INTERSTATE AVIATION COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT on RESULTS of INVESTIGATION of ACCIDENT Type of Accident Fatal Accident Type of Aircr

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

INTERSTATE AVIATION COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT on RESULTS of INVESTIGATION of ACCIDENT Type of Accident Fatal Accident Type of Aircr INTERSTATE AVIATION COMMITTEE AIR ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION COMMISSION FINAL REPORT ON RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION OF ACCIDENT Type of accident Fatal accident Type of aircraft АTR72-201 aeroplane Registration VP-BYZ, Bermudas Owner BLF Limited Operator UTAir Aviation, JSC Place of accident 1500 m from RWY 21 threshold; cross-track deviation about 400 m, Roschino aerodrome, Tyumen. Coordinates: N 57°09.440′ E 065°16.000´ Date and time of accident 02.04.2012, 01:35 UTC (07:35 local time), day time In accordance with ICAO standards and recommended practices, it is not the purpose of this report to apportion blame or liability. The sole objective of the investigation and the Final Report is the prevention of accidents. Criminal aspects of the accident are investigated within the framework of a separate criminal case. Draft Final Report ATR72-201 VP-BYZ 2 Table of contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................... 4 SYNOPSIS ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 1. FACTUAL INFORMATION.......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1. FLIGHT HISTORY ....................................................................................................................................... 11 1.2. INJURIES TO PERSONS ............................................................................................................................... 13 1.3. DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT ............................................................................................................................. 13 1.4. OTHER DAMAGE ........................................................................................................................................ 20 1.5. PERSONNEL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.5.1. Flight Crew Information ...................................................................................................................... 20 1.5.2. Technical Personnel Information ........................................................................................................ 35 1.6. AIRCRAFT INFORMATION .......................................................................................................................... 40 1.6.1. АТR72-201 ice protection system schematic diagram ......................................................................... 43 1.7. METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................ 44 1.8. AIDS TO NAVIGATION ............................................................................................................................... 53 1.9. COMMUNICATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 53 1.10. AERODROME INFORMATION ...................................................................................................................... 53 1.11. FLIGHT AND GROUND RECORDERS ............................................................................................................ 55 1.11.1. On-board recorders ............................................................................................................................. 55 1.11.2. Readout and timing of the CVR and ground recorders data ............................................................... 58 1.11.3. Surveillance cameras’ video data analysis .......................................................................................... 62 1.12. WRECKAGE AND IMPACT INFORMATION.................................................................................................... 64 1.13. MEDICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL INFORMATION .......................................................................................... 70 1.14. SURVIVAL ASPECTS .................................................................................................................................. 73 1.15. SEARCH AND RESCUE OPERATIONS .......................................................................................................... 76 1.16. TESTS AND RESEARCH .............................................................................................................................. 82 1.16.1. Engineering Simulation ....................................................................................................................... 82 1.16.2. FFS Test Flight .................................................................................................................................... 91 1.16.3. Review of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) .............................................................................. 93 1.16.4. MFC Study ........................................................................................................................................... 94 1.16.5. Fuel and Lubricants Analysis .............................................................................................................. 95 1.16.6. Aircraft Trajectory Computation ......................................................................................................... 95 1.17. ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION ............................................................................. 97 1.18. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION .................................................................................................................... 101 1.18.1. Flight Operations at UTAir ............................................................................................................... 101 1.18.2. Results of UTAir-Technic audit performed by EASA ......................................................................... 107 1.18.3. Significant Extracts from Available Current Regulations on De-/Anti-Icing and Staff Training ...... 108 1.18.4. Eye-Witness Explanations Confirming Presence of Contamination on the Aircraft Surface ............ 128 1.18.5. Information on De/Anti-Icing of Other Aircraft on 02.04.2012......................................................... 130 1.18.6. Information on the Movement of De/Anti-Icing Vehicles .................................................................. 130 1.18.7. Accidents Caused by Ground Icing and Aircraft Stall ....................................................................... 131 1.18.8. Information on the PIC's Initial Training at a Flight School ............................................................ 133 1.18.9. English language proficiency assessment .......................................................................................... 134 1.18.10. FAP "Certification of Airports. Procedures" .................................................................................... 142 1.18.11. Of the aviation organizations inspection order ................................................................................. 142 2. ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................................................... 144 2.1. THE ANALYSIS OF THE CLAUSES OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT DETERMINE THE AIRCRAFT ANTI-ICING/DE- ICING PROCEDURE AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PERSONNEL QUALIFICATION TOGETHER WITH THEIR ACCOMPLISHMENT IN RELATION TO THE ACCIDENT FLIGHT .................................................................................... 144 2.2. THE ANALYSIS OF THE SMS IMPLEMENTATION IN UTAIR ....................................................................... 152 2.3. AIRCRAFT PRE-FLIGHT PREPARATION .................................................................................................... 155 2.4. THE FLIGHT DESCRIPTION AND THE ANALYSIS OF THE AIRCRAFT MOTION ............................................... 163 2.5. ANALYSIS OF THE CREW WORK AND REST BALANCE ............................................................................... 171 2.6. THE ANALYSIS OF THE REQUIREMENTS ON PRE-FLIGHT AIR CREWS METEOROLOGICAL SUPPORT ............ 173 2.7. THE ANALYSIS OF THE CREW QUALIFICATION AND ACTIONS ................................................................... 173 INTESTATE AVIATION COMMITTEE 3. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 186 3.1. FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 186 3.2. CAUSES ................................................................................................................................................... 192 4. OTHER SHORTCOMINGS REVEALED BY THE INVESTIGATION ................................................ 195 5. SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................. 196 5.1. TO RUSSIAN AVIATION AUTHORITIES ..................................................................................................... 196 5.2. TO AIRLINES’ MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................. 197 5.3. TO ATR 42/72
Recommended publications
  • Ural in Five Days 5D/4N
    LTD Tour operator «Nеva Seasons»191036, Saint Petersburg, 10, Ligovsky pr., office 212 +7(812)313-43-39 +7 (952) 399-93-64 [email protected] www.nevaseasons.com All Ural in five days 5d/4n Day 1) Arrival to Yekaterinburg Meeting with guide at the airport Transfer to the hotel, check in Lunch at the local restaurant (included) The first day will include a city tour with a visit to the Historical City Site, the central square and the main attractions. Guests will enjoy local cuisine from the Shustov restaurant for lunch. After the lunch guests will visit two museums – Ekaterinburg Museum of Fine Arts with the famous Kaslinsky cast-iron pavilion and Boris Yeltsin President Center with an interactive exhibition dedicated to the first president of the Russian Federation. Free time Overnight Day 2) Breakfast at the hotel, check out Meeting with a guide in the hotel lobby. Transfer to V. Pyshma The second day program will begin with a visit to the museum of automobile and military equipment in Verkhnyaya Pyshma. After it the group will drive to Nevyansk and see its famous leaning tower. Nevyansk is one of the oldest cities in Ural, the center of the Nevyansk icon tradition. The region is also famous for its red clay pottery from the Tavolgi village. Guests will learn the secrets of production with the potter and try to make their own souvenir from Tavolgi. Lunch at the local restaurant (included) Transfer to Nizhny Tagil. Check in Dinner at the hotel restaurant (included) Overnight Day 3) Breakfast at the hotel, check out Meeting with a guide in the hotel lobby.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventeenth Century Siberia As a Land of Opportunity: Social Mobility Among the Russian Pioneers
    ETHNOLOGY DOI: 10.17746/1563-0110.2018.46.3.129-137 A.A. Lyutsidarskaya and N.A. Berezikov Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pr. Akademika Lavrentieva 17, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Seventeenth Century Siberia as a Land of Opportunity: Social Mobility Among the Russian Pioneers On the basis of individual biographies, we explore the social mobility patterns among the Russian colonists of Siberia (members of Russia’s service class) in the 1600s, with reference to theories relating to the sociology of labor and social stratifi cation. We show how peasants, hunters, fi shermen, and freedmen were co-opted into the service class, and how their social status changed at all levels—horizontal, vertical, geographical, individual, group, intergenerational, and within-generational. Occupation, skills, and income were important factors affecting social mobility. For nearly all categories of migrants, the most common tendency was migration of entire families, though younger single migrants were more likely to move over longer distances. In Siberia, where social regulation norms copied those of the metropolis, upward social mobility occurred nearly exclusively within institutions. Social service provided maximal opportunity for the individual’s promotion and for the current and future status of his relatives. This was an effi cient mechanism for securing high mobility in Siberian society. By the early 1700s, the degree of mobility had decreased, downward
    [Show full text]
  • T H E T I M E W O
    GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN By Barbara A. Somervill THE CHILD’S WORLD® CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Published in the United States of America by The Child’s World® PO Box 326, Chanhassen, MN 55317-0326 800-599-READ www.childsworld.com Content Adviser: Photo Credits: Cover/frontispiece: TASS/Sovfoto. Interior: Bryan & Cherry Alexander: 18; Animals Animals/Earth Scenes: 9 (OSF/O. Mark Williams, Newman), 14 (Bradley W. Stahl), 17 (Darek Kapp); Corbis: 11 (Steve Raymer), 26 Associate Professor, (Dave G. Houser); Wolfgang Kaehler: 6; Wolfgang Kaehler/Corbis: 8, 16, 21; Jacques University of Colorado, Langevin/Corbis Sygma: 22; Novosti/Sovfoto: 4, 24; TASS/Sovfoto: 5, 12, 13. Boulder, Colorado The Child’s World®: Mary Berendes, Publishing Director Editorial Directions, Inc.: E. Russell Primm, Editorial Director; Melissa McDaniel, Line Editor; Katie Marsico, Associate Editor; Judi Shiffer, Associate Editor and Library Media Specialist; Matthew Messbarger, Editorial Assistant; Susan Hindman, Copy Editor; Sarah E. De Capua and Lucia Raatma, Proofreaders; Marsha Bonnoit, Peter Garnham, Terry Johnson, Olivia Nellums, Chris Simms, Katherine Trickle, and Stephen Carl Wender, Fact Checkers; Tim Griffin/IndexServ, Indexer; Cian Loughlin O’Day, Photo Researcher; Linda S. Koutris, Photo Selector; XNR Productions, Inc., Cartographer The Design Lab: Kathleen Petelinsek, Design and Page Production Copyright © 2005 by The Child’s World® All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Somervill, Barbara A. The timeworn Urals / by Barbara A. Somervill. p.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter in the Urals 7 Mountain Ski Resort “Stozhok” Mountain Ski Resort “Stozhok” Is a Quiet and Comfortable Place for Winter Holidays
    WinterIN THE URALS The Government of Sverdlovsk Region mountain ski resorts The Ministry of Investment and Development of Sverdlovsk Region ecotourism “Tourism Development Centre of Sverdlovsk Region” 13, 8 Marta Str., entrance 3, 2nd fl oor Ekaterinburg, 620014 active tourism phone +7 (343) 350-05-25 leisure base wellness winter fi shing gotoural.соm ice rinks ski resort FREE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOUNTAIN SKI RESORTS 6-21 GORA BELAYA 6-7 STOZHOK 8 ISET 9 GORA VOLCHIHA 10-11 GORA PYLNAYA 12 GORA TYEPLAYA 13 GORA DOLGAYA 14-15 GORA LISTVENNAYA 16 SPORTCOMPLEX “UKTUS” 17 GORA YEZHOVAYA 18-19 GORA VORONINA 20 FLUS 21 ACTIVE TOURISM 22-23 ECOTOURISM 24-27 ACTIVE LEISURE 28-33 LEISURE BASE 34-35 WELLNESS 36-37 WINTER FISHING 38-39 NEW YEAR’S FESTIVITIES 40-41 ICE RINKS, SKI RESORT 42-43 WINTER EVENT CALENDAR 44-46 LEGEND address chair lift GPS coordinates surface lift website trail for mountain skis phone trail for running skis snowtubing MAP OF TOURIST SITES Losva 1 Severouralsk Khanty-Mansi Sosnovka Autonomous Okrug Krasnoturyinsk Karpinsk 18 Borovoy 31 Serov Kytlym Gari 2 Pavda Sosva Andryushino Tavda Novoselovo Verkhoturye Alexandrovskaya Raskat Kachkanar Tura Iksa 3 Verhnyaya Tura Tabory Perm Region Niznyaya Tura Kumaryinskoe Basyanovskiy Kushva Tagil Niznyaya Salda Turinsk 27 29 Verkhnyaya Salda Nitza 4 Nizhny Tagil 26 1 Niznyaya Sinyachikha Chernoistochinsk Visimo-Utkinsk Alapaevsk 7 Verkhnie Tavolgi Irbit Turinskaya Sloboda Ust-Utka Chusovaya Visim Aramashevo Artemovskiy Verkhniy Tagil Nevyansk Rezh 10 25 Chusovoe 2 Shalya 23 Novouralsk
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2012 to 2018 June, Moscow 2018 This Joint Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2012 to 2018 was prepared jointly by the leading Russian NGOs, including: Public Verdict Foundation, Civic Assistance Committee, Memorial Human Rights Center, OVD-info, Soldiers' Mothers of Saint Petersburg, Independent Psychiatric Association, Human Rights Institute, Stichting Justice Initiative, STAKS Expert and Legal Group, Psychologists for civil society, Citizens Commission on Human Rights in Russia, Urals Human Rights Group, Legal Basis Association, Interregional Center of Human Rights, Memorial Anti- Discrimination Center, Social Partnership Foundation, Russia behind the bars, the Foundation "In defense of the rights of prisoners", Movement for Human Rights and experts: Natalya Lutaya, former member of Kaliningrad Public Oversight Commission and Lyudmila Alpern, former member of Moscow Public Oversight Commission. The Public Verdict Foundation was responsible for coordination of work over the Report, systematizing and editing the Report materials. This Report is submitted to the UN Committee against Torture within the framework of its examination of the Russia's Sixth Periodic Report on implementation of the Convention against Torture. The Report is aimed at comprehensively tackling the issues of observing in Russia the rights enshrined in the Convention and at drawing the Committee experts‘ attention to the most burning problems in the sphere of these rights realization, which have not been reflected in the Russian Federation Report.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2015 ~
    ПАНТЕЛЕИМОНСКИЙ ЛИСТОК PARISH NEWSLETTER ~ Number 137, December 2015 ~ ORTHODOX CHRISTMAS SERVICES IN JANUARY 2016 As Father James will be serving in Wallsend, there will be no services in Gosford for Orthodox Christmas on 6-7 January 2016. For those planning to attend the services in Wallsend for the Great Feast of the Nativity of the Lord, All-night Vigil with the blessing of five loaves, wheat, wine and oil will begin at 6.00pm on Wednesday 6 January , and Divine Liturgy will begin at 9.00am on Thursday 7 January . At the end of Divine Liturgy the customary service of thanksgiving will be served in memory of the defeat of Napoleon and his allies on Christmas Day 1812. Parishioners and friends are invited to gather in the church hall afterwards for a festive meal and a planned visit from Father Christmas. On Friday 8 January , the second day of Christmas, Father James plans to serve at the Archbishop’s Chapel of All Saints of Russia in Croydon , it being customary amongst the clergy of the smaller Sydney parishes to serve on this day with our bishop and continue the celebration of the feast. This year both Metropolitan Hilarion and Bishop George will be present. PARISH LIFE: CHURCH CLEAN-UP ON SATURDAY 2 JANUARY Although we will not have services for Orthodox Christmas this year, we will nevertheless have our customary start-of-year clean-up. Beginning at 8.00am on Saturday 2 January , this will be a major clean-up with everything washed, scrubbed and polished for the beginning of a new year.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Cartography to Ca. 1700 L
    62 • Russian Cartography to ca. 1700 L. A. Goldenberg the Sources of the Cartography of Russia,” Imago Mundi 16 (1962): The perception of a “foreign beginning” to Russian car- 33– 48. 1 tography is deeply rooted. It has been fostered by the 2. In al-Idrı¯sı¯’s large world map, Eastern Europe is placed on eight irretrievable loss of indigenous Russian maps of pre- sheets (nos. 54 –57, 64 –67), which show the Caspian lands, Bashkiria, seventeenth-century date, along with the unfamiliarity Volga Bulgaria, the upper reaches of the Severny (Severskiy) Donets, the with other sources. Thus the traditional cartographic im- Black Sea area, the lower Dniester area, the upper Dnieper area, the Carpathians, the Danube area, and the Baltic area, whereas the north- age of Russia was that provided by the Western European ern Caucasus and the lower Volga area are more distorted. In al-Idrı¯sı¯’s mapmakers. The name “Russia” first appeared in this map, sources for the ancient centers of ninth-century Rus are combined foreign cartographic record in the twelfth century. For ex- with more precise data on the well-traveled trade routes of the twelfth ample, on the Henry of Mainz mappamundi (ca. 1110), century. For al-Idrı¯sı¯ and the map of 1154, see S. Maqbul Ahmad, “Car- it is placed north of the mouth of the Danube; on the map tography of al-Sharı¯f al-Idı¯sı¯,” in HC 2.1:156 –74; Konrad Miller, Map- 2 pae arabicae: Arabische Welt- und Länderkarten des 9.–13. Jahrhun- of the cartographer al-Idrı¯sı¯ (1154), interesting geo- derts, 6 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Ecological Coevolution: an Ecological Analysis of the Historical Development of International Systems in the Circumpolar Arctic
    Page | 1 The London School of Economics & Political Science Socio-Ecological Coevolution: an ecological analysis of the historical development of international systems in the circumpolar Arctic Richard Campanaro A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, July 2012 Page | 2 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 92,502 words. Richard Campanaro Page | 3 Abstract The goal of this thesis is to analyse the impact of Arctic ecology on the development of international systems in the circumpolar world. It is a goal pursued in two steps: (i) by developing an analytical approach capable of tracing the mutual constitution of international and ecological systems in world history; and (ii) by using the resulting toolkit to establish a baseline understanding of the international systems of the polar basin. Part One adapts the analytical approach pioneered by Barry Buzan and Richard Little to study international systems in world history, adding a contextual axis to their analytical matrix in order to escape the anthropocentric cul-de-sac that has heretofore limited IR’s ability to consider ecology’s role in the constitution of international units, processes, and structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Daedaleopsis Genus in Siberia and the Far East of Russia
    Proceedings BDI-2020, 17-26 doi: 10.3897/ap.2.e58134 III Russian National Conference “Information Technology in Biodiversity Research” Daedaleopsis Genus in Siberia and the Far East of Russia Viktoria D. Vladykina*(a), Victor A. Mukhin (b), Susanna M. Badalyan (c) (a) ORCID: 0000-0002-4877-2259, Department of Biodiversity and Bioecology, Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, 620003 Ekaterinburg, Russia (b) ORCID: 0000-0003-4509-4699, Department of Biodiversity and Bioecology, Institute of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, 19 Mira Street, 620003 Ekaterinburg, Russia, Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 202, 8 Marta Street, 620144, Ekaterinburg, Russia (c) ORCID: 0000-0001-9273-5730, Laboratory of Fungal Biology and Biotechnology, Institute of Pharmacy, Yerevan State University, 1 A. Manoogian Street, 0025 Yerevan, Armenia Abstract The current article discusses the findings of the study of biodiversity, distribution, and ecology of Daedaleopsis species in the Siberia and Russian Far East are presented. In this part of Eurasia, the genus Daedaleopsis is represented by 3 species, D. confragosa, D. tricolor and D. septentrionalis. They are distributed in all regions of Siberia and the Russian Far East (the most common are D. confragosa and D. tricolor) and contribute to the decomposition of woody debris of several deciduous (Acer, Alnus, Betula, Carpinus, Chosenia, Crataegus Quercus, Padus, Populus, Salix, Sorbus, Tilia) and rarely coniferous (Abies) trees. Each species has its own pattern of geographical and substrate distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • HOF 2017 Station List
    United States BERING SEA BUOY 46035 BODEGA BAY BUOY 46013 CANAVERAL BUOY 41009 CANAVERAL EAST BUOY 41010 CAPE ELIZABETH BUOY 46041 CAPE SAN MARTIN BUOY 46028 CAPE SUCKLING BUOY 46082 CHESAPEAKE LIGHT COL RIVER BAR BUOY 46029 CORPUS CHRISTI BUOY 42020 DELAWARE BAY BUOY 44009 EAST GULF BUOY 42003 EDISTO BUOY 41004 EEL RIVER BUOY 46022 FAIRWEATHER GROUND BUOY 46083 FRYING PAN SHOALS BUOY 41013 GALVESTON BUOY 42035 GEORGES BANK BUOY 44011 GRAYS REEF BUOY 41008 GULF OF AK BUOY 46001 GULF OF MAINE BUOY 44005 HALF MOON BAY BUOY 46012 HOTEL BUOY 44004 LONG ISLAND BUOY 44025 LUKE OFFSHORE BUOY 42040 MID GULF BUOY 42001 MONTEREY BUOY 46042 NANTUCKET BUOY 44008 NORTH EQUATORIAL 2 BUOY 41041 OREGON BUOY 46002 PENSACOLA BUOY 42039 PT ARGUELLO BUOY 46023 SAN CLEMENTE BASIN BUOY 46086 SOUTH ALEUTIANS BUOY 46003 SOUTH HATTERAS BUOY 41002 SOUTHEAST HAWAII BUOY 51004 SOUTHEAST PAPA BUOY 46006 SOUTHWEST HAWAII BUOY 51002 ST AUGUSTINE BUOY 41012 STONEWALL BANK BUOY 46050 TANNER BANKS BUOY 46047 VIRGINIA BEACH BUOY 44014 WASHINGTON BUOY 46005 WEST GULF BUOY 42002 WEST HAWAII BUOY 51003 WEST TAMPA BUOY 42036 Alabama ALBERTVILLE MUNICIPAL ANNISTON METROPOLITAN AUBURN UNIVERSITY REGIONAL BIRMINGHAM SHUTTLESWORTH INTL CAIRNS AAF CENTREVILLE CLANTON 2 NE COURTLAND 2 WSW CULLMAN 3 ENE DAUPHIN ISLAND DOTHAN REGIONAL FAIRHOPE 3 NE FLORALA MUNICIPAL FOLSOM FIELD GADSDEN 19 N GAINESVILLE 2 NE HUNTSVILLE INTL ISBELL FIELD MADISON COUNTY EXECUTIVE MAXWELL AFB MIDDLETON FIELD MOBILE DOWNTOWN AP MOBILE REGIONAL MONTGOMERY REGIONAL MUSCLE SHOALS 2 N NORTHEAST ALABAMA AP
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial As a Tool of Broadcast the Historic Identity of the City: the Experience of Yekaterinburg
    Athens Journal of Tourism - Volume 1, Issue 4 – Pages 283-296 Biennial as a Tool of Broadcast the Historic Identity of the City: The Experience of Yekaterinburg By Liudmila Starostova Yekaterinburg is one of the Russia's largest cities. It entered into the international competition in promoting cities a few years ago. The strategy of global events is one of the ways to positioning the Yekaterinburg: Yekaterinburg hosted the SCO summit in 2009, the city will hold FIFA World Cup in 2018, today the city claims to host the EXPO 2020. However, not all city events are focused on the translation of the unique Yekaterinburg identity. One of these events is the Ural Industrial Biennial, held in Yekaterinburg twice - in 2010 and 2012. While the industrial theme of Biennial meets certain traditions in the history of the city, the communicative potential of the event is still not used completely. Article aims to determine the location of the Ural Biennial in the conceptualization and translation of historical identity of Yekaterinburg. Introduction Ural Industrial Biennial (UIB) of contemporary art was held in Yekaterinburg for the first time in 2010. The 2nd Ural Industrial Biennial took place in 2012. This event caused a mixed reaction from the local community. Many visitors simply didn‟t understand the exhibited art objects. The question of the justification of this event is sharpened by the fact that a neighboring town to Yekaterinburg – Perm - already has the experience of contemporary art exhibitions. Perm, like Yekaterinburg, is the city of Soviet industrialization with corresponding mentality of city residents. Therefore Permian local community met the idea of Moscow gallery owner Marat Gelman of positioning Perm as the cultural capital through contemporary art exhibitions with hostility.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heraldic “Theater” of Russian Cities
    S. ROGATCHEV THE HERALDIC “THEATER” OF RUSSIAN CITIES S. ROGATCHEV THE HERALDIC “THEATER” OF RUSSIAN CITIES Urban Studies and Practices Vol.1 #4, 2016, 47-57 https://doi.org/10.17323/usp14201647-57 Author: Sergei Rogatchev, Ph.D. in Geography, research fellow, Lomonosov Moscow State University. E-mail: rogachev.mgu@gmail Abstract The usurpation of the right to unite the surrounding territories bestowed some exclusive rights upon Moscow. Which other coat of arms apart from that of Moscow could surround itself with such a suite, such an entourage, of serving shields of arms on its heraldic map? An almost ideal social and geographical model is drawn up around the capital by the coats of arms of Moscow’s retinue: all three principal forces of society are gathered in this national nucleus — those being craftsmen, parishioners and warriors — forming the trade, monastic and defense appendages to St. George’s robe. A century ago, the Bolsheviks placed Russia within a chain of catastrophic events and then effectively ring-fenced the country for about seventy years. The article below was first published in Geograffity magazine in the early 1990s when the Iron Curtain finally came down. The emergence of a magazine like Geograffity was a result of cultural claustrophobia, and it was one of the first attempts in the former Soviet Union to expose the world to the ideas of Russian intellectuals who had worked in total isolation for so many years. Geograffity was produced by Quantum Bureau (Russia), a subsidiary of the Russian Academy of Science and a well-known publisher of Quantum magazine, an English language replica of Kvant, an outstanding Soviet journal popularizing the maths and sciences among the youth.
    [Show full text]