Neutron Scattering

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neutron Scattering Neutron Scattering Basic properties of neutron and electron neutron electron −27 −31 mass mkn =×1.675 10 g mke =×9.109 10 g charge 0 e spin s = ½ s = ½ −e= −e= magnetic dipole moment µnn= gs with gn = 3.826 µee= gs with ge = 2.0 2mn 2me =22k 2π =22k Ek== E = 2m λ 2m energy n e 81.81 150.26 Em[]eV = 2 Ee[]V = 2 λ ⎣⎡Å⎦⎤ λ ⎣⎦⎡⎤Å interaction with matter: Coulomb interaction — 9 strong-force interaction 9 — magnetic dipole-dipole 9 9 interaction Several salient features are apparent from this table: – electrons are charged and experience strong, long-range Coulomb interactions in a solid. They therefore typically only penetrate a few atomic layers into the solid. Electron scattering is therefore a surface-sensitive probe. Neutrons are uncharged and do not experience Coulomb interaction. The strong-force interaction is naturally strong but very short-range, and the magnetic interaction is long-range but weak. Neutrons therefore penetrate deeply into most materials, so that neutron scattering is a bulk probe. – Electrons with wavelengths comparable to interatomic distances (λ ~2Å ) have energies of several tens of electron volts, comparable to energies of plasmons and interband transitions in solids. Electron scattering is therefore well suited as a probe of these high-energy excitations. Neutrons with λ ~2Å have energies of several tens of meV , comparable to the thermal energies kTB at room temperature. These so-called “thermal neutrons” are excellent probes of low-energy excitations such as lattice vibrations and spin waves with energies in the meV range. Basic idea of neutron scattering experiment: K K K K neutron Qk=−fik kii,ω incoming neutron source K = 22 q , ω excitation ωω=−fiω= ()kkf−i 2mn K neutron k ,ω scattered neutron ω = 0 elastic scattering detector ff ω ≠ 0 inelastic scattering – 1 – Neutron sources Research reactor 235Un+→A+B+2.3n (A, B: fission fragments) ⇒ chain reaction, keeps going by itself until "fuel" (uranium enriched by 235U ) is exhausted ⇒ source of both energy (nuclear power reactors) and neutrons (research reactors) research reactors optimized for neutron flux ⇒ low power fission reaction most favorable for thermal neutrons ⇒ fast neutrons slowed down by "moderator" ( HO22, DO) neutron Maxwellian profile flux ~30meV energy Research reactor FRM-II in Munich, Germany Outside view of the building (left) and layout of the experimental hall (right). The neutron beam tubes (blue) tap into the flux emitted from the reactor core (center) and guide the neutrons to various neutron scattering instruments. http:///www.frm2.tu-muenchen.de – 2 – Spallation source p + Hg → A + B + xn Fragmentation of target atoms induced by high energy proton beam from accelerator. Typical energy of spallation neutrons >> thermal energy ⇒ need to use moderator for scattering experiments. Magnetism and Crystal Analyzer Chopper Spectrometer Microvolt Liquids Spectrometer Reflectometers Disordered Materials Instrument 100-Micr ovolt Spectrometer SANS Instrument Engineering Diffractometer Single Crystal Powder Diffractometer Diffractometer Layout of the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) at Oak Ridge National Lab (USA) Protons are accelerated in the linear accelerator, and various neutron scattering instruments are grouped around the target, where the neutrons are produced in a spallation reaction. http://www.sns.gov – 3 – Neutron detectors Since neutrons are electrically neutral, they are difficult to detect directly. One therefore converts them into charged particles via a nuclear reaction such as: nH+→33e H+p The protons are collected by a high electric field and converted into electric current. 10 10 Another type of neutron detector is based on a gas of BF3. B has a high neutron capture cross section via the nuclear reaction nB+→10 7 Li+4He. The energetic nuclei produced in this reaction ionize gas molecules, which are again collected by a high electric field. Interaction of neutrons with matter elastic scattering inelastic scattering strong-force interaction position of nuclei in solid lattice vibrations (“nuclear scattering”) (lattice structure) (phonons) magnetic interaction position and orientation of spin excitations electronic magnetic moments (magnons, spin waves) in solids (ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism) Elastic nuclear scattering dσ basic quantity: differential cross-section dΩ detector ∆Ω solid angle element covered by detector # of neutrons incident neutron beam, flux φ = area ⋅ time dσ = # of neutrons scattered into solid angle element dΩ per unit time, dΩ normalized to incident flux. Material-specific quantity, experimental conditions (size of detector, incident flux) normalized out. ⎡⎤dσ 1 dimensions: == area ⎣⎦⎢⎥dtΩ∆[]Ω[][φ] dimensionless – 4 – dσ calculation of through Fermi's Golden Rule: dΩ 2π KK2 transition rate ()# of transitions per unit time : Wk= Vkρ ()E = fi f Density of final states K K 1 ik ⋅r ⎫ | kei i = ⎪ L3 ⎪ plane waves, normalized to sample size L K K ⎬ 1 ik ⋅r f ⎪ | kef = L3 ⎭⎪ 3 K ⎛⎞L dk f ρ f ()E = ⎜⎟ ⎝⎠N2π dE density of states in k-space K 2 dk ff=Ωk dk fd 33 2 ⎛⎞LL2 dk fn⎛⎞m k fdE= k f ρ ff()Ek=Ω⎜⎟ d=⎜⎟ 2 dΩwith = ⎝⎠22ππdE ⎝⎠= dk fnm velocity =k incident neutron flux: = i 33 LmnL kkif= for elastic scattering 2 KK 2 K dWσ ⎛⎞mn ik()if−⋅k r K ⇒= =⎜⎟Ve dr dΩ incident flux ⎝⎠2π =2 ∫ 2 K K 2 ⎛⎞mn KK−⋅iQ r = ⎜⎟Vr()e dr "Born approximation" ⎝⎠2π =2 ∫ For short range strong force, use approximate interaction potential KK2π =2 K Vr()=−bδ ()r R m n position of nucleus "scattering length" b depends on the details of the nuclear structure and varies greatly (and almost randomly if you don’t know a lot about nuclear physics) among elements/isotopes. A table of scattering lengths can be found on the web under http://www.ncnr.nist.gov/resources/n-lengths/ dσ 2 for single nucleus: = b dΩ dσ total cross section: σ =Ωdb=4π 2 ∫ dΩ – 5 – KK2π =2 K G lattice of nuclei: Vr=−bK δ r R b K : scattering length of nucleus at lattice site R () ∑K R ()R mn R 2 K K dσ KKK iQ⋅r =−∫ dr ∑bR δ ()r R e dΩ R K K 2 iQ⋅R = ∑beR R K For most Q , matrix elements are very small because phase factors contributed K K by different nuclei cancel out. Matrix element is large only for Q= K (reciprocal KK lattice vector, defined as eiK⋅R =1). If this condition is satisfied, the constructive interference leads to a huge enhancement (“Bragg peak”) of the scattering rate. K K 2 3 iQ⋅k ()2π K K Use relation eN=δ Q−K derived on problem set. ∑K∑K() kkv0 reciprocal lattice vector volume of unit cell total # of unit cells If all nuclei are identical: 3 dσ N ()2π K K =−bQ2 δ K ∑K () dvΩ o K K for unit cell with several atoms, basis vector d 3 dσ ()2π K KK2 =−NQδ ()KFN ()K dvΩ ∑K 0 K K K K FK= eiQ⋅dbK “nuclear structure factor” N ()∑K d d Relationship between reciprocal lattice vector and scattering angle Θ at Bragg peak: K K Kn12π λ sin Θ= = ⇒ 2dnsin Θ= λ “Bragg's law” 22kd2π K K k Θ k i f n = integer d = lattice constant Collect intensities of all Bragg reflections ⇒ determine lattice structure (crystallography). – 6 – This calculation is strictly valid only for a single isotope with nuclear spin I = 0 . However, almost all elements are found naturally with a distribution of isotopes, most of which have I ≠ 0 . The scattering length b depends on details of the nuclear structure and can vary strongly from one isotope to the other. It also depends on the combined spin of the nucleus and the neutron which can take the values I +½ or I −½ . The nuclear spins are randomly oriented in a solid, except at extremely low temperatures. For a given isotope, one therefore has to average over the scattering lengths b+ for I +½ and b− for I −½ ; e.g. for hydrogen ( I = ½ ) bf+ =10.85 m and b− = −47.50 fm, and for deuterium ( I =1) bf+ = 9.53 m and bf− = 0.98 m. The number of states for these two situations is: 2½()II+=2+2 for I+½ 2½()II−=2 for I−½ Further, the different naturally occurring isotopes of each element are incorporated randomly in a solid, with no correlations between different lattice positions. Taking these complications into account, the differential cross section for elastic nuclear neutron scattering from a solid containing a single element per unit cell becomes K K 2 K K JJK dσ iQ⋅R iQ⋅−()R R′ ==beK bbKJJK e ∑K r ∑KJJK R R′ dΩ R RR′ where ... denotes the average over isotopes and nuclear spin states. Since there are no correlations between b-values for different nuclei, we have 2 ⎡⎤22II+ 2 K JJK KJJK ξξ+− ′ bbR R′ ==b ∑cξξ⎢⎥b+ bξ for R=R ξ ⎣⎦⎢⎥42IIξξ++42 ⎡⎤22II+ 222 K JJK KJJK 2 ξξ+− ′ bbR R′ ==b ∑cξξ⎢⎥()b + ()bξ for R≠R ξ ⎣⎦⎢⎥42IIξξ++42 where ... denotes the different naturally occurring isotopes and cξ their relative abundance. Splitting the sum into two terms, we have K K JJK dσ 2 iQ⋅−()R R′ 2 =+be b K∑∑JJK K dΩ RRK, JJ′K R RR≠ ′ K K JJK 22iQ⋅−()R R′ 2 =+be ⎡⎤b−b K∑∑JJK K RR, ′ R ⎣⎦ where b 2 has been added to the first term and subtracted from the second ∑K R K JJK term in the sum. With the restriction R ≠ R′ thus removed, the first term is identical to the result obtained above for the case of a single element per unit cell, except that b2 was replaced by b 2 . – 7 – 3 dσ ()2π 22K K Therefore =−Nb∑δ ()QK+N⎡ b2 −b⎤ dVΩ K ⎣ ⎦ 0 K "coherent" scattering "incoherent" scattering Again, the chemical properties of the elements are dictated entirely by the number of protons and electrons and completely independent of the number of neutrons per nucleus (isotope) or the nuclear spin.
Recommended publications
  • Measurements of Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering at Large Momentum Transfer*
    SLAC-PUB-4395 Rev. January 1993 m Measurements of Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering at Large Momentum Transfer* A. F. SILL,(~) R. G. ARNOLD,P. E. BOSTED,~. C. CHANG,@) J. GoMEz,(~)A. T. KATRAMATOU,C. J. MARTOFF, G. G. PETRATOS,(~)A. A. RAHBAR,S. E. ROCK,AND Z. M. SZALATA Department of Physics The American University, Washington DC 20016 D.J. SHERDEN Stanford Linear Accelerator Center , Stanford University, Stanford, California 94309 J. M. LAMBERT Department of Physics Georgetown University, Washington DC 20057 and R. M. LOMBARD-NELSEN De’partemente de Physique Nucle’aire CEN Saclay, Gif-sur- Yvette, 91191 Cedex, France Submitted to Physical Review D *Work supported by US Department of Energy contract DE-AC03-76SF00515 (SLAC), and National Science Foundation Grants PHY83-40337 and PHY85-10549 (American University). R. M. Lombard-Nelsen was supported by C. N. R. S. (French National Center for Scientific Research). Javier Gomez was partially supported by CONICIT, Venezuela. (‘)Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, NY 14627. (*)Permanent address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. (C)Present address: Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA 23606. (d)Present address: Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122. (c)Present address: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford CA 94309. ABSTRACT Measurements of the forward-angle differential cross section for elastic electron-proton scattering were made in the range of momentum transfer from Q2 = 2.9 to 31.3 (GeV/c)2 using an electron beam at the Stanford Linear Accel- erator Center. The data span six orders of magnitude in cross section.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Neutron Scattering Technique Using Triple-Axis
    1 High -resolution neutron scattering technique using triple-axis spectrometers ¢ ¡ ¡ GUANGYONG XU, ¡ * P. M. GEHRING, V. J. GHOSH AND G. SHIRANE ¢ ¡ Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, and NCNR, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 0 XXXXXXX 0000; accepted 0 XXXXXXX 0000) Abstract We present a new technique which brings a substantial increase of the wave-vector £ - resolution of triple-axis-spectrometers by matching the measurement wave-vector £ to the ¥§¦©¨ reflection ¤ of a perfect crystal analyzer. A relative Bragg width of can be ¡ achieved with reasonable collimation settings. This technique is very useful in measuring small structural changes and line broadenings that can not be accurately measured with con- ventional set-ups, while still keeping all the strengths of a triple-axis-spectrometer. 1. Introduction Triple-axis-spectrometers (TAS) are widely used in both elastic and inelastic neutron scat- tering measurements to study the structures and dynamics in condensed matter. It has the £ flexibility to allow one to probe nearly all coordinates in energy ( ) and momentum ( ) space in a controlled manner, and the data can be easily interpreted (Bacon, 1975; Shirane et al., 2002). The resolution of a triple-axis-spectrometer is determined by many factors, including the ¨ incident (E ) and final (E ) neutron energies, the wave-vector transfer , the monochromator PREPRINT: Acta Crystallographica Section A A Journal of the International Union of Crystallography 2 and analyzer mosaic, and the beam collimations, etc. This has been studied in detail by Cooper & Nathans (1967), Werner & Pynn (1971) and Chesser & Axe (1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Scattering
    Neutron Scattering John R.D. Copley Summer School on Methods and Applications of High Resolution Neutron Spectroscopy and Small Angle Neutron Scattering NIST Center for NeutronNCNR Summer Research, School 2011 June 12-16, 2011 Acknowledgements National Science Foundation NIST Center for Neutron (grant # DMR-0944772) Research (NCNR) Center for High Resolution Neutron Scattering (CHRNS) 2 NCNR Summer School 2011 (Slow) neutron interactions Scattering plus Absorption Total =+Elastic Inelastic scattering scattering scattering (diffraction) (spectroscopy) includes “Quasielastic neutron Structure Dynamics scattering” (QENS) NCNR Summer School 2011 3 Total, elastic, and inelastic scattering Incident energy Ei E= Ei -Ef Scattered energy Ef (“energy transfer”) Total scattering: Elastic scattering: E = E (i.e., E = 0) all Ef (i.e., all E) f i Inelastic scattering: E ≠ E (i.e., E ≠ 0) D f i A M M Ef Ei S Ei D S Diffractometer Spectrometer (Some write E = Ef –Ei) NCNR Summer School 2011 4 Kinematics mv= = k 1 222 Emvk2m==2 = Scattered wave (m is neutron’s mass) vector k , energy E 2θ f f Incident wave vector ki, energy Ei N.B. The symbol for scattering angle in Q is wave vector transfer, SANS experiments is or “scattering vector” Q =Q is momentum transfer θ, not 2θ. Q = ki - kf (For x-rays, Eck = = ) (“wave vector transfer”) NCNR Summer School 2011 5 Elastic scattering Q = ki - kf G In real space k In reciprocal space f G G G kf Q ki 2θ 2θ G G k Q i E== 0 kif k Q =θ 2k i sin NCNR Summer School 2011 6 Total scattering, inelastic scattering Q = ki - kf G kf G Q Qkk2kkcos2222= +− θ 2θ G if if ki At fixed scattering angle 2θ, the magnitude (and the direction) of Q varies with the energy transfer E.
    [Show full text]
  • Compton Sources of Electromagnetic Radiation∗
    August 25, 2010 13:33 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE RAST˙Compton Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology Vol. 1 (2008) 1–16 c World Scientific Publishing Company COMPTON SOURCES OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION∗ GEOFFREY KRAFFT Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators, Jefferson Laboratory, 12050 Jefferson Ave. Newport News, Virginia 23606, United States of America kraff[email protected] GERD PRIEBE Division Leader High Field Laboratory, Max-Born-Institute, Max-Born-Straße 2 A Berlin, 12489, Germany [email protected] When a relativistic electron beam interacts with a high-field laser beam, the beam electrons can radiate intense and highly collimated electromagnetic radiation through Compton scattering. Through relativistic upshifting and the relativistic Doppler effect, highly energetic polarized photons are radiated along the electron beam motion when the electrons interact with the laser light. For example, X-ray radiation can be obtained when optical lasers are scattered from electrons of tens of MeV beam energy. Because of the desirable properties of the radiation produced, many groups around the world have been designing, building, and utilizing Compton sources for a wide variety of purposes. In this review paper, we discuss the generation and properties of the scattered radiation, the types of Compton source devices that have been constructed to present, and the future prospects of radiation sources of this general type. Due to the possibilities to produce hard electromagnetic radiation in a device small compared to the alternative storage ring sources, it is foreseen that large numbers of such sources may be constructed in the future. Keywords: Compton backscattering, Inverse Compton source, Thomson scattering, X-rays, Spectral brilliance 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Spallation Neutron Sources for Science and Technology
    Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Nuclear and Particle Physics, 20-24 Nov. 2011, Hurghada, Egypt SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCES FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY M.N.H. Comsan Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt Spallation Neutron Facilities Increasing interest has been noticed in spallation neutron sources (SNS) during the past 20 years. The system includes high current proton accelerator in the GeV region and spallation heavy metal target in the Hg-Bi region. Among high flux currently operating SNSs are: ISIS in UK (1985), SINQ in Switzerland (1996), JSNS in Japan (2008), and SNS in USA (2010). Under construction is the European spallation source (ESS) in Sweden (to be operational in 2020). The intense neutron beams provided by SNSs have the advantage of being of non-reactor origin, are of continuous (SINQ) or pulsed nature. Combined with state-of-the-art neutron instrumentation, they have a diverse potential for both scientific research and diverse applications. Why Neutrons? Neutrons have wavelengths comparable to interatomic spacings (1-5 Å) Neutrons have energies comparable to structural and magnetic excitations (1-100 meV) Neutrons are deeply penetrating (bulk samples can be studied) Neutrons are scattered with a strength that varies from element to element (and isotope to isotope) Neutrons have a magnetic moment (study of magnetic materials) Neutrons interact only weakly with matter (theory is easy) Neutron scattering is therefore an ideal probe of magnetic and atomic structures and excitations Neutron Producing Reactions
    [Show full text]
  • Single Crystal Diffuse Neutron Scattering
    Review Single Crystal Diffuse Neutron Scattering Richard Welberry 1,* ID and Ross Whitfield 2 ID 1 Research School of Chemistry, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia 2 Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA; whitfi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-6125-4122 Received: 30 November 2017; Accepted: 8 January 2018; Published: 11 January 2018 Abstract: Diffuse neutron scattering has become a valuable tool for investigating local structure in materials ranging from organic molecular crystals containing only light atoms to piezo-ceramics that frequently contain heavy elements. Although neutron sources will never be able to compete with X-rays in terms of the available flux the special properties of neutrons, viz. the ability to explore inelastic scattering events, the fact that scattering lengths do not vary systematically with atomic number and their ability to scatter from magnetic moments, provides strong motivation for developing neutron diffuse scattering methods. In this paper, we compare three different instruments that have been used by us to collect neutron diffuse scattering data. Two of these are on a spallation source and one on a reactor source. Keywords: single crystal; diffuse scattering; neutrons; spallation source; time-of-flight 1. Introduction Bragg scattering, which is used in conventional crystallography, gives only information about the average crystal structure. Diffuse scattering from single crystals, on the other hand, is a prime source of local structural information. There is now a wealth of evidence to show that the more local structure is investigated the more we are obliged to reassess our understanding of crystalline structure and behaviour [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Neutron Scattering
    Part I Basics of neutron scattering 13 Chapter 1 Introduction to neutron scattering Neutron scattering is one of the most powerful and versatile experimental meth- ods to study the structure and dynamics of materials on the atomic and nanome- ter scale. Quoting the Nobel committee, when awarding the prize to C. Shull and B. Brockhouse in 1994, these pioneers have “helped answer the question of where atoms are and ... the question of what atoms do” [4]. Neutron scattering is presently used by more than 5000 researchers world- wide, and the scope of the method is continuously broadening. In the 1950’ies and 1960’ies, neutron scattering was an exotic tool in Solid State Physics and Chemical Crystallography, but today it serves communities as diverse as Biol- ogy, Earth Sciences, Planetary Science, Engineering, Polymer Chemistry, and Cultural Heritage. In brief, neutrons are used in all scientific fields that deal with hard, soft, or biological materials. It is, however, appropriate to issue a warning already here. Although neu- tron scattering is a great technique, it is also time-consuming and expensive. Neutron scattering experiments last from hours to days and are performed at large international facilities. Here, the running costs correspond to several thou- sand Euros per instrument day. Hence, neutron scattering should be used only where other methods are inadequate. For the study of atomic and nanometer-scale structure in materials, X-ray scattering is the technique of choice. X-ray sources are by far more abundant and are, especially for synchrotron X-ray sources, much stronger than neutron sources. Hence, the rule of thumb goes: “If an experiment can be performed with X-rays, use X-rays”.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges in Neutron Crystallography
    EPJ Web of Conferences 236, 02001 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202023602001 JDN 24 Opportunities and challenges in neutron crystallography Nathan Richard Zaccai1,*, and Nicolas Coquelle2,† 1CIMR, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom 2Institut Laue Langevin, 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9, France Abstract. Neutron and X-ray crystallography are complementary to each other. While X-ray scattering is directly proportional to the number of electrons of an atom, neutrons interact with the atomic nuclei themselves. Neutron crystallography therefore provides an excellent alternative in determining the positions of hydrogens in a biological molecule. In particular, since highly polarized hydrogen atoms (H+) do not have electrons, they cannot be observed by X-rays. Neutron crystallography has its own limitations, mainly due to inherent low flux of neutrons sources, and as a consequence, the need for much larger crystals and for different data collection and analysis strategies. These technical challenges can however be overcome to yield crucial structural insights about protonation states in enzyme catalysis, ligand recognition, as well as the presence of unusual hydrogen bonds in proteins. 1 Introduction Although X-ray crystallography has become the workhorse of structural biology, Neutron crystallography has several advantages to offer in the structural analysis of biological molecules. X-rays and neutrons interact differently with matter in general, and with biological macromolecules in particular. These two crystallography approaches are therefore complementary to each other [1]. While X-ray scattering is directly proportional to the number of electrons of an atom, neutrons interact with the atomic nuclei themselves. In this perspective, hydrogen atoms, which represent ~50% of the atomistic composition of proteins and DNA, are hardly visible using X-ray crystallography, while they can be observed in nuclear density maps derived from neutron diffraction data even at moderate resolution (2.5Å and higher).
    [Show full text]
  • Triple-Axis Spectroscopy
    Triple-Axis Spectroscopy Seung-Hun Lee Outline • Basic principles of TAS • Multiplexing detection modes for TAS 1. Horizontally focusing mode 2. Position-sensitive-detector (PSD) mode • Examples of science utilizing the PSD mode Mn12 : Magnetic Molecule ZnCr2O4 : Geometrically Frustrated Magnet 1. 1. ω h 1. 0. 12345 T( Neutron Scattering Sample ? Incident neutrons Scattered neutrons measures scattering cross section as a function of Q and ω 2 d σ (Q,ω) dΩdω Neutron Scattering Correlation Function Cross Section 2 Fourier Transform d σ < S (t) S (0) > dΩdω R R Ordered moment Fluctuating moment 0 Γ ~ h/τ 0 Time ω Long range order Short range order κ ~ 1/ξ Q R-R Γ : relaxation time τ : lifetime κ : intrinsic linewidth ξ : correlation length How can we determine Q and ω ? Scattering triangle : Energy and momentum are conserved in the scattering process Now, how to determine ki, kf, and 2θ ? • Triple-axis spectroscopy (TAS) • Time-of-flight spectroscopy (TOF) Conventional Triple-Axis Spectroscopy (TAS) A single point at a time Sample Single Detector Neutron Source Analyzer Monochromator TAS is ideally suited for probing small regions of phase space Shortcoming: Low data collection rate Improvement Multicrystal analyzer and position-sensitive detector Horizontally Focusing (HF) Analyzer Mode Sample Relaxed Q-resolution Monochromator Single Detector ∆2θ Multicrystal Analyzer L = distance from sample to HF analyzer wa = total width of HF analyzer ∆2θ =wa sinθa/L ~ 9 degree for Ef=5 meV at SPINS Useful for studying systems with short-range correlations
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Neutron Scattering
    Introduction to Neutron Spectroscopy John R.D. Copley Summer School on the Fundamentals of Neutron Scattering NIST Center for Neutron Research, June 8-12, 2015 NCNR Summer School, 2015 Neutron scattering Neutron scattering is an experimental technique that is used to reveal information about the structure and dynamics of materials. When a neutron strikes a material object and leaves in a new direction it is said to have been scattered. Its momentum is changed and there may also be a change in its kinetic energy. In a neutron scattering experiment a sample is placed in a beam from a neutron source, and some of the scattered neutrons are counted. NCNR Summer School, 2015 Neutron scattering There are two main types of neutron scattering experiments. (1) Neutron diffraction experiments, Ei is incident energy which give structural information, Ef is scattered energy e.g. D M (2) Neutron spectroscopy experiments, which give dynamical information, e.g. Ei A S Ef M: monochromator M S: sample D: detector Ei D S A: analyzer NCNR Summer School, 2015 Recognition Clifford G. Shull Bertram N. Brockhouse (Neutron Diffraction) (Neutron Spectroscopy) The importance of these techniques was recognized by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences who in 1994 awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics to two scientists “for pioneering contributions to the development of neutron scattering techniques for studies of condensed matter”. The Prize was shared between Professor Clifford G. Shull of MIT, “for the development of the neutron diffraction technique”, and Professor Bertram N. Brockhouse of McMaster University (Canada), “for the development of neutron spectroscopy”.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-85-96 DOE's Physics Accelerators
    DOE’s Physics Accelerators: Their Costs And Benefits This report provides an inventory of the Department of Energy’s existing and planned high-energy physics and nuclear physics accelerator facilities, identifies their as- sociated costs, and presents information on the benefits being derived from their construction and operation. These facilities are the primary tools used by high-energy and nuclear physicists to learn more about what energy and matter consist of and how their component parts or particles are influenced by the most basic natural forces. Of DOE’s $728 million budget for high-energy physics and nuclear physics during fiscal year 1985, about $372.1 million is earmarked for operating 14 DOE-supported accelerator facilities coast-to-coast. DOE’s investment in these facilities amounts to about $1.2 billion. If DOE’s current plans for adding new facilities are carried out, this investment could grow by about $4.3 billion through fiscal year 1994. Annual facility operating costs wilt also grow by about $230 million, or an increase of about 60 percent over current costs. The primary benefits gained from DOE’s investment in these facilities are new scientific knowledge and the education and training of future physicists. Accor- ding to DOE and accelerator facility officials, accelerator particle beams are also used in other scientific applications and have some medical and industrial applications. GAOIRCED-85-96 B APRIL 1,198s 031763 UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548 RESOURCES, COMMUNlfY, \ND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIV ISlON B-217863 The Honorable J. Bennett Johnston Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Committee on Appropriations United States Senate Dear Senator Johnston: This report responds to your request dated November 25, 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
    Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy Peter Fouquet [email protected] Institut Laue-Langevin Grenoble, France September 2014 Hercules Specialized Course 17 - Grenoble What you are supposed to learn in this lecture 1. The length and time scales that can be studied using NSE spectroscopy 2. The measurement principle of NSE spectroscopy 3. Discrimination techniques for coherent, incoherent and magnetic dynamics 4. To which scientific problems can I apply NSE spectroscopy? The measurement principle of neutron spin echo spectroscopy (quantum mechanical model) The neutron wave function is split by magnetic fields magnetic coil 1 magnetic coil 2 polarised sample The 2 wave packets arrive at neutron the sample with a time difference t If the molecules move between the arrival of the first and second wave packet then coherence is lost t λ3 Bdl The intermediate ∝ scattering function I(Q,t) reflects this loss in coherence strong wavelength field integral dependence The measurement principle of neutron spin echo spectroscopy Dynamic Scattering NSE spectra for diffusive motion Function S(Q,ω) G(R,ω) I(Q,t) = e-t/τ Fourier Transforms temperature up ⇒ τ down Intermediate VanHove Correlation Scattering Function Function I(Q,t) G(R,t) Measured with Neutron Spin Echo (NSE) Spectroscopy Neutron spin echo spectroscopy in the time/space landscape NSE is the neutron spectroscopy with the highest energy resolution The time range covered is 1 ps < t < 1 µs (equivalent to neV energy resolution) The momentum transfer range is 0.01 < Q < 4 Å-1 Spin Echo The measurement principle
    [Show full text]