Magnetohydrodynamics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Magnetohydrodynamics Magnetohydrodynamics J.W.Haverkort April 2009 Abstract This summary of the basics of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) as- sumes the reader is acquainted with both fluid mechanics and electro- dynamics. The content is largely based on \An introduction to Magneto- hydrodynamics" by P.A. Davidson. The basic equations of electrodynam- ics are summarized, the assumptions underlying MHD are exposed and a selection of aspects of the theory are discussed. Contents 1 Electrodynamics 2 1.1 The governing equations . 2 1.2 Faraday's law . 2 2 Magnetohydrodynamical Equations 3 2.1 The assumptions . 3 2.2 The equations . 4 2.3 Some more equations . 4 3 Concepts of Magnetohydrodynamics 5 3.1 Analogies between fluid mechanics and MHD . 5 3.2 Dimensionless numbers . 6 3.3 Lorentz force . 7 1 1 Electrodynamics 1.1 The governing equations The Maxwell equations for the electric and magnetic fields E and B in vacuum are written in terms of the sources ρe (electric charge density) and J (electric current density) ρ r · E = e Gauss's law (1) "0 @B r × E = − Faraday's law (2) @t r · B = 0 No monopoles (3) @E r × B = µ J + µ " Ampere's law (4) 0 0 0 @t with "0 the electric permittivity and µ0 the magnetic permeability of free space. The electric field can be thought to consist of a static curl-free part Es = @A −∇V and an induced or in-stationary part Ei = − @t which is divergence-free, with V the electric potential and A the magnetic vector potential. The force on a charge q moving with velocity u is given by the Lorentz force f = q(E+u×B). Moving along with a charge, however, the force f = qEr is proportional to the relative electric field mEr so that one finds that non-relativistically the electric field transforms as Er = E + u × B where B = Br. Note that from f = qu × B one can see that the magnetic field is not a real vector, but a pseudo-vector: under a coordinate inversion x ! −x both F and u change sign so that B can not. In the continuum limit the Lorentz force per unit volume becomes F = ρeE + J × B (5) Due to collisions an applied force will only lead to a finite current density. Assuming a linear relationship yields Ohm's law: J = σEr = σ (E + u × B) (6) We conclude this summary of the basic equations of electrodynamics by noting that the divergence of Ampere's law yields the conservation of charge @ρ r · J = − e (7) @t and that by taking the divergence of Faraday's law (@=@t)(r · B) = 0 which, if true relative to all sets of axes moving uniformly relative to one another, yields r · B = 0. 1.2 Faraday's law For a closed curve C around a surface S, moving in space with a prescribed velocity u the surface area swept out by a line element dl of the curve is given by δS = dl0 × dl = (u × dl)δt where dl0 = uδt is the infinitesimal displacement of the element dl in a time δt. Therefore for any solenoidal vector field G Z Z @G I δ G · dS = δt · dS − u × G · δtdl (8) S S @t C 2 such that with Stoke's theorem it follows that d Z Z @G G · dS = − r × (u × G) · dS (9) dt S S @t This mathematical identity shows that the flux of G through the surface S can change either due to a change in G itself or due to a change in the surface area of S. Its physical relevance is that whenever a vector field obeys the transport equation @G=@t = r × (u × G) the flux through any material surface, i.e. moving along with the fluid, is conserved. It also allows us to rewrite Faraday's law to integral form, by adding r × (u × B) to both sides of Eq. 2 to yield H (E + u × B) · dl = −(d=dt) R B · dS or, using the definition H C S e.m.f.≡ C Er · dl: I d Z e.m.f = Er · dl = − B · dS (10) C dt S Somewhat hidden in Faradays law thus lies the information that the e.m.f. in a closed loop can change either due to a time-varying magnetic field, transformer e.m.f. due to Faraday's law, or through a change in the surface area of the loop, motional e.m.f due to the way the electric field transforms. 2 Magnetohydrodynamical Equations 2.1 The assumptions Taking the divergence of Ohm's law, Eq. 6, using conservation of Charge, Eq. 7, and inserting Gauss's law, Eq. 1 yields @ρe ρe + + σr · (u × B) = 0 with τe = "0/σ (11) @t τe In a stationary conductor the charge density will therefore exponentially decay with a characteristic time-scale τe = "0/σ, which for a typical conductor is −18 τe ∼ 10 s. If one is not interested in these very small time-scales, @ρe=@t can thus be neglected. Note that in steady state a moving conductor can maintain a small electric charge by magnetic forces: ρe = −"0r · (u × B) = "0(u · r × B − (r × u) · B) (12) Where use has been made of a vector relation. Using Ampere's law and Ohm's law yields ρe u · E = u · µ0J − ! · B = − ! · B (13) "0 λ with λ = 1/µ0σ the `magnetic diffusivity' and ! ≡ r × u the fluid vorticity. From Eq. 12 ρe ∼ "0uB=l, while Ohm's law implies that usually E ∼ J/σ. We thus find for electric forces relative to magnetic forces ρeE=JB ∼ uτe=l, which again involves the extremely small number τe. Assuming the characteris- tic length scale l corresponding to r · (u × B) is not too small, the electric force can therfore safely be neglected in the Lorentz force. This however does not mean that the presence of electric volume charges can be neglected altogether. 3 In the dynamics of the electric current density as stated by Ohm's law it plays a significant role, i.e. through the the electric field it produces. Through the −12 smallness of "0 = 8:85 · 10 F/m a small charge can already create a signifi- cant divergence in the electric field that can act to prevent magnetic forces from creating a divergence in the current density, i.e. a change in the charge density. Because the current density directly enters the Lorentz force, volume charges can indirectly have an impact on the flow. Their direct influence via the Lorentz force, however, can be safely neglected in magnetohydrodynamics. In a similar way we can do without the displacement current term in Ampere's law (the µ0"0@E=@t term) because by Ohm's law this term is ∼ µ0τe@J=@t. Again, when we are not interested in the very small time-scales associated with charge equilibration: µ0τe@J=@t ∼ µ0τe@(u × B)=@t µ0J we can neglect the displacement current. To summarize the assumptions behind magnetohydrody- namical theory: 1. One is not interested in the very small time-scales τe = "0/σ of charge equilibration such that @ρe=@t is neglected from the conservation of charge 2. The characteristic length-scale l corresponding to r · (u × B) is assumed to be large enough such that ρeE=JB ∼ uτe=l 1 and the electric force can be neglected in the Lorentz force 3. The current density J = σ(E+u×B) varies on the equilibration time-scale τe due to the fast dynamics of the electric field E and on much longer time- scales due to the `macroscopic' time-scales associated with the magnetic part u × B. One neglects the fast dynamics µ0"0@E=@t ∼ µ0τe@J=@t µ0J such that the displacement current can be neglected in Ampere's law 2.2 The equations The equations of magnetohydrodynamics thus contain the reduced Maxwell equations @B r × B = µ J and r × E = − with r · B = 0 (14) 0 @t and the Lorentz force density F = J × B which is added as a body force to the Navier-Stokes equations for a Newtonian fluid Du = −∇(p/ρ) + νr2u + J × B/ρ (15) Dt 2.3 Some more equations Inserting Ohm's law and the reduced Ampere's equation into Faraday's equa- tion: @B = −∇ × E = −∇ × (J/σ − u × B) = r × (u × B − r × B/µ σ) (16) @t 0 2 With r · B = 0 we have r × r × B = −∇ B yielding, with λ = 1/σµ0 the magnetic diffusivity, the `induction equation' 4 @B = r × (u × B) + λr2B (17) @t Note the striking similarity with the vorticity equation: @! = r × (u × !) + νr2! + r × (J × B)/ρ (18) @t We can therefore draw an analogy between the dynamics of the vorticity ! = r × u and the magnetic field B = r × A or similarly between the fluid velocity u and the magnetic vector potential A. If we `uncurl' Eq. 16 or Eq. 17 we get an equation equation for A very similar to the Navier-Stokes equations: @A = −∇φ + λr2A + u × (r × A) (19) @t 3 Concepts of Magnetohydrodynamics 3.1 Analogies between fluid mechanics and MHD Note that the analogy between ! and B is not perfect, both by the occurrence of a source term in the vorticity equation which is absent in the induction equa- tion, and by the fact that the vorticity is functionally related to u in a way that B is not. Furthermore through the fluid velocity u the dynamics of ! and B is usually coupled. Alternatively through the Lorentz force in the Navier-Stokes equations and the magnetic part in Ohm's law the dynamics of u and B is coupled.
Recommended publications
  • Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics: II. Magnetohydrodynamics
    Winter School on Computational Astrophysics, Shanghai, 2018/01/30 Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics: II. Magnetohydrodynamics Xuening Bai (白雪宁) Institute for Advanced Study (IASTU) & Tsinghua Center for Astrophysics (THCA) source: J. Stone Outline n Astrophysical fluids as plasmas n The MHD formulation n Conservation laws and physical interpretation n Generalized Ohm’s law, and limitations of MHD n MHD waves n MHD shocks and discontinuities n MHD instabilities (examples) 2 Outline n Astrophysical fluids as plasmas n The MHD formulation n Conservation laws and physical interpretation n Generalized Ohm’s law, and limitations of MHD n MHD waves n MHD shocks and discontinuities n MHD instabilities (examples) 3 What is a plasma? Plasma is a state of matter comprising of fully/partially ionized gas. Lightening The restless Sun Crab nebula A plasma is generally quasi-neutral and exhibits collective behavior. Net charge density averages particles interact with each other to zero on relevant scales at long-range through electro- (i.e., Debye length). magnetic fields (plasma waves). 4 Why plasma astrophysics? n More than 99.9% of observable matter in the universe is plasma. n Magnetic fields play vital roles in many astrophysical processes. n Plasma astrophysics allows the study of plasma phenomena at extreme regions of parameter space that are in general inaccessible in the laboratory. 5 Heliophysics and space weather l Solar physics (including flares, coronal mass ejection) l Interaction between the solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere l Heliospheric
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetohydrodynamics
    MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS International Max-Planck Research School. Lindau, 9{13 October 2006 {4{ Bulletin of exercises n◦4: The magnetic induction equation. 1. The induction equation: Starting from Faraday's law and Ampere's law (neglecting the displacement current) and making use of Ohm's constitutive relation, eliminate the electric field and the current density to obtain the inducion equation for a plasma in the MHD approximation: @B c2 = rot (v B) rot rot B : (1) @t ^ − 4πσe ! Show that if the electrical conductivity is uniform, the induction equation can be cast into the form @B = rot (v B) + η 2 B ; (2) @t ^ r def 2 where η = c =(4πσe) is the \magnetic diffusivity." 2. Combined form of the induction and the continuity equations. Show that the induction equation can be combined with the equation of continuity into one single differential equation which gives the time evolution of B/ρ following a fluid element, viz: D B B 1 = v rot (η rot B) : (3) D t ρ ! ρ · r! − ρ In the case of an ideal MHD-plasma, Eq. (3) simplifies to a form known as Wal´en's equation. 3. Strength of a magnetic flux tube. A magnetic flux tube is the region enclosed by the surface determined by all magnetic field lines passing through a given material circuit Ct . The \strength" of a flux tube is defined as the circulation of the potential vector A along the material circuit Ct , viz. ξ def def 2 Φm(t) = A d α = A[α(ξ; t)] α0(ξ; t) d ξ ; (4) ICt · Zξ1 · where α = α(ξ; t) is the parametric expression of the circuit Ct .
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulent Dynamos: Experiments, Nonlinear Saturation of the Magnetic field and field Reversals
    Turbulent dynamos: Experiments, nonlinear saturation of the magnetic field and field reversals C. Gissinger & C. Guervilly November 17, 2008 1 Introduction Magnetic fields are present at almost all scales in the universe, from the Earth (roughly 0:5 G) to the Galaxy (10−6 G). It is commonly believed that these magnetic fields are generated by dynamo action i.e. by the turbulent flow of an electrically conducting fluid [12]. Despite this space and time disorganized flow, the magnetic field shows in general a coherent part at the largest scales. The question arising from this observation is the role of the mean flow: Cowling first proposed that the coherent magnetic field could be due to coherent large scale velocity field and this problem is still an open question. 2 MHD equations and dimensionless parameters The equations describing the evolution of a magnetohydrodynamical system are the equation of Navier-Stokes coupled to the induction equation: @v 1 + (v )v = π + ν∆v + f + (B )B ; (1) @t · r −∇ µρ · r @B = (v B) + η ∆B : (2) @t r × × where v is the solenoidal velocity field, B the solenoidal magnetic field, π the pressure r gradient in the fluid, ν the kinematic viscosity, f a forcing term, µ the magnetic permeabil- ity, ρ the fluid density and η the magnetic permeability. Dealing with the geodynamo, the minimal set of parameters for the outer core are : ρ : density of the fluid • µ : magnetic permeability • 54 ν : kinematic diffusivity • σ: conductivity • R : radius of the outer core • V : typical velocity • Ω : rotation rate • The problem involves 7 independent parameters and 4 fundamental units (length L, time T , mass M and electic current A).
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Wind Interaction with the Terrestrial Magnetosphere
    2002:316 CIV MASTER’S THESIS Solar Wind Interaction with the Terrestrial Magnetosphere LARS G WESTERBERG MASTER OF SCIENCE PROGRAMME Department of Applied Physics and Mechanical Engineering Division of Fluid Mechanics 2002:316 CIV • ISSN: 1402 - 1617 • ISRN: LTU - EX - - 02/316 - - SE SOLAR WIND INTERACTION WITH THE TERRESTRIAL MAGNETOSPHERE Preface This thesis work is done at the Division of Fluid Mechanics, Luleå University of Technology. I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Hans O. Åkerstedt for his great support and valuable assistance during this project. I would also like to thank all people who have helped and encouraged me throughout the years. i SOLAR WIND INTERACTION WITH THE TERRESTRIAL MAGNETOSPHERE Sammanfattning En studie av strömningen av solvinden kring jordens magnetosfär är gjord. Som förenklad modell används en plan magnetopaus i två dimensioner med stagnationspunkt i ekvatorsplanet. Den teoretiska analysen är gjord genom ordinär störningsräkning. Aktuella samband är härledda ur Navier-Stokes ekvation och MHD ekvationer. En process av speciellt intresse är magnetisk återkoppling. Genom att använda störningsmodellen kan vi göra en analys av gränsskiktet i närhet till den punkt där återkoppling sker. Förutom teoretisk analys används numerisk analys för att lösa partiella differentialekvationer beskrivande strömningen av solvinden kring magnetopausen. Metoden som används är Chebyshev’s kollokationsmetod. Det visar sig att gränsskiktet norr om återkopplingspunkten är tunnare än söder om densamma. Förutsättningen för att stationär återkoppling skall kunna äga rum, är att hastigheten i återkopplingspunkten är mindre än Alfvénhastigheten. Detta får till följd att området kring magnetopausen där vi kan ha stationär återkoppling är begränsat. Hastigheten uppnår Alfvénhastigheten på ett avstånd av ungefär tio jordradier längs magnetopausen.
    [Show full text]
  • Mean-Field Dynamo Model in Anisotropic Uniform Turbulent Flow with Short-Time Correlations
    galaxies Article Mean-Field Dynamo Model in Anisotropic Uniform Turbulent Flow with Short-Time Correlations E. V. Yushkov 1,2,3,* , R. Allahverdiyev 4 and D. D. Sokoloff 1,3,5 1 Department of Physics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia; [email protected] 2 Space Research Institute RAS (IKI), Moscow 117997, Russia 3 Moscow Center of Fundamental and Applied Mathematics, Moscow 119991, Russia 4 Department of Physics, Moscow State University, Branch in Baku, Baku AZ 1143, Azerbaijan; [email protected] 5 IZMIRAN, Troitsk 142191, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +7-(916)-774-52-72 Received: 2 August 2020; Accepted: 14 September 2020; Published: 19 September 2020 Abstract: The mean-field model is one of the basic models of the dynamo theory, which describes the magnetic field generation in a turbulent astrophysical plasma. The first mean-field equations were obtained by Steenbeck, Krause and Rädler for two-scale turbulence under isotropy and uniformity assumptions. In this article we develop the path integral approach to obtain mean-field equations fora short-correlated random velocity field in anisotropic streams. By this model we analyse effects of anisotropy and show the relation between dynamo growth and anisotropic tensors of helicity/turbulent diffusivity. Considering particular examples and comparing results with isotropic cases we demonstrate several mean-field effects: super-exponential growth at initial times, complex dependence of harmonics growth on the helicity tensor structure, when generation is possible for near-zero component or near-zero helicity trace, increase of the averaged magnetic field inclined to the initial current density that leads to effective Lorentz back-reaction and violation of force-free conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title A Numerical Investigation of Moderate Magnetic Reynolds Number Fusion Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamic Flows Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6373r5xw Author Kawczynski, Charles Newlin Publication Date 2018 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6373r5xw#supplemental Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles A Numerical Investigation of Moderate Magnetic Reynolds Number Fusion Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamic Flows A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering by Charles Newlin Kawczynski 2018 © Copyright by Charles Newlin Kawczynski 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION A Numerical Investigation of Moderate Magnetic Reynolds Number Fusion Liquid Metal Magnetohydrodynamic Flows by Charles Newlin Kawczynski Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Mohamed A. Abdou, Chair In this study, mathematical and numerical methodologies are developed, and an induction- based incompressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flow solver was created, to study mod- erate Rem liquid metal (LM) MHD flows for fusion blanket design. Most LM MHD flow numerical studies in fusion blanket design have traditionally assumed that the magnetic Reynolds number (Rem) is much less than unity. The Rem, a dimensionless parameter in the magnetic induction equation, is a measure of the ratio of convection to diffusion of the magnetic field (B). The low Rem approximation, also known as the inductionless or quasi- static approximation, assumes that the applied magnetic field is quasi-static and that the ratio of induced to applied magnetic field strength is much less than unity.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Fields in the Universe
    Magnetic Fields in the Universe Kandaswamy Subramanian Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007 Abstract The origin and maintenance of large scale magnetic fields in the Universe is discussed. A popular idea is that cosmic batteries generate seed magnetic fields which were amplified by magnetic induction due to turbulent motions, at times combined with differential rotation. We outline a seed field mechanism, the Biermann battery and then consider some basic ideas behind both small and large-scale turbulent dynamos. The small-scale dynamo may help understand magnetism in galaxy clusters and young galaxies, while the large-scale dynamo is important for the generation of fields with scales larger than stirring, as observed in nearby disk galaxies. Another intriguing possibility is that magnetic fields originated at some level from the early universe. Introduction The universe is magnetized. We all know that the Earth hosts a dipole magnetic field of order a Gauss which has been sustained for billions of years1 and allows us to navigate using the compass. Our Sun is also magnetized, with its poles reversing very regularly, every 11 years2,3. The magnetic field of the Earth and the Sun are discussed elsewhere in this volume. On larger scales, magnetic fields of order a few micro Gauss and ordered on scales of a few to ten kilo parsecs (kpc) are detected in disk galaxies4. Recall that a parsec is about 3 light years and thus although the strength of this field is about a million times smaller than the Earth’s magnetic field, it fills a very large volume and carries a substantial energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Essential Magnetohydrodynamics for Astrophysics
    Essential magnetohydrodynamics for astrophysics H.C. Spruit Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics henk@ mpa-garching.mpg.de v3.5.1, August 2017 The most recent version of this text, including small animations of elementary MHD pro- cesses, is located at http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/~henk/mhd12.zip (25 MB). Links To navigate the text, use the bookmarks bar of your pdf viewer, and/or the links highlighted in color. Links to pages, sections and equations are in blue, those to the animations red, external links such as urls in cyan. When using these links, you will need a way of returning to the location where you came from. This depends on your pdf viewer, which typically does not provide an html-style backbutton. On a Mac, the key combination cmd-[ works with Apple Preview and Skim, cmd-left-arrow with Acrobat. In Windows and Unix Acrobat has a way to add a back button to the menu bar. The appearance of the animations depends on the default video viewer of your system. On the Mac, the animation links work well with Acrobat Reader, Skim and with the default pdf viewer in the Latex distribution (tested with VLC and Quicktime Player), but not with Apple preview. i Contents 1. Essentials2 1.1. Equations . .2 1.1.1. The MHD approximation . .2 1.1.2. Ideal MHD . .3 1.1.3. The induction equation . .4 1.1.4. Geometrical meaning of div B =0 ..................4 1.1.5. Electrical current . .5 1.1.6. Charge density . .6 1.1.7.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mathematical Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics
    Typeset in LATEX 2" July 11, 2018 A Mathematical Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics Omar Maj Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics, D-85748 Garching, Germany. e-mail: [email protected] 1 2 Contents Preamble 5 1 Basic elements of fluid dynamics7 1.1 Kinematics of fluids..................................7 1.2 Lagrangian trajectories and flow of a vector field..................8 1.3 Deformation tensor and vorticity........................... 19 1.4 Advective derivative and Reynolds transport theorem............... 22 1.5 Dynamics of fluids................................... 25 1.6 Relation to kinetic theory and closure........................ 29 1.7 Incompressible flows................................. 44 1.8 Equations of state, isentropic flows and vorticity.................. 45 1.9 Effects of Euler-type nonlinearities.......................... 46 2 Basic elements of classical electrodynamics 51 2.1 Maxwell's equations.................................. 51 2.2 Lorentz force and motion of an electrically charged particle............ 64 2.3 Basic mathematical results for electrodynamics................... 69 3 From multi-fluid models to magnetohydrodynamics 83 3.1 A model for multiple electrically charged fluids................... 83 3.2 Quasi-neutral limit................................... 88 3.3 From multi-fluid to a single-fluid model....................... 96 3.4 The Ohm's law for an electron-ion plasma...................... 100 3.5 The equations of magnetohydrodynamics...................... 104 4 Conservation laws in magnetohydrodynamics 109 4.1 Global conservation laws in resistive MHD..................... 109 4.2 Global conservation laws in ideal MHD....................... 113 4.3 Frozen-in law...................................... 116 4.4 Flux conservation................................... 120 4.5 Topology of the magnetic field............................ 124 4.6 Analogy with the vorticity of isentropic flows.................... 132 5 Basic processes in magnetohydrodynamics 135 5.1 Linear MHD waves.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 11: Basic Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD)
    Lecture 11: Basic MagnetoHydroDynamics (MHD) Outline 1 Motivation 2 Electromagnetic Equations 3 Plasma Equations 4 Frozen Fields 5 Cowling’s Antidynamo Theorem Why MHD in Solar Physics Synoptic Kitt Peak Magnetogram over 2 Solar Cycles Evolution of Small-Scale Fields in the Quiet Sun Electromagnetic Equations (SI units) Maxwell’s and Matter Equations Symbols D~ electric displacement r · D~ = ρ c ρc electric charge density ~ r · B = 0 H~ magnetic field vector @B~ r × E~ + = 0 c speed of light in vacuum @t ~j electric current density @D~ r × H~ − = ~j E~ electric field vector @t B~ magnetic induction D~ = E~ t time B~ = µH~ dielectric constant µ magnetic permeability Simplifications use vacuum values: = 0, µ = µ0 − 1 by definition: (0µ0) 2 = c eliminate D~ and H~ and rearrange Equations from before Simplified Equations ~ ~ ρc r · D = ρc r · E = 0 r · B~ = 0 r · B~ = 0 @B~ r × E~ + = 0 @B~ @t r × E~ = − @t @D~ r × H~ − = ~j 1 @E~ @t r × B~ = µ ~j + 0 c2 @t D~ = E~ B~ = µH~ Further Simplifications magnetic field generation by currents and changing electrical fields (displacement current) 1 @E~ r × B~ = µ ~j + 0 c2 @t Maxwell’s equations are relativistic non-relativistic MHD, i.e. v c where v typical velocity neglect displacement current (see exercises) ~ ~ r × B = µ0j r · r × B~ = 0 ) r ·~j = 0, no local charge accumulation, currents flow in closed circuits magnetic dominates over electrical energy density plasma is neutral, i.e. ρc = 0 Charge Neutrality electrically neutral plasma: n+ − n− n charge imbalance ρc = (n+ − n−)e from r · E~ = ρc
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ideal Gas Dynamics and MHD Dr Gordon Ogilvie Michaelmas Term 2008 1.1 Review of Ideal Gas Dynamics Provisional Synopsis 1.1.1 Fluid Variables
    Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics Mathematical Tripos, Part III 1 Ideal gas dynamics and MHD Dr Gordon Ogilvie Michaelmas Term 2008 1.1 Review of ideal gas dynamics Provisional synopsis 1.1.1 Fluid variables Equations of ideal gas dynamics and MHD, including compress- A fluid is characterized by a velocity field u(x, t) and two independent • ibility, thermodynamic relations and self-gravitation. Microphys- thermodynamic properties. Most useful are the dynamical variables: ical basis and validity of a fluid description. the pressure p(x, t) and the mass density ρ(x, t). Other properties, e.g. temperature T , can be regarded as functions of p and ρ. The specific Physical interpretation of MHD, with examples of basic phenom- • volume (volume per unit mass) is v = 1/ρ. ena. We neglect the possible complications of variable chemical composition Conservation laws, symmetries and hyperbolic structure. Stress • associated with ionization and recombination, or chemical or nuclear tensor and virial theorem. reactions. Linear waves in homogeneous media. • 1.1.2 Eulerian and Lagrangian viewpoints Nonlinear waves, shocks and other discontinuities. • Spherical blast waves: supernovae. In the Eulerian viewpoint we consider how fluid properties vary in time • at a point that is fixed in space, i.e. attached to the (usually inertial) Spherically symmetric steady flows: stellar winds and accretion. • coordinate system. The Eulerian time-derivative is simply ∂ Axisymmetric rotating magnetized flows: astrophysical jets. • ∂t Waves and instabilities in stratified rotating astrophysical bodies. • In the Lagrangian viewpoint we consider how fluid properties vary in time at a point that moves with the fluid. The Lagrangian time- derivative is then Please send any comments and corrections to [email protected] D ∂ = + u · ∇.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 2 Basic MHD Equations MHD = Magnetohydrodynamics
    Lecture 2 Basic MHD Equations MHD = Magnetohydrodynamics Maxwell’s Equation: v 1 ∂E v v v ρ : charge density ∇ × B = µj + 2 c ∂t v v v j : current density ∇ ⋅ B = 0 v ε = 8.854×10−12 Fm−1 magnetic permittivity v v ∂B 0 ∇ × E = − µ = 4π ×10−7 Hm−1 magnetic permeability ∂t 0 ∗ 1 v v ρ c = = 3×108 m / s speed of light ∇ ⋅ E = ε µ0ε 0 v v B H = µ If v << c non-relativistic v v D = εE Electric displaceme nt v v ∇× B = µvj kT 1 λ = ( ) 2 << l in plasma d 4πne2 scale v v OHM' s law : vj = σ (E + vv × B) v E in the frame of reference moving with plasma σ electric conductivity ohm m-1 A generalization of Ohm’s law e− p + 3-fluid model for , and neutral atom n ne n p v v v ∇pe me ∂j v vv vv 1 1 v v v nee(E0 + ) = ( + ∇ ⋅ (vj + jv) + + )Bj + j × B nee c ∂t Ωτ ei Ωτ en 2 f Ωτ in v v v v v + []∇Pe × B − ()j × B × B B v v v v E0 = E + v × B eB Ω = electron gyration frequency me 2 v v σ v v σf Ωτ in v v v If ignore electron inertia & σE0 = j + j × B − ( j × B)× B nee neeB pressure gradient: 2 −1 nee me σ = −1 −1 electron conductivity at B = 0 τ ei +τ en v v j // B: σ 0 E0 = j if v v v v σ 3 v v j ⊥ B: σ 3E0 = j + j × B nee σ σ = cowling conductivity 3 τ 1+ f 2 BΩ in nee v v v B× E vj = σ E +σ 0 Solve above equation 1 0 2 B σ σ B σ = 3 σ = 3 σ 1 B 2 1 2 nee 1+ (σ 3 ) nee If gas is fully ionized n =0 σ n e2τ a σ = σ = Ωτ σ σ = σ = e ei 1 2 2 2 ei 1 3 1+ Ω τ ei me v Compare to vj = σE v v There is an additional term normal to B and E , it is called Hall current Induction Equation v v Ohm’s Law: ∇× B = µvj v v v ∂B v v j v j v = −∇×(−vv × B + )
    [Show full text]