India Daily, February 27, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

India Daily, February 27, 2017 INDIA DAILY February 27, 2017 India 23-Feb 1-day 1-mo 3-mo Sensex 28,893 0.1 5.5 11.7 Nifty 8,940 0.1 5.5 12.2 Contents Global/Regional indices Dow Jones 20,822 0.1 3.6 8.7 Special Reports Nasdaq Composite 5,845 0.2 3.3 8.3 Strategy FTSE 7,244 (0.4) 0.8 5.9 Strategy: La-la land Nikkei 19,101 (0.9) (1.9) 3.9 Hang Seng 23,966 (0.6) 2.6 5.5 Strategy: The future of savings in India: Watch it grow, not glow, Part 2 KOSPI 2,085 (0.4) 0.1 5.6 Value traded – India Strategy: The price of clean, cool air, Part 2 Cash (NSE+BSE) 363 286 156 Daily Alerts Derivatives (NSE) 9,590 5,203 5,365 Deri. open interest 3,849 3,071 3,111 Sector alerts Automobiles: Southern India was immune to demonetization: State-wise auto sales trend Forex/money market Change, basis points Consumer Products: Month in review - January 2017: Promotions recede as 23-Feb 1-day 1-mo 3-mo RM inflation inches up Rs/US$ 66.8 (14) (139) (174) 10yr govt bond, % 7.4 - 56 93 Energy: To integrate, merge or privatize? Net investment (US$ mn) 22-Feb MTD CYTD (1,170 FIIs 38 2,903 ) MFs 133 881 6,955 Top movers Change, % Best performers 23-Feb 1-day 1-mo 3-mo JPA IN Equity 14.8 6.1 40.5 103.4 JSP IN Equity 116.6 5.8 47.0 74.9 IDEA IN Equity 119.6 6.2 53.3 62.4 TTAN IN Equity 433.0 (1.6) 16.1 36.9 DLFU IN Equity 148.9 1.9 9.8 32.5 Worst performers DIVI IN Equity 749.6 (0.2) 5.8 (35.1) ARBP IN Equity 666.3 (1.8) (6.6) (10.0) DRRD IN Equity 2887.4 (0.5) (3.6) (8.9) CRG IN Equity 67.6 1.3 0.7 (8.2) UBBL IN Equity 786.1 (0.7) (3.3) (8.0) For Private Circulation Only. FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT KOTAK SECURITIES’ RATING SYSTEM AND OTHER DISCLOSURES. REFER TO THE END OF THIS MATERIAL. INDIA Strategy Portfolio FEBRUARY 27, 2017 UPDATE BSE-30: 28,893 La-la land. (1) General bullishness around global equities and (2) sector- and company- specific developments or anticipated events have further (1) reduced the reward-risk balance for the broader Indian market and (2) removed some of the few remaining areas of ‘positive’ mispricing in the Indian market. In our view, corporate banks are one of the few remaining sectors with favorable gap between price and value. The broad Indian market looks fully valued at 17.6X March 2018E ‘EPS’. QUICK NUMBERS General bullishness around global equities reduces reward-risk balance in general MSCI DM index up The general bullishness around global equities has resulted in strong performance of most DM 8%, MSCI EM 10% and EM markets over the past three months. In particular, EMs have bounced back from their and India 14% in December 2016 lows (see Exhibit 1), helped by the USD weakness over this period (see Exhibit the past three 2). The Indian market has outperformed other EMs over the past one month (see Exhibit 3) months helped by (1) limited perceived impact of demonetization and (2) several sector- and company- specific developments and expected events, which have been received well by the market. Nifty-50 Index at 17.6X FY2018E ‘EPS’ AXSB, HDFCB, RIL and telecom stocks rally on technical factors and expected positive events and 15X FY2019E ‘EPS’ The strong rally in a few large cap. stocks such as AXSB, BHARTI, HDFCB, IDEA and RIL has reduced the appeal of some of our recommended names (HDFCB and RIL). Also, valuations may Nifty-50 Index net have run ahead of fundamentals in the case of AXSB and telecom stocks on expectations of profits to grow (1) corporate action in the case of AXSB and (2) better pricing in the telecom sector post 19.5% and 16% for industry consolidation. AXSB trades at 2.3X FY2018E BV despite likely increase in NPLs in its FY2018E and corporate loan book. BHARTI and IDEA trade at over 2X FY2018-19E BV on very low or FY2019E negative RoEs. Certain corporate banks offer favorable gap between price and value Any government-backed resolution of NPLs may result in a significant re-rating of corporate banks. Banks seem to have broadly recognized bad loans and NPL formation may have peaked (see Exhibit 4) but they face significant challenges to resolve the bad loans. In our view, a joint private-government initiative may work with the private sector providing the capital and expertise to manage the bad loans and the government’s legal backing to the PSUs to enable them to make suitable ‘haircuts’ to bad loans. Meanwhile, (1) strong global steel prices and profitability may lead to improved cash flows, deleveraging and even potential upgrades; most steel assets are NPLs in the books of banks and (2) signing of PPAs by state governments may Sanjeev Prasad result in low slippages in the power sector; most are standard assets in the books of banks. ICICIBC and SBI have the right ingredients for significant re-rating Sunita Baldawa We see ICICI and SBI as good plays on (1) ongoing corporate deleveraging, (2) peaking of stressed assets (recognition) and potential government efforts towards resolution, (3) potential Anindya Bhowmik normalization of credit costs (LLPs) from 2HFY18, (4) possible upgrades in stressed assets in the steel sector that can bridge the current large gap between adjusted and reported book, (5) the structural shift towards retail lending given their strong liability franchise, which can support their transition to low-yield, low-risk retail lending businesses without a meaningful erosion in their NIMs, RoAs and RoEs and (6) financial savings; both have very good non-bank businesses in asset management and life insurance. For Private Circulation Only. FOR IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT KOTAK SECURITIES’ RATING SYSTEM AND OTHER DISCLOSURES, REFER TO THE END OF THIS MATERIAL. Strategy India Changes to Model Portfolio Exhibit 5 is our revised Model Portfolio. We reduce (1) weight on HDFCB by 200 bps to 800 bps noting the stock’s strong performance and full valuations (3.7X FY2018E BV and 3.2X FY2019E BV) and (2) weights on NTPC and PWGR by 100 bps each to 200 bps and 300 bps respectively. NTPC and PWGR stocks have delivered strong performance over the past 24 months and we see lower upside to our fair values for the stocks. Also, we see (1) limited scope for meaningful interest rate declines as the bulk of rate cuts may be largely over in the current economic cycle and (2) regulatory overhang from likely reduction to regulated returns for regulated generation and transmission assets for the next regulatory cycle (starting April 1, 2019). We add ARBP to the model portfolio with a weight of 200 bps noting its inexpensive valuations at 14.4X FY2018E EPS and 12.9X FY2019E EPS, which adequately factor in potential pricing pressure in the US, in our view. We note that ARBP has (1) a well-diversified portfolio in the US as its top-20 products contribute only 40% of its US revenues and (2) a strong pipeline of filings for new products. We increase weight on (1) SBI by 100 bps to 800 bps and (2) IOCL by 100 bps to 300 bps; IOCL trades at 10X FY2018E EPS, about 30% discount to its downstream oil peers BPCL and HPCL. We struggle to find meaningful value in our coverage universe with very few stocks offering meaningful upside to our 12-month fair valuations based on FY2019E earnings. The broad Indian market looks quite fairly valued (see Exhibits 6-7 for valuation of the Nifty-50 Index) and we model 19.5% and 16% growth in the net profits of the Nifty-50 Index for FY2018 and FY2019. We would clarify that we are not confident about a strong economic recovery and our projected strong growth in net profits of the Nifty-50 Index largely reflects (1) normalization of profits in the Indian banking sector with lower LLPs for FY2018E and FY2019E and (2) recovery in global commodity prices in 2HFY17, which will result in higher profits for the energy and metals & mining stocks under our coverage. As can be seen in Exhibit 8, the banking, energy and metals & mining sectors account for 62% of the incremental profits of the Nifty-50 Index in FY2018. Lastly, these sectors trade at significantly lower multiples versus the market’s as can be seen in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 1: Both DMs and EMs have performed strongly since late December 2016 Performance of MSCI EM Index and MSCI World Index in past five years (base=100) MSCI World MSCI EM 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 Jul-12 Jul-14 Jul-15 Jul-16 Jul-13 Jan-12 Jan-14 Jan-15 Jan-17 Jan-16 Jan-13 Source: Bloomberg, Kotak Institutional Equities KOTAK INSTITUTIONAL EQUITIES RESEARCH 3 India Strategy Exhibit 2: US dollar has weakened against major currencies since December 2016 Trend in dollar index (X) DXY 104 102 100 98 96 94 92 90 Jul-16 Jan-17 Jun-16 Feb-16 Oct-16 Feb-17 Sep-16 Apr-16 Dec-16 Nov-16 Mar-16 Aug-16 May-16 Source: Bloomberg, Kotak Institutional Equities Exhibit 3: EMs have rebounded in the past three months and India has outperformed other EMs Performance (not annualized) of emerging and developed markets over period of time (%) % change in local currency % change in USD 1-mo 3-mo 6-mo 1-yr 3-yr 5-yr 1-mo 3-mo 6-mo 1-yr 3-yr 5-yr Developed markets Australia 3 6 4 17 7 35 5 10 5 24 (8) (3) France 1 8 11 16 12 41 (1) 8 3 10 (14) 10 Germany 3 12 13 27 24 74 1 12 5 21 (5) 36 Hong Kong 6 7 6 25 7 13 6 7 6 25 7 13 Japan 1 7 17 21 30 101 3 5 4 20 18 44 Singapore 4 10 9 17 1 5 4 11 4 16 (10) (7) UK 1 7 7 22 7 23 2 7 0 9 (20) (4) US (Dow Jones) 5 9 12 26 29 60 5 9 12 26 29 60 US (S&P500) 4 7 9 23 29 73 4 7 9 23 29 73 MSCI World 3 8 6 20 11 42 Emerging markets Brazil 7 11 20 62 46 5 10 22 25 109 11 (42) India 7 11 3 26 45 64 9 14 3 29 35 20 Indonesia 2 3 (1) 15 15 38 2 5 (1) 16 1 (6) Korea 2 6 3 10 8 4 5 10 1 18 1 3 Malaysia 3 5 2 2 (7) 10 2 5 (8) (4) (31) (26) Mexico 3 5 (0) 10 20 25 9 7 (10)
Recommended publications
  • Tobacco Labelling -.:: GEOCITIES.Ws
    Council Directive 89/622/EC concerning the labelling of tobacco products, as amended TAR AND NICOTINE CONTENTS OF THE CIGARETTES SOLD ON THE EUROPEAN MARKET AUSTRIA Brand Tar Yield Nicotine Yield Mg. Mg. List 1 A3 14.0 0.8 A3 Filter 11.0 0.6 Belvedere 11.0 0.8 Camel Filters 14.0 1.1 Camel Filters 100 13.0 1.1 Camel Lights 8.0 0.7 Casablanca 6.0 0.6 Casablanca Ultra 2.0 0.2 Corso 4.0 0.4 Da Capo 9.0 0.4 Dames 9.0 0.6 Dames Filter Box 9.0 0.6 Ernte 23 13.0 0.8 Falk 5.0 0.4 Flirt 14.0 0.9 Flirt Filter 11.0 0.6 Golden Smart 12.0 0.8 HB 13.0 0.9 HB 100 14.0 1.0 Hobby 11.0 0.8 Hobby Box 11.0 0.8 Hobby Extra 11.0 0.8 Johnny Filter 11.0 0.9 Jonny 14.0 1.0 Kent 10.0 0.8 Kim 8.0 0.6 Kim Superlights 4.0 0.4 Lord Extra 8.0 0.6 Lucky Strike 13.0 1.0 Lucky Strike Lights 9.0 0.7 Marlboro 13.0 0.9 Marlboro 100 14.0 1.0 Marlboro Lights 7.0 0.6 Malboro Medium 9.0 0.7 Maverick 11.0 0.8 Memphis Classic 11.0 0.8 Memphis Blue 12.0 0.8 Memphis International 13.0 1.0 Memphis International 100 14.0 1.0 Memphis Lights 7.0 0.6 Memphis Lights 100 9.0 0.7 Memphis Medium 9.0 0.6 Memphis Menthol 7.0 0.5 Men 11.0 0.9 Men Light 5.0 0.5 Milde Sorte 8.0 0.5 Milde Sorte 1 1.0 0.1 Milde Sorte 100 9.0 0.5 Milde Sorte Super 6.0 0.3 Milde Sorte Ultra 4.0 0.4 Parisienne Mild 8.0 0.7 Parisienne Super 11.0 0.9 Peter Stuyvesant 12.0 0.8 Philip Morris Super Lights 4.0 0.4 Ronson 13.0 1.1 Smart Export 10.0 0.8 Treff 14.0 0.9 Trend 5.0 0.2 Trussardi Light 100 6.0 0.5 United E 12.0 0.9 Winston 13.0 0.9 York 9.0 0.7 List 2 Auslese de luxe 1.0 0.1 Benson & Hedges 12.0 1.0 Camel 15.0 1.0
    [Show full text]
  • Tobacco Tax Administration
    WHO TECHNICAL MANUAL ON Tobacco Tax Administration WHO TECHNICAL MANUAL ON Tobacco Tax Administration WHO Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data WHO technical manual on tobacco tax administration 1. Taxes. 2. Tobacco industry – legislation. 3.Tobacco – economics. 4. Smoking – prevention and control. I. World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 156399 4 (NLM classification: WM 290) Reprinted with executive summary, 2011 © World Health Organization 2010 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CO-OPERATION AGREEMENT Dated As of 27 September 2010
    CO-OPERATION AGREEMENT dated as of 27 September 2010 among IMPERIAL TOBACCO LIMITED AND THE EUROPEAN UNION REPRESENTED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND EACH MEMBER STATE LISTED ON THE SIGNATURE PAGES HERETO 1 ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS Section 1.1. Definitions........................................................................................... 7 ARTICLE 2 ITL’S SALES AND DISTRIBUTION COMPLIANCE PRACTICES Section 2.1. ITL Policies and Code of Conduct.................................................... 12 Section 2.2. Certification of Compliance.............................................................. 12 Section 2.3 Acquisition of Other Tobacco Companies and New Manufacturing Facilities. .......................................................................................... 14 Section 2.4 Subsequent changes to Affiliates of ITL............................................ 14 ARTICLE 3 ANTI-CONTRABAND AND ANTI-COUNTERFEIT INITIATIVES Section 3.1. Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeit Initiatives............................ 14 Section 3.2. Support for Anti-Contraband and Anti-Counterfeit Initiatives......... 14 ARTICLE 4 PAYMENTS TO SUPPORT THE ANTI-CONTRABAND AND ANTI-COUNTERFEIT COOPERATION ARTICLE 5 NOTIFICATION AND INSPECTION OF CONTRABAND AND COUNTERFEIT SEIZURES Section 5.1. Notice of Seizure. .............................................................................. 15 Section 5.2. Inspection of Seizures. ...................................................................... 16 Section 5.3. Determination of Seizures................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Q2 FY 2020/21 Results
    Q2 FY 2020/21 Results 6th November, 2020 Forward‐Looking Statements This presentation contains certain forward‐looking statements including those describing the Company’s strategies, strategic direction, objectives, future prospects, estimates etc. Investors are cautioned that “forward looking statements” are based on certain assumptions of future events over which the Company exercises no control. Therefore there can be no guarantee as to their accuracy and readers are advised not to place any undue reliance on these forward looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward‐ looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results or positions to differ materially from those that may be projected or implied by these forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: growth, competition, acquisitions, domestic and international economic conditions affecting demand, supply and price conditions in the various businesses in the Company’s portfolio, changes in Government regulations, tax regimes and other statutes, and the ability to attract and retain high quality human resource. 2 Daily Covid cases rose sharply in Aug & Second Wave in Europe & USA Sep’20; sharp fall in Oct’20 India : New Cases – Moving 7‐day Average (‘000s) Global : New Cases – Moving 7‐day Average (‘000s) 100 17 Sep’20 160 90 Daily New Cases – 97,894
    [Show full text]
  • ITC Sustainability Award for India's Million Smoking Deaths by John R
    WhyQuit Law of Addiction Joel's Library Freedom Turkeyville How to Quit FOR IMMEDIATE FREE RELEASE Contact: John R. Polito Saturday, April 20, 2014 [email protected] PDF of this article 01 (843) 797-3234 ITC sustainability award for India's million smoking deaths by John R. Polito India is home to 12% of the world's smokers (120 million), nearly one million annual smoking related deaths, and arguably the world's most brazen tobacco company, ITC Limited. ITC Ltd was originally known as Imperial Tobacco Company and then India Tobacco Company. But name changes cannot hide the fact that 82 percent of 2012-13 ITC profits came Question: How many millions of lives did ITC from cigarette sales. Nor can it hide corporate greed kill during 100 "inspiring" years? Why is it permitted inside India's schools? Click British American Tobacco's 30% image for higher resolution. ownership of ITC. ITC's website boasts, "ITC is the market leader in cigarettes in India. With its wide range of invaluable brands, ITC has a leadership position in every segment of the market. ITC's highly popular portfolio of brands includes Insignia, India Kings, Lucky Strike, Classic, Gold Flake, Navy Cut, Players, Scissors, Capstan, Berkeley, Bristol, Flake, Silk Cut, Duke & Royal." "Invaluable" brands? "Highly popular"? What ITC website visitors are not told is that smoking nicotine is highly addictive, that 80-90 percent of all lung cancers are attributable to smoking, or that 40-50 percent of ITC's nicotine addicts smoke themselves to death, with up to one-quarter dying during middle-age.
    [Show full text]
  • 38 2000 Tobacco Industry Projects—A Listing (173 Pp.) Project “A”: American Tobacco Co. Plan from 1959 to Enlist Professor
    38 2000 Tobacco Industry Projects—a Listing (173 pp.) Project “A”: American Tobacco Co. plan from 1959 to enlist Professors Hirsch and Shapiro of NYU’s Institute of Mathematical Science to evaluate “statistical material purporting to show association between smoking and lung cancer.” Hirsch and Shapiro concluded that “such analysis is not feasible because the studies did not employ the methods of mathematical science but represent merely a collection of random data, or counting noses as it were.” Statistical studies of the lung cancer- smoking relation were “utterly meaningless from the mathematical point of view” and that it was “impossible to proceed with a mathematical analysis of the proposition that cigarette smoking is a cause of lung cancer.” AT management concluded that this result was “not surprising” given the “utter paucity of any direct evidence linking smoking with lung canner.”112 Project A: Tobacco Institute plan from 1967 to air three television spots on smoking & health. Continued goal of the Institute to test its ability “to alter public opinion and knowledge of the asserted health hazards of cigarette smoking by using paid print media space.” CEOs in the fall of 1967 had approved the plan, which was supposed to involve “before-and-after opinion surveys on elements of the smoking and health controversy” to measure the impact of TI propaganda on this issue.”113 Spots were apparently refused by the networks in 1970, so plan shifted to Project B. Project A-040: Brown and Williamson effort from 1972 to 114 Project AA: Secret RJR effort from 1982-84 to find out how to improve “the RJR share of market among young adult women.” Appeal would 112 Janet C.
    [Show full text]
  • ITC Ltd (ITC) | 243 Target : | 277 Target Period : 12 Months Potential Upside : 14% Cigarette Volumes Back on Track
    Result Update October 28, 2016 Rating matrix Rating : Buy ITC Ltd (ITC) | 243 Target : | 277 Target Period : 12 months Potential Upside : 14% Cigarette volumes back on track... • ITC reported 7.8% YoY growth in revenue for Q2FY17 to | 13491.4 What’s changed? crore (I-direct estimate: | 14,288.7 crore). The company witnessed Target Unchanged EPS FY17E Changed from | 8.8 to | 8.7 7.1% YoY growth in cigarette business. FMCG segment grew EPS FY18E Changed from | 10.0 to | 9.7 strongly by 13.3% YoY largely driven by volumes supported by Rating Unchanged brand building and consumer/trade promotion activities. Hotels & agri business grew moderately by 2.5% and 2.0%, respectively; Quarterly performance however, paperboard remained flat | crore Q2FY17 Q2FY16 YoY (%) Q1FY17 QoQ (%) • Our estimates suggest cigarette volume growth in the quarter was Sales 13491.4 12511.8 7.8 13156.7 2.5 ~3-4% YoY and cigarette price hike was ~3%, which was lower than EBITDA 3630.0 3382.7 7.3 3526.2 2.9 our annual estimate of 10%. The company is consciously increasing EBITDA (%) 26.7 26.8 -16 bps 26.6 5 bps PAT 2500.0 2262.5 10.5 2384.7 4.8 the contribution 64 mm cigarettes due to lower tax incidence. • EBITDA margin remained largely flat on YoY basis to 26.7%. Other Key financials income grew substantially by 21.1% YoY leading to a 10.5% YoY | Crore FY15 FY16 FY17E FY18E growth in profit to | 2500.0 crore (I-direct estimate: | 2737.6 crore) Revenue 36,083.2 51,582.5 55,862.9 62,711.6 Cigarette volume growth bounced back in FY17E EBITDA 13,473.6 13,717.9 15,134.2 17,064.0 Net Profit 9,607.7 9,311.3 10,501.2 11,746.7 ITC, the undisputed leader in cigarettes (~75% volume share), has been EPS (|) 8.0 7.7 8.7 9.7 witnessing moderation in volume growth since FY14.
    [Show full text]
  • Télécharger Le Journal Au Format PDF 2,46 MB
    CENT QUATORZI6113 ANNÉE - N° 5.911 Le Numéro 0,65 F VENDREDI 8 JANVIER 1911 JOURNAL DE MONACO Bulletin Officiel de la Principauté JOURNAL HEBDOMADAIRE PARAISSANT LE VENDREDI ABONNEMENTS: UN AN DIRECTION - RÉDACTION MONACO - FRANCE ET COMMUNAUTÉ 25.00 F ADMINISTRATION Annexe de la «Propriété Industrielle» seule 10.00 F HOTEL DU GOUVERNEMENT ÉTRANGER: 32.00 F Changement d'adresse: 0.50 F Téléphone 30.19.21 Les Abonnements parlent du le' de chaque année . Compte Chèque Postal: 3019.4/ - Marseille INSERTIONS LÉGALES : 2.30 F . la ligne SOMMAIRE Ordonnance Souveraine n° 4.642 du 4 janler 1971 portant nomination d'un Secrétaire aux Œuvre Sociales de la Mairie (p. 23). MAISON SOUVERAINE Ordonnance Souveraine n° 4.643 du 4 janvier 1971 portant nomination d'un archiviste à la Mairie (p. 24). Ordonnance Souveraine n° 4.644 du 4 janvier 1971 portant nomi- Viner au Palais Princier (p. 17). nation d'une dactylographe-comptable à la Trésorerie Générale Déjeuna- au Palais Princier (p. 18). des Finances (p. 24). ORDONNANCES SOUVERAINES ARRÊTÉS MINISTÉRIELS Ordonnance Souveraine n° 4.630 du 2 janvier 1971 portant Arrêté Ministériel n° 70-419 du 14 décembre 1970 convoquant réduction du taux d'intérêt des obligations cautionnées (p. 19). le Collège Electoral (p. 25). usance Souveraine n° 4.631 du 2 janvier 1971 eonvogriant Arrêté Ministériel no 70-434 du 31 décembre 1970 fixant le le Conseil National en session extraordinaire (p. 19). prix de vente des tabacs (p. 25), Ordonnance Souveraine n° 4.632 du 4 janvier 1971 fixant les Arrêté Ministériel n° 70-435 du 31 décembre 1970 portant modi- porPons saisissables et cessibles des rémunérations, traite- fication du taux de remise aux débitants de tabacs (p.
    [Show full text]
  • India the Tax Treatment of Bidis
    P r o f e s s o r S i r J o h n C r o f t o n Dear Colleague: Tobacco is the world’s leading single agent of death, and India is the world’s second- largest consumer of tobacco. In India, bidis account for the great majority of smoked tobacco, and they are no less harmful than cigarettes. Having worked at intervals in India and with many Indian colleagues for more than 50 years, I remain deeply concerned about the current and growing epidemic of illness and death from tobacco, including from bidis. The attached report from Emil Sunley, one of the world’s leading experts on tobacco taxation, shows not only that taxes on bidis should increase, but also lays out a rational, detailed plan for how to do so. Sunley’s conclusions are clear: • On a per-stick basis, bidis are at least as harmful as cigarettes, but the excise on bidis is only 8% that of the most similar type of cigarettes, and less than 1% that of standard cigarettes. • Excise duty accounts for only 9% of the retail price of bidis; the recommended international benchmark for taxation from a health point of view is 70% or higher. • Between half and three quarters of all bidis are completely untaxed, either because of exemptions or tax evasion. Sunley’s recommendations are equally clear. To rationalize taxation and protect health, policymakers should: • In the immediate term, increase the excise rate on bidis from Rs 14 to at least Rs 168 per 1,000 sticks – resulting in a tax rate identical to that of the most similar type of cigarette.
    [Show full text]
  • Février 2020
    Bulletin fficiel Numéro 301 O FÉVRIER 2020 MINISTÈRE DE LA CULTURE Bulletin officiel Février 2020 Bulletin officiel 301 Directrice de la publication : Marie Villette Rédacteur en chef : Hugues Ghenassia-de Ferran Secrétaire de rédaction : Éric Rouard Contact : Véronique Van Temsche Ministère de la Culture Secrétariat général Service de la coordination des politiques culturelles et de l'innovation Mission de la politique documentaire 182, rue Saint-Honoré, 75033 Paris Cedex 1. Tél : 01 40 15 38 29 ISSN : 2556-0883 2 Bulletin officiel 301 SOMMAIRE Mesures de publication et de signalisation Administration générale Lignes directrices de gestion « mobilité » (janvier 2020). Page 7 Arrêté du 6 février 2020 portant nomination d’un haut fonctionnaire en charge du handicap Page 12 et de l’inclusion. Décision du 26 février 2020 modifiant la décision du 21 décembre 2018 fixant la composition Page 12 du comité technique d’administration centrale. Arrêté du 28 février 2020 portant désignation de la personne responsable de l’accès aux Page 12 documents administratifs et des questions relatives à la réutilisation des informations publiques. Centre national d’art et de culture Georges-Pompidou Décision du 25 février 2020 portant délégation de signature au Centre national d’art et de Page 13 culture-Georges-Pompidou. Création artistique - Administration générale Arrêté du 11 février 2020 désignant les experts pouvant être sollicités par les membres du jury Page 32 chargé de la sélection des pensionnaires de l’Académie de France à Rome pour l’année 2020. Arrêté du 11 février 2020 modifiant l’arrêté du 17 décembre 2019 nommant les membres Page 33 du jury chargé de la sélection des pensionnaires de l’Académie de France à Rome pour l’année 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017 Country Profile: India
    WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017 Country profile India WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) status Date of signature 10 September 2003 Date of ratification (or legal equivalent) 5 February 2004 Socioeconomic context Population 1 326 801 576 Income group Middle -income National tobacco control programme as at 31 December 2016 Specific national government objectives in tobacco control Yes National agency or technical unit for tobacco control Yes Number of full-time equivalent staff 400 Government’s expenditures on tobacco control, latest available year INR (2015), in currency reported by country 400 000 000 Summary of MPOWER measures M P O W E R MONITORING SMOKE -FREE CESSATION HEALTH MASS ADVERTISING TAXATION CIGARETTES POLICIES PROGRAMMES WARNINGS MEDIA BANS LESS AFFORDABLE SINCE 2008 YES The legend explaining the colours in this table appears at the end of this document. The methods used to derive all data in this profile are described in the technical notes of the WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017 Country Profile: India Prevalence of tobacco use Tobacco use data from the latest survey results as at 31 December 2016 Youth tobacco use Adult tobacco smoking Adult cigarette smoking Current Prevalence Current cigarette Current Daily Current Daily (%) tobacco use smoking Male 19.0 5.8 24.3 18.3 10.3 6.3 Female 8.3 2.4 2.9 2.4 0.8 0.6 Total 14.6 4.4 14.0 10.7 5.7 3.6 Youth: Global Youth Tobacco Survey, 2009; National, ages 13-15 Adult: Global Adult
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Tobacco Comments on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the Approximation Of
    Imperial Tobacco comments on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulation and administrative provisions of Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. COM(2012) 788 final (EU Scrutiny Committee reference 34587) 21 February 2013 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulation and administrative provisions of Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. COM(2012) 788 final (EU Scrutiny Committee reference 34587) 2 Page 5 February 2013 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulation and administrative provisions of Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. COM(2012) 788 final (EU Scrutiny Committee reference 34587) Introduction Imperial Tobacco is a FTSE 30 Company based in Bristol UK representing approximately 46% of the UK tobacco market. Imperial Tobacco submits these comments for consideration due to our serious concerns with regards to the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulation and administrative provisions of Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. COM(2012) 788 final (‘the Proposal’). Background: The Tobacco Products Directive The Tobacco Products Directive 2001/37/EC as amended currently govern the “manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products”. It covers, for example, the size and content of written warnings, the listing of ingredients and the banning of descriptions such as “mild” or “light”.
    [Show full text]