DOCSLIB.ORG

7Orkshop #Urrent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7Orkshop #Urrent 7ORKSHOP$ #URRENT,ABOR2ELATIONS)SSUESIN(IGHER%DUCATION 7ILLIAM!(ERBERT %SQ 0ANEL#HAIR $ISTINGUISHED,ECTURER (UNTER#OLLEGE %XECUTIVE$IRECTOR .ATIONAL#ENTERFORTHE3TUDYOF#OLLECTIVE"ARGAININGIN(IGHER%DUCATION .9# -AIREAD%#ONNOR %SQ ,AW/FFICESOF-AIREAD%#ONNOR 0,,# 3YRACUSE 0ETER$#ONRAD %SQ 0ROSKAUER2OSE,,0 .9# University Petitions Filed/Election Results1 1. CASES PENDING AT THE REGIONAL OFFICE LEVEL A. NOT BEING PROCESSED BY THE NLRB CORNELL UNIVERSITY Private Election Procedure Negotiated by Parties Case Status: Open On March 6, 2017, Graduate Students United, CGSU-AFT notified Cornell of its intent to file a petition. An election was held by manual ballot on March 27 and 28. As of March 29, the second of two days of voting, the ballot count was inconclusive: 856 votes in favor of the Union, 919 votes against representation, and 81 challenged ballots. The Union’s remains unresolved. Since the election, CGSU and the University have been in negotiations for a new agreement that would establish ground rules in that the Union wishes to proceed to a new election. CGSU recently presented the possibility of a new election to its membership in a referendum with three options: file objections to the original election with the arbitrator, agree to language amending the election agreement, or accept the results of the election hled last Spring. Voting on the referendum began on October 16, 2017. A decision by CGSU on how it will proceed is anticipated in January 2018. B. BEING PROCESSED BY THE NLRB UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Case No. 04-RC-199609 Case Status: Open GET-UP UPenn filed a petition on May 30, 2017. Penn is represented by Ballard Spahr; the Union is represented by Willig, Williams & Davidson and Livingston Adler Pulda Meiklejohn & Kelly. A hearing was held in June 2017. Post-hearing briefs were submitted on July 14, and on December 19 a Decision and Direction of Election was issued by the Board scheduling a manual ballot election at a date and time to be determined. The bargaining unit was expanded by the Regional Director under the Board’s recent decision in PCC Structurals (overruling Specialty Healthcare) to include grad students in several schools at Penn who were excluded by the Union. HARVARD UNIVERSITY Case No. 01-RC-186442 Case Status: Open A petition was filed by Harvard Grad Students Union, HGSU-UAW, on October 18, 2016. Harvard is represented Morgan, Brown & Joy; the Union is represented by Segal Roitman and Livingston Adler Pulda Meiklejohn & Kelly. The vote was by manual ballot on November 16 and 17, 2016, pursuant to a Stipulated Election Agreement. Employee status was not challenged 1 Current as of Dec. 29, 2017. The panelists acknowledge with gratitude the work of Paul Salvatore and Steven J. Porzio, Esqs., Prokauer Rose LLP, for their work in compiling this summary. and litigated. All students providing instructional services at Harvard, including graduate and undergraduate students, were eligible to vote. The total number of eligible voters was 3,556. The vote was 1,272 for the union and 1,456 against; 314 ballots were challenged. An objections and challenges hearing was held beginning on February 22, 2017. On April 19, 2017, a hearing officer’s report, adopted by the Regional Director, was issued on the objections and challenged ballots, finding that Harvard had not complied with the voter list requirements and a new election was ordered in the event that upon issuance of a final tally of ballots the union did not receive a majority of the valid votes counted. Harvard appealed on May 3, 2017. On December 12, 2017 the Board issued a decision denying Harvard’s Request for Review of the Regional Director’s Decision and Direction of a Second Election. The case is now being processed in the Regional Office. 2. CASES PENDING BEFORE THE BOARD YALE UNIVERSITY Case No. 01-RC-183014, et al. Case Status: Open Unite-Here, Local 33, filed 10 representation petitions for departmental “microunits” on August 29, 2016. Yale is represented by Proskauer; the Union is represented by McCracken, Stemerman & Holsberry, and Livingston Adler Pulda Meiklejohn & Kelly. The petitoned-for teaching fellows were those providing instructional services in the following academic departments: History of Art, Mathematics, History, East Asian Languages and Literatures, Geology and Geophysics, Political Science, Physics, English, Sociology and Comparative Literature (which was later withdrawn). A 17-day hearing began on September 12, in which the principal issue litigated was the apporiateness of the 10 individual departmental units; Yale was not permitted to litigate fully the empoolye status of its teaching fellows. Four months later, the Regional Director directed 9 separate elections by manual ballot. (UNITE HERE did not request a mail ballot.) The elections were held on February 23, 2017. The Union won in 6 departments, and lst in 1 department (Physics); the outcomes in East Asian Languages and Literatures and Political Science were inconclusive due to determinative challenged ballots. Prior to a hearing to resolve the challenges in those two departments, UNITE HERE withdrew its challenges, resulting in additional wins for the union. A request for review is pending regarding the micro-unit issue; however in light of the NLRB’s December 15 decision in PCC Structurals, Inc., which overturned Specialty Healthcare, it is presently uncertain how the NLRB will proceed on that request. BOSTON COLLEGE Case No. 01-RC-194148 Case Status: Open A petition was filed by Boston College Graduate Employee Union – UAW (BCGEU-UAW) on March 3, 2017. Boston College is represented by Morgan, Brown & Joy, and the Union is represented by Livingston Adler Pulda Meiklejohn & Kelly. A Decision and Direction of Election was issued by the Regional Director on May 17, holding that the Boston College graduate students were entitlteld to an election on representation despite Boston College’s religious affiliation. However, given that the spring term had concluded by the time the decision 2 was issued, an election was deferred to September 12 and 13. In that election, 270 votes were cast for the Union, 224 votes against the Union, and 16 ballots were challenged. A Certification of Representative was issued on September 25. A request for review was filed with the Board and is still pending. On October 13, a Motion to Intervene and for Recusal by Board Member Kaplan was filed. The University filed an opposition on October 25, which has not yet been decided. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Case No. 13-RC-198325 Case Status: Open On May 8, 2017, a petition was filed by Graduate Students United (GSU), AFT-AAUP. The University of Chicago is represented by Proskauer. The Union is represented by Dowd, Bloch, Bennett, Cervone, Auerbach & Yokich. A hearing was held from May 22 to June 2. The parties agreed during the hearing to a manual ballot election during the fall quarter; initially the union proposed a mail ballot during the summer session. A Decision and Direction of Election was issued by the Regional Director on August 8, finding that the University of Chicago graduate students were employees as defined in Columbia University. The University filed a request for review on September 22. On October 12, a Motion to Intervene and for Recusal by Board Member Kaplan was filed. On October 19, the ballots were counted. The Union won, 1103 to 479, with 149 challenged ballots. A Certification of Representative was issued on October 27, 2017. 3. CASES IN WHICH NO APPEAL WAS TAKEN OR APPEAL WAS DENIED AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING HAS COMMENCED A. SCHOOLS REFUSING TO BARGAIN THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK Case No. 02-RC-143012 Case Status: Closed On December 17, 2014, the Graduate Students of Columbia (GWC) with the UAW filed a petition. Columbia is represented by Proskauer, and the Union is represented by Livingston Adler Pulda Meiklejohn & Kelly. Initially, the students were found not to be employees, and on February 6, 2015, the petition was dismissed. The Union appealed, and on March 13, 2015, the case was remanded for a hearing. An election was later directed and held on December 7 and 8, 2016. All student employees (graduate and undergraduate) who provided instructional services were eligible to vote, including those who had provided such services within the preceding year. A total of 4,256 students were determined to be eligible. The votes were counted on December 9. The Union won 1,602 to 623, with 647 cjhallenged ballots. On December 16, 2016, Columbia filed objections to conduct affecting the outcome of the election, and requested that the results be vacated and that a new election be held. The hearing officer recommended that the objections be overruled. The University filed exceptions to the hearing officer’s report. On December 18, 2017 the NLRB issued a its decision denying the University’s request for review and certified the unit. 3 LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Case No. 13-RC-189548 Case Status: Closed on 2/17/2017 A petition was filed on December 9, 2016 by SEIU. Loyola was represented by Franczek Radelet, and the union was represented by a legal representative from SEIU. An election was ordered for all full-time and regular part-time Graduate Assistants (PhD and Masters students) on the main campus, approximately 210 eligible voters in all. The vote was held by mail ballot, which were opened and counted on February 8, 2017. The union won by 71 to 49. There were no challenged ballots. The NLRB issued a decision that reversing the Regional Director’s finding with respect to the Department of Theology on the ground that it had a specific role in maintaining the University’s religious educational environment, applying Pacific Lutheran. However, because there were only 14 eligible voters in the Theology Department, the petitioner’s certification was unaffected.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fannie Weiss Distinguished Faculty Scholar And
    ELLEN DANNIN Fannie Weiss Distinguished Faculty Scholar and Professor of Law Pennsylvania State University Dickinson School of Law Lewis Katz Building University Park, PA 16802-1912 814 865-8996 fax - 814 863-7274 [email protected] ___________________________________________________ ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY - DICKINSON SCHOOL OF LAW, University Park, Pennsylvania Professor of Law, 2006-Present Courses taught: Labor Law, Employment Law, Civil Procedure WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, Detroit, Michigan Professor of Law, 2002 - 2006 Courses taught: Labor Law, Employment Law, Civil Procedure, Labor Law Seminar UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL, Ann Arbor, Michigan Visiting Professor of Law, Winter 2002 Courses taught: Labor Law, Seminar: Immigrants, Work and Justice UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST, M.S. Program in Union Leadership and Administration Visiting Professor, 1999-2002 Course taught: Labor Law CALIFORNIA WESTERN SCHOOL OF LAW, San Diego, California Professor of Law, 1995-2002 Associate Professor of Law, 1991-1995 Courses taught: Labor Law, Employment Law, Civil Procedure, Labor Seminars, Employment Discrimination and Benefits, Public Sector Labor Law, Evidence VICTORIA UNIVERSITY, WELLINGTON, LAW DEPARTMENT, Wellington, New Zealand Scholar in Residence, 1997 Scholar in Residence, 1994 VICTORIA UNIVERSITY, WELLINGTON, CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, Wellington, New Zealand Scholar in Residence, 1992 WAIKATO UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT, Hamilton, New Zealand Scholar in Residence, 1996 OTAGO UNIVERSITY,
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Preseason Release.Indd
    UCLA FOOTBALL UCLA Athletic Communications / J.D. Morgan Center / 325 Westwood Plaza / Los Angeles, CA 90095 Football Contacts: Steve Rourke / [email protected] / o: (310) 206-8187; Andrew Sinatra / [email protected] COMING UP Sat. Nov. 7 - at Colorado (ESPN2) - 4 p.m., PT/ 5 p.m., MT GAME ONE Fri. Nov. 13 - Utah (FS1) - 7:30 p.m. GAME ONE: UCLA at Colorado Venue: Folsom Field - Boulder, Colo. AT A GLANCE vs. Kickoff Time: 4 p.m., PT/ 5 p.m., MT • UCLA owns a 65-31-5 all-time record in season-opening games ... The Nov. 7 starting date is the latest start to a UCLA football season (previous latest start Television: ESPN2 (Beth Mowins, Kirk Morrison, John Schriffen) to a season was 10/13 in 1923) ... The last time a Bruin football team played Radio (UCLA Sports Network from IMG College): AM 570 2019: 5-7, 2019: 4-8, 3-6 Pac-12, less than seven games in a season was in 1922 ... The Dec. 18/19 fi nal game Josh Lewin (play-by-play),Matt Stevens (analyst), Wayne Cook (reporter) 4-5 Pac-12, 5th in Pac-12 South T3rd in Pac-12 South would be the latest end to a Bruin season since 1938 when it played on Dec. XM Ch. 385 / Internet 975 26 and Jan. 2 in Hawaii) BRUINS TO OPEN 2020 SEASON AT COLORADO — UCLA (0-0) will open the 2020 season by traveling to play at Colorado (0-0) in a • The Bruins have split the last four season-opening games played on the road Pac-12 Conference matchup on Saturday, November 7 at Folsom Field.
    [Show full text]
  • The History Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940S
    Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy Volume 9 Creating Solutions in Challenging Times Article 3 December 2017 The iH story Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940s William A. Herbert Hunter College, City University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/jcba Part of the Collective Bargaining Commons, Higher Education Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Labor History Commons, Legal Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Herbert, William A. (2017) "The iH story Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940s," Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy: Vol. 9 , Article 3. Available at: http://thekeep.eiu.edu/jcba/vol9/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy by an authorized editor of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The iH story Books Tell It? Collective Bargaining in Higher Education in the 1940s Cover Page Footnote The er search for this article was funded, in part, by a grant from the Professional Staff onC gress-City University of New York Research Award Program. Mr. Herbert wishes to express his appreciation to Tim Cain for directing him to archival material at Howard University, and to Hunter College Roosevelt Scholar Allison Stillerman for her assistance with the article. He would also like to thank the staff ta the following institutions for their prompt and professional assistance: New York State Library and Archives; Tamiment Library and Robert F.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity Forever? Unions and Bargaining Representation Under New Zealand's Employment Contracts Act
    Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review Volume 18 Number 1 Article 1 12-1-1995 Solidarity Forever? Unions and Bargaining Representation under New Zealand's Employment Contracts Act Ellen Dannin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ellen Dannin, Solidarity Forever? Unions and Bargaining Representation under New Zealand's Employment Contracts Act, 18 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 1 (1995). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol18/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOYOLA OF LOS ANGELES INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 18 DECEMBER 1995 NUMBER 1 Solidarity Forever? Unions and Bargaining Representation Under New Zealand's Employment Contracts Act ELLEN DANNIN* I. Introduction .............................. 2 II. Bargaining Representation and the ECA: Some Initial Considerations ............................ 3 III. Basics of Representation Under the ECA ......... 12 A. Employer Opposition to Union Authorization 14 1. Treatment of Bargaining Representatives 14 2. Union Access to Employees ............ 17 3. Union Party Status ................... 20 4. Withdrawal of Authorizations ........... 22 B. Bargaining with Authorized Representatives ... 33 1. Direct Dealing ....................... 38 2. Dealing with Nonauthorized Representatives 44 3. Pressure to Revoke Authorizations ....... 46 C. Representation Authority as a Procedural Hurdle 52 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 The Cold Culture Wars: The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York Brandon C. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Williams, Brandon C., "The Cold Culture Wars: The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 6955. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/6955 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Cold Culture Wars: The Fight for Democratic Education in Post-War New York Brandon C. Williams Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts & Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Elizabeth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D., Chair Ken-Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. James Siekmeier, Ph.D. Samuel Stack, Ph.D. Melissa Bingmann, Ph.D. Department of History Morgantown, WV 2015 Keywords: Democratic Education, Intercultural Education, Cold War, Civil Rights Copyright 2015 Brandon C.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Organizing for Social Justice: Rank-and-File Teachers' Activism and Social Unionism in California, 1948-1978 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6b92b944 Author Smith, Sara R. Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ ORGANIZING FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: RANK-AND-FILE TEACHERS’ ACTIVISM AND SOCIAL UNIONISM IN CALIFORNIA, 1948-1978 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in HISTORY with an emphasis in FEMINIST STUDIES by Sara R. Smith June 2014 The Dissertation of Sara R. Smith is approved: ______________________ Professor Dana Frank, Chair ______________________ Professor Barbara Epstein ______________________ Professor Deborah Gould ______________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Sara R. Smith 2014 Table of Contents Abstract iv Acknowledgements vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: 57 The Red School Teacher: Anti-Communism in the AFT and the Blacklistling of Teachers in Los Angeles, 1946-1960 Chapter 2: 151 “On Strike, Shut it Down!”: Faculty and the Black and Third World Student Strike at San Francisco State College, 1968-1969 Chapter 3: 260 Bringing Feminism into the Union: Feminism in the California Federation of Teachers in the 1970s Chapter 4: 363 “Gay Teachers Fight Back!”: Rank-and-File Gay and Lesbian Teachers’ Organizing against the Briggs Initiative, 1977-1978 Conclusion 453 Bibliography 463 iii Abstract Organizing for Social Justice: Rank-and-File Teachers’ Activism and Social Unionism in California, 1948-1978 Sara R.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2015 Special Edition
    City Manager Newsletter By TRACKDOWN MANAGEMENT "Providing thread to help stitch together the fabric of the City Management Community" September, 2015 Special Page | 1 Volume No. 9: Issue No. 18 City Management Professions Who Are UCLA Alumni: This issue features a list of public management professional who are alumni of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA); USC's cross-town rivals. In 1919 The Vermont Avenue campus of UCLA, known then as UC's "Southern Branch," opened offering two-year undergraduate teachers- training. The name was changed in 1927 to the University of California at Los Angeles, and in Fowler City Manager David Elias in his San Francisco 1929 the Westwood campus opened with 5,500 Giants jersey gets a hug from the man who bleeds "Dodger blue" former Los Angeles Dodger Manager students. UCLA awarded its first Ph.D. degree. In Tommy Lasorda at a Giants/Dodgers game this 1964 UCLA won the first of 10 NCAA men's season. On September 12, 2015 the Dodgers were 7 basketball championships under Coach John and a half games in front of the Giants in the Wooden. In 2008 the Ronald Reagan UCLA National League West Division race. David has Medical Center opened. In 2014 UCLA Ranked served as the Fowler City Manager since April, 1986. No. 1 In California Peace Corps volunteers. / http / http http http / / http http://www.ocsec.com/ http http://www.ocsec.com/ / / / http.aspx Jack & Susan Simpson, 16707 Gerritt Avenue, Cerritos, CA 90703 O | 562/926-0800 M | 562/896-5424 M | 310/418-1035 www.trackdownmanagement.net | [email protected] | [email protected] City Manager Newsletter By Trackdown Management Page 2 September, 2015 Special City Management Professions Who borah Collins began her working career in Sausalito as an Administrative Assistant Are UCLA Alumni: with an information technology and services firm in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations
    S. Prt. 107–84 EXECUTIVE SESSIONS OF THE SENATE PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS VOLUME 4 EIGHTY-THIRD CONGRESS FIRST SESSION 1953 ( MADE PUBLIC JANUARY 2003 Printed for the use of the Committee on Governmental Affairs U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 83–872 WASHINGTON : 2003 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jan 31 2003 21:53 Mar 31, 2003 Jkt 083872 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HR\OC\83872PL.XXX 83872PL COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 107TH CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION JOSEPH I. LIEBERMAN, Connecticut, Chairman CARL LEVIN, Michigan FRED THOMPSON, Tennessee DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii TED STEVENS, Alaska RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio MAX CLELAND, Georgia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah MARK DAYTON, Minnesota JIM BUNNING, Kentucky PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois JOYCE A. RECHTSCHAFFEN, Staff Director and Counsel RICHARD A. HERTLING, Minority Staff Director DARLA D. CASSELL, Chief Clerk PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS CARL LEVIN, Michigan, Chairman DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii, SUSAN M. COLLINS, Maine RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT G. TORRICELLI, New Jersey GEORGE V. VOINOVICH, Ohio MAX CLELAND, Georgia THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah MARK DAYTON, Minnesota JIM BUNNING, Kentucky PETER G. FITZGERALD, Illinois ELISE J. BEAN, Staff Director and Chief Counsel KIM CORTHELL, Minority Staff Director MARY D.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid Prepared by David Kennaly Washington, D.C
    THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RARE BOOK AND SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DIVISION THE RADICAL PAMPHLET COLLECTION Finding aid prepared by David Kennaly Washington, D.C. - Library of Congress - 1995 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RARE BOOK ANtI SPECIAL COLLECTIONS DIVISIONS RADICAL PAMPHLET COLLECTIONS The Radical Pamphlet Collection was acquired by the Library of Congress through purchase and exchange between 1977—81. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 25 Number of items: Approx: 3465 Scope and Contents Note The Radical Pamphlet Collection spans the years 1870-1980 but is especially rich in the 1930-49 period. The collection includes pamphlets, newspapers, periodicals, broadsides, posters, cartoons, sheet music, and prints relating primarily to American communism, socialism, and anarchism. The largest part deals with the operations of the Communist Party, USA (CPUSA), its members, and various “front” organizations. Pamphlets chronicle the early development of the Party; the factional disputes of the 1920s between the Fosterites and the Lovestoneites; the Stalinization of the Party; the Popular Front; the united front against fascism; and the government investigation of the Communist Party in the post-World War Two period. Many of the pamphlets relate to the unsuccessful presidential campaigns of CP leaders Earl Browder and William Z. Foster. Earl Browder, party leader be—tween 1929—46, ran for President in 1936, 1940 and 1944; William Z. Foster, party leader between 1923—29, ran for President in 1928 and 1932. Pamphlets written by Browder and Foster in the l930s exemplify the Party’s desire to recruit the unemployed during the Great Depression by emphasizing social welfare programs and an isolationist foreign policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Knott's Berry
    17_287699-bindex.qxp 8/26/08 7:33 PM Page 332 Index See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX Agua at the Mondrian, 243 Arroyo Terrace, 193 Ahmanson Building, 178 Arte de Mexico, 255 Ahmanson Theatre, 279 Art galleries, 255–256 AAA (American Automobile AirAmbulanceCard.com, 43 Arts & Letters, 246–247 Association), 34, 321 Airports, 31 ATMs (automated teller Aardvark’s Odd Ark, 245, 261 Akbar, 272 machines), 40 AARP, 44 Amadeus Aveda Spa, 159 Audiences Unlimited, 202, 206 The Abbey, 272 American Airlines Vacations, 48 Autry, Gene, 165 ABC TV tapings, 203 American Automobile Associa- The Avalon Hollywood, 267 Above and Beyond Tours, 44 tion (AAA), 34, 321 Avila Adobe, 185 A.B.S. by Allen Schwartz, 244 American Cinematheque, 284 Avis Rent a Car, for disabled A Bug’s Land (Disneyland), 226 American Express, 321 travelers, 43 Access-Able Travel Source, 43 traveler’s checks, 42 Access America, 324 American Express Travelers Accessible Journeys, 43 Cheque Card, 42 abe’s & Ricky’s Inn, 269 Accommodations, 67–109. See B American Film Institute’s Los Baby gear and babysitters, also Accommodations Index Angeles International Film 45, 321 Anaheim, 227–230 Festival, 30 Backdraft, 171 best, 5–7, 68 American Foundation for the The Baked Potato, 270 downtown, 100–105 Blind (AFB), 43 Balboa Bike & Beach Stuff family-friendly, 104 American Girl Place, 252 (Newport Beach), 293, 294 Hollywood, 97–99 American Indian Festival and Balboa Island, 294–295 Knott’s Berry Farm, 237–238 Market, 27 Balboa Pavilion & Fun Zone L.A.’s Westside & Beverly American Rag Cie, 258 (Newport Beach), 295–296 Hills, 82–97 Amoeba Music, 258 Barnes & Noble, 256 Long Beach, 288–289 Amtrak, 34 Barneys New York, 242 near the airport, 81–82 Anaheim.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding the Workers'
    Finding the Workers’ Law Ellen Dannin FEW YEARS AGO, a local public official. Today, most people may regard any radio producer called. He wanted business representative as neutral and reli- a nonpartisan, expert guest to able, while unions are partisan and a special analyze issues involved in a strike for a talk interest. If correct, this explains why the Ashow. I answered his questions about collec- National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the tive bargaining and strikes with basic labor National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), and law: an employer must bargain with a union; unions are popularly regarded as irrelevant the law protects employees’ right to strike for and even un-American. If true, this experi- higher wages; and an employer violates the ence may capture some reasons why union law if it fires them for striking. membership is declining. I was not surprised that the producer did not call back, for I could sense that to him my Of What Use Are Unions? explanation of black letter labor law seemed so radical, it could not be true. Instead, the Certainly, union membership is not declin- show’s sole guest was the struck company’s ing because they have no work to do. Unions human resources director. still help bring the poor out of poverty. I suspect that few in the audience thought Unionized workers make from $4,000 to it odd to hear the views of only one party to $0,000 more a year than unorganized work- a dispute when that person was a company ers doing the same work.¹ Unionized work- Ellen Dannin is a professor of law at Wayne State University Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Intent and Impasse Resolution Under the National Labor Relations Act: Does Law Matter? Ellen J
    Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 2 1997 Legislative Intent and Impasse Resolution Under the National Labor Relations Act: Does Law Matter? Ellen J. Dannin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj Recommended Citation Dannin, Ellen J. (1997) "Legislative Intent and Impasse Resolution Under the National Labor Relations Act: Does Law Matter?," Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal: Vol. 15: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/hlelj/vol15/iss1/2 This document is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Labor and Employment Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dannin: Legislative Intent and Impasse Resolution Under the National Labo ARTICLES LEGISLATIVE INTENT AND IMPASSE RESOLUTION UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT: DOES LAW MATTER? Ellen J. Dannin* "Impasse and implementation is the dominant consideration of virtually every negotiation" that he has been involved in, said Samuel McKnight, a union attorney .... "It is a prospect that is so attractive to employers and so menacing to unions and workers that we don't really like to talk about it." The possibility of impasse implementation has reduced the lan- guage of collective bargaining to "a list of words and phrases that unions can never use and employers must always use," such as "deadlock," "bottom line," "best offer," and 'final offer," said McKnight.' * Professor of Law, California Western School of Law, San Diego, California.
    [Show full text]