THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE to Igaming in the UNITED STATES Updated January 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE to Igaming in the UNITED STATES Updated January 2017 THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO iGAMING IN THE UNITED STATES Updated January 2017 Includes new eSports chapter Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION II. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN iGAMING a. The Critical Role of Land-Based Casinos i. As conduits for iGaming ii. As partners with iGaming operators b. Opportunities for Overseas Operators c. Other Industry Opportunities d. Convergence e. Opportunities for Tribal Constituencies III. RECENT HISTORY OF THE LEGALITY AND ENFORCEMENT OF U.S. iGAMING IV. LEGAL iGAMING: STATE-BY-STATE V. STATES CONSIDERING iGAMING LAWS VI. iGAMING FUNDING VII. ONLINE SPORTS BETTING, FANTASY SPORTS AND LOTTERY VIII. eSPORTS IX. PREDICTIONS & TRENDS: LOOKING TOWARD 2017 X. ABOUT IFRAH LAW I. Introduction y 2010, the internet had become an indispensable part of virtually every aspect of our lives. We read newspapers, books, and magazines online instead of on paper, we shopped online B instead of visiting the mall, and we streamed movies directly from the internet rather than renting them from a video store. Also by this time, a large part of our daily interactions with other human beings occurred over the internet, through email, and social media. Yet in 2010, there was no legal internet-based, real money gaming – or iGaming – in the United States. A number of companies, largely located offshore, offered online poker and other games, but did so in a legal gray area. In 2011, the federal government announced that interstate online gaming was conducted illegally and shut down the largest internet poker websites in the U.S. Soon after, states recognized their potential to profit from the iGaming vacuum and passed laws legalizing online intrastate iGaming. In the following years, a growing number of states began permitting real-money online poker and other internet games. Some of these states have even entered into agreements allowing their players to play each other over state lines. The benefit to these states – as well as others that are considering making the jump – is clear. Legal iGaming offers the potential to increase in-state employment by requiring certain jobs and equipment to be kept within state boundaries, and states profit by collecting substantial state tax revenue and licensing fees. For states that already have brick and mortar casinos, iGaming offers opportunities to cross-market and thereby resuscitate struggling hotels and casinos with an influx of new patrons. Although revenue figures have lagged behind the optimistic predictions forecasted by the first states to implement iGaming, it is still an important source of cash for state coffers. Venture capital firms and investment banks have begun to devote time, effort, and money to the industry – a sign that financial experts share the view that iGaming, ultimately, will be successful. Internet gaming will undoubtedly be a growing fixture in the gaming industry over the coming decades. In this report, we seek to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current status of internet gaming in the United States. We begin with the topic of the business opportunities that iGaming offers. This is followed by a discussion on the legality of – and enforcement against – iGaming, including an analysis about the federal statutes that have been applied to iGaming and some of the significant milestones in federal law enforcement against the industry. We then provide detailed information regarding iGaming laws that states have passed or are considering. Next, we address how fantasy sports leagues, the “new kid on the block” of iGaming, will be viewed under state and federal law. In our newest chapter, we delve into the increasingly popular eSports arena and the myriad of legislative concerns that surround this progressive new facet of iGaming. Finally, we offer our predictions for iGaming trends in the coming year and beyond. Our hope is to provide readers with an up-to-date resource on the current status of the iGaming industry in the United States, which will be updated regularly as developments occur. 4 © 2017 Ifrah Law II. Business Opportunities in iGaming Gaming poses business opportunities for a number of participants, not only including entities involved directly with the games, but also an assortment of providers required in order to offer i the product in a manner consistent with regulatory requirements. For the most part, iGaming is structured around the sharing of revenues and the costs and benefits of marketing. a. THE CRITICAL ROLE OF LAND-BASED CASINOS While iGaming offers many opportunities for profit, the industry is more restrictive than many others. Those restrictions limit profit to some extent and arise from the regulations imposed on providers in this field. In the United States, iGaming has developed according to a model different from the way in which the industry operates in Europe and the rest of the world. A company wishing to offer iGaming cannot simply do so from the cloud; rather, iGaming is offered exclusively through contractual partnerships between the internet platform operators and existing land-based casinos already holding gaming licenses from state regulatory authorities. iGaming developed along this path as a result of a number of factors, including the political power and economic leverage wielded by land-based operators and fear on the part of land-based operators that the iGaming business would cannibalize brick and mortar revenues. These fears have been largely assuaged as the casinos have realized that the customers coming to iGaming platforms are demographically different from their land-based customers, but the model still remains. Each of the state regulatory schemes that has been enacted in the United States thus far has followed this model, requiring partnering with licensed land-based casinos. But of course there is a limited number of land-based casinos, making opportunities to offer iGaming similarly limited. And the cost of entry into the industry is fairly high – including the costs of acquiring a land-based license, the costs of acquiring a license as an iGaming provider, and the hard costs of setting up the servers in the brick and mortar locations to provide the infrastructure for the online gaming products. Generally, iGaming providers partner with the land-based casinos in contractual agreements that focus on revenue-sharing. In some cases, the iGaming provider shares its portion of the revenue with other downstream participants – for example, in those cases in which the iGaming provider does not own the actual software used in the online gaming product. Thus far, for the most part, the land-based casinos have taken a largely hands-off approach to the management of the online products, leaving it to the iGaming providers to handle those matters. On the other hand, in many cases, the entry point for consumers to use the online gaming product is via the land-based casino’s website. This offers certain advantages for land-based casinos that are already well-known and enjoy significant brand recognition. One exception to this general rule is Trump’s online gaming, which is managed by Betfair and accessed through Betfair’s website exclusively; however, that is an historical consequence of the buyout of Trump Hotel with a reservation by Trump of the exclusive right to offer iGaming under the “Trump” brand name. 6 © 2017 Ifrah Law b. OPPORTUNITIES FOR OVERSEAS OPERATORS While iGaming in the United States has attracted many overseas providers (and certainly offers them opportunities in this market), those overseas providers face some unique issues. The expense of marketing – which is substantial – has generally been laid at the feet of the iGaming providers. The hotels, which already have customer lists and loyalty programs, usually provide the contact information of their customers to their iGaming provider partners to use in marketing campaigns, but otherwise largely leave marketing (and the cost therefore) to the iGaming providers. For those who come from overseas, the responsibility for carrying the sole burden of marketing may be unusual, and the sheer cost of entry may be daunting for smaller entities. Also, as the continuing PokerStars licensing determination in New Jersey shows, providers who accepted U.S. players as customers after 2006 may face hurdles or even barriers to their entry into the U.S. state-regulated market now. c. OTHER INDUSTRY OPPORTUNITIES iGaming offers numerous opportunities for others as well. Because of regulatory requirements for security and safety, provision of online gaming also requires the involvement of banks (for payment processing) and security affiliates (for verification of age and identity), among others. In some states, some of these ancillary providers are required to be licensed by the regulatory authority, though in some states that process is less intense and less intrusive than the licensing process applicable to those entities that will be in direct contact with customers during the offering of the online gaming product. Because data privacy, cybersecurity and underage gambling are very important concerns for regulators, these ancillary providers are viewed by regulators as extremely important participants in the industry. d. CONVERGENCE In these first years of state-regulated iGaming in the United States, much business analysis has focused on “convergence” – the extent to which the success of the brick and mortar hotel and casino and the internet-based gaming products are intertwined and mutually supportive. The use of existing hotel customer bases for marketing is one way in which the land-based partners have provided support for the marketing of their iGaming partners. The hope and goal of many hotel-iGaming partnerships is that iGaming, which is attracting a customer base from different demographic groups than the hotels themselves, will attract those new customer groups to spend money at the land-based hotels and casinos. The possible means for doing this are limited only by the imagination of creative marketing professionals, but they include sponsorship of tournaments, loyalty point programs, coupon offers, and the like.
Recommended publications
  • D I S P O S I T I O N Amended
    D I S P O S I T I O N Amended * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * A G E N D A NEVADA GAMING COMMISSION MEETING (STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD) State Gaming Control Board Offices Hearing Room 2450 555 East Washington Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada November 21, 2013 10:00 A.M. • Pledge of Allegiance • Public Comments • Nonrestricted Agenda Items • Restricted Agenda Items • New Game(s)/Device(s) • Gaming Employee Registrations Pursuant to NRS 463.335(13) • Complaint(s) 1:00 P.M. • Regulation(s) • Other • Public Comments Members Present: Peter Bernhard, Chairman Tony Alamo, M.D., Member Joseph W. Brown, Member John T. Moran, Jr., Member Randolph J. Townsend, Member Nevada Gaming Commission November 21, 2013 Page 2 10:00 A.M. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS: This public comment agenda item is provided in accordance with NRS 241.020(2)(c)(3) which requires an agenda provide for a period devoted to comments by the general public, if any, and discussion of those comments. No action may be taken upon a matter raised under this item of the agenda until the matter itself has been specifically included on an agenda as an item upon which action will be taken. COMMENTS TAKEN. 3. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION: CONSIDERATION OF: NONRESTRICTED, RESTRICTED, AND NEW GAME(S)/DEVICE(S) AGENDA ITEMS. ACTION TAKEN AS REFLECTED ON THE NONRESTRICTED AND RESTRICTED AGENDA MATERIALS. GAMING EMPLOYEE REGISTRATIONS 4. FOR POSSIBLE ACTION: CONSIDERATION OF: Gaming Employee Registrations Pursuant to NRS 463.335(13). ACTION TAKEN AS REFLECTED ON THE GAMING EMPLOYEE REGISTRATIONS AGENDA MATERIALS. COMPLAINT(S) 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine
    Maryland p a3 Historical Magazine X p P P N 5' a AMM jijrM i 2 p Published Quarterly by the Museum and Libraiy of Maiyland History The Maiyland Historical Society Winter 1992 THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES, 1992-93 L. Patrick Deering, Chairman Jack S. Griswold, President Dorothy Mcllvain Scott, Vice President Bryson L. Cook, Counsel A. MacDonough Plant, Secretary William R. Amos, Treasurer Term expires 1993 Term Expires 1996 Clarence W. Blount Gary Black, Jr. E. Phillips Hathaway Louis G. Hecht Charles McC Mathias J.Jefferson Miller II Walter D. Pinkard, Sr. Howard R. Rawlings Orwin C. Talbott Jacques T Schlenger David Mel. Williams Trustees Representing Baltimore City and Counties Term Expires 1994 Baltimore City, Kurt L. Schmoke (Ex Officio) Forrest F. Bramble, Jr. Allegany Co., J. Glenn Beall, Jr. (1993) Stiles T. Colwill Anne Arundel Co., Robert R. Neall (Ex Officio) George D. Edwards II Baltimore Co., Roger B. Hayden (Ex Officio) Bryden B. Hyde Calvert Co., Louis L. Goldstein (1995) Stanard T Klinefelter Carroll Co., William B. Dulany (1995) Mrs. Timothy E. Parker Frederick Co., Richard R. Kline (1996) Richard H. Randall, Jr. Harford Co., Mignon Cameron (1995) Truman T Semans Kent Co., J. Hurst Purnell, Jr. (1995) M. David Testa Montgomery Co., George R. Tydings (1995) H. Mebane Turner Prince George's Co., John W. Mitchell (1995) Term Expires 1995 Washington Co., E. Mason Hendrickson (1993) James C. Alban HI Worcester Co., Mrs. Brice Phillips (1995) H. Furlong Baldwin Chairman Emeritus P McEvoy Cromwell Samuel Hopkins Benjamin H. Griswold HI J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaming Regulatory Jurisdiction: the Dual Criteria of Location Acceptability and Applicant Suitability
    GAMING REGULATORY JURISDICTION: THE DUAL CRITERIA OF LOCATION ACCEPTABILITY AND APPLICANT SUITABILITY Sean McGuinness,∗ Laury Macauley,∗∗ Kade Miller∗∗∗ & Paul Bible∗∗∗∗ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Overview .........................................................................................35 II. Authority ........................................................................................36 III. Location Acceptability Versus Applicant Suitability ...............37 A. Iowa Code ................................................................................37 B. Nevada Location Acceptability .............................................39 C. Mississippi Location Acceptability .......................................42 IV. Applicant Suitability .....................................................................43 V. Conditional Licenses .....................................................................44 ∗ Partner, Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP, Reno, Nevada; Licensed to practice law in Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, and Mississippi; J.D., Drake University Law School, 1989; M.A., Drake University, 1989; B.A., Drake University, 1986. This author practices gaming law before the Nevada State Gaming Control Board, the Nevada Gaming Commission, the Colorado Division of Gaming, the Colorado Limited Gaming Control Commission, the Iowa Racing & Gaming Commission, and the Mississippi Gaming Commission. ∗∗ Owner, Macauley Law Group, P.C., Reno, Nevada; J.D., University of San Francisco School of Law, 1986; B.A., University of California, Berkeley, 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • UNLV IGI Japan
    Practical Perspectives on Gambling Regulatory Processes for Study by Japan: Eliminating Organized Crime in Nevada Casinos US Japan Business Council | August 25, 2017 Jennifer Roberts, J.D. Brett Abarbanel, Ph.D. Bo Bernhard, Ph.D. With Contributions from André Wilsenach, Breyen Canfield, Ray Cho, 1 and Thuon Chen Practical Perspectives on Gambling Regulatory Processes for Study by Japan: Eliminating Organized Crime in Nevada Casinos Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Report Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 Historical Review of the Legalization of Casino Gaming in Nevada ............................................. 4 Gambling Legalization in Nevada – The (Not So) Wild West ................................................... 4 Nevada’s Wide-Open Gambling Bill .......................................................................................... 5 Developing The Strip – The Mob Moves In ............................................................................... 6 A Turning Point – The Kefauver Hearings and Aftermath ......................................................... 7 Nevada’s Corporatization Phase ............................................................................................... 10 Remnants of the Mob and Frank “Lefty” Rosenthal ................................................................ 11 Eliminating
    [Show full text]
  • Disposition October 2020 Meeting
    NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD DISPOSITION OCTOBER 2020 MEETING NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD MEETING IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNOR'S EMERGENCY DIRECTIVE #006, DATED MARCH 22, 2020, THE OCTOBER 2020 MEETING OF THE NEVADA GAMING CONTROL BOARD WAS CONDUCTED BY MEANS OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION. Wednesday, October 7, 2020 9:00 a.m. Public Comments Approval of Prior Month GCB Disposition and Workshop/Meeting Minutes Nonrestricted Items #01-10-20 through #07-10-20 10:30 a.m. Restricted Items #01-10-20 through #09-10-20 Casino/Player Dispute Appeals, Pursuant to NRS 463.363 Informational Items Public Comments Members Present: Sandra Douglass Morgan, Chairwoman (via video) Terry Johnson, Member (via video) Phil Katsaros, Member (via video) This Disposition has not yet been approved and is subject to revision at the next meeting of the Nevada Gaming Control Board. Upon conclusion of that meeting if a revised Disposition is not posted, this document is deemed approved. DISPOSITION INDEX OCTOBER 2020 i 3535 LV Newco, LLC ............................................ NR #4 Kelley, Drew Michael ............................................. NR #1 4GC, LLC .............................................................. NR #6 Klanian, Nicholas Isaac ........................................... R #5 7-11 Store #32194 .................................................. R #7 Kontomerkos, Mario Christian ............................... NR #1 7-11 Store #39991 .................................................. R #8 7689 Tavern, LLC ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • This Agenda Is Posted for Public Inspection in the Following Locations
    This Agenda is Posted for Public Inspection in the Following Locations: 1919 COLLEGE PARKWAY, CARSON CITY, NEVADA 885 EAST MUSSER STREET, CARSON CITY, NEVADA 209 EAST MUSSER STREET, CARSON CITY, NEVADA 100 STEWART STREET, CARSON CITY, NEVADA 555 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE, HEARING ROOM 2450, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA * STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD MEETING GAMING CONTROL BOARD OFFICES GRANT SAWYER BUILDING HEARING ROOM 2450 555 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 Wednesday, November 6, 2013 9:00 a.m. • Public Comments • Nonrestricted Items # 01-11-13 through # 09-11-13 10:30 a.m. • Any Item Continued from 9:00 a.m. Session • Nonrestricted Items # 10-11-13 through # 29-11-13 Thursday, November 7, 2013 9:00 a.m. • Any Items Continued From Wednesday, November 6, 2013 Session • Nonrestricted Item # 30-11-13 • Restricted Items # 01-11-13 through # 17-11-13 • New Game(s) – Final Approval • Consideration of Gaming Employee Registration Appeals Pursuant to NRS 463.335 • Consideration of Gaming Employee Registration Appeals Pursuant to Regulation 5.109 • Consideration of Casino/Player Dispute Appeals Pursuant to NRS 463.363 • Informational Items • Regulation Agenda • Public Comments NEVADA GAMING COMMISSION MEETING GAMING CONTROL BOARD OFFICES GRANT SAWYER BUILDING HEARING ROOM 2450 555 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE LAS VEGAS, NV 89101 Thursday, November 21, 2013 * IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 241.020(2)(d)(2) OF THE NEVADA REVISED STATUTES, ALL OF THE AGENDAED ITEMS ARE SUBJECT FOR POSSIBLE ACTION AND DISPOSITION BY THE STATE GAMING CONTROL BOARD OR NEVADA GAMING COMMISSION, OR BOTH, UNLESS THE AGENDA ITEM SPECIFICALLY INDICATES OTHERWISE. ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF ORDER; TWO OR MORE AGENDA ITEMS MAY BE COMBINED FOR CONSIDERATION; AND/OR AT ANY TIME, AN AGENDA ITEM MAY BE REMOVED OR DISCUSSION DELAYED.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNEXURE A: Sanction Outcomes Findings As at 28 September 2020
    ANNEXURE A: Sanction Outcomes Findings as at 28 September 2020 # Concessions Net ban Total rounds # Coach Sanction Tier Team Enemy Team Tournament Date Map Round Start Round End Match Link Video Link cases applied (%) (months) triggered iGame.com Tricked Europe Minor Closed Qualifier - PGL Major Krakow 2017 19-Jul-2017 Nuke 0 - 0 22 - 25 47 Match Link Video Link 1 Twista 2 Tier 1 12.50% 15.75 iGame.com Spirit Academy Hellcase Cup 6 6-Sep-2017 Nuke 18 - 18 20 - 22 6 Match Link Video Link maquinas Ambush ESEA Season 32 Advanced Playoffs 14-Nov-2019 Mirage 0 - 0 16 - 7 23 Match Link Video Link 2 casle 2 Tier 2 0 10 maquinas North WESG 2019 North Europe Closed Qualifier 27-Nov-2019 Overpass 4 - 9 16 - 19 22 Match Link Video Link Furious Gaming Latingamers La Liga Pro Trust 2019 - Apertura 25-Aug-2019 Mirage 0 - 0 0 - 1 1 Match Link Video Link 3 dinamito 2 Tier 2 0 10 Furious Gaming Sinisters Aorus League 2019 #3 Southern Cone 6-Sep-2019 Inferno 0 - 0 11 - 16 27 Match Link Video Link 4 ArnoZ1K4 1 Tier 2 0 10 Evidence Reapers Dell Gaming Liga Pro Season 1 - #4 APR/19 12-Apr-2019 Train 0 - 0 16 - 10 26 Match Link Video Link Tricked pro100 LOOT.BET Cup 2 - cs_summit 2 Qualifier 13-Dec-2017 Mirage 0 - 0 11 - 7 18 Match Link Video Link Tricked EURONICS United Masters League 21-Nov-2018 Dust2 0 - 0 4 - 2 6 Match Link Video Link Tricked LDLC United Masters League 28-Nov-2018 Mirage 0 - 0 16 - 12 28 Match Link Video Link Tier 1 5 Rejin 7 45% 19.8 Tricked HAVU Kalashnikov CUP 29-Nov-2018 Train 0 - 0 10 - 15 25 Aggravated Match Link Video Link Tricked
    [Show full text]
  • Esports Yearbook 2017/18
    Julia Hiltscher and Tobias M. Scholz eSports Yearbook 2017/18 ESPORTS YEARBOOK Editors: Julia Hiltscher and Tobias M. Scholz Layout: Tobias M. Scholz Cover Photo: Adela Sznajder, ESL Copyright © 2019 by the Authors of the Articles or Pictures. ISBN: to be announced Production and Publishing House: Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt. Printed in Germany 2019 www.esportsyearbook.com eSports Yearbook 2017/18 Editors: Julia Hiltscher and Tobias M. Scholz Contributors: Sean Carton, Ruth S. Contreras-Espinosa, Pedro Álvaro Pereira Correia, Joseph Franco, Bruno Duarte Abreu Freitas, Simon Gries, Simone Ho, Matthew Jungsuk Howard, Joost Koot, Samuel Korpimies, Rick M. Menasce, Jana Möglich, René Treur, Geert Verhoeff Content The Road Ahead: 7 Understanding eSports for Planning the Future By Julia Hiltscher and Tobias M. Scholz eSports and the Olympic Movement: 9 A Short Analysis of the IOC Esports Forum By Simon Gries eSports Governance and Its Failures 20 By Joost Koot In Hushed Voices: Censorship and Corporate Power 28 in Professional League of Legends 2010-2017 By Matthew Jungsuk Howard eSports is a Sport, but One-Sided Training 44 Overshadows its Benefits for Body, Mind and Society By Julia Hiltscher The Benefits and Risks of Sponsoring eSports: 49 A Brief Literature Review By Bruno Duarte Abreu Freitas, Ruth S. Contreras-Espinosa and Pedro Álvaro Pereira Correia - 5 - Sponsorships in eSports 58 By Samuel Korpimies Nationalism in a Virtual World: 74 A League of Legends Case Study By Simone Ho Professionalization of eSports Broadcasts 97 The Mediatization of DreamHack Counter-Strike Tournaments By Geert Verhoeff From Zero to Hero, René Treurs eSports Journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreamhack Masters to Move Online – $300,000 Prize Pool Split Across
    DreamHack Masters to move online – $300,000 prize pool split across four regional competitions Confirmed Teams To Date Include Astralis, Ninjas in Pyjamas, ENCE, MIBR, 100 Thieves, TyLoo STOCKHOLM — DreamHack today announced that, due to the ongoing health and safety concerns in the world, and the interest of the safety and health of our players and staff, DreamHack Masters has been rescheduled and will move to an online format to fulfill our promise of bringing the Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS:GO) community the world's best CS:GO action. DreamHack Masters Spring will be split into two time periods: May 19-30, with the group stage of the regional championships in Europe and North America running parallel, and the playoffs taking place June 8-14. The other two regional championships, Asia and Oceania, will also run simultaneously from June 2-7. The total prize pool of $300,000 will be split between the four regions as follow: $160,000 for Europe; $100,000 for North America; $20,000 for Asia; and $20,000 for Oceania. Each region will run qualifiers running between April 16-20. “We’re very excited to move to an online format for DreamHack Masters Spring,” said Michael Van Driel, Chief Product Officer at DreamHack. “While not being able to compete on LAN is unfortunate, we’ve developed a structure to support teams, players and fans around the world. We look forward to a great competition, showing that the world of esports goes on as we're quick to adapt and find solutions for this new reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Culberson Classic and $1.54 Million the 2008 Rounder of the Year Lee Childs Last Tango from Student to Teacher in Panama
    FAIRWAY JAY’S TIPS ON BETTING COLLEGE BASKETBALL ROUNDERLIFE.com DAVID “CHINO” RHEEM MATT “CUB” WINS WPT DOYLE BRUNSON CULBERSON CLASSIC AND $1.54 MILLION THE 2008 ROUNDER OF THE YEAR LEE CHILDS LAST TANGO FROM STUDENT TO TEACHER IN PANAMA JANUARY 2009 $4.95US INSIDE: POKER + ENTERTAINMENT + FOOD + MUSIC + SPOR T S + G I R L S Hard Rock Hotel Biloxi is proud to announce we have achieved Four Diamond status. 777 BEACH BLVD. BILOXI, MS 39530 | 877.877.6256 | hardrockbiloxi.com LETTER FROM THE EDITOR PUBLISHER Greg McDonald EDITOR-IN-CHIEF with the Southern Evert Caldwell Poker Championship. e two weeks of non stop tournament action get under way Friday January 2nd, with single and mega satellites. ere are a variety of poker MANAGING EDITOR disciplines to choose from including No-Limit Hold ‘Em, Seven Card Stud, Limit Hold ‘Em, Johnny Kampis Seven Card Stud 8 or Better, Omaha 8 or Better, Pot Limit Omaha and Horse. e Buy- CONTRIBUTING EDITOR Ins range from $300 to the $10,000 WPT televised Main Event. Bill Edler won last year’s Dave Lukow championship in dramatic fashion. After being all in on his big blind with 17 players left, Edler came back to capture fi rst place and $747,615. is event is expected to be one of the ART & DESIGN biggest poker events to date in the Southern Region. Casey Wiesel, Nathan Hess, Whitney Prewitt John Phan fi nished 2008 as the number one ranked player in the world in most scoring PHOTOGRAPHY Jack Criswell, Marty McBride systems that include world wide tournaments.
    [Show full text]
  • The Witch-Hunt Against Online Gambling: Why the United States Government Hasn’T Regulated Internet Gaming and Why States’ Rights Are Being Trampled
    The Witch-Hunt Against Online Gambling: Why the United States Government Hasn’t Regulated Internet Gaming and Why States’ Rights Are Being Trampled. The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wallace, Joshua. 2016. The Witch-Hunt Against Online Gambling: Why the United States Government Hasn’t Regulated Internet Gaming and Why States’ Rights Are Being Trampled.. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33797255 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Witch-hunt against Online Gambling: Why the United States Government Hasn’t Regulated Internet Gaming and Why States’ Rights Are Being Trampled. Joshua M. Wallace A Thesis in the Field of Government for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University March 2016 Abstract This study investigates why the United States Government and other parties have systematically targeted online gambling/poker since its inception. Gambling is and always has been a divisive issue, but for the most part the US Government has always sided with the gambling prohibition movement. Current political officials are continuing this trend, even though their allegiances and small-government belief should put them on the other side of the aisle. Politicians are easily swayed on particular issues based on what they think can be given to them in terms of campaign support through endorsements or money.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPERS of the NAACP Part Segregation and Discrimination, 15 Complaints and Responses, 1940-1955
    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCES Microfilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editors: John H. Bracey, Jr. and August Meier PAPERS OF THE NAACP Part Segregation and Discrimination, 15 Complaints and Responses, 1940-1955 Series A: Legal Department Files UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCES Microfilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editors: John H. Bracey, Jr. and August Meier PAPERS OF THE NAACP Part 15. Segregation and Discrimination, Complaints and Responses, 1940-1955 Series A: Legal Department Files Edited by John H. Bracey, Jr. and August Meier Project Coordinator Randolph Boehm Guide compiled by Martin Schipper A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloglng-ln-Publlcatlon Data National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. Papers of the NAACP. [microform] Accompanied by printed reel guides. Contents: pt. 1. Meetings of the Board of Directors, records of annual conferences, major speeches, and special reports, 1909-1950 / editorial adviser, August Meier; edited by Mark Fox - pt. 2. Personal correspondence of selected NAACP officials, 1919-1939 / editorial - [etc.] - pt. 15. Segregation and discrimination, complaints and responses, 1940-1955. 1. National Association for the Advancement of Colored People-Archives. 2. Afro-Americans-Civil Rights-History-20th century-Sources. 3. Afro- Americans-History-1877-1964~Sources. 4. United States-Race relations-Sources. I. Meier, August, 1923- . II. Boehm, Randolph. III. Title. E185.61 [Microfilm] 973'.0496073 86-892185 ISBN 1-55655-460-5 (microfilm : pt.
    [Show full text]