DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Table S5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Table S5 Supplementary Table S5 - Genes upregulated by anti-MYCN PNA ProbeID Symbol Description RH30ctrl_SignalRH30mut__SignalRH30pna_Signalpna vs mut pna vs ctrl 206884_s_at SCEL sciellin 2.4 3.3 51.4 3.961 4.421 208266_at C8orf17 chromosome 8 open reading frame 17 16.9 4.1 52.1 3.668 1.624 217462_at C11orf9 chromosome 11 open reading frame 9 2.9 10.9 108.9 3.321 5.231 202175_at CHPF 215 123.9 939 2.922 2.127 210271_at NEUROD2 neurogenic differentiation 2 2.4 13.1 84.6 2.691 5.140 216058_s_at CYP2C19 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily C, polypeptide 19 4.8 12.8 78.2 2.611 4.026 205556_at MSX2 msh homeobox homolog 2 (Drosophila) 18.7 9 52.6 2.547 1.492 217500_at TIAL1 TIA1 cytotoxic granule-associated RNA binding protein-like 1 15.3 16.2 91.3 2.495 2.577 217124_at IQCE IQ motif containing E 25.8 22.3 116.7 2.388 2.177 213929_at 8.3 14 66.5 2.248 3.002 221159_at 33.4 19.1 81.5 2.093 1.287 207498_s_at CYP2D6 cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily D, polypeptide 6 60.8 28.7 110.9 1.950 0.867 210881_s_at IGF2 insulin-like growth factor 2 (somatomedin A) 1556.7 1187.4 4274.8 1.848 1.457 219315_s_at C16orf30 chromosome 16 open reading frame 30 83 61.2 213 1.799 1.360 202410_x_at IGF2 insulin-like growth factor 2 (somatomedin A) 2587.4 1916.7 6376.5 1.734 1.301 220748_s_at ZNF580 zinc finger protein 580 298.5 218.7 722.9 1.725 1.276 221063_x_at RNF123 ring finger protein 123 148.5 84.9 277.3 1.708 0.901 210280_at MPZ myelin protein zero (Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy 1B) 48.7 49.5 160.5 1.697 1.721 205236_x_at SOD3 superoxide dismutase 3, extracellular 49.6 65.8 203.4 1.628 2.036 202328_s_at PKD1 polycystic kidney disease 1 (autosomal dominant) 146.5 88.3 269.7 1.611 0.880 203546_at IPO13 importin 13 190.2 130.2 386 1.568 1.021 221866_at TFEB transcription factor EB 19.4 78.4 230.9 1.558 3.573 205717_x_at PCDHGC3 protocadherin gamma subfamily C, 3 566.7 480.9 1404.2 1.546 1.309 206724_at CBX4 chromobox homolog 4 (Pc class homolog, Drosophila) 136.7 133.1 379.3 1.511 1.472 209383_at DDIT3 DNA-damage-inducible transcript 3 1671.7 1158.9 3225.8 1.477 0.948 40489_at ATN1 atrophin 1 185.3 198.2 548.1 1.467 1.565 220740_s_at SLC12A6 solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters), member 6 19.1 34.6 92.9 1.425 2.282 212682_s_at BC002942 266.8 205.5 549.2 1.418 1.042 200623_s_at CALM3 calmodulin 3 (phosphorylase kinase, delta) 931.6 913.6 2418.2 1.404 1.376 203183_s_at SMARCD1 SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily266.1 d, member 197.61 500.9 1.342 0.913 218245_at LRRC54 leucine rich repeat containing 54 211.3 148.1 373.4 1.334 0.821 206327_s_at CDH15 cadherin 15, M-cadherin (myotubule) 492.2 378.7 943.2 1.317 0.938 220155_s_at BRD9 bromodomain containing 9 447.9 342.8 853.7 1.316 0.931 208831_x_at SUPT6H suppressor of Ty 6 homolog (S. cerevisiae) 490.6 386.7 958.9 1.310 0.967 217419_x_at AGRN agrin 214.9 239.2 589.9 1.302 1.457 204538_x_at NPIP nuclear pore complex interacting protein 1547.1 1344.9 3207.5 1.254 1.052 209370_s_at SH3BP2 SH3-domain binding protein 2 241.8 179.7 426.6 1.247 0.819 221577_x_at GDF15 growth differentiation factor 15 395.3 271.9 638 1.230 0.691 218629_at SMO smoothened homolog (Drosophila) 201.8 160.2 374.7 1.226 0.893 212252_at CAMKK2 calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2, beta 118.7 112 261.5 1.223 1.139 221828_s_at C9orf28 chromosome 9 open reading frame 28 127.9 119.2 278.2 1.223 1.121 210443_x_at OGFR opioid growth factor receptor 237.2 230.7 534.1 1.211 1.171 32094_at CHST3 carbohydrate (chondroitin 6) sulfotransferase 3 88.6 95.3 218.3 1.196 1.301 212811_x_at SLC1A4 solute carrier family 1 (glutamate/neutral amino acid transporter), member 4 53.1 64.1 146.6 1.193 1.465 216041_x_at GRN granulin 468.5 321.5 731.2 1.185 0.642 212285_s_at AGRN agrin 313.7 298.1 676.9 1.183 1.110 201168_x_at ARHGDIA Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alpha 1998.1 1648.5 3662 1.151 0.874 218965_s_at RBM21 RNA binding motif protein 21 121.9 103.6 229 1.144 0.910 202725_at POLR2A polymerase (RNA) II (DNA directed) polypeptide A, 220kDa 442.2 467.4 1030.1 1.140 1.220 212576_at MGRN1 mahogunin, ring finger 1 334.8 325.9 717.3 1.138 1.099 209299_x_at PPIL2 peptidylprolyl isomerase (cyclophilin)-like 2 186.1 138.7 304.2 1.133 0.709 212081_x_at BAT2 HLA-B associated transcript 2 542.2 521.6 1136.4 1.123 1.068 209414_at FZR1 fizzy/cell division cycle 20 related 1 (Drosophila) 97.8 94.4 205 1.119 1.068 201382_at CACYBP calcyclin binding protein 41.6 46.9 101.8 1.118 1.291 215836_s_at PCDHGC3 protocadherin gamma subfamily C, 3 707.5 645 1398.1 1.116 0.983 37028_at PPP1R15A protein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 15A 182.1 223.8 481.3 1.105 1.402 202947_s_at GYPC glycophorin C (Gerbich blood group) 462.6 359.3 769.9 1.099 0.735 200808_s_at ZYX zyxin 671.3 530.6 1136.2 1.099 0.759 208704_x_at APLP2 amyloid beta (A4) precursor-like protein 2 838.6 799 1705.5 1.094 1.024 41386_i_at JMJD3 jumonji domain containing 3 305.1 224.6 478.4 1.091 0.649 212156_at VPS39 vacuolar protein sorting 39 (yeast) 203.6 188 399.5 1.087 0.972 206649_s_at TFE3 transcription factor binding to IGHM enhancer 3 111.5 108.3 228.4 1.077 1.035 211905_s_at ITGB4 integrin, beta 4 23.1 43.3 91.2 1.075 1.981 202284_s_at CDKN1A cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) 1082.4 694.7 1455.6 1.067 0.427 201348_at GPX3 glutathione peroxidase 3 (plasma) 83.2 117.3 245.6 1.066 1.562 36084_at CUL7 cullin 7 272 216.8 448 1.047 0.720 200035_at DULLARD dullard homolog (Xenopus laevis) 658.6 688.1 1419.6 1.045 1.108 203792_x_at PCGF2 polycomb group ring finger 2 240.6 210 432.6 1.043 0.846 203238_s_at NOTCH3 Notch homolog 3 (Drosophila) 675.5 735.4 1511.7 1.040 1.162 200601_at ACTN4 actinin, alpha 4 737.8 534.2 1094.1 1.034 0.568 49051_g_at DTX3 deltex 3 homolog (Drosophila) 111.5 135.3 277 1.034 1.313 204947_at E2F1 E2F transcription factor 1 464.4 496.3 1012.3 1.028 1.124 209079_x_at PCDHGA1 protocadherin gamma subfamily A, 1 625.8 600.3 1222.9 1.027 0.967 202102_s_at BRD4 bromodomain containing 4 1272.7 1227.7 2497.1 1.024 0.972 34260_at KIAA0683 173.7 166.1 336.4 1.018 0.954 35179_at B3GAT3 beta-1,3-glucuronyltransferase 3 (glucuronosyltransferase I) 105.5 83.3 168.3 1.015 0.674 212670_at ELN elastin (supravalvular aortic stenosis, Williams-Beuren syndrome) 591.5 660.2 1333.5 1.014 1.173 202275_at G6PD glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase 436.7 413.4 830.7 1.007 0.928 202775_s_at SFRS8 splicing factor, arginine/serine-rich 8 (suppressor-of-white-apricot homolog, Drosophila)227.7 272.7 547.5 1.006 1.266 216105_x_at PPP2R4 protein phosphatase 2A, regulatory subunit B' (PR 53) 399.8 307.1 609.8 0.990 0.609 208874_x_at PPP2R4 protein phosphatase 2A, regulatory subunit B' (PR 53) 488.4 407.9 807.4 0.985 0.725 200021_at CFL1 cofilin 1 (non-muscle) 17656.7 14663.8 29014.9 0.985 0.717 216071_x_at MED12 mediator of RNA polymerase II transcription, subunit 12 homolog (yeast) 603.3 559.2 1103.6 0.981 0.871 211056_s_at SRD5A1 steroid-5-alpha-reductase, alpha polypeptide 1 (3-oxo-5 alpha-steroid delta 4-dehydrogenase131.2 alpha136.5 1) 269.1 0.979 1.036 91952_at LOC90379 276.7 258.3 506.5 0.972 0.872 211066_x_at PCDHGC3 protocadherin gamma subfamily C, 3 716.1 867.6 1696.8 0.968 1.245 216952_s_at LMNB2 lamin B2 1146.5 1018.5 1990 0.966 0.796 204384_at GOLGA2 golgi autoantigen, golgin subfamily a, 2 142.5 170.5 332.8 0.965 1.224 221938_x_at THRAP5 thyroid hormone receptor associated protein 5 266.5 280.2 545.4 0.961 1.033 208829_at TAPBP TAP binding protein (tapasin) 136.5 141.9 275 0.955 1.011 204998_s_at ATF5 activating transcription factor 5 200 183.9 356 0.953 0.832 217297_s_at MYO9B myosin IXB 267.1 255.6 494.5 0.952 0.889 202812_at GAA glucosidase, alpha, acid (Pompe disease, glycogen storage disease type II) 149.8 156.2 301.5 0.949 1.009 201794_s_at SMG7 Smg-7 homolog, nonsense mediated mRNA decay factor (C. elegans) 469.9 394.1 754.9 0.938 0.684 45749_at FAM65A family with sequence similarity 65, member A 528.9 494.4 945.8 0.936 0.839 210142_x_at FLOT1 flotillin 1 1874 1539.8 2938.8 0.932 0.649 209344_at TPM4 tropomyosin 4 1188.6 1403.8 2677.6 0.932 1.172 218010_x_at C20orf149 chromosome 20 open reading frame 149 1172.9 1414.9 2697.9 0.931 1.202 219223_at C9orf7 chromosome 9 open reading frame 7 162 123.2 234.9 0.931 0.536 201087_at PXN paxillin 241.5 244.1 464.6 0.929 0.944 61297_at CASKIN2 CASK interacting protein 2 117.4 111.3 211.2 0.924 0.847 217891_at C16orf58 chromosome 16 open reading frame 58 188.8 189.9 357.5 0.913 0.921 204999_s_at ATF5 activating transcription factor 5 61.6 92.2 173.5 0.912 1.494 213422_s_at MXRA8 matrix-remodelling associated 8 182.4 153.1 287.7 0.910 0.657 200859_x_at FLNA filamin A, alpha (actin binding protein 280) 742.4 632.9 1189.2 0.910 0.680 206452_x_at PPP2R4 protein phosphatase 2A, regulatory subunit B' (PR 53) 367.2 351.3 659.5 0.909 0.845 212032_s_at PTOV1 prostate tumor overexpressed gene 1 962.5 935.5 1754.3 0.907 0.866 33768_at DMWD dystrophia myotonica-containing WD repeat motif 271.6 334.7 625.6 0.902 1.204 208806_at CHD3 chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 3 372.5 385.4 718.4 0.898 0.948 214911_s_at BRD2 bromodomain containing 2 1394.8 1409.7 2621.6 0.895 0.910 211600_at PTPRO protein tyrosine phosphatase, receptor type, O 6614.5 6892.2 12787 0.892 0.951 201050_at PLD3 phospholipase D family, member 3 1614.3 1470.4 2727.2 0.891 0.757 212275_s_at SRCAP 98.5 110.1 203.8 0.888 1.049 211950_at ZUBR1 zinc finger, UBR1 type 1 1585.5 1384.8 2562 0.888 0.692 201908_at DVL3 dishevelled, dsh homolog 3 (Drosophila) 656.9 590.7 1090.7 0.885 0.732 212090_at GRINA glutamate receptor, ionotropic, N-methyl D-asparate-associated protein 1 (glutamate binding)303.7 301.2 555.2 0.882 0.870 212567_s_at MAP4 microtubule-associated protein 4 197.7 302.1 556.8 0.882 1.494 201439_at GBF1 golgi-specific brefeldin A resistance factor 1 875.8 831.4 1523.3 0.874 0.799 219180_s_at PEX26 peroxisome biogenesis factor 26 111.2 138 252.6 0.872 1.184 217912_at DUS1L dihydrouridine synthase 1-like (S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Δ-Protocadherin Function: from Molecular Adhesion Properties to Brain Circuitry
    δ-Protocadherin Function: From Molecular Adhesion Properties to Brain Circuitry DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Sharon Rose Cooper Graduate Program in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Dr. James Jontes, Advisor Dr. Marcos Sotomayor, Co-advisor Dr. Heithem El-Hodiri Dr. Sharon Amacher Copyrighted by Sharon Rose Cooper 2017 Abstract Selective cell-to-cell adhesion is essential for normal development of the vertebrate brain, contributing to coordinated cell movements, regional partitioning and synapse formation. Members of the cadherin superfamily mediate calcium-dependent cell adhesion, and selective adhesion by various family members is thought to contribute to the development of neural circuitry. Members of the δ-protocadherin subfamily of cadherins are differentially expressed in the vertebrate nervous system and have been implicated in a range of neurodevelopmental disorders: schizophrenia, mental retardation, and epilepsy. However, little is known about how the δ- protocadherins contribute to the development of the nervous system, nor how this development is disrupted in the disease state. Here I focus on one member of the δ-protocadherin family, protocadherin-19 (pcdh19), since it has the clearest link to a neurodevelopmental disease, being the second most clinically relevant gene in epilepsy. Using pcdh19 transgenic zebrafish, we observed columnar modules of pcdh19-expresing cells in the optic tectum. In the absence of Pcdh19, the columnar organization is disrupted and visually guided behaviors are impaired. Furthermore, similar columns were observed in pcdh1a transgenic zebrafish, located both in the tectum and in other brain regions.
    [Show full text]
  • ENSG Gene Encodes Effector TCR Pathway Costimulation Inhibitory/Exhaustion Synapse/Adhesion Chemokines/Receptors
    ENSG Gene Encodes Effector TCR pathway Costimulation Inhibitory/exhaustion Synapse/adhesion Chemokines/receptors ENSG00000111537 IFNG IFNg x ENSG00000109471 IL2 IL-2 x ENSG00000232810 TNF TNFa x ENSG00000271503 CCL5 CCL5 x x ENSG00000139187 KLRG1 Klrg1 x ENSG00000117560 FASLG Fas ligand x ENSG00000121858 TNFSF10 TRAIL x ENSG00000134545 KLRC1 Klrc1 / NKG2A x ENSG00000213809 KLRK1 Klrk1 / NKG2D x ENSG00000188389 PDCD1 PD-1 x x ENSG00000117281 CD160 CD160 x x ENSG00000134460 IL2RA IL-2 receptor x subunit alpha ENSG00000110324 IL10RA IL-10 receptor x subunit alpha ENSG00000115604 IL18R1 IL-18 receptor 1 x ENSG00000115607 IL18RAP IL-18 receptor x accessory protein ENSG00000081985 IL12RB2 IL-12 receptor x beta 2 ENSG00000186810 CXCR3 CXCR3 x x ENSG00000005844 ITGAL CD11a x ENSG00000160255 ITGB2 CD18; Integrin x x beta-2 ENSG00000156886 ITGAD CD11d x ENSG00000140678 ITGAX; CD11c x x Integrin alpha-X ENSG00000115232 ITGA4 CD49d; Integrin x x alpha-4 ENSG00000169896 ITGAM CD11b; Integrin x x alpha-M ENSG00000138378 STAT4 Stat4 x ENSG00000115415 STAT1 Stat1 x ENSG00000170581 STAT2 Stat2 x ENSG00000126561 STAT5a Stat5a x ENSG00000162434 JAK1 Jak1 x ENSG00000100453 GZMB Granzyme B x ENSG00000145649 GZMA Granzyme A x ENSG00000180644 PRF1 Perforin 1 x ENSG00000115523 GNLY Granulysin x ENSG00000100450 GZMH Granzyme H x ENSG00000113088 GZMK Granzyme K x ENSG00000057657 PRDM1 Blimp-1 x ENSG00000073861 TBX21 T-bet x ENSG00000115738 ID2 ID2 x ENSG00000176083 ZNF683 Hobit x ENSG00000137265 IRF4 Interferon x regulatory factor 4 ENSG00000140968 IRF8 Interferon
    [Show full text]
  • The Title of the Article
    Mechanism-Anchored Profiling Derived from Epigenetic Networks Predicts Outcome in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Xinan Yang, PhD1, Yong Huang, MD1, James L Chen, MD1, Jianming Xie, MSc2, Xiao Sun, PhD2, Yves A Lussier, MD1,3,4§ 1Center for Biomedical Informatics and Section of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA 2State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Southeast University, 210096 Nanjing, P.R.China 3The University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, and The Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA 4The Institute for Genomics and Systems Biology, and the Computational Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA §Corresponding author Email addresses: XY: [email protected] YH: [email protected] JC: [email protected] JX: [email protected] XS: [email protected] YL: [email protected] - 1 - Abstract Background Current outcome predictors based on “molecular profiling” rely on gene lists selected without consideration for their molecular mechanisms. This study was designed to demonstrate that we could learn about genes related to a specific mechanism and further use this knowledge to predict outcome in patients – a paradigm shift towards accurate “mechanism-anchored profiling”. We propose a novel algorithm, PGnet, which predicts a tripartite mechanism-anchored network associated to epigenetic regulation consisting of phenotypes, genes and mechanisms. Genes termed as GEMs in this network meet all of the following criteria: (i) they are co-expressed with genes known to be involved in the biological mechanism of interest, (ii) they are also differentially expressed between distinct phenotypes relevant to the study, and (iii) as a biomodule, genes correlate with both the mechanism and the phenotype.
    [Show full text]
  • PAPC Couples the Segmentation Clock to Somite Morphogenesis by Regulating N-Cadherin-Dependent Adhesion
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Development (2017) 144, 664-676 doi:10.1242/dev.143974 RESEARCH ARTICLE PAPC couples the segmentation clock to somite morphogenesis by regulating N-cadherin-dependent adhesion Jérome Chal1,2,3,4,5,*, Charlenè Guillot3,4,* and Olivier Pourquié1,2,3,4,5,6,7,‡ ABSTRACT specific level of the PSM called the determination front. The Vertebrate segmentation is characterized by the periodic formation of determination front is defined as a signaling threshold epithelial somites from the mesenchymal presomitic mesoderm implemented by posterior gradients of Wnt and FGF (Aulehla (PSM). How the rhythmic signaling pulse delivered by the et al., 2003; Diez del Corral and Storey, 2004; Dubrulle et al., segmentation clock is translated into the periodic morphogenesis of 2001; Hubaud and Pourquie, 2014; Sawada et al., 2001). Cells of somites remains poorly understood. Here, we focused on the role of the posterior PSM exhibit mesenchymal characteristics and paraxial protocadherin (PAPC/Pcdh8) in this process. We showed express Snail-related transcription factors (Dale et al., 2006; that in chicken and mouse embryos, PAPC expression is tightly Nieto, 2002). In the anterior PSM, cells downregulate snail/slug regulated by the clock and wavefront system in the posterior PSM. We expression and upregulate epithelialization-promoting factors such observed that PAPC exhibits a striking complementary pattern to N- as paraxis (Barnes et al., 1997; Sosic et al., 1997). This molecular cadherin (CDH2), marking the interface of the future somite boundary transition correlates with the anterior PSM cells progressively in the anterior PSM. Gain and loss of function of PAPC in chicken acquiring epithelial characteristics (Duband et al., 1987; Martins embryos disrupted somite segmentation by altering the CDH2- et al., 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Immunoglobulin Superfamily Protein SYG-1 Determines the Location of Specific Synapses in C
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cell, Vol. 112, 619–630, March 7, 2003, Copyright 2003 by Cell Press The Immunoglobulin Superfamily Protein SYG-1 Determines the Location of Specific Synapses in C. elegans Kang Shen and Cornelia I. Bargmann* man, 2001). When the motor nerve terminals reach the Department of Anatomy muscle, motor axons secrete agrin, which acts through Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics the muscle MuSK receptor to cluster acetylcholine re- Howard Hughes Medical Institute ceptors. Axon terminals also secrete neuregulin that Box 0452 stimulates the transcription of AChRs in the synaptic University of California, San Francisco nuclei and release acetylcholine that represses AChR San Francisco, California 94143 expression from extrasynaptic nuclei. Retrograde sig- nals from muscle induce the formation of a mature pre- synaptic active zone. During the development of NMJs Summary and especially in the post-injury regeneration of NMJs, a third cell type, the Schwann cell, plays an essential During nervous system development, neurons form role in defining synaptic sites. Thus, NMJ development reproducible synapses onto specific targets. Here, we involves mutual signaling between multiple cell types at analyze the development of stereotyped synapses of the synapse. the C. elegans HSNL neuron in vivo. Postsynaptic neu- The development of central nervous system synapses rons and muscles were not required for accurate syn- has been studied mostly in dissociated neuronal cul- aptic vesicle clustering in HSNL. Instead, vulval epithe- tures, where synapse formation can be initiated by con- lial cells that contact HSNL act as synaptic guidepost tact between presynaptic axons and postsynaptic neu- cells that direct HSNL presynaptic vesicles to adjacent rons.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Neuroprotective Transcription Factor ATF5 Is Decreased And
    The neuroprotective transcription factor ATF5 is decreased and sequestered into polyglutamine inclusions in Huntington’s disease Ivó H. Hernández1,2,3, Jesús Torres-Peraza1,2,5, María Santos-Galindo1,2, Eloísa Ramos-Morón4, María R. Fernández-Fernández1,2, María J. Pérez-Álvarez1,2,3, Antonio Miranda-Vizuete4 and José J. Lucas1,2* 1 Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa (CBM”SO”) CSIC/UAM, Madrid, Spain. 2 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Networking Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Spain. 3 Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 4 Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, 41013 Sevilla, Spain 5 Present Address: Gerència d’Atenció Primària del Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears (IB-SALUT), Palma, Spain *Corresponding author: José J. Lucas [email protected] http://www.cbm.uam.es/lineas/lucasgroup.htm provided by Digital.CSIC View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by 1 Abstract Activating transcription factor-5 (ATF5) is a stress-response transcription factor induced upon different cell stressors like fasting, amino-acid limitation, cadmium or arsenite. ATF5 is also induced, and promotes transcription of anti-apoptotic target genes like MCL1, during the unfolded protein response (UPR) triggered by endoplasmic reticulum stress. In the brain, high ATF5 levels are found in gliomas and also in neural progenitor cells, which need to decrease their ATF5 levels for differentiation into mature neurons or glia. This initially led to believe that ATF5 is not expressed in adult neurons. More recently, we reported basal neuronal ATF5 expression in adult mouse brain and its neuroprotective induction during UPR in a mouse model of status epilepticus.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrez Symbols Name Termid Termdesc 117553 Uba3,Ube1c
    Entrez Symbols Name TermID TermDesc 117553 Uba3,Ube1c ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 3 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 299002 G2e3,RGD1310263 G2/M-phase specific E3 ubiquitin ligase GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 303614 RGD1310067,Smurf2 SMAD specific E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 308669 Herc2 hect domain and RLD 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 309331 Uhrf2 ubiquitin-like with PHD and ring finger domains 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 316395 Hecw2 HECT, C2 and WW domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 2 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 361866 Hace1 HECT domain and ankyrin repeat containing, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 GO:0016881 acid-amino acid ligase activity 117029 Ccr5,Ckr5,Cmkbr5 chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 GO:0003779 actin binding 117538 Waspip,Wip,Wipf1 WAS/WASL interacting protein family, member 1 GO:0003779 actin binding 117557 TM30nm,Tpm3,Tpm5 tropomyosin 3, gamma GO:0003779 actin binding 24779 MGC93554,Slc4a1 solute carrier family 4 (anion exchanger), member 1 GO:0003779 actin binding 24851 Alpha-tm,Tma2,Tmsa,Tpm1 tropomyosin 1, alpha GO:0003779 actin binding 25132 Myo5b,Myr6 myosin Vb GO:0003779 actin binding 25152 Map1a,Mtap1a microtubule-associated protein 1A GO:0003779 actin binding 25230 Add3 adducin 3 (gamma) GO:0003779 actin binding 25386 AQP-2,Aqp2,MGC156502,aquaporin-2aquaporin 2 (collecting duct) GO:0003779 actin binding 25484 MYR5,Myo1e,Myr3 myosin IE GO:0003779 actin binding 25576 14-3-3e1,MGC93547,Ywhah
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information Integrative Analyses of Splicing in the Aging Brain: Role in Susceptibility to Alzheimer’S Disease
    Supplementary Information Integrative analyses of splicing in the aging brain: role in susceptibility to Alzheimer’s Disease Contents 1. Supplementary Notes 1.1. Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project 1.2. Mount Sinai Brain Bank Alzheimer’s Disease 1.3. CommonMind Consortium 1.4. Data Availability 2. Supplementary Tables 3. Supplementary Figures Note: Supplementary Tables are provided as separate Excel files. 1. Supplementary Notes 1.1. Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project Gene expression data1. Gene expression data were generated using RNA- sequencing from Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) of 540 individuals, at an average sequence depth of 90M reads. Detailed description of data generation and processing was previously described2 (Mostafavi, Gaiteri et al., under review). Samples were submitted to the Broad Institute’s Genomics Platform for transcriptome analysis following the dUTP protocol with Poly(A) selection developed by Levin and colleagues3. All samples were chosen to pass two initial quality filters: RNA integrity (RIN) score >5 and quantity threshold of 5 ug (and were selected from a larger set of 724 samples). Sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq with 101bp paired-end reads and achieved coverage of 150M reads of the first 12 samples. These 12 samples will serve as a deep coverage reference and included 2 males and 2 females of nonimpaired, mild cognitive impaired, and Alzheimer's cases. The remaining samples were sequenced with target coverage of 50M reads; the mean coverage for the samples passing QC is 95 million reads (median 90 million reads). The libraries were constructed and pooled according to the RIN scores such that similar RIN scores would be pooled together.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterization of TPRKB Dependency in TP53 Deficient Cancers
    Identification and Characterization of TPRKB Dependency in TP53 Deficient Cancers. by Kelly Kennaley A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Molecular and Cellular Pathology) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska, Co-Chair Adjunct Associate Professor Scott A. Tomlins, Co-Chair Associate Professor Eric R. Fearon Associate Professor Alexey I. Nesvizhskii Kelly R. Kennaley [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2439-9020 © Kelly R. Kennaley 2019 Acknowledgements I have immeasurable gratitude for the unwavering support and guidance I received throughout my dissertation. First and foremost, I would like to thank my thesis advisor and mentor Dr. Scott Tomlins for entrusting me with a challenging, interesting, and impactful project. He taught me how to drive a project forward through set-backs, ask the important questions, and always consider the impact of my work. I’m truly appreciative for his commitment to ensuring that I would get the most from my graduate education. I am also grateful to the many members of the Tomlins lab that made it the supportive, collaborative, and educational environment that it was. I would like to give special thanks to those I’ve worked closely with on this project, particularly Dr. Moloy Goswami for his mentorship, Lei Lucy Wang, Dr. Sumin Han, and undergraduate students Bhavneet Singh, Travis Weiss, and Myles Barlow. I am also grateful for the support of my thesis committee, Dr. Eric Fearon, Dr. Alexey Nesvizhskii, and my co-mentor Dr. Zaneta Nikolovska-Coleska, who have offered guidance and critical evaluation since project inception.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intrinsically Disordered Proteins of Myelin in Health and Disease
    cells Review Flexible Players within the Sheaths: The Intrinsically Disordered Proteins of Myelin in Health and Disease Arne Raasakka 1 and Petri Kursula 1,2,* 1 Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, NO-5009 Bergen, Norway; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 16 February 2020; Published: 18 February 2020 Abstract: Myelin ensheathes selected axonal segments within the nervous system, resulting primarily in nerve impulse acceleration, as well as mechanical and trophic support for neurons. In the central and peripheral nervous systems, various proteins that contribute to the formation and stability of myelin are present, which also harbor pathophysiological roles in myelin disease. Many myelin proteins have common attributes, including small size, hydrophobic segments, multifunctionality, longevity, and regions of intrinsic disorder. With recent advances in protein biophysical characterization and bioinformatics, it has become evident that intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are abundant in myelin, and their flexible nature enables multifunctionality. Here, we review known myelin IDPs, their conservation, molecular characteristics and functions, and their disease relevance, along with open questions and speculations. We place emphasis on classifying the molecular details of IDPs in myelin, and we correlate these with their various functions, including susceptibility to post-translational modifications, function in protein–protein and protein–membrane interactions, as well as their role as extended entropic chains. We discuss how myelin pathology can relate to IDPs and which molecular factors are potentially involved. Keywords: myelin; intrinsically disordered protein; multiple sclerosis; peripheral neuropathies; myelination; protein folding; protein–membrane interaction; protein–protein interaction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ɑ6ß1 Andɑ7ß1 Integrins Are Required in Schwann Cells to Sort
    The Journal of Neuroscience, November 13, 2013 • 33(46):17995–18007 • 17995 Cellular/Molecular ␣6␤1 and ␣7␤1 Integrins Are Required in Schwann Cells to Sort Axons Marta Pellegatta,1,2 Ade`le De Arcangelis,3 Alessandra D’Urso,1 Alessandro Nodari,1 Desire´e Zambroni,1 Monica Ghidinelli,1,2 Vittoria Matafora,1 Courtney Williamson,2 Elisabeth Georges-Labouesse,3† Jordan Kreidberg,4 Ulrike Mayer,5 Karen K. McKee,6 Peter D. Yurchenco,6 Angelo Quattrini,1 Lawrence Wrabetz,1,2 and Maria Laura Feltri1,2 1San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano 20132, Italy, 2Hunter James Kelly Research Institute, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, New York 14203, 3Development and Stem Cells Program, Institut de Ge´ne´tique et de Biologie Mole´culaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unite´ Mixte de Recherche 7104, Institut National de la Sante´ et de la Recherche Me´dicale U964, Universite´ de Strasbourg, Illkirch 67404, France, 4Department of Medicine, Children’s Hospital Boston and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, 5Biomedical Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom, and 6Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, New Jersey 08854 During development, Schwann cells extend lamellipodia-like processes to segregate large- and small-caliber axons during the process of radial sorting. Radial sorting is a prerequisite for myelination and is arrested in human neuropathies because of laminin deficiency. Experiments in mice using targeted mutagenesis have confirmed that laminins 211, 411, and receptors containing the ␤1 integrin subunit are required for radial sorting; however, which of the 11 ␣ integrins that can pair with ␤1 forms the functional receptor is unknown.
    [Show full text]