DOCSLIB.ORG

CEE Banking M&A Study 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CEE Banking M&A Study 2019 CEE banking consolidation perking up Dealmakers with agenda on both sides November 2019 Contents Foreword 1 Number of M&A deals in the CEE Region 2 CEE macroeconomic overview 4 Banking trends in CEE 5 Banking M&A dynamics in CEE 12 Digital transformation, FinTech 18 Poland 22 Czech Republic 26 Slovakia 30 Hungary 34 Romania 38 Slovenia 42 Croatia 46 Bulgaria 50 Serbia 54 Ukraine 58 Bosnia and Herzegovina 64 Albania 68 Baltic region (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) 72 List of abbreviations 83 Disclaimer 83 Contacts 84 For more details behind the study, use the QR scenner on the last page 2 Foreword remained solid with an average over 20% therefore with no efficient economies of in the 15 countries, NPL ratios and volumes scale. The expected economic softening gravitated further to the south, while might also put more pressure on less profitability rose to historically high levels efficient banks. Consolidation seems to in several countries with an average ROE be perking up with an increasing number around 11% and no loss making banking of deals. We have seen many recent Leveraging on the success of our NPL sectors. These positive dynamics were deals from the inside, therefore we see study series which provides an overview backed by stable economic expansion with that agenda is there on both sides of the on non-performing loan markets in 15 an average real GDP growth of 3.9% in deals, and acquirers have solid financial countries across CEE and the Baltics, 2018, improving labour market conditions firepower to perform acquisitions. as a leading advisor not only in loan and intense lending activity in the region. Based on all the above, steady deal flow portfolio but banking entity deals as might be expected in the CEE banking well, last year we decided to introduce Besides ongoing digital transformation, market in the forthcoming period also. a new study on banking M&A dynamics another prevailing trend in the regional with the same geographical scope, which banking sector is the consolidation of to our great pleasure was very well the banking market, driven by non-core received by the market. Therefore, we exits on the sell side and acquisitive are hereby issuing the second edition growth on the buy side by core regional of our CEE banking M&A study. players to increase economies of scale and boost efficiency. Multiple banking Balázs Bíró Performance of the banking industry sectors in the region are overbanked with Partner, Regional Financial in the CEE and Baltics continued being a fragmented market structure and a Services Industry Leader reassuring. Capital adequacy ratios in 2018 number of banks with low market shares, Financial Advisory 1 Number of M&A deals in the CEE region (2015 – September 2019) 3 5 2 10 3 14 1 8 6 5 10 1 11 6 4 2 Ukraine 14 Serbia 11 Poland 10 3 Romania 10 Hungary 8 5 Bulgaria 6 2 Slovenia 6 Croatia 5 10 Latvia 5 Albania 4 3 14 Czech Republic 3 1 Estonia 3 8 Lithuania 2 6 5 10 Bosnia and 1 Herzegovina 1 11 Slovakia 1 6 4 3 CEE macroeconomic overview From a macroeconomic perspective, In 2018, the average real GDP growth was the negative real interest rates and the although several strong Western economies 3.9% in the analysed 15 regional countries. depreciating Hungarian currency. While have shown signs of an economic downturn The highest growth rate was reported in in Latvia, the robust GDP growth was recently, the CEE region’s economies Poland (5.1%), Hungary (5.0%) and Latvia driven by the continuously high domestic continued performing well in 2018, (5.0%). The key growth factors in Poland demand. Similarly, other countries of the practically at the same growth pace as in were the strong labour market and the CEE region experienced robust growth 2017. However, there are expectations that accelerating level of private consumptions. in the domestic consumption due to the 2019 might see some economic softening as In Hungary, the main GDP growth drivers improving labour market conditions. weaker Western performance is to have its were the increasing public investments, effect in CEE as well. the advance payments of EU funds, Figure 1. Changes in real GDP, 2016 - 2018 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 4.0% 3.9% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% PL CZ SK HU RO SI HR BG RS UA BH AL EE LV LT 2016 2017 2018 Average - 2017 Average - 2018 Source: EIU All the regional countries recorded lower In the region average unemployment rate unemployment rate in 2018 than in the decreased by 1.2 percentage point, reaching 8.6%. previous year. The highest improvement The region’s labour conditions have generally was achieved by Croatia, Serbia and Slovakia improved with real wage rises in the majority of the with a 2.6-, 2.3- and 1.6-percentage point countries and the continuation of the decreasing decline in unemployment rate, respectively. unemployment rate trend. Figure 2. Unemployment rate, 2016 - 2018 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 9.8% 8.6% 5% 0% PL CZ SK HU RO SI HR BG RS UA BH AL EE LV LT 2016 2017 2018 Average - 2017 Average - 2018 Source: EIU 4 Banking trends in CEE The year of 2018, similarly to 2017, was an improved with continuously decreasing digital banking transformation is ongoing exceptional year for the regional banking NPL ratios. Although banks face profitability in the CEE region, which is inevitable for sector. Profitability recovered attractively challenges in the current low interest future competitiveness and success of in the recent years, and the majority of rate environment, it also helped banks to banks. the analysed 15 countries experienced a increase their lending volumes in all of the positive change in consolidated profitability 15 analysed countries. At the same time, In 2018, the CEE region experienced a ratios. long-term efficiency improvements have slightly weaker growth in banking assets become one of the main challenges of the than in the GDP, which caused an almost The impact of the economic softening was banking sector to improve profitability, four-percentage point decrease in the not experienced in the banking sectors of for which digitalization is inevitable. Thus, average asset penetration ratio for the CEE the CEE region yet, since the profitability the major banking groups have started to banking sector 88.6, which is not rejoicing ratios remained high, the capital adequacy follow the digitalization trends, set their for the CEE banking market. ratios remained stable, and asset quality digitalization strategies, and therefore Figure 3. Banking assets to GDP, 2016 - 2018 140% 120% 100% 92.3% 88.6% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% PL CZ SK HU RO SI HR BG RS UA BH AL EE LV LT 2016 2017 2018 Average - 2017 Average - 2018 Source: ECB CBD, Eurostat There is a strong positive correlation to the lower-penetrated group, where between the total consolidated assets higher potential future growth is expected. of the banking sector and the country’s The medium-penetrated group consists nominal GDP. In terms of banking of Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Croatia, penetration, the CEE banking sector can Lithuania and Latvia. Slovenia, Czech be categorized into three major groups. Republic and Estonia form the high- Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Bosnia and penetrated group. Herzegovina, Albania and Ukraine belong 5 Figure 4. Banking market penetration to GDP per capita, 2018 30 Higher penetration 25 SI CZ 43.1 270.8 Middle penetration ths) 20 R EE U SK E LV 26.6 ( LT 81.7 22.6 HU a t 28.6 123.5 i p a c 15 GDP / Lower penetration HR RO 64.7 99.8 10 PL 443.7 RS 31.7 BG 5 55.2 BH AL 15.8 UA 11.8 60.7 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Total Assets / capita (EUR ths) Source: ECB CBD, EIU, Eurostat Note: Bubble size: total assets volume in 2018 (EUR bn)) In 2018, the capital adequacy ratio (CAR) Serbia (22%) and Latvia (22%) among the 17.1% and 17.5% respectively. Overall, the remained stable at a 20% level in the CEE 15 analysed countries. The three lowest capitalization of the CEE banking sector region. The highest CAR was reported CARs were recorded in Ukraine, Hungary is healthy and well above the regulatory in Estonia (30%) which was followed by and Bosnia and Herzegovina with 16.2%, minimum. 6 Figure 5. Capital adequacy ratio, 2016 - 2018 35% 30% 25% 20.1% 20% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% PL CZ SK HU RO SI HR BG RS UA BH AL EE LV LT 2016 2017 2018 Average - 2017 Average - 2018 Source: National Banks Total assets of the analysed countries grew shrinking NPL ratios continued in the CEE shrinking but still robust corporate NPL by 10% on average, reaching EUR 1,200 region mostly due to higher cure rate on volume, which was one of the outcome of bn in 2018. The two largest, the Polish the back of solid macro conditions, as the severe macroeconomic crisis of 2014- and Czech banking sectors contributed well as active portfolio cleaning via loan 2015. Ukraine’s NPL ratio was followed from with EUR 633 bn. Strong macroeconomic portfolio sales. The average total NPL ratio distance by Croatia (12.1%) and Albania environment was steadily fuelling banking stood at 7.9% in 2018, 0.6 percentage (11.8%). In the CEE region, the lowest total asset growth in 2018. point lower than in 2017. Retail NPL ratio NPL ratio was posted in Estonia (0.5%), Czech decreased from 8.3% to 7.0% and the Republic (2.7%) and Slovenia (2.7%) in 2018.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Independent Due Diligence of the Banking System of Cyprus
    PIMCO Europe Ltd 11 Baker Street London W1U 3AH England Tel: +44 20 3640 1000 Independent Due Diligence of the Banking System of Cyprus March 2013 Legal Disclaimer and Limiting Conditions This report sets forth information contemplated by the engagement of PIMCO Europe Ltd (together with its affiliates, “PIMCO”) by the Steering Committee (as defined herein) and is prepared in the form contemplated by the agreement between PIMCO Europe Ltd and the Central Bank of Cyprus (the “Agreement”). This report is intended to be read and used as a whole and not in parts. Separation or alteration of any section or page from the main body of this report is expressly forbidden. This report has been prepared exclusively for the Steering Committee. There are no third party beneficiaries with respect to this report, and PIMCO expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) to any third party. PIMCO makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) to any third party in relation to this report. A decision by the Steering Committee to release this report to the public shall not constitute any permission, waiver or consent from PIMCO for any third party to rely on this report. Access to this report and its use by any third party implies acceptance by the third party of the terms and conditions contained in this section and other parts of this report. This report is, in all cases, subject to the limitations and other terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Agreement, in particular exclusions of liability. This report has been produced by using and in reliance on information furnished by third parties, including the Central Bank of Cyprus and the Participating Institutions to which this report relates.
    [Show full text]
  • Ifrs 9 Impairment & Implementation
    EARLY BIRD ONLYREGISTER BY 9 SEPTEMBER£999 3RD SERIES IFRS 9 IMPAIRMENT & IMPLEMENTATION Reviewing Progress Across the Three Phases as the Industry Moves Towards Parallel Runs and Implementation 20-21 SEPTEMBER, 2016 | THE TOWER HOTEL | LONDON HIGHLIGHTS INCLUDE HEAR FROM IFRS 9, ACCOUNTING INTERPRETATION OF THE STANDARD & CREDIT RISK PROFESSIONALS Interpreting the standards set and understanding principle based terms INCLUDING: DATA PROCESSES Alan Burke Diana Kapsa Adapting internal IT and data processes to Head of Risk Head of Credit Risk accommodate the data requirements across IFRS 9 Measurement Methodology Santander UBS SECONDARY IMPACTS OF IFRS 9 Reviewing the secondary impacts on other business Guido Sopp Neil Wannop areas of implementation of IFRS 9 requirements Accounting Expert Head of Accounting Development EXPECTED CREDIT LOSS MODEL Austrian Financial A supervisory perspective of the IFRS 9 expected credit Market Authority Lloyds Banking Group loss model PROVISION MODELS Claudia Eusebio Vivien Brunel The practical implications of building provision models with Director, Accounting Policy Head of Risk & Capital flexible parameters for determining expected losses & Advisory Group Modelling Deutsche Bank Societe Generale DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS Tackling the disclosure requirements of IFRS 9 Oliver Fiala Wolfgang Reitgruber Head of Group Deputy and FVP in Group FORWARD LOOKING SCENARIOS Credit Risk Credit Risk Modelling Developing multiple forward looking scenarios and implementing a forward looking view of impairment Volksbank UniCredit S.p.A. to align with economic forecasts Carol Lynch Julian Parkin IFRS 9 & BASEL III Head of Impairment Head of Regulatory & Consistency of IFRS 9 requirements with Basel III Analysis & Reporting, Statutory Portfolio, IFRS 9 & Impairment Unit Finance Change BUSINESS BEHAVIOUR & RUNNING Bank of Ireland Royal Bank of Scotland OF THE BUSINESS Tata and TCS Marks - Stacled with Tagline The effect of IFRS 9 on business behaviour and running Artwork provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions and Methods of Completing Payment Orders
    1 INSTRUCTIONS AND METHODS OF COMPLETING The Payer shall enter the following data into the fields marked with the »Payer« inscription: PAYMENT ORDERS - IBAN, which is Payer’s account number, I. Purpose - Reference, The Instructions and methods of completing payment orders form part of the - Name and address, General Terms and Conditions and are intended for the user of payment - The purpose code, which is published and available on the web page services. The main function of payment services is fast and quality transfer of http://www.zbs-giz.si/news.asp?StructureId=886&ContentId=1889 funds. Speed and quality of conducting payment services depend on a large - Purpose of payment/Deadline for payment and extent on accuracy of data, contained in payment orders. Incomplete data do - Payer’s signature and optionally a stamp if the Payer decides to use the not ensure enough information for booking and processing payment orders, stamp. at the same time they cause additional costs due to longer procedure of acquiring additional information, processing claims and consequently time The Recipient shall enter the following data into the fields marked with the delays at booking. »Recipient« inscription: - Amount, Within the Bank Association of Slovenia, technical standards for the UPN – Universal Payment Order (hereinafter referred to as: UPN) have been prepared. - Date of payment in the DDMMLLLL form, For conducting domestic internal, cross-border and other international - BIC of the Recipient’s bank - optional, payment transactions, internal forms are also in use at the Bank. In - IBAN (SI56 is denomination for Slovenia, for cross-border payments continuation, instructions and methods of correct completing of payment appropriate code shall be used), which is Recipient’s account number, orders and forms are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • BRANDFINANCE Banking
    BRANDFINANCE® banKING 500 THE ANNUAL REPORT ON THE World’S MOST VALUABLE Banking brands | MARCH 2013 Is the global banking crisis nearly over? 2 | BRANDFINANCE® BANKING 500 | MARCH 2013 Contents Contents BRANDFINANCE® 3 FOREWORD BANKING 500 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The BrandFinance® Banking 500 Is the global banking crisis nearly over? is published by Brand Finance plc and is the only study to rank the 6 THE TOP 20: PROFILES top 500 most valuable banks in Worthy winners the world A run-down of the world’s most valuable banking brands 15 WINNERS AND LOSERS East beats West Agricultural Bank of China enjoyed the biggest gain in brand value this year, and HSBC suffered the biggest loss Brand Finance plc 3rd Floor, Finland House, 16 REGIONAL RESULTS 56 Haymarket, London A shifting picture SW1Y 4RN United Kingdom The overall result masks important regional and country Tel: +44 (0) 207 389 9400 variations Fax: +44 (0) 207 389 9401 www.brandfinance.com 19 SECTOR RESULTS [email protected] 20 BANKING FORUM 2013 Welcome to the age of Apple Bank? Pundits at Brand Finance’s fourth annual Banking Forum in February challenged banks to think outside the banking box when it comes to customer focus. 24 METHODOLOGY How do we value brands? 25 BESPOKE REPORTS 26 THE TOP 500 MOST VALUABLE BANKING BRANDS Five pages of league table results Publishing partner Every year the BrandFinance® Banking 500 is published by The Banker magazine, the world’s premier banking and finance resource MARCH 2013 | BRANDFINANCE® BANKING 500 | 3 Foreword David Haigh CEO Brand Finance plc The improved performance of banks around the world reflects a concerted effort‘ to get their houses in order Since it was first compiled THE STORM CLOUDS over the global ’increasingly targeted at the specific needs in 2005 the BrandFinance® banking industry seem, at last, to be clearing.
    [Show full text]
  • Asseco Poland Sa Condensed Consolidated Financial
    ASSECO POLAND SA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE ASSECO GROUP FOR THE 2 ND QUARTER OF 2007 PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS THE ASSECO GROUP Q2 2007 All figures in PLN thousands CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE ASSECO GROUP FOR THE 2 ND QUARTER OF 2007 Table of contents Page FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ASSECO GROUP................................................................................................................................. 3 MERGER WITH ASSECO POLAND SA AND ISSUANCE OF SHARES........................................................................................... 4 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT.................................................................................................... 6 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.......................................................................................................................... 7 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY ........................................................................... 9 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS ................................................................................................ 10 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE ASSECO GROUP ............................................................................................................... 14 GENERAL INFORMATION................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Türk Eximbank Uygulamalarinda Risk
    T.C İSTANBUL TİCARET ÜNİVERSİTESİ DIŞ TİCARET ENSTİTÜSÜ ULUSLARARASI TİCARET HUKUKU VE AB ANABİLİM DALI TÜRK EXİMBANK UYGULAMALARINDA RİSK YÖNETİMİ YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ SILANUR ÇIRAK Danışman Dr. Öğr. Üyesi V. Ferhan BENLİ İstanbul, 2018 ÖNSÖZ Çalışmalarım sırasında benden manevi desteklerini esirgemeyen sevgili babam Hayati ÇIRAK'a, annem Şükran ÇIRAK'a, kardeşim Emrah ÇIRAK'a ve arkadaşım Gökhan ÖZEN'e en içten teşekkürlerimi sunmayı bir borç bilirim. ÖZET Risk Yönetimi temel olarak işletmelerin varlığını sürdürmeye yönelik olası tehditleri tespit edip değerlendirerek önlemeyi veya minimize etmeyi amaçlayan bir sistemler bütünüdür. Bu kavram hayatımıza, 2001 yılında ülkemizde yaşanan Bankacılık Krizi ile girmiş ve Bankacılık Düzenleme ve Denetleme Kurulu'nun(BDDK) benimsediği uluslararası Basel Kriterleri ile tanınır hale gelmiştir. Türk Eximbank'ın ana hedef kitlesi Türkiye'de yerleşik ihracatçılar, ihracat odaklı üretim yapan imalatçılar ile yurtdışında etkinlik gösteren müteahhitler ve girişimciler olmakla birlikte Banka, ilgili gruplara kredi, sigorta ve garanti hizmetleri vermektedir. Bu çerçevede geniş yelpazede hizmet sunan Türk Eximbank'ta olası risklere karşı bütüncül ve uluslararası normlara uygun politikalar belirlenerek banka faaliyetleri ile ilgili riskler yönetilmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ilk bölümde; Eximbank'ların Dünya Ticaret Finansmanındaki Rolü ve Önemi, Türk Eximbank’ı ticari bankalardan ayıran ve iş modeli ile risk yönetimi politikasını doğrudan etkileyen özellikleri ve Basel prensipleri incelenmiştir. Ayrıca
    [Show full text]
  • Erste Group Bank AG Resolution Plan Reduced Plan Public Section December 2018
    Erste Group Bank AG Resolution Plan Reduced Plan Public Section December 2018 Resolution Plan (Reduced Plan) 1. Introduction Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 ("Dodd-Frank Act") requires systemically important financial institutions that conduct business in the United States ("U.S.") to file resolution plans with U.S. regulators. Section 165(d) has been implemented through regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("FRB") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") that require a foreign- based Covered Company to provide detailed information about its entities and activities in the U.S., including the process by which those entities and activities would be resolved in the event of the company's material distress or failure ("Regulations"). Pursuant to the Regulations, Erste Group Bank AG ("EGB"), as a Covered Company, filed a Tailored Resolution Plan with the FRB and FDIC in December of 2015. Subsequent to the review by the FRB and FDIC of EGB's Tailored Resolution Plan, the FRB and the FDIC, in their letter dated June 10, 2016, informed EGB that they have jointly determined to reduce the informational content that EGB will be required to provide in its resolution plan submissions due by December 31, 2016, 2017 and 2018 ("Reduced Plans"), subject to "Conditions for Reduced Plans". Subject to the Conditions for Reduced Plans, EGB's Reduced Plan that must be submitted by December 31, 2018 is required to contain only information concerning the following
    [Show full text]
  • O-SII Notification
    Notification template for Article 131 CRD – Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) Please send this template to • [email protected] when notifying the ESRB; • [email protected] when notifying the ECB; • [email protected] when notifying the EBA. Emailing this template to the above-mentioned addresses constitutes an official notification, no further official letter is required. In order to facilitate the work of the notified authorities, please send the notification template in a format that allows electronically copying the information. 1. Notifying national authority 1.1 Name of the notifying National Committee for Macroprudential Oversight authority 2. Description of the measure Based on data available as of 31 March 2017, 9 credit institutions Romanian legal entities obtained a score higher than the threshold set for automatic designation of systemically important institutions (275 basis points). The re-evaluation based on June 2017 available data generated the same results. The name and LEI code of the systemically important institutions identified in Romania are provided below. Banca Comercială Română S.A. – LEI code 549300ORLU6LN5YD8X90 BRD - Groupe Societe Generale S.A. – LEI code 5493008QRHH0XCLJ4238 2.1 Concerned institution UniCredit Bank S.A. – LEI code 5493003BDYD5VPGUQS04 or group of institutions Raiffeisen Bank S.A. – LEI code 549300RFKNCOX56F8591 Banca Transilvania S.A. – LEI code 549300RG3H390KEL8896 Alpha Bank România S.A. – LEI code 529900TKT32Z5LP7XF90 CEC Bank S.A. – LEI code 2138008AVF4W7FMW8W87 Bancpost S.A. – LEI code 549300GM6AMB2XDWNC96 Garanti Bank S.A. – LEI code 549300UZRCTIM0HREY46 An O-SII buffer applicable in 2018 is set for the systemically important institutions which are Romanian legal entities.
    [Show full text]
  • CE Banking Outlook Winning in the Digital Arms Race October 2016 Contents
    CE Banking Outlook Winning in the Digital Arms Race October 2016 www.deloitte.com\cebankingoutlook Contents Foreword Index of Banks Covered by Digital Maturity Executive Summary Analysis Banking Outlook Contacts in Central Europe Bulgaria Croatia The Czech Republic Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia Slovenia Foreword Although the performance of the banking sector in Central (1.3-1.5 percentage points above the eurozone). This relatively Foreword Europe (CE) is shifting up a gear as lending growth accelerates healthy economy has led a faster recovery of loan growth in CE to Executive and asset quality improves, profitability is still well below 3.4% y/y in 2015 (3 p.p. above Euro area) and should allow a further Summary pre-crisis levels. With low interest rates driving margin pick up to 5.0% y/y in 2018. Banking compression and a rising regulatory burden, banks need to Outlook improve operating efficiency. Asset quality has also been improving, with the non-performing loan Banks covered (NPL) ratio in CE down from a peak of 11.0% in 2013 to 8.8% in 2015 by Digital Maturity The digital maturity of banks in CE countries varies greatly but and is expected to fall to a level of 7.0% in 2018. As the region’s digitalization is a strategic priority for all. It can not only provide a key recovery progresses, the disparities between the leading countries in Contacts avenue for banks to reduce their cost to serve, it is also an imperative the north (Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia) and those in the that enables them to keep pace with the expectations of customers south (Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia and Slovenia) are who are increasingly online and mobile.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Board's Report on Operations Of
    Asseco Group Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2019 Present in Sales revenues 56 countries 10 667 mPLN 26 843 Net profit attributable highly commited to the parent employees company's shareholders 322.4 mPLN Order backlog for 2020 5.3 bPLN 7 601 mPLN market capitalization 1) 1) As at December 30, 2019 Asseco Group in 2019 non-IFRS measures (unaudited data) Non-IFRS figures presented below have not been audited or reviewed by an independent auditor. Non-IFRS figures are not financial data in accordance with EU IFRS. Non-IFRS data are not uniformly defined or calculated by other entities, and consequently they may not be comparable to data presented by other entities, including those operating in the same sector as the Asseco Group. Such financial information should be analyzed only as additional information and not as a replacement for financial information prepared in accordance with EU IFRS. Non-IFRS data should not be assigned a higher level of significance than measures directly resulting from the Consolidated Financial Statements. Financial and operational summary: • Dynamic organic growth and through acquisitions – increase in revenues by 14.4% to 10 667.4 mPLN and in operating profit by 22.5% to 976.2 mPLN (1 204.4 mPLN EBIT non-IFRS – increase by 14.9%) • International markets are the Group’s growth engine – 89% of revenues generated on these markets • Double-digit increase in sales in the Formula Systems and Asseco International segments • 81% of revenues from the sales of proprietary software and services • Strong business diversification (geographical, sectoral, product) Selected consolidated financial data for 2019 on a non-IFRS basis For the assessment of the financial position and business development of the Asseco Group, the basic data published on a non-IFRS basis constitute an important piece of information.
    [Show full text]
  • CAYMAN ISLANDS) LIMITED (Incorporated with Limited Liability in the Cayman Islands) As Issuer and EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS S.A
    – 6:46 pm – mac5 – 3485 Intro : 3485 Intro Prospectus EFG HELLAS PLC (incorporated with limited liability in England and Wales) as Issuer and EFG HELLAS (CAYMAN ISLANDS) LIMITED (incorporated with limited liability in the Cayman Islands) as Issuer and EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS S.A. (incorporated with limited liability in the Hellenic Republic) as Guarantor €15,000,000,000 Programme for the Issuance of Debt Instruments Under this €15,000,000,000 Programme for the Issuance of Debt Instruments (the “Programme”), each of EFG Hellas PLC and EFG Hellas (Cayman Islands) Limited (each an “Issuer” and, together, the “Issuers”) may from time to time issue debt instruments (“Instruments”) guaranteed by EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A. (the “Guarantor” or the “Bank”) and denominated in any currency agreed between the relevant Issuer and the relevant Dealer (as defined herein). Application has been made to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the “CSSF”) in its capacity as competent authority under the Luxembourg Act dated 10 July 2005 on prospectuses for securities to approve this document as a base prospectus. Application has also been made to the Luxembourg Stock Exchange for Instruments issued under the Programme to be admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange's regulated market and to be listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. References in this Prospectus to Instruments which are intended to be “listed” (and all related references) on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange shall mean that such Instruments have been admitted to trading on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and have been listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • The Competition Council Has Authorized the Merger Between ALPHA BANK AE and EFG EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS SA
    The Competition Council has authorized the merger between ALPHA BANK AE and EFG EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS SA The Competition Council has authorized the economic concentration consisting in merger by absorbtion of EFG Eurobank Ergasias SA by Alpha Bank AE. The analysis of the competition authority found that the notified economic concentration does not raise significant obstacles to effective competition on the Romanian market, respectively does not lead to the creation or strengthening of a dominant position of the merged company to have as effect restriction, prevention or significant distortion of competition on the Romanian market or on a part of it. Since both Alpha Bank AE and EFG Eurobank Ergasias SA hold in Greece more than 2/3 of turnover at European level, there is no obligation this merger to be notified to the European Commission. Community legislation provides that where each of the companies involved achieves more than 2/3 of total turnover in one of member states, the operation is analyzed by the competition authority of respective state as well as by each of the states where the involved parties activate. The merged company shall be called Alpha Eurobank SA. Alpha Bank AE is a company that is part of Alpha group, one of the most important banking and financial services groups in Greece. Alpha Group offers a wide range of services including retail banking, corporate banking, asset management, private sector banking, distribution of insurance products, investment banking, leasing, factoring, management of brokerage services and of estate assets, and brokerage services. In Romania, Alpha group holds control over Alpha Bank Romania S.A., Alpha Leasing Romania IFN S.A., SSIF Alpha Finance Romania S.A., Alpha Insurance Brokers S.R.L., Alpha Astika Akinita Romania S.R.L.
    [Show full text]