conservation concern in (Knopf 1994), and this alarming trend has been Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi-Arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico." (2007)
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Special Publications Museum of Southwestern Biology 5-10-2007 Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi- arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico Andrew G. Hope Robert R. Parmenter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/msb_special_publications Recommended Citation Hope, Andrew G. and Robert R. Parmenter. "Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico." (2007). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/msb_special_publications/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum of Southwestern Biology at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Special Publications by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE MUSEUM OF SOUTHWESTERN BIOLOGY NUMBER 9, pp. 1–75 10 May 2007 Food Habits of Rodents Inhabiting Arid and Semi-arid Ecosystems of Central New Mexico ANDREW G. HOPE AND ROBERT R. PARMENTER1 Special Publication of the Museum of Southwestern Biology 1 CONTENTS Abstract................................................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Study Sites ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Water Native Plants for Colorado Gardens: Prairie and Plains
    Low-Water Native Plants for Colorado Gardens: Prairie and Plains Published by the Colorado Native Plant Society 1 Prairie and Plains Region Denver Botanic Gardens, Chatfield Photo by Irene Shonle Introduction This range map is approximate. Please be familiar with your area to know which This is one in a series of regional native planting guides that are a booklet is most appropriate for your landscape. collaboration of the Colorado Native Plant Society, CSU Extension, Front Range Wild Ones, the High Plains Environmental Center, Butterfly The Colorado native plant gardening guides cover these 5 regions: Pavilion and the Denver Botanic Gardens. Plains/Prairie Front Range/Foothills Many people have an interest in landscaping with native plants, Southeastern Colorado and the purpose of this booklet is to help people make the most Mountains above 7,500 feet successful choices. We have divided the state into 5 different regions Lower Elevation Western Slope that reflect different growing conditions and life zones. These are: the plains/prairie, Southeastern Colorado, the Front Range/foothills, the This publication was written by the Colorado Native Plant Society Gardening mountains above 7,500’, and lower elevation Western Slope. Find the Guide Committee: Committee Chair, Irene Shonle, Director, CSU Extension, area that most closely resembles your proposed garden site for the Gilpin County; Nick Daniel, Horticulturist, Denver Botanic Gardens; Deryn best gardening recommendations. Davidson, Horticulture Agent, CSU Extension, Boulder County; Susan Crick, Front Range Chapter, Wild Ones; Jim Tolstrup, Executive Director, High Plains Why Native? Environmental Center (HPEC); Jan Loechell Turner, Colorado Native Plant There are many benefits to using Colorado native plants for home Society (CoNPS); Amy Yarger, Director of Horticulture, Butterfly Pavilion.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), Including Artemisia and Its Allied and Segregate Genera Linda E
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 9-26-2002 Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera Linda E. Watson Miami University, [email protected] Paul E. Bates University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Timonthy M. Evans Hope College, [email protected] Matthew M. Unwin Miami University, [email protected] James R. Estes University of Nebraska State Museum, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub Watson, Linda E.; Bates, Paul E.; Evans, Timonthy M.; Unwin, Matthew M.; and Estes, James R., "Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera" (2002). Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences. 378. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscifacpub/378 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications in the Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central Research2 BMC2002, Evolutionary article Biology x Open Access Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera Linda E Watson*1, Paul L Bates2, Timothy M Evans3,
    [Show full text]
  • Clonal Population Structure and Genetic Variation in Sand-Shinnery Oak, Quercus Havardii (Fagaceae)1
    American Journal of Botany 85(11): 1609±1617. 1998. CLONAL POPULATION STRUCTURE AND GENETIC VARIATION IN SAND-SHINNERY OAK, QUERCUS HAVARDII (FAGACEAE)1 STEVEN G. MAYES,MARK A. MCGINLEY, AND CHARLES R. WERTH2 Ecology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409±3131 We investigated clonal population structure and genetic variation in Quercus havardii (sand-shinnery oak), a deciduous rhizomatous shrub that dominates vegetation by forming uninterrupted expanses of ground cover over sandy deposits on the plains of western Texas, western Oklahoma, and eastern New Mexico. Isozyme electrophoresis (15 loci coding 11 enzymes) was used to recognize and map clones arrayed in a 2000-m transect (50-m sample intervals) and a 200 3 190 m grid (10-m sample intervals). Ninety-four clones were discovered, 38 in the transect and 56 in the grid, resulting in an estimated density of ;15 clones per hectare. Clones varied greatly in size (;100±7000 m2), shape, and degree of fragmen- tation. The larger clones possessed massive interiors free of intergrowth by other clones, while the smaller clones varied in degree of intergrowth. The population maintained substantial levels of genetic variation (P 5 60%, A 5 2.5, Hexp 5 0.289) comparable to values obtained for other Quercus spp. and for other long-lived perennials. The population was outcrossing as evidenced by conformance of most loci to Hardy-Weinberg expected genotype proportions, although exceptions indicated a limited degree of population substructuring. These data indicate that despite apparent reproduction primarily through vegetative means, Q. havardii possesses conventional attributes of a sexual population.
    [Show full text]
  • Artemisia, Asteraceae)
    Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 94, 631–649. With 5 figures Evolutionary and ecological implications of genome size in the North American endemic sagebrushes and allies (Artemisia, Asteraceae) SÒNIA GARCIA1*, MIGUEL Á. CANELA2, TERESA GARNATJE3, E. DURANT MCARTHUR4, JAUME PELLICER1, STEWART C. SANDERSON4 and JOAN VALLÈS1 1Laboratori de Botànica, Facultat de Farmàcia, Universitat de Barcelona. Avinguda Joan XXIII s. n., 08028 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain 2Departament de Matemàtica aplicada i Anàlisi, Facultat de Matemàtiques, Universitat de Barcelona. Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 585, 08007 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain 3Institut Botànic de Barcelona (CSIC-ICUB), Passeig del Migdia s. n., Parc de Montjuïc, 08038. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain 4Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Provo, UT 84606, USA Received 25 May 2007; accepted for publication 2 October 2007 The genome size of 51 populations of 20 species of the North American endemic sagebrushes (subgenus Triden- tatae), related species, and some hybrid taxa were assessed by flow cytometry, and were analysed in a phylogenetic framework. Results were similar for most Tridentatae species, with the exception of three taxonomically conflictive species: Artemisia bigelovii Gray, Artemisia pygmaea Gray, and Artemisia rigida Gray. Genome size homogeneity (together with the high morphological, chemical, and karyological affinities, as well as low DNA sequence divergence) could support a recent diversification process in this geographically restricted group, thought to be built upon a reticulate evolutionary framework. The Tridentatae and the other North American endemic Artemisia show a significantly higher genome size compared with the other subgenera. Our comparative analyses including genome size results, together with different kinds of ecological and morphological traits, suggest an evolutionary change in lifestyle strategy linked to genome expansion, in which junk or selfish DNA accumulation might be involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus (Fagaceae) in the Utah Flora
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 46 Number 1 Article 7 1-31-1986 Quercus (Fagaceae) in the Utah flora Stanley L. Welsh Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L. (1986) "Quercus (Fagaceae) in the Utah flora," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 46 : No. 1 , Article 7. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol46/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. — QUERCUS (FAGACEAE) IN THE UTAH FLORA Stanley L. Welsh' Abstract —Reviewed are the oak taxa as they are presently understood in Utah. Keys and descriptions are included, occurrences are cited, and problems of hybridization are discussed. Named as new varieties from Utah are Qticrcus gambelii Nutt. var. honina Welsh and Qucrcus havardii Rydb. var. tuckeri Welsh. Both varieties occur in southeastern Utah. Qttercus eastwoodicie Rydb. is proposed as a hybrid. The native oaks have been a source of con- ella Greene, and Q. havardii Rydb. Within fusion ahnost from the beginning of botanical those complexes the species concepts are mostly exploration, and a huge bibliography has ac- clear and unarguable, but they have no really cumulated dealing with the oaks of Utah and apparent barriers to hybridization, and interme- the West (Harper et al. 1985). Collection of diates are known between nearly all of them, the materials serving in typification of the ear- The following taxonomic treatment is based liest known portion of the complex of species on the examination of more than 300 specimens existing in Utah confounded interpretation "i Utah herbaria and more than three decades of from the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks
    Article An Updated Infrageneric Classification of the North American Oaks (Quercus Subgenus Quercus): Review of the Contribution of Phylogenomic Data to Biogeography and Species Diversity Paul S. Manos 1,* and Andrew L. Hipp 2 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, 330 Bio Sci Bldg, Durham, NC 27708, USA 2 The Morton Arboretum, Center for Tree Science, 4100 Illinois 53, Lisle, IL 60532, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The oak flora of North America north of Mexico is both phylogenetically diverse and species-rich, including 92 species placed in five sections of subgenus Quercus, the oak clade centered on the Americas. Despite phylogenetic and taxonomic progress on the genus over the past 45 years, classification of species at the subsectional level remains unchanged since the early treatments by WL Trelease, AA Camus, and CH Muller. In recent work, we used a RAD-seq based phylogeny including 250 species sampled from throughout the Americas and Eurasia to reconstruct the timing and biogeography of the North American oak radiation. This work demonstrates that the North American oak flora comprises mostly regional species radiations with limited phylogenetic affinities to Mexican clades, and two sister group connections to Eurasia. Using this framework, we describe the regional patterns of oak diversity within North America and formally classify 62 species into nine major North American subsections within sections Lobatae (the red oaks) and Quercus (the Citation: Manos, P.S.; Hipp, A.L. An Quercus Updated Infrageneric Classification white oaks), the two largest sections of subgenus . We also distill emerging evolutionary and of the North American Oaks (Quercus biogeographic patterns based on the impact of phylogenomic data on the systematics of multiple Subgenus Quercus): Review of the species complexes and instances of hybridization.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mast-Seeding Desert Shrub Regulates Population Dynamics and Behavior of Its Heteromyid Dispersers Janene Auger1,†, Susan E
    A mast-seeding desert shrub regulates population dynamics and behavior of its heteromyid dispersers Janene Auger1,†, Susan E. Meyer2 & Stephen H. Jenkins3 1Program in Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 2USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station, Shrub Sciences Laboratory, Provo, Utah 84606 3Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 Keywords Abstract Blackbrush, Coleogyne ramosissima, Dipodomys ordii, interference competition, Granivorous rodent populations in deserts are primarily regulated through pre- kangaroo rat, optimal caching theory, cipitation-driven resource pulses rather than pulses associated with mast-seed- Perognathus flavescens, pocket mouse, ing, a pattern more common in mesic habitats. We studied heteromyid resource abundance hypothesis, responses to mast-seeding in the desert shrub blackbrush (Coleogyne ramosis- scatterhoarding. sima), a regionally dominant species in the Mojave–Great Basin Desert transi- tion zone. In a 5-year study at Arches National Park, Utah, USA, we quantified Correspondence spatiotemporal variation in seed resources in mast and intermast years in black- Susan Meyer, USFS Shrub Sciences Laboratory, 735 North 500 East, Provo, UT brush-dominated and mixed desert vegetation and measured responses of 84606. Dipodomys ordii (Ord’s kangaroo rat) and Perognathus flavescens (plains pocket Tel: 801 356 5122; mouse). In blackbrush-dominated vegetation, blackbrush seeds comprised Fax: 801 375 6968; >79% of seed production in a mast year, but 0% in the first postmast year. E-mail: [email protected] Kangaroo rat abundance in blackbrush-dominated vegetation was highest in the mast year, declined sharply at the end of the first postmast summer, and then Present address remained at low levels for 3 years.
    [Show full text]