Report of the IOC Evaluation Commission for the Games of the XXIX Olympiad in 2008
Original version: English © International Olympic Committee Lausanne, Switzerland 3 April 2001 Contents
General Introduction 5
Osaka 9
Paris 25
Toronto 43
Beijing 59
Istanbul 77
Conclusion 95
Appendices 97
General Introduction
The members of the IOC Evaluation As stated, the Commission has a defined technical Commission (the Commission) for the Games evaluation role but it is impossible to ignore of the XXIX Olympiad in 2008 are pleased to the public debate on political issues such as have been part of a new, two-phase candidature human rights which, in the present context, is procedure adopted by the IOC following the imposed on sport. The Commission will not recommendations made by the IOC 2000 deal with this issue other than to acknowledge Commission and subsequent decisions of the the existence of the debate and its continuation. 110th IOC Session in December 1999. Members of the IOC will have to reach their own conclusions. In this new procedure the Commission visited only those cities which had passed the initial The Commission is grateful for the high quality selection phase during which basic technical of the Candidature Files and the presentations requirements were examined by a team of made during the visits. This has greatly assisted experts. in the preparation of this report.
On 28th August 2000, five cities were accepted as As additional background information, the Candidate Cities for 2008 by the IOC Executive Commission has been able to call upon Board. independent research on the five Candidate Cities commissioned by the IOC from: It is the opinion of the Commission that this new procedure is an excellent one – as has already MORI (Market & Opinion Research been stated widely in the many positive reactions International) received. Opinion polls were carried out in each of the Candidate Cities and countries in The 2008 Evaluation Commission is composed November-December 2000 of representatives of all components of the Olympic Movement: the IOC, IFs, NOCs, THE PRS GROUP (Political Risk Services) athletes, IPC (International Paralympic Country reports on current political, monetary Committee), former organisers of Olympic and economic risks Games and experts. IDATE (European Audio-visual and The Commission has been required to go Telecommunications Institute) into much greater detail than before in carrying out an analysis of all bids to inform The Commission’s report is presented on a city the IOC of the challenges or difficulties by city basis. The order of cities follows the official which could be faced in each of these cities order of drawing of lots as carried out by the IOC in the seven years up to and including a 2008 Session on 13th September 2000 in the presence Olympic Games.* of the Candidate Cities. The order is: Osaka, Paris, Toronto, Beijing, Istanbul. This order has The Commission’s task is a technical one. been used throughout the candidature procedure in It has to verify the information in a City’s all presentations, press conferences, etc. Candidature File, determine whether the plans are feasible and make an overall risk The report represents the unanimous opinion assessment. of all Commission members and contains
5 General Introduction
information received up until the Commission’s departure from each city (see visit dates in the appendices).
* Olympic Games: Throughout the report Olympic Games refers also to Paralympic Games.
6 General Introduction
b c e d
a
a b c d e
Candidate Cities
7 Osaka
9 Osaka
THEME 1: NATIONAL, REGIONAL AND THEME 2: LEGAL ASPECTS CANDIDATE CITY CHARACTERISTICS The Commission received a presentation on Political Structure legal matters with specific information as follows: The Japanese Constitution allows local Governments to hold executive power and – confirmation was given that those individuals to have financial responsibility for most who signed formal guarantees had the power functions in their own areas. to do so
National elections will take place in 2004 and – confirmation was provided that there was no 2008 and regional and local elections in 2003 and legislation in Japan which would conflict with 2007. the Olympic Movement Anti-Doping Code