DOCSLIB.ORG

Feminist Counter-Publicity in the Digital Age

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feminist Counter-Publicity in the Digital Age Strange Spaces & Stranger Sensibilities: Feminist Counter-Publicity in the Digital Age by Bonnie Marilyn Washick A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Elizabeth R. Wingrove (Chair) Assistant Professor André L. Brock Professor Lisa J. Disch Professor Don Herzog Associate Professor Mika LaVaque-Manty © Bonnie Marilyn Washick 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In undertaking this project, it often seemed that writing was a brutal thing. There’s always more that could be said and, one suspects, more that is worth exploring before committing words to the page. What a pleasure, then, to write with such blistering certainty: I could not have done this without the guidance, advocacy, and support of many people. A thousand thanks are owed; I am grateful for the space to pay some small portion of that debt. I must begin by thanking my committee: Lisa Disch, André Brock, Don Herzog, Mika LaVaque-Manty, and my Dissertation Chair, Elizabeth Wingrove. I am so appreciative of Lisa Disch’s incisive reading and productively challenging feedback. André’s in-depth knowledge and experience with the study of digital media was invaluable, and I’m certain will continue to be so. Many thanks to Don Herzog for his willingness to go over my work with a fine-tooth comb, or simply riff on a theme over coffee. I probably should have taken you up more on the former, but it was the latter that made me excited about work. Thanks to Mika LaVaque-Manty for serving as my teaching mentor in addition to serving on my committee, and modeling an enthusiastic, inquisitive, and student-like (in the best of ways) approach to innovation in the classroom. It’s impossible to acknowledge in a few words the many ways in which my Chair, Liz Wingrove, made this work possible. No one has been a better advocate for me or for ii my project, and no one has had a greater influence on my development as a scholar. Thank you for your time, your encouragement, your expert guidance, and your thoughtful insight—I’m so fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with you. Many dedicated thanks are owed to particular University of Michigan institutions and the people I met there. I am grateful for feedback on several dissertation chapters provided by participants in the department of political science’s Political Theory Workshop. Special thanks to my personal cohort of political science graduate students: Erin Baribeau, Diana Greenwald, Marc Levesque, Elizabeth Mann, Neveser Köker, Ben Peterson, Damien Picariello, Justin Williams, and Alton Worthington. And a whole- hearted thanks to the department’s staff and especially Kathryn Cardenas, without whom I would have been lost many times over. Thanks to the Institute for the Research on Women and Gender’s Community of Scholars fellowship program and especially its 2012 coordinator, Hannah Rosen. Thanks to Paulina Duda, Jenny Kwak, Sarah Sutter, and Hunter Werkheiser for feedback and for keeping me on task. And thanks to the Sweetland Center for Writing for organizing and supporting our dissertation writing group and the immensely helpful Dissertation Writing Institute (and here, Louis Cicciarelli deserves a special thanks for his expert guidance). I am grateful to the Center for the Education of Women and the Institute for the Humanities (IH) for providing support in my final year. The time, office space, and inter- disciplinary community afforded by the IH’s Society of Fellows was invaluable, as was the collegial companionship of several graduate student fellows: David Green, Sarah Linwick, Elizabeth Keslacy, Pascal Massinon, and Rostom Mesli. iii Thanks to the many friends and loved ones outside Ann Arbor who provided a much needed respite: Michelle Abramovich, Jennica Bramble, Christine Hassel, Tania Prizio, Colleen Sphar-Nuñez, Rachel Wood, Elissa Yotsuji, and, of course, my family: Al, Christine, Denise, and Laurie. (Here, special thanks must go to Denise Washick for generously taking on the tedious task of proofreading my bibliography and helping with the final edit). And finally, special thanks are owed to three dear friends who are also colleagues: to Logan Casey for helping me wrangle disordered thoughts and writing processes, and reminding me to be kind to myself when I struggled to do these things; to Josh Shipper for office talks and walks, and for modeling intellectual curiosity that is critical, but not combative; and to Jess Steinberg for calling when I “casually” text to ask if you have a minute, for letting me vent, and leaving me laughing. When this work felt monstrous, you helped me remember why I wrote and to find a way forward. Thank you. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii LIST OF FIGURES vi ABSTRACT vii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE: Cultivating ‘the Real’ Cyberspace: The Ontopolitics of Computer-Mediated Communication 27 CHAPTER TWO: ‘Unconventional’ Women and the Paradoxes of Early Feminist Computer-Mediated Communication 67 CHAPTER THREE: Embodying Public Speech: The Feminist Politics of Safety Online 103 CHAPTER FOUR: On ‘Trigger Warnings’: Tough Subjects, Revolting Subjects, and the Publicization of Structural Harm 151 CONCLUSION 180 BIBLIOGRAPHY 190 v LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Screenshot of the Object-Oriented MUD, LambdaMOO. 36 FIGURE 2: Screenshot from Olduse.net, a real time exhibit showing 73 what Usenet looked like 30 years prior. FIGURE 3: Screenshot from the feminist blog, Feministe, illustrating the 120 prominent placement of a comment policy. FIGURE 4: Screenshot of a “fluffinated” comment at Feministe. 122 FIGURE 5: Screenshot of a “disemvoweled” comment at Finally, a 122 Feminism 101 Blog. FIGURE 6: Screenshot of a “trigger warning” at the feminist blog, Crunk 125 Feminist Collective. FIGURE 7: Screenshot of “content notes” at the feminist blog, Shakesville. 126 FIGURE 8: Screenshot from the Twitter feed of “Jock Halberslam” 179 (@halberslam) . FIGURE 9: Image from Amanda Marcotte’s It’s a Jungle Out There: 183 The Feminist Survival Guide to Politically Inhospitable Environments (2007). vi ABSTRACT Strange Spaces and Stranger Sensibilities: Feminist Counter-Publicity in the Digital Age by Bonnie Marilyn Washick Chair: Elizabeth Wingrove This dissertation offers a theoretical account of the politics of feminist computer- mediated communication (CMC), arguing that both the discursive dimensions of CMC and the affordances of CMC platforms cultivate new public subjects. The analysis challenges dominant approaches to the politics of online public speech that remain tethered to liberal public sphere theory or more recently, to radical democratic theory. I do so by attending to the enduring significance of embodiment—specifically, the embodied particularity of public speakers and of their addressees—in over thirty years of feminist CMC. Examining diverse moments from that history, I suggest that feminist CMC contributes to democratic theory and theories of language politics through its enactment of a “feminized” public subject: a subject whose acknowledged vulnerabilities demand attention to social and political inequality as they reframe it and whose communicative practices engender productively new, and newly contrary, postures of agonistic struggle. vii Chapter One explores early discourse about “cyberspace” as a new public sphere. Disambiguating conflicting accounts of what disembodied communication enabled, I show how a liberal conception of public speech was rearticulated as both an ideal and an impossibility online, thus diminishing the perceived political value of CMC. Chapter Two examines feminist speech on Usenet, an early and influential CMC platform. I illustrate how affordances of public CMC defanged the political speech of Usenet feminists, rendering it the equivalent of what Lauren Berlant terms “female complaint.” Chapter Three argues that the “safe spaces” of the contemporary feminist blogosphere cultivate an alternative “feminized” subject whose complaints are better understood as political demands that challenge rather than reflect neoliberal hegemony. Chapter Four considers the recent migration of trigger warnings (TWs) from online to offline spaces, in order to probe the reception of the “feminized” political subject. Pursuing the affective resonances between what researchers have termed “white fragility” and the reception of TWs, I consider how a viscerally-charged rejection of embodied vulnerability works to sustain the phantasmatic figure of an abstract, sovereign self in left-progressive as well as liberal political visions. viii INTRODUCTION THEORIZING THE POLITICS OF COUNTER-PUBLICITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE … they fight as much for the preservation of themselves as they fight for the preservation of others. This movement toward consciousness—born of techno advocacy practices that span computer mediated and non-computer mediated contexts– is a threshold where we can see ourselves through the eyes of others and by way of panoramic views. - Tara L. Conley, “An Open Letter to Amanda Marcotte”1 I. Introduction This dissertation offers a theoretical account of the politics of feminist computer- mediated communication (CMC). I proceed by tracing the development of collaborative, formally open-access online feminist speech communities over more than thirty years. My account attends to the entanglement of, on the one hand, the “poetic” function of public address in cultivating—through generic form, style, mode of delivery, protocols, and content—the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quality of Life Survey – Key Findings
    Quality of Life Survey – Key Findings Student Affairs Commiee March 30th, 2014 Quality of Life What? • University-wide survey designed to measure student quality of life on qualitative and quantitative levels. – Recommendations derived from data will drive short-, mid-, and long-term proJects to improve student quality of life. Why? • There has never been a comprehensive, campus-wide assessment of Columbia students’ quality of life. – Several schools and departments have surveys for specific needs, but they sometimes lack rigor and the ability to draw conclusions from a broad network of variables. 2 Quality of Life How? • 13 Categories: - Funding, Housing, Academics, Social Life, Transportation, Safety, Libraries, Space, Career Preparation, Administration, Fitness, Technology, and Health • Four parts in each category: - Satisfaction - Specific satisfaction questions per category - Importance - Satisfaction * Importance = Impact - Open-ended recommendation question per category • Randomized order of categories • Wide variety of variables: – 16 Demographic Variables – 84 Satisfaction Variables – 13 Importance Variables – 55 Personality Variables 3 Quality of Life — Timeline • Fall 2012: Survey Design and Development – Behavioral Research Lab at the Columbia Business School • February 2013: Pilot to selected students • February – April 2013: Engaged stakeholders and Improved Survey • April 2013: Launched Survey • 2013-2014: Analysis and Recommendations 4 Number of Responses Emailed to 36,000 students In 20 different schools Over 8,650 surveys started Over 6,250 completed responses Overall response rate of 17.1% 5 School Response Rates 35% 33% 33% 30% 30% 25% 25% 25% 25% 24% 21% 19% 20% 19% 17% 17% 14% 15% 14% 12% 12% 11% 10% 10% 10% 9% 9% 5% 0% Altogether, out of Columbia’s 2012 enrollment of over 36,000 full-time and part-time students, we received 6,276 complete responses.
    [Show full text]
  • NARAL Ep5 V04 20200623.Mp3
    NARAL_Ep5_v04_20200623.mp3 Jess McIntosh [00:00:00] This limited series podcast is based on the book, "The Lie that Binds" by NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue with Ellie Langford. Each episode builds on the history terminology and figureheads established in the last. So we strongly recommend that you start from episode one before jumping ahead. Brianna Wu [00:00:18] The truth is, GamerGate is less of an event and more of a playbook to use against someone you don't like. Jess McIntosh [00:00:26] This is Brianna Wu, co-founder of independent videogame studio Giant SpaceKat. Brianna Wu [00:00:32] This is the GamerGate playbook. Find someone you want to shut up. Go to their entire life. Go through all their social media posts. Investigate them and find something to attack them with. And then get an army of people online to scream from the hills about this fact which may or may not be true and destroyed their reputation. The idea is to make the cost of speaking out so high that it's easier to just remain silent. Jess McIntosh [00:00:59] The GamerGate controversy started in August 2014. Brianna Wu [00:01:01] All through 2014 my women colleagues were being basically bullied out of the industry. Jess McIntosh [00:01:09] It was set off after game developer Zoe Quinn was falsely accused by their ex-boyfriend of sleeping with a videogame journalist to garner positive reviews for their company's new game. This led to an avalanche of rape threats, doxing and death threats against Quinn, as well as women who criticized sexism in the game industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia University School of General Studies
    COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GENERAL STUDIES GUIDE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS 1 Table of Contents Academic Life .................................................................................................................................... 3 Advising .............................................................................................................................................. 4 English Language Concerns ............................................................................................................ 6 Work Authorization .......................................................................................................................... 7 Career Advising ................................................................................................................................. 8 Student Life ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Housing ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Navigating Columbia’s Health and Wellness Resources............................................................ 11 School of General Studies Alumni................................................................................................ 14 Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Important Legal Terms .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Barnard College Notification Date
    Barnard College Notification Date Isa disheveling suppliantly. Is Skipp loonies or crimpy when baizes some aerophyte adjust blamably? Is Ralf appeasable when Armond spoofs inly? Please write all applicable requirements prior to applying for admission. Tell us in the comments below perhaps we will research it to easily list! In a short period of time, I readily determined that this is absolutely possible for me, and that there was no reason for me to have taken the proverbially easier way out. If you attend a college on the quarter system, the transcript should include grades from the fall and winter quarter of the current academic year. You must not copy, download, print, or otherwise distribute the content on our site without the prior written consent of The Ivy Coach, Inc. And college choice college is too had on our faculty and high school treats the date to the gender, there are looking for admission. Declared previously been lower than ever, access to date, and all colleges release date will have a description to have a meaningful and gpa requirement. Barnard does not rate the optional SAT essay section or she Subject tests. Notice our school of party not listed? Leading scholars program: barnard college does! Optional FAQ page of. Products and college helps you entered is no stranger to date. Deposit to enroll in Columbia University. Barnard offers two rounds of first-year admission Early Decision and Regular Decision. Barnard College Admissions Statistics. The optional policies, but it sooner rather than expected from our gpa! And Regular Decision notifications! Read tips on grants, scholarships, loans and more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of Enforcing Border Security Versus the Reality of Enforcing Dominant Masculinities
    California Western Law Review Volume 56 Number 1 Article 4 2-15-2020 The Myth of Enforcing Border Security Versus the Reality of Enforcing Dominant Masculinities Jamie R. Abrams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr Recommended Citation Abrams, Jamie R. (2020) "The Myth of Enforcing Border Security Versus the Reality of Enforcing Dominant Masculinities," California Western Law Review: Vol. 56 : No. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.cwsl.edu/cwlr/vol56/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CWSL Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in California Western Law Review by an authorized editor of CWSL Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abrams: The Myth of Enforcing Border Security Versus the Reality of Enfor Abrams camera ready FINAL (Do Not Delete) 1/22/2020 11:43 AM THE MYTH OF ENFORCING BORDER SECURITY VERSUS THE REALITY OF ENFORCING DOMINANT MASCULINITIES JAMIE R. ABRAMS∗ I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................... 70 II. ENFORCING MASCULINITIES AT THE BORDER ................................. 73 III. HOW TRUMP DEPLOYED “RAPISTS,” “BAD HOMBRES,” AND“ANIMALS” IN A TOXIC MIXTURE OF RACE, XENOPHOBIA, AND MASCULINITIES............................................................................. 74 A. Trump’s Rise to Power .......................................................... 75 B. Masculinities Manipulation .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Excavating the Sex Discrimination Roots of Campus Sexual Assault
    Pittsburgh University School of Law Scholarship@PITT LAW Articles Faculty Publications 2017 Back to Basics: Excavating the Sex Discrimination Roots of Campus Sexual Assault Deborah Brake University of Pittsburgh School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Education Law Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Higher Education Administration Commons, Law and Gender Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Deborah Brake, Back to Basics: Excavating the Sex Discrimination Roots of Campus Sexual Assault, 6 Tennessee Journal of Race, Gender & Social Justice 7 (2017). Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship@PITT LAW. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@PITT LAW. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. BACK TO BASICS: EXCAVATING THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ROOTS OF CAMPUS SEXUAL ASSAULT Deborah L. Brake* Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 I. Liberal Feminism and Women’s Leadership Meet Dominance Feminism and Sexual Subordination ....................................................................................... 9 II. The Gender-Blind Discourses of Campus Sexual Assault ............................
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Bridget Christine Gelms Candidate for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ______________________________________ Dr. Jason Palmeri, Director ______________________________________ Dr. Tim Lockridge, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Michele Simmons, Reader ______________________________________ Dr. Lisa Weems, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT VOLATILE VISIBILITY: THE EFFECTS OF ONLINE HARASSMENT ON FEMINIST CIRCULATION AND PUBLIC DISCOURSE by Bridget C. Gelms As our digital environments—in their inhabitants, communities, and cultures—have evolved, harassment, unfortunately, has become the status quo on the internet (Duggan, 2014 & 2017; Jane, 2014b). Harassment is an issue that disproportionately affects women, particularly women of color (Citron, 2014; Mantilla, 2015), LGBTQIA+ women (Herring et al., 2002; Warzel, 2016), and women who engage in social justice, civil rights, and feminist discourses (Cole, 2015; Davies, 2015; Jane, 2014a). Whitney Phillips (2015) notes that it’s politically significant to pay attention to issues of online harassment because this kind of invective calls “attention to dominant cultural mores” (p. 7). Keeping our finger on the pulse of such attitudes is imperative to understand who is excluded from digital publics and how these exclusions perpetuate racism and sexism to “preserve the internet as a space free of politics and thus free of challenge to white masculine heterosexual hegemony” (Higgin, 2013, n.p.). While rhetoric and writing as a field has a long history of examining myriad exclusionary practices that occur in public discourses, we still have much work to do in understanding how online harassment, particularly that which is gendered, manifests in digital publics and to what rhetorical effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Women of Meghalaya and Kyriarchy
    Pramana Research Journal ISSN NO: 2249-2976 WOMEN OF MEGHALAYA AND KYRIARCHY Puspita Das1, Ayuta Mohanty2* 1Professor, College of Community Science, Central Agricultural University, Tura,Meghalaya. Email- [email protected] 2Lecturer in English, C.V. Raman College of Engineering, Bhubaneswar. Email- [email protected] ABSTRACT: The most common word that comes to our mind when we hear the word oppression is ‘patriarchy’. But one more term that is also associated with oppression is ‘Kyriarchy’. Coined in 1992, it tries to include the people who are privileged in one aspect and oppressed in another aspect. This pattern of being privileged and oppressed at the same time has attracted the critics to analyse such situation. Similar situation can be found in the state of Meghalaya. Meghalaya comprises of various tribes and is matrilineal and matrilocal in nature. So in a way, the women of Meghalaya are privileged than women across the country. But they are also oppressed by the men of their tribes. This combination of being both suppressed and privileged makes them an ideal example of ‘Kyriarchy’. This paper analyses the condition and situation of women of Meghalaya under the scanning lens of Kyriarchy. The privileges that they have has been analysed and the suppression that they suffer simultaneously has also been highlighted. KEYWORDS- Kyriarchy, Meghalaya, Women, Oppressed, Privileged INTRODUCTION: The word ‘Kyriarchy’ was coined by Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza in 1992 “to describe her theory of interconnected, interacting and self-extending systems of domination and submission, in which a single individual might be oppressed in some relationship and privileged in others”1.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Acting Like 13 Year Old Boys?'
    ‘Acting like 13 year old boys?’ Exploring the discourse of online harassment and the diversity of harassers Lucy Fisher-Hackworth Submitted to the Department of Gender Studies, University of Utrecht In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Erasmus Mundus Master's Degree in Women's and Gender Studies Main supervisor: Dr.Domitilla Olivieri (University of Utrecht) Second reader: Dr. Jasmina Lukic (Central European University) Utrecht, the Netherlands 2016 Approved: _________________________________________ 1 ABSTRACT In this thesis, I have undertaken research into the users behind online harassment. The impetus behind this was to investigate taken for granted assumptions about who harassers are, what they do online, and how they do it. To begin, I highlight the discourse of online harassment of women in scholarship and online-news media, discussing the assumptions made about who is harassing and why. I discuss the lack of consideration of multi-layered harassment and argue for more research that takes into consideration the intersectionality of harassing content, and the experiences of all women online. I provide an overview of online methodologies and of feminism on the internet. I then undertake an investigation into harassers behind online harassment of women, and find trends in user profiles, user behaviour, and in online communication patterns more broadly. I discuss how researching this topic affected me personally, reflecting on the impact of viewing high amounts abusive content. My findings challenged many of the assumptions initially identified, so, with that in mind, I provide a discussion of why such assumptions are problematic. I argue that such assumptions contribute to a discourse that homogenizes harassment and harassers, and overlooks broader internet-specific behaviours.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality: T E Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community
    #Intersectionality: T e Fourth Wave Feminist Twitter Community Intersectionality, is the marrow within the bones of fem- Tegan Zimmerman (PhD, Comparative Literature, inism. Without it, feminism will fracture even further – University of Alberta) is an Assistant Professor of En- Roxane Gay (2013) glish/Creative Writing and Women’s Studies at Stephens College in Columbia, Missouri. A recent Visiting Fel- This article analyzes the term “intersectional- low in the Centre for Contemporary Women’s Writing ity” as defined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw (1989, and the Institute of Modern Languages Research at the 1991) in relation to the digital turn and, in doing so, University of London, Zimmerman specializes in con- considers how this concept is being employed by fourth temporary women’s historical fiction and contempo- wave feminists on Twitter. Presently, little scholarship rary gender theory. Her book Matria Redux: Caribbean has been devoted to fourth wave feminism and its en- Women’s Historical Fiction, forthcoming from North- gagement with intersectionality; however, some notable western University Press, examines the concepts of ma- critics include Kira Cochrane, Michelle Goldberg, Mik- ternal history and maternal genealogy. ki Kendall, Ealasaid Munro, Lola Okolosie, and Roop- ika Risam.1 Intersectionality, with its consideration of Abstract class, race, age, ability, sexuality, and gender as inter- This article analyzes the term “intersectionality” as de- secting loci of discriminations or privileges, is now the fined by Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw in relation to the overriding principle among today’s feminists, manifest digital turn: it argues that intersectionality is the dom- by theorizing tweets and hashtags on Twitter. Because inant framework being employed by fourth wave fem- fourth wave feminism, more so than previous feminist inists and that is most apparent on social media, espe- movements, focuses on and takes up online technolo- cially on Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Feminism and Radical Planning
    PLT0010.1177/1473095218763221Planning TheoryJacobs 763221research-article2018 Article Planning Theory 2019, Vol. 18(1) 24 –39 Black feminism and radical © The Author(s) 2018 Article reuse guidelines: planning: New directions for sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218763221DOI: 10.1177/1473095218763221 disaster planning research journals.sagepub.com/home/plt Fayola Jacobs Texas A&M University, USA Abstract After Hurricane Katrina’s devastation of the United States’ Gulf Coast, conversations about flooding became focused on the interconnections between so-called “natural” disasters, poverty, gender and race. Although research has long shown that women, people of color and low- income communities are more vulnerable to natural hazards, the disproportionate effects of Hurricane Katrina and subsequent federal and state disaster response efforts forced the national spotlight on the institutional and systemic nature of racism, classism and sexism. Using Black feminism and radical planning theory, two lenses that provides a comprehensive framework for understanding racism, classism and sexism, this article examines the concept and literature of social vulnerability. I argue while social vulnerability research has made significant contributions to planners’ understandings of disasters and inequity, it fails to center community knowledge, identify intersectional oppressions and name them as such and encourage community activism, all of which are keys to making meaningful change. Keywords Black feminism, disasters, environmental justice, feminism, social vulnerability, urban planning In the wake of Hurricane Katrina’s devastation and the images that emerged from the Gulf Coast in general and New Orleans in particular, the nation began to pay attention to the inequitable impacts of disasters on poor communities and communities of color.
    [Show full text]
  • Eszter Babarczy: Community Based Trust on the Internet
    PTE BTK Nyelvtudományi Doktori Iskola Kommunikáció Doktori Program Babarczy Eszter: Community Based Trust on the Internet Doktori értekezés Témavezető: Horányi Özséb egyetemi tanár 2011. 1 Community-based trust on the internet Tartalom Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. A very brief history of the internet ........................................................................................................... 9 Early Days ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Mainstream internet .............................................................................................................................. 12 The internet of social software .............................................................................................................. 15 III Early trust related problems and solutions ............................................................................................ 20 Trading .................................................................................................................................................... 20 Risks of and trust in content ....................................................................................................................... 22 UGC and its discontents: Wikipedia ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]