DOCSLIB.ORG

Sydney Metro West – Stage 1, Technical Paper 10: Biodiversity Development Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sydney Metro West – Stage 1, Technical Paper 10: Biodiversity Development Assessment Report West Westmead to The Bays and Sydney CBD Environmental Impact Statement Concept and Stage 1 Technical Paper 10 Biodiversity development assessment report Sydney Metro West – Stage 1 Technical Paper 10: Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Final Sydney Metro Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Sydney Metro Sydney Metro West – Stage 1 Project No: IA199800 Document Title: Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Revision: Final Date: April 2020 Client Name: Sydney Metro Project Manager: Katrina Smallwood Author: Lukas Clews Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 7, 177 Pacific Highway North Sydney NSW 2060 Australia PO Box 632 North Sydney NSW 2059 Australia T +61 2 9928 2100 F +61 2 9928 2444 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2020 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Sydney Metro West – Stage 1 Technical Paper 10: Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Contents Glossary of terms ............................................................................................................................................................................ i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... v 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Sydney Metro West ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and scope of this report ............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Key terms used in this report .................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Authors ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2. Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Study area ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Background research and data sources ................................................................................................................................ 6 2.3 Mapping extent of native vegetation cover ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Plant community type identification ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Patch size ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.6 Threatened species habitat assessment – creating a candidate species list ......................................................... 12 2.7 Targeted threatened species surveys.................................................................................................................................. 13 2.8 Survey limitations ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3. Landscape features ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1 IBRA Bioregions and sub-regions ......................................................................................................................................... 16 3.2 BioNet NSW Landscapes .......................................................................................................................................................... 16 3.3 Rivers, streams and estuaries ................................................................................................................................................. 16 3.4 Wetlands ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 3.5 Connectivity of habitat ............................................................................................................................................................. 32 3.6 Areas of geological significance and soil hazard features ........................................................................................... 32 3.7 Areas of outstanding biodiversity value ............................................................................................................................. 32 3.8 Native vegetation extent ......................................................................................................................................................... 32 4. Native vegetation and vegetation integrity ........................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Description by site ..................................................................................................................................................................... 34 4.2 Plant community type descriptions ..................................................................................................................................... 41 4.3 Vegetation zones and vegetation integrity score ........................................................................................................... 49 4.4 Patch size ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 4.5 Threatened ecological communities ................................................................................................................................... 49 4.6 Groundwater dependent ecosystems ................................................................................................................................. 50 5. Habitat suitability for threatened species .............................................................................................................. 65 5.1 Habitat suitability for species that can be predicted by habitat surrogates (ecosystem credit species) ..... 65 5.2 Habitat suitability for species that cannot be predicted by habitat surrogates (species credit species) ..... 69 5.3 Threatened species survey results ....................................................................................................................................... 76 Sydney Metro West – Stage 1 Technical Paper 10: Biodiversity Development Assessment Report 6. Aquatic assessment ...................................................................................................................................................... 79 6.1 Existing environment ................................................................................................................................................................ 79 6.2 Sensitive receiving environments ......................................................................................................................................... 86 6.3 Marine vegetation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 88 6.4 Aquatic biota................................................................................................................................................................................ 89 6.5 Threatened fish ........................................................................................................................................................................... 89 7. Matters of National Environmental Significance .................................................................................................. 95 7.1 Wetlands of international and national importance ...................................................................................................... 95 7.2 Nationally listed threatened ecological communities .................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 109. M4-M5 EIS Vol 2I App T Groundwater Part 1
    M4-M5 Link Environmental Impact Statement August 2017 Appendix T Volume 2I Since finalisation of the Environmental Impact Statement, the project has been declared by Ministerial Order to be State significant infrastructure and critical State significant infrastructure under sections 115U (4) and 115V of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The Ministerial Order also amended Schedule 5 of State Environmental Planning Policy (State and Regional Development) 2011. The project remains subject to assessment under Part 5.1 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and requires the approval of the Minister for Planning. WestConnex speaks your language Greek Learn more by visiting µ www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage to watch project videos in your language and read more about WestConnex. If you need an interpreter, call the Translating WestConnex. µ , µ 131 450. and Interpreting Service on 131 450. Italian Arabic Per saperne di più visiti il sito www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage, dove potrà guardare i video del progetto in lingua italiana e trovare maggiori informazioni su WestConnex. Se ha bisogno di un interprete, contatti il Servizio di Traduzione ed Interpretariato (Translating ł ł .131 450 and Interpreting Service) al numero 131 450. Chinese Korean 了解詳情請上網 www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage 를 방문하여한국어로 www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage觀看(普通話) 된 프로젝트 비디오를 보고 WestConnex 에 관해 읽고 배우세요. 視頻, 並 查閱有關WestConnex的更多訊息。如需要傳譯員請 통역이 필요하시면 번역 및 통역 서비스 131 450 (TIS) 으로 전화 。。 撥電話傳譯服務 131 450 하십시오. Hindi Vietnamese : Hãy tìm hi u thêm và vi ng trang m ng www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage ( ) www.westconnex.com.au/yourlanguage xem phim nh b ng Vi t ng v công trình này và c thêm v WestConnex.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) in the Integrated Control of Acacia Species in South Africa
    Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 919 4-14 July 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Neal R. Spencer [ed.]. pp. 919-929 (2000) The Potential Role of Bruchophagus acaciae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) in the Integrated Control of Acacia Species in South Africa R. L. HILL1, A. J. GORDON2, and S. NESER3 1Richard Hill & Associates, Private Bag 4704, Christchurch, New Zealand 2Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X5017, Stellenbosch, 7599 South Africa 3Plant Protection Research Institute, Private Bag X134, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa Abstract Australian acacias invade watersheds and riverbeds in South Africa, reducing water flows and threatening environmental and economic values. Acacia mearnsii is the most widespread and important weed but also forms the basis of an important industry. A. dealbata, and to a lesser extent A. decurrens are also problems. All belong to the Section Botrycephalae of the sub-genus Heterophyllum. Short term control is achieved locally by removing plants, and by using herbicides, but seed-feeding control agents may provide an acceptable solution in the long term. Larvae of Bruchophagus acaciae (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) develop in the seeds of acacias. It was described from New Zealand, but is an Australian species. We explore whether B. acaciae has a role as a con- trol agent for acacias in South Africa. Seed was collected from 28 Australian species of Acacia growing in New Zealand. Attack was restricted to four of the seven species with- in the Section Botrycephalae, and two cases of attack on Acacia rubida (Section Phyllodineae; n=9). Apart from a wasp reared from one seed, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Briefs: the Fig—Ficus Carica L
    Close Encounters With the Environment Botanical Briefs: The Fig—Ficus carica L. Thomas W. McGovern, MD Clinical Importance Figs can cause irritant reactions with erythema, ulceration, or bullae; phototoxic reactions with bullae and hyperpigmentation sometimes followed by depigmentation and keloids; and chronic eczema with paronychia.1 These dermatoses occur in those who cultivate, gather, pack, or consume figs. The ability of fig plant extracts to stimulate pigmentation in vitiligo patients has been known for almost 2000 years,1 and in India fig extracts are used to treat eczema and psoriasis.2 In addition, the latex has been used as a treatment for warts.3 Family The family Moraceae (the mulberry family) contains 53 genera with about 1400 species, approximately 800 of which are in the genus Ficus. Family members include trees, shrubs, lianes, and herbs that usually have lacticifers with a milky latex.3 Distribution of Plant Ficus carica is probably a native of southwest Asia that rapidly spread to the Mediterranean region, where it was cultivated in Egypt at least 6000 years ago. Today the fig is cultivated mainly in temperate climates throughout the world but also thrives in tropical and subtropical regions. Ficus carica can grow among rocks, in woods, and in hot, dry soils. The first figs in the New World were planted in Figure 1. A young tree of Ficus carica L. about 3-feet Mexico in 1560. In 1669, Europeans sent figs to tall. Note the palmate leaves with “fingers” radiating as Virginia; they were brought to California in 1769. from the palm of a hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Harbour a Systematic Review of the Science 2014
    Sydney Harbour A systematic review of the science 2014 Sydney Institute of Marine Science Technical Report The Sydney Harbour Research Program © Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 2014 This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. Disclaimer The authors of this report are members of the Sydney Harbour Research Program at the Sydney Institute of Marine Science and represent various universities, research institutions and government agencies. The views presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of The Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the authors other affiliated institutions listed below. This report is a review of other literature written by third parties. Neither the Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the affiliated institutions take responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability, and correctness of any information included in this report provided in third party sources. Recommended Citation Hedge L.H., Johnston E.L., Ayoung S.T., Birch G.F., Booth D.J., Creese R.G., Doblin M.A., Figueira W.F., Gribben P.E., Hutchings P.A., Mayer Pinto M, Marzinelli E.M., Pritchard T.R., Roughan M., Steinberg P.D., 2013, Sydney Harbour: A systematic review of the science, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloging-in-Publication entry ISBN: 978-0-646-91493-0 Publisher: The Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Available on the internet from www.sims.org.au For further information please contact: SIMS, Building 19, Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW 2088 Australia T: +61 2 9435 4600 F: +61 2 9969 8664 www.sims.org.au ABN 84117222063 Cover Photo | Mike Banert North Head The light was changing every minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Human-Mediated Introductions of Australian Acacias
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2011) 17, 771–787 S EDITORIAL Human-mediated introductions of PECIAL ISSUE Australian acacias – a global experiment in biogeography 1 2 1 3,4 David M. Richardson *, Jane Carruthers , Cang Hui , Fiona A. C. Impson , :H Joseph T. Miller5, Mark P. Robertson1,6, Mathieu Rouget7, Johannes J. Le Roux1 and John R. U. Wilson1,8 UMAN 1 Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of ABSTRACT - Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, MEDIATED INTRODUCTIONS OF Aim Australian acacias (1012 recognized species native to Australia, which were Matieland 7602, South Africa, 2Department of History, University of South Africa, PO Box previously grouped in Acacia subgenus Phyllodineae) have been moved extensively 392, Unisa 0003, South Africa, 3Department around the world by humans over the past 250 years. This has created the of Zoology, University of Cape Town, opportunity to explore how evolutionary, ecological, historical and sociological Rondebosch 7701, South Africa, 4Plant factors interact to affect the distribution, usage, invasiveness and perceptions of a Protection Research Institute, Private Bag globally important group of plants. This editorial provides the background for the X5017, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa, 20 papers in this special issue of Diversity and Distributions that focusses on the 5Centre for Australian National Biodiversity global cross-disciplinary experiment of introduced Australian acacias. A Journal of Conservation Biogeography Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box Location Australia and global. 1600, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 6Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Methods The papers of the special issue are discussed in the context of a unified Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa, framework for biological invasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Output Chunks
    MooneyMooney MooneyMooney CreekCreek TrackheadTrackhead toto SomersbySomersby This enjoyable walk starts from where the old Length: 16.1 km Pacific Hwy where you walk along dirt roads and trails for while alongside the wide Mooney Time: 6 hrs Mooney Creek, and under the huge F3 Mooney Climb: 680 m Mooney bridge. The wide track continues upstream, passing a few campsites before crossing Style: One way the wide creek at a pleasant large rock platform. Rating: Track: Hard Not too long after crossing the creek you will pass the lower Mooney Mooney Dam where the old Where: 9.1 km W of Gosford trail leads you uphill past another campsite, a Transport: car bus quarry to the Somersby Reservoir. The track then leads past some rural properties and across the Visit www.wildwalks.com for more info delightful Robinson Creek among the Gymea Lilies before finishing with a section of road walking to the Somersby Store. Brisbane Water National Park Side trips and Alternate routes mentioned in these notes are not included in the tracks overall rating, distance or time estimate. The notes only describe the side trips and Alternate routes in one direction. Allow extra time for resting and exploring areas of interest. Please ensure you and your group are well prepared and equipped for all possible hazards and delays. The authors, staff and owners of wildwalks take care in preparing these notes but will not accept responsibility for any inconvenience, loss or injury sustained by using these notes or maps. Please take care and share your experience through the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat
    REDUCING THE IMPACT OF WEIRS ON AQUATIC HABITAT NSW DETAILED WEIR REVIEW REPORT TO THE NEW SOUTH WALES ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST SYDNEY METROPOLITAN CMA REGION Published by NSW Department of Primary Industries. © State of New South Wales 2006. This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in an unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal use or for non-commercial use within your organisation provided due credit is given to the author and publisher. To copy, adapt, publish, distribute or commercialise any of this publication you will need to seek permission from the Manager Publishing, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange, NSW. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing (July 2006). However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check the currency of the information with the appropriate officer of NSW Department of Primary Industries or the user‘s independent adviser. This report should be cited as: NSW Department of Primary Industries (2006). Reducing the Impact of Weirs on Aquatic Habitat - New South Wales Detailed Weir Review. Sydney Metropolitan CMA region. Report to the New South Wales Environmental Trust. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Flemington, NSW. ISBN: 0 7347 1753 9 (New South Wales Detailed Weir Review) ISBN: 978 0 7347 1833 4 (Sydney Metropolitan CMA region) Cover photos: Cob-o-corn Weir, Cob-o-corn Creek, Northern Rivers CMA (upper left); Stroud Weir, Karuah River, Hunter/Central Rivers CMA (upper right); Mollee Weir, Namoi River, Namoi CMA (lower left); and Hartwood Weir, Billabong Creek, Murray CMA (lower right).
    [Show full text]
  • The Unknown Followers: Discovery of a New Species of Sycobia Walker (Hymenoptera: Epichrysomallinae) Associated with Ficus Benjamina L
    JHR 67: 85–102 (2018)The unknown followers: Discovery of a new species of Sycobia Walker... 85 doi: 10.3897/jhr.67.29733 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://jhr.pensoft.net The unknown followers: Discovery of a new species of Sycobia Walker (Hymenoptera: Epichrysomallinae) associated with Ficus benjamina L. (Moraceae) in the Neotropical region Fernando Henrique Antoniolli Farache1, Cecilia Bernardo Pereira2, Cristiana Koschnitzke2, Levi Oliveira Barros1, Elmecelli Moraes de Castro Souza1, Daniel Tirapeli Felício3, Fabián Gatti4, William Cardona5, Jean-Yves Rasplus6, Rodrigo Augusto Santinelo Pereira1 1 Departamento de Biologia, FFCLRP – USP, 14040-901, Bairro Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Bra- zil 2 Departamento de Botânica, Museu Nacional – UFRJ, 20940-040, São Cristovão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil 3 Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de Ciências, UNESP, 17033-360, Vargem Limpa, Bauru, SP, Brazil 4 Centro de Pesquisa Ecológica Subtropical, DRNEA-Administração e Parques Nacionais, Av. Victoria Aguirre 66, Pto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina 5 Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Calle 13 No. 100 – 00, Cali, Colombia 6 INRA, UMR 1062 CBGP, Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France Corresponding author: Fernando Farache ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Jansta | Received 14 September 2018 | Accepted 27 November 2018 | Published 31 December 2018 http://zoobank.org/320FF83E-A982-4A5B-8523-BEAD93993EE5 Citation: Farache FHA, Pereira CB, Koschnitzke C, Barros LO, Souza EMC, Felício DT, Gatti F, Cardona W, Rasplus J-Y, Pereira RAS (2018) The unknown followers: Discovery of a new species ofSycobia Walker (Hymenoptera: Epichrysomallinae) associated with Ficus benjamina L. (Moraceae) in the Neotropical region. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 67: 85–102.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Gazette No 164 of Friday 23 April 2021
    GOVERNMENT GAZETTE – 4 September 2020 Government Gazette of the State of New South Wales Number 164–Electricity and Water Friday, 23 April 2021 The New South Wales Government Gazette is the permanent public record of official NSW Government notices. It also contains local council, non-government and other notices. Each notice in the Government Gazette has a unique reference number that appears in parentheses at the end of the notice and can be used as a reference for that notice (for example, (n2019-14)). The Gazette is compiled by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office and published on the NSW legislation website (www.legislation.nsw.gov.au) under the authority of the NSW Government. The website contains a permanent archive of past Gazettes. To submit a notice for gazettal, see the Gazette page. By Authority ISSN 2201-7534 Government Printer NSW Government Gazette No 164 of 23 April 2021 DATA LOGGING AND TELEMETRY SPECIFICATIONS 2021 under the WATER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) REGULATION 2018 I, Kaia Hodge, by delegation from the Minister administering the Water Management Act 2000, pursuant to clause 10 of Schedule 8 to the Water Management (General) Regulation 2018 (the Regulation) approve the following data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment. Dated this 15 day of April 2021. KAIA HODGE Executive Director, Regional Water Strategies Department of Planning, Industry and Environment By delegation Explanatory note This instrument is made under clause 10 (1) of Schedule 8 to the Regulation. The object of this instrument is to approve data logging and telemetry specifications for metering equipment that holders of water supply work approvals, water access licences and Water Act 1912 licences and entitlements that are subject to the mandatory metering equipment condition must comply with.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Gateway
    Sydney Gateway State Significant Infrastructure Scoping Report BLANK PAGE Sydney Gateway road project State Significant Infrastructure Scoping Report Roads and Maritime Services | November 2018 Prepared by the Gateway to Sydney Joint Venture (WSP Australia Pty Limited and GHD Pty Ltd) and Roads and Maritime Services Copyright: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of NSW Roads and Maritime Services. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of NSW Roads and Maritime Services constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document controls Approval and authorisation Title Sydney Gateway road project State Significant Infrastructure Scoping Report Accepted on behalf of NSW Fraser Leishman, Roads and Maritime Services Project Director, Sydney Gateway by: Signed: Dated: 16-11-18 Executive summary Overview Sydney Gateway is part of a NSW and Australian Government initiative to improve road and freight rail transport through the important economic gateways of Sydney Airport and Port Botany. Sydney Gateway is comprised of two projects: · Sydney Gateway road project (the project) · Port Botany Rail Duplication – to duplicate a three kilometre section of the Port Botany freight rail line. NSW Roads and Maritime Services (Roads and Maritime) and Sydney Airport Corporation Limited propose to build the Sydney Gateway road project, to provide new direct high capacity road connections linking the Sydney motorway network with Sydney Kingsford Smith Airport (Sydney Airport). The location of Sydney Gateway, including the project, is shown on Figure 1.1. Roads and Maritime has formed the view that the project is likely to significantly affect the environment. On this basis, the project is declared to be State significant infrastructure under Division 5.2 of the NSW Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act), and needs approval from the NSW Minister for Planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet — Parklands
    Fact Sheet — Parklands The parklands at Sydney Olympic Park provide 430 hectares of open space, recreation areas, wetlands and waterways for the people of Sydney located in the heart of the growing metropolitan Sydney. • One of Australia’s largest urban parklands, Sydney Olympic Park is a diverse and special place where protected remnant woodlands, rare saltmarshes, waterbird refuge and mangroves stand alongside places of heritage significance to create a unique parkland setting. • A lasting legacy of the Sydney 2000 Olympic and Paralympic Games, the parklands have been designed and built on land formerly used by government industries including the State Abattoirs, State Brickworks and Commonwealth Department of Defence, and are the result of remediating industrial land — an internationally recognised leading environmental remediation and urban renewal project. • Today, the parklands are playing an increasingly important role as both a local park and as a significant regional park destination as Sydney grows. The parklands are an association of many different parks and places brought together as a single entity for management purposes. • The suburb of Sydney Olympic Park covers an area of 640 hectares, of which 430 hectares are parklands. • There are now over 2.7 million visits to the parklands annually, representing 27.5 percent of Sydney Olympic Park total visitation. • The parklands include the leisure and play areas of Bicentennial Park, Wentworth Common and Blaxland Riverside Park; the sporting grounds at Wilson Park and Archery Park, and Monster and Mountain X facilities; the state heritage listed Newington Armory; the more natural areas of Newington Nature Reserve and Badu Mangroves; the Brickpit and 100 hectares of wetlands and waterways.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Creek Dam Probable Maximum Flood Upgrade
    REGIONAL WATER SECURITY & SEWER UPGRADES MANGROVE CREEK DAM PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD UPGRADE What’s needed? State Government: Description Construction of an upgraded spillway and parapet wall at the Mangrove • Funding of $6m for the project. Creek Dam (MCD) will increase water storage by 38,000ml and ensure • Central Coast Council will dam safety. undertake the management of the project. Mangrove Creek Dam (MCD) is the key water storage for the Central Coast and with a capacity of 190,000ml, represents approximately 94% What’s been done? of the total storage capacity for the Central Coast. Revised flood analysis A preliminary concept design has has identified that the dam cannot meet the current NSW Dam Safety been developed by Council for Committee flood requirements for the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF). the construction of a parapet The dam is currently not permitted to be filled beyond 80% of capacity, wall and spillway. as this allows a flood to be buffered in the airspace of the unfilled portion of the dam to an extent that the PMF can safely pass through the existing spillway. Description (cont.) Benefits Construction of a parapet wall and spillway improvements will • Increase water storage capacity of the Central Coast (15 allow the PMF to pass and increase capability storage to 100%. months additional supply at current demand). This will ensure the safety of the dam and the downstream • Increase the ability to supply water to the Hunter under community and provide an additional 38,000ml of storage, the the Hunter Central Coast Pipeline agreement which is equivalent of 15 months water supply.
    [Show full text]