DOCSLIB.ORG

Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness Report from the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Initiative

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness Report from the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Initiative Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness Report from the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Initiative NCER 2008-2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness Report from the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Initiative July 2008 Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium NCER 2008-2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION This report was prepared for the National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, under contract numbers ED-01-CO-0039/0005 (Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.), ED- 01-CO-0052/0004 (RTI International), and ED-04-CO0076/0007 (Synergy Enterprises, Inc.). Disclaimer The opinions and positions expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the opinions and positions of the Institute of Education Sciences or the U.S. Department of Education. Any references within the document to specific education products are illustrative and do not imply endorsement of these products to the exclusion of other products that are not referenced. U.S. Department of Education Margaret Spellings Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Grover J. Whitehurst Director National Center for Education Research Lynn Okagaki Commissioner July 2008 This report is in the public domain. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium (2008). Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness (NCER 2008-2009). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. This report is available for download on the IES website at http://ncer.ed.gov. Alternative Formats On request, this publication can be made available in alternative formats, such as Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette. For more information, call the Alternative Format Center at (202) 205-8113. Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium1 Institute of Education Sciences (IES) University of California, Berkeley3 Caroline Ebanks Anne Cunningham Allen Ruby Marcia Davidson (RMC Research; University of Maine) Mathematica Policy Research (MPR), Inc. University of Missouri John Love Kathy R. Thornburg Sarah Avellar Wayne Mayfield Steve Glazerman Johnetta Morrison Susan Sprachman Jacqueline Scott RTI International University of North Carolina at Charlotte Ina Wallace Richard G. Lambert Randall Bender Martha Abbott-Shim (Quality Counts) Renate Houts University of New Hampshire Jun Liu Jeffrey S. Priest Melissa Raspa Leigh Zoellick Holly Rhodes University of North Florida Florida State University Cheryl Fountain Christopher J. Lonigan Madelaine Cosgrove Christopher Schatschneider Janice Wood Purdue University University of Texas Health Science Center Douglas Powell at Houston Nancy File (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) Susan Landry Success for All Foundation Michael Assel Bette Chambers Susan Gunnewig Robert Slavin Paul Swank University of California, Berkeley2 University of Virginia Prentice Starkey Laura Justice Alice Klein Khara Pence Douglas Clements (University at Buffalo, Alice Wiggins State University of New York) Vanderbilt University Julie Sarama (University at Buffalo, Dale Farran State University of New York) Mark Lipsey 1 The members of the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research (PCER) Consortium include the principal investigators and co- principal investigators from each of the 12 funded research projects, Institute of Education Sciences (IES) staff, and staff from RTI International (RTI) and Mathematica Policy Research (MPR), Inc., the evaluation contractors. 2 This University of California, Berkeley research team partnered with researchers at the University at Buffalo, State University of New York to evaluate the Pre-K Mathematics supplemented with DLM Early Childhood Express Math software curriculum in California and New York. 3 This University of California, Berkeley research team evaluated the Ready, Set, Leap! curriculum in New Jersey. iii Page intentionally left blank. Acknowledgments The findings reported here are based on research conducted by the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research (PCER) program research teams, the evaluation contractors, and Institute of Education Sciences (IES) staff. This report is a product of the collaborative efforts of the PCER Consortium. The PCER Consortium consists of research teams from each participating grantee site, IES staff, and the evaluation contractors: RTI International (RTI) and Mathematica Policy Research (MPR), Inc. Appendix B of the report was authored by Randall Bender (RTI), Jun Liu (RTI), Ina Wallace (RTI), Melissa Raspa (RTI), and Margaret Burchinal (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). The PCER Consortium would like to acknowledge Dr. Susan J. Kontos who served as the principal investigator for the Project Approach (Wisconsin) evaluation study from July 2002 to September 2003. Dr. Kontos, one of the country’s leading researchers in early childhood education and care, died September 12, 2003. We also acknowledge and thank Heidi Schweingruber and James Griffin for their contributions to the PCER program during their tenure at IES. We are grateful to the schools, teachers, parents, and the children who participated in our assessments, interviews, and observations. Without their cooperation, none of this research would have been possible. The listed authors represent only a part of the research team involved in this project. We would like to thank the research staff at each grantee site, especially the grantees’ site coordinators who worked closely with the local preschool programs, kindergarten school staff, and the contractors’ data collection teams to facilitate the successful collection of child-, parent-, teacher-, and classroom-level data. We appreciate the efforts of the classroom observers and the child assessors who were critical to the successful completion of data collection at each research site. We are also grateful to the many contractor staff members who have worked on data collection and data analysis tasks over the duration of the study. The mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations in the description of the projects, or the reporting of study findings, does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. v Page intentionally left blank. Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest The PCER Consortium consists of research teams (principal investigators and co-principal investigators from each grantee site), IES staff, and the evaluation contractors, Mathematica Policy Research (MPR), Inc. and RTI International (RTI). Most of the grantee research teams, IES staff, and contractor staff from MPR and RTI have no interests that could be affected by findings from the evaluation of the curricula that are highlighted in this report. It is important to note that four of the PCER initiative research teams developed curricula that were implemented at their respective research sites. The Success for All Foundation (SFA) developed the Curiosity Corner curriculum, which was implemented in preschool classrooms in Florida, Kansas, and New Jersey. Dr. Christopher Lonigan and his colleagues at Florida State University developed the Literacy Express curriculum, which was implemented in public pre-kindergarten classrooms in Florida. Drs. Prentice Starkey and Alice Klein are the developers of the Pre-K Mathematics curriculum. Drs. Douglas Clements and Julie Sarama are the developers of the DLM Early Childhood Express Math software. The Pre-K Mathematics curriculum and the DLM Early Childhood Express Math software were implemented jointly in Head Start and public pre-kindergarten classrooms in California and New York. Drs. Cheryl Fountain, Madelaine Cosgrove, and Janice Wood are on staff at the Florida Institute of Education, University of North Florida, where the Early Literacy and Learning Model (ELLM) was developed. These researchers were selected to receive funding for their PCER research projects in a competitive grant application process. Each research team implemented its curriculum and conducted site-specific analyses examining the effects of these curricula on child outcomes. RTI and MPR, the evaluation study contractors, conducted independent evaluations of these and the other treatment curricula that were included in the PCER study. The developers/implementers of these curricula did not conduct the impact analyses that are summarized in this report. Members of the RTI data analysis team completed the impact analyses. In addition to their role as developers and implementers, Drs. Starkey, Klein, Clements, Sarama, and Lonigan developed measures that were included in the PCER child assessment battery. Drs. Starkey and Klein developed a preschool mathematics assessment, the Child Math Assessment (CMA) that was adapted for use in the PCER evaluation study. The Child Math Assessment-Abbreviated (CMA-A) was added to the assessment battery as a measure of children’s early mathematical knowledge and skills using manipulative materials. The Building Blocks, Shape Composition task was also included in the child assessment battery. This task was adapted from the Building Blocks assessment tool, which was developed by Clements, Sarama, and Liu. The Elision subtest from the Preschool Comprehensive Test of Phonological and Print Processing (Pre- CTOPPP) was used in the pre-kindergarten year of the evaluation study. Dr. Christopher
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philosophy of Education Collection
    Philosophy of Education Collection Issue 23 / July-December of 2017 Print ISSN 1390-3861 / Electronic ISSN 1390-8626 UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA SALESIANA, ECUADOR SOPHIA, Collection of Philosophy of Education is a philosophical-scientific publication of the Salesian Polytechnic University (UPS), has a bi-annual periodicity, whose first number appeared in June of 2006. The objective of SOPHIA is to theorize the educa- tion from a philosophical point of view, with data from individual and collective psy- chology, teaching-learning experiences, sociology, culture and the development of the empirical sciences, to renew, update and better articulate the conceptual, procedural and experiential level of the education sciences. The journal promotes the dissemination of monographic articles that are unpublished, scientifically constructed, with a method that adequately articulates analysis and synthesis; that are propositive, in the nucleus of the Philosophy of Education. It is published in printed version (ISSN: 1390-3861) and electronic (ISSN: 1390-8626). The management of SOPHIA is performed through the following parameters: The journal uses anti-plagiarism systems The articles have identification code (Digital Object Identifier) EThe editorial process is managed through the Open Journal System It is an Open Access publication with a Creative Commons license The copyright and post-print policies are published in the SHERPA/ROMEO Auto-ar- chive Policy Repository. Los artículos de la presente edición pueden consultarse en: • http://revistas.ups.edu.ec/index.php/sophia
    [Show full text]
  • Play-Based Interventions
    WWC Intervention Report U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION What Works Clearinghouse Early Childhood Education Interventions for Children with Disabilities April 2012 Play-Based Interventions No studies of play-based interventions that fall within the scope of the Early Childhood Education Interventions for Children with Disabilities review protocol meet What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence standards. The lack of studies meeting WWC evidence standards means that, at this time, the WWC is unable to draw any conclusions based on research about the effectiveness or ineffective- ness of play-based interventions on preschool children with disabilities in early education settings. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of this intervention. Program Description1 Play-based interventions are practices designed to improve socio-emotional, physical, language, and cognitive devel- opment through guided interactive play. During play sessions, an interventionist uses strategies including modeling, verbal redirection, reinforcement, and indirect instruction to sustain and encourage child play activities. Through the use of appropriate play materials and the direction of the interventionist, the goal is for young children with disabili- ties to be better able to explore, experiment, interact, and express themselves. Play-based interventions can be conducted across a variety of settings, including at school or at home, as one-on-one activities between an interventionist and a child, or in small group settings. Research2 The WWC identified 62 studies of play-based interventions for preschool children with disabilities in early education settings that were published or released between 1989 and 2011. Three studies are within the scope of the Early Childhood Education Interventions for Children with Disabilities review protocol and were reviewed for this intervention report.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy of Science and Educational Research: Strategies for Scientific Effectiveness and Improvement of the Education
    Philosophy of Science and Educational Research: Strategies for Scientific Effectiveness and Improvement of the Education Omar a. Poncea, José Gómez Galánb and Nellie Pagán-Maldonadoc a Professor (Metropolitan University, AGMUS, Puerto Rico-United States). [email protected] b Research Professor and Director of CICIDE (Metropolitan University, AGMUS, Puerto Rico-United States & Catholic University of Avila, Spain). [email protected] & [email protected] c Professor (Metropolitan University, AGMUS, Puerto Rico-United States). [email protected] Abstract This article is a theoretical study on the effectiveness of educational research in the context of philosophy of science. This topic of discussion, in the area of educational research, has been the subject of intellectual debate and arises again at the beginning of the 21st century. This article outlines the challenges and opportunities for scientific effectiveness facing educational research if it aspires to contribute to the ideal of an education of excellence and quality. Nine strategies to improve scientific effectiveness in educational research are identified and discussed. As a conclusion, it is argued that the foundations of contemporary educational research need to be revisited and reformulated, parallel to the new concepts present in the philosophy of science, to face the new problems present in our society*. Keywords: Educational Research; Philosophy of Science; Scientific Knowledge; Scientific Effectiveness; Education. 1. Introduction Philosophical thinking centered on science has been an object of intense debate for centuries. Thus, when we speak today of philosophy of science, we refer fundamentally to any reflection produced around the scientific methodology and its results. It faces, from the point of view of reason, the nature of science and the philosophical problems generated around it, with a direct implication in its results and applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Haven't We Seen This Before?
    Teacher EducationShelley C. Quarterly, Sherman Fall 2009 Haven’t We Seen This Before? Sustaining a Vision in Teacher Education for Progressive Teaching Practice By Shelley C. Sherman Efforts to transform U.S. schools and improve student learning, including both accountability measures and progressive practices, come in cycles and are often related to contextual factors in society at particular moments in time (Cuban, 1993; Noddings, 2007; Zilversmit, 1999). Attempts to improve education during the past forty years under the banner of “educational reform” have included political initiatives generated externally by those who do not work within schools, as well as pedagogical trends and movements conceived and implemented by educators themselves. Moreover, such endeavors often gain rapid support and, subsequently, lose traction as bandwagon movements often do, reinventing themselves years later packaged somewhat differently. A variety of such initiatives have affected the way curriculum in schools is shaped and how teachers teach. For example, the standards movement has provided the impetus for a one-size-fits-all curriculum (see, for example, Meier & Wood, 2004, Noddings, 2007), with uniform benchmarks for achievement for students at particular grade levels. On Shelley C. Sherman is an the other hand, the open education movement of the associate professor and late 1960s and early 1970s promoted responsiveness chair of the Education to students and aimed to meet students’ individual Department at Lake needs (Perrone, 1972; Silberman, 1973). Forest College, Lake The central issue I will address here concerns Forest, Illinois. the challenge to teacher education programs to resist 41 Haven’t We Seen This Before? swings in the pendulum and help new teachers sustain progressive, responsive, school-based reform efforts that seek to address the unique needs of every student even as external demands for standardized measurements of learning remain firmly in place in the era of No Child Left Behind.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of IES Research on Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education July 2013
    Synthesis of IES Research on Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education July 2013 Karen E. Diamond Purdue University Laura M. Justice The Ohio State University Robert S. Siegler Carnegie Mellon University Patricia A. Snyder University of Florida NCSER 2013-3001 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Synthesis of IES Research on Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education JULY 2013 Karen E. Diamond Purdue University Laura M. Justice The Ohio State University Robert S. Siegler Carnegie Mellon University Patricia A. Snyder University of Florida NCSER 2013-3001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Synthesis of IES Research on Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education This report was prepared for the National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences under Contract ED-IES-12-D-0014. Disclaimer The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) at the U.S. Department of Education contracted with National Capitol Contracting, LLC to develop a report that that describes what has been learned from research grants on early intervention and childhood education funded by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) National Center for Education Research and National Center for Special Education Research and published in peer-reviewed outlets through June 2010. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and they do not necessarily represent the opinions and positions of the Institute of Education Sciences or the U.S. Department of Education. U.S. Department of Education Arne Duncan, Secretary Institute of Education Sciences John Q. Easton, Director National Center for Special Education Research Joan McLaughlin, Acting Commissioner July 2013 This report is in the public domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering Pedagogical Beliefs and Practices in Higher Education Through the Lens of Mind, Brain, and Education Science
    1 Doctoral Student Research Briefs School of Education Drexel University Uncovering Pedagogical Beliefs and Practices in Higher Education through the Lens of Mind, Brain, and Education Science by Tamara Galoyan Drexel University Supervising Professors: Dr. Kristen Betts and Dr. Penny Hammrich Editors: Dr. Penny L. Hammrich Professor and Associate Dean of Graduate Studies Dr. Rajashi Ghosh Associate Professor and Program Director of the PhD Program Dr. Kathy Geller Associate Clinical Professor and Program Director of the EdD Program Tamara Galoyan PhD Candidate Katelyn Alderfer PhD Student Copy Editor: Anthony Hopkins Marketing and Communications Manager Volume 2 Number 15 May 4, 2018 2 Uncovering Pedagogical Beliefs and Practices in Higher Education through the Lens of Mind, Brain, and Education Science Tamara Galoyan Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence and predictors of neuromyths and to examine learning sciences literacy among instructors, instructional designers, and professional development administrators who work in higher education across onsite, online, and blended environments at four-year and two-year higher education institutions. This study seeks to identify factors that may predict beliefs in neuromyths and an understanding of varying levels of learning sciences literacy, including demographics, educational attainment, professional development, and neuroeducation exposure. Background Mind, Brian, and Education science. Advances in brain research and brain imaging technology in the past few decades has completely reshaped the areas of cognitive psychology and neuroscience and served as basis for the emergence of Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE) science. MBE science has been defined as a discipline that has been shaped by the different histories, philosophies, and epistemologies guiding education, psychology, and neuroscience (Tokuhama-Espinosa, 2008; 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • School of Teaching, Learning and Educational Sciences 1
    School of Teaching, Learning and Educational Sciences 1 a Professional Portfolio with three separate submissions. It should be SCHOOL OF TEACHING, noted that all previous coursework must be successfully completed prior to participation in the final two semesters. Oklahoma certification also LEARNING AND EDUCATIONAL mandates the Certification Examinations for Oklahoma Educators. The Bachelor of Science in Secondary or K-12 Education degree is SCIENCES designed to prepare teacher candidates who are life-long learners, Shelbie Witte, PhD—Chuck and Kim Watson Endowed Chair and School emerging professionals and subject matter specialists with strong liberal Head arts backgrounds. Each secondary/K-12 degree and certification program includes general education courses, extensive specialization coursework The School of Teaching, Learning and Educational Sciences develops in the discipline area, and professional education courses accompanied outstanding education professionals and school psychologists who have by school-based field experiences. Degree options leading to certification the confidence and demonstrated competence to be leaders, advocates, for teaching grades 5-12 are English and social studies. The foreign and agents of change in regional, national and world communities. language option leads to certification in grades K-12. Secondary science We employ and model authentic, engaging methods and innovative, and mathematics education students pursue degrees from the College collaborative practices to develop scholars, especially teachers, teacher of Arts and Sciences through the OSUTeach program. Students complete educators and school psychologists who are transformative leaders and a Professional Portfolio with three separate submissions. Oklahoma reflective practitioners adept at using creative and effective methods certification also mandates the Certification Examinations for Oklahoma to foster productive and just communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of Education Research at the Institute of Education Sciences in the U.S
    The Future of Education Research at the Institute of Education Sciences in the U.S. Department of Education June 29, 2021 Speaker Bios – Meeting #2, Day 1 Updates from Study Sponsor ELIZABETH ALBRO is the Commissioner of the Institute of Education Sciences National Center for Education Research (NCER). Dr. Albro's career has been dedicated to building bridges between the basic sciences of learning and education practice. Trained in the behavioral and social sciences, cognition, and communication, she received her Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Chicago. Her research expertise includes understanding the role of memory in reading comprehension; examining how peer relationships shape conflict and conflict resolution in young children; and designing small-scale experimental research. Since coming to IES in 2002, she has sought to integrate basic and applied work. As a program officer, she oversaw multiple research grant portfolios, helping to build the Cognition and Student Learning, and Reading and Writing research portfolios. In her roles as Associate Commissioner of Teaching and Learning and as Acting Commissioner of Education Research, she played a pivotal role in launching several large-scale research efforts, including the Reading for Understanding Research Initiative, the National Research and Development Center on Cognition and Mathematics Instruction, and the Early Learning Network. Dr. Albro also identified and worked closely with the expert panel who wrote one of the first IES Practice Guides, Organizing Instruction to Support Study and Learning. Throughout her career, she has been committed to ensuring that the findings from federally funded research are shared widely with the public and currently serves as the Department's lead on public access and open science.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute of Education Sciences PDF (675KB)
    Department of Education INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION SCIENCES Fiscal Year 2020 Budget Request CONTENTS Page Appropriations Language ........................................................................................................ V-1 Analysis of Language Provisions and Changes....................................................................... V-2 Appropriation, Adjustments, and Transfers ............................................................................. V-3 Summary of Changes ............................................................................................................. V-4 Authorizing Legislation ............................................................................................................ V-5 Appropriations History ............................................................................................................. V-6 Significant Items in FY 2019 Appropriations Reports............................................................... V-7 Summary of Request .............................................................................................................. V-9 Activities Research, development, and dissemination ..................................................................... V-12 Statistics ........................................................................................................................... V-19 Regional educational laboratories .................................................................................... V-29 Assessment .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M.Ed. in Educational Psychology Degree Offers Training in the Theoretical Principles, Research, and Practices of Educational Psychology
    MEd in Educational Psychology Master of Education in Educational Psychology The Department of Education Sciences and Professional Programs provides training in the theory, research, and practice of the psychological mechanisms underlying teaching, learning, and human development of students as well as the related school processes and structures. The department also specializes in educational research, psychoeducational assessment, and school psychology. The M.Ed. in Educational Psychology degree offers training in the theoretical principles, research, and practices of educational psychology. The degree is intended to facilitate career advancement within educational and community- based settings and to prepare candidates to pursue other advanced degrees in education or psychology. The M.Ed. in Educational Psychology degree consists of 33 hours of graduate coursework in the following areas: A. Foundations (15 hours) B. Electives (12-15 hours) C. Capstone Experience (3-6 hours) The foundations courses consist of 3 hours of study regarding the educational and psychological foundations of educational psychology, 3 hours of learning and cognition, 3 hours of human development, and 6 hours of statistics, research design, and/or program evaluation. The specific courses chosen for the electives and capstone experience will vary according to the candidate’s interests and the emphasis area, if any, that is chosen. Emphasis Areas When completing the basic degree requirements for the M.Ed. in Educational Psychology, candidates may choose one of two optional emphasis areas: (1) Character and Citizenship Education or (2) Educational Research and Program Evaluation. These emphasis areas are created via completion of specified lists of courses from which to choose rather than 15 hours in free electives.
    [Show full text]
  • Motivation for Learning Science in Kindergarten
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING VOL. 46, NO. 2, PP. 166–191 (2009) Motivation for Learning Science in Kindergarten: Is There a Gender Gap and Does Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Instruction Make a Difference Helen Patrick, Panayota Mantzicopoulos, Ala Samarapungavan Department of Educational Studies, Purdue University, 100 North University Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2098 Received 29 July 2007; Accepted 14 July 2008 Abstract: We investigated whether kindergarten girls’ and boys’ (N ¼ 162) motivation for science (perceived competence and liking) differed. Children were ethnically and linguistically diverse, primarily from low-income families, and attended one of three schools. One school offered a typical kindergarten science experience. Kindergarteners in the other two schools participated in the Scientific Literacy Project (SLP)—a program based on a conceptually coherent sequence of integrated science inquiry and literacy activities. SLP lasted either 5 or 10 weeks. Regardless of sex, both groups of SLP children had greater motivation for science than children who had only the regular science experience. Moreover, children receiving 10 weeks of SLP reported greater science competence than those who received 5 weeks. Boys in regular classrooms reported liking science more than did girls, however there was no sex difference for SLP children. These results are supported by interview data accessing children’s ideas about science. The findings suggest that early meaningful participation in science is likely to promote girls’ and boys’ motivation for science. ß 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 46: 166–191, 2009 Keywords: kindergarten; motivation; perceived competence; liking; sex/gender differences; inquiry; literacy Females are under-represented in degrees earned and careers related to physical science, computer and information science, and engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin C. Heddy, Associate Professor, University of Oklahoma—Page 1
    Benjamin C. Heddy, Associate Professor, University of Oklahoma—Page 1 Curriculum Vitae Benjamin C. Heddy, Ph.D. 820 Van Vleet Oval, Collings Hall Room 309 Norman, OK 73019 Email: [email protected] Phone: 405-905-5613 Educational History 2011-2014 University of Southern California Ph.D. Urban Education Policy Concentration: Educational Psychology Cognate: Social Psychology Dissertation Title: Facilitating interest and out-of-school engagement in science in secondary school girls: Increasing the effectiveness of the TTES model through parental involvement Advisor: Gale M. Sinatra, Ph.D. 2009-2011 University of Nevada, Las Vegas Ph.D. Educational Psychology, transferred to USC Advisor: Gale M. Sinatra, Ph.D. 2007-2009 University of Northern Colorado M.A. Educational Psychology Concentration: Measurement and Assessment Thesis Title: Teaching for transformative experience in social psychology Advisor: Kevin J. Pugh, Ph.D. 2003-2007 Ferris State University B.S. Psychology Research Interests I explore cognitive and motivational aspects of learning including engagement, academic emotions, and interest development. I specialize in the investigation of learning activities that occur in everyday experience. As a second related line of research I study the mechanisms of conceptual and attitudinal change. Professional Employment 2020-present Associate Professor, University of Oklahoma. Designing and teaching educational psychology related courses. Maintaining an active program of research. Providing service to the university, community, and profession. Benjamin C. Heddy, Associate Professor, University of Oklahoma—Page 2 2014-2020 Assistant Professor, University of Oklahoma. Designing and teaching educational psychology related courses. Maintaining an active program of research. Providing service to the university, community, and profession. 2011-2014 Graduate Assistant, University of Southern California.
    [Show full text]