The UK Parliament and Coronavirus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The UK Parliament and Coronavirus Published on The Institute for Government (https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk) Home > The UK parliament and coronavirus The UK parliament and coronavirus [1] Since the coronavirus pandemic began to worsen in the UK, both Houses of the UK parliament have had to adapt their ways of working. Currently, the House of Lords is operating on a hybrid basis with a mixture of (socially distanced) in-person and virtual participation. Any formal votes are taking place remotely. By contrast, the House of Commons is working largely on a (socially-distanced) in-person basis, with MPs who are unable to attend parliament able to participate remotely in some limited forms of business and vote by proxy. The worsening of the pandemic, and the imposition of a second national lockdown [2] beginning on 5 November, have led some MPs and unions to call for a return to remote proceedings. Why does the coronavirus pose challenges for parliament? [3] The Palace of Westminster, home to the UK parliament, is a workplace as well as a cornerstone of the nation’s democracy. There are 650 MPs in the House of Commons, over 800 peers in the adjacent House of Lords, and 3,000 parliamentary staff serving both – as well as the staff employed by individual members. This means that there are large numbers of people in and around the parliamentary estate every day – all of whom could potentially be affected by or accelerate the spread of the virus. As with the general population, some members and staff will have underlying medical conditions (such as asthma or diabetes), and a significant number of peers are aged over 70. According to government advice, this puts them in higher risk categories. Since March all workplaces in the UK have needed to adapt their ways of working in response to the coronavirus. For parliament, the situation is complicated by its constitutional role, and the need to ensure that both Houses can continue to pass laws and hold the government to account. A further complication is the fact that most parliamentary processes assume that MPs and peers will physically be present, for example: Most votes [4] (with the exception of deferred divisions, which are done on paper) require MPs and peers to physically walk through the division lobbies to cast their vote. Since 2019, MPs on parental leave have been able to nominate another MP to vote as their proxy. Debates, including on legislation, take place in person in both chambers. Daily opportunities to ask questions of ministers in the Commons, including Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), also take place in person, although there is also an established system for asking written questions. Select committees [5] meet and hold evidence sessions in person. But the nature of the current pandemic means that meeting and working in person carries health risks. This is different to other historic challenges that the UK parliament has faced. For example, although the Commons experienced bomb damage during WWII, this necessitated changes to the venue of its meetings, rather than making the actual nature of its meetings risky. Multiple MPs – including the prime minister – have either been diagnosed with the coronavirus, or had to self-isolate, over the past eight months, highlighting the need for parliament to adapt its usual ways of working. How has parliament adapted in response to the coronavirus pandemic? [6] Since March, the Commons and the Lords have made a number of changes to their ways of working. The two Houses have done this separately, as they each have their own rules and processes. In both Houses, this has involved the rapid development of new systems and technologies by parliamentary staff. The Commons In March 2020, as the pandemic worsened across the UK, the Commons adopted some practical measures, such as barring visitors. It also rose a few days early for its planned Easter recess. After the Commons returned from its Easter recess in mid-April, MPs agreed to adopt temporary ‘hybrid’ proceedings, in which MPs could take part in oral questions and statements – including Urgent Questions – virtually or in person. MPs were also able to participate virtually or in person in substantive proceedings under these temporary arrangements. Work was undertaken to ensure that social distancing could be maintained in the Commons chamber. These moves reflected the severity of the pandemic in the spring. Some divisions were held remotely, using virtual technology, for the first time in the Commons’ history. However, before the Commons’ May recess, the government decided not to extend these temporary arrangements, meaning that they lapsed on 20 May. MPs then returned to the Commons, after their recess, on 2 June. The House agreed to allow 1 MPs unable to attend parliament for medical reasons to participate remotely in questions and statements – though they cannot participate remotely in debates on legislation. The government’s reluctance to move back to hybrid proceedings, combined with the continued need for social distancing, meant that that divisions had to take place in the chamber, with MPs forming a long queue through the parliamentary estate to vote. Many MPs were angry about this – as well as about the inability of MPs to vote remotely if they were unable to attend the House in person. Eventually, on 10 June, the proxy voting system was expanded to include MPs unable to attend the House for medical or public health reasons. Around 170 MPs have made use of proxies. There is still no provision for MPs unable to attend the chamber for medical reasons to take part in debates on legislation. These arrangements were subsequently renewed in July, September, and October – and are due to remain in place until 30 March 2021. Outside of the main chamber, Commons select committees have also been conducting their business, including evidence sessions, through a mixture of in-person and remote working. This has made it easier for committees to meet during recesses. The Lords As in the Commons, the Lords rose earlier than planned for its Easter recess in March. By this point, the House had also acted to bar visitors, and the Lord Speaker, Lord Fowler, had announced his intention to work remotely. On 25 March, the House also decided to reduced its sittings to Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays, and to delay certain kinds of business until at least late May. Throughout the Easter recess, in late March and early April, authorities in the Lords worked to enable some kinds of business, such as oral questions, to be done virtually. Peers were also encouraged to work from home where possible. The House returned from recess on 21 April and decided to enable virtual proceedings beginning on the same day. Within a few days, all forms of business were being carried out virtually (though they were not broadcast live until 28 April, for technical reasons). Throughout April and May, more forms of business were conducted remotely, including debates on primary and secondary legislation. Peers also agreed to temporarily change their allowances, so that peers speaking in a virtual debate can claim £162 a day (roughly half the usual daily allowance). In June, the House decided to move to hybrid proceedings, with up to 30 peers being allowed in the chamber at any one time. At the same time, remote voting was introduced, with the first remote vote taking place on 15 June. On 30 September, remote divisions had to briefly be cancelled, due to failure of the online voting system. Outside of the chamber, many Lords committees have been conducting hybrid or remote evidence sessions. Could parliament be shut due to the coronavirus? [7] This is very unlikely. At no point so far has parliament closed due to the pandemic. Although both Houses did take a slightly extended Easter recess in March, parliament has otherwise continued to undertake its work. The bigger question facing the government, parliamentary authorities, MPs, and peers is how to ensure that both Houses can continue to play their role in a safe and effective way. In their decision making, the government and parliamentary authorities are balancing a number of factors, including the health of all those in parliament; parliament’s role in ensuring government accountability and facilitating debate; and the need to pass or renew specific legislation, including on emergency measures relating to the coronavirus. What are some of the benefits and drawbacks of hybrid and virtual proceedings? [8] In responding to the pandemic, MPs and peers are having to consider a range of factors: the health and safety of members and staff; the ability of parliament to effectively fulfil its constitutional role; and the ability of all MPs and peers to contribute. Consequently, there has been some disagreement about different ways of working. In-person, virtual, and hybrid systems all have benefits and drawbacks. Operating solely in person runs the risk of spreading the virus throughout members and staff. This might also prevent members and staff with serious underlying health conditions from doing their job, meaning that some constituents could go unrepresented. Even if social distancing guidelines were adhered to, this would limit the number of MPs and peers able to participate at any one time in proceedings, and mean that votes would take much longer than usual. At the same time, some argue that the quality of debate and scrutiny during in-person proceedings is greater, because there is a more natural back-and-forth between members, and less interruption due to technological problems. A further benefit of parliament meeting in person is the ability of MPs and peers to hold informal conversations around the parliamentary estate, which can be an important means of raising issues.
Recommended publications
  • The European Parliament and Environmental Legislation: the Case of Chemicals
    European Journal of Political Research 36: 119–154, 1999. 119 © 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. The European Parliament and environmental legislation: The case of chemicals GEORGE TSEBELIS & ANASTASSIOS KALANDRAKIS University of California, Los Angeles, USA Abstract. The paper studies the impact of the EP on legislation on chemical pollutants in- troduced under the Cooperation procedure. A series of formal and informal analyses have predicted from significant impact of the EP, to limited impact (only in the second round) to no impact at all. Through the analysis of Parliamentary debates as well as Commission and Parliamentary committee documents, we are able to assess the significance of different amendments, as well as the degree to which they were introduced in the final decision of the Council. Our analysis indicates first that less than 30% of EP amendments are insignificant, while 15% are important or very important; second, that the probability of acceptance of an amendment is the same regardless of its significance. Further analysis indicates two sources of bias of aggregate EP statistics: several amendments are complementary (deal with the same issue in different places of the legal document), and a series of amendments that are rejected as inadmissible (because they violate the legal basis of the document or the germainess require- ment) are included in subsequent pieces of legislation. We calculate the effect of these biases in our sample, and find that official statistics underestimate Parliamentary influence by more than 6 percentage points (49% instead of 56% in our sample). Finally, we compare a series of observed strategic behaviors of different actors (rapporteurs, committees, floor, Commission) to different expectations generated by the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Icelandic Federalist Papers
    The Icelandic Federalist Papers No. 16: The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles To the People of Iceland: Before examining the republican character of the new plan, it is first necessary to explain the meanings of the terms and their relevance to the standards fixed in Iceland. The term republic originates from Latin “res publica,” “the common weal, a commonwealth, state, republic,” liter- ally res publica “public interest, the state,” from res “affair, matter, thing” combined with publi- ca, feminine of publicus or “public.”1 From a constitutional perspective, a republic is a country in which the head of state’s position is not hereditary.2 The president (or other chief executive) may be elected, appointed, or nominated to exercise the head of state position. This concept is the opposite of a kingdom, in which a monarch exercises power because of filiation. Historically, the term “republic” was first used in ancient Rome and thereafter where power was not exercised by a royal family, as for example in the case of Venice. The term may refer to a system that is neither monarchical nor imperial. A republic does not necessarily mean democracy since the president may be designated through authority; there are many examples of undemocratic republics among Latin American dictatorships or in the former USSR. The founda- tions of a republic are based on a will, a desire to represent the social body. It also has a norma- tive meaning connected to a judgment of values and the possibility for people to exercise their sovereignty. Even though the idea of both democracy and constitutional government emerged in Athens, the first known city republic took shape around 506 BC in India where, for the first time, a ruler was elected.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament and the House of Commons
    PEOPLE EVENTS PARLIAMENT AND THE PLACES HOUSE OF COMMONS Parliament and democracy OPPOSITION DAYS Parliament is made up of three parts: The House of Opposition days allow the Commons, the House of Lords and the Sovereign. opposition parties in the House of In the House of Commons, Members of Parliament (MPs) are elected Commons to as part of the democratic process. Following a general election, the determine the topic for debate political party with the most MPs forms the Government. rather than the Government. There Members of the House of Lords are mostly appointed by the are usually about Sovereign on the recommendation of the Prime Minister; some are 20 opposition days in a parliamentary internally elected. A small number of Church of England archbishops session, with the and bishops are also Members. Offi cial Opposition party being The Sovereign fulfi ls a formal and ceremonial role, approving Royal allocated 17 days. Assent for bills and attending the State Opening of Parliament. THE RIGHT TO VOTE Parliament and UK citizens over the Government age of 18 can vote Parliament and Government are After a general election, the in parliamentary separate institutions. They work party leader who commands elections. closely together but have distinct a majority in the House of roles. Commons, is asked to form a Government by the Sovereign The Government is responsible and is appointed Prime Minister. for running the country, This MP is usually the leader of implementing policy and drafting the largest political party. laws. Parliament is responsible for checking the Government’s The Prime Minister recommends work, making and amending ministers for formal appointment laws and representing the people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of a Member of Parliament
    Queensland Parliament Factsheet The Role of a Member of Parliament Performing many different roles in large electorates can spend a lot of time travelling within their electorate. Each member The role of a Member of Parliament (MP) is a has an office in their electorate, and those with multi-functional one. They have a responsibility the largest electorates have two. Constituents to three primary groups in their capacity as: often bring their concerns to their local Member • the elected representative of an electorate of Parliament. Personal intervention in a constituent matter by a Member may result in • a Member of Parliament and priority attention from government departments. • a Member of a particular political party If a matter is particularly urgent or serious, the (the exception being for Independents). Member may approach the relevant Minister Many Members also work on parliamentary directly, or may even bring the matter before the committees, which examine the Parliament by asking a question of the responsible Government’s actions in detail. Up to 19 Minister. The Member may also sponsor a petition of the 93 Members may be Ministers. This about the issue in question. includes the Premier who is the leader of the Government. Working in the Parliament Members’ parliamentary functions may include: Working in the electorate www.parliament.qld.gov.au • enacting and debating proposed new Members of Parliament are the representatives of legislation W all of the constituents in their electorate. Their • scrutinising the actions of the
    [Show full text]
  • The British Parliament-House of Commons Page 01
    THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT-HOUSE OF COMMONS PAGE 01 Table of Contents 1. Letter from the Chair 2. Introduction 3. Members of the Parliament (Delegate expectations) 4. Special procedure Topic: Counter terrorism in Great Britain a. History of terrorism in the United Kingdom b. Threat of terrorism at Home c. Role and Scope of the Security Agencies d. Border Security and Migrant Crisis 6. QARMAs 7. Recommended bibliography 8. References GOING BEYOND PAGE 2 1. Letter from the Chair. Dear Members of Parliament, It is our honour to welcome you to EAFITMUN and to the committee. We are Eduardo Tisnes Zapata, law student at EAFIT University and Federico Freydell Mesa, law student at El Rosario University, and we will be chairing EAFITMUN’s House of Commons. The last few years, have put this House under pressure for reasons involving the exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union, overseas and domestic terrorism and security crises; the flow of migrants from the Middle East and Africa and the lack of political consensus between the Government and the Opposition. The challenges you will face in the committee will not only require from you background academic knowledge, but they will demand your best abilities to negotiate between parties and to propose solutions that work best for the British people, meeting halfway and reaching across the House. As it is obvious we cannot have 650 MPs, therefore we will try to reproduce the Commons’ majorities and parties representation in the House. Nevertheless, no party will hold an overall majority, making solution and policymaking more challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876
    c i e AT 4 of 1876 THE TYNWALD PROCEEDINGS ACT 1876 The Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876 Index c i e THE TYNWALD PROCEEDINGS ACT 1876 Index Section Page 1 Short title .......................................................................................................................... 5 2 Interpretation of terms ................................................................................................... 5 3 Summons of witnesses, etc ............................................................................................ 6 4 Examination of witnesses on oath ................................................................................ 6 5 Punishment of contempt ................................................................................................ 6 6 Punishment of libel ......................................................................................................... 6 6A Matters within the exclusive cognisance of Tynwald Court or the Branches ........ 7 6B Privileges and immunities in connection with proceedings in Tynwald Court or the Branches ..................................................................................................... 7 7 Prosecutions ..................................................................................................................... 8 8 Payment of costs by promoters of private bill ............................................................ 8 9 Payment of costs by opponent of a private bill Payment of costs in cases of appeal to Court...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10 Principles for Parliamentary Assistance
    II.10. PRINCIPLES FOR PARLIAMENTARY ASSISTANCE – 111 Chapter 10 Principles for parliamentary assistance These principles were prepared by Greg Power, Director of Global Partners & Associates for the OECD/DAC/GOVNET and presented to the Fourth Annual Donor Co-ordination Meeting on Parliamentary Support and the 16th Plenary Meeting of the OECD/DAC Network on Governance on 24-25 April 2012. ACCOUNTABILITY AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE: ORIENTATIONS AND PRINCIPLES FOR DEVELOPMENT © OECD 2014 112 – II.10. PRINCIPLES FOR PARLIAMENTARY ASSISTANCE Parliaments perform a vital role in any system of representative democracy, but they play an especially important role in emerging democracies – not only in improving the quality of governance by ensuring transparency and accountability, but also in shaping the public’s expectations and attitudes to democracy. Parliaments are the single most important institution in overseeing government activity, scrutinising legislation and representing the public’s concerns to those in power. Their performance in holding government to account and engaging with voters will help to establish the norms and values in the early years of a democratic culture. Although traditionally a small part of international support programmes, donors have paid greater attention to the role of parliaments in the last decade or so. Most support programmes usually seek to improve the effectiveness of the institution in one of their three key functions: 1. Legislation: Assessment of the legislative function will be concerned with how well parliament scrutinises and amends bills, or whether it instead simply acts as a rubber-stamp for the executive. 2. Oversight: Parliamentary oversight is the main means by which government is held to account; parliaments should ensure government departments are run efficiently and that ministers are regularly called to account for their actions, policies and spending.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unicameral Legislature
    Citizens Research Council of Michigan Council 810 FARWELL BUILDING -- DETROIT 26 204 BAUCH BUILDING -- LANSING 23 Comments Number 706 FORMERLY BUREAU OF GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH February 18, 1960 THE UNICAMERAL LEGISLATURE By Charles W. Shull, Ph. D. Recurrence of the suggestion of a single-house legislature for Michigan centers attention upon the narrowness of choice in terms of the number of legislative chambers. Where representative assemblies exist today, they are either composed of two houses and are called bicameral, or they possess but a single unit and are known as unicameral. The Congress of the United States has two branches – the Senate and the House of Representatives. All but one of the present state legislatures – that of Nebraska – are bicameral. On the other hand, only a handful of municipal councils or county boards retain the two-chambered pattern. This has not always been the case. The colonial legislatures of Delaware, Georgia, and Pennsylvania were single- chambered or unicameral; Vermont came into the United States of America with a one-house lawmaking assem- bly, having largely formed her Constitution of 1777 upon the basis of that of Pennsylvania. Early city councils in America diversely copied the so-called “federal analogy” of two-chambers rather extensively in the formative days of municipal governmental institutions. The American Revolution of 1776 served as a turning point in our experimentation with state legislative struc- ture. Shortly after the Declaration of Independence, Delaware and Georgia changed from the single-chamber type of British colony days to the alternate bicameral form, leaving Pennsylvania and its imitator Vermont main- taining single-house legislatures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliament in the Time of Coronavirus Sweden
    Foundation The Parliament in the time of coronavirus | Robert | Schuman Robert Study Sweden The Swedish Parliament and the pandemic | 2 The Covid-19 pandemic and the Swedish Parliament: how to make use of a flexible constitutional framework Patricia Jonason*, Thomas Larue* *Associate Professor in Public Law, Södertörn University *Ph.D. in Political Science and Director of the Riksdag’s Evaluation and Research Secretary (ERS) The Covid 19 pandemic has impacted the whole Swedish society, including the Swedish Parliament (Riksdag). Indeed, in a country where no specific constitutional framework for civil crisis is in place, it has been necessary to carry out organisational adjustments concerning the physical presence of the MPs and the voting procedure in order to enable well-functioning of the Riksdag during the pandemic (1). Additionally, for addressing the need of the organs of the State to act rapidly, a wider delegation of regulatory power from the Parliament to the Government was introduced (2) and the law-making process was shortened (3). Finally, the scrutinizing function of the Swedish Parliament was impacted. Indeed, the Committee on the Constitution’s annual examination of the Government’s handling was temporarily postponed during Spring 2020 and the Committee initiated a specific review of the Government’s management of the Covid 19 crisis (4). 1. Adjusting routines for voting in Chamber and working in Committees On March 16, 2020 the so-called group leaders of all eight party groups (i.e. parties) agreed that only 55 members should be physically present when voting in the Parliament Chamber. The decision only applied to voting procedure where normally no quorum rule exists in the Riksdag.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Parliaments in Regulatory Policy
    Évaluation et qualité de la législation: Quel rôle pour les parlements? Paris, le 5 décembre 2013 Christer Åström, chef de secrétariat Secrétariat des évaluations et des recherches Division des services des commissions parlementaires Sveriges Riksdag – Le parlement suédois A constitutional obligation • 2001: The Riksdag Act • 2001: Riksdag Guidelines • 2006: Riksdag Guidelines • 2011: The Instrument of Government: “Each committee follows up and evaluates decisions of the Riksdag within the committee’s subject area.” The role of Parliament • Parliament is a crucial link and a key actor in the democratic chain of governance. • The key tasks of the Swedish Riksdag: adopt laws, decide on central government expenditure and revenue, and examine the way in which the Government and public agencies perform their duties. • Ex ante impact assessments of laws are primarily conducted by Government committees of inquiry and public authorities. • Ex post evaluations are conducted by Riksdag committees, the National Audit Office, public authorities and Government committees of inquiry. Parliamentary evaluations • Each parliamentary committee is responsible for evaluating decisions taken by Parliament, e.g. decisions on new laws • Evaluation is a way of obtaining information about results and creating more robust links with Parliament’s legislative decisions • Evaluations have a forward-looking approach • Evaluations provide a basis for solidly-based positions in committee deliberations • Evaluations are carried out partly through thematic in-depth evaluations,
    [Show full text]
  • Two Houses of Parliament
    T H E T WO H O U S E S : Exterior of Central Hall of Parliament House P OW E R S A N D R E L AT I O N S H I P ut for a few exceptions, both Houses territory of India. Such a resolution remains of Parliament enjoy similar powers in force for a maximum period of one year but Band status under the Constitution. In this period can be extended by one year at a certain spheres, however, each House has been time by passing a further resolution. given some special powers which are not Again, under article 312 of the available to the other. Distribution of such Constitution, if Rajya Sabha passes a powers is based mainly on the nature and resolution by a majority of not less than two- composition of the House. thirds of the members present and voting Special Powers of Rajya Sabha declaring that it is necessary or expedient in the national interest to create one or more All Rajya Sabha which represents the States, India Services common to the Union and the enjoys certain special powers under the States, Parliament has the power to create by Constitution. Article 249 of the Constitution law such services. provides that Rajya Sabha may pass a resolution, by a majority of not less than two- Under the Constitution, President is thirds of the members present and voting, to empowered to issue Proclamations in the the effect that it is necessary or expedient in the event of national emergency (article 352), in national interest that Parliament should make a the event of failure of constitutional law with respect to any matter enumerated in machinery in a State (article 356), or in the the State List.
    [Show full text]
  • Bicameralism
    Bicameralism International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 2 Bicameralism International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 2 Elliot Bulmer © 2017 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) Second edition First published in 2014 by International IDEA International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribute-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/> International IDEA Strömsborg SE–103 34 Stockholm Sweden Telephone: +46 8 698 37 00 Email: [email protected] Website: <http://www.idea.int> Cover design: International IDEA Cover illustration: © 123RF, <http://www.123rf.com> Produced using Booktype: <https://booktype.pro> ISBN: 978-91-7671-107-1 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Advantages of bicameralism.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]